Distinguishing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease with CMV nucleic acid assays

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among transplant recipients. Molecular assays have been developed for the detection and quantification of CMV nucleic acid. In evaluating the clinical utility of these assays, correlations with clinical outcome are essential. The Amplicor CMV Monitor and NucliSens CMV pp67 tests were compared to the CMV antigenemia assay for 45 transplant recipients and 1 patient with Wegener's granulomatosis. Twenty-three patients remained antigenemia negative throughout the monitoring period, none of whom developed CMV disease. In this patient group, both the Amplicor and NucliSens assays showed very high specificity; only 1 of the 324 specimens assayed by NucliSens and none of the 303 specimens assayed by Amplicor were positive. Twenty-three patients were antigenemia positive during the monitoring period, 12 of whom developed 13 episodes of symptomatic CMV disease. In this patient group, the NucliSens assay was positive at or before the development of symptoms in 12 of the 13 episodes of CMV disease. All eight patients with symptomatic CMV disease who were tested by the Amplicor assay were positive at or before the development of disease. For the 11 asymptomatic patients, the NucliSens assay was positive less frequently than the antigenemia or Amplicor assays. The NucliSens assay was more likely to be positive at higher antigenemia or viral load levels. Both the NucliSens and Amplicor assays appear to have clinical utility in monitoring patients for CMV disease.     

Comparison of two quantitative CMV PCR tests, Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor and TaqMan assay, and pp65-antigenemia assay in the determination of viral loads from peripheral blood of organ transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative PCR assays have become the most common methods in the determination of viral load during cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of transplant patients. However, usually these tests are still quite time-consuming and labor-intensive which diminishes their utility of these tests in routine diagnostic laboratories. Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a quantitative CMV PCR test which is time-saving and easy to perform for the detection and monitoring of CMV infection of transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: The quantitative real time CMV PCR assay using TaqMan chemistry and an automated sample preparation system, MagNA Pure LC, was developed. The designed quantitative CMV test was compared to commercial quantitative PCR test, Cobas Amplicor Monitor, in the determination of CMV DNA loads in plasma samples of liver and kidney transplant patients. The results were also correlated with the CMV pp65-antigenemia test. The clinical material of 270 blood specimens of transplant patients were tested using these two PCR methods and pp65-antigenemia test in parallel. Plasma samples were used for PCR assays and leucocytes for the antigenemia test. RESULTS: The TaqMan assay described was easy to perform, it was rapid (3-4 h) and hands-on time needed for performing the test was short. The detection limit of the assay was 250 copies/ml (cps/ml) plasma and the linear range up to 25,000,000 cps/ml. TaqMan assay was the most sensitive test detecting 92% of the CMV positive findings. Cobas Monitor detected 80% and pp65 test 88% of the positive findings. The correlations between TaqMan and antigenemia assays, and between Cobas Amplicor and antigenemia were statistically significant and high, R = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) and R = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Also correlation between two PCR tests was statistically significant (R = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Of the 27 patient studied, 19 demonstrated CMV antigenemia and DNAemia in their blood during the post transplant monitoring. Thirteen of these patients developed a symptomatic CMV infection and were treated with ganciclovir. The peak viral loads of symptomatic patients were statistically higher by all three methods than those of asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The developed real time TaqMan assay was rapid and easily performed and could be the best alternative for the diagnosis of CMV infection and monitoring of liver and kidney transplant patients.     

Relationship of cytomegalovirus load assessed by real-time PCR to pp65 antigenemia in organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised patients can lead to viremia associated with morbidity and mortality. Monitoring of viral loads in blood is critical for initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. OBJECTIVES: Validate quantitative real-time PCR assay targeting the US17 and UL54 regions of the CMV genome for automated DNA and extraction and amplification. STUDY DESIGN: 3422 blood specimens from organ transplant recipients, including longitudinal specimens from 12 organ transplant recipients, were tested by CMV PCR and pp65 antigenemia. RESULTS: CMV PCR for both US17 and UL54, was more sensitive and detected CMV DNA earlier and for longer than the CMV pp65 antigenemia test. Using antigenemia results as a reference standard, an optimal cutoff of 500 normalized copies was calculated for both US17 and UL54 PCR targets based on high sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. CMV DNA levels tracked well with clinical symptoms, response to treatment, and antigenemia. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of persistent increases in CMV DNA levels above 500 normalized copies by this real-time PCR assay is indicative of symptomatic CMV disease in organ transplant recipients. Quantitative real-time PCR for CMV DNA can be used in lieu of antigenemia for monitoring CMV infection and determining when to initiate preemptive treatment.     

Quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia using the pp65 antigenemia assay and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR PCR test after blood and marrow allogeneic transplantation

The performance of a commercially available qualitative PCR test for plasma (AMPLICOR CMV Test; Roche Diagnostics) and a quantitative PCR test for plasma and leukocytes (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test; Roche Diagnostics) was evaluated with samples from 50 blood or marrow allogeneic transplant recipients who received short courses of sequential ganciclovir therapy (2 weeks intravenously followed by 2 weeks orally) based on a positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia (AG) assay. The number of persons with a positive CMV test was significantly higher for leukocyte-based assays (AG, 67.5%; PCR, 62.5%) compared to both quantitative and qualitative PCR tests of plasma (42.5 and 35%, respectively). One person developed CMV disease during the study despite a negative AG assay; in this particular case, all PCR assays were found to be positive 10 days before his death. There was a trend for earlier positivity after transplantation and more rapid negativity after initiation of ganciclovir for the tests performed on leukocytes. The mean number of CMV copies as assessed by PCR was significantly higher in leukocytes than in plasma (P = 0.02). Overall, excellent agreement (kappa coefficient, >0.75) was found only between the two PCR assays (qualitative and quantitative) based on plasma. These results suggest that either the pp65 AG assay or the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test using leukocytes could be used to safely monitor CMV viremia in related allogeneic blood or marrow transplant recipients. Such a strategy will result in preemptive treatment for about two-thirds of the persons with a relatively low rate (<33%) of secondary viremic episodes following short courses of ganciclovir therapy.     

Optimization of quantitative detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma by real-time PCR

Previous studies have shown that detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in plasma is less sensitive than the antigenemia assay for CMV surveillance in blood. In 1,983 blood samples, plasma PCR assays with three different primer sets (UL125 alone, UL126 alone, and UL55/UL123-exon 4) were compared to the pp65 antigenemia assay and blood cultures. Plasma PCR detected CMV more frequently in blood specimens than either the antigenemia assay or cultures, but of the three PCR assays, the double-primer assay (UL55/UL123-exon 4) performed best with regard to sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values compared to antigenemia: 122 of 151 antigenemia-positive samples were detected (sensitivity, 80.1%), and there were 122 samples that were PCR positive-antigenemia negative (specificity, 93%). Samples with discrepant results had a low viral load (median, 0.5 cells per slide; 1,150 copies per ml) and were often obtained from patients receiving antiviral therapy. CMV could be detected by other methods in 15 of 29 antigenemia positive-PCR negative samples compared to 121 of 122 PCR positive-antigenemia negative samples (P < 0.001). On a per-subject basis, 21 of 25 patients (antigenemia positive-PCR negative) and all 57 (PCR positive-antigenemia negative) could be confirmed at different time points during follow-up. The higher sensitivity of the double-primer assay resulted in earlier detection compared to antigenemia in a time-to-event analysis of 42 CMV-seropositive stem cell transplant recipients, and two of three patients with CMV disease who were antigenemia negative were detected by plasma PCR prior to the onset of disease. Interassay variability was low, and the dynamic range was >5 log(10). Automated DNA extraction resulted in high reproducibility, accurate CMV quantitation (R = 0.87, P < 0.001), improved sensitivity, and increased speed of sample processing. Thus, primer optimization and improved DNA extraction techniques resulted in a plasma-based PCR assay that is significantly more sensitive than pp65 antigenemia and blood cultures for detection of CMV in blood specimens.     

