Race and the decision to refer for coronary revascularization: the effect of physician awareness of patient ethnicity

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess whether there were differences, relative to racial ethnicity, in coronary revascularization recommendations made by a panel that had no knowledge of the patients' ethnicity. BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization is employed less frequently in African American than in white patients. It is unclear whether this utilization pattern is driven by clinical differences between the two populations or by nonclinical factors. METHODS: Data were reviewed from 938 (26.5% African American, 73.5% white) consecutive cardiac catheterizations done between 1993 and 1995. Revascularization recommendations were made by cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons provided with the patients' clinical and angiographic data, but without knowledge of their ethnicity. Revascularization recommendations were compared between African American and white patients and correlated with clinical characteristics. RESULTS: No difference was noted in the percentage of African American and white patients recommended for revascularization, without reference to whether the recommendation was for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) 40 vs. 46%, p = NS). African Americans were recommended more frequently for PTCA (22 vs. 18%, p = NS), whereas CABG was recommended for more white patients (28 vs. 18%, p = 0.002). Significantly fewer African Americans had disease in the left main or left anterior descending coronary artery or in multiple arteries. After adjusting for age, co-morbidity, left ventricular dysfunction and the extent of coronary disease, African Americans were more likely to have a recommendation for PTCA (odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 2.11, p = 0.08) and less likely to have a recommendation for CABG (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that when only clinical factors are considered, the rates of recommendations for revascularization will be similar for white and African American patients; but the type of revascularization procedure may differ by ethnicity and may depend, in part, on clinical factors.     

Physicians' judgments of survival after medical management and mortality risk reduction due to revascularization procedures for patients with coronary artery disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE:s: To assess the accuracy of physicians' judgments of survival probability for medically managed patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and of the absolute risk reduction of mortality due to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for such patients; and relationships among these judgments and the physicians' propensity to perform revascularization. DESIGN: Two surveys (for three-vessel or two-vessel CAD) for patients presenting with stable CAD, currently managed medically, and without other life-limiting problems. SETTING: Multiple educational conferences, 1996-1997. PARTICIPANTS: Conference attendees. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Main outcomes were proportions of patients for whom the physicians would recommend revascularization (CABG for three-vessel CAD, CABG or PTCA for two-vessel CAD), and judgments of the proportions of medically managed patients who would be alive after 5 years, 7 years, and 11 years, and of absolute risk reduction of mortality due to CABG (or PTCA for two-vessel CAD). At least one half of the participants judged the survival rate of medically managed patients with three-vessel or two-vessel CAD to be less than the lowest rates supported by the best available evidence. More than one fourth judged the absolute risk reduction due to CABG to be higher than the highest values based on such evidence. Physicians' propensity to perform revascularization correlated inversely with their judgments of survival given medical management, and with their judgments of absolute risk reduction due to revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may overuse revascularization because of excessive pessimism about survival of medically managed patients, and excessive optimism about the survival benefits of revascularization.     

Correlation of arteriosclerosis obliterans of the lower extremity with coronary artery disease

To ascertain the correlation between arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities and coronary artery disease (CAD), 69 patients with lower extremity ASO were observed. Based on clinical symptoms, the patients were categorized as group A: 52 with intermittent claudication and group B: 17 with angina pectoris. All patients underwent angiography of both lower extremities and the heart. Results were as follows: 1. In group A, 33 patients had significant coronary stenosis with single (16 cases), double (12 cases) and triple (five cases) vessel disease. Sixteen patients had histories of myocardial infarction and two had vasospastic angina. In group B, 15 patients had significant coronary stenosis with single (five cases), double (six cases) and triple (four cases) vessel disease including two cases involving the left main trunk. Six patients had histories of myocardial infarction and two had vasospastic angina. 2. Electrocardiography revealed that 37 patients in group A and 14 patients in group B had abnormal ECGs as abnormal Q waves and ST-T changes. However, 10 patients in group A and three patients in group B had significant coronary stenosis despite their normal ECGs. 3. According to the sites of stenotic lesions, all 69 patients with ASO were classified in four types; as diffuse, pelvic, ilio-femoral and femoral. The incidence of CAD did not differ among these four types. 4. In group A, 38 patients experienced revascularization of ASO; 36 cases by bypass grafting, and two by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Ten patients received cardiac revascularization including three cases with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and seven cases with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In group B, 13 patients received revascularization of ASO with bypass grafting. Eleven patients had coronary revascularization including seven cases with CABG and four cases with PTCA. 5. Fourteen of the 69 patients received revascularization for both ASO and CAD. In conclusion, there is a highly significant coincidence of CAD in patients with ASO, and CAD is often silent. These data indicate that routine coronary angiography is necessary for detecting and preventing CAD in all patients with ASO. Coronary artery revascularization, especially PTCA, can be indicated prior to lower extremity revascularization.     

