Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing

There are limited data about the chronotropic capacity of the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) sensor. This study directly compared the chronotropic function from the PEA and the activity (ACT) sensor. The study included 18 patients (age 73 ± 7 years) with ≥ 75% pacemaker-driven heart rate (HR) and a PEA sensor and 11 healthy controls (age 67 ± 7 years) underwent a chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP) exercise test with the pacemaker patients in VVIR mode after programming the sensors in the default setting with adjustment of the upper sensor rate as an age related maximum value (220-age). The ACT sensor was externally strapped on the thorax. Achieved exercise duration for the patients and controls was, respectively, 9.2 ± 3 vs 18.4 ± 4 minutes (P < 0.001). The maximal achieved HR with the PEA sensor was 124 ± 25 beats/min, versus the ACT with 140 ± 23, versus the controls with 153 ± 26 beats/min (P < 0.001 between the groups). For the PEA, ACT, and controls, the time to peak HR was, respectively, 11 ± 3, 7 ± 3.6, and 18 ± 4 (P < 0.001 between groups) and HR after 10 minutes recovery was, respectively, 80 ± 20, 65 ± 15, and 82 ± 4 beats/min (P < 0.001 between groups). The PEA sensor functions hypochonotroop during exercise programmed as a single sensor system. It is, therefore, preferable to combine the PEA sensor with an activity-based sensor in a dual sensor system. Although both groups had normal left ventricular functions, the exercise capacity of pacemaker patients is significantly lower than in the controls.     

A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results

Background: Adaptive rate sensors used in permanent pacemakers incorporate an accelerometer (XL) to increase heart rate with activity. Limited data exists regarding the relative benefit of a blended sensor (BS) (XL and minute ventilation) versus XL alone in restoring chronotropic response (CR) in chronotropically incompetent (CI) patients. Methods: One thousand five hundred thirty‐eight patients from the limiting chronotropic incompetence for pacemaker recipients (LIFE) study were implanted with a pacemaker and 1,256 patients had data collected at 1 month. Patients performed a treadmill test 1‐month postimplant while programed in nonrate responsive mode (DDD‐60) to determine CI. Only patients who completed at least three exercise stages and achieved a peak perceived exertion ≥16 were included in the analyses. The metabolic chronotropic relationship (MCR) slope was used to evaluate CR in 547 patients. Patients were randomized to XL or BS with a conservative fixed rate response factor (XL = 8, MV = 4). CI patients performed a follow‐up 6‐month treadmill test. Results: CI prevalence in this patient population (n = 547) was 34%. No differences in baseline characteristics existed between groups. Although both groups showed significant within‐group improvements in MCR slope from 1 to 6 months (both P < 0.001), the BS group had a significantly higher MCR slope at 6 months compared to the XL group (P = 0.011). Improvement in quality of life (QOL) did not differ between groups . Conclusions: In this general pacemaker population with CI, a BS programed empirically restores CR more favorably than an XL sensor programed nominally. Further studies are needed to determine if individual sensor optimization would lead to improvement in functional capacity, higher MCR slopes, and QOL.     

The "Low Intensity Treadmill Exercise" Protocol for Appropriate Rate Adaptive Programming of Minute Ventilation Controlled Pacemakers

