Treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a serious complication of sepsis that is associated with a high mortality. OBJECTIVES: Using the adapted International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) diagnostic scoring algorithm for DIC, we evaluated the treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin (AT) in patients with severe sepsis with or without DIC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the phase III clinical trial in severe sepsis (KyberSept), 563 patients were identified (placebo, 277; AT, 286) who did not receive concomitant heparin and had sufficient data for DIC determination. RESULTS: At baseline, 40.7% of patients (229 of 563) had DIC. DIC in the placebo-treated patients was associated with an excess risk of mortality (28-day mortality: 40.0% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.01). AT-treated patients with DIC had an absolute reduction in 28-day mortality of 14.6% compared with placebo (P = 0.02) whereas in patients without DIC no effect on 28-day mortality was seen (0.1% reduction in mortality; P = 1.0). Bleeding complications in AT-treated patients with and without DIC were higher compared with placebo (major bleeding rates: 7.0% vs. 5.2% for patients with DIC, P = 0.6; 9.8% vs. 3.1% for patients without DIC, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose AT without concomitant heparin in septic patients with DIC may result in a significant mortality reduction. The adapted ISTH DIC score may identify patients with severe sepsis who potentially benefit from high-dose AT treatment.     

不同DIC诊断评分标准对严重脓毒症患者病情评价的比较

目的:探讨不同DIC评分标准判断严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克的患者DIC和MODS发生和预后的价值。方法:收集246例严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者入院第1、3、7天的各项生理参数和实验室指标,分别使用ISTH显性DIC评分标准、非显性DIC评分标准和JAAMDIC评分标准进行诊断评分,同时进行SOFA评分,观察不同DIC评分标准之间确诊率、诊断时间点的差异;比较DIC确诊组间的病死率、SOFA分值的差异,绘制三种DIC评分标准的ROC曲线,计算曲线下面积,衡量各个评分系统对危重患者的病情严重程度和预后的判断准确性。结果:三种评分标准均能在一定程度上准确反映危重病患者多脏器功能衰竭的发生和预后,使用ISTH显性标准确诊的患者病死率和SOFA分值最高,诊断时间点同时或晚于ISTH非显性标准和JAAM标准;在DIC确诊组间的病死率和SOFA分值的比较上,JAAM标准与ISTH显性标准之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),ISTH非显性标准与ISTH显性标准之间差异有统计学意义,JAAM标准和ISTH非显性标准之间,病死率差异无统计学意义、SOFA分值差异有统计学意义;3个评分标准的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.739、0.724和0.778,相互之间比较差异均有统计学意义。结论:ISTH显性标准诊断DIC特异性最高,敏感性差;ISTH非显性标准诊断DIC敏感性最高,特异性差;JAAM标准诊断DIC敏感性和特异性均较高,对危重病患者的MODS发生和预后判断更为准确,可作为早期干预治疗的首选诊断标准。     

A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria

OBJECTIVES: To validate scoring algorithm criteria established by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and to evaluate its diagnostic property by comparing the two leading scoring systems for DIC, from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study during a 3-month period. SETTING: General critical care center in a tertiary care hospital. Patients: Two hundred seventy-three patients with platelet counts<150x109/L were enrolled. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The JAAM, JMHW, and ISTH DIC scoring algorithms were prospectively applied within 12 hrs of patients meeting the inclusion criteria (day 0) to days 1-3, by global coagulation tests. The numbers of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were determined simultaneously. Mortality associated with any cause was also assessed 28 days after the enrollment. All global coagulation tests and SIRS criteria adopted in the JAAM criteria and their cutoff points were validated with use of SOFA scores and mortality rate. DIC diagnostic rate of the JAAM DIC scoring system was significantly higher than that of the other two criteria (p<.001). The JAAM DIC algorithm was the most sensitive for early diagnosis of DIC (p<.001). Patients who fulfilled the JAAM DIC criteria included almost all those whose DIC was diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH scoring systems. The JAAM DIC scores showed significant correlation with SOFA scores ([rho]=0.499; p<.001). SOFA score and mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increase in the JAAM DIC score. Fibrinogen criteria had little effect in predicting outcome for the DIC patients, and a total score of 4 points in the JAAM scoring system without fibrinogen was closely related to poor prognosis. According to the results, we revised the JAAM criteria by excluding fibrinogen and confirmed that the DIC diagnostic properties of original criteria remained unchanged in the revised JAAM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The JAAM scoring system has an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC. The scoring system identified most of the patients diagnosed by the JMHW and ISTH criteria. Revised JAAM DIC criteria preserved all properties of the original criteria for DIC diagnosis. The revised scoring system can be useful for selecting DIC patients for early treatment in a critical care setting.     

