Round window pH manipulation alters the ototoxicity of systemic cisplatin

The effect of manipulation of pH on the ototoxicity of systemic cisplatin was studied in Wistar rats. After control auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were performed, the auditory bullae were opened and acidic (pH 6.0), neutral (pH 7.4) or basic (pH 9.0) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was applied to fill the round window niche (RWN). After 30 min, 13 mg/kg cisplatin solution or saline was administered intraperitoneally. After 3 days, follow-up ABRs were performed and cochleae were processed for morphological analysis. Animals that received basic PBS on the RWN and cisplatin intraperitoneally had significantly smaller ABR threshold shifts compared to rats pretreated with neutral pH buffer (P<0.05). Animals that received acidic PBS on the RWN and systemic cisplatin showed significantly greater ABR threshold shifts compared to those pretreated with neutral pH buffer (P<0.05). No significant threshold changes were observed in animals that received buffer of any pH on the RWN, followed by saline intraperitoneally. Semiquantitative analysis of hair cell survival confirmed a protective effect by basic PBS against cisplatin and a synergistic effect by acidic PBS on cisplatin ototoxicity (P<0.05). It appears that changes in cochlear pH can modulate the ototoxic effects of systemically applied cisplatin.     

Effect of high-dose cisplatin on auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals

OBJECTIVE: The role of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) as early indicators of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in three different rodent species--the guinea pig. the albino rat, and the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus)--was investigated. In addition, an attempt was made to determine which of the three rodent species is most susceptible to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity as measured by auditory brainstem responses (ABR), BACKGROUND: There have been numerous clinical and experimental reports on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, but to the authors' best knowledge, there has been no comparative report on the short-term effects of cisplatin on OAE measured with commercially available equipment between different rodent species. METHODS: Cisplatin was systemically administered as a single high dose (12 mg/kg intraperitoneally) to all three species, and the ototoxic effects were measured before and 3 days after the injection of cisplatin in the same animals, using ABR, TEOAE, and DPOAE. RESULTS: The ABR thresholds were significantly elevated in the guinea pigs and the albino rats but not in the sand rats. Significant depression of TEOAE energy and DPOAE amplitude occurred only in the guinea pigs. The depression of the DPOAE was greater than that of the TEOAE. The guinea pigs showed the greatest degree of ototoxicity (depression of ABR and OAE). CONCLUSIONS: Among the three rodent species, the guinea pig has the potential to be used as a sensitive animal model in studies of cisplatin ototoxicity. The study also showed that the recordings of TEOAE and DPOAE, in addition to ABR, are sensitive techniques for the assessment of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.     

Protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein is not dependent on caspase inhibition.

HYPOTHESIS: Gene therapy with an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector encoding the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) in an animal model of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity can elucidate apoptotic pathways in the inner ear. BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is limited clinically by ototoxicity associated with apoptosis in the inner ear. The relevant intracellular apoptotic pathways, however, are unknown. XIAP is an antiapoptotic protein that both inhibits caspases and reciprocally regulates the proapoptotic Smac/Omi proteins. AAV-mediated delivery of various XIAP mutants could distinguish between these antiapoptotic pathways in the ear and further the development of specific reagents for gene therapy- mediated prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. METHODS: We administered unilaterally through the round-window AAV-harboring genes encoding wild-type dXIAP, yellow fluorescent protein, or either of two dXIAP point mutants-one deficient in caspase inhibition (dXIAP-d) and the other additionally deficient in the binding of Smac/Omi (dXIAP-t). All rats received a 3-day systemic course of cisplatin. Functional hearing loss was measured by shifts in auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds after cisplatin treatment, and hair-cell loss was assessed by whole-mount phalloidin staining of cochlear turns. RESULTS: Uninjected ears universally displayed high-frequency-specific hair-cell loss and ABR threshold shifts upon cisplatin treatment. Although yellow fluorescent protein had no effect, ears injected with dXIAP exhibited 68% less ABR threshold shift at 32 kHz and 50% less basal-turn outer-hair-cell loss compared with contralateral untreated ears. This protection was maintained in ears injected with dXIAP-d but was abolished in those expressing dXIAP-t, which is incapable of blocking Smac/Omi. CONCLUSIO: Hair-cell apoptosis induced by cisplatin involves the Smac/Omi pathway. Thus, gene therapy with either wild-type dXIAP or Smac/Omi-selective dXIAP-d may be effective to protect against cisplatin-mediated ototoxicity.     

