Durable graft‐versus‐leukaemia effects without donor lymphocyte infusions – results of a phase II study of sequential T‐replete allogeneic transplantation for high‐risk acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplasia

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and high‐risk myelodysplasia but has previously been limited to patients who achieve remission before transplant. New sequential approaches employing T‐cell depleted transplantation directly after chemotherapy show promise but are burdened by viral infection and require donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) to augment donor chimerism and graft‐versus‐leukaemia effects. T‐replete transplantation in sequential approaches could reduce both viral infection and DLI usage. We therefore performed a single‐arm prospective Phase II clinical trial of sequential chemotherapy and T‐replete transplantation using reduced‐intensity conditioning without planned DLI. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Forty‐seven patients with relapsed/refractory AML or high‐risk myelodysplasia were enrolled; 43 proceeded to transplantation. High levels of donor chimerism were achieved spontaneously with no DLI. Overall survival of transplanted patients was 45% and 33% at 1 and 3 years. Only one patient developed cytomegalovirus disease. Cumulative incidences of treatment‐related mortality and relapse were 35% and 20% at 1 year. Patients with relapsed AML and myelodysplasia had the most favourable outcomes. Late‐onset graft‐versus‐host disease protected against relapse. In conclusion, a T‐replete sequential transplantation using reduced‐intensity conditioning is feasible for relapsed/refractory AML and myelodysplasia and can deliver graft‐versus‐leukaemia effects without DLI.     

Thiotepa‐based conditioning versus total body irradiation as myeloablative conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A matched‐pair analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

The optimal conditioning regimen to employ before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still undecided, and while cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (Cy/TBI) is the most commonly used myeloablative regimen, there are concerns regarding long‐term toxicity for patients conditioned with this regimen. Thiotepa‐based conditioning is an emerging radiation‐free regimen with recent publications indicative of comparable clinical outcomes to TBI‐based conditioning. In this analysis of the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT, we performed a retrospective matched‐pair analysis, evaluating the outcome of adult patients with ALL who received thiotepa‐based conditioning (n = 180) with those receiving Cy/TBI conditioning (n = 540). The 2‐year leukemia‐free survival and overall survival (OS) rates of both conditioning regimens were comparable, 33% for thiotepa [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.4‐42.8] versus 39% for Cy/TBI (95% CI: 34.8‐44.5] (P = .33) and 46.5% [95% CI: 38.6‐56.1] versus 48.8% [95% CI: 44.2‐54] (P = .9), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two regimens in the incidence of either acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) or chronic GVHD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased relapse incidence for thiotepa conditioning compared to Cy/TBI (HR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.07‐2.95; P = .03) which did not affect OS. Our results indicate that thiotepa‐based conditioning may not be inferior to Cy/TBI for adult patients with ALL.     

Standard versus alternative myeloablative conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the results of standard versus alternative myeloablative conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 1986 to February 2000, 104 consecutive patients (male: n = 63; median age: 21, range 1.3-44.2 years) with high-risk acute leukemia underwent a non-T-cell depleted graft from an HLA-identical sibling following a standard or alternative myeloablative conditioning regimen. Sixty patients were affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 44 by acute myeloid leukemia (AML); the phase at transplant was >= 2nd complete remission (CR) in 76, untreated 1st relapse with < 20% blasts in 11, refractory leukemia or overt resistant relapse in 17. Pre-transplant regimens consisting of either 12 Gy fractionated total body irradiation (TBI) or 16 mg/kg busulphan (BU) combined with cyclophosphamide (CY) were defined standard (n = 38), whereas all other myeloablative regimens (TBI plus 60 mg/kg etoposide and three-drug combinations) were considered alternative (n = 66). RESULTS: No significant differences in terms of baseline characteristics, incidence and severity of either acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were observed between the two groups, but a significantly higher proportion of patients prepared with an alternative regimen were not evaluable for chronic GVHD (36% vs 16%) (p = 0.026). Sixty-six patients died, 38 of relapse, 26 of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and 2 of other causes. Thirty-eight patients are still alive with a follow-up ranging from 0.7 to 13.8 years (median, 7.1 years); only 1 of 39 patients who relapsed after transplant is alive in CR at 5.7 years from relapse. At the median follow-up, the actuarial probabilities of overall survival, relapse and TRM for patients conditioned with standard and alternative regimens are respectively 52% vs 25% (95% CI, 36-68% vs 13-37%; p = 0.0163), 34% vs 58% (95% CI, 18-51% vs 43-73%; p = 0.0377) and 25% vs 32% (95% CI, 9-40% vs 19-44%; p = ns). After adjustment for diagnosis, age, period, leukemia phase, duration of 1st CR, GVHD prophylaxis and donor-recipient sex combination, the multivariate analysis showed that alternative regimens are associated with a significantly worse survival (hazard ratio 2.31; p = 0.0071) and relapse rate (hazard ratio 2.75; p = 0.0187). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: From this retrospective analysis we can conclude that the alternative myeloablative conditioning regimens we used did not improve the outcome of patients transplanted for high-risk acute leukemia.     

Fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin as salvage therapy in very high-risk AML patients: a bridge to reduced intensity conditioning transplant?

Outcome of patients with primary refractory/relapsed (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal. Herein, we present a retrospective monocentric study of 24 very high-risk AML patients who received a combination of fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) with intermediate-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin as salvage therapy. Median age was 55.3 years. Diagnostic was secondary AML for 33% of them. Seven patients had favorable risk, 8 had intermediate-1 or intermediate-2, and 6 had unfavorable risk of AML according to the European LeukemiaNet prognostic index. Complete remission was achieved in 50% of cases (46% in refractory and 55% in relapsed AML) without excessive toxicity. Thirteen patients could be referred for transplant. Only allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provided a benefit in this patient cohort with a 1-year overall survival of 50.7 versus 18.1% in the absence of transplantation. Patients treated with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) showed a longer survival as compared to those undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen mainly because of decreased toxicity.Our data suggest that salvage therapy with fractionated GO combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin in very high-risk patients may serve as a potential bridge therapy to RIC transplant.     

Reduced intensity compared with high dose conditioning for allotransplantation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a comparative clinical analysis

We evaluated the efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using reduced intensity (RI) vs. myeloablative (MA) conditioning for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Thirty two patients (median age 54) who underwent a RI HSCT (2000-2003) were compared with 187 patients (median age 39) who received a MA transplant (1990-2003). Neutrophil engraftment was more rapid in the RI group (median 11.5 vs. 21 days). Platelet recovery was similar and graft failure was infrequent. The incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and treatment-related mortality was similar though relapse was more frequent after RI conditioning (RR 2.2 [95% CI = 1.1-4.6] P = 0.03). At 2 years, disease-free survival (DFS) (31% vs. 30%, P > 0.1) and overall survival (33% vs. 35%, P > 0.1) were comparable between RI and MA groups, respectively. We suggest that RI allografts can yield satisfactory DFS both for older as well as younger patients with pre-existing comorbidities, who are ineligible for MA allografts. Advances in GVHD management and new approaches for relapsed or refractory disease are necessary to improve these outcomes.     

Positive impact of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease on the outcome of patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a single‐center analysis of 115 patients

To evaluate the impact of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) and prognostic factors for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT), we retrospectively reviewed 115 patients with MDS or acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia (AML‐MLD) after allo‐HCT at our center. Eighty one patients received reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, whereas 34 received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Although the RIC group was significantly older and included more patients with poor cytogenetic risk, no difference in 4‐yr overall survival (OS) was seen between the two groups. In a multivariate analysis, covariates associated with a worse OS were the French‐American‐British stage of refractory anemia excess blasts in transformation/AML‐MLD at peak, poor cytogenetic risk, bone marrow blasts of 20% or higher at HCT and the absence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). By using semi‐landmark analyses, we found that the presence of cGVHD significantly improved OS in high‐risk patients or the RIC group. However, there was no difference in OS between those with and without cGVHD among low‐risk MDS patients. These findings suggest that the graft‐versus‐leukemia effect may be more beneficial in high‐risk patients who do not receive intensive preparative regimens.     

