Single-dose pharmacokinetics of nizatidine (Axid) in children

The pharmacokinetics of nizatidine following a single 5.0 mg/kg oral dose given as an extemporaneous liquid formulation in apple juice was examined in 12 healthy children (8.0 +/- 2.4 years, 30.7 +/- 8.4 kg). Nizatidine and N-desmethylnizatidine were quantitated by HPLC/MS from five post dose blood samples taken over a 12-hour period. The apparent terminal elimination rate constant for nizatidine in the pediatric subjects (0.58 +/- 0.8h(-1)) was virtually identical to that (0.54 +/- 0.13 h(-1)) previously reported from adult studies. When corrected for an estimated 30% reduction in nizatidine oral bioavailability observed in adults upon coingestion of the drug with other fruit/vegetable juices, nizatidine pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (e.g., Cmax, CL/F, Vss/F) in our pediatric subjects were similar to those previously reported in adults who were administered dimensionally similar (e.g., approximately 4 mg/kg) solid oral doses of the drug. Examination of the mean area under the curve (i.e., AUC0-infinity for nizatidine and N-desmethylnizatidine suggested an approximate 15% metabolic conversion of the parent drug. Finally, nizatidine plasma concentrations in pediatric patients following a single 5.0 mg/kg oral dose exceeded the EC50 value of the drug for gastric acid suppression determined from adult studies for approximately 6 hours.     

The inhibitory effect of probenecid on renal excretion of famotidine in young, healthy volunteers

Effects of coadministration of probenecid on pharmacokinetic behaviors of famotidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, after oral administration, were studied in eight young, healthy volunteers. They received an oral 20 mg dose of famotidine with and without coadministration of oral 1500 mg doses of probenecid. The mean area under the serum famotidine concentration-time curve up to 10 hours was increased by coadministration of probenecid from 424 +/- 19 (SEM) to 768 +/- 39 ng.hr/ml. The mean urinary excretion rate of unchanged famotidine, the mean amount of unchanged famotidine excreted in urine up to 24 hours and mean renal clearance were decreased by coadministration of probenecid. The mean tubular secretion clearance of famotidine was decreased from 196.2 +/- 21.4 to 22.0 +/- 4.2 ml/min. These data suggest that probenecid, which is a classical inhibitor of renal tubular secretion of organic anions, inhibits the renal tubular secretion of famotidine, which exists partly in a cationic form under physiological pH conditions.     

Nizatidine suppression of basal gastric acid output: a comparison of two intravenous dosage regimens

To study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two intravenous nizatidine dosing regimens, serial plasma concentrations and continuous intragastric pH were monitored simultaneously in 10 subjects with a documented history of duodenal or gastric ulcers. A 24-hour gastric pH profile was characterized for a 300 mg daily dose of nizatidine randomly administered both as 100 mg every 8 hours and 150 mg every 12 hours. No significant differences were observed in the mean pharmacokinetic parameters between the two dosing regimens. Pharmacodynamic parameters for the 100 mg every 8 hours versus the 150 mg every 12 hours regimen were not significantly different except for percent of time during the 24-hour study period that the pH was maintained greater than 4 (43.6 +/- 20.7 versus 34.7 +/- 18.3, P less than .05). A significant relationship was demonstrated for both regimens (P less than .05) between the percent time pH greater than 4 and area under the plasma curve for the 24 hour study period. The lack of a significant difference in nizatidine pharmacokinetics between the two dosage regimens suggests a pharmacodynamic cause for the greater cumulative pH effect of the every 8 hour regimen.     

Nocturnal doses of ranitidine and nizatidine do not affect the disposition of diazepam

The disposition of diazepam (D) after a single oral dose of 10 mg was evaluated in nine healthy male volunteers under the following conditions (randomized, double-blind, crossover design): D + comedication of placebo and D + nocturnal dosing with 300 mg ranitidine or 300 mg nizatidine. Plasma concentrations of D and its major active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DD), were monitored by a gas-liquid chromatography-electron-capture detection assay for 84 hours. Neither ranitidine nor nizatidine had any significant effect on the hepatic elimination of D as characterized by its terminal half-life (mean +/- SD) of 35.3 +/- 24.2 hours (+ ranitidine: 30.1 +/- 9.9 hr; + nizatidine: 37.3 +/- 18.3 hr) or total plasma clearance of 28.2 +/- 12.0 mL/min (+ ranitidine: 26.5 +/- 7.9 mL/min; + nizatidine: 26.7 +/- 10.4 mL/min). Likewise, the formation of DD as measured by its AUC was not affected by ranitidine or nizatidine. Thus, it can be concluded that concomitant once-daily dosing (300 mg nocturnally) with ranitidine or nizatidine does not impair hepatic drug metabolism.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of dapsone

