Genetic basis and pathophysiological implications of high plasma Lp(a) levels.

Lipoprotein(a) or Lp(a) is a genetic variant of plasma low density lipoproteins (LDL) containing apoB100 covalently linked to apolipoprotein(a) or apo(a), the specific marker of Lp(a). Lp(a) is heterogeneous in size and density, accounting in part for the marked size polymorphism of apo(a), 300 to 800 kDa. The apo(a) size polymorphism is related to the different number of kringle repeats which are structurally similar although not identical to the kringle 4 of plasminogen. Recent studies on a genomic level have indicated that the apo(a) gene contains at least 19 different alleles varying in length between 48 and 190 kb, partially impacting on the plasma levels of Lp(a). High plasma levels of Lp(a) have been found to be associated with an increased prevalence of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by mechanism(s) yet to be established. Both atherogenic and thrombogenic potentials have been postulated and have been related to the LDL-like and plasminogen-like properties of Lp(a), respectively.     

Lipoprotein(a): genotype-phenotype relationship and impact on atherogenic risk

In 2010, more than 45 years after the initial discovery of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] by Kare Berg, an European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel recommended screening for elevated Lp(a) in people at moderate to high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). This recommendation was based on extensive epidemiological findings demonstrating a significant association between elevated plasma Lp(a) levels and coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. In addition to those patients considered to be at moderate to high risk of heart disease, statin-treated patients with recurrent heart disease were also identified as targeted for screening of elevated Lp(a) levels. Taken together, recent findings have significantly strengthened the notion of Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for CVD. It is well established that Lp(a) levels are largely determined by the size of the apolipoprotein a [apo(a)] gene; however, recent studies have identified several other LPA gene polymorphisms that have significant associations with an elevated Lp(a) level and a reduced copy number of K4 repeats. In addition, the contribution of other genes in regulating Lp(a) levels has been described. Besides the strong genetic regulation, new evidence has emerged regarding the impact of inflammation as a modulator of Lp(a) risk factor properties. Thus, oxidized phospholipids that possess a strong proinflammatory potential are preferentially carried on Lp(a) particles. Collectively, these findings point to the importance of both phenotypic and genotypic factors in influencing apo(a) proatherogenic properties. Therefore, studies taking both of these factors into account determining the amount of Lp(a) associated with each individual apo(a) size allele are valuable tools when assessing a risk factor role of Lp(a).     

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a lipoprotein variant, was relegated for almost 25 years to the study of a few specialists. During the past 3 to 4 years, however, there has been a tremendous upsurge of interest in Lp(a), primarily because of multidisciplinary efforts in structural and molecular biology. Findings emerging from these efforts include the following: Lp(a) represents a cholesteryl-ester, low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle with apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 linked to apo(a); apo(a) is a glycoprotein coded by a single gene locus on the long arm of chromosome 6, which has several alleles, accounting for its remarkable size polymorphism (300 to 800 kD); apo(a) size polymorphism relates to plasma levels and density distribution of Lp(a); apo(a) is strikingly similar to plasminogen; and in vitro, Lp(a), in appropriate levels, competes for some physiologic functions of plasminogen in the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascade and may thus be thrombogenic. The LDL-like properties of Lp(a) may also confer atherogenic potential, but the mechanisms underlying this atherogenicity remain to be defined. In epidemiologic studies, high plasma Lp(a) levels have been associated with an increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, especially in patients less than 60 years of age. Moreover, Lp(a) has been found as an intact particle in the arterial intima, particularly in association with atherosclerotic plaque. This finding suggests that Lp(a) can transverse the endothelium, possibly by a non-receptor-mediated process, and, at the intimal level, acquire thrombogenic and atherogenic potentials. Current information justifies the need to determine plasma Lp(a) levels in patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the available techniques need to be standardized. Apolipoprotein(a) exists in isoforms of different sizes, and the importance of determining apo(a) phenotypes in clinical practice remains to be established.     