Quantitative PCR in the diagnosis of CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during the antiviral treatment in renal transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant problem in transplantation. In this study, a quantitative PCR test was compared with the CMVpp65 antigenemia assay not only in the diagnosis CMV infections but especially in the monitoring of viral loads during ganciclovir treatment of CMV disease in individual renal transplant patients. Altogether 342 blood specimens were obtained from 116 patients. Blood specimens were used for Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and for the pp65 assay. Also shell vial culture was performed. The patients with a positive pp65 finding were monitored for CMV weekly during ganciclovir treatment and/or until the antigenemia subsided. CMV was detected in 31/116 (27%) patients, of whom 14 (12%) developed CMV disease and were treated with ganciclovir. CMV was found by shell vial culture in 13/14 cases, but by PCR and pp65 test in all 14 patients. CMV was detected in 156 (45%) samples; by PCR in 121/156 (range 344-103,000 copies/ml) and by pp65 test in 138/156 (range 1-1,000 positive cells/50,000 leukocytes) and by culture in 59/156 (38%) only. The peak viral loads were significantly (P<0.0001) higher in CMV disease than in untreated infections (19,650 vs. 379 copies/ml, and 100 vs. 5pp65 positive cells). In the monitoring of individual patients, the time-related CMV-DNAemia and pp65 antigenemia correlated well during the treatment of CMV disease. In conclusion, Cobas Amplicor Monitor plasma PCR and CMVpp65 antigen assays can be equally used in the diagnosis CMV infection and in the monitoring of viral load during antiviral treatment.     

Comparison of PCR and pp65 antigenemia assay with quantitative shell vial culture for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood leukocytes from solid-organ transplant recipients.

This study compared PCR and an assay for cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia (CMV-vue; INCSTAR Corp.) with a quantitative shell vial culture (QSVC) technique for the detection of CMV in serial blood specimens from 46 solid-organ transplant recipients. In a comparison based on 535 specimens tested by PCR and QSVC, CMV was detected by PCR in 41 and by QSVC in 37 of 43 recipients at risk of CMV infection. The mean number of days after transplantation of initial detection of CMV was 29.9 for PCR and 34.0 for QSVC (P = 0.01). The antigenemia assay was performed on 395 specimens, including 304 of those also tested by PCR. In these specimens, CMV was detected by the antigenemia assay, QSVC, and PCR in 30, 32, and 35 (respectively) of 38 patients at risk, with no statistically significant difference in the time to detection. Each of the assays detected CMV in similar proportions of patients with and without clinically significant CMV infection. PCR stayed positive longer after transplantation than the other assays but frequently returned to negative when more than 6 months had elapsed after transplantation. The antigenemia assay and PCR stayed positive longer after institution of antiviral therapy than QSVC. PCR can provide highly sensitive detection of CMV viremia, but a PCR assay for CMV is not yet available in kit form. The pp65 antigenemia assay and shell vial culture are quantifiable and comparable in sensitivity. Either is recommended for rapid detection of CMV in blood specimens from solid-organ transplant recipients.     

Comparison of PCR, antigenemia assay, and rapid blood culture for detection and prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after lung transplantation

The goal of this study was to evaluate serial cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood culture, antigenemia testing, and qualitative and quantitative plasma CMV PCR for their ability to predict CMV disease and thus to direct preemptive therapy after lung transplantation. Forty-one patients provided 414 samples for blood culture, 290 samples for antigenemia testing, and 432 samples for PCR. Seven patients developed 11 episodes of CMV disease. CMV PCR had sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values of 79, 99, 84, and 99%, respectively, compared with 48, 99, 85, and 98%, respectively, for antigenemia testing, and 8, 100, 100, and 97%, respectively, for culture. Only quantitative CMV PCR correlated with disease stage: asymptomatic patients had a mean of 1,500 CMV DNA copies/ml, whereas patients who developed CMV disease had 5,087 copies/ml 12 to 4 weeks before symptoms and 32,000 copies/ml at diagnosis. Furthermore, CMV PCR-measured DNA increased 5- to 10-fold immediately preceding symptoms. PCR and antigenemia test values decreased with anti-CMV therapy. CMV DNA (as detected by PCR), but not antigenemia, persisted in patients who later developed recurrent CMV disease. The data indicate that lung transplant recipients will benefit from monitoring of CMV disease by plasma CMV PCR.     

