The effect of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability.

This study determined the effect of radial head fracture size and ligament injury on elbow kinematics. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were studied in an in vitro elbow simulator. Testing was performed with ligaments intact, with the medial collateral (MCL) or lateral collateral (LCL) ligament detached, and with both the MCL and LCL detached. Thirty degree wedges were sequentially removed from the anterolateral radial head up to 120 degrees . Valgus angulation and external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were determined for passive motion, active motion, and pivot shift testing with the arm in a vertical (dependent) orientation. Maximum varus-valgus laxity was calculated from measurements of varus and valgus angulation with the arm in horizontal gravity-loaded positions. No effect of increasing radial head fracture size was observed on valgus angulation during passive and active motion in the dependent position. In supination, external rotation increased with increasing fracture size during passive motion with LCL deficiency and both MCL and LCL deficiency. With intact ligaments, maximum varus-valgus laxity increased with increasing radial head fracture size. With ligament disruption, elbows were grossly unstable, and no effect of increasing radial head fracture size occurred. During pivot shift testing, performed with the ligaments intact, subtle instability was noted after resection of one-third of the radial head. In this in vitro biomechanical study, small subtle effects of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability were seen in both the ligament intact and ligament deficient elbows. These data suggest that fixation of displaced radial head fractures less than or equal to one-third of the articular diameter may have some biomechanical advantages; however, clinical correlation is required.     

Overhead arm positioning in the rehabilitation of elbow dislocations: An in vitro biomechanical study

Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical study.IntroductionElbow stiffness is a common complication following elbow dislocation. Overhead exercises have been proposed to initiate early motion to reduce stiffness through employing gravity to stabilize the elbow. The implications of this position with regard to elbow kinematics after dislocation have not been reported.Purpose of the StudyTo determine the influence of the overhead position on elbow stability following combined medial and lateral collateral ligament (MCL and LCL) injuries.MethodsPassive and simulated active extension were performed on 11 cadaveric elbows with the arm in the overhead, dependent, and horizontal positions and with the forearm in pronation, neutral, and supination. Internal-external rotation (IER) and varus-valgus angulation (VVA) of the ulnohumeral joint were assessed for the intact elbow and after simulated MCL-LCL injury. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to analyze the effects of elbow state, arm position, forearm rotation, and extension angle.ResultsDuring passive extension with the arm overhead, the pronated position resulted in more internal rotation than supination (-2.6 ± 0.7°, P = .03). There was no effect of forearm rotation on VVA. The overhead position increased internal rotation relative to the dependent position when the forearm was neutral (-8.5 ± 2.5°, P = .04) and relative to the horizontal position when the forearm was supinated (-12.7 ± 2.2°, P= .02). During active extension, pronation increased valgus angle compared to the neutral (+1.2 ± 0.3°, P= .04) and supinated (+1.5 ± 0.4°, P= .03) positions, but did not affect IER. There was no difference between active and passive motion with the arm overhead (P > .05).DiscussionMovement of the injured elbow in the overhead position most closely replicated kinematics of the intact elbow compared to the other arm positions.ConclusionsOverhead elbow extension results in similar kinematics between an intact elbow and an elbow with MCL and LCL tears. As such, therapists might consider early motion in this position to reduce the risk of elbow stiffness after dislocation.     

Surgical management of medial and lateral elbow instability secondary to acute atypical complex elbow dislocation: Case report and literature review

Introduction and importanceElbow dislocation is common in adults, and complex elbow dislocations are generally associated with bone fractures. Anteromedial coronoid fracture, in association with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) disruption, often results from varus posteromedial forces. “Terrible triad” injuries are more likely to result from valgus posterolateral forces. However, our case presentation has combined medial and lateral elbow instability in addition to “terrible triad” injury of the elbow with no radial head injury.Case presentationThe patient was a 38-year-old man with an atypical complex elbow dislocation. He was successfully treated by stabilizing the medial epicondyle and coronoid anterolateral facet fractures, in addition to LCL repair and medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction. A radial head fracture was unnoted. The procedure yielded satisfactory functional outcome, with a stable and painless full elbow range of motion.Clinical discussionMulti-ligament injuries with coronoid fractures result in highly unstable elbow joints, forming a variant of the “terrible triad” injury. Surgical options vary according to the surgeon’s experience and equipment availability. In this case, direct LCL repair and MCL reconstruction were performed and were well tolerated. Elbow stability improved and the patient experienced improved functionality with minimal pain. However, it may be premature to report a definite outcome in this case because of short follow-up time postoperatively.ConclusionThe injury described in this case has a unique presentation as a multi-ligamentous injury will make the elbow very unstable. Thus, careful clinical judgment, knowledge, and experience are needed to identify the underlying injury and for optimal management.     