The objective of rate adaptive pacemakers that measure minute ventilation by tmnsthoracic impedance is to simulate the physiological relationship of the sensed signal to the sinus node response during exercise, thus achieving an appropriate matching of heart rate with patient effort. The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological relationship between heart rate and minute ventilation (HR/VE) during peak exercise testing in order to develop a database for appropriate rate adaptive slope programming of minute ventilation controlled pacemakers. Due to several clinical limitations of peak exercise testing, it was additionally determined whether the 35-watt “low intensity treadmill exercise” (LITE) protocol can be used as a substitute for peak exercise test using the “ramping incremental treadmill exercise” (RITE) protocol in order to assess the correct HR/VE slope below the anaerobic threshold. The stress tests were performed on a treadmill with the collection of breath-by-breath gas exchange. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the HR/VE slope below and above the anaerobic threshold and during the early, dynamic phase of low intensity exercise with the RITE and LITE protocols, respectively. The results of this testing in 41 healthy subjects demonstrated that the HR/VE relationship throughout treadmill exercise using the RITE protocol was not linear but curvilinear in nature, with a steeper HR/VE slope of 1.54 ± 0.51 below versus 1.15 ± 0.37 above the anaerobic threshold (P < 0.005). The HR/VE slope determined during the early, dynamic phase of the LITE protocol (1.58 ± 0.88) did not differ from the HR/VE slope from rest to anaerobic threshold obtained using the peak exercise RITE test (1.54 ± 0.51; P = 0.79), Rate adaptive pacing should simulate the curvilinear relationship between heart rate and minute ventilation from rest to peak exercise. The HR/VE slope determined during the early, dynamic phase of low intensity exercise represents the HR/VE slope derived from the RITE protocol below the anaerobic threshold. According to the peak exercise database, the slope above anaerobic threshold can easily be calculated as a percentage of the slope below the anaerobic threshold. The LITE protocol can, therefore, be effectively performed as a substitute for peak exercise stress tests to determine the correct pacemaker rate response factor in order to obtain a physiological heart rate to minute ventilation relationship for the appropriate matching of paced heart rate with patient effort.     

Accelerometer-Based Adaptive-Rate Pacing: A Multicenter Study

A new adaptive rate pacemaker, using an acceleromeler to detect body motion as an indicator of metabolic demand, was evaluated in 13 centers located in five countries. During the study, 55 patients with a broad range of indications were implanted with the EXCEl™ VR single chamber pacemaker. One month evaluations were completed on a subgroup 0f 37 patients. The pacemaker response was optimized before discharge using a simple walking test. An "exercise test" recording feature in the programmer eliminated the need for ECG monitoring. At nominal settings, the mean (± SD) pacing rate increased 29 ± 9 ppm while walking slowly and 44 ± 11 ppm (n = 33) during a brisk walk. This information was used to optimize the parameter settings. Without further changes to the programmed settings the patients were subsequently tested 2–4 weeks postimplant with a symptom-limited treadmill test using the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP). Mean pacing rate increased from 74.5 ±2.5 ppm (n = 24) at rest to 118.6 ± 12.2 ppm (n = 21) at 3 mph/6% grade to 143.5 ± 3.5 ppm [n = 2) at 3.8 mph/8% grade. Conclusion: The individual responses were proportional to the physical exertion imposed on the patients. Pacing rates were considered to be appropriate using the chronotropic response zone as a criterion for appropriate rate modulation. A simple walking test utilizing the exercise test facility, results in appropriate optimization of the pulse generator to the individual patient.     

Clinical Results of Automatic Slope Adaptation in a Dual Sensor VVIR Pacemaker

Manual slope programming in rate adaptive pacemakers can be time consuming. This may become worse with dual sensor devices. The remedy is to let the pacemaker automatically learn the slopes. Fast learning replaces initial manual slope programming. Daily learning is a continuous process to determine and optimize slopes during daily life. Both methods are known for a QT sensing pacemaker. Fast learning is known for other single sensor devices. The aim of this study was to follow daily learning in a QT and activity dual sensor pacemaker, starting with factory slope settings. Six patients were studied for about 8 weeks. The daily learning algorithm appeared to be elective, showing the desired regulation processes. It took 2–5 weeks to reach full rate response.     

Individual optimization of pacing sensors improves exercise capacity without influencing quality of life

INTRODUCTION: Programmable pacemaker sensor features are frequently used in default setting. Limited data are available about the effect of sensor optimization on exercise capacity and quality of life (QOL). Influence of individual optimization of sensors on QOL and exercise tolerance was investigated in a randomized, single blind study in patients with VVIR, DDDR, or AAIR pacemakers. METHODS: Patients with > or =75% pacing were randomized to optimized sensor settings (OSS) or default sensor setting (DSS). Standardized optimization was performed using three different exercise tests. QOL questionnaires (QOL-q: Hacettepe, Karolinska, and RAND-36) were used for evaluation of the sensor optimization. One month before and after optimization, exercise capacity using chronotropic assessment exercise protocol and the three QOL-q were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (26 male, 28 female) with a mean age of 65 +/- 16 years were enrolled in the study. In each group (OSS and DSS) 27 patients were included. One month after sensor optimization, the achieved maximal heart rate (HR) and metabolic workload (METS) were significantly higher in OSS when compared with DSS (124 +/- 28 bpm vs 108 +/- 20 bpm, P = 0.036; 7.3 +/- 4 METS vs 4.9 +/- 4 METS, P = 0.045). Highest HR and METS were achieved in patients with pacemakers with accessible sensor algorithms. In patients with automatic slope settings (33%), exercise capacity did not improve after sensor optimization. QOL did not improve in OSS compared with DSS. CONCLUSION: After 1 month of individual optimization of rate response pacemakers, exercise capacity was improved and maximum HR increased, although QOL remained unchanged. Accessible pacemaker sensor algorithms are mandatory for individual optimization.     