Protective effect of thymoquinone against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential protective effect of thymoquinone against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. This study is a prospective, controlled experimental animal study. Experiments were performed on 30 healthy female Sprague-Dawley rats. Thirty animals were divided into three groups of 10 animals each. Group 1 received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cisplatin 15 mg/kg. Group 2 received i.p. thymoquinone 40 mg/kg/day for 2 days prior to cisplatin injection and third day i.p. cisplatin 15 mg/kg was administered concomitantly. Group 2 continued to receive i.p. thymoquinone until fifth day. Group 3 received i.p. thymoquinone 40 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Pretreatment distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem responses (ABR) testing from both ears were obtained from the animals in all groups. After the baseline measurements, drugs were injected intraperitonally. After an observation period of 3 days, DPOAE measurements and ABR testing were obtained again and compared with the pretreatment values. There was no statistically significant difference between pre and post-treatment DPOAE responses and ABR thresholds group 2 and 3. However, group 1 demonstrated significant deterioration of the ABR thresholds and DPOAE responses. Our results suggest that DPOAE responses and ABR thresholds were preserved in the cisplatin plus TQ-treated group when compared with the group receiving cisplatin alone. According to these results, cisplatin-induced ototoxicity may be prevented by thymoquinone use in rats.     

Application of antioxidants and other agents to prevent cisplatin ototoxicity

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To review the recent data from experiments performed in this laboratory to test the hypothesis that cisplatin ototoxicity is related to depletion of glutathione and antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea and that the use of antioxidants or protective agents would protect the cochlea against cisplatin damage and prevent hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Data were reviewed from experiments performed in this laboratory. Control rats were treated intraperitoneally with cisplatin 16 mg/kg. Experimental rats were given cisplatin in combination with one of the following protective agents: diethyldithiocarbamate, 4-methylthiobenzoic acid, ebselen, or lipoic acid. Animals in each group underwent auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold testing before and 3 days after treatment. Cochleae were removed after final ABR testing and analyzed for glutathione and activities of the enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and malondialdehyde. RESULTS: Rats in the control group receiving cisplatin were found to have significant ABR threshold shifts. This was accompanied by a reduction of glutathione and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase) and an elevation of malondialdehyde. Experimental animals had preservation of ABR thresholds and levels of glutathione, antioxidant enzyme activity, and malondialdehyde that were similar to untreated animals. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin ototoxicity appears to be initiated by fee-radical production, which causes depletion of glutathione and antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea, and lipid peroxidation, manifested by an increase in malondialdehyde. These effects were blocked by each of a series of antioxidant compounds given in combination with cisplatin. A mechanism for cisplatin ototoxicity is elaborated with a proposed plan of chemoprevention using agents with different mechanisms of action. These substances could be used alone or in combination to reduce the severity of cisplatin ototoxicity in patients.     