Underuse of cardiac procedures: do women, ethnic minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive needed revascularization?

BACKGROUND: Women, ethnic minorities, and uninsured persons receive fewer cardiac procedures than affluent white male patients do, but rates of use are crude indicators of quality. The important question is, Do women, minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive cardiac procedures when they need them? OBJECTIVE: To measure receipt of necessary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) overall; by patient sex, ethnicity, and payer status; and by availability of on-site revascularization. DESIGN: Retrospective, randomized medical record review. SETTING: 13 of the 24 hospitals in New York City that provide coronary angiography. PATIENTS: 631 patients who had coronary angiography in 1992 and met the RAND expert panel criteria for necessary revascularization. MEASUREMENTS: The percentage of patients who had CABG surgery or PTCA was measured, as were variations in use rates by sex, ethnic group, insurance status, and availability of on-site revascularization. Clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from medical records to identify patients who met the panel criteria for necessary revascularization. Receipt of revascularization was determined from state reports, medical records, and information provided by cardiologists. RESULTS: Overall, 74% (95% CI, 71% to 77%) of patients who met the panel criteria for necessary revascularization had CABG surgery or PTCA (underuse rate, 26%). No differences were found in use rates by patient sex, ethnic group, or payer status, but hospitals that provided on-site revascularization had higher use rates (76% [CI, 74% to 79%]) than hospitals that did not provide it (59% [CI, 56% to 65%]) (P < 0.01). In hospitals that did not provide on-site revascularization, uninsured patients were less likely to have revascularization recommended to them (52% [CI, 32% to 78%]); rates of recommendation for patients with private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid were 82%, 91%, and 75%, respectively (P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Although revascularization procedures are substantially underused, no variations in rate of use by sex, ethnic group, or payer status were seen among patients treated in hospitals that provide CABG surgery and PTCA. However, underuse was significantly greater in hospitals that do not provide these procedures, particularly among uninsured persons.     

Difference in the mortality of the CABRI diabetic and nondiabetic populations and its relation to coronary artery disease and the revascularization mode

In diabetics with coronary artery disease (CAD), there remains uncertainty as to whether revascularization by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is preferable. To address this, 4-year mortality and level of pre- and postrevascularization angiographic CAD (measured by a series of coronary scores) were compared between both diabetics and nondiabetics and between revascularization modes in the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization Investigation population as a whole, and then substratified by diabetic status and then by procedure to which they were randomized. The 1,054 randomized subjects contained 125 diabetics (11.9%) who had significantly greater mortality than nondiabetics (RR 2.19, p = 0.001). Among diabetics or nondiabetics, there was no significant mortality difference between those randomized to PTCA versus those to CABG. Diabetics randomized to PTCA and those to CABG had higher mortalities than respective nondiabetics; the association reached significance only in the former (RR 2.41, p = 0.002). All subgroups had similar prerevascularization CAD. Postrevascularization residual CAD was consistently significantly greater in PTCA than in respective CABG subgroups. Most measurements of CAD were greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic subgroups, but none was significant. In the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization Investigation, diabetics had double the mortality of nondiabetics; this difference was statistically significant both for the entire population and for those randomized to PTCA, but not for those randomized to CABG. Among diabetics or nondiabetics, there was no significant mortality difference between PTCA and CABG. The higher diabetic mortality was more likely related to more rapid disease progression than to greater postrevascularization disease.     