An Integrated Dual Sensor System Automatically Optimized by Target Rate Histogram

The use of combined sensors and advanced algorithms using different principles can improve rate performance over a single sensor system. Combinations of sensors and more sophisticated algorithms, however, invariably increase the complexity of pacemaker programming. An automatically optimized combined minute ventilation and activity DDDR pacemaker was developed to minimize repeated sensor adjustment. The device used subthreshold (below cardiac stimulation threshold) lead impedance to detect lead configuration at implantation automatically, followed by "implant management," including setting of lead polarity and initiation of DDDR pacing. Automatic sensor adaptation was achieved by programming a "target rate histogram" based on the patient's activity level and frequency of exertion, and the rate profile optimization process matched the recorded integrated sensor response to the target rate histogram profile. In nine patients implanted with the DX2 pacemakers, the implant management gave 100% accuracy in the detection of lead polarity. Rate profile optinuzation automatically increased the pacing rate during exercise between discharge and 3-month follow-up (hall walk: 78 ± 3 vs 98 ± 3 beats/min, and maximal treadmill exercise: 89 ± 6 vs 115 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.001) with a significant increase in exercise duration during maximal exercise (7.18 ± 1 min vs 9.56 ± 2 min, P = 0.05). The accuracy of rate profile optimization versus manual programming was assessed at 1 month, and there was no significant difference between pacing rate kinetics and maximal pacing rate between the two methods of programming. In conclusion, pacemaker automaticity can be initiated at implantation and the self-optimized rate adaptive response appeared to be comparable to that derived from a manual programming procedure, which may reduce the need to perform time consuming sensor programming.     

Reliability of the Evoked Response in Determining the Paced Ventricular Rate and Performance of the QT or Rate Responsive (TX) Pacemaker

The TX pacemaker uses a conventional transvenous electrode to sense T-waves of paced ventricular complexes and it adapts the pacing rate to varying physiological demands by responding to changes in the QT or, more correctly, the stimulus artifact-to-T-wave (stimulus-T) interval. This pacing system was assessed in 13 patients. The relation between heart rate and stimulus-T interval and the effect of programming on the performance of this pacemaker were studied on several occasions in each patient. Treadmill exercise performance during TX pacing mode was compared with atrial synchronized ventricular (VAT) and asynchronous ventricular demand (VOO and VVI--70 beats per minute) pacing modes. T-wave sensing problems arose in three patients. In one, this was overcome by reducing the pulse amplitude from 5.0 to 2.5 V. In another patient, spontaneous recovery of T-wave sensing occurred 5 months after pacemaker implantation. T-wave sensing deteriorated with the passage of time in most patients. Satisfactory rate response as assessed by treadmill exercise testing and Holter monitoring was achieved in 12 patients through adjustments of two programmable parameters: the slope that defines the alteration in heart rate in response to a millisecond change in stimulus-T interval and the "sensing window" that is the interval during which T-waves can be sensed and a rate response is possible. Exercise performance was significantly better during rate responsive pacing (TX) mode as compared with VVI pacing but was comparable to that during VAT pacing. The resting heart rate/stimulus-T interval can be described by the following linear regression equation: stimulus-T interval = 466 - 1.68 X paced-rate, r2 = -0.62. This relation, however, was subject to wide inter- and intra-patient variation. Consequently, given identical programmed parameters and exercise protocol, the chronotropic response differed significantly from patient to patient and in the same patient from one occasion to another. Our results show that a physiologically beneficial chronotropic response can be achieved in most patients. However, reprogramming, based on results of exercise tests and Holter monitoring, may be necessary to adjust for changes in T-wave sensing and the heart rate/stimulus-T interval relation and, thus to ensure that the pacemaker continues to function optimally.     