LPA gene: interaction between the apolipoprotein(a) size ('kringle IV' repeat) polymorphism and a pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism influences Lp(a) lipoprotein level

OBJECTIVES: In order to search for factors influencing the Lp(a) lipoprotein level, we have examined the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) size polymorphism as well as a pentanucleotide (TTTTA) repeat polymorphism in the 5' control region of the LPA gene. DESIGN: Lp(a) lipoprotein levels were compared between individuals with different genotypes as defined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of DNA plugs, and PCR of DNA samples followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. DNA plugs and DNA were prepared from blood samples collected from blood donors. RESULTS: Twenty-seven different K IV repeat alleles were observed in the 71 women and 92 men from which apo(a) size polymorphism results were obtained. Alleles encoding 26-32 Kringle IV repeats were the most frequent. Alleles encoding seven to 11 TTTTA repeats were detected in the 84 women and 122 men included in the pentanucleotide polymorphism study, and homozygosity for eight TTTTA repeats was the most common genotype. The eight TTTTA repeat allele occurred with almost any apo(a) allele. An inverse relationship between number of K IV repeats and Lp(a) concentration was confirmed. The contributions of the apo(a) size polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism to the interindividual variance of Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations were 9.7 and 3.5%, respectively (type IV sum of squares). Nineteen per cent of the variance in Lp(a) lipoprotein level appeared to be the result of the multiplication product (interaction) between the apo(a) size polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of the apo(a) size polymorphism alone to the variation in Lp(a) lipoprotein level was lower than previously reported. However, the multiplicative interaction effect between the K IV repeat polymorphism and the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism may be an important factor explaining the variation in Lp(a) lipoprotein levels among the populations.     

Lipoprotein(a): a genetically determined lipoprotein containing a glycoprotein of the plasminogen family

Lp(a) represents a genetically transmitted class of plasma LDL having apo B-100 linked by a disulfide bridge to a glycoprotein, apo(a). Lp(a) is heterogeneous in size and density. Apo(a) is also heterogeneous in size (molecular weight between approximately 300,000 and 700,000) due probably to the polymorphism of both polypeptide and carbohydrate chains. Recent studies have shown that apo(a) has a striking amino acid sequence homology with plasminogen, a serine protease zymogen that following activation to plasmin enters the fibrinolytic system. Apo(a) is severalfold larger than plasminogen (molecular weight approximately 90,000) and also differs from it because it fails to be activated to plasmin. This is due to the fact that arginine is replaced by serine at the site of cleavage by streptokinase, urokinase, or tissue plasminogen activator. A single gene locus appears to control the Lp(a) polymorphism as well as the concentration of the Lp(a) phenotypes in the plasma. Patients with high plasma levels of Lp(a) have been shown to have an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease but a causal relationship has not been firmly established. The information that is being rapidly acquired on the structure of Lp(a) should facilitate the understanding of the molecular basis of the polymorphism of this genetic variant and of the role that the various Lp(a) phenotypes play in atherosclerosis and thrombosis. The potential physiologic role of Lp(a) remains open to inquiry.     

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a class of lipoprotein particles having the lipid composition of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but with a distinct protein moiety comprised of two proteins linked together by a disulfide bridge. The two proteins are apoB100, the protein moiety of LDL, and apo(a), a heavily glycosylated protein that is specific for Lp(a). Apo(a) has a strong structural similarity to plasminogen and has a wide-size polymorphism that has a genetic origin and is partially responsible for the size and density heterogeneity of Lp(a). High plasma levels of Lp(a) are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease that is related to the atherogenic and thrombogenic potentials of this lipoprotein enhanced by the presence of other risk factors, among which are high plasma levels of LDL or low levels of high-density lipoprotein. The factors determining the plasma levels of Lp(a) have not been clearly identified except for an association with different alleles of the apo(a) gene, which is located in the long arm of chromosome 6. Currently there are no generally accepted ways to normalize the plasma levels of Lp(a) by either dietary and/or pharmacologic means. Until further progress in this area is made, patients with high plasma levels of Lp(a) should be advised to correct modifiable risk factors in order to decrease the cardiovascular pathogenicity of this lipoprotein class.     

Association of lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with coronary artery disease in Type 2 diabetic patients and in non-diabetic subjects.