Ten-year outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and comparison with the results of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS)

The 10-year results of randomized trials comparing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and medical treatment are not available yet. The aim of this evaluation was to compare our 10-year follow-up results after PTCA in patients with single-vessel CAD with the 10-year follow-up results after CABG and medical treatment in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) trial. We evaluated the clinical outcome of 509 patients with single-vessel CAD 10 years after coronary angioplasty. The data were compared with the results of 214 patients with single-vessel CAD after CABG or medical treatment from the CASS trial. End points were defined as death and myocardial infarction. Statistical evaluation was performed by life-table analysis and 2-sided Fisher's exact test. The rate of survival was 86% 10 years after PTCA compared with 85% after CABG and 82% after medical treatment in patients from the CASS trial (p = NS). Survival free from myocardial infarction was 77% after coronary angioplasty, 70% after CABG, and 72% after medical treatment (p = NS). Thus, in patients with single-vessel CAD, infarct-free survival 10 years after coronary angioplasty compared favorably with the results after bypass surgery or medical treatment from the CASS trial.     

Catheter-based percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of a catheter-based laser system for percutaneous myocardial revascularization and analyses the first clinical acute and long-term results in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe angina pectoris. BACKGROUND: In patients with CAD and intractable angina who are not candidates for either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) has been developed as a new treatment that results in reduced angina pectoris and increased exercise capacity. However, surgical thoracotomy is required for TMR with considerable morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A catheter-based system has been developed that allows creation of laser channels in the myocardium from within the left ventricular cavity. Laser energy generated by a Holmium: YAG (Cardiogenesis Corporation, Sunnyvale, California) laser was transmitted to the myocardium via a flexible optical fiber capped by an optic lens. The optical fiber was maneuvered to the target area under biplane fluoroscopy through a coaxial catheter system permitting movement in three dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with severe CAD not amenable to either CABG or PTCA and refractory angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiologic Society [CCS] Angina Scale Class III-IV) were included in the study. Ischemic regions were identified by coronary angiography and confirmed by thallium scintigraphy. The percutaneous myocardial revascularization (PMR) procedure was successfully completed in all patients. In 29 patients, one vascular territory of the left ventricle and in 5 patients, two vascular territories were treated. Eight to fifteen channels were created in each ischemic region. Major periprocedural complications were limited to an episode of arterial bleeding requiring surgical repair. There was one death early after PMR, due to a myocardial infarction (MI) in a nontreated region. Clinical follow-up at 6 months (17 patients) demonstrated significant improvement of angina pectoris (CCS class before PMR: 3.0+/-0.0, six months after PMR: 1.3+/-0.8, p<0.0001) and increased exercise capacity (exercise time on standard bicycle ergometry before PMR: 384+/-141 s, six months after PMR: 514+/-158 s, p<0.05), but thallium scintigraphy failed to show improved perfusion of the laser treated regions. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous myocardial revascularization is a new safe and feasible therapeutic option in patients with CAD and severe angina pectoris not amenable to either CABG or PTCA. Initial results show immediate and significant improvement of symptoms and exercise capacity but evidence of improved myocardial perfusion is still lacking.     

Long-term survival in 11,661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: a report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Studies of survival of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) in the prestent era suggested that outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) are similar to those after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in subsets of coronary severity. The purpose of this study of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) was to examine the association between treatment and survival up to 5 years in patients with MVD enrolled from 1995 through 1998. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on patient characteristics were obtained at the time of the initial coronary angiography. Survival was determined through data linkage to the provincial Bureau of Vital Statistics. Risk-adjusted hazard ratios were calculated to compare different treatments. In the 11,661 patients with MVD, CABG was the initial therapy in 3782, PCI in 3540, and medical therapy in 4339. Cumulative 5-year survival was 91.4% with CABG, 91.9% with PCI, and 82.9% with medical therapy (P <.001). Hazard ratios were CABG: medical 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.71), PCI: medical 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.74), and CABG: PCI 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96). Analysis across coronary severity groups revealed a benefit of CABG compared with PCI only in the group with severe left main CAD: 0.30 (95% CI 0.17-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter clinical setting, MVD patients treated with revascularization have significantly higher 5-year survival rate than do those treated medically. Risk-adjusted comparison reveals PCI treatment to be associated with long-term survival similar to treatment with CABG in all coronary severity subgroups except the group with severe left main coronary artery disease. Patient selection factors are likely to be contributing to these findings.     

