Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Conformal Treatment Plans in Gastric Cancer Radiotherapy

Background: Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is accepted as standard treatment for stage IB-IV, M0 gastric cancer. Radiotherapy (RT) planning of gastric cancer is important because of the low radiation tolerance of surrounding critical organs. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric aspects of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) treatment plans, with the twin aims of evaluating the adequacy of 2D planning fields on coverage of planning target volume (PTV) and 3D conformal plans for both covering PTV and reducingthe normal tissue doses. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients with stage II-IV gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy using 3DRT. For each patient, a second 2D treatment plan was generated. The two techniques were compared for target volume coverage and dose to normal tissues using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Results: 3DRT provides more adequate coverage of the target volume. Comparative DVHs for the left kidney and spinal cord demonstrate lower radiation doses with the 3D technique.Conclusions: 3DRT produced better dose distributions and reduced radiation doses to left kidney and spinal cord compared to the 2D technique. For this reason it can be predicted that 3DRT will result in better tumor control and less normal tissue complications.     

Three-dimensional treatment planning for para-aortic node irradiation in patients with cervical cancer

Three-dimensional treatment planning has been used by four cooperating centers to prepare and analyze multiple treatment plans on two cervix cancer patients. One patient had biopsy-proven and CT-demonstrable metastasis to the para-aortic nodes, while the other was at high risk for metastatic involvement of para-aortic nodes. Volume dose distributions were analyzed, and an attempt was made to define the role of 3-D treatment planning to the para-aortic region, where moderate to high doses (50-66 Gy) are required to sterilize microscopic and gross metastasis. Plans were prepared using the 3-D capabilities for tailoring fields to the target volumes, but using standard field arrangements (3-D standard), and with full utilization of the 3-D capabilities (3-D unconstrained). In some but not all 3-D unconstrained plans, higher doses were delivered to the large nodal volume and to the volume containing gross nodal disease than in plans analyzed but not prepared with full 3-D capability (3-D standard). The small bowel was the major dose limiting organ. Its tolerance would have been exceeded in all plans which prescribed 66 Gy to the gross nodal mass, although some reduction in small bowel near-maximum dose was achieved in the 3-D unconstrained plans. All plans were able to limit doses to other normal organs to tolerance levels or less, with significant reductions seen in doses to spinal cord, kidneys, and large bowel in the 3-D unconstrained plans, as compared to the 3-D standard plans. A high probability of small bowel injury was detected in one of four 3-D standard plans prescribed to receive 50 Gy to the large para-aortic nodal volume; the small bowel dose was reduced to an acceptable level in the corresponding 3-D unconstrained plan. An optimum beam energy for treating this site was not identified, with plans using 4, 6, 10, 15, 18, and 25 MV photons all being equally acceptable. Attempts to deliver moderate or high doses (50-66 Gy) to this region should be made only after careful analysis of the plan with techniques similar to those employed in this study.     

Four-dimensional stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative planning study

In this study we sought to assess the potential of the respiratory tumor tracking system of the CyberKnife to administer 3 fractions of 15 Gy in the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The CyberKnife plans were compared to those developed for 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3-D CRT) administering 20 fractions of 3 Gy based on a slow CT. Ten patients with stage I NSCLC, who were previously treated with 3-D CRT, were re-planned with the CyberKnife treatment planning system. In the 3-D CRT plan, the planning target volume (PTV) included the gross tumor volume (GTV)(slow) and a 15-mm margin, whereas in the CyberKnife plan the margin was 8 mm. The physical doses from both treatment plans were converted to normalized total doses (NTD) using the linear quadratic model with an alpha/beta(tumor) of 10 Gy and alpha/beta(organs at risk (OAR)) of 3 Gy. The average minimal and mean doses administered to the PTV with the CyberKnife and 3-D CRT were 93 and 115.8 Gy and 61 and 66 Gy, respectively (p<0.0001). The mean V(20) of the CyberKnife and 3-D CRT plans were 8.2% and 6.8%, respectively (p=0.124). Both plans complied with the OAR constraints. In conclusion, 4-dimensional stereotactic radiotherapy can increase the minimal and mean biological dose with 51% and 75%, in comparison with 3-D CRT without significantly increasing the V(20), respectively.     

Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer

PURPOSE: To implement intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for primary nasopharynx cancer and to compare this technique with conventional treatment methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1998 and June 2000, 23 patients with primary nasopharynx cancer were treated with IMRT delivered with dynamic multileaf collimation. Treatments were designed using an inverse planning algorithm, which accepts dose and dose-volume constraints for targets and normal structures. The IMRT plan was compared with a traditional plan consisting of phased lateral fields and a three-dimensional (3D) plan consisting of a combination of lateral fields and a 3D conformal plan. RESULTS: Mean planning target volume (PTV) dose increased from 67.9 Gy with the traditional plan, to 74.6 Gy and 77.3 Gy with the 3D and IMRT plans, respectively. PTV coverage improved in the parapharyngeal region, the skull base, and the medial aspects of the nodal volumes using IMRT and doses to all normal structures decreased compared to the other treatment approaches. Average maximum cord dose decreased from 49 Gy with the traditional plan, to 44 Gy with the 3D plan and 34.5 Gy with IMRT. With the IMRT plan, the volume of mandible and temporal lobes receiving more than 60 Gy decreased by 10-15% compared to the traditional and 3D plans. The mean parotid gland dose decreased with IMRT, although it was not low enough to preserve salivary function. CONCLUSION: Lower normal tissue doses and improved target coverage, primarily in the retropharynx, skull base, and nodal regions, were achieved using IMRT. IMRT could potentially improve locoregional control and toxicity at current dose levels or facilitate dose escalation to further enhance locoregional control.     

An evaluation of two techniques for beam intensity modulation in patients irradiated for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

In locally advanced lung cancer, the use of high dose radiotherapy (RT) and/or concurrent chemo-RT is associated with significant pulmonary and esophageal toxicity. Despite a 3D conformal RT technique and the omission of elective mediastinal fields, three (of ten) patients with inoperable stage 3 NSCLC who were treated with induction chemotherapy (carboplatin-paclitaxel) followed by RT to 70 Gy, developed symptomatic radiation pneumonitis. In this planning study, the actual treatment plans of all ten patients were compared to plans derived using two beam intensity-modulated (BIM) techniques, for which similar geometrical beam setup parameters were used. In the first technique (BF-BIM), cranial and caudal boost fields were applied in order to allow field length reduction. The second technique (C-BIM) utilised 3-D missing-tissue compensators for all radiation beams. Both BIM techniques resulted in a significant sparing of critical normal tissues and the C-BIM technique was superior in all cases. When compared to the actual RT technique used for treatment, a reduction of 8.1+/-4.7% (1 S.D.) was observed in the mean lung dose for the BF-BIM plan, vs. 20.3+/-5.8% (1 S.D.) for the C-BIM plan. Similar reductions were observed in the percentage of the total lung volume exceeding 20 Gy (V(20)) for these techniques. BIM techniques appear to be a promising tool for enabling radiation dose-escalation and/or intensive concurrent chemo-RT in inoperable lung cancer.     

Potential benefits of using cardiac gated images to reduce the dose to the left anterior descending coronary during radiotherapy of left breast and internal mammary nodes