International integrated database for the evaluation of severe sepsis and drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy: 28-day survival and safety

PURPOSE: To enhance the understanding of severe sepsis, a database of patients from multiple clinical trials spanning a 6-year period was constructed. Initial analyses evaluated the 28-day survival in the placebo group and further assessed the treatment effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA). METHODS: Five severe sepsis studies with similar entry criteria were combined, and baseline characteristics and 28-day mortality were evaluated (4459 severe sepsis patients; placebo, n = 1231; DrotAA, n = 3228). An integrated data analysis with propensity score adjustment was performed. Twenty-one variables selected by stepwise logistic regression were included in a propensity score of differences between the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: Over the 6-year period of these trials, there was no change in placebo mortality rates overall (P = .67), nor in subgroups of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score >/=25 (P = .73) or multiple organ dysfunction (P = .38). The adjusted relative hazard risk for DrotAA patients was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.95; P = .007). Serious bleeding (0.8% in placebo vs 3.5% in DrotAA, P < .0001) was increased during the DrotAA infusion period. CONCLUSIONS: Initial analyses indicate that placebo mortality remained unchanged over a recent 6-year period. These analyses also further substantiate that treatment with DrotAA is associated with improved survival.     

Modified score for disseminated intravascular coagulation in the critically ill

Objective To assess the value of the diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and that of the parameters included in the ISTH score for overt DIC in predicting day 28 mortality in intensive care patients. Also, to assess the value of the components of the score in the diagnosis of overt DIC.Design and setting Retrospective clinical study in a university hospital intensive care unit.Patients and participants 494 consecutive patients admitted in the ICU between January 2002 and October 2003.Measurements and results Clinical and laboratory data, including hemostatic parameters, were collected from computerized databases and patient files. Altogether 19% (95/494) of the patients fulfilled the criteria for overt DIC. Their day 28 mortality rate was higher than that of patients without overt DIC (40% vs. 16%). The lowest platelet count (area under curve, AUC, 0.910), highest plasma D-dimer (AUC 0.846), lowest antithrombin (AUC 0.823), and Owren-type prothrombin time activity (AUC 0.797) discriminated well the patients with and without overt DIC, whereas plasma fibrinogen (AUC 0.690) had poor discriminative power. No patient with the diagnosis of overt DIC had decreased plasma fibrinogen. Day-1 SOFA and APACHE II score, the first CRP measurement, and the lowest antithrombin were independent predictors of day 28 mortality.Conclusions The diagnosis of overt DIC was not an independent predictor of day 28 mortality. In ICU patients plasma antithrombin seems a promising candidate in the panel of indicators for overt DIC whereas the value of plasma fibrinogen is in doubt.     

弥散性血管内凝血诊断评分标准在产科的应用评价

目的 采用已有的4种国际非孕弥散性血管内凝血（DIC）诊断评分标准对产科DIC的诊断进行评估，探索更适合产科DIC诊断的“金标准”。 方法 选择2009年6月－2012年6月期间产科拟诊DIC的孕产妇为研究对象，用日本卫生福利部（JMHW）提出的JMHW、日本危重病协会（JAAM）提出的JAAM、国际血栓与止血委员会（ISTH）提出的ISTH显性和ISTH非显性4种诊断评分标准联合诊断和构建“金标准”，以此评价4种诊断标准对产科DIC诊断的特性。 结果 受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析显示ISTH非显性标准、ISTH显性标准、JMHW、JAAM的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.939、0.865、0.867、0.867，ISTH非显性标准灵敏度和特异度与“金标准”在不同诊断界值时较一致，同时优于其他3种诊断标准。 结论 ISTH非显性标准较适合作为临床产科DIC诊断，其对产科这一特殊发病人群的DIC诊断具有更科学的临床诊断价值。     

Safety of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis: Data from adult clinical trials and observational studies

