Hilar glissonean access to vascular-secretory elements in anatomical segmental liver resections

It still remains unclear which patients with hepatic tumors can favour anatomical segmental liver resections instead of major liver resection. Short term results of anatomical segmental liver resection are evaluated and analyzed. Ten patients underwent the anatomical segmental liver resection performed by posterior approach with taping of anterior right hepatic vein. Seven patients had liver metastases of colorectal cancer, one had primary hepatic carcinoma and two had benign lesions, anatomical segmental liver resection were performed without Pringle maneuver. There was no significant difference in blood loss, duration of the procedure, postoperative hospital stay and morbidity in comparison with the segmental liver resection performed by anterior approach. Multiple, large and deep-embedded lesions were removed completely, with tumor-free resection margins. Anatomical segmental liver resection performed by hilar glissonean approach is recommended in patients with compromised liver function "unfavourable" liver anatomy to replace major liver resection provides removal of only affected part of the liver accordingly to its true anatomical borders.     

Hepatic resection for primary and metastatic tumors

Thirty-four hepatic resections were performed on 33 patients. These included 4 trisegmentectomies, 14 lobectomies, 7 segmentectomies, and 9 wedge resections. Twenty patients had metastatic colorectal cancer, 4 had a primary liver tumor, 2 had giant cavernous hemangioma, 1 had metastatic leiomyosarcoma, 5 had various benign lesions including focal nodular hyperplasia, and 1 patient had resection for trauma. Operative morbidity included four subphrenic abscesses, one bile leak, one bile duct injury, one case of cholestasis, and one case of phlebitis. There were no operative deaths. The median survival of the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was 40 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 35 percent. Survival rates were not significantly different between patients with a solitary metastasis and those with multiple lesions and was not influenced by size of the metastases. However, survival was significantly better in patients whose primary colorectal lesion was Dukes' B as compared with those whose lesion was Dukes' C. The results indicate that liver resection can be performed safely with acceptable morbidity and improved long-term survival.     

Formal hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ploidy and prognosis.

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent 52 formal hepatic resections (excluding isolated wedge resections) for metastatic colorectal cancer were analyzed to determine whether DNA content was of prognostic significance. The Dukes' stages of the colorectal primaries were: A (10%), B (20%), C (40%), D (28%), and unknown in 2%. Four patients whose liver metastases were discovered at the time of resection of the primary bowel cancer underwent concomitant liver resection, and the remaining patients underwent delayed resections. The hepatic resections performed were right lobectomy (50%), extended right lobectomy (19%), left lobectomy (13%), left lateral segmentectomy (6%), left lobectomy and right wedge (6%), extended left lobectomy (4%), and right lobectomy and left wedge (2%). The overall morbidity rate was 29%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9%. As of November 1991, 36 patients have recurred. The 5-year actuarial survival was 28%. Flow cytometry could be performed on 37 archival specimens, 15 of which were found to be diploid whereas 22 were aneuploid. All metastases from Dukes A colorectal primaries demonstrated a diploid DNA content. In addition, there was no difference in actuarial survival between diploid and aneuploid tumors. These data suggest that in selected patients, formal hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases can be performed with an acceptable morbidity rate, mortality rate, and survival, but ploidy of the resected tumor is not of prognostic significance.     

Impact of the Degree of Liver Resection on Survival for Patients with Multiple Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: Although the degree of hepatic resection has been found to be a key aspect of tumor stimulation, the differences in clinical outcome between a massive liver resection and a less extensive resection for multiple colorectal metastases have not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to clarify the impact of the extent of liver resection on survival outcome. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were available for 85 patients who were surgically treated for four or more liver metastases. Forty-nine patients who underwent a major hepatic resection were compared with patients who underwent minor hepatic resections (n = 36). RESULTS: As the patients undergoing major resection were more likely to have multiple (p = 0.014) and large tumors (p = 0.021) compared to the minor-resection patients, their overall survival was worse (p = 0.046) and the disease-free rate tended to be poorer. By multivariate analysis of the cohorts, the only independent factor affecting survival was the number of liver tumors (/=6; relative risk [RR] = 0.427; p = 0.014). When patients with six or more metastases were selected and analyzed, the overall survival of patients who had a major resection was significantly poorer than those who had minor resections (p = 0.028), although the clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although the extent of hepatectomy was not an independent prognosticator, minor resections for multiple colorectal metastases may offer a long-term survival advantage compared to a major resection.     

Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The precise role of laparoscopy in resection of liver malignancies (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and liver metastases) remains controversial despite an increasing number of publications reporting laparoscopic resection of benign liver tumors. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 11 surgical centers in Europe regarding their experience with laparoscopic resection of liver malignancies. Detailed questionnaires were sent to each surgeon focusing on patient characteristics, clinical data, type and characteristics of the tumor, technical details of the operation, and early and late clinical outcome. All patients had radiologic investigations at follow-up to exclude disease recurrence. RESULTS: From February 1994 to December 2000, 37 patients with malignant liver tumors were included in this study. Ten patients had HCC, including 9 with cirrhotic liver, and 27 patients had liver metastases. The mean tumor size was 3.3 cm, and 89% of the tumors were located in the left lobe or in the anterior segments of the right liver. Liver procedures included 12 wedge resections, 9 segmentectomies, 14 bisegmentectomies (including 13 left lateral segmentectomies), and 2 major hepatectomies. The transfusion rate, the use of pedicular clamping, the conversion rate (13.5% in the whole series), and the complication rate were significantly greater in patients with HCC. There were no deaths. Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (22%). The surgical margin was less than 1 cm in 30% of the patients. During a mean follow-up of 14 months, the 2-year disease-free survival was 44% for patients with HCC and 53% for patients having hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. No port-site metastases were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small malignant tumors, located in the left lateral segments or in the anterior segments of the right liver, laparoscopic resection is feasible and safe. The complication rate is low, except in patients with HCC on cirrhotic liver. By using laparoscopic ultrasound, a 1-cm free surgical margin should be routinely obtained. The late outcome needs to be evaluated in expert centers.     

Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer

From 1975 to 1985, 60 patients with isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer were treated by 17 right trisegmentectomies, five left trisegmentectomies, 20 right lobectomies, seven left lobectomies, eight left lateral segmentectomies, and three nonanatomic wedge resections. The 1-month operative mortality rate was 0%. One- to 5-year actuarial survival rates of the 60 patients were 95%, 72%, 53%, 45%, and 45%, respectively. The survival rate after liver resection was the same when solitary lesions were compared with multiple lesions. However, none of the seven patients with four or more lesions survived 3 years. The interval after colorectal resection did not influence the survival rate after liver resection, and survival rates did not differ statistically when synchronous metastases were compared with metachronous tumors. A significant survival advantage of patients with Dukes' B primary lesions was noted when compared with Dukes' C and D lesions. The pattern of tumor recurrence after liver resection appeared to be systemic rather than hepatic. The patients who received systemic chemotherapy before clinical evidence of tumor recurrence after liver resection survived longer than those who did not.     

Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND: We reviewed 36 patients with liver metastases from islet cell tumors of the pancreas (n = 18) and carcinoid tumors (n = 18) who were treated with surgical resection (n = 16) or hepatic chemoembolization (n = 20). METHODS: All resections were complete and included 4 lobectomies, 6 segmental resections, and 6 wedge resections. There were no operative deaths. RESULTS: Median survival has not yet been reached, and the actuarial 5-year survival rate is 70%. Prognostic variables associated with improved disease-free survival included prior resection of the primary tumor and 4 or fewer metastases resected (P <.05). With an average of 3 chemoembolization procedures per patient, 17 of 20 patients (90%) demonstrated either a significant radiographic response (n = 5), stabilization of tumor mass (n = 2), or improvement of clinical symptoms (n = 10). Factors related to a sustained response (more then 1 year) included surgical resection of the primary tumor, 4 or more chemoembolization procedures, and liver metastases of 5 cm or smaller. Median survival after treatment was 32 months (range, 7-63 months), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors provides the best chance for extended survival. Chemoembolization effectively improves clinical symptoms and, in selected patients, may provide sustained tumor control.     