Rehabilitation of the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow: an in vitro biomechanical study

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative contribution of muscle activity and the effect of forearm position on the stability of the medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient elbow. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm in both supination and pronation was performed using a custom elbow testing apparatus. Testing was first performed on intact specimens, then on MCL-deficient specimens. Elbow instability was quantified using an electromagnetic tracking device by measuring internal-external rotation and varus-valgus laxity of the ulna relative to the humerus. Compared with the intact elbow, transection of the MCL, with the arm in a vertical orientation, caused a significant increase in internal-external rotation during passive elbow flexion with the forearm in pronation, but forearm supination reduced this instability. Overall, following MCL transection the elbow was more stable with the forearm in supination than pronation during passive flexion. In the pronated forearm position simulated active flexion also reduced the instability detected during passive flexion, with the arm in a varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientation. The maximum varus-valgus laxity was significantly increased with MCL transection regardless of forearm position during passive flexion. We concluded that active mobilization of the elbow with the arm in vertical orientation during rehabilitation is safe in the setting of an MCL-deficient elbow with the forearm in a fully supinated and pronated position. Splinting and passive mobilization of the MCL-deficient elbow with the forearm in supination should minimize instability and valgus elbow stresses should be avoided throughout the rehabilitation period.     

The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability

PURPOSE: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is commonly performed for the management of acute or subacute instability after elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations. The effectiveness of transosseous repair of the MCL, as is typically performed clinically, in restoring the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow is of interest as is the effect of MCL tensioning on the initial stability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether suture repair of the MCL is able to restore the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow and to determine the optimal initial MCL repair tension. METHODS: Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an upper limb joint simulator. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion was generated while the kinematics were measured with the arm in the dependent and the valgus gravity-loaded orientations. After testing the intact elbow, the MCL was released at its humeral attachment and repaired using a transosseous suture technique at three different repair tensions: 20, 40, and 60 N. RESULTS: Medial collateral ligament repair using a transosseous suture technique restored the kinematics and stability of the MCL-deficient elbow. Motion pathways were affected by the magnitude of initial MCL tension. For all arm orientations and forearm positions, the 20-N and 40-N repairs were not statistically different from each other or from the intact MCL. The 60-N repairs, however, were often statistically different than the other groups, suggesting an overtightening that tended to pull the ulna into a varus position-especially in the midrange of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MCL repair using transosseous sutures provide adequate joint stability to permit early motion. There is a broad range of acceptable tensions for MCL repair, which is a favorable, clinically relevant finding. Clinical studies are needed to validate these in vitro results.     

The effect of suture fixation of type I coronoid fractures on the kinematics and stability of the elbow with and without medial collateral ligament repair

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of suture repair of type 1 coronoid fractures on elbow kinematics in ligamentously intact and medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient elbows. Cadaveric testing was performed in stable and MCL-deficient elbows with radial head arthroplasty and with the coronoid intact, with the coronoid fractured, and after suture repair. Ulna versus humerus angulation was measured during active motion. Varus and valgus motion pathways were measured during passive gravity-loaded flexion. With intact ligaments, there was a small increase in valgus angulation after a type 1 fracture that was not corrected with suture fixation. With MCL deficiency, there was no change in kinematics regardless of coronoid status. Type 1 coronoid fractures cause only small changes in elbow kinematics that are not corrected with suture repair. MCL repair, rather than type 1 coronoid fixation, should be considered if the elbow remains unstable after radial head repair or replacement and lateral ligament repair.     

