The prophylactic efficacy of rifampicin-soaked graft in combination with systemic vancomycin in the prevention of prosthetic vascular graft infection: an experimental study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prophylactic efficacy of systemic, topical, or combined antibiotic usage in the prevention of late prosthetic vascular graft infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and the differential adherence of S. epidermidis to Dacron and ePTFE grafts in a rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of 120 adult male Wistar rats by implantation of 1-cm(2) Dacron/ePTFE prosthesis followed by topical inoculation with 2 x 10(7) CFU of clinical isolate of MRSE. Each of the series included one group with no graft contamination and no antibiotic prophylaxis (uncontaminated control), one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis (untreated control), one contaminated group in which perioperative intraperitoneal prophylaxis with vancomycin (10 mg/kg) was administered, two contaminated groups that received rifampicin-soaked (5 mg/1 ml) or vancomycin-soaked (1 mg/1 ml) grafts, and one contaminated group that received a combination of rifampicin-soaked (5 mg/1 ml) graft with perioperative intraperitoneal vancomycin prophylaxis (10 mg/kg). The grafts were removed sterilely 7 days after implantation and evaluated by using sonication and quantitative blood agar culture. RESULTS: MRSE had significantly greater adherence to Dacron than ePTFE grafts in the untreated contaminated groups (P < 0.001). Rifampicin had better efficacy than vancomycin in topical application, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Intraperitoneal vancomycin showed a significantly higher efficacy than topical vancomycin or rifampicin (P < 0.001). The best results were provided by a combination of intraperitoneal vancomycin in rifampicin-soaked graft groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of rifampicin and intraperitoneal vancomycin seems to be the best choice for the prophylaxis of late prosthetic vascular graft infections caused by MRSE.     

Efficacy of Rifampin-Levofloxacin as a Prophylactic Agent in Preventing Staphylococcus epidermidis Graft Infection

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of levofloxacin in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection in a rat model. METHODS: Graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissue of 225 male Wistar rats by implantation of Dacron prostheses followed by topical inoculation with methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. The study included a group without contamination, two contaminated groups without prophylaxis, two contaminated groups with intraperitoneal levofloxacin prophylaxis, two contaminated groups with intraperitoneal cefazolin prophylaxis, two contaminated groups with intraperitoneal teicoplanin prophylaxis and six contaminated groups with rifampin-soaked graft and intraperitoneal levofloxacin, cefazolin or teicoplanin prophylaxis. The grafts were removed after 7 days and evaluated by quantitative culture. RESULTS: The efficacy of levofloxacin against the methicillin-susceptible strain was not different to that of cefazolin or teicoplanin. Levofloxacin showed slight less efficacy than teicoplanin against the methicillin-resistant strain. The combination levofloxacin-rifampin demonstrated to be similarly effective to the combination rifampin-teicoplanin and more effective than the combination rifampin-cefazolin against both strains. CONCLUSIONS: Rifampin-levofloxacin combination seems useful for the prevention of late-appearing vascular graft infections caused by S. epidermidis.     

Temporin A as a prophylactic agent against methicillin sodium-susceptible and methicillin sodium-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infection

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of temporin A as a prophylactic agent in a rat model of vascular graft infection from methicillin sodium-susceptible and methicillin sodium-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. METHODS: The prospective, randomized, controlled animal study set in a research laboratory in a university hospital used 280 adult male Wistar rats (weight range, 280 to 350 g). Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of rats with implantation of 1-cm(2) sterile Dacron grafts followed by topical inoculation with 2 x 10(7) colony-forming units of S epidermidis. The study for each staphylococcal strain included: one control group (no graft contamination), one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, one contaminated group that received temporin A-soaked graft, two contaminated groups that received perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin (30 mg/kg) or vancomycin hydrochloride prophylaxis (10 mg/kg), and two contaminated groups that received temporin A-soaked graft and perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin (30 mg/kg) or vancomycin hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) prophylaxis. All grafts were explanted at 7 days after implantation. The main outcome measure was quantification of bacterial contamination. RESULTS: Overall, the perioperative prophylaxis based on soaked grafts was not significantly different to that of parenteral vancomycin hydrochloride. Only the combination between temporin A and vancomycin hydrochloride produced a complete bacterial inhibition for both strains. CONCLUSION: Temporin A showed a similar antibacterial in vitro activity against the two different strains. The in vivo results suggest its potential use in providing prophylaxis to direct graft contamination when used in combination with parenteral vancomycin hydrochloride.     

