The sinus node electrogram in the evaluation of atrial pauses

The aim of this study was to establish the electrophysiological mechanism of atrial pauses, defined as a sudden lengthening of atrial cycle greater than or equal to 10% of its basal value. The sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded during electrophysiological study in 20 subjects. Satisfactory recordings of 64 pauses were obtained, 25 of which were spontaneous, 16 were induced by short periods of atrial pacing (AP) in normal subjects, whereas 23 atrial pauses were induced with the premature stimulation method. The basal sinus cycle and the one during the spontaneous pauses were measured from the upstroke slope on the SNE. The electrically induced pauses of the sinus cycle were measured from the artifact of the stimulus to the upstroke slope of the SNE of the first post-pacing beat. We have found that: 1-spontaneous atrial pauses correspond to a moderate slowing of the sinus cycle and to a depression of the sinoatrial conduction occasionally up to a second degree sinoatrial block. Only in subjects with sick sinus disease, the atrial pauses are induced by depression of the sinus automatism; 2-in normal subjects the AP results in a sinoatrial conduction delay; 3-the single extrastimulus regularly produces a moderate increase of the sinoatrial conduction time with variable but minimal effects on the sinus node automatism.     

Postextrasystolic sinoatrial exit block in human sick sinus syndrome: demonstration by direct recording of sinus node electrograms.

Ten patients with sick sinus syndrome having repetitive sinus node electrograms during long postpacing pauses were studied during programmed atrial stimulation. Sinus node activity was recorded using a percutaneous catheter electrode. A sinus node electrogram was recorded before the return atrial beat in seven patients; it was similar to the sinus node electrogram observed during postpacing pauses and is clearly identified because sinoatrial conduction time was markedly prolonged following the atrial extra beat. Complete sinoatrial exit block occurred in four patients. (1) Sinus node electrograms were thus validated both during postpacing pauses and during programmed atrial stimulation in most patients with sick sinus syndrome. (2) Sinoatrial conduction time was markedly prolonged after one extrasystole, accounting for supracompensatory atrial return cycles. (3) If it were cumulative following multiple extrasystoles, this effect could constitute the electrophysiologic link between an abnormal response during programmed atrial stimulation and the complete sinoatrial block recorded during the pauses that follow rapid atrial pacing.     

Sinus automaticity and sinoatrial conduction in severe symptomatic sick sinus syndrome.

Electrophysiologic studies with recordings of sinus node electrograms were performed in 38 patients with severe symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. Thirty-two of the 38 patients had episodic tachyarrhythmias and 17 presented with syncope. The clinically documented sinus or atrial pause was 5.6 +/- 2.8 s (mean +/- SD). Patients were divided into three groups according to electrophysiologic findings. Group I consisted of nine patients with complete sinoatrial block. Sinus node electrograms were recorded during the episodes of long pauses. Seven patients had unidirectional exit block, with the atrial impulse being capable of retrograde penetration to the sinus node causing suppression of sinus automaticity; two had bidirectional sinoatrial block. Group II consisted of 22 patients with either 1:1 sinoatrial conduction (group IIa = 13 patients) or second degree sinoatrial exit block (group IIb = 9 patients) during spontaneous sinus rhythm. Sinoatrial exit block, ranging from 1 to greater than 14 sinus beats, was observed during postpacing pauses that ranged from 1,650 to 37,000 ms (mean 7,286 +/- 6,989). The maximal sinus node recovery time ranged from 770 to 5,580 ms (mean 3,004 +/- 1,686) and was normal in 5 patients and prolonged in 17. Group III consisted of seven patients with no recordable sinus node electrogram, reflecting either a technical failure or a quiescence of sinus activity. The sinus node recovery time in these seven patients ranged from 1,190 to 4,260 ms (mean 2,949 +/- 1,121). Thus, abnormalities in both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction are responsible for the long sinus or atrial pauses in the sick sinus syndrome. However, complete sinoatrial exit block can occur and cause severe bradycardia with escape rhythm; repetitive sinoatrial exit block plays a major role in producing posttachycardia pauses.     