结直肠癌肝转移的外科治疗

目的　探讨结、直肠癌肝转移的外科治疗。方法　对１９９３ 年１ 月至１９９９ 年１ 月的１９ 例结、直肠癌肝转移患者行外科治疗。其中６ 例同期切除,１０ 例分期切除,１ 例肝动脉结扎加无水乙醇注射,２ 例通过肝动脉结扎加化学药物治疗（化疗） 泵灌注化疗而获得二期手术切除机会。手术方式行肝不规则楔形切除１６ 例,左半肝切除２ 例。结果　术后１、３、５ 年生存率分别为８９％ 、５８％ 、２１％ 。６ 例同期肝切除者平均生存期２３ 个月,１０ 例分期肝切除者的平均生存期为３２ 个月。结论　掌握手术时机和适应证,积极进行肝动脉灌注化疗,提高手术切除成功率是提高存活率的关键。     

Hepatic resections for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The present study was performed to assess survival benefits in patients who underwent a hepatic resection for isolated bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Thirty-eight patients underwent a curative hepatic resection for isolated colorectal liver metastasis. Among them, 11 patients had bilobar liver metastases and 19 had a solitary metastasis. The remaining 8 patients had unilobar multiple lesions. We investigated survival in two groups those with bilobar and those with solitary metastatic tumors. Survival and disease-free survival were 36% and 18% at 5 years, respectively, in the patients with bilobar liver metastases, while these survivals were 43% and 34% in the patients with solitary liver metastasis. In the 38 patients, repeated hepatic resections were performed in 15 patients with recurrent liver disease. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates for these patients were 38% and 27%, respectively, after the second hepatic resections. Of the 11 patients with bilobar liver metastases, 5 underwent a repeated hepatic resection, and they all survived for over 42 months. Based on our observations, a hepatic resection was thus found to be effective even in selected patients with either bilobar nodules or recurrence in the remnant liver. Received: February 7, 2000 / Accepted: April 26, 2000     

Patterns of failure after surgical cure of large liver tumors: A change in the proximate cause of death and a need for effective systemic adjuvant therapy

During a period of 7 years, we have aggressively treated liver tumors whether primary or metastatic. Our experience after 43 curative major liver resections has shown an excellent overall survival: 34 of 43 patients still alive a median of 12 months after liver resection (patient ages ranged from 21 to 85 years, median 57 years). Nineteen patients underwent right hepatic lobectomy, 9 trisegmentectomy, 5 left hepatic lobectomy, 5 extended left hepatic lobectomy, 4 right lobectomy plus left lobe wedge resection, and 1 patient underwent a major hilar wedge resection. Two patients died from sepsis and hepatic failure on or before the 60th postoperative day. One patient with no evidence of recurrent colorectal cancer was lost to follow-up after 2.5 years. One patient died without cancer 12 months after left hepatic lobectomy for colon cancer metastases. Cumulative survival for the entire series and for patients after resection of colorectal cancer metastases was the same: 1 year survival 90 percent; 2 year survival 75 percent, and 3 year survival 65 percent. Seventeen of 30 patients remain disease-free after resection of liver metastases. Of the 13 who had recurrence, 8 are still alive. Ten recurrences were outside of the residual liver (predominantly multiple pulmonary metastases). One recurrence was in the right hemidiaphragm, and only three were in the residual or regenerated liver. Serial carcinoembryonic antigen analysis was the best indicator of recurrence in these 13 patients, 12 of whom were asymptomatic. These data confirm that major liver resection can be performed with minimum postoperative mortality (4.7 percent in this series). More importantly, the majority of patients were cured of their liver metastases. The next goal should be the initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy trials after liver resection in such patients.     

Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

We studied 141 patients who had resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, considering all such lesions removed between 1948 and 1982. The study involved extended observations of patients described previously. Also included were 21 patients who had wedge resections of small metastases done since 1976, who, therefore, did not qualify for analysis of major hepatic resections reported recently (1980 and 1983). The overall five-year survival rate was 25%, significantly higher than that of a group of historical controls who had resectable metastases that were not removed. The size and nature of our extended sample allowed identification of some determinants of favorable prognosis: Dukes' stage of the primary lesion, absence of extrahepatic metastases, and being female. Contrary to our earlier observations, this study justified removal of some multiple hepatic metastases.     

Complete hepatic resection of metastases from leiohyosarcoma prolongs survival

Although liver resection has been shown to prolong survival in selected patients with metastases from colorectal cancer, the benefit for other metastatic tumors is unproved. To determine whether hepatic resection has a role in the management of metastatic leiomyosarcoma, medical records from 11 consecutive patients who underwent resection of isolated metastases from leiomyosarcoma between 1984 and 1995 were reviewed. All liver resections were for leiomyosarcomas originating in the viscera (n = 6) or retroperitoneum (n = 5). The average disease-free interval was 16 months. Five of 11 primary tumors were classified as low grade, whereas six were high grade. Hepatic resections included lobectomy or extended lobectomy (n = 4), segmentectomy and/or wedge resection (n = 5), and complex resection (n = 2). There were no operative deaths. Median survival of all patients after liver resection was 39 months. Patients who underwent complete resection of hepatic metastases (n = 6) had a significantly longer survival than those who had incomplete resections (n = 5) (P = 0.03, log-rank test). Furthermore, five of six patients who underwent complete resection are alive after hepatectomy with a median follow-up of 53 months. Therefore, in selected patients with isolated liver metastases from visceral and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas, complete resection of hepatic metastases results in prolonged survival. Presented in part at the Fiftieth Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, Ill., March 20–23, 1997.     

Multiple primary carcinomas of the colon and associated extracolonic primary malignant tumors.

A review of 308 cases of colorectal carcinoma showed 12 cases (3.9%) of colorectal multiple primary malignant tumors and 14 cases (4.5%) of colorectal primary malignant tumor associated with extracolonic primary malignant tumor. A total of 60 tumors was involved: 14 each in the sigmoid and transverse colon; eight in the cecum; six in the rectum; one each in the ascending and descending colons; three each in the bladder and prostate; two each in the breast, cervix, and lung; and one each in the skin, nasopharynx, kidney, and endometrium. Three of the four patients with multifocal cancer were found to have in situ cancer, and 12.7% of concomitant adenomas had malignant changes. Seven patients had regional lymph node metastases. Of the six patients with rectocolonic multiple tumors who had adequate follow-up data, survival in three ranged from 19.5 to 60 months; three were alive and well 15 to 51 months after resection. Survival of patients with primary rectocolonic and extracolonic tumors was similar. From these data and the pathologic study of the resected specimens, we recommend for any patient with cancer of the rectocolon that the entire colon be searched for multiple primary malignant tumors, that extracolonic tumors be considered second primary tumors unless proved to be metastases, and that follow-up be long and include frequent rectocolonic examinations for a second primary tumor.     

