Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESRecent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort.METHODSA total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis.RESULTSIn the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.83; P = 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87–1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.13; P = 0.91, respectively).CONCLUSIONSData do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.     

Impact of gender on 10-year outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESOur goal was to evaluate the impact of gender on the 10-year outcome of patients after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) included in the Italian nationwide PRedictIng long-term Outcomes afteR Isolated coronary arTery bypass surgery (PRIORITY) study.METHODSThe PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CABG and were included in 2 prospective multicentre cohort studies. The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Baseline differences between the study groups were balanced with propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment. Time to events was analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis.RESULTSThe study population comprised 10 989 patients who underwent isolated CABG (women 19.6%). Propensity score matching produced 1898 well-balanced pairs. The hazard of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event was higher in women compared to men [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.23; P = 0.009]. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event in women was significantly higher at 1 year (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.55; P < 0.001) and after 1 year (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00–1.24; P = 0.05). Mortality at 10 years in the matched groups was comparable (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93–1.16; P = 0.531). Women have significantly a higher 10-year risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17–1.68; P = 0.002) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.59; P = 0.003).CONCLUSIONSThe present study documented an excess of non-fatal cardiac events after CABG among women despite comparable 10-year survival with men. These findings suggest that studies investigating measures of tertiary prevention are needed to decrease the risk of adverse cardiovascular events among women.     

Sex differences in outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESPrevious reports have found females are a higher risk of morbidity and mortality following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here, we describe the differences in outcomes following isolated CABG between males and females.METHODSFollowing a systematic literature search, studies reporting sex-related outcomes following isolated CABG were pooled in a meta-analysis performed using the generic inverse variance method. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of stroke, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, and late mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies published before and after the year 2000 and for the type of risk adjustment.RESULTSEighty-four studies were included with a total of 903 346 patients. Females were at higher risk for operative mortality (odds ratio: 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64–1.92, P < 0.001). At subgroup analysis, there was no difference in operative or late mortality between studies published prior and after 2000 or between studies using risk adjustment. Females were at a higher risk of late mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.26, P < 0.001), major adverse cardiac events (IRR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.66, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (IRR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13–1.45, P < 0.001) and stroke (IRR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.51, P > 0.001) but not repeat revascularization (IRR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76–1.29, P = 0.95). The use of the off-pump technique or multiple arterial grafts was not associated with the primary outcome.CONCLUSIONSFemales undergoing CABG are at higher risk for operative and late mortality as well as postoperative events including major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction and stroke. PROSPERO registrationCRD42020187556     

Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThis study aims to systematically review published literature on male–female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD).METHODSA systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 January 1999 and 19 October 2020 investigating mortality and morbidity in adult patients diagnosed with AD. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences and a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed for early mortality. Overall survival and reoperation were visualized by pooled Kaplan–Meier curves.RESULTSNine studies investigating type A dissections (AD-A), 1 investigating type B dissections (AD-B) and 3 investigating both AD-A and AD-B were included encompassing 18 659 patients. Males were younger in both AD-A (P < 0.001) and AD-B (P < 0.001), and in AD-A patients males had more distally extended dissections [OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.70; P < 0.001]. Longer operation times were observed for males in AD-A (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.41; P < 0.001) while male patients were less often treated conservatively in AD-B (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58–0.72; P < 0.001). The pooled early mortality risk ratio for males versus females was 0.94 (95% CI 0.84–1.06, P = 0.308) in AD-A and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–1.03, P = 0.143) in AD-B. Pooled overall mortality in AD-A showed no male–female difference, whereas male patients had more reinterventions during follow-up.CONCLUSIONSThis systematic review shows male–female differences in AD patient and treatment characteristics, comparable early and overall mortality and inconsistent outcome reporting. As published literature is scarce and heterogeneous, large prospective studies with standardized reporting of male–female characteristics and outcomes are clearly warranted. Improved knowledge of male–female differences in AD will help shape optimal individualized care for both males and females.Clinical registration numberPROSPERO, ID number: CRD42020155926.     

Outcome of the frozen elephant trunk procedure as a redo operation

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe goal of this study was to determine the outcome of patients undergoing an elective frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure as a redo operation following previous cardiac surgery.METHODSOne hundred and eighteen consecutive patients underwent FET procedures between October 2010 and October 2019 at our centre. Patients were registered in a dedicated database and analysed retrospectively. Clinical and follow-up characteristics were compared between patients undergoing a FET operation as a primary (primary group) or a redo procedure (redo group) using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. Emergency procedures (n = 33) were excluded from the analysis.RESULTSA total of 36.5% (n = 31) of the FET procedures were redo operations (redo group) and 63.5% (n = 54) of the patients underwent primary surgery (primary group). There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality [primary group: 7.4%; redo group: 3.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.19–35.29); P = 0.63] and the 3-year mortality [primary group: 22.2%; redo group: 16.7%; 95% CI (0.23–3.23); P = 0.72] between redo and primary cases. Furthermore, the adjusted statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the groups in the occurrence of transient or permanent neurological deficit, paraplegia, acute renal failure and resternotomy. The redo group showed a higher rate of recurrent nerve palsy, which did not reach statistical significance [primary group: 3.7% (n = 2); redo group: 19.4% (n = 6); P = 0.091].CONCLUSIONSElective FET procedures as redo operations performed by a dedicated aortic team following previous cardiac surgery demonstrate an adequate safety profile.     