Initial Clinical Experience with a New Dual Sensor SSIR Pacemaker Controlled by Body Activity and Minute Ventilation

Fourteen patients were implanted with a single chamber dual sensor pacemaker (Legend Plus®) that measures minute ventilation (VE) via variations in impedance between a bipolar lead and the pacemaker case, and activity via a piezoelectric crystal bonded to the pacemaker case. Chronotropic incompetent patients were exercised an a treadmill and a bicycle in dual sensor mode. Activity only indicated pacing rate was measured using a strap-on pacemaker. Both implanted and strap on pacemakers were adjusted to yield a steady-state pacing rate of 100 beats/min during hall walk. Pacing rate, VE, and oxygen uptake (VO₂) were measured continuously. Linear curve fit analysis slopes for plots of VE versus pacing rate during exercise (1.33-1.49) compared favorably to values reported in normals. Peak pacing rates achieved for treadmill and bicycle testing for dual sensor mode were higher than activity mode alone. Slopes of heart rate to VE or VO₂ were not significantly different (P < 0.05) for dual sensor mode in contrast to activity alone. In conclusion, the Legend Plus dual sensor rate adaptive pacing therapy delivered pacing rates more proportional to VE and VO₂ under different types of exercise than rates indicated by a strap-on pacemaker in activity mode.     

Assessment of the Chronotropic Response at the Anaerobic Threshold: An Objective Measure of Chronotropic Function

MEINE, M., et al. : Assessment of the Chronotropic Response at the Anaerobic Threshold: An Objective Measure of Chronotropic Function. The evaluation of the heart rate response to exercise is important for the diagnosis of chronotropic incompetence and the assessment of a rate responsive algorithm of sensorcontrolled pacemakers. The aim of the present study was to examine a classification of the chronotropic response at an individually moderate exercise level. Sixteen pacemaker patients (patient group, age 62.9 ± 7.6 years ) with sick sinus syndrome and 15 age‐matched healthy subjects (control group, age 57.6 ± 9.4 years ) underwent a maximum cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill after a protocol with individually selected incremental steps. To analyze the patients' intrinsic heart rate response, the rate responsive mode of the pacemaker was switched off. Chronotropic incompetence was diagnosed in eight patients whose maximal heart rate was < 80% of the age‐predicted heart rate. The heart rate at the anaerobic threshold was significantly lower in the chronotropically incompetent subgroup than in the chronotropically competent patients and the healthy subjects (85.9 ± 6.6 beats/min vs 100.3 ± 9.9 beats/min and 112.9 ± 11.7 beats/min , respectively). The chronotropic slope of the heart rate reserve as a function of the metabolic reserve was significantly higher in the control group than in the patient groups with either mild or severe chronotropic incompetence (0.94 ± 0.17 vs 0.64 ± 0.08 and 0.43 ± 0.14 , respectively). Furthermore, the chronotropically incompetent response could be divided into a linear type with and without a threshold, an exponential, and a logarithmic type. The anaerobic threshold was an objectively detectable breakpoint at an individually moderate exercise level that could be used for characterization of chronotropic function. At the anaerobic threshold, a physiological heart rate response was about 220 ‐ age – 50 beats/min. A deviation of more than 10 beats/min below this physiological value characterized chronotropic incompetence.     