Dapsone (DDS) has for about 4 decades been the most important antileprosy drug. Concentrations of dapsone and its monoacetyl metabolite, MADDS, can be determined in biological media by high-performance liquid chromatography. After oral administration, the drug is slowly absorbed, the maximum concentration in plasma being reached at about 4 hours, with an absorption half-life of about 1.1 hours. However, the extent of absorption has not been adequately determined. The elimination half-life of dapsone is about 30 hours. The drug shows linear pharmacokinetics within the therapeutic range and the time-course after oral administration fits a 2-compartment model. The concentration-time profile of dapsone after parenteral administration is reviewed. Of clinical importance is the development of a new long acting injection, which permits monthly supervised administration as recommended by the World Health Organization. Following dapsone injection in gluteal subcutaneous adipose tissue, a sufficiently sustained absorption for this purpose has been reported. Dapsone is about 70 to 90% protein bound and its monoacetylated metabolite (MADDS) is almost completely protein bound. The volume of distribution of dapsone is estimated to be 1.5 L/kg. It is distributed in most tissues, but M. leprae living in the Schwann cells of the nerves might be unaffected. Dapsone crosses the placenta and is excreted in breast milk and saliva. Dapsone is extensively metabolised. Dapsone, some MADDS and their hydroxylated metabolites are found in urine, partly conjugated as N-glucuronides and N-sulphates. The acetylation ratio (MADDS:dapsone) shows a genetically determined bimodal distribution and allows the definition of 'slow' and 'rapid' acetylators. As enterohepatic circulation occurs, the elimination half-life of dapsone is markedly decreased after oral administration of activated charcoal. This permits successful treatment in cases of intoxication. The daily dose of dapsone in leprosy is 50 to 100mg, but varies from 50 to 400mg in the treatment of other dermatological disorders. In malaria prophylaxis, a weekly dose of 100mg is used in combination with pyrimethamine. Side effects are mostly not serious below a daily dose of 100mg and are mainly haematological effects. The dapsone therapeutic serum concentration range can be defined as 0.5 to 5 mg/L. Alcoholic liver disease decreases the protein binding of dapsone; coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis may delay its oral absorption and severe leprosy has been reported to affect the extent of absorption.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effect of nizatidine on paracetamol and its metabolites in human plasma

The effect of the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, nizatidine, on plasma concentrations of paracetamol has been investigated with respectto hepatic metabolism. Paracetamol (1000 mg) together with 300 or 150 mg nizatidine or placebo was orally administered to five healthy male volunteers. Venous blood samples were taken before and after administration. Plasma paracetamol and paracetamol conjugates (glucuronide and sulfate) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curves of each volunteer. The plasma nizatidine concentration was highest (2420.0+/-192.4 and 996.0+/-54.6 ng mL(-1)) in the sample taken 1 h after administration of 300 mg nizatidine (high dose) and 150mg nizatidine (low dose), respectively. Plasma paracetamol concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were increased significantly at 45-120 min and 45-60 min, respectively, compared with placebo. The total area under the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curve from 0 to 180 min (2361.5+/-146.4 and 2085.75+/-73.5 microg min mL(-1)) significantly increased after coadministration of nizatidine (high and low doses), respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Paracetamol glucuronide concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were decreased significantly at 30-45 min and 30 min, respectively, compared with placebo. However, plasma paracetamol sulfate concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were not significantly altered. The coadministration of nizatidine (150 and 300 mg) dose-dependently reduces plasma paracetamol glucuronide concentrations and increases plasma paracetamol concentrations. The effects of nizatidine could result from the inhibition of glucuronyltransferase. Thus, care is necessary when paracetamol and nizatidine are coadministered.     

Pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin enantiomers in humans

The pharmacokinetics of R-clinafloxacin and S-clinafloxacin enantiomers of the broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic, clinafloxacin, were characterized in selected volunteer subjects and patients after the administration of oral and intravenous doses of racemic drug. The absorption of each enantiomer was rapid and nearly complete after a single, oral 400 mg racemic dose. The mean (+/- SD) bioavailability of R-clinafloxacin was 87.5% +/- 4.8% compared to 86.2% +/- 5.8% for S-clinafloxacin. The mean Cmax of each enantiomer was 1.19 micrograms/mL, with plasma concentrations of each enantiomer remaining above 0.1 microgram/mL for at least 12 hours. No notable differences in the disposition of R-clinafloxacin and S-clinafloxacin were observed. After a single 400 mg intravenous dose of racemic drug, mean (+/- SD) t1/2 was 5.6 +/- 0.3 hours and 5.7 +/- 0.4 hours, plasma Cl was 329 +/- 49 mL/min and 314 +/- 45 mL/min, and Vdss was 138 +/- 18 L and 134 +/- 16 L for R- and S-clinafloxacin, respectively. Two healthy volunteers each received a single 400 mg oral dose of racemic clinafloxacin (alone) and with oral administration of 1 gm probenecid separated by a 1-week washout period between treatments. With probenecid coadministration, the increase in AUC0-infinity was 75% and 83% for R-clinafloxacin and was 71% and 75% for S-clinafloxacin in each subject, respectively. Probenecid increased the total exposure (AUC) of both R-clinafloxacin and S-clinafloxacin, although it had no stereo-selective effects on the disposition of either enantiomer. The antimicrobial potency of the isomers was also evaluated. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that the two compounds were comparable in their inhibitory activities, as all MICs were within twofold for each organism tested. These results demonstrate that in addition to their similar antimicrobial potency, R- and S-clinafloxacin have nearly identical disposition characteristics and are eliminated by similar mechanisms that display no apparent enantioselectivity in man.     

The bioequivalence of nizatidine (Axid) in two extemporaneously and one commercially prepared oral liquid formulations compared with capsule

Nizatidine (Axid) is an H2-receptor antagonist used for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. Given the frequency of these conditions in children and the potential for pediatric use of nizatidine, an oral liquid dosage formulation would provide an alternative treatment option for patients unable to swallow solid oral dosage forms. This study was designed as an open-label, single-dose, four-way crossover trial to investigate the bioequivalence of 150 mg nizatidine administered in three oral liquid formulations (a commercially prepared oral syrup, an extemporaneous solution in apple juice, and an extemporaneous suspension in infant formula) relative to the marketed capsule formulation. Twenty-four adult subjects (ages 31.2 +/- 7.5 years; weight 71.1 +/- 11.8 kg) were enrolled, and blood samples for determination of plasma nizatidine concentrations were collected prior to drug administration and at 19 discrete intervals over a 24-hour postdose interval. Nizatidine was quantitated from plasma using a validated HPLC-MS assay, and a noncompartmental approach was used to describe nizatidine biodisposition in all subjects. Significant treatment effects were observed for log-normalized Cmax, AUC0-n, and AUC0-infinity (p < 0.001). Further evaluation revealed that nizatidine prepared in apple juice was markedly less bioavailable than the reference capsule, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.518-0.626, 0.682-0.751, and 0.696-0.763 for Cmax, AUC0-n, and AUC0-infinity, respectively. The remaining two oral formulations demonstrated 90% CI within the guidelines established by the Food and Drug Administration (e.g., 0.80-1.25). Thus, nizatidine in infant formula and the commercially prepared oral syrup can be considered bioequivalent to the reference capsule.     

Effects of successive doses of nizatidine, cimetidine and ranitidine on serum gastrin level and gastric acid secretion.

