Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether and to what extent greater number of projection images obtained at three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) causes overestimation of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DSA (two or three projections), rotational angiography (16 or 32 projections), and 3D TOF MR angiography (12 projections) were performed in 47 stenotic ICAs of 38 symptomatic patients. Two observers independently measured maximum stenosis, and the mean differences among MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were compared. RESULTS: Three rotational and five MR angiograms were nondiagnostic. Seven MR angiograms of ICA stenoses showed a signal void and were excluded from analysis. On the remaining 32 angiograms, mean differences in maximum stenosis for observers 1 and 2, respectively, were 7% (95% CI: 3%, 12%) and 8% (95% CI: 3%, 13%) at MR angiography versus DSA and 2% (95% CI: -2%, 7%) and -1% (95% CI: -5%, 3%) at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. ICA stenosis was graded significantly higher at MR angiography versus DSA, whereas, it was not overestimated at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. The difference in maximum stenosis at MR angiography versus DSA was significantly different from that of MR angiography versus rotational angiography. CONCLUSION: Apparent overestimation of ICA stenosis at 3D TOF MR angiography versus conventional DSA may be partly explained by the greater number of projection images available at 3D TOF MR angiography.     

Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading

PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA. CONCLUSION: DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.     

Vascularization of head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR angiography of the head and neck region has been studied widely, but few studies have been performed concerning the efficacy of MR angiography for the identification of the specific vascular supply of the highly vascular head and neck paragangliomas. In this study, we compared three MR angiography techniques with respect to visualization of branch arteries in the neck and identification of tumor feeders in patients with paragangliomas. METHODS: Fourteen patients with 29 paragangliomas were examined at 1.5 T using 3D phase-contrast (PC), 2D time-of-flight (2D TOF), and multi-slab 3D TOF MR angiography. In the first part of the study, two radiologists independently evaluated the visibility of first-, second-, and third-order branch arteries in the neck. In the second part of the study, the number of feeding arteries for every paraganglioma was determined and compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the standard of reference in this study. RESULTS: Three-dimensional TOF angiography was superior to the other MR angiography techniques studied (P < .05) for depicting branch arteries of the external carotid artery in the neck, but only first- and second-order vessels were reliably shown. DSA showed a total of 78 feeding arteries in the group of patients with 29 paragangliomas, which was superior to what was revealed by all MR angiography techniques studied. More tumor feeders were identified with 3D TOF and 2D TOF angiography than with 3D PC MR angiography (P < .05), with a sensitivity/specificity of 61%/98%, 54%/95%, and 31%/95%, respectively. Sensitivity was lowest for carotid body tumors. CONCLUSION: Compared with intra-arterial DSA, the 3D TOF MR angiography technique was superior to 3D PC and 2D TOF MR angiography for identifying the first- and second-order vessels in the neck. With 3D TOF angiography, more tumor feeders were identified than with the other MR angiography techniques studied. The sensitivity of MR angiography, however, is not high enough to reveal important vascularization. The sensitivity of MR angiography is too low to replace DSA, especially in the presence of carotid body tumors.     

3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值

目的：探讨3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值。方法：对43例临床疑诊颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的患者行2D TOF MRA和3D TRICKS MRA检查,其中31例同期行DSA检查,以颈总动脉法（CC法）计算狭窄率。结果：颈动脉闭塞2支,重度狭窄10支,中度狭窄31支,轻度狭窄25支,正常18支。2D TOF MRA、3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对照,显示狭窄部位均与DSA所示相符。2D TOF MRA高估狭窄程度6支,3D TRICKS MRA高估狭窄程度1支。以DSA为标准,2D TOF MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为91.6%,85.7%,90.3%（K=0.737）;3D TRICKS MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为97.9%,100%,98.4%（K=0.955）。两种方法对诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对评估颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄具有极好的一致性（K=0.955）,明显优于2D TOF MRA（K=0.737,P〈0.05）,是对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄筛查、术前评估、术后随访的最佳检查方法,能基本替代DSA检查。     

Time-resolved MR angiography with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition and time-resolved echo-sharing angiographic technique for hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

