共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
How to cite this article: Mehta C, Mehta Y. Noninvasive Respiratory Devices in COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(7):770–772. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sameer Jog Kapil Zirpe Subhal Dixit Purushotham Godavarthy Manasi Shahane Kayanoosh Kadapatti Jignesh Shah Kapil Borawake Zafer Khan Urvi Shukla Ashwini Jahagirdar Venkatesh Dhat Pradeep Dcosta Jayant Shelgaonkar Abhijit Deshmukh Khalid Khatib Shirish Prayag 《Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine》2022,26(7):791
13.
14.
Yuwen Luo Yan Luo Yun Li Luqian Zhou Zhe Zhu Yitai Chen Yuxia Huang Xin Chen 《Yonsei medical journal》2016,57(4):936-941
PurposeThe efficacy of helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to critically review studies that investigated the effect of helmet CPAP on gas exchange, mortality, and intubation rate in comparison with standard oxygen therapy.ResultsFour studies with 377 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Compared to the standard oxygen therapy, helmet CPAP significantly increased the PaO2/FiO2 [weighted mean difference (WMD)=73.40, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 43.92 to 102.87, p<0.00001], and decreased the arterial carbon dioxide levels (WMD=-1.92, 95% CI: -3.21 to -0.63, p=0.003), intubation rate [relative risk (RR)=0.21, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.40, p<0.00001], and in-hospital mortality rate (RR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.50, p=0.0004).ConclusionThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that helmet CPAP improves oxygenation and reduces mortality and intubation rates in hARF. However, the significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the literature implies that large RCTs are needed to determine the role of helmet CPAP in different hypoxemic ARF populations. 相似文献
15.
16.
Kapil G Zirpe Anand M Tiwari Sushma K Gurav Abhijit M Deshmukh Prasad B Suryawanshi Prajkta P Wankhede Upendrakumar S Kapse Abhaya P Bhoyar Afroz Z Khan Ria V Malhotra Pranoti H Kusalkar Kaustubh J Chavan Seema A Naik Rahul B Bhalke Ninad N Bhosale Sonika V Makhija Venkata N Kuchimanchi Amol S Jadhav Kedar R Deshmukh Gaurav S Kulkarni 《Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine》2021,25(5):493
17.
Si-Ho Kim Jin Yeong Hong Seongman Bae Hojin Lee Yu Mi Wi Jae-Hoon Ko Bomi Kim Eun-Jeong Joo Hyeri Seok Hye Jin Shi Jeong Rae Yoo Miri Hyun Hyun ah Kim Sukbin Jang Seok Jun Mun Jungok Kim Min-Chul Kim Dong-Sik Jung Sung-Han Kim Kyong Ran Peck 《Journal of Korean medical science》2022,37(18)
BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is often accompanied by secondary infections, such as invasive aspergillosis. In this study, risk factors for developing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) and their clinical outcomes were evaluated.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included critically ill COVID-19 patients from July 2020 through March 2021. Critically ill patients were defined as patients requiring high-flow respiratory support or mechanical ventilation. CAPA was defined based on the 2020 European Confederation of Medical Mycology and the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology consensus criteria. Factors associated with CAPA were analyzed, and their clinical outcomes were adjusted by a propensity score-matched model.ResultsAmong 187 eligible patients, 17 (9.1%) developed CAPA, which is equal to 33.10 per 10,000 patient-days. Sixteen patients received voriconazole-based antifungal treatment. In addition, 82.4% and 53.5% of patients with CAPA and without CAPA, respectively, received early high-dose corticosteroids (P = 0.022). In multivariable analysis, initial 10-day cumulative steroid dose > 60 mg of dexamethasone or dexamethasone equivalent dose) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–13.79) and chronic pulmonary disease (adjusted OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.26–14.02) were independently associated with CAPA. Tendencies of higher 90-day overall mortality (54.3% vs. 35.2%, P = 0.346) and lower respiratory support-free rate were observed in patients with CAPA (76.3% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.089).ConclusionOur study showed that the dose of corticosteroid use might be a risk factor for CAPA development and the possibility of CAPA contributing to adverse outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients. 相似文献
18.
19.
20.