Nizatidine (N-[2-[[[2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]- 4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]-N'-methyl-2-nitro-1,1-ethenediamine , CAS 76963-41-2) is a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist which shows suppression of gastric acid secretion and antiulcer activity. In the present experiment, the effects of single s.c. administration of nizatidine, cimetidine and ranitidine on serum gastrin levels were studied in fasted rats. Nizatidine at 100 mg/kg increased serum gastrin level 3 h after administration, which however, returned to basal level 6 h after administration. Cimetidine and ranitidine at respective doses of 250 and 100 mg/kg markedly increased serum gastrin levels 3 and 6 h after administration. In a previous study, the suppressive effect of nizatidine on basal gastric acid secretion was 82.8% at a dose of 100 mg/kg s.c. in rat pylrus-ligated model. On the basis of these findings, changes in basal gastric acid secretion and serum gastrin level after withdrawal of nizatidine, cimetidine and ranitidine administered for 14 consecutive days were studied. One day after withdrawal, nizatidine at 100 mg/kg showed a tendency to increase the basal gastric acid secretion. However, 3 and 7 days after administration, almost no changes were obtained. Cimetidine at 250 mg/kg showed a tendency to increase the basal gastric acid secretion 7 days after withdrawal of the drug. Ranitidine at 100 mg/kg induced no changes in basal gastric acid secretion after withdrawal. No obvious influences of all drugs on serum gastrin level after withdrawals were obtained. These results indicate that consecutive administration of nizatidine may cause only a transient increase of gastric acid secretion but no hypergastrinaemia after its withdrawal.     

N-acetylation phenotyping with dapsone in a mainland Chinese population.

1 The N-acetylation of dapsone (DDS) was studied in 108 unrelated Chinese subjects residing in the mainland of China. 2 The frequency of slow acetylators determined using the plasma monoacetyldapsone to DDS ratio (MADDS/DDS, slow acetylators less than 0.30 and rapid acetylators greater than 0.35) at 3 h after an oral dose of DDS (100 mg) was 13.0% (14 of the 108 subjects) with a 95% confidence interval of 7.9 to 20.6%. 3 The mean plasma concentration of MADDS was about three times lower in the slow than in the rapid acetylators and there was a highly significant correlation (rs = 0.886, P less than 0.001) between plasma MADDS concentration and acetylation ratio. 4 Urinary acetylation ratios (MADDS/DDS) and cumulative urinary excretion of MADDS were significantly (P less than 0.001) lower in slow acetylators compared with rapid acetylators. In addition, there was a significant relationship (rs = 0.510 to 0.718, P less than 0.001) between plasma and urinary acetylation ratios. However, the distribution of the urinary acetylation ratio was not bimodal. 5 The urinary acetylation ratio after an oral dose of DDS is not a discriminative index for determining acetylation phenotype.     

Pharmacokinetics of dapsone gel, 5% for the treatment of acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND: Oral dapsone has been available for over 60 years and has been used to treat severe acne vulgaris; however, the oral formulation is known to cause dose-dependent haematological reactions and is currently indicated only for diseases such as dermatitis herpetiformis and Hansen's disease. A gel formulation of dapsone was recently developed to treat acne vulgaris. As dapsone is administered topically, it was expected that systemic absorption would be considerably lower than that observed with oral dapsone therapy, thereby avoiding any adverse haematological effects. OBJECTIVE: To report the pharmacokinetic profile of topically applied dapsone gel, 5% in the treatment of acne vulgaris. STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Three prospective, open-label studies enrolled a total of 548 subjects with acne vulgaris: two phase I pharmacokinetic studies (crossover and drug interaction) and one phase III long-term safety study. In the crossover study (n = 18), topical dapsone gel applied twice daily for a total of 14 days to 22.5% of the body surface area was compared with a single dose of oral dapsone 100mg (the typical clinical dose). In the drug-interaction study (n = 24), oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, topical dapsone gel monotherapy and the two in combination were used twice daily for 7, 21 and 7 days, respectively. In the long-term safety study (n = 506), topical dapsone gel was applied twice daily to acne-affected areas for up to 12 months. Blood samples were drawn at various timepoints in each study to assess drug and metabolite concentrations. Systemic concentrations of dapsone, N-acetyl dapsone, dapsone hydroxylamine, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole were determined, according to the study design. RESULTS: In the crossover study, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours for dapsone was 417.5 ng x h/mL after 2 weeks of dapsone gel therapy (n = 10), compared with an AUC from time zero to infinity of 52,641 ng x h/mL after a single dose of oral dapsone; this represents a 126-fold lower systemic exposure for dapsone gel at typical therapeutic doses. In the drug-interaction study, the AUC from 0 to 12 hours for dapsone was 221.52 ng x h/mL after 3 weeks of dapsone gel monotherapy compared with 320.3 ng x h/mL after 1 week of coadministration with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. In the long-term safety study, the mean plasma dapsone concentrations ranged from 7.5 to 11 ng/mL over 12 months. Overall, total systemic exposures to dapsone and its metabolites were approximately 100-fold less for dapsone gel than for oral dapsone, even in the presence of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. There were no reports of any haematological adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topical application of dapsone gel in various settings ranging from 2 weeks to 12 months resulted in systemic exposures to dapsone and its metabolites that were approximately 100-fold less than those after oral dapsone at a therapeutic dose level. The concentrations of dapsone and its metabolites reached steady state and did not increase during prolonged treatment.     