Kinematics of the ligamentous unstable elbow joint after application of a hinged external fixation device: a cadaveric study

We studied the kinematics of 8 ligamentous unstable elbow joint preparations after application of the Orthofix elbow external fixation device. Valgus, varus, external rotatory, and internal rotatory load tests were performed in lateral collateral ligament (LCL)-deficient and LCL/medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient joints. After placement of the fixator, the mean extension decreased significantly to 19.5 degrees +/- 7.2 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint and to 19.1 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint compared with the mean extension of the intact joint, which was 10.5 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees. After application of the fixator, valgus displacement was significantly decreased by 4.0 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint and by 3.6 degrees +/- 3.3 degrees in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint compared with the intact joint. External rotatory displacement was significantly decreased in the LCL-deficient joint by 4.9 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees and in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint by 5.0 degrees +/- 4.7 degrees. Internal rotatory displacement was significantly decreased by 3.3 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint, but it was not significantly changed in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint. The Orthofix elbow external fixator guided elbow motion to a more varus position compared with the intact elbow and decreased the range of motion of the joint, constraining mainly extension. We conclude that the fixator stabilized the ligamentous unstable elbow joint efficiently but at the expense of changes in the normal motion pattern.     

Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints

The stabilizing structures of the elbow that resist valgus stress were studied with a tracking device in a model simulating active motion and muscle activity. By varying the order of serial release of the medial collateral ligament complex and removal of the radial head, each structure's contribution to valgus stability against the effect of gravity was determined. In the otherwise intact elbow, absence of the radial head does not significantly alter the three-dimensional characteristics of motion in the elbow joint. Isolated medial collateral release, on the other hand, causes increases in abduction rotation of about 6 degrees-8 degrees in magnitude. Releasing both structures results in gross abduction laxity and elbow subluxation. This study defines the medial collateral ligament (MCL) as the primary constraint of the elbow joint to valgus stress and the radial head as a secondary constraint. This definition facilitates the proper management of patients with radial head fractures and MCL disruption. The comminuted radial head fracture uncomplicated by MCL insufficiency should be treated by excision without the need for an implant and without concern of altering the normal kinematics of the elbow.     

Single-strand reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament restores varus and posterolateral rotatory stability of the elbow

Because of a lack of biomechanical studies of lateral elbow ligament reconstruction in the literature, the initial stability afforded by 3 different techniques of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction was evaluated in 8 cadaveric elbows. The arm was mounted in a testing apparatus, and passive flexion was performed with the arm in varus and valgus orientations. A pivot shift test was performed with the arm in the vertical orientation. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify motion pathways. After intact testing, each specimen underwent sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments from the lateral epicondyle. Reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament was performed in a randomized sequence, consisting of proximal single-strand, distal single-strand, and double-strand tendon grafts. Division of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments from the lateral epicondyle caused a significant decrease in rotational stability when the pivot shift test was being performed (P <.0001). Varus-valgus stability also decreased after transection of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments (P <.0001). Reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament restored elbow stability to that of the intact state. There was no significant difference in stability between the single- and double-strand repair techniques (P >.05). This study demonstrates that both single- and double-strand reconstructions restore varus and posterolateral elbow stability and may be considered appropriate reconstructive procedures in patients with symptomatic insufficiency of the lateral ligaments of the elbow.     

Posttraumatic incarceration of medial collateral ligament into knee joint with anterior cruciate ligament injury

Medial collateral ligament of the knee is an important coronal stabiliser and often injured in isolation or as combination of injuries. The article reports a case of incarcerated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in 20 year old male who presented to us 4 weeks after injury. Clinical examination and MRI was correlated to complete ACL tear with torn distal MCL and incarceration into the joint. Patient was taken up for ACL hamstring graft reconstruction with mini-arthrotomy and repair of the torn MCL. Patient was followed up with dedicated rehabilitation protocol with good functional results. At one year follow-up, patient exhibited full range of motion with negative Lachman, Pivot shift and valgus stress tests. This article highlights the rare pattern of MCL tear and also reviews the literature on this pattern of injury.     

Unstable Simple Elbow Dislocation Treated with the Repair of Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex

Background

Unstable simple elbow dislocation (USED) repair is challenged by the maintenance of joint reduction; hence, primary repair or reconstruction of disrupted ligaments is required to maintain the congruency and allow early motion of the elbow. We evaluated the effectiveness and the outcome of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex repair with additional medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair in cases of USED.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 21 cases of diagnosed USED without fractures around the elbow that were treated with primary ligament repair. In all cases, anatomical repair of LCL complex with or without common extensor origin was performed using suture anchor and the bone tunnel method. Next, the instability and congruency of elbow for a full range of motion were evaluated under the image intensifier. MCL was repaired only if unstable or incongruent elbow was observed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and radiographic outcomes on last follow-up images.