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), or recombinant human activated protein C, represents the only Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for mortality reduction in adult patients with severe sepsis. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) has properties that address microvascular injury in severe sepsis through its direct effects on endothelial cells and leukocytes while also having antithrombotic and indirect profibrinolytic properties. Sepsis bundle and guideline implementation has been associated with improved survival and includes DrotAA administration in appropriate patients. Several DrotAA postapproval clinical studies have yielded additional outcome and safety data, better defining its benefit/risk profile. Bleeding is more common in DrotAA-treated patients; therefore, a careful assessment of bleeding risk and an understanding of the safety profile is required. This summary provides a detailed review of safety data and outcomes of patients treated with DrotAA in recent clinical studies enrolling more than 7000 adult patients.     

Protein C: a potential biomarker in severe sepsis and a possible tool for monitoring treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated)

Introduction

Drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) treatment, a 96-hour infusion, reduces 28-day mortality in severe sepsis to approximately 25%. The question remains whether a longer infusion or higher dose could increase rate of survival. The goal of this study was to identify a dependable, sensitive measure with which to monitor disease progression and response in patients during DrotAA treatment.

Methods

Data on severe sepsis patients included in PROWESS (placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of 850 DrotAA and 840 placebo individuals) and ENHANCE (single-arm, open-label study of 2,375 DrotAA patients) studies were analyzed. In these studies, DrotAA (24 μg/kg per hour) or placebo was infused for 96 hours and patients were followed for 28 days. Data on six laboratory measures and five organ dysfunctions were systematically analyzed to identify a potential surrogate end-point for monitoring DrotAA therapy and predicting 28-day mortality at the end of therapy. To allow comparison across variables, sensitivity and specificity analyses identified cut-off values for preferred outcome, and relative risks for being above or below cut-offs were calculated, as was the 'proportion of treatment effect explained' (PTEE) to identify biomarkers that contribute to benefit from DrotAA.

Results

Protein C was the only variable that correlated with outcome across all analyses. Using placebo data, a baseline protein C under 40% was established as a useful predictor of outcome (odds ratio 2.12). Similar odds ratios were associated with cut-off values of other biomarkers, but the treatment benefit associated with DrotAA was significantly greater below the cut-off than above the cut-off only for protein C (relative risk for 28-day mortality 0.66 versus 0.88; P = 0.04). Protein C was the only end-of-infusion biomarker that potentially explained at least 50% of the benefit from DrotAA (PTEE 57.2%). The PTEE was 41% for cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and for d-dimer. At the end of infusion (day 4), protein C categories (≤40%, 41% to 80%, and > 80%) remained significantly related to mortality, regardless of treatment assignment.

Conclusion

Based on systematic analyses of 11 variables measured in severe sepsis clinical trials, protein C was the only variable consistently correlated with both DrotAA treatment effect and survival. Further study is needed to determine whether longer infusions or higher doses of DrotAA would achieve the goal of normalizing protein C in more patients with severe sepsis.     

A multicenter,prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis

Introduction

To validate the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scoring system in patients with severe sepsis, we conducted a multicenter, prospective study at 15 critical care centers in tertiary care hospitals.

Methods

This study included 624 severe sepsis patients. JAAM DIC was scored on the day of diagnosis of severe sepsis (day 1) and day 4. Scores for disease severity and organ dysfunction were also evaluated.

Results

The prevalence of JAAM DIC was 46.8% (292/624), and 21% of the DIC patients were scored according to the reduction rate of platelets. The JAAM DIC patients were more seriously ill and exhibited more severe systemic inflammation, a higher prevalence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and worse outcomes than the non-DIC patients. Disease severity, systemic inflammation, MODS and the mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increased JAAM DIC score on day 1. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated lower 1-year survival in the JAAM DIC patients than in those without DIC (log-rank test P <0.001). The JAAM DIC score on day 1 (odds ratio = 1.282, P <0.001) and the Delta JAAM DIC score (odds ratio = 0.770, P <0.001) were independent predictors of 28-day death. Dynamic changes in the JAAM DIC score from days 1 to 4 also affected prognoses. The JAAM DIC scoring system included all patients who met the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt DIC criteria on day 1. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system missed a large number of nonsurvivors recognized by the JAAM scoring system.