PurposeTo assess the benefits of using cardiac gated images for treatment planning of breast and internal mammary nodes.Patients and methodsInspiration breath hold computed tomography (CT) series acquired at prospectively gated diastolic phase were used for planning. Three different techniques were compared. Technique A used tangents and an internal mammary nodes field covering the three first inter-rib spaces; technique B used an extended internal mammary nodes including part of the medial breast in junction with tangential fields; the 3^rd technique used helical tomotherapy. For each technique, two treatment plans were performed: one plan (plan-01) where mean dose and V₂₅ to the heart were considered for plan evaluation and a second plan (plan-02) where the irradiation of the left anterior descending artery was minimized.ResultsV₂₅ to the heart was found to be less than 5% for all six plans. Mean doses to the heart were within 4.8 to 7.2 Gy. By attempting to lower the dose to the left anterior descending artery, heart D_mean was decreased by 20–30% for the two techniques A and B while being unchanged for tomotherapy. Regarding target coverage, there was no marked difference between plans where only heart dose was considered (plans-01) and plans where the left anterior descending artery dose was minimized (plans-02). When the left anterior descending artery dose was part of plan evaluation, D_mean to the left anterior descending artery could be decreased by 24, 19 and 9% for techniques A, B and tomotherapy respectively. The three techniques exposed segments of the left coronary to different levels of dose.ConclusionThis study showed that evaluation of the dose to the left anterior descending artery coronary may change the treatment strategy. Cardiac gated images without IV contrast permitted a good visualization of the coronaries in order to optimize the dose on these structures. In addition to heart V_25, the dose to the coronaries should be included in prospective studies on radiotherapy related heart toxicity in association with all additional risk factors.     

A treatment planning study using non-coplanar static fields and coplanar arcs for whole breast radiotherapy of patients with concave geometry.

PURPOSE: A treatment planning study was performed to evaluate the performance of new radiotherapy techniques based on non-coplanar multiple fields or on dynamic conformal arcs for early stage breast treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT datasets of 7 different patients that were deemed unsuitable for tangential beam treatment due to a large volume of lung in the treatment fields were used as input for the study. Standard tangential field plans and inversely modulated IMRT plans were used as benchmark to evaluate performances of conformal plans with 3 non-coplanar fields (3F-NC), with 2 short dynamic conformal arcs (2-Arc) or hybrid plans with one static conformal field and one dynamic conformal arc (P-Arc). All plans were designed to achieve the higher target coverage and minimum ipsilateral lung involvement depending on the planning technique with a key objective to avoid involvement of the contralateral breast. The following planning objectives were selected. For PTV: D(1%) (maximum significant dose) lower than 110% and D(99%) (minimum significant dose) higher than 90%. For the ipsilateral lung a mean dose lower than 15 Gy and/or a volume receiving more than 20 Gy lower than 22%. For contralateral breast, all techniques but IMRT were set to have no beam impinging this organ at risk, while for IMRT plans were further designed to keep the mean dose lower than 5 Gy and to minimise the volume receiving a dose higher than 70% of the prescribed dose. RESULTS: P-Arc resulted to be on average a better technique, as it provides a PTV dose distribution highly conformal (Conformity index 1.45), homogeneous (D(5%)-D(95%)=15.6%), with adequate coverage (V(90%)=96.4%) and a limited involvement of the ipsilateral lung (MLD approximately 9 Gy, V(5 Gy) approximately 36%, NTCP<2%) when compared to four other treatment techniques. 3F-NC presented similar but slightly worse performances on target: Conformity index 1.57, D(5%)-D(95%)=18.1%, V(90%)=95.7%). 3F-NC on ipsilateral lung resulted as the P-Arc. The tangential approach, the 2-Arc or the IMRT techniques, resulted to be inferior to the previous in either conformality (tangentials), ipsilateral lung sparing (tangentials, 2-Arc and IMRT) and in contralateral or healthy tissue involvement (IMRT). CONCLUSION: For early stage breast cancer when high sparing of lung tissues is required and no involvement of contralateral breast is allowed, the P-Arc or the 3F-NC techniques might be recommended in terms of dosimetric expectations.     