Coronary revascularization: influence on ventricular arrhythmias

Myocardial ischemia may cause severe cardiac arrhythmias. In the present study, the influence of revascularization on ventricular arrhythmias was investigated. A total of 68 patients (61 male, 7 female; mean age 53 years) with coronary artery disease was divided into three groups: Group A (21 patients) underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA); Group B (37 patients) had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); and Group C were 10 patients who served as controls, who had simple coronary angiography. All patients had a Holter ECG on the day before angiography. PTCA patients and controls were restudied on the day after the procedure, while in Group B, Holter ECG was repeated three weeks after surgery. Groups A and B were again studied 18 months after the first Holter ECG. The PTCA group showed a slight reduction in complex arrhythmias immediately following PTCA, which increased again after 18 months; the CABG group, however, revealed a significant increase in complex arrhythmias three weeks after bypass surgery, but a decrease after 18 months. There was no significant change in the control group before or after angiography. Thus, successful revascularization has no influence on ventricular arrhythmias after 18 months.     

Late outcome of multivessel coronary artery disease after angioplasty or bypass surgery

Background. Results from randomized trials to determine optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary disease are not yet available. Thus, the early and late outcomes of 191 PTCA and 221 CABG patients done in 1985-86 were evaluated. Methods and Results. CABG patients selected had more coronary risk factors and more severe coronary artery disease compared to PTCA patients. Comparison of the initial outcome showed that clinical success without major cardiovascular events was similar (93.7% for PTCA vs. 90.0% for CABG; p=n.s.). Five year followup was obtained in 99.0% of PTCA patients and 94.4% of CABG patients. In the PTCA group, 89.8% were alive, 4.8% had sustained an MI, and repeat revascularization was required in 46.8%. In the CABG group, 87.1% were alive, 3.2% had had a MI, and 3.5% required repeat revascularization. Statistical comparison demonstrated no difference between the groups in survival or late cardiac events, but rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher for PTCA patients (p less than 0.0001). Incompleteness of revascularization (p<0.01) was independently associated with an increased need for repeat revascularization in the PTCA group. In the CABG group, depressed left ventricular function (p less than 0.001) and female sex (p<0.01) were associated with lower survival rates. An analysis of cost per patient showed that the strategies were comparable. Conclusions. PTCA and CABG in multivessel disease patients have similar early results and comparable rates of survival and late cardiac events. Significantly more repeat revascularization is required in PTCA patients to maintain these results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early and late results of coronary angioplasty and bypass in octogenarians

Early and late results were evaluated for octogenarians undergoing first time revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study group consisted of 142 patients with CABG and 53 with PTCA. The groups with PTCA and CABG differed with respect to number of patients with angina class III to IV (92 and 67%, respectively; p less than 0.001), number with 3-vessel disease (34 and 77%, respectively; p less than 0.001), presence of left main trunk disease (2 and 24%, respectively; p less than 0.001) and number with normal or mildly impaired left ventricular function (82 and 65%, respectively; p less than 0.034). The groups with PTCA and CABG had similar procedural complications, including myocardial infarction (6 and 4%, respectively) and stroke (0 and 4%, respectively). Hospital mortality was low (6% with CABG and 2% with PTCA). Three year survival, excluding hospital mortality, was 87% in patients with CABG and 81% in those with PTCA (p = 0.493). Octogenarians underwent revascularization procedures with relatively low morbidity and mortality. In regard to the excellent long-term survival, "very" elderly patients with severe coronary artery disease should be considered for revascularization despite advanced age.     

Staged revascularization in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients undergoing bypass surgery experience a higher mortality and morbidity. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and value of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) as a bridge to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in high-risk patients with refractory unstable angina or cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We present 11 seriously unstable patients with severe multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing culprit vessel PTCA. Angioplasty was performed not as a definitive procedure but rather as a bridge to surgical revascularization. All the patients had sustained at least one myocardial infarction prior to catheterization, all had refractory unstable angina, eight patients had only a single patent coronary artery, and five patients were in cardiogenic shock. RESULTS: Following PTCA, all patients enjoyed a stable in-hospital period. One patient died 12 weeks after successful PTCA while awaiting second CABG. Seven patients subsequently underwent CABG and are doing well. The remaining three patients were also advised to undergo CABG, but elected to continue medical management. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angioplasty of the culprit vessel may play a role as a bridge to surgery in critically ill patients.     

