Repeated intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for exudative age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide has been discussed as treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objectives: To give an updated report on repeated intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for the treatment of exudative AMD. METHODS: The case-series study included 24 patients (24 eyes) with progressive exudative AMD who had shown an increase in, or stabilization of, visual acuity after a first IVTA, and who eventually experienced a deterioration of visual acuity. The 24 (6.5%) eyes were selected out of a total group of 369 eyes who had received IVTA for exudative AMD within the last 5 years. All patients of the study received a second IVTA (approximately 20 mg) 3.7-38.5 months after the first injection. Main outcome measure was visual acuity. RESULTS: After the first injection, best corrected visual acuity improved significantly (p = 0.001) from 0.75 +/- 0.34 logMAR to a minimum of 0.58 +/- 0.30 logMAR during follow-up, with 10 (42%) eyes improving in visual acuity by two or more Snellen lines. Towards the end of follow-up after the first injection, best corrected visual acuity decreased significantly (p = 0.03) compared with the baseline value. After the second injection, visual acuity did not change markedly from baseline to a mean maximal visual acuity during follow-up. Comparing the last postoperative examination at the end of the follow-up after the second IVTA with the preoperative examination, a significantly (p = 0.001) higher number of eyes lost in visual acuity [19 (79%) eyes] than gained in visual acuity [3 (12%) eyes]. CONCLUSIONS: In selected eyes with an increase in visual acuity after a first IVTA (20 mg), repeated IVTA temporarily stabilizes visual acuity with a drop in visual acuity towards the end of follow-up.     

Relation between reduction of foveal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal triamcinolone

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness after a single intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHOD: Patients: In a prospective study 24 eyes with diabetic macular edema were treated with an intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected logMAR visual acuity and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline and 3 months after the treatment. RESULTS: At baseline the average foveal thickness was 462 +/- 154 microm (95% confidence interval, 397-527 microm) and at 3 months 257 +/-114 microm (95% confidence interval, 209-305 microm) (P < .0001). The best-corrected logMAR average visual acuity was 60.5 +/- 10.5 (95% confidence interval, 56.0-65.0) ETDRS letters at baseline compared with 65.5 +/- 11.1 (95% confidence interval, 60.8-70.1) 3 months after the injection (P = .0001). There was no correlation between the improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness (r = 0.054, P = .8), but there was a correlation between reduction in foveal thickness and the age of the patients (r = 0.53, P = .008). CONCLUSION: A single injection of 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide effectively reduces the foveal thickness in diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity, but there does not appear to be a strong correlation between the reduction of foveal thickness and the improvement in visual acuity.     

Early treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in the early treatment of severe cystoid macular edema (CME) related to acute branch retinal vein occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, non-comparative case series. Twelve eyes with severe CME (foveal thickness > 450 microm) secondary to acute branch retinal vein occlusion received IVTA. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 15.3 months. Mean visual acuity was 0.88 LogMar units (20/160) initially, 0.55 LogMar units (20/70) at 1 week, 0.46 LogMar units (20/60) at 1 month, and 0.49 LogMar units (20/60) at last follow-up. Visual acuity improved by 3 lines or greater in 42% of patients at 1 week, 50% at 1 month, and 42% at last follow-up. Average foveal thickness was 589 microm (range, 460 to 840 microm) at baseline, 237 microm at 1 week, 196 microm at 1 month, and 235 microm at last follow-up. All eyes showed reduction of foveal thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography. Eight eyes developed recurrent CME at an average of 5.5 months after initial IVTA injection. Ten eyes required additional intervention during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment of severe CME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with IVTA is effective in reducing foveal thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography and improving visual acuity. However, monotherapy with IVTA can be associated with a significant rate of recurrent CME.     

Clinical experience in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with pegaptanib