Simultaneous estimation of serum concentrations of dapsone, monoacetyldapsone, and pyrimethamine in Chinese men on maloprim for malaria prophylaxis using reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography

A reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography method was developed to simultaneously estimate serum concentrations of dapsone (DDS), monoacetyldapsone (MADDS), and pyrimethamine (PYR) in 34 young adult Chinese men after they had taken the sixth weekly dose of Maloprim for malaria prophylaxis. Serum concentrations of DDS, MADDS, and PYR after 24 h were (mean +/- SEM) 374 +/- 31.3, 310 +/- 30.4, and 121 +/- 7.9 ng/ml, respectively. The 72-h serum concentrations of DDS, MADDS, and PYR were (mean +/- SEM) 134 +/- 21.6, 115 +/- 17.9, and 80 +/- 7.2 ng/ml, respectively. Serum concentrations of DDS and MADDS in many subjects after 120 h were less than 20 ng/ml, while mean +/- SEM concentration of PYR was 53 +/- 5.6 ng/ml. Acetylator phenotyping of the subjects showed that there were 31 (91%) fast acetylators, three (9%) intermediate acetylators, and no slow acetylators.     

Single-dose clinical pharmacokinetic studies of gefitinib

BACKGROUND: The objective of the five clinical studies presented in this article was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of gefitinib (IRESSA, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Studies 1 and 3-5 recruited healthy male volunteers aged 18-65 years; study 2 recruited male or female patients aged>or=18 years with any solid malignant tumour expressing EGFR and refractory to standard therapy. Gefitinib administration was as follows: study 1 (bioavailability in healthy volunteers; n=12)--intravenous infusion of 50 or 100 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 2 (bioavailability in cancer patients; n=19)--intravenous infusion of 50 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 3 (intrasubject variability; n=24)--two single oral doses of 250 mg; study 4 (dose-proportionality; n=15)--three single oral doses of 50-500 mg; study 5 (effect of food; n=26)--two single doses of 250 mg under either fed or fasted conditions. In all studies, venous blood samples for determination of gefitinib plasma concentrations were collected at predetermined intervals. Plasma concentrations of gefitinib were measured using liquid-liquid extraction after basification followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Study 1: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 57% in healthy volunteers. Absorption was moderately slow, with geometric mean (gmean) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 85 ng/mL (range 43.5-110 ng/mL) reached 5 hours following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 2: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 59% in patients. Absorption was again moderately slow, with gmean Cmax of 159 ng/mL (range 48.7-324 ng/mL) typically reached 3 hours (range 1-8 hours) following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 3: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinfinity) and Cmax were variable--up to 15-fold between subjects and 2-fold within an individual. Study 4: AUCinfinity and Cmax increased with dose across the range of 50-500 mg, and increased dose-proportionally up to 250 mg. Study 5: Small, clinically insignificant increases in AUCinfinity and Cmax were seen in the presence of food (32% and 37%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The gefitinib 250 mg tablet is orally bioavailable in both healthy volunteers and cancer patients; bioavailability is independent of dose and unaffected by food to any clinically significant extent. Gefitinib undergoes rapid plasma clearance and has an extensive volume of distribution, resulting in a pharmacokinetic profile supportive of a once-daily dosage regimen.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel nizatidine controlled-release formulation in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH effects of a novel nizatidine controlled-release (CR) formulation were compared to a currently marketed immediate-release (IR) nizatidine formulation (Axid). The bimodal pulsatile release characteristics of nizatidine CR decreased its Cmax by approximately 42% compared to nizatidine IR while maintaining 90% relative bioavailability; tmax was approximately 1.6 times longer with the CR formulation. These characteristics enabled controlled-release nizatidine to sustain effective plasma drug concentrations for a greater duration than immediate-release nizatidine over the dosing intervals. In multiple doses, the 24-hour AUC ratio for all comparisons of nizatidine CR 150 mg bid, nizatidine CR 300 mg daily, and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid was between 97% and 99%. Mean pH AUC values for nizatidine CR 150 mg bid and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid were similar overall during the 0- to 14-hour and 14- to 24-hour dosing intervals. For the 14- to 24-hour dosing interval, nizatidine CR 150 mg maintained gastric pH over 3.0 and 4.0 for 42% and 27% of the time compared to 39% and 23% for nizatidine IR, respectively. Nizatidine CR 300 mg, compared to the 150-mg CR and IR regimens, had a greater effect on increasing evening intragastric pH, thus providing support for the potential utility of nizatidine CR 300 mg dosed at night in alleviating nocturnal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral and intravenous cimetidine in seriously ill patients