Intra-sinus echo: demonstration using direct intracavitary recording of the sinus potential

The authors searched for intra-sinusal echos during electrophysiological investigation of 53 patients (41 men, 12 women, average age: 61 +/- 12 years). Cycles of sinus echos were recorded in 8 patients (15 per cent). The period during which sinus echos could be recorded was 125 ms (average 40.6 +/- 34 ms). Indirect assessment of sinus node function in patients with sinus echos was normal (corrected sinus node recovery time, estimated atrio-sino atrial conduction times using Narula's technique). A valid and reproducible direct recording of the sinus node potential was only possible in one patient. In this case the echo cycles were provoked by stimulation periods of between 440 and 320 ms (echo zone of 120 ms). All the echos obtained were preceded by a sinus node potential with a different duration and morphology to that observed during basal sinus cycles (respective sino-atrial conduction times 105 and 115 ms). In this patient we were also able to induce sinus echos after a single extrastimulus during the spontaneous rhythm. the echo zone was 130 ms and with a shorter coupling interval (310 ms) two successive sinus echos were recorded. The demonstration of intrasinusal echos by direct recording of the sinus node potential supports the experimental data of Allessie and Bonke on isolated right atrial tissues of the rabbit. Improvements in the technique of endocavitary direct recording of the sinus node potential in man should complete this data by showing the possibility of sinoatrial tachycardias due to reentry.     

Sinoatrial and intra-atrial conductive disorders. The value of recording the sinus node potential

Direct recording of the sinus node potential in the bipolar mode using two electrodes of a quadripolar recording catheter positioned in the region of the sinus node at the junction of the superior vena cava to the right atrium was performed in 24 patients. Asynchronous overdrive atrial pacing was carried out using Strauss 'technique. Pharmacological denervation was carried out using intravenous propranolol (0,02 mg/kg) and atropine (0,04 mg/kg) using Jose's technique. An intravenous injection of a bolus of 20 mg of ATP was given in 3 cases. The sinus potential was identified by morphological criteria and confirmed after carotid sinus compression and atrial extrastimuli to exclude artefacts, especially the end of ventricular repolarisation of the preceding complex. The sinoatrial conduction time measured directly under basal conditions was considered normal when within 80 to 150 ms. Direct measurement of the sinus potential in the diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction seems to be less useful than the indirect techniques. On the other hand, it does confirm the diagnosis of sinoatrial block: five cases of special interest are described; in four cases the degree of sinoatrial block was variable: a significant increase of sinoatrial conduction time under basal conditions in 1 case; paroxysmal 3rd degree sinoatrial block revealed by programmed atrial stimulation in 2 cases; 2nd degree 2/1 sinoatrial block after injection of ATP in which the direct sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node function had been considered to be normal (1 case).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Intracellular and extracellular recordings of sinus node activity: comparison with estimated sinoatrial conduction times during pacemaker shifts in rabbit heart

Sinoatrial conduction times, estimated by premature atrial stimulation, were compared with direct measurement of the sinoatrial conduction time in 15 isolated rabbit sinus node preparations before and after intrasinusal pacemaker shifts induced by cooling. Transmembrane potentials and surface electrograms were recorded from the sinus node and crista terminalis. Extracellular sinus node activity was recorded in five preparations. Mapping was performed at 38 degrees C and 35 degrees C to determine the site of the dominant pacemaker. The sinus cycle was significantly longer at 35 degrees C (319.4 ms vs 258.1 ms). Intracellular measured conduction time was significantly shorter (63.8 ms vs 70.4 ms) because of caudal shift of the dominant pacemaker. Estimated sinoatrial conduction time was significantly longer (110.3 ms vs 85.4 ms) owing to the depression of automaticity by the extrastimulus. Extracellular measured conduction time did not differ significantly from intracellular measured conduction time. These results suggest that intrasinusal pacemaker shift may explain inaccuracies in indirect estimations of sinoatrial conduction time by atrial pacing techniques. Extracellular recordings appear to be a better method of evaluating sinoatrial conduction times.     