Validation of clinical application of cytomegalovirus plasma DNA load measurement and definition of treatment criteria by analysis of correlation to antigen detection

Successful preemptive cytomegalovirus (CMV) therapy in transplant patients depends on the availability of sensitive, specific, and timely diagnostic tests for CMV infections. The pp65 antigenemia assay has been used for this purpose with considerable success. Quantification of CMV DNA is currently regarded to be an alternative diagnostic approach. The precise relationship between these two methods has still to be defined, but is essential to compare diagnostic results. This study compared the results of both assays with a large series of transplant recipients in different categories. An internally controlled quantitative real-time CMV DNA PCR was used to test 409 plasma samples from solid organ transplant (SOT) and stem cell transplant (SCT) patients. Levels of CMV DNA in plasma correlated well with classified outcomes of the pp65 antigenemia test. Despite this correlation, the quantitative CMV PCR values in a class of antigen test results were within a wide range, and the definition of an optimal cutoff value for initiating treatment required further analysis by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. This is essential for reactivating infections in particular. For the SCT patients the optimal cutoff value of CMV DNA load defining relevant viral reactivation (in this assay, 10,000 copies/ml) was slightly higher than that for the SOT patients (6,300 copies/ml). Based on a comparison with the established pp65 antigenemia assay, quantification of CMV DNA in plasma appeared to be capable of guiding the clinical management of transplant recipients. This approach may have important advantages, which include a superior reproducibility and sensitivity, allowing the inclusion of kinetic criteria in clinical guidelines.     

Differences between the quantitative antigenemia assay and the cobas amplicor monitor quantitative PCR assay for detecting CMV viraemia in bone marrow and solid organ transplant patients.

The relationship between quantitative PCR (COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor, Roche Diagnostics) and quantitative antigenemia (Monofluor pp65, Sanofi Diagnostics) was examined for monitoring CMV viraemia. A total of 469 specimens from immunocompromised haematology and solid organ transplant patients were tested by quantitative antigenemia and qualitative PCR. Quantitative PCR (QPCR) was performed on the 245 specimens in which CMV DNA was detected by qualitative PCR. To exclude any effect due to specific anti-CMV treatment, analysis of antigenemia and QPCR results was only performed on the 164 of 245 specimens collected from patients not on ganciclovir or foscarnet treatment. Forty seven specimens had <400 CMV copies/mL and a negative antigen result, four specimens were antigen positive (all between 1 to 10 positive CMV cells/2 x 10(5) leucocytes) and had <400 CMV copies/mL. Fifty-one specimens had a CMV viral load > or = 400 copies/mL and a negative antigen result and 62 specimens had a CMV viral load > or = 400 copies/mL and a positive antigen. The viral load was shown to be as high as 43,000 copies/mL in some patients with a negative antigen and occurred in non-neutropenic patients. The correlation coefficient for antigen and QPCR results for specimens from bone marrow transplant patients, was 0.69 with an average CMV viral load of 3,200 copies/mL (SEM = 800) and an average antigen of nine positive CMV cells/2 x 10(5) leucocytes (SEM = 3). In the corresponding solid organ transplant group, the correlation coefficient for antigen and QPCR results was 0.71 with an average CMV viral load of 9,900 copies/mL (SEM = 2,100) and an average antigen of 26 positive CMV cells/2 x 10(5) leucocytes (SEM = 6). Both the average viral load and the average antigen result in specimens from solid organ transplant patients, were significantly higher than the average viral load and antigen result in the corresponding group of bone marrow transplant patients (Two-Sample-for-Means z-Test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). The differences in the kinetics of the two assays in monitoring CMV and their ability to predict CMV disease was also assessed in a sub-group of patients. In conclusion, the two assays used in this study do not always show parallel changes in CMV viral load, but may be complementary for the diagnosis and management of CMV disease. The observation that non-neutropenic patients can have a high viral load in plasma and a negative antigenemia has implications for laboratories using antigenemia alone to monitor patients for CMV disease.     

