Practice locations of Texas family practice residency graduates, 1979-1987

The location of a physician's residency training is known to be a factor in selection of a practice location. In this paper, the authors analyze the practice locations of 689 family physicians who graduated from residency programs in Texas between 1979 and 1987 and who were practicing in Texas in 1988. One-third of these graduates were practicing in cities the same size as their residency program city. More than half were in counties located within 60 miles of the residency city. Both of these trends can be explained to a large degree by the fact that a high percentage of graduates remained in their residency city to practice. When these nonmobile graduates are removed from the sample, the findings show no correlation between the size of the residency city and the size of the practice city. More than two-thirds of those graduates who left their residency city were in counties beyond a 60-mile radius. Almost two-thirds were practicing in communities of less than 25,000 population. The authors conclude that state support for family practice residency training has been effective in distributing family physicians in a manner that addresses the needs of the state of Texas as a whole.     

Financing graduate medical education in family medicine

Family practice residency programs differ fiscally from residency programs in most other specialties because they have limited income-generating potential. The present review demonstrates that the typical family practice residency program has been fiscally solvent as a result of receiving approximately one-third of its income from state and federal appropriations. The level of such support plateaued in the 1980s and programs have not continued to expand despite an ongoing shortage of family physicians. Today, declining Medicare payments to hospitals threaten hospitals' contributions to family practice residency programs. The ability of family practice residency programs to meet the continuing need for family physicians will depend upon the development of specific state and federal policies that provide fiscal incentives to maintain and expand family practice residencies.     

A follow-up study of residents in internal-medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics-gynecology training programs in Massachusetts. Implications for the supply of primary-care physicians

A questionnaire survey of physicians who had been residents in internal medicine, pediatrics or obstetrics-gynecology in Massachusetts during the years 1967-1972 was undertaken to determine that specialties they now practice and the extent to which they deliver primary care. Over 600 physicians (74 per cent) responded. Devoting more than half their practice to a primary-care specialty were only 28 per cent of the former residents in internal medicine as compared with 56 per cent of those in pediatrics and 74 per cent of those in obstetrics-gynecology. For each group the fraction of full-time equivalent primary-care physicians produced was 0.27, 0.42 and 0.39 for the internal-medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics-gynecology programs respectively. These findings indicate that, although Massachusetts is meeting the requirements of PL 94-484 concerning the percentage of residency positions in the primary-care specialties, such compliance does not guarantee an adequate future supply of primary-care practioners.     

The meagerness of physicians' training in emergency psychiatric intervention

This study was undertaken to determine how much training physicians receive in emergency psychiatric intervention (EPI) during their residency programs. In 1988 the author mailed a questionnaire to 256 program directors of residencies in the major nonpsychiatry specialties. A total of 236 (92%) responded. Their responses indicate that emergency medicine and family practice residency programs provide the most training in EPI, followed by pediatrics, internal medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, and surgery. But overall, EPI training was meager. The findings indicate that 75% of the programs never assigned EPI-oriented readings to the residents and 70% of the programs never gave lectures or seminars on that subject. The author concludes that EPI skills are frequently absent in current medical practice because physicians have not been taught these skills; he recommends that more training is essential and indicates what it might consist of.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics residency training: current program trends and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Combined internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) residency programs have existed since 1967. Due to the rapid growth in the number and size of programs during the 1990s, most current med-peds physicians completed their residency in the last ten years, making older studies of med-peds programs obsolete. The authors sought to determine completion rates of med-peds residency programs and describe the initial career plans for five cohorts of graduating residents from combined med-peds training programs. METHOD: Program directors of all U.S. med-peds residency programs were asked to complete a Web-based survey and base their responses on the records of cohorts of residents completing their programs from 1998 through 2002. To allow sufficient time to complete both the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certification examinations, certification status was requested only for the cohort completing training in 1998. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 92% (83/90) of the programs, reflecting 1,595 residents entering med-peds programs. Of these residents, 91% graduated from a med-peds program. Among the graduates, 82% were seeing both adults and children, 22% went on to subspecialty residencies, 21% began practice in rural or underserved areas, and 25% entered an academic position. ABIM and ABP pass rates for the 1998 cohort were 97% and 96%, respectively. Overall, 79% of the 1998 graduates are board certified in both specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous studies, a greater proportion of residents who recently entered med-peds programs completed their dual training, and a larger percentage of graduates are seeing both adults and children. The proportion of residents entering subspecialty residencies has increased significantly, but the proportion of graduates in academic careers has remained stable.     

Family practice training over the first 26 years: a cross-sectional survey of graduates of the University of Washington Family Practice Residency Network.