Influence of the intensity of the conditioning regimen on the characteristics of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic transplantation

The graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) characteristics of 150 consecutive patients undergoing reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic (allo-RIC) transplants and 88 patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen were analysed. All patients received the same GVHD prophylaxis and peripheral blood stem cells from a human leucocyte antigen identical sibling. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 67% and 44% in the myeloablative and allo-RIC regimen groups, respectively (P < 0.001), and was 39% vs. 29%, respectively (P = 0.043), for grades 2-4 aGVHD. Only conditioning type (myeloablative versus allo-RIC) significantly influenced the incidence of aGVHD in multivariate analysis: Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-3.07], P < 0.0001. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 63% and 71% among myeloablative and allo-RIC patients respectively (P = 0.084). This trend was because of the higher incidence of limited cGVHD, but not extensive cGVHD among allo-RIC recipients [HR = 3.3 (95% CI: 1.42-8.08), P = 0.0017]. Moreover, among patients who developed cGVHD, the cumulative incidence of limited cGVHD was significantly lower in the myeloablative group than in the allo-RIC group (7% vs. 25%, P = 0.007). Duration of immunosuppression was shorter among allo-RIC patients (35.5% vs. 68.8% required systemic immunosuppression 36 months after transplant, P = 0.028). Although prospective controlled trials are required to further evaluate the effect of the conditioning regimen on GVHD, our results suggest that RIC modifies the incidence and characteristics of both acute and cGVHD after allogeneic transplantation, and decreases the immunosuppression requirements in long-term follow up when compared with myeloablative conditioning.     

ABCG2 overexpression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Impact on stem cell transplantation outcome

ABGG2 protein overexpression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been associated with poor response to conventional chemotherapy and increased relapse risk. No data are available on the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in reversing its negative prognostic role. We have reviewed the outcome of 142 patients with high risk AML who underwent allogeneic SCT in complete remission (n = 94) or with active disease (n = 48). Patients with ABCG2 overexpression at AML diagnosis have lower leukemia free survival (LFS) and increased cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) compared with ABCG2? patients (5‐year LFS 50% vs. 65%, P = 0.01; 5‐year CIR 46% vs. 27%, P = 0.003). Five‐year overall survival was not significantly different between ABCG2+ and ABCG2? patients (39% vs. 51%, P = 0.1). However, if we consider only disease‐related deaths, ABCG2 maintains its negative role (64% vs. 78%, P = 0.018). The negative impact of ABCG2 overexpression was higher in patients undergoing SCT in CR compared with patients receiving transplant with active disease. Conditioning regimen did not abrogate the effect of ABCG2 overexpression, as CIR was higher in ABCG2+ patients receiving both myeloablative (44% vs. 22%, P = 0.018) or reduced intensity conditioning (50% vs. 32%, P = 0.03). In conclusion, ABCG2 overexpression at AML diagnosis identifies a subset of patients with poor outcome also after allogeneic SCT, mainly in terms of higher relapse rates. Prospective studies employing conditioning drugs or post‐transplant strategies able to target ABCG2 are needed to maximize the curative potential of stem cell transplantation.Am. J. Hematol. 90:784–789, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Pre-engraftment graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia

Objectives: Acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) usually occurs with neutrophil engraftment following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but it can also occur before engraftment. We intended to analyze the effects of timing of acute GVHD on leukemia relapse and mortality. Methods: The outcomes of pre‐ and postengraftment GVHD were investigated in 384 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT for acute leukemia. Results: Acute GVHD occurred in 100 patients, pre‐engraftment in 22 and postengraftment in 78. Compared with postengraftment GVHD, pre‐engraftment GVHD was more severe, as assessed by overall grade, with more frequent and more severe skin involvement and higher incidences of non‐infectious fever, diarrhea, hepatic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, and weight gain. Compared with patients without acute GVHD, those with postengraftment GVHD had lower cumulative incidence of relapse [CIR; hazard ratio (HR), 0.470; P = 0.006] and higher cumulative incidence of non‐relapse mortality (CINRM; HR, 2.568; P < 0.001), while those with pre‐engraftment GVHD had similar CIR (HR, 0.815; P = 0.059) and higher CINRM (HR, 2.872; P = 0.036). Overall survival of patients with pre‐engraftment GVHD was lower than that of those without acute GVHD (HR, 1.976; P = 0.017), which was similar to that of those with postengraftment GVHD (HR, 0.969; P = 0.878). Separate analyses of the effects of timing of acute GVHD on post‐transplant outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) showed similar trends. Conclusion: Pre‐engraftment GVHD might be a ‘cytokine storm’ type syndrome rather than ‘real’ GVHD, indicating the need for separate analyses of pre‐ and postengraftment GVHD in future trials.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 is a novel marker differing CD138‐positive and CD138‐negative multiple myeloma cells