Physiopathology of the sinus node and sinoatrial conduction

New information about the pathophysiology of the sinus node and sino-atrial conduction has been published in the last few years. The sinus node consists of cells separated by a network of collagen fibres. This anatomical disparity explains the different electrophysiological characteristics of the node; the morphology of cellular action potentials depends on the site of recording. The dominant and most automatic pacemaker cells are situated in the cephalic region and the latent pacemaker cells in the caudal region. However, synchronisation of these different cellular activities is possible and results in a coherent signal. This complex synchronisation has been the object of several recent papers. The phenomenon of intrasinusal pacemaker shift and the stimuli which induce it have been studied in depth. In general, positive chronotropic stimuli tend to shift the dominant pacemaker towards the cephalic part and negative chronotropic stimuli towards the caudal part of the node. It is possible to assess pacemaker shift clinically and this phenomenon must be taken into consideration when studying sinus node function. Intercellular conduction and especially electrotonic conduction does not play a role in the genesis of the flux, which represents spontaneous cellular automatism, but in its mode of expression, that is to say the sinus rhythm. The pathophysiology of sinoatrial block is complex because it may be situated within and/or around the sinus node. The extrinsic or intrinsic mechanisms of these blocks may be interrelated. Variations in sinus rhythm must be taken into account in the genesis of sinoatrial block; an acceleration in rhythm may block conduction in the perisinusal region. Finally, our knowledge of the ionic fluxes underlying sinus automatism has also improved with individualization of the pacemaker current (if).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sinus node electric activity in prolonged atrial pauses in subjects with the sick sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded in 15 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in which prolonged atrial pauses were observed. The aim of this study was clarify the physiopathological mechanisms underlying atrial pauses as well as to evaluate the sensitivity of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) directly measured on SNE and of SACT estimated with the indirect Strauss method with respect to the detection of SSS. The following results were obtained: Sinus electrical activity was recorded during atrial pauses (greater than or equal to 2 basic sinus cycle length) in all the 9 patients in which the pauses spontaneously occurred and in the 2 patients in whom the pauses of 2860 and 3190 msec were induced by atrial pacing. In one of these latter two patients, moreover, a complete electrical desynchronization was observed. In the remaining 4 patients in whom, pauses (greater than or equal to 3 sec) were induced by carotid sinus massage of in 3 no sinus electrical activity was detected on SNE while in 1 advanced sinus node desynchronization was observed. Direct sinoatrial conduction time was abnormally prolonged in 6 patients with SSS and indirect sinoatrial conduction time in 9 patients.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Sinus node electrogram recording in 59 patients. Comparison with simultaneous estimation of sinoatrial conduction using premature atrial stimulation.

Directly measured sinoatrial conduction time was compared with sinoatrial conduction time assessed simultaneously by the single premature atrial stimulus technique in 59 patients: 20 with normal sinus function, 35 with sinus dysfunction, and four with sinus bradycardia but negative indirect methods. In patients with normal sinus function direct sinoatrial conduction time was 102.5 +/- 34 ms (mean +/- 2 SD) and was identical to indirect sinoatrial conduction time. Neither direct sinoatrial conduction time in the basal and return cycle, nor post-return and basal cycle lengths were different. Sinoatrial and atriosinus conduction durations were similar. In sinus dysfunction direct sinoatrial conduction time (average 160 +/- 47 ms) was longer than in normal sinus function. Prolonged direct sinoatrial conduction time may therefore be considered as a criterion of sinus dysfunction. In sinus dysfunction no significant correlation was observed between direct and indirect sinoatrial conduction times. Direct sinoatrial conduction time was equal to (17 patients), longer than (12 patients), or shorter than (six patients) indirect sinoatrial conduction time. These differences can be explained by delayed or incomplete premature depolarisation penetration into the sinus node rather than by the classical pacemaker shift.     

The effect of atropine on calculated sinoatrial conduction time in man.

This study investigates the effect of atropine on the length of the return cycles after premature atrial stimulation in man. On the assumption that sinus node automaticity is not changed by premature depolarization of the sinus node, sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) was calculated from the differences between the length of the return cycles and the spontaneous cycle length. 11 patients were studied before and after the injection of atropine. In all cases atropine caused an increase in heart rate. In 8 patients the return cycles exhibited a typical behavior. In 6 patients without signs of sinus node dysfunction, the mean calculated SACT was 109 msec, whereas 2 patients with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) had a mean calculated SACT of 190 and 225 msec, respectively. 3 patients with SSS demonstrated an atypical pattern of the postextrasystolic pauses. In 6 patients without sinus node dysfunction, atropine caused a reduction of calculated SACT about 35%. In 2 patients with SSS the reduction was 38 and 49% of the control value, respectively, whereas in the remaining 3 patients with SSS who had an atypical return cycle pattern, a normalization occurred after the administration of atropine. We conclude that, besides its effects on sinus node automaticity, atropine has also a marked effect on sinoatrial conduction, even in patients with the sick sinus syndrome.     