PURPOSE: To describe the current practice setting, scope of practice, and adequacy of residency training of a large cohort of family practice (FP) residency graduates. METHOD: In February 2000, questionnaires containing 120 demographic, practice, and training items were mailed to 1,498 graduates (1973-1999) of the University of Washington Family Practice Residency Network. RESULTS: A total of 983 (71%) graduates completed the survey. Of the 870 who were currently practicing family physicians, 38% were women, 73% worked full-time, 45% practiced in FP groups, and 97% were board certified in FP. A total of 37% practiced in communities of fewer than 25,000 residents, and 29% practiced in federally designated health provider shortage sites. Most cared for their patients in the hospital: 79% for adult medical patients, 54% for adult ICU/CCU patients, and 71% for children. Most provided maternity care: 63% delivered babies and 58% assisted at cesarean sections (12% as primary surgeon). Even in cities of over 100,000, 58% delivered babies. Large numbers of responders performed colposcopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, vasectomy, and minor surgery. A higher proportion of the most recent graduates provided maternity care and performed colposcopy. Most graduates reported that residency training prepared them well. CONCLUSIONS: FP residency training is modeled to prepare primary care physicians to meet the needs of all patients in all communities. These data document the success of this model in producing and sustaining family physicians to fulfill these roles in practice.     

The influence of quality-of-life, academic, and workplace factors on residency program selection.

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of quality-of-life, academic, and workplace factors on residency program selection and determine whether factors are valued differently by applicants choosing surgical (SP) versus nonsurgical (NSP) programs. METHOD: All 16,183 graduates of U.S. allopathic medical schools registered with the Electronic Residency Application Service were surveyed during the 2003 residency match. A total of 7,183 (44%) applicants responded. Selection prevalence from among 20 possible influential factors and the relative importance assigned to those chosen factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common factors influencing residency program selection were how much the residency program seemed to care about its trainees (98%), how satisfied the current residents are with their program (98%), how well the applicant thought he or she would fit into the program (97%), the geographic location of the residency (95%), and how well the current residents seem to work with each other (94%). Applicants to NSP were more likely to consider geographic location (p <.001), emphasis on interacting with medical students (p =.019), amount of clinical support services (p <.001), frequency of on-call duty (p =.047), types of benefits (p <.001), salary (p =.023), and supplemental income (moonlighting) opportunities (p <.001) than were applicants to SP. SP applicants were more likely to consider emphasis on research in the residency curriculum (p <.001) and how well the current residents worked together (p <.001) than were NSP applicants. CONCLUSIONS: Of factors that influence residency program selection, those related to the characteristics of the workplace environment and geography are the most important. Minimal differences exist between applicants selecting surgical and nonsurgical specialties regarding academic and quality-of-life issues.     

Geriatrics in residency programs

To determine how well geriatrics has been integrated into residency training, the authors surveyed a random 33% sample of all the 378 family practice (n = 126) and 420 internal medicine (n = 140) training programs in the United States in 1988. All the programs responded. On average, the internal medicine programs had more geriatrics faculty than did the family practice faculty, but these numbers were insufficient to meet current or future needs. Fewer than half of the residencies had geriatrics inpatient or ambulatory-care evaluation units, geriatrics consult services, geropsychiatry wards, or geriatrics clinics available as training sites. In contrast, nursing homes were available for 93% of the family practice programs and 58% of the internal medicine programs. A total of 80% of the family practice programs but only 36% of the internal medicine programs had geriatrics curricula in place. The authors conclude that integration of geriatrics content into residency training is far from universal, largely because of a shortage of faculty and clinical training sites.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics physicians: their care of children versus care of adults.

Purpose To determine how practicing physicians who graduated from internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs allocate their practice time and professional activities between adult and child patients, and to investigate whether there are predictors of the extent to which a particular physician's practice is more or less focused on one or the other of these patient groups. Method In 2003, the authors mailed a questionnaire to the 1,300 generalists and 472 subspecialists who, as of 2003, had completed internal medicine-pediatrics training since the inception of the program in 1980. Results The response rate was 73% for the generalists and 65% for the subspecialists. The vast majority of the generalist physicians stated that they provide care to all ages of patients. However, the proportion of care they provided to different age groups was not uniformly distributed, with more care provided to adults than children. Both generalist and subspecialist respondents were more likely to feel better prepared by their residency training to care for adults than for children. Those who felt less well-prepared to care for children were less likely to do so in their practices (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.96). Fifty-four percent of the subspecialists pursued subspecialty training in internal medicine only, while 38% completed a combined internal medicine-pediatrics subspecialty program. These respondents, like the generalist respondents, also were more likely to focus clinical efforts on adults than children. Fewer than half (43%) provided any care to children zero to one year of age, while 54% provided at least some care to children aged two to 11 years. Conclusions Internal medicine-pediatrics physicians are more likely to spend a majority of their clinical care focused on adults and to perceive that they stay more current in the care of adults than of children. Potential reasons for this disparity may include training issues, greater reimbursement for the care of adults, perceptions of the impact on the medical market of the demographic shifts to older adults, and employment opportunities following training. These results also demonstrate the need for a more detailed and comprehensive assessment of the adequacy of pediatrics training in these programs.     