AIMS: We investigated whether in Type 2 diabetic patients lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) polymorphism are associated with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD). We also examined whether there are differences in the distributions of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes between CAD patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: A hundred and seven diabetic patients with CAD, 274 diabetic patients without CAD, 201 non-diabetic patients with CAD, and 358 controls were enrolled. RESULTS: Diabetic patients with CAD showed Lp(a) levels (21.2 +/- 17.7 vs. 15.1 +/- 17.8 mg/dl; P = 0.0018) and a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) (67.2% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.0000) significantly greater than diabetic patients without CAD. Multivariate analysis showed that in diabetic patients Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes were significantly associated with CAD; odds ratios (ORs) of high Lp(a) levels for CAD were 2.17 (1.28-3.66), while ORs of the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW were 5.35 (3.30-8.60). Lp(a) levels (30.2 +/- 23.7 vs. 21.2 +/- 17.7 mg/dl; P = 0.0005) and the percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low MW (87.0% vs. 67.2%; P = 0.0001) were significantly higher in CAD patients without than in those with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes are independently associated with CAD in Type 2 diabetic patients; thus both these parameters may be helpful in selecting diabetic subjects at high genetic cardiovascular risk. However, Lp(a) levels and apo(a) polymorphism seem to be cardiovascular risk factors less important in diabetic than in non-diabetic subjects. Diabet. Med. 18, 589-594 (2001)     

Sequence polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein(a) gene and their association with lipoprotein(a) levels and myocardial infarction. The ECTIM Study.

Lp(a) concentrations are largely determined by apo(a) isoform size, but several studies have shown that apo(a) isoforms could not entirely explain the increase of Lp(a) levels observed in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Since up to 90% of the variance in Lp(a) levels has been suggested to be attributable to the apo(a) locus, the hypothesis that polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene other than size could contribute to the increase of Lp(a) levels in CHD patients must be considered. This hypothesis was tested in the ECTIM Study comparing 594 patients with myocardial infarction and 682 control subjects in Northern Ireland and France. In addition to apo(a) phenotyping, five previously described polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene were genotyped: a (TTTTA)n repeat at position -1400 from the ATG, a G/A at -914, a C/T at -49, a G/A at -21 and a Met/Thr affecting amino acid 4168. As reported earlier [Parra HJ, Evans AE, Cambou JP, Amouyel P, Bingham A, McMaster D, Schaffer P, Douste-Blazy P, Luc G, Richard JL, Ducimetiere P, Fruchart JC, Cambien F. A case-control study of lipoprotein particles in two populations at contrasting risk for coronary heart disease. The ECTIM study. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12:701-707], mean Lp(a) levels were higher in cases than in controls (20.7 vs 14.6 mg/dl in Belfast, 17.2 vs 8.9 mg/dl in France, P < 0.001 for case-control and population differences). In the present study, mean apo(a) isoform size differed significantly between cases and controls (25.7 vs 26.6 kr in Belfast, 25.9 vs 27.4 kr in France, P < 0.001 for case-control and P = 0.13 for population difference). After adjustment for apo(a) isoforms, Lp(a) levels remained significantly higher in cases than in controls (difference, 4.6 mg/dl; P < 0.001). Genotype and allele frequencies did not differ significantly between cases and controls for any of the five polymorphisms studied. The five polymorphisms were in strong linkage disequilibrium and had a combined heterozygosity of 0.83. In multivariate regression analysis adjusted for apo(a) isoforms, only the (TTTTA)n polymorphism was significantly associated with Lp(a) levels; it explained 4.5% of Lp(a) variability in cases and 3.1% in controls. The Lp(a) case/control difference was not reduced after taking into account the (TTTTA)n effect. We conclude that the increase of Lp(a) levels observed in MI cases, and which was not directly attributable to apo(a) size variation, was not related to the five polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene considered.     

Contribution of apolipoprotein(a) size, pentanucleotide TTTTA repeat and C/T(+93) polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene to regulation of lipoprotein(a) plasma levels in a population of young European Caucasians.