Conclusions

The JAAM DIC scoring system exhibits good prognostic value in predicting MODS and poor prognosis in patients with severe sepsis and can detect more patients requiring treatment. Conducting repeated daily JAAM scoring increases the ability to predict the patient''s prognosis.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated): does current evidence support treatment for any patients with severe sepsis?

Two international multicentre randomised controlled trials of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation of Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) and Administration of Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Early Stage Severe Sepsis (ADDRESS) trials, have produced inconsistent results. When 28-day mortality data from these trials for patients with severe sepsis and at high risk of death are pooled using a standard random-effects meta-analysis technique, there is no statistically significant survival benefit (for patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores of 25 or more), or a borderline significant benefit (for patients with multi-organ failure). We argue that two important methodological issues might explain the disparate results between the two trials. These issues centre on early trial stopping, which exaggerates treatment effects, and reliance on subgroup analyses, which for DrotAA yields inconsistent results across different definitions of high risk. These concerns call into question the effectiveness of DrotAA in any patients with severe sepsis. Consequently, further randomised trials of this agent in prospectively defined high-risk patients are required to clarify its role in the management of severe sepsis.     

Combination of thrombin-antithrombin complex,plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and protein C activity for early identification of severe coagulopathy in initial phase of sepsis: a prospective observational study

Introduction

Current criteria for early diagnosis of coagulopathy in sepsis are limited. We postulated that coagulopathy is already complicated with sepsis in the initial phase, and severe coagulopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) becomes overt after progressive consumption of platelet and coagulation factors. To determine early diagnostic markers for severe coagulopathy, we evaluated plasma biomarkers for association with subsequent development of overt DIC in patients with sepsis.

Methods

A single-center, prospective observational study was conducted in an adult ICU at a university hospital. Plasma samples were obtained from patients with sepsis at ICU admission. Fourteen biomarkers including global markers (platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and fibrin degradation product (FDP)); markers of thrombin generation (thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and soluble fibrin); markers of anticoagulants (protein C (PC) and antithrombin); markers of fibrinolysis (plasminogen, α₂-plasmin inhibitor (PI), plasmin-α₂-PI complex, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1); and a marker of endothelial activation (soluble E-selectin) were assayed. Patients who had overt DIC at baseline were excluded, and the remaining patients were followed for development of overt DIC in 5 days, and for mortality in 28 days.

Results

A total of 77 patients were enrolled, and 37 developed overt DIC within the following 5 days. Most patients demonstrated hemostatic abnormalities at baseline with 98.7% TAT, 97.4% FDP and 88.3% PC. Most hemostatic biomarkers at baseline were significantly associated with subsequent development of overt DIC. Notably, TAT, PAI-1 and PC discriminated well between patients with and without developing overt DIC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.86); 0.87 (0.78 to 0.92); 0.85 (0.76 to 0.91), respectively), and using the three together, significantly improved the AUROC up to 0.95 (vs. TAT, PAI-1, and PC). Among the significant diagnostic markers for overt DIC, TAT and PAI-1 were also good predictors of 28-day mortality (AUROC, 0.77 and 0.81, respectively).

Conclusions

Severe coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities on ICU admission were associated with subsequent development of overt DIC. A single measurement of TAT, PAI-1, and PC activity could identify patients with ongoing severe coagulopathy, early in the course of sepsis.     

Severe community-acquired pneumonia as a cause of severe sepsis: data from the PROWESS study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as a cause of severe sepsis in the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial and to evaluate the effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) in this subgroup. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the severe CAP subgroup in the PROWESS trial. SETTING: Tertiary care institutions in 11 countries. INTERVENTIONS: DrotAA (n = 850), 24 microg.kg.hr for 96 hrs, or placebo (n = 840). PARTICIPANTS: The 1,690 patients with severe sepsis enrolled in the PROWESS trial. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were classified as having CAP if lung was the primary site of infection and if they were enrolled directly from home (private residence) with /=25, Pneumonia Severity Index score of >/=4, or CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age) score of >/=3. CONCLUSIONS: CAP associated with a high Pneumonia Severity Index score, bacteremia, or an intense coagulation and inflammatory response requiring intensive care unit care were indicators of a high risk of death from severe sepsis. In patients with severe sepsis resulting from CAP, a readily identifiable disease, DrotAA, improved survival compared with placebo.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis presenting with purpura fulminans, meningitis, or meningococcal disease: a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in recent clinical studies

Introduction

We report data from adult and pediatric patients with severe sepsis from studies evaluating drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) and presenting with purpura fulminans (PF), meningitis (MEN), or meningococcal disease (MD) (PF/MEN/MD). Such conditions may be associated with an increased bleeding risk but occur in a relatively small proportion of patients presenting with severe sepsis; pooling data across clinical trials provides an opportunity for improving the characterization of outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of placebo-controlled, open-label, and compassionate-use trials was conducted. Adult patients received infusions of either DrotAA or placebo. All pediatric patients (<18 years old) received DrotAA. 189 adult and 121 pediatric patients presented with PF/MEN/MD.