Comparison of the CMV brite turbo assay and the digene hybrid capture CMV DNA (Version 2.0) assay for quantitation of cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients

We compared the CMV Brite Turbo Kit (BT) and the Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA (version 2.0) assay (HC2) in the quantitation of pp65 antigenemia and cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA levels in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. Of 123 blood specimens collected from 24 renal transplant recipients, BT and HC2 assays detected 35 and 39 positive samples, respectively. The overall concordance rate between the two assays was 90%. Discordant results were observed at low levels of viremia, so that 8 samples were HC2 positive but BT negative and another 4 were BT positive but HC2 negative. There was good correlation (R(2) = 0.766; P<0.01) between the levels of CMV DNA and pp65 antigenemia in the 31 concordant positive samples. Correlation between results obtained with the two assays was confirmed by longitudinal studies for a patient who developed clinical CMV disease. HC2 may be more sensitive at low viremia levels and allow earlier detection of impending CMV disease. The BT assay offered the advantage of a rapid (2-h) turnaround time. We conclude that BT and HC2 assays have similar sensitivity and efficacy in the diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infection and disease in renal transplant recipients. While the HC2 assay would be appropriate for centers that handle a large number of samples, the BT test may be more suitable for small sample numbers or when results are needed urgently.     

Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

The performance of a plasma real-time PCR (cytomegalovirus [CMV] PCR kit; Abbott Diagnostics) was compared with that of the antigenemia assay for the surveillance of active CMV infection in 42 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) recipients. A total of 1,156 samples were analyzed by the two assays. Concordance between the two assays was 82.2%. Plasma DNA levels correlated with the number of pp65-positive cells, particularly prior to the initiation of preemptive therapy. Fifty-seven episodes of active CMV infection were detected in 37 patients: 18 were defined solely by the PCR assay and four were defined on the basis of the antigenemia assay. Either a cutoff of 288 CMV DNA copies/ml or a 2.42-log₁₀ increase of DNAemia levels between two consecutive PCR positive samples was an optimal value to discriminate between patients requiring preemptive therapy and those not requiring therapy on the basis of the antigenemia results. The real-time PCR assay allowed an earlier diagnosis of active CMV infection and was a more reliable marker of successful clearance of CMV from the blood. Analysis of the kinetics of DNAemia levels at a median of 7 days posttreatment allowed the prediction of the response to CMV therapy. Two patients developed CMV colitis. The PCR assay tested positive both before the onset of symptoms and during the disease period. The plasma real-time PCR from Abbott is more suitable than the antigenemia assay for monitoring active CMV infection in Allo-SCT recipients and may be used for guiding preemptive therapy in this clinical setting.     

Assessment of CMV load in solid organ transplant recipients by pp65 antigenemia and real-time quantitative DNA PCR assay: correlation with pp67 RNA detection

After bone marrow (BM) or solid-organ (SO) transplantation viremic Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is observed frequently. Quantitative assay of CMV in blood helps the management of this clinical condition. In the present report, 83 samples from 39 solid organ recipients, three CMV assays were compared simultaneously for the first time: the Nuclisens CMV pp67 assay (nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, NASBA), an "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assay (TaqMan) for CMV DNA, and pp65 antigenemia. The relation between CMV DNA and pp65 antigenemia, the quantitative assays, was evaluated on a larger group including 251 blood samples from 118 solid organ recipients. Real-time PCR provided the best results; > or =130 CMV DNA copies/2 x 10(5) peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) predicted > or =1 pp65 antigen positive (Ag+) cell/2 x 10(5) PBLs. By taking pp65 antigenemia as the "gold standard," the sensitivity of CMV DNA quantitation and of the pp67 RNA assay were 0.95 and 0.20, respectively, while the corresponding specificity values were 0.50 and 0.93. When real-time PCR was considered as the "gold standard," the sensitivity and specificity of the pp65 antigenemia were 0.65 and 0.91, respectively. Among the three tests examined, the sensitivity of the pp67 RNA assay was the lowest. On the other hand, the pp67 RNA assay was highly specific and effective in pinpointing high viremia patients. The present report, by providing predictive values for all three diagnostic profiles, DNA load, antigenemia, and pp67RNA, is a contribution for validation of real-time PCR as a new standard for quantitative assessment of CMV viremia in clinical settings.     