PURPOSE: To evaluate the imaging of hemodialysis arteriovenous (AV) fistulas and grafts with use of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) and time-resolved echo-sharing angiographic technique (TREAT) and compare the findings with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vascular tree directly related to AV fistulas and grafts was divided into nine segments. Images of each segment obtained on GRAPPA MR angiography were evaluated for the presence of stenosis, occlusion, and any other disease (eg, pseudoaneurysm) by two independent observers and compared with a consensus reading of the same segments on DSA imaging. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with use of DSA as the gold standard modality, and each image on MR angiography and DSA was rated for quality. Linear-weighted kappa scores were calculated as a measure of interobserver variability in the detection of pathologic processes. RESULTS: A total of 80 segments were evaluated by each observer. For both observers, sensitivity rates for the detection of stenosis, occlusion, and any disease were 100% (95% CI, 52%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 20%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 60%-100%), respectively. For observer 1, specificity rates for the detection of stenosis, occlusion, and any disease were 96% (95% CI, 88%-99%), 100% (95% CI, 94%-100%), and 96% (95% CI, 88%-99%), respectively. For observer 2, the specificity rates for the detection of stenosis, occlusion, and any disease were 93% (95% CI, 84%-98%), 100% (95% CI, 94%-100%), and 93% (95% CI, 84%-97%), respectively. Linear-weighted kappa values for MR angiography and DSA were 0.78+/-0.084 and 0.62+/-0.152, respectively. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved MR angiography with GRAPPA and TREAT offers excellent image quality and provides an accurate and reliable modality for the detection of pathologic processes in hemodialysis AV fistulas and grafts.     

Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is commonly used to visualize the carotid arteries; however, flow void artifacts can appear. Our purpose was to determine the frequency and diagnostic meaning of flow voids by using real patient data, as part of a larger study of MRA compared with the criterion standard, digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: In 1997-2000, 390 consecutive patients with sonographic findings suggestive of carotid artery stenosis were included in this study. All patients subsequently underwent three-dimensional (3D) TOF MRA and conventional DSA. The frequency of flow void artifacts on 3D TOF MRA images were compared with stenosis measurements on DSA images. RESULTS: We recorded 107 flow voids (16%) during 3D TOF MRA of 662 carotid arteries. DSA images were available for comparison in 102 cases. The median percentage of stenosis in this subgroup of flow voids on MRA images was 80%, compared with measurements on DSA images according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Stenoses ranged from 36% to 100% (occlusion). Three flow voids (2.9%) were in the 0-49% range; 11 (10.8%), in the 50-69% range; and 86 (84.3%), in the 70-99% range. Two flow voids (2.0%) represented occlusions. The positive predictive value of a flow void artifact for the presence of severe (70-99%) stenosis was 84.3% (95% CI: 77.3%, 91.4%). CONCLUSION: Flow void artifacts represented severe stenosis in most of the arteries. According to our data, the assumption that flow voids on 3D TOF MRA images represent severe stenosis is justified.     

3.0T高分辨率CE-MRA对颈部血管狭窄的诊断价值

目的探讨三维对比增强磁共振血管成像(3D CE-MRA)在颈部动脉血管狭窄诊断中的临床应用价值。方法对23例临床拟诊颈部动脉血管狭窄行数字减影血管造影(DSA)的患者行颈部3D CE-MRA。将两种方法检查结果进行相关性比较。结果 23例患者共230个节段血管,3D CE-MRA显示了227个节段,共诊断出74处(32.6%)狭窄,其中28处轻度狭窄,22处中度狭窄,20处重度狭窄,4处闭塞;DSA共显示了230个节段的血管,共诊断出69处(30.4%)血管狭窄,其中24处轻度狭窄,23处中度狭窄,19处重度狭窄,3处闭塞。与DSA相比,3DCE-MRA对颈部动脉轻度、中度、重度狭窄及动脉闭塞的显示敏感性均为100%,特异性分别为85.71%、90.91%、90%和75%,两种检查方法对颈部动脉狭窄程度的判断有良好的一致性(κ=0.921,P=0.000)。结论 3.0T 3DCE-MRA能够可靠的评价颈部动脉狭窄性病变,基本可以替代DSA检查。     

MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare Gd-enhanced breath-hold fast imaging with steady-state precession (Gd-FISP) with unenhanced time-of-flight (TOF) sequences in evaluating internal carotid arteries (ICAs). METHOD: Thirty patients underwent three unenhanced TOF sequences [2D traveling saturation (Travelsat); 3D tilted optimized nonsaturated excitation (TONE); TOF 3D Multislab] and two breath-hold 3D Gd-FISP sequences with automated intravenous contrast agent injection (axial and coronal). ICAs were classified as normal (no stenosis); with mild (<30%), moderate (30-70%), or severe stenosis; or occluded (100%). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with aortic arch injection was used as a reference technique. RESULTS: DSA revealed 20 normal ICAs; 11 mild, 9 moderate, and 14 severe stenoses; and 2 occlusions. DSA and all MR angiography (MRA) sequences diagnosed the occlusion of four common carotid arteries. The TOF 2D overestimated 10 stenoses, TOF 3D TONE 9, and TOF 3D Multislab 5; Gd-FISP 3D overestimated only 2 of them, reaching the highest sensitivity and specificity for severe stenoses. Significant differences were found between the overestimation of Gd-FISP and each of the three unenhanced sequences (0.0020 < p < 0.0313, Wilcoxon and McNemar tests). Severe artifacts were observed with TOF techniques only. CONCLUSION: Gd-FISP is an interesting, largely artifact-free improvement for MRA of ICAs.     

Comparison of intraarterial MR angiography at 3.0 T with X-ray digital subtraction angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis in swine

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of catheter-directed intraarterial (IA) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3.0 T with that of x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the measurement of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unilateral hemodynamically significant RAS (>50%) was induced surgically in six pigs with use of reverse cable ties. One to two weeks after surgery, each pig underwent x-ray DSA and MR angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). X-ray DSA was performed before and after PTA of RAS by injection of iodinated contrast agent through a 5-F multiple-side hole angiographic catheter placed in the abdominal aorta under fluoroscopic guidance. MR angiography of RAS was performed before and after PTA of RAS on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager with use of gadolinium-based contrast agent. MR angiography and DSA images were analyzed with the full width at half maximum method. Percent stenosis measurements between x-ray DSA and MR angiography were compared with a paired t test and were correlated with linear regression and Bland Altman analysis (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Six cases of RAS were induced and imaged successfully with DSA and MR angiography techniques before and after PTA. On x-ray DSA, median stenoses was 64% (95% CI 57%-80%) before PTA and 20% (95% CI 5%-32%) after PTA. Corresponding MR angiography median stenosis measurement was 69% (95% CI 58%-80%) before PTA and 26% (95% CI 16%-36%) after PTA. A paired t test comparison did not show a difference between DSA and MR angiography (P = .16). RAS measurements on MR angiography correlated closely (P < .01) with DSA measurements (r(2) = 0.92). CONCLUSION: In swine, the accuracy of catheter-directed IA MR angiography with use of a clinical 3.0-T MR imaging unit for the measurement of RAS was similar to that of conventional x-ray DSA.     

Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracies of color duplex ultrasonography (US) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and to assess interobserver agreement regarding contrast-enhanced MR angiographic findings in patients suspected of having peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients provided signed informed consent. Two hundred ninety-five patients referred for diagnostic and preinterventional work-up of PAD with duplex US also underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Data sets were reviewed for presence or absence of 50% or greater luminal reduction, which indicated hemodynamically significant stenosis, and to determine interobserver agreement. At duplex US, a peak systolic velocity ratio of 2.5 or greater indicated significant stenosis. Primary outcome measures were differences between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis, as assessed with the McNemar test, and interobserver agreement between the two contrast-enhanced MR angiogram readings, expressed as quadratic weighted kappa values. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the reference standard. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients had at least one hemodynamically significant stenotic lesion at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, duplex US, or both examinations. One hundred fifty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA. The quadratic weighted kappa for agreement regarding the presence of 50% or greater stenosis at contrast-enhanced MR angiography was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 0.91). Sensitivity of duplex US was 76% (95% CI: 69%, 82%); specificity, 93% (95% CI: 91%, 95%); and accuracy, 89%. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were 84% (95% CI: 78%, 89%) and 97% (95% CI: 95%, 98%), respectively; accuracy was 94%. Sensitivity (P = .002) and specificity (P = .03) of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Results of this prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex US provide evidence that contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more sensitive and specific for diagnosis and preinterventional work-up of PAD.     

Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for stenosis depiction in malfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts in 48 consecutive patients. Vascular tree of accesses was divided into between three and eight segments depending on access type (AVF or AVG) and length of venous outflow. Images obtained with MR and DSA were interpreted by two MR radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively, who were blinded to information from each other and other studies. DSA was reference standard for stenosis detection. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of contrast-enhanced MR in detection of vascular segments containing hemodynamically significant (> or =50%) stenosis were calculated. Linear-weighted kappa statistic was calculated for contrast-enhanced MR and DSA to determine interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection. RESULTS: A total of 282 vascular segments were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced MR depicted three false-positive stenoses and all but two of 70 significant stenoses depicted with DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MR in detection of vessel segments with significant stenoses were 97% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), 99% (95% CI: 96%, 100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%), and 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%), respectively. MR demonstrated significant stenosis in four of five nondiagnostic DSA segments, whereas DSA showed no significant stenosis in four nondiagnostic MR segments. Linear-weighted kappa statistic for interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) for MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97) for DSA. CONCLUSION: MR angiography depicts stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses but has limited clinical value as result of current inability to perform MR-guided access interventions after stenosis detection. MR of dysfunctional access should be considered only if nondiagnostic vascular segment is present at DSA.     

Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate use of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in the assessment of suspected arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving kidney transplants (26 single-kidney transplants and two en block transplants) with suspected arterial inflow stenosis were examined with two MR angiography sequences: gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) imaging and 3D phase-contrast imaging. Twenty-four of these patients then were examined using the gold standards: either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 23) or surgery (n = 1). MR angiography and DSA studies were independently and prospectively analyzed for the presence of arterial stenoses (mild [<50%], severe [50-90%], or critical [>90%]) in the iliac, anastomotic, and renal artery segments. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the MR angiography sequences for ability to detect or exclude significant (> or = 50%) arterial stenoses. RESULTS: In 22 single-kidney transplants, DSA showed eight significant stenoses in 66 arterial segments. MR angiograms adequately showed 66 of 66 segments (prospective observers) and 64 of 66 segments (each retrospective observer), which were subsequently evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in revealing significant stenoses were 100% and 98% (prospective analysis), 88% and 98% (retrospective observer 1), and 86% and 100% (retrospective observer 2). Concordance between observers showed kappa values exceeding .85 for all comparisons except the analysis of phase-contrast series (kappa = .62). In one en block transplant, DSA showed that stenosis was greater than 90%, although it had been graded at less than 50% with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography accurately evaluated arterial inflow in single-kidney transplants.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study

A contrast-enhanced, gradient-echo 3D pulse sequence providing angiographic information in 24 s was tested in five healthy subjects and used prospectively in 21 patients for the investigation of the cervical arteries. Indications included suspected stenosis of the carotid (in 13), or vertebral arteries (in 1), carotid dissection (3), variants of the branches of the aortic arch (2) and extracranial carotid aneurysms (2). The results in all patients were compared with those of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In patients with carotid stenosis, they were also compared with high-resolution 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Good quality MR angiograms of the neck vessels were obtained with the fast 3D sequence in 20 of the 21 patients. One claustrophobic patient was unable to co-operate. The degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded correctly (compared to DSA) in 21 of 24 cases (87.5 %). Two mild stenoses were overestimated as moderate using the fast MR sequence and one high-grade stenosis was misdiagnosed as a complete occlusion. Carotid dissection was confirmed in one case and correctly excluded in two. Four extracranial ICA aneurysms in two patients, arterial variants and stenosis of the origin of the vertebral artery were correctly diagnosed using the contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. Three-dimensional TOF MRA was unsuccessful due to motion artefacts in half of the cases of ICA stenosis. Received: 6 August 1998 Accepted: 21 December 1998     

Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare dynamic three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the detection of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with carotid stenosis of more than 50% at sonography prospectively underwent both MR angiography and DSA. The overall quality of each DSA and MR angiographic study was analyzed. For each craniocervical vessel (brachiocephalic, common carotid, subclavian, and vertebral arteries) (n = 231), ostial stenosis was graded as follows: normal, mild (<50%), moderate to severe (>50%), or occlusion. MR angiographic and DSA results were compared by means of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs). RESULTS: The overall diagnostic quality of MR angiography was excellent or adequate. Three studies were inadequate because of a poor signal-to-noise ratio (13 of 231 arteries) or a coverage error (five of 231 arteries). Findings at MR angiography and DSA agreed on the degree of stenosis (Rs = 0.82, P <.001). No cases of stenosis of more than 50% were missed at MR angiography. However, some discrepancies were noted between vertebral arteries and the other craniocervical vessels. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in other craniocervical vessels were 100% and 98%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for stenosis of more than 50% in the vertebral arteries were 100% and 85%, respectively. Findings at MR angiography tended to result in overestimation of the degree of ostial stenosis, especially in vertebral arteries (10 [15%] of 66 arteries). CONCLUSION: MR angiography is useful to rule out ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. MR angiography is an adequate diagnostic tool for ostial stenosis, except in the vertebral artery.     

Colour flow Doppler ultrasound of the carotid bifurcation: can it replace routine angiography before carotid endarterectomy?

The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of colour flow Doppler ultrasound (CFD) and its potential to replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) before carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients undergoing CFD of the carotid bifurcation in our department over a period of 1-1/2 years for whom both CFD and DSA results were available were included in the study. We evaluated the feasibility of CFD, its diagnostic accuracy and its potential to diagnose clinically significant stenosis (50%, 70% and 90% NASCET type diameter stenosis) compared with DSA. 225 carotid bifurcations in 116 patients met the criteria for evaluation (biplane arterial DSA without superimposition). Data analysis yielded the following diagnostic performance of CFD: sensitivity for a 50% stenosis 91.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.3--96.2%), specificity 93.2% (95% CI 87.1--96.8%) and accuracy 92.4% (95% CI 88.4--95.4%); sensitivity for a 70% stenosis 89.2% (95% CI 81.9--94.1%), specificity 96.2% (95% CI 90.5--98.6%) and accuracy 92.4% (95% CI 88.4--95.4%). In 9 of 116 cases, carotid angiography was used to evaluate inconclusive CFD results. DSA disclosed relevant information not suspected by CFD in only 1 of the 116 cases. Thus, 91% (106/116) of the angiographies could have been dispensed with without loss of information. One major stroke occurred during diagnostic DSA. We conclude that DSA of the carotid arteries is unnecessary when CFD is unequivocal. The diagnostic gain of DSA must be counterweighted against its potential risks.     

Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the reference standard for assessing carotid arteries, it is uncomfortable for patients and has a small risk of disabling stroke and death. These problems have fueled the use of spiral CT angiography and MR angiography. We prospectively compared elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography with conventional DSA for detecting carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Eighty carotid arteries (in 40 symptomatic patients) were assessed. Elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiographic data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reconstruction techniques. All patients had been referred for DSA evaluation on the basis of findings at Doppler sonography, which served as a screening method (degree of stenosis > or = 70% or inconclusive results). Degree of carotid stenosis estimated by using the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: Significant correlation with DSA was found for stenosis degree for both elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiography; however, the correlation coefficient was higher for MR than for CT angiography (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.86). Underestimation of stenoses of 70-99% occurred in one case with elliptic centric MR angiography (a 70% stenosis was underestimated as 65%) and in nine cases with spiral CT angiography, in comparison to DSA findings. Overestimation occurred in two cases with MR angiography (stenoses of 65-67% were overestimated as 70-75%). With CT, overestimation occurred in seven cases; a stenosis of 60% in one case was overestimated as 70%. Both techniques confirmed the three cases of carotid occlusion. With elliptic centric MR angiography, carotid stenoses of 70% or greater were detected with high sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 95.2%; likelihood ratio (LR) for a positive test result, 20.4; and ratio of LR(+) to LR(-), -0.3. With spiral CT angiography, sensitivity, specificity, LR(+), and LR(+):LR(-) were 74.3%, 97.6%, 31.2, and 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more accurate than spiral CT angiography to adequately evaluate carotid stenosis. Furthermore, elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be adequate to replace conventional DSA in most patients examined.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) is a proven diagnostic tool in evaluation of the carotid arteries; however, few studies have addressed its accuracy in the vertebrobasilar system. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRA compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection of vertebrobasilar disease. METHODS: Forty patients with suspected atherosclerotic disease of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations underwent CE MRA on a 1.5 T MR imaging scanner by use of a coronal 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence after intravenous injection of gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid. All patients had correlative DSA within a 1-month period. CE MRA images were randomized and then independently assessed by 2 observers who were blinded to the DSA results. DSA examinations were analyzed in a similar manner. Each observer was asked to report the presence or absence of clinically significant stenosis (>50%), occlusion, fistula, aneurysm, and dissection. The MRA findings were then correlated with DSA. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for detection of disease in the entire carotid and vertebrobasilar systems were 90% and 97%, respectively; for the carotid system alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively; and for the vertebrobasilar system they were 88% and 98% respectively. The overall interobserver reliability was 98% (kappa = 0.92). CONCLUSION: CE MRA is accurate at detecting disease not only in the carotid vessels, but also in the vertebrobasilar circulation, and has the potential to provide a comprehensive and noninvasive evaluation of the head and neck arteries in a single study.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since 1996, several preliminary studies have shown the usefulness of contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for imaging supraaortic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A blinded comparison of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR angiography with conventional DSA was performed in 120 patients (240 arteries). MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T magnet with gradient overdrive equipment, by using a coronal radiofrequency-spoiled 3D fast low-angle-shot sequence after the intravenous injection of gadodiamide. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis of the internal carotid artery were applied on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and conventional catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Grading of stenoses on MR angiograms agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 89% of arteries. In the severe stenosis group (70-99%), agreement was 93%. All internal carotid occlusions (n = 28) and seven of nine pseudo-occlusions were accurately detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The correlation between MR angiography and DSA for determination of minimal, moderate, and severe stenoses and occlusion was statistically significant (r = 0.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation with a large number of patients confirms that contrast-enhanced MR angiography could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the treatment of patients with carotid artery disease.     

Comparative assessment of helical CT-angiography, 2D TOF MR-angiography and 3D gadolinium enhanced MRA in aorto-iliac occlusive disease

PURPOSE: To compare helical CT-angiography (CTA) and two techniques of MR angiography (MRA) to conventional angiography in aorto-iliac occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 22 patients (4 for preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and 18 for peripheral vascular disease) were imaged using four techniques: digital subtraction angiography ("gold standard"), 2D TOF MR angiography, 3D Gd-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography. Source (CTA and 2D TOF MRA) and MIPed images (after subtraction measures before and after gadolinium injection for 3D Gd-MRA) were reviewed. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of significant (>50%) stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries were respectively: 38%, 89%, 77% for 2D TOF MRA; 75%, 71%, 72% for 3D Gd-MRA and 95%, 90%, 92% for CTA. Excluding the internal iliac arteries, results were 54%, 96%, 88% for 2D TOF MRA; 96%, 80%, 83% for 3D Gd-MRA and 92%, 93%, 95% for CTA. CONCLUSION: 3D Gd-MRA, a technique with potential for further improvement, is superior to 2D TOF MRA for detecting significant stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries. Results at Gd-MRA are nearly similar to those at CTA (after excluding internal iliac arteries). Results at Gd-MRA are not affected by calcified plaque.     

High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on maximum intensity projection images of time-of-flight MR angiography: a new sign for intraplaque hemorrhage

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of the high signal intensity halo sign as a new marker of a fresh or recent intraplaque hemorrhage on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 consecutive patients were included in this study. High-resolution MRI using 3-inch surface coils was performed on a 1.5T scanner before the carotid endarterectomy. TOF MR angiograms and T2-weighted, T1-weighted pre- and postcontrast fast spin echo images were obtained. The surgical and pathological findings of the carotid artery were analyzed and correlated with the MRI findings. RESULTS: A total of 42 atheromas (31.1%) had a fresh or recent intraplaque hemorrhage on the surgicopathological findings. A total of 38 (90.5%) of these patients showed high signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on the MIP images of TOF MR angiography. The high signal intensity halo sign, compared with the surgical and histopathological findings, demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 91%, 83%, 72%, and 95%, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) in the detection of an intraplaque hemorrhage. The multisequence approach suggested the presence of an intraplaque hemorrhage with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93%, 85%, 74%, and 96%, respectively, with a 95% CI. CONCLUSION: High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on the MIP images of TOF MR angiography is useful in the noninvasive detection of a fresh or recent carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.