Hepatic resection for noncolorectal,nonneuroendocrine metastases

Resection of certain hepatic metastases of noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine (NCNNE) origin provides actual long-term (>5 years) survival. We conducted a retrospective outcome study at a single tertiary referral institution. Between January 1988 and October 1998, 64 consecutive patients underwent resection of hepatic metastases from NCNNE primary tumors. Overall and disease-free survival rates were correlated to clinicopathologic factors and operative morbidity and mortality. Thirteen patients underwent a right hepatectomy, 6 underwent a left hepatectomy, 3 had extended right and 2 extended left hepatectomy, 2 patients had segmentectomy, 24 underwent wedge resections, and 14 underwent a combination of these forms of resection. R0 resection was achieved in 56 patients (87.5%). The operative mortality was 1.5% (1 of 64). Actual 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 81%, 43%, and 30%, respectively. The factor adversely associated with overall and disease-free survival was uniformly related to the interval between primary tumor resection and the development of hepatic metastases. A 1.5% operative mortality and an actual 5-year survival of 30% justifies hepatic resection, including major hepatic resection, for certain NCNNE metastases. The factor affecting prognosis in this highly select group of patients was the biological behavior of the tumor, with tumors that metastasize earlier having poorer survival rates. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (poster presentation).     

Surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastases involving the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe

BACKGROUND: Hepatic neoplasms in the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe (S1r) are usually difficult to treat surgically because such neoplasms often invade the hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava (IVC). We reevaluated resected cases of colorectal liver metastases involving S1r to confirm the significance of aggressive surgical treatments. METHODS: Between July 1977 and December 2002, 95 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic resection. Seven patients with liver metastases involving the S1r underwent resection. RESULTS: The surgical procedures for liver metastases comprised 3 isolated caudate lobectomies, 2 right hepatectomies, and 2 right hepatic trisectionectomies with caudate lobectomy. Combined resections included partial resection of the hepatic vein in 2 patients, wedge resection of the IVC in 3, and segmental resection of the IVC in 1. Six of the 7 patients with S1r metastasis had recurrent disease in liver and/or lung. A second hepatectomy was carried out in 4 patients and a partial lung resection in 2 patients. Four of the 7 patients survived more than 5 years, but 2 of them died of recurrent disease at 61 and 95 months after initial hepatectomy. The remaining 2 patients are alive 72 and 118 months without any sign of recurrence. The median survival time of the 7 patients was 60 months. CONCLUSION: Liver metastases involving the S1r could be resected radically with en bloc resection of the major hepatic veins and/or the inferior vena cava. An aggressive surgical approach with combined resection of the adjacent major vessels may offer a better chance of long-term survival in selected patients with caudate lobe metastasis from colorectal cancer.     

Experience with resection of primary hepatic malignancy

Our experience with hepatic resection for 106 primary hepatic malignancies has been summarized as a part of a total experience with 411 hepatic resections for various indications. The operative mortality rate (death within a month) was 8.5 per cent in treating primary hepatic malignancy, which is significantly higher than that of treating hepatic metastases (0 of 123 resections). Overall operative mortality of 411 hepatic resection was 3.2 per cent. A high operative risk was noted in patients with gross cirrhosis, trauma, abscess, and large malignant tumors. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients with primary hepatic malignancy were 68.5 per cent, 45.1 per cent, and 31.9 per cent, respectively. Survival rates of patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly higher than those of patients with nonfibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Eighteen patients survived more than 5 years after hepatic resection, 14 of whom had been treated by trisegmentectomy. The most extensive partial hepatectomy, such as right and left trisegmentectomy rather than extended lobectomies, should be used to remove massive tumors with adequate tumor-free margins.     

Kurative und diagnostische Resektionen an der Leber

BACKGROUND: Data from the Brandenburg Tumor Documentation Center (TDCB) in Germany were analyzed for an overview of the current treatment standards of liver surgery in that state. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on prospective data from a total of 37,165 patients diagnosed with malignant tumors between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2004. Of these patients, 3,986 were diagnosed with liver metastases and 554 had primary tumors of the liver or bile duct. Liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma were reported in 1,299. RESULTS: Analysis confirmed that resection of colorectal metastases (51%) and primary liver or bile duct tumors (23.1%) is by far the most frequent indication for liver surgery. Liver metastasis was developed by 29.2% (n=1299) of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Of the patient total, 71.5% showed evidence of liver metastasis already present when colorectal carcinoma was diagnosed. Of 248 patients who had received liver surgery after diagnosis of liver metastases of a colorectal carcinoma, 114 (46%) underwent hepatic segment resection, which was thus performed in only 8.8% (n=114) of patients with liver metastases after colorectal carcinoma (n=1299). CONCLUSIONS: Since only 8.8% of those with liver metastases underwent curative hepatic segment resection, we can conclude that if patients and doctors were provided with adequate information on the curative potential of this surgical method along with regular consultations with surgeons experienced in liver surgery, the result on resection rates would be positive. Data from tumor documentation centers enable selective analysis of the oncological situation of specific diseases.     