Considering the unsatisfactory results of salvage therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R‐AML), their value before allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains questionable. However, direct allogeneic HSCT following established conditioning regimens applied in patients with R/R‐AML during active disease has been equally disappointing. In this retrospective observational study, high‐dose melphalan, as part of a sequential preparative regimen, followed by a total body irradiation (4 × 2 Gy)‐based or a treosulfan‐based dose‐adapted conditioning therapy for allogeneic HSCT was administered to 292 adult patients (median age 56 years, range 17–74) with primary refractory (144 patients), secondary refractory (97 patients) or relapsed AML (51 patients). Overall survival rates at 3 years were 34%, 29% and 41%, respectively. Risk factors associated with an inferior survival were higher age, transplantation from a human leucocyte antigen‐mismatched donor and high disease burden. Patients transplanted with blast infiltration <20% showed a notable survival rate of 51% at 3 years. In particular, patients with primary refractory AML showed a more favourable outcome when transplanted early during their disease course. Thus, high‐dose melphalan‐based sequential conditioning chemotherapy followed by an allogeneic HSCT is feasible and enables long‐term remission to be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with active R/R‐AML.     

Donor compatibility and performance status affect outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

We retrospectively analysed 78 patients with relapsed (n?=?38), primary refractory (n?=?34) or untreated (n?=?6) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who underwent allogeneic HSCT at our Institution between 2002 and 2011, to verify outcome and to identify factors that can affect long-term outcome. Myeloablative conditioning regimens were used in 48 patients (24 siblings, 24 matched unrelated donor (MUD)), while 30 patients (18 siblings, 12 MUD) received reduced-intensity conditioning. Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) developed in 37 (47?%) patients, while chronic GVHD occurred in 19 of the 65 evaluable patients (29?%). With a median follow-up time of 5?years, 13 of 78 patients (17?%) are alive and in complete remission (CR), while 64 have died. Cause of death was disease recurrence in 37 patients (58?%), infection in ten patients (16?%) and GVHD in six (9?%). One-year non-relapse mortality was 35?%. In multivariate analysis, performance status ≥80?% WHO and a full-matched donor were associated with a better outcome: these two variables allowed for risk stratification, identifying three groups with significantly different survival after transplant (P?=?0.0001). Considering post-transplant variables, only CR at recovery and development of cGVHD were correlated with a longer survival. Our data confirm the capacity of allogeneic transplant to prolong survival in a significant proportion of extremely high-risk AML patients.     

The use of ATG abrogates the antileukemic effect of cytomegalovirus reactivation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving grafts from unrelated donors

Several studies provided evidence of a consistent antileukemic effect induced by cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), however the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis, may potentially abrogate the protective effect of CMV infection. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed the risk of relapse in a cohort of 101 patients with AML who received grafts from an unrelated donor after a conditioning regimen including ATG. The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation, evaluated by RT qPCR, was 59% at 12 months, and 93% of CMV reactivations occurred within the first 100 days post HSCT. The 5‐year cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with CMV reactivation was 29% compared with 37% for patients without CMV reactivation, and the only factor associated with a reduced 5‐year cumulative incidence of relapse was the disease status at HSCT (P < 0.001). In the multivariable model adverse cytogenetics (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.02‐5.72; P = 0.044) and acute GVHD (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.32‐8.54; P = 0.011) were independent risk factors for reducing overall survival (OS), while the presence of chronic GVHD was associated with a better OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15‐0.89; P = 0.027). CMV replication was not an independent risk factor for OS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.07‐15.75; P = 0.965). In Conclusion, the results of present study suggest that relapse prevention in patients with AML receiving T‐cell depleted HSCT using ATG do not benefit from CMV reactivation. Am. J. Hematol. 90:E117–E121, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Outcome of conditioning intensity in acute myeloid leukemia with monosomal karyotype in patients over 45 year‐old: A study from the acute leukemia working party (ALWP) of the European group of blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT)