Prophylaxis against Staphylococcus aureus vascular graft infection with mupirocin-soaked, collagen-sealed dacron

A rat model was used to investigate the efficacy of mupirocin in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infections. The effect of mupirocin-soaked Dacron was compared with the effect of rifampin-soaked, collagen-sealed Dacron in the rat model of graft infection caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of 195 adult male Wistar rats by implantation of 1-cm(2) Dacron prostheses followed by topical inoculation with 5 x 10(7) colony-forming units of S. aureus. The study included a control group (no graft contamination), two contaminated groups that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two contaminated groups in which perioperative intraperitoneal amoxicillin clavulanate prophylaxis (50 mg/kg) was administered, four contaminated groups that received mupirocin- or rifampin-soaked graft, and four contaminated groups that received mupirocin- or rifampin-soaked graft and perioperative intraperitoneal amoxicillin clavulanate prophylaxis (50 mg/kg). The grafts were sterilely removed 7 days after implantation and the infection was evaluated by using sonication and quantitative agar culture. Data analysis showed that the efficacy of mupirocin against both strains was significantly different from that of the untreated control. In addition, mupirocin was more effective than rifampin against the methicillin-resistant strain. Finally, only the combination of mupirocin and amoxicillin clavulanate produced complete suppression of growth of all strains.     

RNAIII-inhibiting Peptide and/or Nisin Inhibit Experimental Vascular Graft Infection with Methicillin-susceptible and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of RNAIII-inhibiting peptide (RIP) and nisin as prophylactic agents in a rat model of vascular graft infection. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study. MATERIALS: Two hundred and twenty adult male Wistar rats. Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 and one clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis. Drugs: RIP, nisin and rifampin. METHODS: Graft infections were established in the dorsal subcutaneous tissue by implantation of 1 cm(2) sterile Dacron grafts, followed by topical bacterial inoculation: grafts were retrieved at 7 days. The study included a control group (without inoculation) and two series composed of five groups for each staphylococcal strain: one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, three contaminated groups that received grafts soaked with 10 mg/l RIP, 10 mg/l nisin, 10 mg/l rifampin, or RIP+nisin. The main outcome measure was the extent of bacterial at graft harvest. RESULTS: The bacterial counts for methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis on explanted grafts were 6.1+/-2.8x10(2), 7.8+/-3.0x10(3) and 5.5+/-2.9x10(4) for RIP, nisin and rifampin, respectively. RIP and nisin used in combination reduced the bacterial count to <10. The results for S. epidermidis were similar. CONCLUSIONS: RIP and nisin could be used in combination to coat medical devices to prevent drug resistant S. epidermidis infections.     

Linezolid alone and in combination with rifampicin prevents experimental vascular graft infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis

BACKGROUND: In this report we describe the in vivo antibacterial activity of linezolid in an experimental graft infection model in rats and compare it with teicoplanin. The objective of this study was also to determine the effects of the interaction of linezolid when it was combined with rifampicin and test this effect against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissue of 130 Wistar rats by implantation of Dacron grafts followed by a topical inoculation with 2 x 10(7) CFU of clinical isolates of MRSA and MRSE. The study included a control group and six groups for each of the staphylococcal strains: an inoculated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two inoculated groups that received intraperitoneal prophylaxis with teicoplanin or linezolid alone, an inoculated group that received rifampicin-soaked grafts, and two inoculated groups that received a combination prophylaxis consisting of intraperitoneal teicoplanin or linezolid and rifampicin-soaked grafts. RESULTS: There was a reduction in the quantitative bacterial graft cultures in all prophylaxis groups when compared with inoculated control groups. There was not a statistically significant difference between linezolid and teicoplanin prophylaxis groups. The best results were obtained by a combination of rifampicin-soaked grafts with linezolid or teicoplanin. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to suggest that linezolid differs from teicoplanin regarding effectiveness in the prevention of prosthetic vascular graft infection. Linezolid plus rifampicin and teicoplanin plus rifampicin are demonstrated to be valuable prophylactic regimens.     