The impact of coronary revascularization on long-term outcomes after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm]

BACKGROUND: Complications due to undetectable coronary artery disease are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of our study was to evaluate the importance of significant coronary artery disease identification and the impact of coronary revascularization on early and late outcomes after surgical repair of AAA. METHODS: Between January 1994 and July 2004, 210 patients (204 males and 6 females, mean age 68 +/- 12 years) were candidates to elective surgical repair of AAA. Coronary angiography was performed in 122 patients (58%) in presence of angina symptoms, previous myocardial infarction, echocardiographic or scinti-scan evidence of myocardial ischemia. Coronary revascularization was performed in 83 patients (39.5%). The population was divided into two groups: coronary artery bypass graft/coronary angioplasty (CABG/PTCA) + AAA group (83 patients submitted to CABG surgery [n = 61], or PTCA [n = 22], for significant coronary artery disease before surgical repair of AAA), AAA group (127 patients without significant coronary artery disease, operated for AAA). Follow-up (90% complete) had a mean duration of 42 +/- 23 months. RESULTS: CABG/PTCA + AAA group compared to AAA group presented major symptoms of angina (p = 0.001), higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction (67 vs 10%, p < 0.0001), lower mean value of left ventricular ejection fraction (50 vs 54%, p = 0.01). Operative mortality was 0.95%, and was not related to any cardiac morbidity: operative mortality was observed in the AAA group (2 patients died of anossic cerebral damage and respiratory failure) and was absent in the CABG/PTCA + AAA group (p = 0.8). The overall 8-year survival in the AAA group and in the CABG/PTCA + AAA group was 80 +/- 11 vs 95 +/- 2.8%, respectively (p = 0.7). Freedom from cardiac late death and freedom from cardiac events (recurrence of angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure) were high in both groups (93 +/- 6.4 vs 97 +/- 2.3%, p = 0.6; and 91 +/- 6.6 vs 89 +/- 6.7%, p = 0.5, respectively). In the CABG/PTCA + AAA group symptoms for angina (p = 0.0002) and dyspnea (p < 0.0001) significantly improved during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Significant coronary artery disease was not negligible (39.5%) in patients candidates to surgical repair of AAA. Identification and correction of coronary artery disease prior to AAA surgery is the most important strategy to reduce the risk of vascular procedure. The beneficial impact of coronary revascularization on early and late outcomes is evident, in terms of satisfactory survival and freedom from cardiac adverse events. Therefore, coronary angiography is strongly suggested to optimize early and long-term results.     

Need for coronary artery bypass grafting in Newfoundland and Labrador: the impact of increased demand

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, growth of coronary revascularization in Canada has been substantial. It was hypothesized that as coronary angiography (CA) rates increased, referral for necessary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) would also increase, and include patients with multivessel disease and class I to III angina who required elective surgery. Furthermore, it was proposed that the number of CABG surgeries needed would increase at a similar rate to that of CA. METHODS: An incident cohort of patients who received CA in 1998/1999 was identified, and the group referred for CABG was followed. Clinical characteristics, appropriateness and necessity scores using specific criteria, and waiting times were evaluated and compared with a similar cohort from 1994/1995. Utilization data for coronary revascularization procedures from 1994 to 2002 were reviewed. RESULTS: Between 1994/1995 and 1998/1999, the number of CAs per year increased by 37%. The inappropriateness rate for CA was 4% in 1998/1999. The proportion of patients diagnosed with critical coronary artery disease increased from 68% in 1994/1995 to 74% in 1998/1999. The number referred for CABG increased by 48%, and the number for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) increased by 137%. The increase in the number referred for CABG was attributable to the increase in the number of patients with less severe symptoms who required delayed elective CABG. The necessity rate for CABG in the referred group was 94% in 1994/1995 and 95% in 1998/1999. A further 91 patients were identified who needed CABG but did not receive it, 86% of whom had PTCA. From 1999 to 2002, the annual growth rate in those referred for CABG was higher than the growth rate for CA. CONCLUSIONS: With the growth in CA, the rate of discovery of high risk coronary anatomy actually increased. Growth in CABG volume was attributable to growth in the need for elective surgery in patients with class I to III angina. The rate of CABG increased disproportionately to the rate of CA, despite higher rates of PTCA with stenting. It is likely that the demand for CABG will continue to rise steadily, as expansion of angiography occurs, and may be higher than expected from the growth in CA.     