Several studies indicate that the inter-individual variation in plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is mainly under genetic control. To define the effect of three DNA polymorphisms on apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) expression, we have determined plasma Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoform size, KpnI allele size, the TTTTA pentanucleotide repeat number in the 5' control region of the apo(a) gene and the +93 C/T polymorphism in a European Caucasian population. The simultaneous determination of the kringle 4 (K4) number by genotyping and by phenotyping revealed that the size distribution of non-expressed apo(a) alleles was markedly skewed towards alleles with greater than 25 K4 repeats. This is consistent with the inverse relationship frequently described between the kringle 4 number and the plasma Lp(a) level. Apportioning the Lp(a) concentration from the surface of the peaks on apo(a) phenotyping blots, we have observed that the Lp(a) plasma concentration associated with alleles having more than 25 K4 units does not exceed 400 mg/l, whereas the range of Lp(a) concentrations associated with smaller alleles was broad, from 0 to more than 1000 mg/l. It can thus be concluded that the number of K4 repeats is the main determinant of Lp(a) concentration when this number is more than 25, whereas other polymorphisms may be involved in the alleles with fewer than 26 K4. Analyses of the TTTTA repeat number and of the +93 C/T polymorphism were performed in subjects with KpnI alleles of the same length: low Lp(a) concentrations were shown to be preferentially associated with the presence of apo(a) alleles with more than eight pentanucleotide repeats while no association was revealed between Lp(a) plasma levels and the C/T polymorphism. These results demonstrate that the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism affects the Lp(a) expression independently of apo(a) size polymorphism.     

Lipoprotein(a): An independent,genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a circulating lipoprotein, and its level is largely determined by variation in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) locus encoding apo(a). Genetic variation in the LPA gene that increases Lp(a) level also increases coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, suggesting that Lp(a) is a causal factor for CAD risk. Lp(a) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), a proatherogenic and proinflammatory biomarker. Lp(a) adversely affects endothelial function, inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrinolysis, and plaque stability, leading to accelerated atherothrombosis and premature CAD. The INTER-HEART Study has established the usefulness of Lp(a) in assessing the risk of acute myocardial infarction in ethnically diverse populations with South Asians having the highest risk and population attributable risk. The 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guideline have recognized elevated Lp(a) as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk enhancer for initiating or intensifying statin therapy.     

Apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In addition to high serum cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular risk factors may be involved in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in hypercholesterolemic subjects. As the levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor, are high in polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH), we investigated plasma Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in relation to occurrence of CHD events in PH patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoforms were determined in 191 PH patients, 83 normocholesterolemic subjects with CHD, and 94 normocholesterolemic controls without CHD. Lp(a) levels were similar in the hypercholesterolemic subjects with (n=100) or without CHD (n=91): 21.4 (range 6.6-59.23) vs 18.5 (range 5.25-57.25) mg/dL (p=NS). Low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (55%) in the PH patients with CHD, whereas high molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (62.6%) in those without CHD: this difference was significant (p<0.05). A stepwise multiple-discriminant analysis made in order to determine the independence of common cardiovascular risk factors, Lp(a) levels and low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms in predicting CHD among hypercholesterolemic subjects showed that the presence of a positive family history of CHD, smoking, age, and the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight were independently associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high Lp(a) levels, our findings do not support the hypothesis that Lp(a) plays an independent role in determining clinical CHD in PH subjects. However, the presence of at least one low molecular weight apo(a) isoform is an independent genetic predictor of CHD in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Together with other cardiovascular risk factors, apo(a) phenotypes should be assessed to evaluate the overall CHD risk status of all subjects with high serum cholesterol levels.     

Predictors of plasma lipoprotein(a) concentration in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study cohort

An elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Plasma Lp(a) levels are believed to be predominantly controlled by the APO(a) gene, which encodes the apo(a) glycoprotein moiety of the Lp(a) particle. However, other parameters in the lipoprotein profile as well as co-existing disease states or personal traits have been proposed as co-varieties. In order to examine these potential controlling factors in greater detail than previously possible, 1760 unrelated Caucasian subjects were studied, from which were identified 907 with a single expressing APO(a) allele. This strategy was followed to obviate the difficulty in dealing with the co-expression of different apo(a) isoforms and the resulting compound plasma Lp(a) level. After cube-root transformation of the plasma Lp(a) levels to normalise their distribution, a series of correlates were computed. There was no good correlation between Lp(a) concentration and any other measured lipid or lipoprotein in the lipid profile or with any other variable examined, with the important exception of the length of the expressed apo(a) isoform (r = -0.491, P = 0.0001). We conclude that in this population the plasma Lp(a) concentration is not predicted by the plasma lipid profile, alcohol intake, or smoking status but is predicted, albeit incompletely, by the length polymorphism of the APO(a) gene.     