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy with Pegaptanib was effective in neovascular AMD in the VISION study. We report our experience with Macugen for the treatment of occult or minimally classic choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 35 eyes of 35 patients with occult CNV or minimally classic CNV due to neovascular AMD not eligible for PDT were treated with intravitreal injection of 0.3 mg Pegaptanib. An average of 2.74 injections per patient was administered. Before, and every 3 months after treatment, visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, angiography and OCT examinations were performed. One month after treatment only visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, and OCT examinations were performed. Visual acuity measurements and an eye examination were done on the first and second day after injection, after 4-6 weeks and at months 3 and 6. RESULTS: Intravitreal Pegaptanib was well tolerated and we had no complications. Mean visual acuity was 0.38 +/- 0.23 at baseline, after one month 0.38 +/- 0.26, at 3 months it was 0.39 +/- 0.22 and at 6 months 0.41 +/- 0.26. OCT examinations showed a decrease in central retinal thickness from 277 microm to 254 microm. In 91.4 % of the eyes the visual acuity was stabilised or improved. No patient had an elevated intraocular pressure after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal therapy with Pegaptanib was safe and effective. The majority of patients showed a stabilisation in all the assessed parameters. In clinical practice unselective VEGF inhibition should be considered carefully for patients with high cardiovascular risk profile or thromboembolic events in the history.     

Visual acuity change after intravitreal bevacizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration in relation to subfoveal membrane type

PURPOSE: To examine an association between the subfoveal neovascular membrane type and visual acuity change after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We carried out a clinical, retrospective, interventional case-series study including 66 consecutive patients (67 eyes) with exudative AMD who received an intravitreal injection of 1.5 mg bevacizumab. Study subgroups included the occult type without or with minimally classic subfoveal neovascularization (n = 28 eyes, 42%), predominantly or purely classic subfoveal neovascularization (n = 22 eyes, 33%), and eyes with retinal pigment epithelium detachment (n = 17 eyes, 25%). Follow-up was >or= 2 months. RESULTS: The maximal visual acuity (VA) gain (mean +/- standard deviation - 0.07 +/- 0.30 logMAR, 0.5 +/- 2.9 Snellen lines; p = 0.87), and VA gain at 1 month (p = 0.10), 2 months (p = 0.77) and 3 months (p = 0.35) after the injection did not vary significantly between the three study subgroups. Correspondingly, a multivariate analysis did not reveal a statistically significant (p = 0.57) influence of subfoveal lesion type on gain in VA. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab does not differ markedly between various types of subfoveal neovascularization in AMD.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone for the treatment of ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and foveal ischemia. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients with macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal ischemia. intervention: Four mg IVTA. main outcome measures: Visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography, macular thickness measurements, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of BRVO before treatment was 14 months. All patients were followed for a minimum of nine months, and 12 patients completed 12 months follow-up. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA improved significantly from 0.81 +/- 0.36 at baseline to 0.65 +/- 0.30 at one month (P = .03) but did not vary significantly from baseline at three, six, nine, and 12 months. Macular thickness improved significantly in all eyes from a mean of 400 +/- 134 mum preinjection, to 228 +/- 58 mum at one month (P < .01) and 256 +/- 121 mum at three months (P < .01) but did not vary significantly from baseline at six, nine, and 12 months. Eight eyes developed posterior subcapsular cataract, intraocular pressure (IOP) exceeded 21 mm Hg in four eyes, and two eyes developed vitreomacular traction during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IVTA is effective in reducing ischemic macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal capillary nonperfusion. This reduction is often associated with a temporary improvement in VA. Raised IOP and development of posterior subcapsular cataract are disadvantages of this treatment.     

Intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator to treat macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) injection for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Seventeen eyes presenting with macular edema caused by BRVO were treated with an intravitreal tPA (Monteplase, 40 k IU) injection. We assessed the visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 3.6 +/- 3.8 weeks. The mean logMAR VA significantly improved from 0.603 +/- 0.327 at baseline to 0.388 +/- 0.248 (P < .01) at one month and 0.359 +/- 0.319 (P < .05) at six months. The mean foveal thickness significantly decreased from 738 +/- 156 microm at baseline to 454 +/- 213 microm (P < .001) at one month and 253 +/- 164 microm (P < .001) six months. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal tPA injection may be an effective treatment for resolving macular edema and improving the VA in BRVO.     

Follow-up after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report on the follow-up of patients who received an intravitreal high-dosage injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: The clinical interventional case-series study included 109 eyes (90 patients) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who consecutively received an IVTA of about 20 mg. Mean follow-up was 11.2 +/- 6.2 months. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.89 +/- 0.33 logMAR to a best minimum of 0.65 +/- 0.35 logMAR. An increase in best visual acuity by at least 1 Snellen line, 2 lines, and 3 lines was found in 91 (83%) eyes, 68 (62%) eyes, and 45 (41%) eyes, respectively. Differences in visual acuity between baseline and follow-up examinations were significant for measurements performed at 1 month (p<0.001), 2 months (p<0.001), 3 months (p<0.001), and at 6 months (p=0.001) after the injection. At 9 months after the injection, mean visual acuity regressed significantly so that visual acuity at 9 months (p=0.83) and at 12 months after the injection (p=0.58) compared with baseline values did not differ significantly. Forty-seven (43%) eyes developed a rise in intraocular pressure (pressure >21 mmHg) for 6 to 8 months after the injection. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of a visual acuity increase and intraocular pressure rise after high-dosage IVTA in diffuse diabetic macular edema is about 6 to 8 months. Compared with data in the literature, the high-dosage IVTA may not have a markedly higher profile of side effects than low-dosage IVTA.     