Acute myeloid leukemia with monosomal karyotype (MK AML) carries a very poor prognosis, even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, SCT remains the only curative option in this high‐risk population. Because myeloablative conditioning regimen (MAC) is associated with less relapse, we hypothesized that more intensive conditioning regimen might be beneficial for MK AML patients. We reviewed 303 patients over age 45 diagnosed with either de novo or secondary MK AML. One hundred and five patients received a MAC and 198 a reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC). The median age at SCT was 57‐year‐old, significantly lower in the MAC (53‐year‐old) than in the RIC group (59‐year‐old). The median follow‐up was 42 months (range, 3 ? 156 months). The 3‐year overall survival (OS), leukemia‐free survival (LFS), and relapse rate (RR) were not significantly different between both groups with overall values of 34%, 29%, and 51%, respectively. On the contrary, the 3‐year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was significantly higher in MAC recipients (28%) compared with RIC patients (16%, P = 0.004). The incidence of Grades II to IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) was significantly higher after a MAC (30.5%) than after a RIC (19.3%, P = 0.02). That of chronic GvHD was comparable between both groups (35%) and did not impact on LFS. Interestingly, within our MK AML cohort, hypodiploidy was significantly associated with worse outcomes. Due to reduced toxicity and comparable OS, LFS, and RR, RIC appears as a good transplant option in the very high‐risk population, including older patients, diagnosed with MK AML. Am. J. Hematol. 90:719–724, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparable long‐term outcomes after reduced‐intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult high‐risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in complete remission

The role of reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear because of the small sample size, short follow‐up duration, various regimens for conditioning and graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and the heterogeneity of selection criteria for transplantation. We compared long‐term outcomes of 60 consecutive RIC transplants (fludarabine plus melphalan) with 120 myeloablative conditioning (MAC) transplants (total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide) for adult high‐risk ALL in first or second complete remission. All transplants received a uniform strategy of pretransplant chemotherapy and GVHD prophylaxis. Compared to MAC transplants, RIC transplants had older age (46 years vs. 33 years, P < 0.001) and higher proportions of transplantation using peripheral blood (93.3% vs. 13.3%; P < 0.001) but otherwise showed similar characteristics. After a median follow‐up of 67 months, RIC transplants showed comparable nonrelapse mortality (21.2% vs. 24.3%) and disease‐free survival (50.8% vs. 54.9%) to MAC transplants, although relapse risk was higher (34.2% vs. 26.4%; HR, 2.07; P = 0.019) in multivariate analysis. Other independent factors associated with better outcomes were the presence of chronic GVHD and transplantation in first complete remission. Interestingly, the negative impact of RIC on relapse risk was seen only for Philadelphia‐positive ALL transplants (32.7% vs. 19.6%; HR, 3.46; P = 0.020), while no difference was found between RIC and MAC for Philadelphia‐negative ALL transplants (35.0% vs. 32.1%; HR, 1.39; P = 0.429). RIC can be considered as a reasonable choice for providing a sufficient long‐term graft‐versus‐leukemia effect for adult high‐risk ALL patients ineligible for MAC. Am. J. Hematol. 88:634–641, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Allogeneic bone marrow vs. peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a long-term retrospective single-center analysis in 329 patients