Assessment of sinus node function in patients with congenital long QT syndrome

Sinus node function was evaluated in 4 patients with congenital long QT syndrome suffering from recurrent episodes of syncope and ventricular arrhythymias. Three of the 4 patients had bradycardia at rest on a 24-hour ECG. Sinus node function was examined by the atrial overdrive suppression test and the atrial premature stimulation test. Corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) was prolonged in all patients. Total sinoatrial conduction time was also prolonged in 2 of the 4 patients. In all patients with abnormally high values, these values returned to normal after atropine administration, except in one patient. His prolonged CSNRT remained high after atropine administration, indicating abnormal automaticity such as that seen in sick sinus syndrome. These results show that sinus node function in congenital long QT syndrome is often associated with autonomic dysfunction, and sometimes with intrinsic disturbances of sinoatrial conduction.     

Direct stimulation of the sinus node in man. A possible explanation for an unusual finding during premature atrial stimulation.

An atypical behavior of the postextrasystolic pauses was observed in a 19-yr-old patient studied by His bundle electrography and programmed premature atrial stimulation. In the normal case there is a prolongation of the postextrasystolic pauses compared to the spontaneous cycle length allowing calculation of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT). In this case there were constant postextrasystolic pauses during the whole range of prematurity which were identical to the spontaneous cycle length. It is suggested that the catheter tip was accidentally positioned at the sinus node itself. The lengths of the spontaneous cycles, of the return cycles, and of the postreturn cycles showed no significant differences. Thus, one may assume that sinus node automaticity was not influenced in this case.     

Selective experimental chelation of calcium in the AV node and His bundle

There are P cells in the human and canine AV (atrioventricular) node which are virtually devoid of gap junctions. All other components of myocardial cellular connections are calcium-dependent except the gap junction. Direct perfusion of disodium EDTA through the AV node artery of 16 anaesthetized dogs produced three immediate effects: complete AV block, a rapid irregular atrial rhythm and a separate rapid irregular ventricular rhythm. The atrial arrhythmia was short in duration and sinus rhythm resumed, initially with complete AV and VA block; both waned until normal AV conduction returned in each dog. In 3 of the 16 dogs there was transient complete AV block during which two independent His potentials were separately associated with the atrial and ventricular complexes. When conducted sinus rhythm resumed, there was initially A-H prolongation (but not H-V). Atropine, propranolol and reserpine had no influence on any electrophysiologic effect of EDTA. Both tachycardias probably originate in P cells of the AV node, the irregularity being attributable to varying enhancement of automaticity plus functional disaggregation of P cells. AV block is attributed to failure of conduction between disaggregated P cells, which in turn must be an obligatory pathway for normal AV conduction, because of their anatomic interposition. The findings further suggest that the AV nodal P cells are the site of the normal 40 ms delay in AV conduction, and that they may be the site of origin of the His potential.     

Sinus node automaticity during atrial fibrillation in isolated rabbit hearts.

BACKGROUND. It is still unclear what role the sinus node may play in the genesis or perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, we studied the electrical activity in different regions of the sinus node during atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS. In Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, paroxysms of atrial fibrillation were induced by burst pacing. Standard microelectrode techniques were used to record transmembrane potentials from different regions of the sinus node. We found that during atrial fibrillation, a high degree (5:1) of sinoatrial entrance block was present that protected the pacemaker fibers in the center of the sinus node against the high rate of fibrillatory impulses. As a result, the true pacemaker fibers in the center of the node were activated with only a slightly higher average rate than during sinus rhythm. Spontaneous diastolic depolarization was still present but was modulated by electrotonic depolarizations due to intranodal conduction block of atrial fibrillatory impulses. Incidentally, phase 4 depolarization resulted in the generation of spontaneous action potentials in the sinus node. However, the high activation rate in the sinoatrial border during atrial fibrillation prevented these spontaneous impulses to exit from the sinus node. Because of the minimal degree of sinus node overdrive suppression (9%) and the presence of concealed automaticity during atrial fibrillation, spontaneous termination of atrial fibrillation was promptly followed by resumption of normal sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS. During atrial fibrillation, sinus automaticity still is present in the center of the sinus node and hardly overdrive suppressed due to a high degree of sinoatrial entrance block.     