The apolipoprotein(a) gene: linkage disequilibria at three loci differs in African Americans and Caucasians

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent, genetically regulated cardiovascular risk factor. Lp(a) plasma levels are largely determined by the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) component, and differ across ethnicity. Although a number of polymorphisms in the apo(a) gene have been identified, apo(a) genetic regulation is not fully understood. To study the relation between apo(a) gene variants, we constructed haplotypes and assessed linkage equilibrium in African Americans and Caucasians for three widely studied apo(a) gene polymorphisms (apo(a) size, +93 C/T and pentanucleotide repeat region (PNR)). Apo(a) size allele frequency distributions were different across ethnicity (p<0.01). For African Americans, PNR frequencies were similar across apo(a) sizes, suggesting linkage equilibrium. For Caucasians, the PNR and the PNR-C/T haplotype frequencies differed for large and small apo(a), with the T and PNR 9 alleles associated with large apo(a) size (p<0.0002); also, the PNR 9 allele was more common on a T allele, while PNR 8 was more common on a C allele. On a C allele background, small PNR alleles were more common and the PNR 10 allele less common among African Americans than Caucasians (p<0.001). The ethnic difference in apo(a) size distribution remained controlling for C/T and PNR alleles (p=0.023). In conclusion, allele and haplotype frequencies and the nature of the linkage disequilibrium differed between African Americans and Caucasians at three apo(a) gene polymorphisms.     

The role of lipoprotein(a) in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its utility as predictor of coronary heart disease events

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is a highly heterogeneous lipoprotein, due to variations in the size of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], and the density of the apoB100-containing particles to which apo(a) is linked. Although high plasma levels of Lp(a) have been associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the mechanism underlying this association is still largely undetermined, as is the potential role played by the particle’s heterogeneity. Lp(a) pathogenicity may also be influenced by the action of environmental factors and post-translational events relating to oxidative processes, and the action of lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes. Complicating the study of Lp(a) are the competing methods for its quantification due to its complex structure, and the lack of standardized methodologies. The recognition that Lp(a) particles may not all be alike in atherogenic potential should encourage studies to identify genetic and nongenetic factors underlying its heterogeneity, in order to reach a better understanding of its actual impact on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.     

High levels of inflammatory biomarkers are associated with increased allele-specific apolipoprotein(a) levels in African-Americans

BACKGROUND: A role of inflammation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is established. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent CVD risk factor where plasma levels are determined by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene, which contains inflammatory response elements. DESIGN: We investigated the effect of inflammation on allele-specific apo(a) levels in African-Americans and Caucasians. We determined Lp(a) levels, apo(a) sizes, allele-specific apo(a) levels, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in 167 African-Americans and 259 Caucasians. RESULTS: Lp(a) levels were increased among African-Americans with higher vs. lower levels of CRP [<3 vs. > or =3 mg/liter (143 vs. 108 nmol/liter), P = 0.009] or fibrinogen (<340 vs. > or =340 mg/liter, P = 0.002). We next analyzed allele-specific apo(a) levels for different apo(a) sizes. No differences in allele-specific apo(a) levels across CRP or fibrinogen groups were seen among African-Americans or Caucasians for small apo(a) sizes (<22 kringle 4 repeats). Allele-specific apo(a) levels for medium apo(a) sizes (22-30 kringle 4 repeats) were significantly higher among African-Americans, with high levels of CRP or fibrinogen compared with those with low levels (88 vs. 67 nmol/liter, P = 0.014, and 91 vs. 59 nmol/liter, P < 0.0001, respectively). No difference was found for Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of CRP or fibrinogen are associated with higher allele-specific medium-sized apo(a) levels in African-Americans but not in Caucasians. These findings indicate that proinflammatory conditions result in a selective increase in medium-sized apo(a) levels in African-Americans and suggest that inflammation-associated events may contribute to the interethnic difference in Lp(a) levels between African-Americans and Caucasians.     