Daptomycin and Rifampin Alone and in Combination Prevent Vascular Graft Biofilm Formation and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in a Subcutaneous Rat Pouch Model of Staphylococcal Infection

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of daptomycin and rifampin either alone or in combination in preventing prosthesis biofilm in a rat model of staphylococcal vascular graft infection.DesignProspective, randomised, controlled animal study.MaterialsGraft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of adult male Wistar rats by implantation of Dacron prostheses followed by topical inoculation with 2 × 10⁷ colony forming units of Staphylococcus aureus, strain Smith diffuse.MethodsThe study included a control group, a contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis and three contaminated groups that received intra-peritoneal daptomycin, rifampin-soaked graft and daptomycin plus rifampin-soaked graft, respectively. Each group included 15 animals. The infection burden was evaluated by using sonication and quantitative agar culture. Moreover, an in vitro antibiotic susceptibility assay for S. aureus biofilms was performed to elucidate the same activity.ResultsWhen tested alone, daptomycin and rifampin showed good efficacies. Their combination showed efficacies significantly higher than that of each single compound. The in vitro studies showed that Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration values for daptomycin were lower in presence of rifampin. Daptomycin prevented the emergence of rifampin resistance.ConclusionDaptomycin is an important candidate for prevention of staphylococcal biofilm-related infection and rifampin could serve as an interesting anti-staphylococcal antibiotic enhancer.     

Efficacy of vancomycin, teicoplanin and fusidic acid as prophylactic agents in prevention of vascular graft infection: an experimental study in rat.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of intra-peritoneal vancomycin and teicoplanin with anti-biotic treated Dacron grafts (vancomycin, teicoplanin, 10 or 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts) in preventing vascular graft infections in a rat model. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissues of 80 female Sprague-Dawley rats by the implantation of Dacron prostheses followed by the topical inoculation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The study groups were as follows: (1) uncontaminated control group, (2) untreated contaminated group, (3) contaminated group with intra-peritoneal vancomycin, (4) contaminated group with intra-peritoneal teicoplanin, (5) contaminated group received vancomycin-soaked Dacron graft, (6) contaminated group received teicoplanin-soaked Dacron graft, (7) contaminated group received 40% fusidic acid-soaked Dacron graft, and (8) contaminated group received 10% fusidic acid-soaked Dacron graft prophylaxis. The grafts were removed after 7 days and evaluated by a quantitative culture analysis. RESULTS: No infection was detected in controls. The untreated contaminated group had a high bacteria count (6.0 x 10(4) CFU/cm2 Dacron graft). Groups that received intra-peritoneal vancomycin or teicoplanin had less bacterial growth (4.8 x 10(3) and 3.9 x 10(3)CFU/cm2 Dacron graft, respectively). Similarly, the group that received 10% fusidic acid-soaked graft showed less bacterial growth (3.6 x 10(3) CFU/cm2 Dacron graft). The groups with vancomycin-, teicoplanin- and 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts showed no evidence of infection. Statistical analyses demonstrated that intra-peritoneal prophylactic antibiotic treatment was less effective in inhibiting bacterial growth than high concentration antimicrobial-soaking of grafts. CONCLUSION: The use of vancomycin-, teicoplanin- and 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts was effective in preventing primary prosthetic vascular graft infection.     