Effect of protective agents against cisplatin ototoxicity

HYPOTHESIS: The goals of this investigation were to compare the efficacy of three protective agents against cisplatin-induced elevation of auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and to examine whether these protective agents prevent cisplatin-induced alterations of the antioxidant defense system in the cochlea of the rat. BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is an ototoxic antitumor agent. Previous animal studies have shown that cisplatin administration causes an elevation of ABR thresholds. These auditory changes are accompanied by alterations in the concentration of glutathione and the antioxidant enzymes in the cochlea. The authors' previous work has indicated that the protective agent diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) prevents decrease in glutathione (GSH), alteration of antioxidant enzyme activity, and disruption of cochlear function with cisplatin administration. METHODS: Wistar rats were sedated and underwent pretreatment ABR testing using clicks and tone burst stimuli at 8, 16, and 32 kHz. Control rats received saline by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. Positive control rats were administered cisplatin 16 mg/kg i.p. Three groups of rats received protective agents in combination with cisplatin. The DDTC-protected rats were given 600 mg/kg of DDTC subcutaneously 1 hour after cisplatin. Animals protected by 4-methylthiobenzoic acid (MTBA) were given 250 mg/kg of this agent i.p. 30 minutes before cisplatin. Animals protected with ebselen were given 16 mg/kg i.p. one hour before cisplatin. The ABR thresholds were recorded 72 hours after cisplatin administration in all groups. Cochleas were removed, and extracts of the tissues were analyzed for GSH, activities of antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase [SOD], catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (as an index of lipid peroxidation). RESULTS: Cisplatin-treated rats had significant ABR threshold shifts, ranging from 27 to 40 dB. Rats administered each of the three protective agents in combination with cisplatin had ABR threshold shifts of <10 dB. The cochleae of rats administered cisplatin alone had nearly a 50% depletion of glutathione and about a 50% reduction in the activities of SOD, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, while catalase activity was reduced to 70% of control values. These changes were accompanied by a reciprocal elevation of MDA of 165%. These changes, namely, the depletion of GSH and antioxidant enzyme activity and the elevation of MDA in the cochlea, were largely attenuated by the administration of the protective agents tested. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that cisplatin ototoxicity is related to lipid peroxidation and that the use of protective agents prevents hearing loss and lipid peroxidation by sparing the antioxidant system in the cochlea. These results suggest the possibility that the clinical use of protective agents could effectively reduce or prevent damage to the inner ear of patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy, provided that the antitumor effect is not altered.     

Amikacin ototoxicity enhanced by Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761)

An animal study was realized to investigate the possible beneficial effect of EGb 761 as an antioxidant agent on amikacin ototoxicity by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Twenty-eight adult rats were grouped equally as follows. GROUP AMIKACIN: rats received amikacin 600 mg/kg/day intramuscularly between postnatal days (PND) 30 and PND44. Group amikacin/EGb 761: rats received amikacin 600 mg/kg/day intramuscularly between PND30 and PND44 and EGb 761 100 mg/kg/day orally between PND30 and PND50. Group EGb 761: rats received equivolume saline intramuscularly between PND30 and PND44 and EGb 761 100 mg/kg/day orally between PND30 and PND50. NO TREATMENT GROUP: rats received nothing. Group amikacin was found to be affected only on the last measurement day of study (PND57). The frequencies greater than 2002 Hz were significantly reduced compared with the amplitudes of PND30 (P<0.05). Group amikacin/EGb 761 was most and earliest affected by amikacin-induced ototoxicity. DPOAE amplitudes were found in this group to be decreased at 2-6 kHz starting on PND50. The results of Group EGb 761 and No treatment group were not significantly changed. For the DPOAE input/output amplitude thresholds, Group amikacin (P<0.05) and Group amikacin/EGb 761 (P<0.01) had significantly elevated thresholds on PND57, except at 5 kHz for Group amikacin (P=0,06). According to the results of the study, EGb 761 may be regarded as a facilitating drug for the development of amikacin ototoxicity. The results of the present study may warn against concomitant use of aminoglycosides, specifically amikacin, with EGb 761.     

AAV-mediated delivery of the caspase inhibitor XIAP protects against cisplatin ototoxicity.

HYPOTHESIS: Delivery of the gene encoding X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) using an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector can protect against cisplatin-mediated ototoxicity. BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent with significant ototoxic side effects. One possible mechanism of toxicity is apoptotic death of many cochlear cell types. Acute treatment with inhibitors of caspases- enzymes critical for apoptosis- has been shown to prevent hearing loss in vivo, but is too short-acting for therapeutic use. Gene therapy provides a specific and chronic means of delivering potential therapeutic gents. Introducing an anti-apoptotic gene into the cochlea could provide long-term prophylaxis against the ototoxic effects of cisplatin. METHOD: Two groups of rats were treated with unilateral injection into the round window of AAV harboring a gene encoding either XIAP or green fluorescent protein (GFP). After at least two months of gene expression, auditory-brainstem-response (ABR) threshold shifts and outer-hair-cell (OHC) number were measured in these two groups of animals after 72-hour treatment with cisplatin. RESULTS: Consistent with previous reports, uninjected and AAV.GFP-injected ears displayed profound ABR threshold elevations and OHC loss after cisplatin treatment. Ears that had been injected with AAV encoding XIAP, however, were significantly protected from these effects: cisplatin-induced ABR-threshold shift and hair-cell loss were attenuated by as much as 78% and 45%, respectively, when compared with contralateral (untreated) ears. CONCLUSION: XIAP delivery to the cochlea can protect against the audiometric changes and hair-cell loss associated with cisplatin ototoxicity. The efficacy, specificity, and duration of the protective effects make this a potentially attractive therapeutic paradigm.     