Follow-up after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for exudative age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To report on the follow-up of patients who received an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (IVTA) as treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: The clinical interventional case-series study included 205 patients (222 eyes) with progressive exudative age-related macular degeneration with subfoveal neovascularization who consecutively received an IVTA of about 20 mg as only therapeutic procedure and for whom follow-up was at least 3 months. Mean follow-up was 10.4+/-7.1 months (range, 3-35.7 months). RESULTS: Visual acuity improved significantly (P<0.001) from baseline (0.90+/-0.45 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMar)) to a mean minimum of 0.79+/-0.42 LogMar during follow-up. In 86 (38.7%) eyes and in 55 (24.8%) eyes, best visual acuity increased by at least two and three Snellen lines, respectively. Comparing the measurements at specific postinjection examination dates showed that visual acuity measurements taken at 1, 2, and 3 months after injection were not significantly different from the baseline value. Measurements taken at 6, 9, and 12 months after the injection were significantly (P<0.001) lower than the measurements at baseline. Mean loss at 6 months was 1.4+/-3.8 Snellen lines, at 9 months, 2.5+/-4.6 lines, and at 12 months after the injection, 2.6+/-4.0 lines. Intraocular pressure increased significantly (P<0.001) during the first 6 months, and returned to baseline at 9 months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Single injection high-dosage IVTA did not show an apparent benefit at 12 months after injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.     

Pars plana vitrectomy and removal of the internal limiting membrane in diabetic macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in diabetic patients with macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, 20 eyes of 10 patients with diabetic macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation were evaluated. PPV with ILM removal was performed randomly in one eye each of 10 patients and taken as the study group; the untreated fellow eyes were taken as the control group. Main outcome measures were foveal thickness changes measured with optical coherence tomography and preoperative and post-operative visual acuity. Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and chi-square tests were used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.5+/-6 years (range 51 to 71). All patients were followed up for 12 months. In the study group, mean foveal thickness was 391.3+/-91.6 microm preoperatively and 225.5+/-49.4 microm postoperatively (p=0.009). In the control group, mean foveal thickness was 356.2+/-140 microm at baseline and 318.4+/-111.1 microm at 12-month follow-up (p=0.138). Mean decrease in foveal thickness was 165.8+/-114.8 microm in the study group and 37.8+/-71.2 microm in the control group (p=0.016). In the study group, best-corrected log-MAR visual acuity was 0.71+/-0.43 preoperatively and 0.54+/-0.45 postoperatively (p=0.125). In the control group, best-corrected logMAR visual acuity was 0.43+/-0.44 at baseline and 0.59+/-0.55 at 12-month follow-up (p=0.235). In the study group, visual acuity improved by two or more lines in 4 eyes (40%) and remained stable in 6 eyes (60%). In the control group, visual acuity improved by two or more lines in 1 eye (10%) and decreased by two or more lines in 3 eyes (30%). CONCLUSIONS: PPV with ILM removal appears to be an effective procedure for reducing diabetic macular edema unresponsive to grid laser photocoagulation. A further study with a large number of patients is required to assess the effectiveness and safety of this procedure.     