Comparative efficacy of topical versus systemic teicoplanin in experimental model of wound infections

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections are the second most common cause of nosocomial infections and, typically, gram-positive pathogens are involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse model was used to investigate the efficacy of different methods for the treatment of wound infections. A full thickness wound was established on the back subcutaneous tissue of adult male BALB/c mice. A small gauze was placed over each wound and then inoculated with 5 x 10(7) colony-forming units of Staphylococcus aureus. The study included a control group that did not receive any treatment and four contaminated groups treated, respectively, with: (1) drug-free Allevyn (Smith and Nephew Healthcare, Yorkshire, United Kingdom), (2) teicoplanin-soaked Allevyn, (3) drug-free Allevyn and daily intraperitoneal teicoplanin (7 mg/kg) and, finally, (4) teicoplanin-soaked Allevyn and daily intraperitoneal teicoplanin (7 mg/kg). Main outcome measures were quantitative bacterial culture, assessment of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plasma levels, histological examination with assessment of microvessel density, and of VEGF expression in tissue sections. RESULTS: Data analysis showed that strong inhibition of bacterial growth was achieved in any group treated with intraperitoneal teicoplanin. However, the highest inhibition of bacterial growth was obtained in the group that received teicoplanin-soaked Allevyn and intraperitoneal teicoplanin. Histological examination showed that each treatment modality was able to reduce the delay in wound repair. The most effective treatment appeared to be the local application of teicoplanin-soaked hydro gel foam. The tissue effects were associated with an increase in neovascularization and VEGF expression by endothelial cells and fibroblasts in the granulation tissue. Bacterial colonies also were reduced, especially when teicoplanin was given parenterally. CONCLUSIONS: Soaking a hydro cellular foam with an antistaphylococcal agents, such as teicoplanin, may be useful for the management of infected wounds.     

Infection prophylaxis in pulmonary surgery: a randomized prospective study

A prospective randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative infections was carried out on 120 patients undergoing pulmonary operations. The patients were randomized into two groups of 60 patients each. One group received doxycycline (deoxytetracycline) prophylaxis for five days, and the other received cefuroxime (a second-generation cephalosporin) for one day. The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, common risk factors, diagnosis, and operative procedures. A reduction in the infection rate was noted in the cefuroxime group (10/60) compared with the doxycycline group (19/60), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). In major infections (empyema and pneumonia) there was no difference between the groups (4/60 in the cefuroxime group and 5/60 in the doxycycline group), but a significant (p less than 0.05) reduction was noted in minor infections (6/56 and 14/55, respectively) such as lower respiratory tract infections and prolonged fever. There were no wound infections in the two study groups. There were significantly (p less than 0.05) fewer postoperative fever reactions (axillary temperature greater than 37.5 degrees C) in the cefuroxime group (30/60) compared with the doxycycline group (44/60). Both antibiotics were effective in preventing wound infections, but cefuroxime may also be beneficial in preventing minor respiratory infections. The bactericidal effect of cefuroxime may explain this finding.     

Vascular prosthetic infection with Staphylococcus epidermidis: experimental study of pathogenesis and therapy

To determine whether a slime-producing strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis was capable of producing acute infection of a prosthetic vascular graft, 5 cm segments of knitted Dacron were implanted in the infrarenal aortic position of dogs in three groups of animals. These included a control group (no graft contamination), a contaminated group that received a graft soaked in an S. epidermidis solution (untreated group), and a contaminated group in which perioperative antibiotics (three doses of cefamandole, 100 mg/kg) were administered (prophylaxis group). In all the animals reexploration and graft removal were performed at 10 days, with replacement of the defect being achieved with a new uncontaminated graft. These animals underwent exploration a third time after an additional 10-day period. S. epidermidis was not grown from the control animals (n = 7) but was cultured in 44% of the prophylaxis group (n = 9) and 88% of the untreated group (n = 16) during at least one of the operative procedures (chi 2 = 15.859; p less than 0.001). The pathologic features of acute S. epidermidis infection were best seen in the untreated animals and included anastomotic disruption (56%), periaortic hematoma, and lymphadenopathy (94%). Microscopic examination of the aortic tissues revealed extensive infiltrates of leukocytes, macrophages, and foreign body giant cells with aortic necrosis. These features were less prominent in the prophylaxis animals. We conclude that S. epidermidis is capable of producing acute graft infection with perigraft inflammation and anastomotic disruption. The administration of perioperative antibiotics reduced but did not abolish these effects of bacterial contamination of prosthetic vascular grafts.     