This study was done to determine if the pharmacokinetics and gastric pH response of intravenous cimetidine are superior to oral dosing in seriously ill patients. A paired study of intravenous followed by oral liquid cimetidine was given to eight men and two women who were inpatients in a VA Hospital. Treatment was prescribed for either upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or prophylaxis against GI bleeding. All patients received cimetidine 300 mg every 6 hours intravenously on day 1 and orally on day 2. After the fourth dose each day, venous blood samples and gastric pH measurements were taken serially for 6 hours. Peak serum cimetidine concentration was 2.0 +/- 0.5 mg/L for the intravenous dose and 1.5 +/- 0.3 mg/L for the oral dose (P = .001). Area under the curve (AUC) of cimetidine concentration was 3.81 +/- 1.1 mg/hr/L for the intravenous dose and 4.19 +/- 1.22 mg/hr/L for the oral dose (P greater than .30). Bioavailability (AUCpo/AUCiv) was 1.13 +/- 0.25, demonstrating complete oral absorption. The time during a 6-hour dosing interval that the gastric pH remained above 3.0 was 3.3 +/- 2.1 hours for the intravenous dose and 2.5 +/- 2.3 hours for the oral dose, P = .171). The time that the serum cimetidine concentration remained above 0.5 mg/L was 2.0 +/- 0.9 hours for the intravenous dose and 2.7 +/- 1.0 hours for the oral dose (P = .055). We concluded that bioavailability, time that gastric pH is maintained greater 3.0, and time that the serum cimetidine concentration is greater than 0.5 mg/L for intravenous cimetidine are not significantly different from oral cimetidine in seriously ill patients.     

Temelastine, a novel histamine H1-receptor antagonist, does not induce oxidative hepatic enzyme activity in man

Temelastine (SK&F 93944) is a novel histamine H1-receptor antagonist with a high degree of protein binding and predominant hepatic elimination. The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine were assessed in eight male normal subjects after single oral doses of 10 mg/kg antipyrine, administered prior to chronic dosing with temelastine 100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, and 48 hours after the last dose of temelastine. After the first dose of antipyrine the mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 78.3 mumol/l (range: 60.3 to 95.8), the mean AUC (0-infinity) was 1330 mumol.h/l (range: 1030 to 2074), the mean apparent terminal disposition rate constant K was 0.0656 h-1 (range: 0.0428 to 0.0769) and the mean residence time (MRT) was 16.7 h on average (range: 14.4 to 24.1). After the second dose the mean Cmax, AUC (0-infinity) and MRT had slightly increased by on average 11, 5 and 7% respectively whereas the mean K had decreased by 9%. None of the differences between the means of the log-transformed parameters for second-first dose reached statistical significance. Temelastine therefore did not appear to induce hepatic oxidative enzyme activity in man, as judged by antipyrine as a model substance.     

Lack of interaction between nizatidine and warfarin during chronic administration

Nizatidine is a new antagonist of H2 receptors. The nizatidine warfarin interaction was investigated in healthy volunteers during chronic warfarin (mean warfarin dose: 5 +/- 0.9 mg/d) and nizatidine (300 mg/d) administration. Nizatidine coadministration did not increase the prothrombin time, kaolin-cephalin clotting time, and did not modify the activity of clotting factors II, VII, IX, X. Nizatidine did not influence the steady-state plasma warfarin concentration.     

Minimal in vivo activation of CYP2C9-mediated flurbiprofen metabolism by dapsone.