Clinical Experience with an Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemaker Using an Accelerometer Sensor

The rate adaptive characteristics and pacemaker mediated tachycardia protection algorithm of an accelerometer based DDDR pacemaker were evaluated in 11 patients with bradycardia (seven atrioventricular block, four sick sinus syndrome). Rate adaptive programming was effected by collecting the acceleration level during a 3-minute moderate exercise ("tailoring" of sensor). In comparison with an externally attached piezoelectric sensor, the accelerometer sensor showed lower rate changes during external tapping of the pacemaker (16 +/- 3 vs 29 +/- 4 ppm, P less than 0.02) and applied direct pressure (1 +/- 1 vs 40 +/- 3 beats/min, P less than 0.001) on the pacemaker. At nominal setting, the accelerometer sensor showed improved rate stability and higher rate response to jogging and standing, although responses to other daily activities and treadmill exercise were similar. Apart from changing the rate responsive slope, rate response could be improved by repeat "tailoring" of the sensor at a lower exercise level, resulting in better overall rate response characteristics. The ability of the rate monitoring software to collect acceleration levels for an activity and profile the projected rate response at different rate responsive settings allowed programming to be effected with the minimum amount of exercise testing. The pacemaker also discriminated atrial tachyarrhythmias from normal sinus response using the sensor to judge the appropriateness of the atrial rate, which correctly identified and prevented rapid ventricular tracking in two patients during atrial flutter/fibrillation.     

Behavior of Different Activity-Based Pacemakers During Treadmill Exercise Testing with Variable Slopes: A Comparison of Three Activity-Based Pacing Systems

A new generation of activity-based pacemakers incorporates an accelerometer sensitive to low frequency acceleration signals in the anteroposterior direction for sensing of bodily stress. The purpose of our investigation was to test a representative model of these new activity-based pacemakers (Relay) and compare it with current vibrationand housing pressure-sensing systems. We tested ten pacemaker patients with implanted Activitrax, Sensolog, and Relay systems during treadmill exercise testing with variable slopes. Devices from the three systems were also strapped externally to the chest of each patient and to ten normal test subjects in the control group. Exercise tests were conducted with changes of treadmill speed and/or treadmill slope. For comparable workloads during constant speed/variable slope and constant slope/variable speed, Relay had similar rate responses (difference not significant). Significant differences (P < 0.05) in rate adaptation attributable to the kind of treadmill exercise (change in treadmill speed or slopes) were observed in the housing pressure- and vibration-based pacemakers. Activity-based pacemakers with an acceleration sensor adapt pacing rates during treadmill exercises independent of treadmill speed or slope better than those controlled by a conventional housing pressure or vibration sensor.     

Comparison of Externally Strapped Versus Implanted Accelerometer- or Vibration-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers During Various Physical Activities

The ability of externally strapped accelerometer(Excel [Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.]) and vibration-based (Activitrax [Medtronic, Inc.]) rate adaptive pacemakers to reproduce the rate response of the same implanted devices with identical programming was evaluated in ten patients by ambulatory Holter monitoring. The resting and postexercise external pacemaker rates closely resembled those of the respective implanted devices. During short bursts and more prolonged exercise, both types of strapped-on devices underestimated maximal implanted pacemaker rate response by4%-10% when programmed to nominal rate adaptive settings. Studies evaluating chronotropic responses from either type of externally strapped activity sensor appear valid, provided the modest attenuation in maximal rate increase by this method is appreciated.     

Malfunction of the automatic slope adjustment of the QT sensor in patients with normal QT intervals

DDDR pacemakers with QT driven sensor algorithms may be susceptible to inappropriate pacemaker tachycardia when implanted into patients who have a relatively extended cardiac repolarization. The inability to detect and measure the QT interval at near maximum sensor rate, results in an inappropriate adjustment of the automatic QT slope. Triggering pacemaker induced tachycardia.     

Oxygen Uptake to Work Rate Relation Throughout Peak Exercise in Normal Subjects: Relevance for Rate Adaptive Pacemaker Programming