Results

All cases achieved a stable elbow on radiographic and clinical results. LCL complex repair alone was sufficient to obtain the stable elbow in 17 of 21 cases. Four cases required additional MCL repair after restoration of the LCL complex. The overall mean MEPS was 91 (range, 70 to 100): excellent in 12 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 2 cases. All 17 cases with LCL complex repair only and 2 of 4 cases with additional MCL repair had excellent or good results by MEPS.

Conclusions

USED requires surgical treatment to achieve a congruent and stable joint. If the repair of lateral stabilizer such as LCL complex acquires enough joint stability to maintain a full range of motion, it may not be necessary to repair the medial stabilizer in all cases of USED.     

The role of biceps loading and muscle activation on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: An in vitro biomechanical study

IntroductionLittle evidence-based information is available to direct the optimal rehabilitation of patients with anterior Monteggia injuries.Purpose of the StudyThe aims of this biomechanical investigation were to (1) quantify the effect of biceps loading and (2) to compare the effect of simulated active and passive elbow flexion on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries.Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical study.MethodsSix cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. The effect of biceps loading, simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions was examined with application of 0N, 20N, 40N, 60N, 80N, and 100N of load. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions were then performed with the forearm supinated. Radial head translation relative to the capitellum was measured using an optical tracking system. After testing the intact elbows, the proximal ulna was osteotomized and realigned using a custom jig to simulate an anatomical reduction. We then sequentially sectioned the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane to simulate soft tissue injuries commonly associated with anterior Monteggia fractures.ResultsGreater magnitudes of biceps loading significantly increased anterior radial head translation. However, there was no significant difference in radial head translation between simulated active and passive elbow flexion except in the final stage of soft tissue sectioning. There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with progressive injury states with both isometric biceps loading and simulated active and passive motion.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that anatomic reduction of the ulna may not be sufficient to restore radial head alignment in anterior Monteggia injuries with a greater magnitude of soft tissue injury. In cases with significant soft tissue injury, the elbow should be immobilized in a flexed and supinated position to allow relaxation of the biceps and avoid movement of the elbow in the early postoperative period.     

Fractures of the capitellum

Forty intact cadaver elbows were studied to determine the contribution of the capitellum to elbow stability. With the elbow at 10 degrees of flexion, valgus motion of the elbow after capitellum excision demonstrated a minimal increase. Although some increase in valgus motion did occur after capitellum excision and radial head resection it was not until the ulnar collateral ligament was released that a severe valgus deformity was produced. In addition, isolated capitellum excisions occurring with release of the medial collateral ligament produced severe valgus motion, demonstrating the importance of medial structures to elbow stability. The cadaver study suggests excision of the capitellum in the otherwise intact elbow has little effect on valgus motion. Over the past 15 years, 17 patients with fractures of the capitellum were treated. Followup at greater than 1 year utilizing various treatment modalities is reported. Although closed reduction gave the best result, acceptable results were also obtained by open reduction and internal fixation and excision. Our clinical findings corroborated the cadaver findings in that valgus instability of the elbow only occurred when fracture of the capitellum was associated with medial ligament injuries.     

Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow

The stabilizing influence of radial head arthroplasty was studied in eight medial collateral ligament deficient anatomic specimen elbows. An elbow testing apparatus, which used computer controlled pneumatic actuators to apply tendon loading, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. The motion pathways of the elbow were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device, with the forearm in supination and pronation. As a measure of stability, the maximum varus to valgus laxity over the range of elbow flexion was determined from the difference between varus and valgus gravity loaded motion pathways. After transection of the medial collateral ligament, the radial head was excised and replaced with either a silicone or one of three metallic radial head prostheses. Medial collateral ligament transection caused a significant increase in the maximum varus to valgus laxity to 18.0 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees. After radial head excision, this laxity increased to 35.6 degrees +/- 10.3 degrees. The silicone implant conferred no increase in elbow stability, with a maximum varus to valgus laxity of 32.5 degrees +/- 15.5 degrees. All three metallic implants improved the valgus stability of the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow, providing stability similar to the intact radial head. The use of silicone arthroplasty to replace the radial head in the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow must be questioned. Metallic radial head arthroplasty provides improved valgus stability, approaching that of an intact radial head.     