Comparison of treatment plans using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning for paranasal sinus carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans using traditional 3-field technique, 3D-CRT planning, and inverse planning IMRT were developed for a case of paranasal sinus cancer requiring adjuvant radiotherapy. Plans were compared with respect to dose conformality, dose-volume histograms, doses to critical normal tissues, and ease of treatment delivery. RESULTS: The inverse-planned IMRT technique was more conformal around the tumor target volume than conventional techniques. The dose-volume histograms demonstrated significantly better critical normal-tissue sparing with the IMRT plans, while able to deliver a minimum dose of 60 Gy to the clinical tumor volume and 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume. Acute toxicities in our analysis were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT planning provided improved tumor target coverage when compared to 3D-CRT treatment planning. There was significant sparing of optic structures and other normal tissues, including the brainstem. Inverse planning IMRT provided the best treatment for all paranasal sinus carcinomas, but required stringent immobilization criteria. Further studies are needed to establish the true clinical advantage of this modality.     

Target coverage in head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a comparison between conventional and conformal techniques

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We designed a comparative planning study aimed at quantifying the advantages of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over the conventional 3-field technique (3FT) and a 5-field conformal technique (5FCT) for head and neck (HN) cancer. METHODS: We selected 9 patients treated at our institution with curative radiotherapy for a HN cancer. For all cases 4 plans were generated: 2 plans using the "standard" techniques (3FT and 5FCT), a third plan using IMRT, and a fourth "mixed" plan using IMRT followed by a conventional boost. RESULTS: Our study confirmed literature data on the ability of IMRT to significantly decrease the dose received by organs at risk, compared with previous techniques. Target coverage was systematically better with 5FCT and IMRT than with 3FT. However, the increase in coverage of both PTV2 and PTV1 was only about 3-5% and this was achieved at the price of a similar increase in maximum dose (D1%). Volumetric parameters (V100%, V95%) were much more sensitive in detecting the improvement with IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of target coverage attained by IMRT, as compared with conventional and conformal techniques, might be overestimated by data currently available in the medical literature. If treatment with conventional techniques is planned using all tools provided by currently available fully 3-D planning systems, excellent target coverage can be obtained.     

Three-dimensional photon treatment planning in carcinoma of the larynx

The role of three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning in the definitive treatment of carcinoma of the larynx with radiation was evaluated at four institutions as part of an NCI contract. A total of 30 different treatment approaches were devised for two patients with larynx cancer. CT scans were obtained for both patients and various treatment planning tools were employed to optimize beam arrangements and to evaluate the resulting dose distribution. The effect on dose distribution of a number of factors was also examined: 1) the use of dose calculation algorithms which correct for tissue inhomogeneities, 2) the variation of the CT numbers used for inhomogeneity corrections to simulate inaccuracies in the knowledge of the CT numbers, and 3) the modification of beam energy. A multitude of data was used in plan evaluation and a numerical score was given to each plan to estimate the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probability. We found 3-D treatment planning to be of potential value in optimizing treatment plans in larynx cancer. Improved target coverage was achieved when complete information describing 3-D geometry of the anatomy was utilized. In some cases, the treatment planning tools employed, such as the beam's eye view, helped devise novel beam arrangements which were useful alternatives to standard techniques. We found little effect of change in CT number on dose distributions. A comparison between dose distributions calculated with tissue inhomogeneity corrections to those calculated without this correction showed little difference. We did find some improvement in the dose to the primary tumor volume at lower beam energies, but with an increased larynx volume potentially receiving doses above tolerance.     

Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin’s disease,and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of beam orientation optimization and the role of virtual volumes (VVs) aimed at protecting adjacent organs at risk (OARs), and to compare various intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) setups with conventional treatment with anterior and posterior fields and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with mediastinal masses in Hodgkin's disease were treated with combined modality therapy (three to six cycles of adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine [ABVD] before radiation treatment). Contouring and treatment planning were performed with Somavision and CadPlan Helios (Varian Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The gross tumor volume was determined according to the prechemotherapy length and the postchemotherapy width of the mediastinal tumor mass. A 10-mm isotropic margin was added for the planning target volume (PTV). Because dose constraints assigned to OARs led to unsatisfactory PTV coverage, VVs were designed for each patient to protect adjacent OARs. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy to the PTV, delivered according to guidelines from International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report No. 50. Five different IMRT treatment plans were compared with conventional treatment and 3D-CRT. RESULTS: Beam orientation was important with respect to the amount of irradiated normal tissues. The best compromise in terms of PTV coverage and protection of normal tissues was obtained with five equally spaced beams (5FEQ IMRT plan) using dose constraints assigned to VVs. When IMRT treatment plans were compared with conventional treatment and 3D-CRT, dose conformation with IMRT was significantly better, with greater protection of the heart, coronary arteries, esophagus, and spinal cord. The lungs and breasts in women received a slightly higher radiation dose with IMRT compared with conventional treatments. The greater volume of normal tissue receiving low radiation doses could be a cause for concern. CONCLUSIONS: The 5FEQ IMRT plan with dose constraints assigned to the PTV and VV allows better dose conformation than conventional treatment and 3D-CRT, notably with better protection of the heart and coronary arteries. Of concern is the "spreading out" of low doses to the rest of the patient's body.     

3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

To assess the usefulness of proton beams for treatment of patients with rectal cancer, we have performed comparative 3D treatment planning for proton beam and x-ray beam therapy. Three common x-ray techniques (AP-PA, 3-field, and 4-field box), a proton beam only plan, and a proton boost plan were compared. The plan which would have been treated without the aid of the 3D planning system was also simulated. Dose distributions were analyzed and dose-volume histograms computed for the target volumes and critical normal tissues. Analyses of these plans demonstrate that the proton beam techniques reduce the volume of small bowel irradiated. This may allow higher doses to be delivered to the tumor, with a probable increase in local control, or a reduction in normal tissue complications probability. All the plans developed with the 3D planning system treated significantly less bowel than the one planned without it.     

IMRT for postoperative treatment of gastric cancer: covering large target volumes in the upper abdomen: a comparison of a step-and-shoot and an arc therapy approach

PURPOSE: Data from the randomized Intergroup Trial 116 suggest effectiveness of adjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Late toxicity, however, especially with respect to the kidneys, may pose significant longtime problems. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may reduce toxicity to organs at risk. To evaluate the relative merits of different IMRT approaches, we performed a plan comparison between a step-and-shoot class solution and an AP-PA setup, a conventional box technique and the Peacock tomotherapy approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomographies and structure data from 15 patients who had been treated postoperatively for advanced (T3/T4/N+) gastric cancer at our department formed the basis of our plan comparison study. For each patient data set, 5 plans or plan combinations (conventional 3D plan, AP-PA plan, step-and-shoot IMRT, tomotherapy with 1-cm or 2-cm collimation) were chosen, and evaluation was performed for a total dose of 45 Gy delivered as the median dose to the target volume for each plan or plan combination. RESULTS: Median kidney dose generated from the IMRT plans is reduced individually by >50% for the kidney with the highest exposure (usually the left kidney) from 20 to 30 Gy with conventional 3D planning down to values between 8 and 10 Gy for IMRT. On average, median dose to the right kidney is the same for the conventional box technique and IMRT (between 8 and 10 Gy) but lower for the AP-PA technique. In 3 patients, kidney dose might have been ablative for both kidneys with both the AP-PA technique and the box technique, whereas it was acceptable with IMRT. Median dose to the liver was subcritical with all modalities but lowest with AP-PA fields. Differences between step-and-shoot IMRT and tomotherapy plans are small when compared to the differences between IMRT plans and conventional conformal 3D plans. For some patients, however, their body and target diameters obviate treatment with tomotherapy. Treatment time for the step-and-shoot approach and for tomotherapy with 2-cm collimation can be kept <20 min. CONCLUSIONS: For postoperative radiotherapy of advanced gastric cancer, step-and-shoot IMRT as well as tomotherapy can deliver efficient doses to target volumes while delivering dose to the kidneys in a fashion that is different from a conventional technique and is clearly advantageous in a small number of patients. An advantage for the majority of patients is likely with the normal tissue complication probability data presented in this series, but, given the uncertainty of the reaction of the kidney to inhomogeneous dose distributions, cannot be considered unequivocal at the moment. Different technical limitations apply to the different IMRT techniques. The choice of approach is therefore determined by departmental circumstances.     