Fish intake, independent of apo(a) size, accounts for lower plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in Bantu fishermen of Tanzania: The Lugalawa Study.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are largely genetically determined by sequences linked to the gene encoding apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], the distinct protein component of Lp(a). Apo(a) is highly polymorphic in length due to variation in the numbers of a sequence encoding the apo(a) kringle 4 domain, and plasma levels of Lp(a) are inversely correlated with apo(a) size. In 2 racially homogeneous Bantu populations from Tanzania differing in their dietary habits, we found that median plasma levels of Lp(a) were 48% lower in those living on a fish diet than in those living on a vegetarian diet. Considering the relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) plasma concentration, we have extensively evaluated apo(a) isoform distribution in the 2 populations to determine the impact of apo(a) size in the determination of Lp(a) values. The majority of individuals (82% of the fishermen and 80% of the vegetarians) had 2 expressed apo(a) alleles. Additionally, the fishermen had a high frequency of large apo(a) isoforms, whereas a higher frequency of small isoforms was found in the vegetarians. When subjects from the 2 groups were matched for apo(a) phenotype, the median Lp(a) value was 40% lower in Bantus on the fish diet than in those on the vegetarian diet. A significant inverse relationship was also found between plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and Lp(a) levels (r=-0.24, P=0.01). The results of this study are consistent with the concept that a diet rich in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and not genetic differences, is responsible for the lower plasma levels of Lp(a) in the fish-eating Bantus and strongly suggest that a sustained fish-based diet is able to lower plasma levels of Lp(a).     

Experimental Animal Models Evaluating the Causal Role of Lipoprotein(a) in Atherosclerosis and Aortic Stenosis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], comprised of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and a low-density lipoprotein-like particle, is a genetically determined, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) is the major plasma lipoprotein carrier of oxidized phospholipids, is pro-inflammatory, inhibits plasminogen activation, and promotes smooth muscle cell proliferation, as defined mostly through in vitro studies. Although Lp(a) is not expressed in commonly studied laboratory animals, mouse and rabbit models transgenic for Lp(a) and apo(a) have been developed to address their pathogenicity in vivo. These models have provided significant insights into the pathophysiology of Lp(a), particularly in understanding the mechanisms of Lp(a) in mediating atherosclerosis. Studies in Lp(a)-transgenic mouse models have demonstrated that apo(a) is retained in atheromas and suggest that it promotes fatty streak formation. Furthermore, rabbit models have shown that Lp(a) promotes atherosclerosis and vascular calcification. However, many of these models have limitations. Mouse models need to be transgenic for both apo(a) and human apolipoprotein B-100 since apo(a) does not covalently associated with mouse apoB to form Lp(a). In established mouse and rabbit models of atherosclerosis, Lp(a) levels are low, generally <20 mg/dL, which is considered to be within the normal range in humans. Furthermore, only one apo(a) isoform can be expressed in a given model whereas over 40 isoforms exist in humans. Mouse models should also ideally be studied in an LDL receptor negative background for atherosclerosis studies, as mice don’t develop sufficiently elevated plasma cholesterol to study atherosclerosis in detail. With recent data that cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis is causally mediated by the LPA gene, development of optimized Lp(a)-transgenic animal models will provide an opportunity to further understand the mechanistic role of Lp(a) in atherosclerosis and aortic stenosis and provide a platform to test novel therapies for cardiovascular disease.     

Does apolipoprotein(a) heterogeneity influence lipoprotein(a) effects on fibrinolysis?

High plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are considered to be an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease and are inversely associated with apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform sizes. The contribution of apo(a) polymorphism to the inhibition of fibrinolysis, a mechanism that may favor thrombus development, was therefore evaluated by measuring the ability of Lp(a) particles of distinct apo(a) isoform content to compete with plasminogen for fibrin binding during plasminogen activation by fibrin-bound tissue-type plasminogen activator. The rate of plasmin generation was most efficiently inhibited by an isoform with a molecular weight (M(r)) of approximately 540 Kd. An isoform with M(r) approximately 590 Kd produced a less pronounced effect, whereas the isoform with M(r) approximately 610 Kd failed to inhibit plasminogen activation. These effects were directly proportional to the amount of Lp(a) bound to the carboxy-terminal lysine residues of degraded fibrin. The relative affinity of the binding (kd range, 16 to 180 nmol/L) reflected the ability of individual Lp(a) isoforms to inhibit the binding of plasminogen (kd, 600 nmol/L). The question of the influence of kringle sequence variability on the binding to fibrin was not addressed by the present work. These data suggest that apo(a) isoform types with high affinity for fibrin may influence the ability of Lp(a) to interfere with fibrinolysis and contribute thereby to the association of elevated levels of Lp(a) with atherosclerotic and thrombotic risks.     