Objectives: Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor‐mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a valuable and increasingly used alternative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This retrospective study aimed at determining whether the stem cell source is predictive for outcome, relapse incidence, non‐relapse mortality, and severity and incidence of both, acute and chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Patients and methods: Between 1983 and 2007, 329 adult patients (median age 40, range 18–76) received a first allogeneic HSCT from either sibling (n = 203) or volunteer unrelated donors (n = 126) at our institution. The source of stem cells was bone marrow in 177 (54%) and peripheral blood in the remaining 152 (46%) patients. Results: Overall survival was 37% (31–43%, 95% confidence interval, CI), the relapse incidence was 30% (25–36%, 95% CI), and the non‐relapse mortality was 43% (38–49%, 95% CI) for the entire cohort with no significant differences between peripheral blood stem cell or BMT. In patients receiving myeloablative conditioning, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) was associated with a significantly lower non‐relapse mortality (32% vs. 46%, P = 0.05), which, however, was restricted to standard‐risk disease (23% vs. 42%, P = 0.02). The overall cumulative incidences of acute GVHD II–IV were 51% and 54% following bone marrow and PBSCT, respectively. Severe acute GVHD III–IV was significantly more frequent after BMT (24% vs. 14%, P = 0.04), whereas chronic GVHD was significantly more frequent following PBSCT (48% vs. 24%, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, PBSCT was only predictive for chronic GVHD (RR 2.29, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Although we failed to demonstrate any advantage of PBSCT over conventional BMT with regard to overall survival, relapse incidence and non‐relapse mortality PBSCT were associated with a significantly higher incidence of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease. Therefore, and by virtue of observations, that some patient groups might benefit from either stem cell source, there is still need for prospective randomized trials with special emphasize on quality of life in long‐term survivors.     

Cyclophosphamide versus etoposide in combination with total body irradiation as conditioning regimen for adult patients with Ph‐negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant: On behalf of the ALWP of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) with myeloablative conditioning based on total body irradiation (TBI) is widely used for the treatment of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). TBI is most frequently administered in combination with either cyclophosphamide (Cy/TBI) or etoposide (Vp/TBI). The goal of this study was to retrospectively compare these two regimens. Adult patients with Ph‐negative ALL treated with alloHCT in first or second complete remission who received Cy/TBI (n = 1346) or Vp/TBI (n = 152) conditioning were included in the analysis. In a univariate analysis, as compared to Cy/TBI, the use of Vp/TBI was associated with reduced incidence of relapse (17% vs. 30% at 5 years, P = .007), increased rate of leukemia‐free survival (60% vs. 50%, P = .04), and improved “graft versus host disease (GVHD) and relapse‐free survival” (GRFS, 43% vs. 33%, P = .04). No significant effect could be observed in terms of the incidence of nonrelapse mortality or acute or chronic GVHD. In a multivariate model, the use of Vp/TBI was associated with reduced risk of relapse (HR = 0.62, P = .04) while the effect on other study end‐points was not significant. In conclusion, conditioning regimen based on Vp combined with TBI appears more effective for disease control than the combination of Cy with TBI for adult patients with Ph‐negative ALL treated with alloHCT.     

Haploidentical transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with minimal/measurable residual disease at transplantation

There have been conflicting results regarding the impact of minimal/measurable disease at transplant on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes after haploidentical transplantation (haplo-SCT). We assessed the impact of pre-transplant disease status on post-transplant outcomes of 143 patients treated with haplo-SCT using fludarabine-melphalan (FM) conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). With a median follow-up of 29 months, the two-year PFS for all patients was 41%. Compared to patients in complete remission (CR) at transplant, those with active disease (n = 29) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (n = 39) had worse PFS. They had hazard ratios (HR) of 3.5 (95% CI: 2.05-6.1; P < .001) and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.3-3.9; P = .002), respectively. Among patients who were in CR at transplant, there were no differences in PFS between those who had minimal residual disease (MRD) positive (n = 24), and MRD negative (n = 41) (HR 1.85, 95%CI: 0.9-4.0; P = .1). In multivariable analysis for patients in CR, only age was predictive for outcomes, while MRD status at transplant did not influence the treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that haplo-SCT with FM conditioning regimen and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis has a protective effect, and may potentially abrogate the inferior outcomes of MRD positivity for patients with AML. Patients with positive MRD may benefit from proceeding urgently to a haplo-SCT, as this does not appear to negatively impact transplant outcomes.     