Tomographic assessment of vitreous surgery for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the retinal structure before and after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema and to assess the correlation between thickness of neurosensory retina and best-corrected visual acuity. METHODS: Tomographic features of 13 eyes (nine patients) with diabetic macular edema were prospectively evaluated with optical coherence tomography before and after vitrectomy. The foveal thickness (the distance between the inner retinal surface and the retinal pigment epithelium) and the retinal thickness (thickness of neurosensory retina) were measured by optical coherence tomography preoperatively and postoperatively. The correlation of the best-corrected visual acuity with foveal and retinal thickness was determined. RESULTS: All 13 eyes had retinal swelling with low intraretinal reflectivity. In addition to retinal swelling, there were cystoid spaces in five (38%) of 13 eyes, a serous retinal detachment in three (23%), and both cystoid spaces and serous detachment in three (23%). Six months postoperatively, the mean foveal thickness significantly decreased from 630 +/- 170 to 350 +/- 120 microm (P <.01, paired t test) and the mean thickness of neurosensory retina decreased from 540 +/- 160 to 320 +/- 140 microm (P <.01, paired t test). A serous retinal detachment occurred transiently in 3 eyes. Compared with the preoperative level, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity level improved by more than 2 lines in five of the 13 eyes (38%), remained the same in seven eyes (54%), and decreased in one eye (8%). The postoperative thickness of neurosensory retina at the fovea and best-corrected visual acuity level at the sixth postoperative month had a strong negative correlation (correlation coefficient, -0.76; P <.01, Spearmans rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy was generally effective in treatment of diabetic macular edema. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated the intraretinal changes of macular edema and the process of edema absorption. During the process of macular edema absorption, intraretinal fluid appeared to move into the subretinal space in some cases. Best-corrected visual acuity improvement was greater in eyes with less preoperative increase in thickness of neurosensory retina.     

老年黄斑变性合并白内障患者行超声乳化术疗效分析

目的 探讨老年黄斑变性合并白内障患者行超声乳化手术联合人工晶状体植入的临床效果及安全性、可行性.方法 对40例52只眼老年黄斑变性合并白内障患者,行超声乳化联合人丁晶状体植入术,其中干性老年黄斑变性者45只眼,湿性老年黄斑变性者7只眼.收集其资料进行回顾性分析,观察患者术后视力改善情况及有无并发症发生.结果 术后3月时,90.38%患者视力不同程度提高,视力无明显提高甚至下降者5只眼,均为湿性黄斑变性患者.最佳矫正视力0.3-0.6者12只眼(其中达0.6者8只眼),0.1-0.3者35只眼,<0.1者5只眼.4例术中后囊破裂,3例术后角膜雾状水肿.术后1年,7只眼湿性黄斑变性均有不同程度的加重,干性黄斑变性患者未发现眼底新生血管之类改变.结论 超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术可明显提高老年黄斑变性合并白内障患者术后视力,但对于湿性黄斑变性患者手术应慎重.     

Macular function by multifocal electroretinogram in diabetic macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess macular function by multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection. METHODS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with DME scheduled for 4 mg IVTA injection were prospectively recruited. The response to treatment was monitored functionally by visual acuity (VA) measurement and mfERG and anatomically by foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first-order kernel P1 mfERG responses from 0 to 7 degrees (central) and 7 to 25 degrees (peripheral) were grouped and analyzed. Changes in functional parameters (VAs and the P1 mfERG response amplitudes and peak latencies) and morphometric parameters (OCT foveal thickness) in eyes with DME 1 and 3 months after IVTA injection were compared with baseline values by Student t test. RESULTS: The mean baseline logMAR value for VAs of the patients before treatment was 0.49+/-0.26. After treatment, it was 0.27+/-0.23 at 1 month and 0.26+/-0.18 at 3 months, and differences from pretreatment values were significant (for each, p<0.001). There were statistically significant decreases in the mean foveal thickness at 1 and 3 months after treatment compared with pretreatment values (for each, p<0.001). There were also statistically significant increases in the mean P1 response amplitude for both central and peripheral groups at all examinations compared with pretreatment (for each, p<0.001). The mean P1 peak latencies for both the central and peripheral groups were shortened, but not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: As well as the reduction in DME and improvement in VA, IVTA injection improves macular function as assessed by mfERG in diabetic patients.     

Treatment of central retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin): preliminary results

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with intravitreal bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The ongoing prospective study included 8 consecutive patients (8 eyes) with macular edema secondary to CRVO (6 non ischemic and 2 ischemic), treated with intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg (0.05 mL) of bevacizumab. Main outcome was best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by optical coherence tomography monthly during one year. Retreatment criteria include decrease of BCVA, persistence of macular edema on angiograms and increase of CFT. RESULTS: Mean age of the eight patients was 68 years (range: 50-82 years). Mean duration of symptoms before injection was 98 days (range: 3-289). Mean follow-up was 3.25 months. At baseline, mean BCVA was 0.84 logMar and mean baseline CFT was 771 microm. Mean BCVA was 0.36 and mean CFT thickness was 275 microm (n = 8) at month 1, 0.41 and 411 microm at month 2 (n = 7), 0.3 and 344 microm at month 3 (n = 6), 0.3 and 397 microm at month 4 (n = 5), respectively. In 75 % of patients, a single injection was not sufficient, and retreatment needed. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of macular edema secondary to CRVO with intravitreal bevacizumab injection of 1.25 mg was well tolerated and associated with marked macular thickness reduction and BCVA improvement in all patients. A trend towards reduction of foveal thickness and improvement of visual acuity was observed in both acute and chronic CRVO.     