Systemic dexamethasone for the prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity

Ototoxicity is a common side effect of cisplatin chemotherapy. This study was undertaken to determine the potential protective effects of a systemic administration of dexamethasone against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. A prospective controlled trial conducted in an animal model. The setting was Animal care research facilities of the Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Institute. An experimental guinea pig model was used. The animals were divided as follows: group 1 (n = 10): 12 mg/kg intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin, group 2 (n = 14): 15 mg/kg/day dexamethasone IP for 2 days followed by cisplatin 12 mg/kg IP, group 3 (n = 14): 10 mg/kg/day dexamethasone IP for 2 days, on day 3, they received cisplatin 12 mg/kg IP followed by 20 mg/kg/day dexamethasone for 2 days and group 4 (n = 5): 10 ml of saline IP twice a day for 3 days. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts were measured at four frequencies (8, 16, 20 and 25 kHz) for groups 1, 2 and 3. Histological changes in the organ of Corti, the stria vascularis, the spiral ligament and the spiral ganglion neurons as well as scanning electron microscopy for outer hair cells were completed. Immunohistochemistry for tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) was performed. ABR threshold shifts were similar in all groups. Histological and scanning electron findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has greater protective effect on the stria vascularis. Systemic dexamethasone administration in a guinea pig model did not provide significant protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Dexamethasone may be useful in future applications as a complementary treatment.     

Correlation of increased activities of Na+, K+-ATPase and Ca2+-ATPase with the reversal of cisplatin ototoxicity induced by D-methionine in guinea pigs

Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase in the cochlear lateral wall play an important role in maintaining ionic homeostasis and physiologic function of the cochlea. The present study was designed to test whether the changes of Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase activities of the cochlear lateral wall and the brainstem of guinea pigs after receiving cisplatin for seven consecutive days were correlated with the altered auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Furthermore, whether a chemoprotective agent, D-methionine reversed the increased ABR threshold induced by cisplatin accompanied with the increased ATPase activities was also evaluated. The results obtained showed that cisplatin exposure caused not only a significant increase of threshold but also altered various absolute wave and interwave latencies of ABR. In addition, cisplatin significantly decreased the Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase activities in the cochlear lateral wall with a good dose-response relationship. Regression analysis indicated that an increase of ABR threshold was well correlated with a decrease of both Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase activities in the cochlear lateral wall. A chemoprotectant, D-methionine indeed reversed both abnormalities of ABR and ATPase activities in a well correlation function. The selectivity of these observed changes induced by cisplatin and D-methionine was revealed by the findings that cisplatin-treated guinea pigs had normal III-V interwave latency of ABR and no reduction of Na(+), K(+)-ATPase and Ca(2+)-ATPase specific activities in the brainstem, which is in accordance with the nonpenetrable cisplatin across the blood brain barrier. Taken all together, the present findings suggest that biochemical damage and ionic disturbance may contribute to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity to some extent, which can be reversed by d-methionine.     