Results

Fewer adult patients with PF/MEN/MD met cardiovascular (68.3% versus 78.8%) or respiratory (57.8% versus 80.5%) organ dysfunction entry criteria than those without. DrotAA-treated adult patients with PF/MEN/MD (n = 163) had an observed 28-day mortality rate of 19.0%, a 28-day serious bleeding event (SBE) rate of 6.1%, and an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate of 4.3%. Six of the seven ICHs occurred in patients with MEN (three of whom were more than 65 years old with a history of hypertension). DrotAA-treated adult patients without PF/MEN/MD (n = 3,088) had an observed 28-day mortality rate of 25.5%, a 28-day SBE rate of 5.8%, and an ICH rate of 1.0%. In contrast, a greater number of pediatric patients with PF/MEN/MD met the cardiovascular organ dysfunction entry criterion (93.5% versus 82.5%) than those without. DrotAA-treated PF/MEN/MD pediatric patients (n = 119) had a 14-day mortality rate of 10.1%, an SBE rate of 5.9%, and an ICH rate of 2.5%. DrotAA-treated pediatric patients without PF/MEN/MD (n = 142) had a 14-day mortality rate of 14.1%, an SBE rate of 9.2%, and an ICH rate of 3.5%.

Conclusion

DrotAA-treated adult patients with severe sepsis presenting with PF/MEN/MD had a similar SBE rate, a lower observed 28-day mortality rate, and a higher observed rate of ICH than DrotAA-treated patients without PF/MEN/MD. DrotAA-treated pediatric patients with severe sepsis with PF/MEN/MD may differ from adults, because all three outcome rates (SBE, mortality, and ICH) were lower in pediatric patients with PF/MEN/MD.     

Obesity does not alter the pharmacokinetics of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis

BACKGROUND: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) [DrotAA] is approved for the reduction of mortality in adults with severe sepsis (sepsis with acute organ dysfunction) and high risk of death. Patients whose actual body weight was >135 kg were excluded from the Phase III PROWESS trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare exposure to DrotAA in patients with severe sepsis weighing >135 kg with those weighing < or =135 kg in an open-label, Phase IV trial, and quantify the elimination half-life (t1/2) of DrotAA in these patients. METHODS: PROWESS inclusion/exclusion criteria were used, except that patients >135 kg were enrolled. Blood samples were collected for steady-state plasma concentration (Css) analysis of activated protein C once each day and for t1/2 analysis after infusion. Weight-normalized clearance (Clp) and t1/2 estimates for DrotAA were calculated and compared between weight groups. RESULTS: Patient weight range was 59-227 kg. There were 32 patients < or =135 kg and 20 patients >135 kg enrolled. Median Clp was 0.45 L/h/kg (interquartile range [IQR] 0.37-0.54) for patients < or =135 kg and 0.42 L/h/kg (IQR 0.33-0.54) for patients >135 kg (p = 0.692). Median estimates of Css were 51.9 ng/mL (IQR 43.4-62.0) and 56.5 ng/mL (IQR 44.9-71.1; p = 0.570). In patients < or =135 kg, DrotAA had a median t1/2 of 16.7 minutes (IQR 13.9-20.0) compared with 16.0 minutes (IQR 12.9-19.8) in patients >135 kg (p = 0.767), for a composite median t1/2 of 16.3 minutes (IQR 14.2-18.8). CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference in Css concentrations or t1/2 of DrotAA between patients weighing < or =135 kg and >135 kg. DrotAA should be dosed by actual body weight.     

Troponin-I as a prognosticator of mortality in severe sepsis patients

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) as a 28-day mortality prognosticator and predictor for a drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) survival benefit in recombinant human activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis patients.