Short-term systemic prophylaxis with cefoxitin and doxycycline in colorectal surgery: A prospective,randomized study

The efficacy of cefoxitin or doxycycline as antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery was compared in 102 elective operations. Both drugs were used perioperatively only. Cefoxitin was used in 55 cases and doxycycline in 47. Ten patients in the cefoxitin group and 4 in the doxycycline group had wound infections. Three intraabdominal abscesses were seen, one after cefoxitin and two after doxycycline prophylaxis. All three were due to anastomotic leakage. Bacteriologic studies revealed no negative ecologic effects of prophylaxis. The short-term prophylaxis used did protect against serious infectious complications. The extended spectrum of cefoxitin provided no added benefit in prophylaxis. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated preoperatively with salicylazosulfapyridine run a greater risk of postoperative infection in spite of the prophylaxis.     

"Switch prophylaxis one a day" with levofloxacin in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Special attention is paid today to the advisability of carrying out routine antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and to the dosage protocol to be adopted in order to reduce the incidence of infections at the site of the surgical operation which, albeit with lower incidence than in "open" surgery, 5.3% vs 14%, can vanify the advantages of the mini-invasive approach. The demonstrated validity of administering the antibiotic beyond 24 hours after the operation led the authors to verify the clinical effectiveness and tolerance of "switch prophylaxis one a day" (SPOD) with levofloxacin in the prevention of septic complications after LC. METHODS: The experience reported relates to 185 patients suffering from symptomatic and/or complicated lithiasis of the gall-bladder subjected from January 1999 to April 2001 to LC and to antibiotic prophylaxis in accordance with the following dosage protocol: levofloxacin 500 mg i.v. 30 min before operation and 500 mg per os in the 3 days subsequent. RESULTS: The postsurgical evaluation documented the onset of 2 superficial infections in patients in whom LC had been of necessity converted and of a subhepatic abscess in an ASA III patient with acute cholecystitis. Prevention of infections at the surgical site totalled 98.4%. Nausea and slight diarrhoea and an increase in transaminasaemia were observed respectively in 3% and 4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained led the authors to standardise the use of SPOD with levofloxacin in LC operations which, in their opinion represents a rational alternative to the antibiotic prophylaxis regimes most commonly used up to the present (STP and USTP).     

Prospective, randomized, multicentric, open, comparative study on the efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin versus 1920 mg trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus a control group in patients undergoing TUR of the prostate