Evaluation of the AmpliSensor PCR and the SHARP signal detection system for the early prediction of symptomatic CMV infection in solid transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with high morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. Specific antiviral treatment at an early stage of CMV infection may effectively ameliorate, but not eliminate CMV disease in these patients. Presently, the pp65 antigenemia test on peripheral leukocytes is the method most widely used for predicting and monitoring transplant patients for active CMV infection. Nucleic acid amplification methods are less well defined since they lack standardisation. OBJECTIVE: A seminested fluorometric PCR assay (AmpliSensor-CMV, BAG, Germany) and a one-step PCR with a signal-amplification step (SHARP, Abbott, Germany) specific for the fragments of the CMV UL 122 and UL 123 genes, respectively, were evaluated for the early diagnosis of CMV infection. DESIGN: A total of 26 recipients of heterogeneous solid organs were monitored prospectively for a median of 99 days after transplantation. By testing 371 clinical samples parallel with the pp65-antigen assay and IgM and IgG EIA assays the sensitivity, specificity, correlation and quantitation potential of both PCRs was evaluated. RESULTS: Eight out of 26 patients developed active CMV infection. A total of 48 samples of these patients exceeded a CMV-DNA load threshold of 15 genome equivalents/10(5) leukocytes (AmpliSensor-CMV) and 41 samples exceeded the critical cut-off for the SHARP system. The AmpliSensor PCR exceeded its threshold consistently before the clinical onset of CMV disease (median 8 days). There was very good agreement between symptomatic CMV infection in patients and AmpliSensor-PCR, SHARP PCR, and pp65-antigen results (kappa-coefficient > 0.900). IgM and IgG EIA showed moderate agreement (kappa-coefficient = 0.591 and 0.552, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both PCRs and pp65 antigen assay correlated significantly better with CMV disease than serodiagnosis. The AmpliSensor PCR allowed more precisely than the SHARP system a quantitative determination of viral load and an early and reliable prediction of active CMV infection. The use of AmpliSensor PCR may improve the diagnosis and management of active CMV infection in organ transplant recipients.     

Analytic validation of a quantitative real-time PCR assay to measure CMV viral load in whole blood.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. We compared the CMV pp65 antigenemia test with a less labor intensive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in 109 whole blood samples predominantly from transplant patients and patients with AIDS. DNA was amplified on an Applied Biosystems 7900 instrument using a TaqMan probe targeting the CMV polymerase gene and the APOB human control gene. The DNA assay was linear over a 6-log range from 8 to 800,000 CMV genomes per reaction; coefficient of variation was 20%. CMV DNA was undetectable in 20 blood samples from healthy donors whereas it was detected in 55 of 109 patient samples. Results were concordant in a nonlinear fashion with those of the antigenemia test in 90/109 (83%). Evaluation of the discrepancies suggested that either PCR or antigenemia assays could be falsely negative when virus levels were quite low. A point mutation interfered with probe binding in 1 sample. A second real-time PCR targeting the immediate early gene was even more likely to be false negative. In summary, CMV viral load measurement targeting the polymerase gene is nearly equivalent to the antigenemia assay for detecting and monitoring active CMV infection in whole blood samples.     

Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

BACKGROUND: Although several diagnostic methods are available for the surveillance of patients at risk of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease, little data is available on their comparative performances in the diagnostic setting. OBJECTIVES: To compare different assays for CMV detection, especially assays based on (quantitative) DNA and mRNA detection. STUDY DESIGN: Eight allogeneic bone marrow and stem cell transplant recipients at high risk for developing CMV disease (donor CMV-negative, recipient positive) were regularly tested for 7-20 weeks post-transplant by spin-amplification rapid culture from urine (viruria), antigenemia (pp65 assay), pp67 mRNA in whole blood (NASBA), and CMV DNA both qualitatively (in-house PCR, whole blood) and quantitatively (in-house PCR, plasma; Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, plasma and whole blood; Hybrid Capture, whole blood). RESULTS: Four patients (50%) suffered CMV reactivation during follow-up. Out of 104 sample dates, 41 (39.4%) yielded a positive CMV result in at least one assay. Out of the 28 samples tested by all assays, the highest percentage of positive results was obtained with the in-house quantitative PCR (60.7%), followed by the Hybrid Capture system (39.3%), the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, plasma version (35.7%), the Cobas Amplicor CMV Monitor Test, whole blood version (32.1%), in-house qualitative PCR (28.6%), and the mRNA assay (21.4%). Viruria was positive in one sample and pp65 antigenemia was found in two samples. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a considerable incidence of CMV reactivations, pre-emptive anti-CMV chemotherapy prevented the development of CMV disease with the exception of one case. The molecular assays had superior sensitivity to conventional ones. The antigenemia assay proved unsuitable for the surveillance of hematological transplant patients. However, none of the tests recognized all timepoints with CMV reactivation. Further comparative studies are needed to determine their respective diagnostic values.     

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay is more sensitive than shell vial cultures for rapid detection of CMV in polymorphonuclear blood leukocytes.

We compared the cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay with shell vial cultures of polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL)-enriched blood fractions for rapid diagnosis of CMV viremia. PMNL fractions of 280 blood specimens from 171 patients (170 solid-organ transplant recipients and 1 patient undergoing pretransplant evaluation) were inoculated in shell vial and conventional CMV cultures. A commercially available kit (CMV-vue kit; INCSTAR Corp.) was used for the CMV antigenemia assay, in which PMNL preparations were stained with monoclonal antibodies directed against the CMV protein pp65. Mixed-leukocyte blood fractions from the same blood specimens were inoculated in parallel shell vial and conventional cultures. CMV viremia (defined by the isolation of CMV in conventional cultures) was detected in 32 (13%) of 245 PMNL fractions included in the final analysis. Twenty-eight (87.5%) were also positive in the CMV antigenemia assay, whereas 22 (69%) were positive in shell vial cultures. Ten (4%) additional PMNL fractions positive only in the CMV antigenemia assay were from eight patients with active CMV infections (six patients), who had previous or subsequent episodes of CMV viremia (seven patients), or in whom CMV was isolated in cultures of simultaneously obtained mixed-leukocyte fractions (three patients). Overall, the CMV antigenemia assay was significantly more sensitive than shell vial cultures for detection of CMV in the PMNL fraction of blood leukocytes (P < 0.01, McNemar's test), and we recommend it as the method of choice for rapid diagnosis of CMV viremia.     

Qualitative Plasma PCR Assay (AMPLICOR CMV Test) versus pp65 Antigenemia Assay for Monitoring Cytomegalovirus Viremia and Guiding Preemptive Ganciclovir Therapy in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

The performances of a commercially available qualitative plasma PCR assay (AMPLICOR CMV test; Roche Diagnostics) and the pp65 antigenemia assay (AG) were evaluated for the monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in 43 allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. In addition, the suitabilities of both assays for triggering the initiation of preemptive ganciclovir therapy were assessed. A total of 37 CMV viremic episodes were detected in 28 patients. Positivity of plasma PCR testing in one or more consecutive specimens was the only marker of CMV viremia in 18 of the 37 episodes (PCR positive and AG negative, n = 50 specimens). Five episodes were diagnosed on the basis of a single positive AG result (AG positive and PCR negative, n = 5 specimens); both assays were eventually positive (PCR positive and AG positive, n = 27 specimens) for 14 viremic episodes; for these episodes, conversion of the PCR assay result to a positive result occurred an average of 1 week before conversion of the AG result. Overall, the concordance between the two methods was 90%, and the sensitivities of the plasma PCR assay and AG for the detection of CMV viremic episodes were 86.5 and 51.3%, respectively. Two patients who tested positive by both assays simultaneously progressed to CMV end-stage organ disease, despite the initiation of preemptive ganciclovir therapy. Conversion of the AG result to a negative result upon administration of preemptive ganciclovir therapy occurred a median of 7.5 days earlier than conversion of the plasma PCR assay result. Nineteen of the 28 patients with CMV viremia received AG-guided preemptive ganciclovir therapy; had the positivity of the plasma PCR assay triggered the initiation of preemptive therapy, 9 additional patients would have been unnecessarily treated since none of them developed CMV end-stage organ disease. Although the AMPLICOR CMV assay is more sensitive than AG, the latter appears to be more suitable both for guiding the initiation of preemptive therapy and for monitoring a patient's response to antiviral therapy.     

