共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
Tindall AJ Steinlechner CW Lavy CB Mannion S Mkandawire N 《Journal of pediatric orthopedics》2005,25(5):627-629
This study looks at whether orthopaedic clinical officers, a cadre of clinicians who are not doctors, can effectively manipulate idiopathic clubfeet using the Ponseti technique. One hundred consecutive cases of uncomplicated idiopathic clubfeet in newborn babies were manipulated by orthopaedic clinical officers. Fifty-seven of these were fully corrected to a plantigrade position by Ponseti manipulation alone, and a further 41 were corrected by manipulation followed by a simple percutaneous tenotomy. Orthopaedic clinical officers therefore corrected 98 out of 100 feet; the remaining 2 feet were referred for surgical correction. This shows that the Ponseti method is suitable for use by nonmedical personnel in the developing world to achieve a plantigrade foot. 相似文献
3.
Gul A Sambandam S 《Journal of pediatric orthopedics》2007,27(8):971; author reply 971-971; author reply 972
4.
Mackenzie GD Jamieson NF Novelli MR Mosse CA Clark BR Thorpe SM Bown SG Lovat LB 《Lasers in medical science》2008,23(2):203-210
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is a novel treatment for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in Barrett’s
esophagus (BE). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of differing light doses. Patients with HGD in BE received oral
ALA (60 mg/kg) activated by low (500 J/cm), medium (750 J/cm), high (1,000 J/cm), or highest (1,000 J/cm ×2) light dose at
635 nm. Follow-up was by regular endoscopy with quadrantic biopsies. Twenty-four patients were treated. Successful eradication
of HGD was significantly correlated with light dose (log rank, p < 0.01). Six of eight patients (75%) treated with the highest light dose, one of two treated with high dose (50%), two of
nine (22%) receiving medium light dose, and zero of five receiving low light dose had successful eradication of HGD (median
follow-up 45 months, range 1–78 months). No skin photosensitivity or esophageal strictures occurred. The efficacy of ALA-PDT
for eradication of HGD in BE is closely related to the light dose used. With a drug dose of 60 mg/kg and light at 635 nm,
we recommend a minimum light dose of 1,000 J/cm of esophagus. This dose appears safe. 相似文献
5.
6.
Mun Keong Kwan Chee Kidd Chiu Teik Seng Chan Siti Mariam Abd Gani Shun Herng Tan Chris Yin Wei Chan 《The spine journal》2018,18(1):53-62
Background Context
Selection of upper instrumented vertebra for Lenke 5 and 6 curves remains debatable, and several authors have described different selection strategies.Objective
This study analyzed the flexibility of the unfused thoracic segments above the “potential upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)” (T1–T12) and its compensatory ability in Lenke 5 and 6 curves using supine side bending (SSB) radiographs.Study Design
A retrospective study was used.Patient Sample
This study comprised 100 patients.Outcome Measures
The ability of the unfused thoracic segments above the potential UIV, that is, T1–T12, to compensate in Lenke 5 and 6 curves was determined. We also analyzed postoperative radiological outcome of this cohort of patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.Methods
Right and left SSB were obtained. Right side bending (RSB) and left side bending (LSB) angles were measured from T1 to T12. Compensatory ability of thoracic segments was defined as the ability to return to neutral (center sacral vertical line [CSVL]) with the assumption of maximal correction of lumbar curve with a horizontal UIV. The Lenke 5 curves were classified as follows: (1) Lenke 5?ve (mobile): main thoracic Cobb angle <15° and (2) Lenke 5+ve (stiff): main thoracic Cobb angle 15.0°–24.9°. This study was self-funded with no conflict of interest.Results
There were 43 Lenke 5?ve, 31 Lenke 5+ve, and 26 Lenke 6 curves analyzed. For Lenke 5?ve, >70% of thoracic segments were able to compensate when UIV were at T1–T8 and T12 and >50% at T9–T11. For Lenke 5+ve, >70% at T1–T6 and T12, 61.3% at T7, 38.7% at T8, 3.2% at T9, 6.5% at T10, and 22.6% at T11 were able to compensate. For Lenke 6 curve, >70% at T1–T6, 69.2% at T7, 19.2% at T8, 7.7% at T9, 0% at T10, 3.8% at T11, and 34.6% at T12 were able to compensate. There was a significant difference between Lenke 5–ve versus Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 5–ve versus Lenke 6 from T8 to T11. There were no significance differences between Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 6 curves from T1 to T11.Conclusions
The compensatory ability of the unfused thoracic segment of Lenke 5+ve curves was different from the Lenke 5–ve curves, and it demonstrated characteristics similar to the Lenke 6 curves. 相似文献7.
8.
9.
10.
《Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society》2022,30(7):973-986