Measured and estimated sinoatrial conduction during variations in rhythm. Microelectrode study of the isolated rabbit atrium

Strips of isolated atrium were obtained from 10 rabbits to study the validity of indirect methods of estimating sinoatrial conduction time during variations of the sinus rhythm. Direct recordings of the trans-membrane action potential of the sinus node were made. Mapping of the sinus region was undertaken to determine the site of the dominant pacemaker. A quadripolar surface electrode was positioned on the lower part of the crista terminalis for stimulation and recording of the atrial potential. This enabled a comparison to be made between the indirect estimated and the directly measured conduction times. An intrasinusal shift of the dominant pacemaker was obtained by cooling from 38 degrees C to 35 degrees C. This shift occurs progressively in the cranino-candal direction. The estimated and measured conduction times were compared under basal conditions and after cooling. The sinus cycle was significantly longer (p less than 0.001) at 35 degrees C (318 +/- 68 ms) than at 38 degrees C (255 +/- 48 ms). The mean measured anterograde conduction time also decreased from 36 to 31 ms (p less than 0.01) and the mean measured retrograde conduction time also decreased from 39 to 33 ms (p less than 0.02); the total conduction time decreased from 75 to 64 ms (p less than 0.001). The results of the total estimated conduction times were discordant. The associated effects of stimulation and cooling can cause conduction defects and an overestimation of the conduction time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of premature atrial depolarization on sinus node automaticity in man.

Sino-atrial conduction time (SACT) may be calculated from the difference between the length of the return cycle and the spontaneous cycle, using programmed premature atrial stimulation during spontaneous sinus rhythm. This approach to sinoatrial conduction assumes that sinus node automaticity is not changed by premature depolarization. In order to validate this assumption, we compared the length of the post-return cycles to the spontaneous cycle length in 71 patients. Patients were grouped according to clinical diagnosis and the value of calculated SACT. At long coupling intervals at which no reset of the sinus node occurred there was only a small prolongation of the post-return cycles (less than 8.4 msec, on an average) compared to the spontaneous cycle length. This suggests no or only an insignificant effect of premature depolarization on the sinus node. However, during test stimuli leading to reset of the sinus node, the post-return cycles were significantly prolonged between 20 to 30 msec, on an average. The response of the individual cases sometimes varied to a great extent. In patients who demonstrated a progressive linear prolongation of the return cycles at decremental shortening of the test interval, there was no significant prolongation of the post-return cycles versus the spontaneous cycle length. We conclude that 1) premature depolarization of the sinus node may have a depressant effect on sinus node automaticity, which, if present, is usually small; 2) calculation of SACT using the extrastimulus technique may overestimate true SACT.     

Sinus node echoes and concealed concealed conduction: additional sinus node phenomena confirmed in man by direct sinus node electrography

Direct sinus node electrography has been previously used to assess several aspects of sinus node physiology: sinus node pauses, overdrive suppression, sinoatrial entrance block. This report presents data in which sinus node electrograms confirm two additional physiologic phenomena in man: concealed conduction in the sinoatrial junction and sinus node reentry. These findings verify the presence of previously suspected phenomena by careful deductive analysis of electrocardiographic and electrographic tracings.     

Mobitz type II suprahisian atrioventricular block : block in the subnodal-suprahisian (NH) zone?

The electrophysiological properties of the atrioventricular node differ from those of the His bundle. Nodal conduction is always decremential; this is its principal physiological characteristic, and accounts for the fact that almost the only form of block found at this level is Wenckebach block. The His bundle is characterised by an all-or-nothing response and usually blocks in the Mobitz II mode. Wenckebach phenomena have been described in the His Purkinje system, but Mobitz II block has not been reported in the atrioventricular node. Similarly, phase IV paradoxical block is found in the His Purkinje system but has not been described in the atrioventricular node in the absence of vagal phenomena. In addition, the atrioventricular node is very sensitive to the influence of the autonomic nervous system, the His bundle much less so. The first patient had a normal resting electrocardiogram showing sinus rhythm; second degree atrioventricular block was observed when the atrial rhythm was increased by exercise, atropine or atrial pacing. His bundle recordings showed the block to be suprahisian; the blocked atrial potentials were not followed by a His potential, whilst the conducted atrial activity was followed by a normal His potential and a normal HV interval. However, this atrioventricular block was of the Mobitz II and not the expected Mobitz I type, conduction to the ventricles suddenly blocking (with a 3/2 or 2/1 response) when the atrial rate was increased, without obvious lengthening of the PR or AH intervals before the blocked atria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)