OBJECTIVES: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is one of the most frequent urological procedures. The efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of levofloxacin vs. trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) vs. a control group, receiving no antibiotic prophylaxis, in patients undergoing TUR-P was investigated in a multicentre study. The aims were to assess the rate of bacteriuria (cfu> or =10(4)/ml) 5 to 7 days, and 3 to 5 weeks after TUR-P, as well as postoperative complications. METHODS: The study was prospective, randomized, multicentric, open and comparative. Patients without bacteriuria (cfu<10(4)/ml) scheduled for TUR-P and not having received antibiotics prior within four days were enclosed. Patients received an oral single dose prophylaxis with either 500 mg levofloxacin, or 320/1600 mg TMP/SMZ, or no prophylaxis according to a 2:2:1 randomization. Clinical examination of the patients and urine culture were performed prior to, 5 to 7 days and 3 to 5 weeks after TUR-P. RESULTS: 14 urological centres throughout Germany recruited 400 patients. 376 patients were evaluable until day 5 to 7, 339 until week 3 to 5. Overall bacteriuria rate at day 5 to 7 was 22% (levofloxacin 21%; TMP/SMZ 20%; control group 30%). Bacteriuria rate at week 3 to 5 was 28% (levofloxacin 26%; TMP/SMZ 26%; control group 36%). Complication rate at week 3 to 5 was 10% (levofloxacin 8%; TMP/SMZ 10%; control group 16%). The rates of postoperative bacteriuria ranged widely between centers (0%-75%). Statistically significant (p<0.05) risk factors for bacteriuria (range) were qualification of surgeon (19%-37%), presence of a suprapubic catheter (22%-34%), disconnection of the closed drainage system (25%-52%), operating time (12%-31%) and operative centre (0%-75%). Total antibiotic consumption (for prophylaxis and treatment) in the control group was higher and more expensive than in groups with antibiotic prophylaxis (6.9 vs. 5.0 doses/patient; 24.9 vs. 19.7 /patient) (p<0.0001). Postoperative complications in patients with bacteriuria (cfu> or =10(4)/ml) were more frequent than in non bacteriuric (cfu<10(4)/ml) patients (17% vs. 8%) (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: It is debatable whether postoperative bacteriuria is the key parameter to define efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing TUR-P. The rate of bacteriuria, however, correlated well with the overall rate of postoperative complications. Therefore, it seems reasonable to lower the rate of bacteriuria by prophylaxis. Since patients without antibiotic prophylaxis received at the end even more antibiotic doses than patients with prophylaxis, the overall selection pressure by antibiotic usage can obviously not be lowered by resigning prophylaxis. Therefore we conclude that at least patients at risk should receive antibiotic prophylaxis prior to TUR-P.     

Oxacillin prophylaxis in cerebrospinal fluid shunt procedures: results of a randomized open study in 60 hydrocephalic patients

A 27-month open randomized trial (October 1981-January 1984) was carried out to study the prophylactic efficacy of antibiotics in 60 hydrocephalic patients being shunted for the first time. The treatment group received oxacillin at a dosage of 200 mg/kg/day by six bolus intravenous injections, beginning with anesthetic induction and continuing for 24 hours after the operations. The minimum postoperative observation was 6 months. Six patients in the control group developed cerebrospinal fluid infections (20%) as compared with only a single patient in the oxacillin group (3.3%); this difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Time of development of cerebrospinal fluid infection was brief (86% at 6 weeks), and as usual staphylococci were the pathogens most frequently implicated. This study would appear to confirm the choice of oxacillin for prevention of meningitis. Nevertheless, the frequency of methicillin-resistant staphylococci, which account for 20% of nosocomial staphylococcal infections, constitutes a limiting factor for such prevention.     

Ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin for prophylaxis during hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation

The objective of the current retrospective study was to compare differences in rate of breakthrough infections for ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem‐cell transplant (HSCT) patients treated for multiple myeloma. This was a retrospective, cohort study comparing autologous HSCT recipients treated for multiple myeloma who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis vs levofloxacin prophylaxis. A total of 297 patients, 143 levofloxacin‐ and 154 ciprofloxacin‐treated were included. There was a significantly higher incidence of bloodstream infections in the ciprofloxacin group (24/154) compared to the levofloxacin group (10/143), P = .03, primarily caused by a statistically higher incidence of gram‐positive bloodstream infections (ciprofloxacin [21/154] vs levofloxacin [8/143]; P < .01). Clinically relevant differences exist between fluoroquinolone agents used for prophylaxis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis was more effective than ciprofloxacin prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections in this study.     

Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized study of tosufloxacin versus levofloxacin

Objectives:   To assess the efficacy of tosufloxacin as a prophylactic agent for transrectal biopsy of the prostate (TBP), we conducted a randomized prospective study comparing tosufloxacin versus levofloxacin.
Methods:   A randomized prospective study comparing tosufloxacin versus levofloxacin was performed. In group A, 124 patients received 300 mg tosufloxacin tosilate (including 204 mg tosufloxacin) twice daily for 2 days, with the initial dose being 2 h prior to biopsy. In group B, 119 patients received 200 mg levofloxacin in the same manner.
Results:   Infectious complications were reported equally in six cases in each group (4.8% in group A and 5.0% in group B). Each group included five cases of acute prostatitis and one of cystitis. Six patients suffering from prostatitis required hospitalization, while those with symptomatic urinary tract infection were treated as outpatients.
Conclusions:   Tosufloxacin was as effective as levofloxacin when administered twice daily for 2 days as prophylaxis for TBP, which suggests that this regimen is useful for reducing the clinical and febrile infection rate following TBP.     