The oxygen uptake to work rate (VO2/WR) relationship observed throughout peak exercise testing is already being applied for rate adaptive pacemaker programming. However, the detailed curve design of VO2/WR with respect to the anaerobic threshold (AT) has not yet been investigated. It was the purpose of this study to determine the VO2/WR slope below and above the AT in a healthy control group. Seventy-eight healthy control subjects (45.9 +/- 17.4 years; 34 women: 49.9 +/- 18.6 years 44 men: 43.6 +/- 16.6 years) were exercised on a treadmill with "breath-by-breath" gas exchange monitoring using the symptom limited "ramping incremental treadmill exercise" (RITE) protocol. The slope of the VO2/WR relationship from rest to peak exercise (r-p), rest to AT (slope A), and AT to peak exercise (slope B) in mL oxygen uptake per watt of external treadmill work was determined by linear regression analysis. [table: see text] The oxygen uptake to work rate relationship throughout peak exercise in the entire study group generated a significant slope change at the AT (31%, P < 0.0001) with a decreasing slope during higher work load intensities. Female subjects demonstrated a greater percentage of slope change at AT (43%), as compared to men (22%, P < 0.01). When using the oxygen uptake to work rate relationship for the programming of the pacemaker's rate response to exercise, the significant slope change at the AT should be considered to more appropriately pace during higher work intensities supported by anaerobic metabolism. Female pacemaker patients should be programmed to generate a steeper VO2/WR slope below AT with a greater slope change at AT, as compared to men. Abnormally high oxygen uptake to work rate ratios above the AT may be possibly used as an indicator of overpacing.     

Electrocardiographic Manifestations of a Dual-Chamber, Rate-Modulated (DDDR) Pacemaker

Dual-chamber, rate-moduiated pacing (DDDR) has only recently been made available. During exercise, the pacemaker is capable of tracking not only the patient's intrinsic P wave but also the AV sequential sensor-indicated rate response, which depends on the programmed variables of the specific sensor in the DDDR pulse generator. Programmed options thaf affect the operation of a rate-modulated DDDR device are slope, threshold, reaction time, and recovery time. In addition, one is required to program a base or minimum pacing rate and a maximum tracking rate, as in any DDD device, as well as a maximum sensor rate. It is essential to know and understand all these programmed options if one is to correctly interpret electrocardiograms from a DDDR pacemaker. Interpreting the electrocardiograms also requires an understanding of the sensor-indicated rate of the pacemaker at any given level of exercise, which is determined by the options previously listed and the interaction between the sensor-indicated rate and the patient's intrinsic atrial and ventricular activity. This paper presents electrocardiograms typical of a new DDDR pacemaker undergoing clinical investigation.     

Incidence and Timing of Activity Parameter Changes in Activity Responsive Pacing Systems

The incidence and timing of rate response parameter reprogramming in activity responsive pacing systems during the year after implantation was evaluated in two groups of patients: 24 patients in whom a VVI,R system was implanted (Activitrax, Medtronic, Inc.), and 21 patients in whom a DDD,R system was implanted (Synchrony, Siemens Pacesetter, Inc.). Activity parameter changes in Activitrax patients were made based on the presence of symptoms, while in Synchrony patients, changes were based on objective data obtained using a sensor indicated rate histogram with a slow and fast walk protocol. No significant difference in the incidence of activity parameter reprogramming was noted at various time intervals during the first year in Activitrax patients; in Synchrony patients a greater incidence of reprogramming changes was noted at the 1-month follow-up visit compared to later follow-up visits (P less than 0.02). Further, the incidence of changes at 1 month was greater for Synchrony compared to Activitrax patients (P less than 0.001), while no difference was detected between groups at subsequent follow-up intervals. Use of the slow and fast walk protocol, by permitting serial evaluation of sensor response, demonstrated alterations in sensor drive rates with similar levels of activity over the initial 4 to 6 postimplant weeks. This may result from postoperative changes at the pacemaker insertion site. Based on this experience, predischarge programming may not predict long-term rate response requirements. We recommend evaluation of sensor function using an exercise protocol performed at 4 to 6 postimplant weeks in all rate responsive pacing systems that utilize a piezoelectric crystal.     

Usefulness and Adequacy of Sensor Data Storage and Retrieval for Rate Response Simulation