Methods

Cardiac troponin-I was measured using the Access AccuTnI Troponin I assay (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). There were 598 patients (305 DrotAA, 293 placebo) with baseline cTnI data (cTnI negative [<0.06 ng/mL], n = 147; cTnI positive [≥0.06 ng/mL], n = 451).

Results

Cardiac troponin-I–positive patients were older (mean age, 61 vs 56 years; P = .002), were sicker (mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, 26.1 vs 22.3; P < .001), had lower baseline protein C levels (mean level, 49% vs 56%; P = .017), and had higher 28-day mortality (32% vs 14%, P < .0001) than cTnI-negative patients. Elevated cTnI was an independent prognosticator of mortality (odds ratio, 2.020; 95% confidence interval, 1.153-3.541) after adjusting for other significant variables. Breslow-Day interaction test between cTnI levels and treatment was not significant (P = .65).

Conclusion

This is the largest severe sepsis study reporting an association between elevated cTnI and higher mortality. Cardiac troponin-I elevation was not predictive of a survival benefit with DrotAA treatment.     

Hospital mortality and resource use in subgroups of the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in hospital mortality and resource use in adult severe sepsis subjects randomized to receive drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) or placebo in the PROWESS trial. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, blinded follow-up of subjects enrolled in a previous randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: One hundred sixty-four tertiary care institutions in 11 countries. PARTICIPANTS: The 1,690 subjects with severe sepsis enrolled and treated with study drug in PROWESS, of whom 1,220 were alive at 28 days (the end of the original PROWESS follow-up). INTERVENTIONS: DrotAA (n = 850), 24 microg/kg/hr for 96 hrs, or placebo (n = 840). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: New follow-up data through hospital discharge were merged with existing 28-day follow-up data. Hospital mortality was calculated for designated subgroups. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) scores were calculated overall and in designated subgroups. Hospital discharge location was recorded. The 95% confidence interval of most subgroups contained the relative risk estimate for overall 28-day and hospital mortality. Median hospital length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay were similar in both treatment groups: 16 vs. 17 days (p = .22) and 9 vs. 9 days (p = .7) for placebo vs. DrotAA. No significant difference in TISS-28 scores was observed between treatment groups overall or in subgroups of disease severity. In subjects for whom discharge destination was reported, 42.8% of placebo subjects and 46.8% of DrotAA subjects (two thirds of survivors in each group) were discharged directly to home. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in hospital mortality with DrotAA in most of the subgroups of PROWESS is consistent with the reduction in 28-day and hospital mortality observed in the overall PROWESS population. Additional survivors created with DrotAA treatment did not increase per-patient resource use or intensive care unit or hospital length of stay.     

The effect of drotrecogin alfa (activated) on long-term survival after severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term survival for subjects with severe sepsis enrolled in the previous multiple-center trial (PROWESS) of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) vs. placebo. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, blinded follow-up of subjects enrolled in a previous randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: One hundred sixty-four tertiary care institutions in 11 countries. PARTICIPANTS: The 1,690 subjects with severe sepsis enrolled and treated with study drug in PROWESS, of whom 1,220 were alive at 28 days (the end of the original PROWESS follow-up). INTERVENTIONS: DrotAA (n = 850), 24 mug/kg/hr for 96 hrs, or placebo (n = 840). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Long-term survival data were collected. We had follow-up information on 100% of subjects at 28 days, 98% at hospital discharge, 94% at 3 months, and 93% at 1 yr. The longest follow-up was 3.6 yrs. Hospital survival was higher with DrotAA vs. placebo (70.3% vs. 65.1%, p = .03). There was no statistically significant difference in duration of survival time or in landmark survival rates in subjects who received DrotAA compared with those who received placebo (median duration of survival = 1113 days vs. 846 days for DrotAA vs. placebo, p = .10; landmark survival rates for DrotAA vs. placebo, 66.1% vs. 62.4% at 3 months [p = .11], 62.2% vs. 60.3% at 6 months [p = .44], 58.9% vs. 57.2% at 1 yr [p = .49], and 52.6% vs. 49.3% at 2(1/2) yrs [p = .21]). There was a significant interaction (p = .0008) between treatment assignment and baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, suggesting qualitative differences in treatment effect with severity of illness. Subjects with APACHE II >/=25 had better survival time with DrotAA (median duration of survival: 450 vs. 71 days, p =.0005). Survival rates were also higher at landmark time points (DrotAA vs. placebo, 58.9% vs. 48.4% at 3 months [p = .003], 55.2% vs. 45.3% at 6 months [p = .005], 52.1% vs. 41.3% at 1 yr [p = .002], and 45.6% vs. 33.8% at 2(1/2) yrs [p = .001]). In the APACHE II <25 group there was no significant difference in survival time or survival rates at landmark time points except at 1 yr (DrotAA vs. placebo, 65.5% vs. 72.0% at 1 yr, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The acute survival benefit observed in subjects with severe sepsis who received DrotAA persists to hospital discharge. The survival benefit loses statistical significance thereafter. Post hoc analysis suggests the effect of DrotAA varies by APACHE II score with improved long-term survival in subjects with APACHE II scores >/=25 but no benefit in those with lower scores.     