Intracochlear administration of thiourea protects against cisplatin-induced outer hair cell loss in the guinea pig

Amelioration of cisplatin-induced side-effects is of great clinical importance. Local administration of a cytoprotective agent to the inner ear offers a possibility to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity without risk of interference with the antitumour effect. The ideal substance for local administration has yet to be identified. Thiourea (TU) has unique properties that make it an interesting candidate. This study was initiated to test the hypothesis that TU given by local administration protects against cisplatin ototoxicity in the guinea pig. After baseline auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment, the left cochlea was implanted with a microtip catheter connected to an osmotic pump filled with either 27 mg/ml TU in artificial perilymph (AP), or AP administered for the full duration of the study. Three days post-implant, animals with normal ABRs received an intravenous injection of 8 mg/kg body-weight cisplatin. Five days after the cisplatin treatment ABRs were reassessed, animals decapitated and bilateral cytocochleograms prepared. TU-treated ears demonstrated significantly lower outer hair cell (OHC) loss as compared to contralateral untreated ears, and significantly lower OHC loss compared to AP-treated ears. ABR threshold shift did not differ significantly between the two groups. It can be postulated that TU demonstrates partial protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.     

Aminoguanidine reduces cisplatin ototoxicity

Cisplatin is known to cause high-frequency neurosensory hearing loss. While reactive oxygen species have been shown to play a role, reactive nitrogen species have been implicated, but not proven to be involved, in cisplatin ototoxicity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of nitric oxide (*NO) in cisplatin ototoxicity by administering aminoguanidine (AG), a relatively specific inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), in conjunction with cisplatin. Rats were injected with cisplatin, AG, or both. Auditory brainstem evoked responses (ABR) were measured before and 3 days after cisplatin administration. The cochlear tissue was then assayed for *NO and malondialdehyde. Cisplatin alone caused significant ABR threshold shifts at all stimuli tested, whereas AG alone caused no shifts. There was a significant reduction in threshold shift for clicks and 16 kHz tone bursts (but not 32 kHz) when AG was given with cisplatin. The malondialdehyde concentration (but not the *NO concentration) in the AG/cisplatin group was significantly lower than that of the cisplatin group. This suggests that AG reduces cisplatin ototoxicity by directly scavenging hydroxyl radicals. The iNOS pathway may play a role in the generation of free radicals and hearing loss resulting from cisplatin administration, but this conclusion was not supported by our data.     

Protective effects of resveratrol on cisplatin-dependent inner-ear damage in rats

Cisplatin is a common chemotherapeutic agent used in many solid and hematologic malignancies. The main unwanted effect of cisplatin is ototoxicity, for which no standard treatment has been reported. The present study examined the protective efficacy of resveratrol on cisplatin-dependent ototoxicity through an experimental model. Fifteen rats were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (control group) (n = 5) received intraperitoneal (i.p.) 15 mg/kg cisplatin; group 2 (resveratrol group) (n = 5) received i.p. 100 mg/kg resveratrol, followed by i.p. 15 mg/kg cisplatin; group 3 (n = 5) served as a vehicle group and received i.p. 1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide. All rats underwent the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test before and 72 h after the treatment. Pretreatment ABR values of the groups were not significantly different. The pretreatment hearing threshold values of the groups were 30 ± 6.60 and 28.5 ± 5.29 dB in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p > 0.05). The post-ABR-I and post-ABR-IV values were, respectively, 1.41 ± 0.18 and 5.83 ± 0.16 ms in the control subjects and 1.19 ± 0.22 and 4.58 ± 0.27 ms in the study group. The ABR-I and ABR-IV durations in rats treated with resveratrol were significantly shorter (p < 0.01). A comparison of threshold values shows that the resveratrol-treated rats had significantly lower values than the control rats. After cisplatin injection, ABR I–IV intervals were compared among the groups. The ABR I–IV interval duration was 4.42 ± 0.16 ms in the control group, while the resveratrol-treated rats showed a significantly shorter ABR I–IV interval duration of 3.49 ± 0.27 ms (p < 0.001). Resveratrol attenuated cisplatin-dependent inner-ear damage, as shown by the ABR-I, ABR-IV, ABR I–IV interval, and hearing threshold values. Our results suggest that this natural antioxidant may be effectively used in reducing the unwanted effects of cisplatin on the ear physiology of patients, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy.     

Inhalation of hydrogen gas attenuates cisplatin-induced ototoxicity via reducing oxidative stress

Objective

Cisplatin, an anticancer drug used extensively to treat a broad range of tumors, has strong ototoxic side effects induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Recently, it has been reported that hydrogen gas (H₂) is a new antioxidant by selectively reducing hydroxyl radical, the most cytotoxic ROS. The present study was designed to investigate whether H₂ treatment is beneficial to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity via reducing oxidative stress.