Complex instability of the anterior knee

Complex knee instability involves the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and one or more major stabilizers of the knee [medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)]. The medial side has a high healing potential and does not need operative treatment in most cases if ACL reconstruction is performed. Reconstruction of the medial ligament complex is indicated in gross instability of the medial meniscus fixation, dislocation of the MCL into the joint, and large dislocated bony avulsions. Injuries on the lateral side do not heal spontaneously and require acute operative treatment (first 2 weeks). Frank knee dislocations and gross multiligament injuries should be reduced acutely, and the integrity of the vascular structures must be examined closely. In a European multicenter study, operative treatment with reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments and functional rehabilitation gave better results than conservative treatment with immobilization of the joint.     

Ligamentous stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The lateral ulnar collateral ligament, the entire lateral collateral ligament complex, and the overlying extensor muscles have all been suggested as key stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether either an intact radial collateral ligament alone or an intact lateral ulnar collateral ligament alone is sufficient to prevent posterolateral rotatory instability when the annular ligament is intact. METHODS: Sequential sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments was performed in twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. At each stage of the sectioning protocol, a pivot shift test was performed with the arm in a vertical position. Passive elbow flexion was performed with the forearm maintained in either pronation or supination and the arm in the varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientations. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify the internal-external rotation and varus-valgus angulation of the ulna with respect to the humerus. RESULTS: Compared with the intact elbow, no differences in the magnitude of internal-external rotation or maximum varus-valgus laxity of the ulna were detected with only the radial collateral or lateral ulnar collateral ligament intact (p > 0.05). However, once the entire lateral collateral ligament was transected, significant increases in internal-external rotation (p = 0.0007) and maximum varus-valgus laxity (p < 0.0001) were measured. None of the pivot shift tests had a clinically positive result until the entire lateral collateral ligament was sectioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, when the annular ligament is intact, either the radial collateral ligament or the lateral ulnar collateral ligament can be transected without inducing posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.     

Capitellar fracture with bony avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament in a child: Case report

IntroductionIsolated capitellar fracture is a rare injury accounting for 1% of all elbow fractures Bryan and Morrey (1985) and Poynton et al. (1998). In children, a fall on an outstretched hand, before the fusion of the epiphysis, usually leads to lateral condyle physeal fractures. Very few cases of capitellar fractures in the paediatric population have been reported.Presentation of caseOur patient, a 9-year-old girl presented with a capitellar fracture and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) avulsion of her left elbow. A type IV capitellar fracture, indicated by the double arc sign on the radiogram, was confirmed with 3-dimensional computed tomography. The patient underwent open reduction through a lateral approach and fixation with 2 Herbert’s screws. The lateral collateral ligament (LCL) avulsion was repaired with 2 suture anchors. Early mobilization and rehabilitation were started soon after the surgery. Follow-up radiography showed union of the fracture with no signs of osteonecrosis.DiscussionCapitellum fracture in children is easily overlooked due to its rarity. And hereby, meticulous history, clinical examination and proper radiological views with high index of suspicion is crucial in order diagnose these injuries. Our patient had type IV capitellar fracture with lateral collateral ligament avulsion. Principles of management of these intra articular fractures include accurate reduction, stable fixation and early mobilization. We used an extensile lateral approach to expose, reduce and fix the fracture. LCL avulsion was fixed with 2 suture anchors.ConclusionCapitellum fractures are rare injuries in children. Careful evaluation and proper stable fixation are the cornerstones of good functional results.     