Use of an integrated clinical trial database to evaluate the effect of timing of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis

Introduction  

Several studies have indicated that early identification and treatment of patients with severe sepsis using standard supportive care improves outcomes. Earlier treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) may also improve outcomes in severe sepsis. Using a recently constructed integrated severe sepsis database, our objectives in this study were to describe the influence of baseline clinical characteristics on timing of DrotAA treatment in patients with severe sepsis, to evaluate the efficacy of DrotAA with respect to timing of administration, and to examine the association between early intervention with DrotAA and patient outcomes, using adjustments for imbalances.     

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy, a recombinant human activated protein C, across clinically relevant subpopulations in a randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled study of patients with severe sepsis (recombinant human activated protein C worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis [PROWESS]). DESIGN: Univariate and multivariable analysis of prospectively defined subgroups from the PROWESS study. SETTING: A total of 164 medical centers in 11 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 1,690 patients with severe sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report observed 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients for subgroups prospectively defined by demographic data, surgical status, type and site of infection, and clinical and biochemical measures of disease severity. We performed subgroup analyses to explore the consistency of the mortality benefit observed in the overall population and performed tests for both quantitative and qualitative interactions. To examine the magnitude of the treatment benefit with drotrecogin alfa (activated) across the underlying predicted risk of mortality spectrum, we used stepwise logistic regression on PROWESS placebo patients to generate a predicted risk of mortality model that simultaneously included many clinical and biochemical markers of mortality risk. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) has anticoagulant properties, we also present analyses of bleeding and thrombotic events. Actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo for nearly all prospectively defined subgroups. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses showed a consistent relative risk reduction in 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated). Larger absolute risk reductions were found with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with a higher baseline predicted risk of mortality, and actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in all subgroups defined by disease severity measures where a > or = 20% placebo mortality was observed. Although discriminatory power was limited by few observed events, the increased absolute risk of experiencing a serious bleeding event with treatment did not seem to vary according to the baseline predicted risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) to patients with severe sepsis was associated with a significant survival benefit that tended to increase with higher baseline likelihood of death. Current data suggest that the increased risk of bleeding does not vary according to likelihood of death.     

Disseminated intravascular coagulation score is associated with mortality for children with shock

Objective  To evaluate the association between disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score and mortality for children with shock. Design  Retrospective. Setting  Tertiary care, 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit. Patients  A total of 132 children with sepsis or shock admitted from January 2003 to December 2005. Measurements and results  A total of 132 patients less than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of shock or sepsis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 90 survived and 42 died (31.8%). Patients ranged from 6 days to 18 years (median 5.8 years), and were a majority male (63%). Variables associated with mortality included peak DIC score within 24 h of ICU admission, age, weight, volume of blood products transfused, inotrope score, pediatric index of mortality (PIM 2) score, 12-h pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM III) score and presence of mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). Patients with DIC scores ≥ 5 (overt DIC) had 50% mortality, compared to 20% for patients with DIC scores < 5. Overall, a one-point rise in DIC score was associated with an increased risk of mortality after adjusting for age, race, gender, hemodynamic instability, and PRISM III score [OR 1.35 (1.02, 1.78)]. Most patients achieve their peak DIC score within 2 h of ICU admission. Conclusions  This analysis suggests that DIC score, easily calculated early in ICU admission, is associated with mortality for children with sepsis and shock, regardless of initial severity of illness or inotrope use.