Methods

The animals were intraperitoneally given a 30 min infusion of 16 mg/kg cisplatin or the same volume of saline. H₂ treatment was given twice with 2% H₂ inhalation for 60 min starting at 1 h and 6 h after cisplatin or saline injection, respectively. The hearing status of all animals was evaluated by auditory brainstem responses (ABR). The hair cell damage was observed by phalloidin staining. In addition, the levels of oxidative products in serum and cochlear tissue were measured.

Results

We found that H₂ treatment significantly attenuated cisplatin-induced hearing loss evaluated by click-evoked and tone burst ABR threshold. Furthermore, histological analysis revealed that 2% H₂ treatment significantly alleviated cisplatin-induced hair cell damage in the organ of corti. In addition, cisplatin significantly increased the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) in serum and cochlear tissue, which was attenuated by H₂ treatment.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that H₂ is beneficial to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity via reducing oxidative stress. Therefore, H₂ has potential for improving the quality of life of patients during chemotherapy by efficiently mitigating the cisplatin ototoxicity.     

Assessment of the protective effects of amifostine against cisplatin-induced toxicity

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine whether the toxicity of cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic alkylating agent, could be reduced by the use of amifostine and to determine whether amifostine alone could cause ototoxicity. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, animal study. METHODS: Auditory brainstem response click threshold, latencies, and blood work were used to measure ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and myelotoxicity before and 4 weeks after treatment. Groups of guinea pigs received either cisplatin alone (30 mg/kg), amifostine (1000 mg/kg), cisplatin plus amifostine (1000 mg/kg), or no agent. RESULTS: Amifostine reduced the hearing loss caused by cisplatin for many animals. Amifostine partially protected against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and renal toxicity. We did not find evidence for myelotoxicity owing to cisplatin in this sample. CONCLUSION: Amifostine may have a role in reducing toxicity or permitting larger doses of cisplatin to be given, but toxicity can still be significant even with protection.     

Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and pharmacokinetics: preliminary findings in a dog model

The early effects of a clinical dose of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) thresholds and the relationship between DPOAE threshold shifts and changes in plasma concentrations of filterable and total platinum (Pt) following infusion of cisplatin in a dog model were investigated. The DPOAE thresholds (based on input-output function) were measured 2 days before a single high dose of cisplatin administration, and compared with measurements recorded 2 and 4 days after infusion. The results revealed DPOAE thresholds to be elevated by 4 days after the administration of cisplatin. However, this elevation could not be correlated with plasma concentrations of filterable and total Pt, which showed little variation over the 48-hour postinfusion period between animals. The present study demonstrated that DPOAE thresholds have the potential to be used as an indicator of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, and cisplatin-induced ototoxicity could not be explained by plasma Pt kinetics in individual animals.     

Antioxidant protection in a new animal model of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity

Mortality is a major complication in animal models of cisplatin-induced hearing loss due to the systemic toxicity of the drug. Here we report on a novel two-cycle treatment in rats, each cycle consisting of four days of cisplatin injections (1 mg/kg, i.p., twice daily) separated by 10 days of rest. This regimen, similar to clinical courses of cancer chemotherapy, produced significant hearing loss without mortality. Auditory brain stem evoked responses were unchanged after the first cycle but were elevated by 40-50 dB at 16 and 20 kHz after the second. Loss of outer hair cells occurred after the second cycle, predominantly in the base of the cochlea. Total cochlear antioxidants declined progressively during drug treatment and were reduced to 60% of control values after the second cisplatin cycle. Co-administration of salicylate (100 mg/kg, s.c., twice daily) during both cycles or during the second cycle restored antioxidant levels and reduced cisplatin-induced threshold shifts. This model of cisplatin ototoxicity without mortality eliminates potentially confounding factors that may determine the survival of a special cohort of animals. The results also support the notion that reactive oxygen species are involved in cisplatin ototoxicity and show the potential usefulness of antioxidant treatment.     