Dapsone has been shown to activate flurbiprofen 4'-hydroxylation by expressed CYP2C9 enzyme and in human liver microsomes. It has been suggested that this observation is due to substrate cooperativity on enzyme activity; however, the in vivo relevance of this observation is unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether dapsone can act cooperatively with flurbiprofen to activate the in vivo metabolism of flurbiprofen to 4'-hydroxyflurbiprofen. Twelve healthy subjects received single-dose flurbiprofen 50 mg on three occasions: alone (visit A); 2 h after a single dapsone 100-mg dose (visit B); and 2 h after the seventh daily dose of dapsone 100 mg (visit C). Concentrations of flurbiprofen and 4'-hydroxy flurbiprofen in plasma and urine and dapsone and N-acetyldapsone in plasma were determined by HPLC. Flurbiprofen pharmacokinetic parameters for the three visits were estimated by non-compartmental methods and compared in the absence and presence of dapsone. Flurbiprofen apparent oral clearance was increased by approximately 11% (P < 0.02) after dapsone 100 mg for 7 days. Dapsone plasma concentrations averaged 5 +/- 2 microM after a single dose and 11 +/- 4 microM after seven daily 100 mg doses. These dapsone plasma concentrations were within the range of concentrations producing activation of flurbiprofen metabolism by CYP2C9 in vitro. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that dapsone does influence flurbiprofen metabolism in vivo in a cooperative way to enhance metabolism. However, the magnitude of effect is substantially less than observed in vitro.     

Effects of the new anti-ulcer drug nizatidine on prostaglandins in the rat gastric mucosa.

The effects of nizatidine (N-[2-[[[2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]- 4-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]ethyl]-N'-methyl-2-nitro-1,1-ethenediamine , CAS 76963-41-2), a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist, on the content of prostaglandins (PGs) in the rat gastric mucosa at doses that inhibit basal gastric acid secretion were compared with those of two other histamine H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine. Nizatidine did not inhibit basal gastric acid secretion at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg but showed dose-dependent inhibition at doses of 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg. This drug had no effects on the content of PG in the gastric mucosa when subcutaneously administered at doses of 0.4, 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg once daily for 5 days. Cimetidine and ranitidine administered at doses that markedly inhibit basal gastric acid secretion (250 and 100 mg/kg/d, respectively) had no effects on the content of PG in the gastric mucosa. On the other hand, nizatidine, cimetidine, or ranitidine at concentrations of 1-100 mumols/l did not inhibit in vitro PGE2 synthesis using sheep seminal vesicle microsomes. These results suggest that nizatidine did not affect in vitro PGE2 synthesis and even doses that markedly inhibit gastric acid secretion had no effects on the content of PGs in the gastric mucosa.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence testing of generic ondansetron preparations in healthy Thai male volunteers

SUBJECTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of oral preparations of generic ondansetron were investigated in healthy Thai males. The test preparations were Vomitron 8 and Vomitron 4, the reference was Zofran. The three products were administered as an 8 mg single oral dose, in a three-period four-sequence cross-over design with one-week washout period. An intravenous 8 mg Zofran was administered on the forth visit. Plasma ondansetron concentrations were determined by HPLC and the pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Following i.v. ondansetron, the mean values of its elimination half-life, its plasma clearance, and its volume of distribution were 4.5 hours, 398 ml/min, and 130 liters, respectively. Its oral bioavailability averaged 67%, and the elimination half-life after oral administration was 5.6 hours. The time to reach the maximal concentration (Tmax, hour) of Zofran (1.21 +/- 0.26) was statistically faster than that of Vomitron 8 (1.33 +/- 0.54) and Vomitron 4 (1.46 +/- 0.50). The 90% confidence intervals of the AUC0-infinity and Cmax ratios muT/muR for (Vomitron 8/Zofran) were 0.88 - 1.12 and 0. 85 - 1.08, respectively. Similarly the 90% CI of the-AUC0-infinity and Cmax ratios for (Vomitron 4/Zofran) were 0.96 - 1.17 and 1.01 - 1.19, respectively. CONCLUSION: These values were within the acceptable range of 0.80 - 1.25, thus our study demonstrated the bioequivalence of Vomitron and Zofran with respect to the rate (Cmax) and extent of absorption (AUC0-infinity).