Associations among serum lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction in patients with extremely low and high levels of serum lipoprotein(a).

A high serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level, which is genetically determined by apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size polymorphism, is an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis. However, the associations among Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction (MI) have not been studied. Patients with MI (cases, n = 101, M/F: 86/15, age: 62+/-10y) and control subjects (n = 92, M/F: 53/39, age: 58+/-14y) were classified into quintile groups (Groups I to V) according to Lp(a) levels. Apo(a) isoform phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose/gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (3-6%), which identified 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type. Groups with higher Lp(a) levels (Groups II, III, and V) had higher percentages of MI patients than that with the lowest Lp(a) levels (Group I) (54%, 56%, or 75% vs. 32%, p<0.05). Groups with different Lp(a) levels had different frequency distributions of apo(a) isoprotein phenotypes: Groups II, III, IV, and V, which had increasing Lp(a) levels, had increasingly higher percentages of smaller isoforms (A1-A4, A5-A9) and decreasingly lower percentages of large isoforms (A10-A20, A21-A25) compared to Group I. An apparent inverse relationship existed between Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype. Subjects with the highest Lp(a) levels (Group V) had significantly (p<0.05) higher serum levels of total cholesterol, apo B, and Lp(a). Patients with MI and the controls had different distributions of apo(a) phenotypes: i.e., more small isoforms and more large size isoforms, respectively (A1-A4/A5-A9/A10-A20/A21-A25: 35.7%/27.7%/20.8%/15.8% and 22.8%/23.9%/29.4%/23.9%, respectively). Lp(a) (parameter estimate +/- standard error: 0.70+/-0.20, Wald chi2 = 12.4, p = 0.0004), apo(a) phenotype (-0.43+/-0.15, Wald chi2 = 8.17, p = 0.004), High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apo A-I, and apo B were significantly associated with MI after adjusting for age, gender, and conventional risk factors, as assessed by a univariate logistic regression analysis. The association between Lp(a) and MI was independent of the apo(a) phenotype, but the association between the apo(a) phenotype and MI was not independent of Lp(a), as assessed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. This association was not influenced by other MI- or Lp(a)-related lipid variables. These results suggest that apo(a) phenotype contributes to, but does not completely explain, the increased Lp(a) levels in MI. A stepwise logistic regression analysis with and without Lp(a) in the model identified Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype as significant predictors for MI, respectively.     

Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and coronary heart disease in NIDDM patients. Relationship with apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes

Summary Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a strong and independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. We assessed the potential relationship between plasma Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes and coronary heart disease in a population of NIDDM patients. Seventy-one patients with coronary heart disease, who previously have had transmural myocardial infarction, or significant stenosis on coronary angiography, or positive myocardial thallium scintigraphy, or in combination, were compared with 67 patients without coronary heart disease, who tested negatively upon either coronary angiography, myocardial thallium scintigraphy or a maximal exercise test. The prevalence of plasma Lp(a) levels elevated above the threshold for increased cardiovascular risk (>0.30 g/l) was significantly higher (p=0.005) in patients with coronary heart disease (33.8%) compared to the control group (13.4%). The relative risk (odds ratio) of coronary heart disease among patients with high Lp(a) concentrations was 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.31–7.34;p=0.01). The overall frequency distribution of apo(a) phenotypes differed significantly between the two groups (p=0.043). However, the frequency of apo(a) isoforms of low apparent molecular mass (700 kDa) was of borderline significance (p=0.067) between patients with or without coronary heart disease (29.6% and 16.4%, respectively). In this Caucasian population of NIDDM patients, elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with coronary heart disease, an association which was partially accounted for by the higher frequency of apo(a) isoforms of small size. In multivariate analyses, elevated levels of Lp(a) were independently associated with coronary heart disease (odds ratio 3.48, p=0.0233).Abbreviations NIDDM Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - IDDM insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - CHD coronary heart disease - Lp(a) lipoprotein(a) - apo(a) apolipoprotein(a) - apoB apolipoprotein B - HMGCoA reductase hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase