Morning light treatment hastens the antidepressant effect of citalopram: a placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective in approximately 70% of patients with a major depressive episode, but therapeutic changes usually require 2 weeks of administration to become clinically relevant. Adjunct light therapy has been proposed to hasten the effects of drug treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of morning light therapy or placebo combined with citalopram in the treatment of patients affected by a major depressive episode without psychotic features. METHOD: Thirty inpatients (DSM-IV major depressive disorder [N = 21] and bipolar disorder [N = 9]) were treated with citalopram, 40 mg, and randomized in a 3:2 manner to receive 30 minutes of 400 lux green light treatment in the morning or placebo (exposure to a deactivated negative ion generator) during the first 2 weeks of drug treatment. Timing of light therapy was individually defined to obtain a 2-hour phase advance to morning light. Outcome was measured with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale every week, and with a Visual Analogue Scale 3 times a day during the first week. RESULTS: All outcome measures showed significantly (p <.05) better mood improvement in light-treated patients, resulting in faster responses to antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of citalopram and light treatment was more effective than citalopram and placebo in the treatment of major depression. With an optimized timing of administration, low-intensity light treatment significantly hastened and potentiated the effect of citalopram, thus providing the clinical psychiatrists with an augmenting strategy that was found effective and devoid of side effects.     

Effects of alpidem in anxious elderly outpatients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

The efficacy and safety of alpidem, a new anxiolytic imidazopyridine, were compared with those of placebo in anxious elderly patients (65-80 years) by means of a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Following a 7-day "placebo run-in," 40 anxious patients were randomized to receive either alpidem or placebo. Daily doses ranging from 75 to 150 mg (25-50 mg t.i.d.) were administered for 3 weeks. Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-X1), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were used on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21 for assessing efficacy. Psychomotor and mnesic performances were evaluated at the same time by means of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Grünberger's test for fine motor coordination, and the Hawie's test for immediate memory. Possible adverse events were also recorded during the five visits. The anxiolytic efficacy of alpidem was significantly (p < 0.01) superior to that of placebo in all the rating scales adopted. The anxiolytic action was clearly evident from day 7. For most of the patients the active dose was 25 mg t.i.d. No relevant adverse effects were observed in both groups. No impairment of psychomotor and mnesic performances could be observed in the alpidem group. Alpidem is a new interesting anxiolytic drug for anxious elderly patients because it appears remarkably safe and, at effective doses, it does not impair psychomotor performances and cognitive functions.     

Early antidepressant effect of memantine during augmentation of lamotrigine inadequate response in bipolar depression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Anand A, Gunn AD, Barkay G, Karne HS, Nurnberger JI, Mathew SJ, Ghosh S. Early antidepressant effect of memantine during augmentation of lamotrigine inadequate response in bipolar depression: a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial.
Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 64–70. © 2012 The Authors.
Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Background: Recent studies indicate that modulation of glutamate neurotransmission is associated with antidepressant response. Lamotrigine, an anticonvulsant which decreases presynaptic glutamate release, has been shown to be effective in the depressive phase of bipolar disorder (BD‐D); however, only 40–50% of patients have a full response. This pilot study investigated whether memantine, a low‐affinity N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist approved for Alzheimer’s disease, can augment the effects of lamotrigine. Methods: BD‐D outpatients in a major depressive episode on a stable dose of lamotrigine (100 mg or more) were randomized to either memantine (starting dose of 5 mg increased up to 20 mg over four weeks, then 20 mg stable dose from four to eight weeks) or matching pill placebo for eight weeks. Patients were rated on the 17‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and other behavioral measures weekly. Results: The eight‐week repeated‐measures mixed‐effect model for HDRS was not significant for memantine (n = 14) versus placebo (n = 15). Exploratory mixed‐effect analyses for the first four weeks, while the memantine dose was being titrated up every week, revealed a significant decrease in HDRS scores from baseline (p = 0.007). Conclusion: This proof‐of‐concept study failed to show a statistically significant benefit of memantine augmentation of lamotrigine for patients with BD‐D over eight weeks. However, memantine had an antidepressant effect early on in the treatment while its dose was being titrated up. Larger placebo‐controlled studies are needed to ascertain optimal timing and dosing for memantine augmentation of lamotrigine in BD‐D.     

Mirtazapine in essential tremor: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

We sought to determine whether mirtazapine is safe and well-tolerated as a treatment for essential tremor (ET). We studied mirtazapine in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 17 ET patients. Patients were started with 15 mg per day of either mirtazapine or placebo for 1 week and the dose was escalated weekly until the targeted dose of 45 mg per day was achieved. This dose was maintained for 2 weeks. Tremor was assessed at baseline and after 14 days of 45 mg of mirtazapine or placebo. There was a minimum washout period of 14 days between the two arms of the study. Tremor assessments included global improvement, Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39. Patient global improvement ratings indicated that in the placebo condition 12 patients were unchanged and 1 patient was mildly improved. In the mirtazapine condition, 10 patients were unchanged, 2 were moderately improved and 1 was markedly improved. There was no significant improvement with mirtazapine or placebo compared to baseline as measured by the Tremor Rating Scale. Adverse effects were more common in the mirtazapine group and included drowsiness, confusion, dry mouth, weight gain, polyuria, itching, nausea, gait and balance problems, blurred vision, and bad taste. We conclude that the majority of the ET patients do not benefit from mirtazapine. Mirtazapine has significant adverse effects and should be used cautiously in ET patients.     

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial of ramipril in McArdle's disease

McArdle's disease causes limitation in exercise capacity as well as disability, the severity of which has been associated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion (I)/deletion (D) haplotype-patients with the genotype associated with higher ACE activity show the most severe phenotype. Modulation of ACE activity through the use of inhibitors may thus positively affect disease expression. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy of an ACE inhibitor (2.5 mg ramipril) in 8 patients with McArdle's disease. End-points were changes in parameters of exercise physiology (cycloergometer and muscle 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy), quality of life (QoL) according to the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and disability according to the World Health Organization-Disability Assessment Scale II (WHO-DAS II). Patients had lower QoL and higher disability than controls. Measures of exercise physiology were not changed by ramipril in the whole group, but treatment induced higher peak VO2 (P = 0.017) in ACE D/D patients, yet not in I/D patients. Treatment significantly improved disability (P < 0.05). McArdle's disease is a disabling condition affecting patients' QoL. Treatment with ramipril improves disability and modifies exercise physiology only in D/D patients, raising the possibility of a differential haplotype-linked sensitivity to the treatment.     

A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of indinavir in patients with ALS

There is some evidence of retroviral infection in ALS. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of indinavir in ALS was performed to assess safety and efficacy trends. Nephrolithiasis and gastrointestinal side effects were frequent with indinavir treatment. Group differences in the rate of decline were not significant between the groups for the ALS Functional Rating Scale (p = 0.36) or for the secondary variables. The toxicity and negative efficacy trends discourage further indinavir trials in ALS.     

Viqualine in resistant depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Viqualine dihydrochloride is a new molecule, which possesses strong serotonin reuptake inhibition properties and, at the same time, diazepam-like actions, such as [3H]-diazepam-binding inhibition and antipunishment effect. The drug was administered double-blindly to 10 patients suffering from major depression resistant to previous treatments with tricyclics. The comparison group (10 patients) received placebo. Lorazepam (10 mg/day) was also given to both groups. Viqualine proved to be significantly superior to placebo in the 4th week of treatment on all the three rating scales which were used. Tolerability of viqualine was good both objectively and on subjective grounds.     

Olanzapine in the treatment of developmental stuttering: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Stuttering is a speech disorder that affects one-percent of all adults and much has been learned recently of its neurologic correlates. Stuttering has been associated with excessive cerebral activity of the neurotransmitter, dopamine. Pharmacologic research has suggested that older generation dopamine antagonist (i.e. "typical antipsychotic") medications improve stuttering symptoms, but are associated with poorly tolerated adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine, a novel dopamine antagonist (or "atypical antipsychotic"), versus placebo in the treatment of adult developmental stuttering. Twenty-four adults who stutter participated in a twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at two separate sites. Subjects received either olanzapine (2.5 mg titrated to 5 mg) or matching placebo. Subjects were rated on an objective measure of stuttering severity (SSI-3), a clinician based global impression (CGI), and a subject-rated self-assessment of stuttering (SSS). Subjects were also monitored for potential side-effects. Twenty-three of the twenty-four subjects enrolled in the trial successfully completed the full course of the study. Olanzapine was statistically superior to placebo on the three ratings of stuttering severity, the SSI-3, the CGI and SSS (p < .05). Olanzapine is a promising medication for the treatment of stuttering and further research is warranted.     

Gabapentin for essential tremor: a multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder that often becomes refractory to conventional pharmacologic management. Open-label studies suggest that gabapentin is efficacious for ET, but the results of controlled trials have been mixed. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin in ET, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial evaluating two doses (1800 mg per day and 3600 mg per day; N = 25). Patients on other ET medications were maintained on their concurrent medications for 3 months prior to study initiation and throughout the study. Twenty patients (mean age, 69.9 +/- 6.1 yrs) completed the study. Overall, patient global assessments (p <0.05), observed tremor scores (p <0.005), water pouring scores (p <0.05), and activities of daily living scores (p <0.005) significantly improved. Accelerometry scores, spirographs, and investigator global impression scores did not improve. The results were similar for high and low doses. Statistical regression models did not demonstrate any significant predictors for response. Gabapentin may be effective in some cases of ET.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of antidepressant augmentation with mirtazapine.

BACKGROUND: A previous pilot study of open-label mirtazapine augmentation conducted by the authors in 20 depressed patients yielded a 55% response rate at week 4. A double-blind controlled trial was undertaken to further elucidate the efficacy of this intervention. METHODS: 26 adult outpatients with persistent major depression despite adequate antidepressant monotherapy were randomized to receive 4 weeks of mirtazapine or placebo augmentation. Mirtazapine was begun at 15 mg at bedtime, with possible titration to 30 mg at bedtime per physician's discretion after week 1. RESULTS: Categorical positive response rate at end point was 64% for active drug and 20% for placebo. Remission rates were 45.4% and 13.3% for active drug and placebo groups, respectively, Mirtazapine demonstrated statistically significant superiority to placebo on most major outcome measures, and was associated with improvement in overall functioning and quality of life. There were no significant group differences with regard to emergent side effects, weight change, or serum concentrations of primary antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: Mirtazapine appears safe and effective for short-term antidepressant augmentation.     

Oral S-adenosylmethionine in depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Methylation has been implicated in the etiology of psychiatric illness. Parenteral S-adenosylmethionine, a methyl group donor, has been shown to be an effective antidepressant. The authors studied the antidepressant effect of oral S-adenosylmethionine in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for 15 inpatients with major depression. The results suggest that oral S-adenosylmethionine is a safe, effective antidepressant with few side effects and a rapid onset of action. S-Adenosylmethionine induced mania in a patient with no history of mania. S-Adenosylmethionine may be useful for patients who cannot tolerate tricyclic anti-depressants. These findings support a role for methylation in the pathophysiology of depression.     

Fluvoxamine in the treatment of demented elderly patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

The efficacy of fluvoxamine on cognitive functioning and behavioral changes was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 46 elderly demented patients. The patients had a DSM-III diagnosis of primary degenerative dementia or multi-infarct dementia and were aged greater than or equal to 65 years. Twenty-two patients were given 150 mg fluvoxamine per day and 24 received placebo tablets; 14 and 15 patients, respectively, completed 6 weeks of treatment. Within treatments, there were no significant changes in median scores on neuropsychological tests (picture recall and recognition, trail making and finger tapping) or the GBS scale scores (degrees of dementia) or GBS subscale score (clinical profiles, including symptoms common in dementia, motor, emotional and intellectual functioning). Between treatments, the median changes in psychometric test scores did not differ significantly. However, within and between treatments, there were trends favoring fluvoxamine on symptoms common in dementia (confusion, irritability, anxiety, fear-panic, mood level and restlessness). In conclusion, the study does not support the hypothesis that fluvoxamine improves cognitive functioning or behavioral changes in elderly dementia patients.     

A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin (Lyrica) in the treatment of essential tremor.

We performed a pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin (PGB, Lyrica), an antiepileptic agent, in treating essential tremor (ET). Twenty two patients with ET were randomly assigned to receive PGB or placebo. PGB was initiated at 50 mg/day and was escalated by 75 mg/day every 4 days to a maximum dose of 600 mg/day. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale. There was a significant reduction in tremor amplitude in the PGB group compared with the placebo group, as measured by accelerometry, at a mean dose of 286.76+/-100.05 mg/day. Action tremor limb scores on the FTM also improved in the PGB group compared with the placebo group (P-value for multilevel modeling=0.04). PGB was fairly well tolerated, with about one-third of patients dropping out of the study because of adverse events. PGB provided significant improvements in accelerometry and in action tremor limb scores on the FTM. However, larger studies are needed to further evaluate the potential effect of PGB on ET.