The usefulness of sensor data storage for rate response simulation was evaluated using a new dual chamber rate modulated pacemaker sensitive to acceleration forces (Relay 294–03 [lntermedics Inc.]). The pacemaker can store the sensor output during routine exercise and those values can be used to simulate rate profiles for other rate response settings. The predictive value of this feature was evaluated in three studies (mechanical, external pacemaker, and implanted pacemaker). In the first study, the pacemaker was submitted to three runs of eight different mechanical calibrated to-and-fro movements. In the second study, nine external pacemakers were strapped on healthy volunteers who performed three jogging tests. Finally, the predictive value of the simulation was studied in five implanted patients during three successive walking tests. In each study, the pacemaker was submitted three times to the same activity. The responsiveness was successively set to 5, 1, and 10, and the pacemaker outputs were continuously recorded on a Holter monitor. At the end of the first run, rate profile simulations for slopes 1 and 10 were performed; slope 5 rate response was simulated after the second run. A regression analysis was used to establish the correlation between predicted and achieved pacing rates for each study. The coefficients of correlation between predicted and measured pacing rates for the mechanical, external, and clinical studies were 0.999, 0.985, and 0.823, respectively. The corresponding slopes of regression lines were 1.005, 0.971, and 0.935. Calculated rate profile has a high predictive value and could be used to optimize rate responsive settings without serial exercise testings.     

Relationship Between Heart Rate and Oxygen Kinetics During Constant Workload Exercise

Background: Oxygen uptake during constant workload exercise increases exponentially from its resting value before reaching a steady state. The difference between the actual rate of oxygen consumption at the onset of exercise and the steady state is an oxygen deficit. Similarly, the normal sinus node increases its rate at the onset of exercise before achieving a steady state, thereby producing a heart rate deficit. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that elimination of the heart rate deficit by an instantaneous increase in heart rate at the onset of constant workload exercise to the steady-state level would reduce the oxygen deficit and improve the perceived difficulty of exertion as compared with the chronotropic response of the normal sinus node. Methods and Results: Ten subjects with normal sinus node function who had DDD pacemakers implanted for A V block completed a symptom-limited maximal treadmill exercise test using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol (CAEP) to assess sinus node function, maximal heart rate, and VO_{2 max}. The subjects then performed constant workload exercise tests (6-min duration) at a workload equal to approximately 50% of metabolic reserve with the pacemaker randomly programmed to each of three patterns of chronotropic response: (1) DDD (lower rate 60 beats/ min); (2) Fast (lower rate abruptly programmed to the expected value at 50% metabolic reserve); and (3) Overpaced (lower rate at least 80% of the age predicted maximum). The oxygen deficit was lower with the fast chronotropic response (434 ± 238 ml O₂) than with either the DDD (512 ± 233; P = 0.02), or overpaced chronotropic patterns (488 ± 238; P = 0.02 vs fast). The rate constant for change in VO₂ was highest with the fast chronotropic pattern (2.85 ± 1.38) compared with either the DDD (2.25 ± 0.64; P = 0.01) or overpaced (2.38 ± 0.43; P = 0.02) patterns. The Borg perceived exertion rating was lowest with the fast chronotropic response (P = 0.02 vs DDD and P = 0.02 vs overpaced). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that oxygen kinetics and exertional symptoms are improved by an abrupt increase in pacing rate at the onset of exercise to a value that is appropriate for metabolic demand as compared with the DDD pacing mode in patients with normal sinus node function. In contrast, an overly aggressive chronotropic response was not associated with improved oxygen kinetics or exertional symptoms.     

Behavior of a Respiratory Driven Pacemaker and Direct Respiratory Measurements

In 10 patients with a mean age of 76 +/- 8 years, a rate responsive pacemaker (Meta-MV, Telectronics) was implanted in the left pectoral site. An exercise test was performed in SSI ("adaptive") mode, allowing the device to measure the changes in thoracic impedance. The "slope number" at maximal exercise was chosen to program the pacemaker for a second exercise test in rate responsive mode. Direct measurements of respiratory rate and minute volume were correlated with the pacing rate. After 1 minute of exercise, pacing rate increased by 6% and it decreased smoothly after maximal exercise. The programmed maximal rate was reached at the maximum exercise level in six patients. During 24-hour Holter recording, the mean maximal pacing rate was 103 +/- 18 beats/min. For individual patients, a good correlation of pacing rate with respiratory rate (r = 0.757), oxygen consumption (r = 0.731), and minute volume (r = 0.800) was observed. The data from the entire group showed a highly significant correlation of changes in pacing rate and in respiratory parameters for different levels of exercise and recovery. In a subgroup of five patients, the slope numbers at maximal exercise were reproducible after 10 months. It was concluded that minute volume and its changes were recognized in a reliable way by the Meta-MV pacemaker.