Early matched sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult AML in first remission using an age-adapted strategy: long-term results of a prospective GOELAMS study

The LAM2001 phase 3 trial, involving 832 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; median: 46 years) proposed HLA-identical sibling allograft HSCT for all patients with an identified donor. The trial compared reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for patients older than 50 years of age (N = 47) and myeloablative conditioning for younger patients (N = 117). BM HSCT was performed in the younger patients, while the older ones received a consolidation course, followed by peripheral blood allo-HSCT using RIC. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, was 51.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.1-61.8) and 11.3% (1.6-21.2) after myeloablative or RIC, respectively (P < .0001) and that of chronic GVHD 45.8% (95% CI: 34.8-56.7) and 41.7% (24.7-58.6; NS). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 108 months was 15.8% (95% CI: 9.8-23.2) for myeloablative, and 6.5% (0.2-16.2) for RIC (NS). CI of relapse at 108 months was 21.7% (95% CI: 13.9-28.6) and 28.6% (16.5-43.4; NS). Overall survival at 108 months was 63.4% (95% CI: 54.6-72.2) and 65.8% (52.2-72.2), respectively, after myeloablative or RIC (NS). RIC peripheral blood stem cell allo-HSCT is prospectively feasible for patients between the ages of 51 and 60 years without excess of relapse or nonrelapse mortality, and compares favorably with myeloablative marrow allo-HSCT proposed to younger patients.     

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive histology non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Forty-four patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive histology non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (diffuse large B cell, n = 23; peripheral T cell, n = 5; transformed B cell, n = 16) proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) between 1987 and 2003. Median age at transplant was 40 years (range 19-56 years). At the time of transplant, 35 were chemosensitive and nine were chemorefractory. Thirty-three patients had matched sibling donors and 11 had unrelated donors. Forty-two patients (95%) received radiation-based conditioning regimens. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI): 27-58%] and 48% (95% CI: 32-63%) respectively. Treatment-related mortality was 25% at 1 year. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was the only significant variable affecting OS and EFS, and had a negative impact. Chronic GVHD did not influence survival. Lymphoma relapse <12 months after initial therapy predicted for increased risk of relapse post-transplant (P = 0.02). Patients with chemorefractory lymphoma were not at increased risk of relapse (P = 0.20) with four of nine patients remaining alive without disease 12-103 months post-transplant. In conclusion, allo-SCT for relapsed or refractory aggressive histology NHL results in long-term EFS and OS of 40-50%. Patients with chemorefractory disease can have a durable remission post-transplant.     

Salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia with fludarabine,cytarabine, and idarubicin with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin and with concurrent or sequential G‐CSF

The current salvage therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unsatisfactory. Over the past 7 years, we have used two salvage regimens: fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin with (FLAG‐IM) or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (9 mg/m² on Day 8) (FLAG‐I) in relapsed/refractory AML. Three‐quarters of patients also received concurrent G‐CSF. Seventy‐one patients were treated, 23 with FLAG‐I and 48 with FLAG‐IM. The median duration of follow‐up was 30.6 months. The treatment groups were well balanced with median ages of 48 years (range 18–70) and 47 years (range 20–68), unfavorable cytogenetics in 57% and 35%, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in 43% and 42%, and CR1 duration <1 year in 60% and 67%, respectively, for FLAG‐I and FLAG‐IM. The complete remission (CR) rate in the FLAG‐I group was 39% with an additional 13% achieving a CRp [overall response rate (ORR) 52%]; the CR rate in the FLAG‐IM group was 29% with an additional 27% achieving a CRp (ORR 56%). The median duration of response (DOR; 16.8 vs. 8.3 months), event‐free survival (EFS; 7.4 vs. 4.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 8.8 vs. 5.0 months) trended to favor FLAG‐I over FLAG‐IM. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrent with chemotherapy had superior overall response rate (ORR; 62% vs. 29%, P = 0.026), median EFS (6.2 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.010), and OS (8.8 vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.004) when compared with those who sequentially received G‐CSF and chemotherapy, regardless of chemotherapy regimen. The addition of GO, at this dose and schedule, to FLAG‐I failed to improve the outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrently with chemotherapy had improved outcomes. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.