Internal medicine and family practice. Controversies, conflict and compromise.

Internal medicine and family practice have come into conflict because both specialties consider primary care to be part of their "turf". Moreover, in academic medical centers there is competition for scarce resources, including patients and support for residents. Analysis of the number of physicians in practice as well as in training shows clearly that both internists and family physicians, as well as pediatricians and obstetricians, must participate in rendering primary care if the needs for this type of physician are to be met. Internal medicine also has to achieve a better balance between generalists and subspecialists, and family practice must define its limitations, monitor its rapid growth and assure the quality of its training programs. Most of these problems are internal to each speciality rather than between two specialties, and, where there is conflict, compromise is clearly possible.     

Physicians at the medicine/psychiatric interface: what do internist/psychiatrists do?

Studies have convincingly demonstrated that some 50% of patients in primary care settings have both medical and psychiatric diagnoses requiring dual treatment. The concept of primary care psychiatry has emerged in recent years as one way to address this problem. In 1979 the first combined medicine-psychiatry residency was formed. There are now over 20 such programs, but there is little information on how these doubly trained physicians actually practice. In 1997, the authors surveyed the 268 physicians with board certification in both internal medicine and psychiatry that were listed with the American Board of Medical Specialties. Only 15% practiced any type of medicine at all; the rest were involved only in the practice of psychiatry. Although 75% identified themselves only as psychiatrists and worked predominantly in psychiatry, 95% reported using both their medical and psychiatric training in their professional work. They reported that the dual training made them better physicians, improved their professional credibility, and enhanced their diagnostic skills. Several significant barriers were discovered that directly affect the ability of physicians to practice in two fields. Findings, study limitations, and potential implications for the field and its patients are discussed.     

Specialization in family medicine--has all the planned been achieved?

The planned, comprehensive inclusion of general practitioners/family physicians in specialist education has begun with the project entitled Harmonization of Family Medicine Service with European Standards by the Implementation of Compulsory Residency. According to the Project, all physicians working in family medicine practice should have an opportunity to complete the respective residency by 2015. Analysis of the planned and completed family medicine residency in Croatia during the 2002-2006 period is presented. Of the total family medicine residency positions planned during the four-year period, 543 (90.5%) have been completed, with the greatest discrepancy recorded in program A applying to physicians younger than 35 having concluded a contract with the Croatian Institute of Health Insurance. In addition, this relationship varied among different countries. There are a number of obstacles hindering the Project implementation. However, it should be noted that the Project has made a breakthrough in upgrading the quality of family medicine practice, as a pledge of future development and rational performance of the entire health care system in Croatia, in order to promote the health care of the population at large.     

Specialty selection and success in obtaining choice of residency training among 1987 U.S. medical graduates by race-ethnicity and gender.

The authors developed baseline data on specialty selection and success in obtaining residency positions for the medical school graduates of 1987 who participated in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), compared by gender and race-ethnicity. They focused on primary care specialties and obstetrics-gynecology versus all other specialties, and sought to identify group differences in (1) patterns of specialty preference, (2) evolution of specialty choice from before to after medical school, (3) success in attaining the first choice of specialty through the NRMP, and (4) patterns in switching from an alternate specialty (ranked second or lower) to the first-choice specialty between the first and second years of residency training. The results showed substantial intergroup and intragroup variations, both before and after medical school, for family practice, internal medicine, and obstetrics-gynecology. Examination of NRMP outcomes revealed that the underrepresented-minority (URM) graduates, particularly men, were less successful both in achieving any match and in matching to their first-choice specialties. Analyses of patterns in switching specialties revealed several important facts about those who were matched to alternate specialties: (1) over half entered their first-choice specialties in the second year; (2) women had more success in switching to their first-choice specialties than did men, particularly among the URMs; (3) among those who received alternate specialties, the URM women were more likely than the URM men to leave graduate medical education by the second year (reversing the trend for the other groups); and (4) individuals whose alternate specialties were in primary care were much less likely to switch to their first-choice specialties.     

Obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care: training during obstetrics-gynecology residency and current practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' perceptions of their residency training in primary care, document health issues assessed at annual visits, and identify practice patterns of both generalist and specialist obstetrician-gynecologists. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,711 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Young Fellows in September 2005. Information was gathered on perceptions about adequacy of residency training, how well training prepared obstetrician-gynecologists for current practice, and typical practice patterns for various medical diagnoses. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis of variance, t tests, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of 935 respondents (55% response rate), physicians estimated that 37% of private, nonpregnant patients rely on them for routine primary care. Approximately 22% report that they needed additional primary care training, specifically for metabolism/nutrition and dermatologic, cardiovascular, and psychosexual disorders. A wide range of topics, except for immunizations, were typically discussed at annual visits. Patients with pulmonary diseases, vascular diseases, and nongenital cancers were most often referred to specialists, whereas patients with urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, or who are menopausal are most often managed totally. Self-identification as a generalist or specialist was associated with some practice patterns. Respondents were neutral about the role of primary care in obstetrics-gynecology residency training. CONCLUSIONS: For several primary care issues, obstetrician-gynecologists assumed sole management for obstetric patients but deferred to a primary care physician for gynecological patients. There is a continuing need for primary care training in obstetrics-gynecology residency, although it is unclear whether current training is adequate to meet their needs.     

Gender bias of Ohio physicians in the evaluation of the personal statements of residency applicants

Sexism has been documented at every level of medical training as well as in the community of practicing physicians. Although there is speculation in the literature about sexist attitudes and perceived sexual discrimination influencing a medical student's choice of specialty, there are few data on gender bias in the evaluation of residency candidates applying in different specialties. In 1989, the authors created six personal statements of interest in a residency, each from a different type of fictitious residency candidate (three men, three women, at three levels of medical school achievement) and mailed one or another of the statements, chosen at random, to the 2,478 board-certified Ohio physicians practicing in six specialties in which U.S. women in residencies were underrepresented (less than 12%) compared with the percentage of women in medical schools, and to the 3,586 board-certified Ohio physicians in another six specialties in which women in residencies were overrepresented (more than 38%). The physicians consistently rated the women candidates more favorably than they did the men candidates.     

Board-certified physicians in the United States, 1971-1986

BACKGROUND. This is our third report covering the census of U.S. physicians over a 15-year period. The present report updates the information for 1980 to 1986. METHODS. Most of our data are based on published information from the Association of American Medical Colleges, the Educational Council for Foreign Medical Graduates, the American Board of Medical Specialties, and the National Resident Matching Program. Data on board-certified physicians were obtained from the Division of Survey and Data Resources of the American Medical Association and are not published elsewhere. RESULTS. After a steep rise in the 1970s, the annual number of physicians receiving licenses increased at a slower rate. The numbers of new board diplomas in medicine and primary care continued to grow. In other non-surgical clinical specialties there was less growth, and in certain fields of surgery the numbers declined. The board-certified percentage of all practitioners increased slightly (74 to 79 percent). About 14 to 16 percent of all active physicians are still in their residency and fellowship years. The percentage of all practitioners under the age of 35 who are women has increased from 8.4 percent in 1967 to 25.2 percent in 1986. The enrollment of some residency programs is currently more than 50 percent women. CONCLUSIONS. The work force of physicians did not grow as rapidly in the 1980s as in the 1970s. This nonlinearity of growth and massive changes in the epidemiology and treatment of disease render predictions about the need for or the numbers of physicians a decade hence unreliable.     

Observations of residents' work activities for 24 consecutive hours: implications for workflow redesign.

PURPOSE: To examine resident workflow as part of an institutional approach to redesigning the processes of health care delivery. METHOD: In 2003 the authors observed the workflows for 24 hours of seven residents who were at various levels of training (two each from the internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology programs, and one from general surgery) at Denver Health Medical Center, an urban, public teaching hospital. RESULTS: Although the residents spent varying proportions of their time in various activities, all had extremely fragmented workflows as they engaged in from 5.0 to 11.3 different activities per hour of nonsleeping time, many of which required only minutes to complete. All residents experienced frequent interruptions and changes in focus. The internal medicine and surgery residents spent large amounts of time traveling, covering three and six miles, respectively, during their 24-hour shifts. Three of the residents slept between one-quarter and one-third of their time on duty (one without any interruption). CONCLUSIONS: The authors suggest that fragmented workflow exists in all residency programs and that applying the same work limitations to all residents in all training programs (to reduce fatigue-related errors) may be overly restrictive. Improving these processes of care will be difficult and will likely require analytic skills and knowledge of systems engineering that most physicians do not have.