Stabilizers of capitellocondylar total elbow arthroplasty

The contribution of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL, LCL) and muscle forces to the kinematics and stability of the capitellocondylar total elbow arthroplasty was investigated in six fresh cadaveric elbows. The three-dimensional orientation of the ulna relative to the humerus was monitored with the use of an electromagnetic tracking device in neutral, valgus, and varus stress positions with (1) the ligaments intact, (2) LCL insufficiency obtained by osteotomizing the lateral epicondyle, (3) partial MCL insufficiency obtained by sectioning either the anterior or posterior bundle of the MCL, and (4) complete MCL insufficiency. Simulated muscle forces were applied as follows: (1) no load, (2) 1 kg each to the biceps and the brachialis and 2 kg to the triceps, and (3) 2 kg to the biceps and the brachialis and 4 kg to the triceps. The laxity was defined as the difference in valgus/varus orientation of the ulna in the valgus and varus stress positions. The laxity at 40°, 75°, and 110° elbow flexion was analyzed. The greatest laxity occurred with LCL insufficiency (40.7° ± 11.6°, average at three flexion angles) followed by that with MCL insufficiency (15.7° ± 9.9°), both of which were significantly larger than laxity with the intact ligaments (5.6° ± 2.5°). The laxity with the anterior bundle sectioned (12.0° ± 8.1°) was significantly greater than with the posterior bundle sectioned (3.3° ± 3.6°); thus the contribution of anterior bundle to stability was four times that of posterior bundle. Stabilizing effect of muscle loading was small in elbows with intact ligaments, whereas it was large with LCL or MCL insufficiency. Based on these data, we can see that the integrity of both the MCL and LCL is essential to maintain stability of this total elbow, the anterior bundle is a more important stabilizer than the posterior bundle, and the collateral ligaments seem to be the primary stabilizer and the musculature seems to be the secondary stabilizer. Careful implantation technique to preserve the collateral ligaments is required to obtain postoperative stability of this arthroplasty. Otherwise, routine exposure of the MCL and repair or reinforcement of the MCL, if deficient, may need to be considered during surgery.     

重建肘关节外翻稳定性的生物力学研究

目的　评价肘关节桡骨头 (radial head,RH)切除、尺侧副韧带 (medial collateral ligament,MCL )损伤以及 RH假体置换、MCL重建后的外翻稳定性。　方法　新鲜成人尸体上肢标本 12侧 ,制成肘关节“骨 -韧带”标本 ,在2 N· m的外翻力矩作用下 ,分别在肘关节 0°、30°、6 0°、90°和 12 0°伸屈时 ,测量肘关节外翻松弛度 :1完整肘关节(n=12 ) ;2 MCL切断 (n=6 ) ;3RH切除 (n=6 ) ;4 MCL切断 +RH切除 (n=12 ) ;5 RH假体置换 (n=6 ) ;6 MCL重建(n=6 ) ;7RH假体置换 +MCL重建 (n=12 )。用 SPSS 10 .0统计软件包作方差分析 ,比较各组的外翻稳定性。　结果　完整肘关节的平均外翻松弛度最小 ;RH切除后 ,外翻松弛度增大 ;单纯 MCL切断 ,外翻松弛度大于单纯 RH切除 (P<0 .0 1) ;MCL切断 +RH切除 ,外翻稳定性最差 ;行 RH假体置换 ,对稳定性有改善 ;MCL重建与完整 MCL差异无统计学意义 (P>0 .0 5 ) ;RH假体置换同时重建 MCL ,效果最好。　结论　 MCL是抵抗肘关节外翻应力最主要的因素 ,RH是次要因素。在重建肘关节的外翻稳定性方面 ,MCL的重建比 RH的假体置换更重要。在无条件行 RH假体置换时 ,修复MCL是较好的手术方式。     

Elbow subluxation and dislocation. A spectrum of instability.

After sequential releases of the ligaments and capsules of 13 fresh autopsy specimen elbows, external rotation and valgus moments with axial forces resulted in posterior dislocations in 12 of the 13 with the anterior medical collateral ligament (AMCL) intact. Kinematic displacements measured with a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device showed that dislocation involved posterolateral rotation of 34 degrees-50 degrees and 5 degrees-23 degrees valgus at about 80 degrees flexion. Dislocation is the final of three sequential stages of elbow instability resulting from posterolateral rotation, with soft-tissue disruption progressing from lateral to medial. In each stage, the pathoanatomy correlated with the pattern and degree of instability. Testing for valgus stability of the elbow during simulated active flexion revealed no significant increase (-0.3 degrees-2.4 degrees) in valgus laxity after reduction compared with the intact specimens (p greater than 0.05, beta = 0.1, delta = 2.5 degrees). In no case did the digitized AMCL origin-to-insertion distance increase beyond normal during the dislocation (p less than 0.01). The mechanism of dislocation during a fall on the outstretched hand would involve the body "rotating internally" on the elbow, which experiences an external rotation/valgus moment as it flexes. Posterior dislocations should therefore be reduced in supination. If valgus stability in pronation is demonstrated, the AMCL can be assumed to be intact, and rehabilitation in a hinged cast-brace with the elbow in full pronation can be commenced immediately.