Clinical efficacy and cost benefit of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis with levofloxacin on neurological surgery

OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy and cost benefit of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis with levofloxacin (LVFX) on neurosurgical operation were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergone burr hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma were enrolled into this study. These patients had preoperative intravenous drip infusion of 1.0 g of cefazolin (CEZ), and were given oral 200 mg of LVFX twice a day for postoperative 6 days on their operations. Clinical effect on prophylaxis of postsurgical infection and surgical site infection as well as safeness of the drug were assessed. Their clinical course were retrospectively compared with another fifty patients as control group who had intravenous administration of CEZ for consecutive 7 days on same operation. RESULTS: There were no patients who had postsurgical infection and surgical site infection as well as drug related adverse effect, whereas three patients in control group suffered urinary infections or respiratory tract infection during their postsurgical course. CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive oral antimicrobial prophylaxis with LVFX is effective to prevent postoperative infections and surgical site infections, and attractive from the medical economic point of view.     

Prospective interventional study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B as prophylaxis of fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infections are a life-threatening complication in transplant recipients. The prevalence of fungal infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is 5% to 42%. The most common isolated pathogens are Candida and Aspergillus species. High-risk liver transplant recipients are more susceptible to the development of invasive fungal infections, with prevalence >40% and mortality rates of 78% to 100%. The strategy for fungal prophylaxis in this population has not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 100 consecutive OLT followed for 28 months, 21 recipients (15 men, overall mean age of 48.5 years, range 23-65 years) were considered to be high risk for the development of fungal infections when they presented at least one of the following criteria: acute liver failure, assisted ventilation >7 days, retransplantation, relaparotomy, antibiotic therapy >14 days, transfusion requirements >20 red blood cells units, and/or biliary leakage. This group received intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (1 mg/kg/d for 7-10 days). RESULTS: One-year survival in the high-risk group was 80%. Prevalence of invasive fungal infection was 9.5%. No Candida infection was observed. Two patients developed Aspergillus infection: an abdominal aspergillosis treated with percutaneous drainage and liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/d) showed a favorable clinical outcome. The other patient who developed brain aspergillosis died 25 days after OLT. Adverse events related to the drug were hypokalemia (n = 2), back pain (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 2). None of these events required withdrawal of the prophylaxis regimen. CONCLUSION: In our series, prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B in high-risk liver graft recipients showed a low rate of severe fungal infections. More studies are needed in order to determine the highest risk population and the best drug dosage.     

Use of quinupristin/dalfopristin in a critical patient with a methicillin-resistant Staphilococcus aureus infection

The growing incidence of infections due to Gram-positive multiresistant germs has stimulated research into new drugs endowed with broader activity, that are useful in case of infections unresponsive to common antibiotics. The case of a 28-year-old man infected with a methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus non responder to therapy with glycopeptide antibiotics is reported. At admission the patient presented a septic condition and required mechanical ventilation. Antibiotic therapy was immediately started with teicoplanin+meropenem. Blood culture and bronchial aspirate evidenced a methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus with high sensibility to glycopeptide antibiotics. Although this therapy produced a slight improvement in clinical condition and the patient was extubated, fever and leucocytosis associated with a BAL positive to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, in vitro susceptible to glycopeptides, persisted. Considering the possibility of a non-responder condition of the patient to glycopeptide antibiotics, quinupristin/dalfopristin was added. The streptogramin produced a quick improvement in clinical condition with resolution of sepsis and culture sterilization. The patient improved progressively and was discharged. In conclusion, in our experience the association quinupristin/dalfopristin was effective in the resolution of a critical methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection non responder to classical treatment with glycopeptide antibiotics that showed a high sensibility in vitro.