Analysis of a quantitative PCR assay for CMV infection in liver transplant recipients: an intent to find the optimal cut-off value.

BACKGROUND: Preemptive therapy required highly predictive tests for CMV disease. CMV antigenemia assay (pp65 Ag) has been commonly used for rapid diagnosis of CMV infection. Amplification methods for early detection of CMV DNA are under analysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare two diagnostic methods for CMV infection and disease in this population: quantitative PCR (qPCR) performed in two different samples, plasma and leukocytes (PMNs) and using a commercial diagnostic test (COBAS Amplicor Monitor Test) versus pp65 Ag. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study conducted in liver transplant recipients from February 2000 to February 2001. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 164 samples collected weekly during early post-transplant period from 33 patients. Agreements higher than 78% were observed between the three assays. Optimal qPCR cut-off values were calculated using ROC curves for two specific antigenemia values. For antigenemia >or=10 positive cells, the optimal cut-off value for qPCR in plasma was 1330 copies/ml, with a sensitivity (S) of 58% and a specificity (E) of 98% and the optimal cut-off value for qPCR-cells was 713 copies/5x10(6) cells (S:91.7% and E:86%). Using a threshold of antigenemia >or=20 positive cells, the optimal cut-off values were 1330 copies/ml for qPCR-plasma (S 87%; E 98%) and 4755 copies/5x10(6) cells for qPCR-cells (S 87.5%; E 98%). Prediction values for the three assays were calculated in patients with CMV disease (9 pts; 27%). Considering the assays in a qualitative way, the most sensitive was CMV PCR in cells (S: 100%, E: 54%, PPV: 40%; NPV: 100%). Using specific cut-off values for disease detection the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for antigenemia >or=10 positive cells were: 89%; 83%; 67%; 95%, respectively. For qPCR-cells >or=713 copies/5x10(6) cells: 100%; 54%; 33% and 100% and for plasma-qPCR>or=1330 copies/ml: 78%, 77%, 47%, 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal cut-off for viral load performed in plasma and cells can be obtained for the breakpoint antigenemia value recommended for initiating preemptive therapy with high specificities and sensitivities. Diagnostic assays like CMV pp65 Ag and quantitative PCR for CMV have similar efficiency and could be recommended as methods of choice for diagnosis and monitoring of active CMV infection after transplantation.     

Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in granulocytes by polymerase chain reaction compared with the CMV antigen test.

To compare the sensitivity and suitability of detection of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection by using monoclonal antibodies against CMV antigen (antigen test to detect antigenemia) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR; to detect viral DNA) in granulocytes, 19 heart and 2 lung transplant recipients were closely monitored by these tests for at least 3 months after transplantation. All patients were CMV seropositive or had a seropositive donor. In total, 201 samples were tested; 46 were positive by both tests, 9 samples showed only antigenemia, 54 samples were positive by PCR only, and 102 samples were negative by both tests. PCR was positive earlier after transplantation in eight patients, whereas antigenemia was positive earlier after transplantation in one patient. In another four patients, both tests were positive at the same time. PCR was, on average, positive for a longer period of time. Discordant results showing a positive antigen test and a negative PCR were partly due to sampling error; some were positive by PCR on retesting. Samples which were negative by the antigen test and positive by PCR were taken at the beginning or at the end of an active CMV infection. In two patients, no active CMV infection was detected by the antigen test, cultures of urine and saliva, or serology, although PCR was positive for a long period of time in the two patients.