应用4D-CT技术确定肝癌内靶体积及相关剂量学研究

背景与目的:由于肝脏肿瘤的位移受呼吸运动的影响显著,三维适形放射治疗(three-dimensionaI confomal radiotherapy,3D CRT)难以准确定位靶区.本研究应用4D-CT技术确定个体化肝癌内靶体积(internal target volume,ITV),比较3D计划与4D计划的计划靶体积(planning target volume,PTV)及相关剂量学差异,并评价4D-CT的优势.方法:选择7例原发性肝癌患者,行4D-CT门控扫描,在10个相位的CT图像中分别勾画大体肿瘤体积(gross tumor volume,GTV)和临床靶体积(clinical target volume,CTV).在20%呼吸时相CT图像中利用三维治疗计划系统根据PTV-3D、PTV-4D为每例患者设计两套放疗计划:3D计划与4D计划.PTV-3D由CTV外扩常规的安全边界得到;PTV-4D由10个时相的CTV融合形成的ITV-4D外扩摆位边界(SM)得到.两套计划的处方剂量、射野方式均相同.比较两套计划中靶区体积、靶区与危及器官的剂量学、正常组织并发症概率的差异.结果:PTV-3D、PTV-4D的体积分别为(417.60±197.70)cm3、(331.90±183.10)cm3,后者体积减少20.50%(12.60%～34.40%);两者靶区覆盖率与剂量分布均匀性无显著性差异;4D计划中危及器官(肝、肾、胃、小肠)的受照剂量均较3D计划降低,以肝最为显著.肝V30、V40分别由38.77%、27.32%降至33.59%、22.62%;正常肝平均剂量由24.13 Gy下降为21.50 Gy;肝并发症概率由21.57%下降为15.86%;在不增加正常组织并发症的前提下,4D计划的处方剂量可由(50.57±1.51)Gy提升至(54.86±2.79)Gy,平均提高9.72%(4.00%～16.00%).结论:3D计划存在遗漏靶区或过度扩大靶区的缺陷.应用4D-CT技术可在3D CRT的基础上准确定位肝癌靶区,进一步减少正常组织的受照剂量,并提升靶区剂量.     