Astragalosides reduce cisplatin ototoxicity in guinea pigs

Cisplatin is known to cause high-frequency neurosensory hearing loss. While reactive oxygen species have been shown to play a role, reactive nitrogen species have been implicated, but not proven to be involved, in cisplatin ototoxicity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of nitric oxide (NO) in cisplatin ototoxicity by administering astragalosides, a natural antioxidant, in conjunction with cisplatin. Guinea pigs were injected with cisplatin, astragalosides or both. Auditory brainstem-evoked responses (ABRs) were measured before and 3 days after cisplatin administration. The cochlear tissue was then assayed for NO and malondialdehyde (MDA), and cochleae were also examined by scanning electron microscopy. Cisplatin alone caused significant ABR threshold shifts at all stimuli tested, whereas astragalosides alone caused no shifts. There was a significant reduction in threshold shift for clicks, 8-kHz and 16-kHz tone bursts (but not 32 kHz) when astragalosides was given with cisplatin. Both the MDA concentration and the NO concentration in the astragalosides/cisplatin group were significantly lower than those of the cisplatin group. Correspondingly, the loss of outer hair cells in the astragalosides/cisplatin group was much less than that in the cisplatin group. This suggests that astragalosides reduces cisplatin ototoxicity by its antioxidant property.     

Protective effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in guinea pigs

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate the protective effects of Salvia miltiorrhiza (SM) against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in guinea pigs.

Methods

Thirty-nine guinea pigs were randomly divided into 3 groups. The first group (control group) received physiologic saline by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection for 5 days. The second group (cisplatin group) was treated with cisplatin (2 mg/kg per day, i.p. injection) for 5 days. The third group (SM group) was given SM (8 g/kg per day, i.p. injection) for 2 days and then was given SM (8 g/kg per day, i.p. injection) and cisplatin (2 mg/kg per day, i.p. injection) for 5 days. Auditory brain stem response (ABR) and cochlea blood flow measurement were used to evaluate cochlea function. The structures of cochlea were observed by light microscope, scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope (TEM), and immunohistochemical examination.

Results

Cisplatin could cause severe acoustic damages including significant elevation of ABR threshold, substantial losses of outer hair cells and inner hair cells, and severe damage on the stria vascularis and spiral ganglion cells (SGCs). Although in SM group, the increased tendency of threshold was milder than that in cisplatin group. The damages in cochlea and stria vascularis were also less severe than those in cisplatin group. The expression of induced nitric oxide synthase in the cochlea and SGC in SM group was lower than that in cisplatin group.

Conclusions

Salvia miltiorrhiza can significantly reduce the cisplatin-induced side effects.     

WR-2721 (Amifostine) Ameliorates Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss But Causes Neurotoxicity In Hamsters: Dose-Dependent Effects

Chemoprotective agents reduce the toxic side effects of chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin. The conventional belief is that the chemoprotective agent WR-2721 (Amifostine), while protecting against most cisplatin-induced side effects, does not protect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (i.e., hearing loss). There is no knowledge, however, about the efficacy of high doses of WR-2721 (WR) in possibly protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Thus, the dose-dependent effects of WR in possibly ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were investigated. Hamsters were given a series of 5 cisplatin injections (3 mg/kg/injection once every other day, i.p.) either alone or in combination with 18, 40, 80, or 400 mg/kg/injection of the rescue agent WR (n = 5 or 10/group). Other groups received either 80 mg/kg/injection WR alone (n = 5) or were untreated (n = 14). Ototoxicity was assessed by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). WR provided dose-dependent rescue from cisplatins ototoxicity with no protection at the low dose of 18 mg/kg, moderate protection at 40 mg/kg, and nearly complete protection at 80 and 400 mg/kg. However, WR doses of 40 mg/kg or higher caused neurotoxicity as evidenced by prolongations in the ABRs interpeak latencies. Thus, high doses of WR provided the beneficial effect of protecting against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, but had the harmful side effect of neurotoxicity. Previous failures to find chemoprotection from cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were likely due to the use of WR doses that were too small. The clinical implications of the beneficial and harmful effects of high doses of WR are discussed.