The laparoscopic liver resections—an initial experience and the literature review

The laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) represents a new pathway in hepatic surgery. Several studies have reported its application in both malignant and benign liver diseases. The most common liver resections performed laparoscopically are wedge, segmental resections and metastasectomy; although in large centers the laparoscopic right and left hepatectomies have begun to perform more frequently. We report the initial experience in LLRs at our department including a case of the first laparoscopic left lateral liver bisegmentectomy performed in patient with follicular nodular hyperplasia and the 15 cases of wedge laparoscopic resections of echinococcic liver cysts. According to literature the mortality rate in LLRs is up to 0.3% and morbidity rate up to 10.5%. The most common cause of the death is liver failure, while the most frequent complication is the bile leakage. Advantages for patients include smaller incisions, less blood loss, and shorter lengths of hospital stay. The LLRs in experienced hands were shown to be safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality for both minor and major hepatic resections in benign and malignant diseases.     

Sequence of colorectal and liver resection in patients with surgically-treatable stage IV colorectal cancer

Approximately 25-30% of patients with colorectal cancer develop hepatic metastases. For patients diagnosed with resectable colorectal hepatic metastases, variation exists regarding the timing of resection of the colorectal primary and the hepatic metastases including three approaches: (1) the “classical” colorectal-first staged approach, (2) the “combined” or simultaneous/synchronous approach, and (3) the “reverse” or liver-first staged approach. The purpose of this chapter is to review the current literature regarding the timing of colorectal and hepatic resection in patients with surgically treatable colorectal adenocarcinoma hepatic metastases. There are inadequate data at the current time to provide definitive recommendations as to the optimal timing and sequence of surgery. Our recommendations based on existing data favor delivery of neoadjuvant therapy followed by either: (1) the combined approach for low-risk resections, (2) the liver-first staged strategy for high-risk hepatic resections or mid- to distal rectal tumors that may benefit from total neoadjuvant therapy, or (3) the colorectal-first approach for symptomatic primary colon tumors.     

Survival After Resection of Multiple Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

Background: Hepatic resection is potentially curative in selected patients with colorectal metastases. It is a widely held practice that multiple colorectal hepatic metastases are not resected, although outcome after removal of four or more metastases is not well defined.Methods: Patients with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases who submitted to resection were identified from a prospective database. Number of metastases was determined by serial sectioning of the gross specimen at the time of resection. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, complications, and survival were analyzed.Results: From August 1985 to September 1998, 155 patients with four or more metastatic tumors (range 4–20) underwent potentially curative resection by extended hepatectomy (39%), lobectomy (42%), or multiple segmental resections (19%). Operative morbidity and mortality were 26% and 1%, respectively. Actuarial 5-year survival was 23% for the entire group (median 5 32 months) and there were 12 actual 5-year survivors. On multivariate analysis, only number of hepatic tumors (P = .005) and the presence of a positive margin (P = .003) were independent predictors of poor survival.Conclusions: Hepatic resection in patients with four or more colorectal metastases can achieve long-term survival although the results are less favorable as the number of tumors increases. Number of hepatic metastases alone should not be used as a sole contraindication to resection, but it is clear that the majority of patients will not be cured after resection of multiple lesions.Presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 16–19, 2000, New Orleans.