N2-3期鼻咽癌下颈锁骨上区照射中间设置不同宽度铅挡块的剂量学研究

背景与目的:N2-3期鼻咽癌常规照射时,需设置中间挡铅的前切线野照射下颈锁骨上淋巴引流区,目前对于中间铅挡块宽度仍有不同的做法,本研究通过应用三维治疗计划系统(three-dimensional treatment planning system,3D-TPS)对前切线野照射下颈锁骨上区的剂量分布进行分析.探讨合适宽度的铅挡块.方法:选取初治N2-3期鼻咽癌患者10例,采用3D-TPS设计照射方案.每例患者均采用逐步缩野照射技术.下颈锁骨上区均设置单前切线野,前40 Gy中间分别采用铅挡0 cm(A方案)、2.1 cm(B方案)、2.5 cm(C方案)、3.0 cm(D方案),之后中间均挡3.0 cm 4种方案.每例患者的4种方案照射剂量均相同.比较4种照射方案的靶区及主要危及器官的受照体积和剂量.结果:(1)4种方案下颈锁骨上亚临床病灶区(PTV50a)的高剂量区覆盖率(V95、V90)比较:A方案(82.44%、87.89%)优于B方案(78.21%、84.03%)、C方案(77.10%、82.68%)、D方案(73.80%、77.50%)(P＜0.05);B方案、C方案好于D方案(P＜0.05);B方案与C方案比较无统计学意义(P＞0.05).而对于原发灶大体肿瘤区(PTVnx)、颈部转移淋巴结(PTVnd)、原发灶周围高危区(PTVnx60)、转移淋巴结周围高危区(PTVnd60)及环状软骨以上的亚临床病灶区(PTV50b)的V95、V90,4种方案之间比较差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).(2)4种方案脊髓、喉的受照剂量无统计学意义;甲状腺、食管、气管的受照剂量(D50):A方案(49.47、44.52、44.18 Gy)高于B方案(41.95、8.41、10.16 Gy)、C方案(38.73、7.03、8.55 Gy)、D方案(26.82、5.63、7.60 Gy)(P＜0.05);B方案、C方案均高于D方案(P＜0.05);B方案、C方案比较无统计学意义(P＞0.05).(3)正常组织并发症发生率(NTCP)的比较:甲状腺的NTCP,A方案(7.9%)高于B方案(4.8%)、C方案(4.3%)、D方案(3.0%)(P＜0.05);B方案、C方案均高于D方案(P＜0.05);B方案、C方案之间比较无统计学意义(P＞0.05).其余主要危及器官的NTCP,4种方案比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论:在不明显增加主要危及器官受照剂量的情况下,A方案有最优的下颈锁骨上区亚临床病灶高剂量区覆盖率,D方案最差;行下颈锁骨上区照射时,我们推荐前40 Gy中间不设铅挡块,之后选用个体化铅挡块.对于头颈部摆位误差小的单位,建议采用铅挡块宽度≥2.1 cm、≤2.5 cm.     

Three-dimensional photon treatment planning for carcinoma of the nasopharynx

The role of 3-D treatment planning for carcinoma of the nasopharynx was assessed in a four institution study. Two patients were worked up and had an extensive number of CT scans on which target volumes and normal tissues were defined. Treatment planning was then performed using state of the art dose planning systems for these patients to assess the value of the new technology. In general, it was demonstrated that multi-field conformal plans could achieve good tumor dose coverage, while at the same time reducing normal tissue doses, compared to standard treatment planning techniques. The role of inhomogeneity corrections, beam energy, and the use of CT vs. simulation films for defining target volumes were also discussed. In addition, techniques to evaluate 3-D plans for the nasopharynx were considered, and some analysis of this problem is presented in this paper.     

Improvements in target coverage and reduced spinal cord irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with carcinoma of the thyroid gland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: External beam radiotherapy for thyroid carcinoma poses a significant technical challenge as the target volume lies close to or surrounds the spinal cord. The potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to improve the dose distributions was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A planning study was performed on patients with thyroid carcinoma. Plans were generated to irradiate the thyroid bed alone or to treat the thyroid bed and the loco-regional lymph nodes in two phases. Conventional plans with minimal beam shaping were compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and inverse-planned IMRT plans to assess target coverage and normal tissue sparing. IMRT techniques were optimized to find the minimum number of equispaced beams required to achieve the clinical benefit and a concomitant boost technique was explored. RESULTS: For the thyroid bed alone and the thyroid bed plus loco-regional lymph nodes, conventional and conformal techniques produced low minimum doses to the planning target volume (PTV) if spinal cord tolerance was respected. 3DCRT reduced the irradiated volume of normal tissue (P=0.01). IMRT plans achieved the goal dose to the PTV (P<0.01) and also reduced the spinal cord maximum dose (P<0.01). IMRT, using a concomitant boost technique, produced better target coverage than a two-phase technique. For both the two-phase and concomitant boost techniques, IMRT plans with seven and five equispaced fields produced similar dose distributions to nine fields, but three fields were significantly worse. CONCLUSIONS: 3DCRT reduced normal tissue irradiation compared to conventional techniques, but did not improve PTV or spinal cord doses. IMRT improved the PTV coverage and reduced the spinal cord dose. A simultaneous integrated boost technique with five equispaced fields produced the best dose distribution. IMRT should reduce the risk of myelopathy or may allow dose escalation in patients with thyroid cancer.