Survival following coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in anatomic subsets in which coronary artery bypass surgery improves survival compared with medical therapy. Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare survival after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in high-risk anatomic subsets. BACKGROUND: Compared with medical therapy, CABG decreases mortality in patients with three-vessel disease and two-vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), particularly if left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is present. How survival after PTCA and CABG compares in these high-risk anatomic subsets is unknown. METHODS: In the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), 1,829 patients with multivessel disease were randomized to an initial strategy of PTCA or CABG between 1988 and 1991. Stents and IIb/IIIa inhibitors were not utilized. Since patients in BARI with diabetes mellitus had greater survival with CABG, separate analyses of patients without diabetes were performed. RESULTS: Seven-year survival among patients with three-vessel disease undergoing PTCA and CABG (n = 754) was 79% versus 84% (p = 0.06), respectively, and 85% versus 87% (p = 0.36) when only non-diabetics (n = 592) were analyzed. In patients with three-vessel disease and reduced LV function (ejection fraction <50%), seven-year survival was 70% versus 74% (p = 0.6) in all PTCA and CABG patients (n = 176), and 82% versus 73% (p = 0.29) among non-diabetic patients (n = 124). Seven-year survival was 87% versus 84% (p = 0.9) in all PTCA and CABG patients (including diabetics) with two-vessel disease involving the proximal LAD (n = 352), and 78% versus 71% (p = 0.7) in patients with two-vessel disease involving the proximal LAD with reduced LV function (n = 72). CONCLUSION: In high-risk anatomic subsets in which survival is prolonged by CABG versus medical therapy, revascularization by PTCA and CABG yielded equivalent survival over seven years.     

Coronary Revascularization and Cardiac Catheterization in the United States: Trends in Racial Differences

Objectives. We sought to determine whether racial differences in rates of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and cardiac catheterization decreased after 1980.

Background. Many reports of racial differences in utilization of CABG have been published since 1982. However, changes in the relative utilization of revascularization over time have received little attention.

Methods. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey were examined for the years 1980 through 1993. Estimated numbers of procedures performed in nonfederal U.S. hospitals were used to compute age-adjusted rates per 100,000 population by year and race for patients 35 to 84 years old.

Results. In patients 35 to 84 years old, the rate of CABG increased in blacks and whites between 1980 and 1993. Between 1986 and 1993, there was little change in the black/white ratio of age-adjusted rates (0.23 in 1980 through 1985 combined, 0.38 in 1986 and 0.43 in 1993). An apparent increase from 0.23 in 1980 through 1985 combined may have been due to sampling variation. Despite rapid increases in rates of PTCA in both races, no increase in the black/white ratio was noted (0.57 in 1993). However, the rate of inpatient cardiac catheterization increased more rapidly in blacks than in whites. This resulted in an increase in the black/white ratio of age-adjusted rates from 0.42 in 1980 to 0.91 in 1993.

Conclusions. Rates of CABG, cardiac catheterization and especially PTCA increased between 1980 and 1993, a period during which racial disparities in the procedures became widely known. Despite apparent increases in the black/white ratio for inpatient cardiac catheterization, large racial disparities in the utilization of CABG and PTCA persist and require further evaluation and possible intervention.

(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1557–62)     

Long-term prognosis of patients with angina treated with enhanced external counterpulsation: five-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD) that has been used successfully in patients not responding to medical and/or surgical therapy. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of EECP on long-term prognosis in such patients. METHODS: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were tracked in 33 patients with CAD treated with EECP. Patients were subgrouped based on whether or not they demonstrated an early improvement in radionuclide stress perfusion imaging (Responders vs. Nonresponders) and followed for MACE over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Patient population characteristics included 73% with multivessel disease; 45% with prior myocardial infarction(s); and 61% who had undergone either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or both. RESULTS: There were 26 of 33 (79%) Responders, and 7 of 33 (21%) Nonresponders. Subsequent MACE over the 5-year follow-up included four deaths and eight patients with cardiovascular events [acute myocardial infarct (4), new CABG or PTCA (6), valve replacement (1), unstable angina (1)]. Nonresponders had significantly (p < 0.01) more MACE (6/7 or 86%) than Responders (6/26 or 23%). Overall, 21 of the 33 (64%) patients remained alive and without MACE and the need for revascularization 5 years post EECP treatment. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, particularly for the majority of patients demonstrating improvement in radionuclide stress perfusion post treatment, EECP may be an effective long-term therapy.     