Visual acuity change after intravitreal triamcinolone in various types of exudative age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual acuity change after an intravitreal high-dose injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in various types of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PARTICIPANTS: The interventional comparative case series study included 142 patients (146 eyes) with progressive exudative AMD differentiated into the occult type (n = 78; 53.4%), minimal classic type (n = 45; 30.8%), predominantly classic type (n = 17; 11.6%), and the purely classic type (n = 6; 4.1%). Mean follow-up was 9.7 +/- 7.0 months (3-35.7 months). METHODS: Single intravitreal injection of approximately 20 mg of TA. Outcome measures: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: Gain in visual acuity measured at 1 month (P = 0.20), 2 months (P = 0.43), and at 3 months (P = 0.38) after the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone and maximal gain in visual acuity during the whole follow-up (P = 0.81) did not vary significantly between the 4 study groups. Correspondingly, the size of a retinal pigment epithelium detachment was not significantly associated with the change in visual acuity at 1 month (P = 0.62), 2 months (P = 0.24), 3 months (P = 0.96), or the maximal gain in visual acuity during follow-up (P = 0.93). The amount of rise in IOP, compared with the baseline value (6.5 +/- 7.4 mmHg), was statistically not associated with the type of subfoveal membrane (P = 0.20; 95% confidence interval: -0.52, 2.45). CONCLUSIONS: The change in visual acuity and the rise in IOP in patients with exudative AMD receiving an intravitreal triamcinolone monotherapy is statistically independent of the type of subfoveal membrane, including the size of a retinal epithelium detachment.     

Intereye difference in exudative age-related macular degeneration with minimally classic or occult subfoveal neovascularization after unilateral intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To report on visual outcome after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for exudative age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Interventional comparative non-randomized clinical trial. METHODS: SETTING: Institutional. PATIENTS: Twenty consecutive patients with bilateral exudative age-related macular degeneration with minimally classic or occult subfoveal neovascularisation. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral intravitreal injection of about 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide into the eye (study group) more severely affected or showing more pronounced progression of the disease. Mean follow-up was 13.5 +/- 4.1 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity increased significantly (P < 0.001) from 0.96 +/- 0.32 logMar to a mean maximum of 0.76 +/- 0.30 logMar during follow-up. An increase in best visual acuity during follow-up was found in 18 (90%) eyes. In 11 (55%) eyes and 7 (35%) eyes, respectively, best visual acuity increased by at least two Snellen lines and three Snellen lines, respectively. In the control group, visual acuity at baseline and the highest visual acuity measurements during follow-up did not vary significantly (P = 0.90). Comparing study group and control group, visual acuity gain was significantly (P = 0.003) higher in the study group. Correspondingly, the number of eyes with an increase in visual acuity (P = 0.002) and with an increase in visual acuity higher > or = 3 lines compared to a loss of > or = 3 lines was significantly (P = 0.027) higher in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may temporarily increase visual acuity in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration.     

Arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO were randomized into two treatment groups. A total of 20 patients received AV sheathotomy (sheathotomy group), and the second group of 20 patients was treated with IVTA (IVTA group). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) score, total macular volume measured, and foveal thickness by 3rd generation optical coherence tomography (OCT3) were evaluated as main outcome measurements. RESULTS: The average changes in ETDRS scores, total macular volumes, and foveal thicknesses compared to baseline values, were significant 3 months and 6 months after treatment in both groups (P < 0.05, paired t-test), but only the IVTA group showed significant improvements 1 month after treatment. The between-group differences in average ETDRS score, total macular volume, and foveal thickness changes were significantly better at 1 month after treatment in the ITVA group (P = 0.026, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively, Student's t-test), at which time IVTA patients had better vision and anatomical outcomes than did those in the sheathotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: After either AV sheathotomy or IVTA treatment, patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO showed similar functional and anatomical outcomes 6 months later. When the cost and the risks of vitreoretinal surgery are considered, IVTA treatment may be a better treatment option, as the drug yields better short-term outcomes.     

Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: the role of posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy on eyes with diabetic macular edema in the presence or absence of a complete posterior vitreous detachment and with or without an epimacular membrane. METHODS: Pars plana vitrectomy was performed on 30 eyes of 29 cases with diabetic macular edema. Visual acuity was measured, and retinal thickness was determined by optical coherence tomography before and after vitrectomy. To evaluate the relationship between the effects of vitrectomy and the presence or absence of posterior vitreous detachment and/or epimacular membrane, all eyes were placed into one of four groups: group A, eyes with posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane; B, eyes with posterior vitreous detachment and without epimacular membrane; C, eyes without posterior vitreous detachment and with epimacular membrane; and D, eyes without posterior vitreous detachment and without epimacular membrane. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 was investigated immunohistochemically in epimacular membrane specimens obtained from seven eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema. RESULTS: The postoperative mean visual acuity (0.653 +/- 0.350: mean +/- SD logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) was significantly better than the mean preoperative visual acuity (0.891 +/- 0.319 logMAR; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P =.0007). The postoperative foveal thickness (264.5 +/- 118.6 microm) was significantly thinner than the preoperative foveal thickness (477.8 +/- 147.7 microm; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P <.0001). There were no significant differences in the improvement of visual acuity and decrease of foveal thickness between the four groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P =.13, P =.65, respectively). All of the epimacular membranes obtained at surgery expressed vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that vitrectomy with removal of epimacular membrane is generally an effective procedure in reducing diabetic macular edema, and the outcome does not depend on the presence absence of posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane.     

Quantitative assessment of retinal thickness in diabetic patients with and without clinically significant macular edema using optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE: To assess patients with diabetic macular edema quantitatively using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: OCT was performed in 14 eyes with diabetic retinopathy and ophthalmoscopic evidence of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and in 19 diabetic eyes without CSME. Retinal thickness was computed from the tomograms at fovea and other 36 locations throughout the macula. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation foveal thickness was 255.6 +/- 138.9 microm in eyes with CSME, and 174.6 +/- 38.2 microm in eyes without CSME (p = 0.051). Within 2000 microm of the center of the macula, eyes with CSME had significantly thicker retina in the inferior quadrant than those without CSME (p < 0.01). The foveal thickness was correlated with logMAR visual acuity (gamma = 0.68, p < 0.01). OCT identified sponge-like retinal swelling and/or cystoid macular edema in 11 (58%) eyes without CSME, and in 12 (86%) eyes with CSME. CONCLUSIONS: Criteria of CSME seem to be insufficient in really identifying macular edema. OCT may be more sensitive than a clinical examination in assessing diabetic macular edema and is a quantitative tool for documenting changes in macular thickening.     

Modified grid laser photocoagulation versus pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) with modified grid laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Randomized, comparative, interventional study. METHODS: In this prospective study, 24 eyes of 12 patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema were evaluated. PPV with removal of the ILM was performed at random in one eye of 12 patients (ILM group), and a single session of modified grid laser photocoagulation was performed in the fellow eyes (grid group). Main outcome measures were the foveal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, preoperative, and postoperative visual acuities. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used in statistical analysis. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 6 months. In the ILM group, mean foveal thickness was 439.2 +/- 106.5 microm preoperatively and 219.8 +/- 63.2 mum postoperatively (P = .002). In the grid group, mean foveal thickness was 407 +/- 100.2 microm preoperatively and 378.5 +/- 141.6 microm postoperatively (P = .433). A mean decrease in foveal thickness was found to be 219.4 +/- 127.6 microm in the ILM group and 28.5 +/- 90.5 microm in the grid group (P = .001). In the ILM group, best-corrected logMAR visual acuity was 0.75 +/- 0.41 preoperatively and 0.53 +/- 0.41 postoperatively (P = .006). In the grid group, best-corrected logMAR visual acuity was 0.59 +/- 0.27 preoperatively and 0.49 +/- 0.27 postoperatively (P = .058). Visual acuity improved by 2 or more lines in six eyes (50%) in the ILM group and in three eyes (25%) in the grid group. Visual acuity remained stable in six eyes (50%) in the ILM group and in nine eyes (75%) in the grid group. CONCLUSIONS: PPV with ILM removal appears to be more effective than a single session of modified grid laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Further studies with a large number of patients are required for a more reliable conclusion.