Racial differences in prevalence of coronary obstructions among men with positive nuclear imaging studies.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to compare coronary obstruction between clinically similar African Americans (AA) and white persons undergoing coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: African Americans have higher rates of coronary death than whites, but are less likely to undergo coronary revascularization. Although differences in coronary anatomy do not explain racial difference in revascularization rates, several studies of clinically diverse persons undergoing coronary angiography have found less obstructive coronary disease in AA than clinically similar whites. METHODS: We studied 52 AA and 259 white male veterans who had both a positive nuclear perfusion imaging study and coronary angiography within 90 days of that study in five Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. We used chart review and patient interview to collect demographics, clinical characteristics, and coronary anatomy results. Before angiography, we asked physicians to estimate the likelihood of coronary obstruction. RESULTS: The treating physicians' estimates of coronary disease likelihood were similar for AA (79.5%) and whites (83.0%); AA were less likely to have any coronary obstruction (63.5% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.05) and had significantly less severe coronary disease (p = 0.01) than whites. African Americans continued to be less likely to have coronary obstruction in analyses controlling for clinical features, including the physician's estimate of the likelihood of coronary obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that AA have less coronary obstruction than apparently clinically similar whites. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and better understand the paradox that AA are less likely to have obstructive coronary disease and more likely to suffer mortality from coronary disease.     

Coronary revascularization after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for unstable angina pectoris: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

To determine the role of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in unstable angina, it was compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial. Forty patients with angina at rest and provocable ischemia (pacing induced) had baseline coronary angiography, study drug infusion and then repeat angiography at 20 +/- 9 hours. All patients received diltiazem, nitrates, beta blockers, aspirin and intravenous heparin. During study drug infusion (150 mg over 8 hours), refractory ischemia necessitating emergency bypass surgery (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) occurred in 4 of 20 t-PA patients compared with 1 of 20 placebo patients (p = 0.21). Before discharge, revascularization for persistent, provocable ischemia and a residual stenosis greater than or equal to 60% was as follows: t-PA patients, 8 PTCA and 7 CABG; placebo patients, 11 PTCA and 8 CABG (p = 0.39). Quantitative angiographic percent diameter stenosis of the culprit artery at baseline and follow-up was: t-PA 71 +/- 17 and 63 +/- 22; placebo 70 +/- 19 and 67 +/- 22 (difference not significant). However, 3 t-PA patients compared with no placebo patients demonstrated an insignificant (less than 60% diameter) residual stenosis and averted PTCA (p = 0.14). There were no complications of PTCA in the 8 t-PA patients; in contrast, 3 of 11 placebo patients had abrupt closure, necessitating emergency CABG in 2 (p = 0.23). Thus, intravenous t-PA in unstable angina can eliminate the need for PTCA in a few patients, does not appear to decrease the overall or emergency rate of revascularization procedures and may facilitate the safety of PTCA.     

Assessment of Repeat Revascularization in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials as a Surrogate for Mortality: A Meta-Regression Analysis

The association of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mortality is uncertain. To assess the association of repeat revascularization after PCI with mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We identified randomized controlled trials comparing PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) using electronic databases through January 1, 2022. We performed a random-effects meta-regression between repeat revascularization rates after PCI (absolute risk difference [%] between PCI and CABG or OMT) with the relative risks (RR) of mortality. We assessed surrogacy of repeat revascularization for mortality using the coefficient of determination (R2), with threshold of 0.80. In 33 trials (21,735 patients), at median follow-up of 4 (2-7) years, repeat revascularization was higher after PCI than CABG [RR: 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.99-3.03)], but lower vs OMT [RR: 0.64 (0.46-0.88)]. Overall, meta-regression showed that repeat revascularization rates after PCI had no significant association with all-cause mortality [RR: 1.01 (0.99-1.02); R2=0.10) or cardiovascular mortality [RR: 1.01 (CI: 0.99-1.03); R2=0.09]. In PCI vs CABG (R2=0.0) or PCI vs OMT trials (R2=0.28), repeat revascularization did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (R2=0.0). We observed concordant results for subgroup analyses (enrollment time, follow-up, sample size, risk of bias, stent types, and coronary artery disease), and multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, risk of bias, MI, and follow-up duration. In summary, this meta-regression did not establish repeat revascularization after PCI as a surrogate for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.