Risk factors for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease following lung cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) following lung cancer resection. METHODSWe performed a literature screening on the databases including PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE^® and the Web of Science for related studies published up to January 2021. Eligible studies were included and data on risk factors related to postoperative AE were extracted. All analyses were performed with random-effect model.RESULTSA total of 12 studies of 2655 lung cancer patients with ILD were included in this article. The meta-analysis indicated that male [odds ratios (ORs) = 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–3.11, P = 0.041], usually interstitial pneumonia pattern on CT (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06–2.17, P = 0.021), Krebs von den Lungen-6 [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.06–0.94, P = 0.027], white blood cell (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.12–0.93, P = 0.010), lactate dehydrogenase (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.04–0.90, P = 0.032), partial pressure of oxygen (weighted mean difference = −3.09, 95% CI: −5.99 to −0.19, P = 0.037), surgery procedure (OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.42–3.77, P < 0.001) and operation time (weighted mean difference = 28.26, 95% CI: 1.13–55.39, P = 0.041) were risk factors for AE of ILD following lung cancer resection.CONCLUSIONSWe found that males, usually interstitial pneumonia pattern on CT, higher levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6, lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cell, lower partial pressure of oxygen, greater scope of operation and longer operation time were risk factors for AE of ILD following lung cancer resection. Patients with these risk factors should be more prudently selected for surgical treatment and be monitored more carefully after surgery.     

Mid-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with mild left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is common and associated with adverse events in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the prognosis of mild LVSD has not been clearly described. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of patients with mild LVSD following CABG.METHODSThis multicentre cohort study using propensity score matching took place from December 2012 to October 2019 in Jiangsu Province, China, with a mean and maximum follow-up of 3.2 and 7.2 years, respectively. Patients were classified to normal left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥53%) and mild LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction >40%/<53%). The primary outcomes were death from all causes and death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary outcomes were heart failure, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and a composite of all mentioned outcomes, including death from all causes (major adverse events).RESULTSA total of 581 pairs were formed after matching. In-hospital death (1.5% vs 2.1%, P = 0.51) did not differ between 2 cohorts. Throughout 7 years, mild LVSD was associated with higher rates of death from all causes [hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.89; P = 0.012], death from cardiovascular causes (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36–0.90; P = 0.017), heart failure (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37–0.93; P = 0.023) and major adverse events (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.91; P = 0.009). There was no difference in the rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization.CONCLUSIONSMild LVSD was associated with a worse mid-term prognosis in patients following CABG.     

Factors influencing length of intensive care unit stay following a bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe goal of this study was to identify the risk factors for prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) after a bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) procedure and its impact on the number of deaths.METHODSIn total, 556 patients who underwent BCPS between January 1998 and December 2019 were included in the study.RESULTSEighteen patients died while in the ICU, and 35 died after discharge from the ICU. Reduced ventricular function was significantly associated with death during the ICU stay (P = 0.002). In patients who were discharged alive from the ICU, LOS in the ICU [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.06; P < 0.001] and a dominant right ventricle (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.03–6.63; P = 0.04) were independent risk factors for death. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a cut-off value for length of ICU stay of 19 days. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05; P = 0.04) was a significant risk factor for a prolonged ICU stay.CONCLUSIONSProlonged LOS in the ICU with a cut-off value of 19 days after BCPS was a significant risk factor for mortality. High pulmonary artery pressure at BCPS was a significant risk factor for a prolonged ICU stay.     

Tracheobronchial stents in patients with malignant airway disease: Finnish tertiary care experience

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESTracheobronchial stenting has an established role in the palliation of malignant central airway obstruction (CAO). The purpose of this study is to describe the experience with self-expanding metal airway stents in 2 tertiary referral centres, covering a third of the population of Finland.METHODSPatients referred to and treated with airway stenting for malignant CAO using self-expanding metal-stents were identified from electronic patient records, and data were collected using a structured Endoscopic Lower Airway Management instrument. Statistical analysis to reveal factors affecting patient benefit and survival was carried out.RESULTSA total of 101 patients (mean age 65.8) and 116 procedures were identified. Procedure-related mortality was rare (3/101 patients) and complications infrequent. The median survival was 2.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4–3.1). Stent benefit was not significantly affected by clinical characteristics. Survival was impacted by the use of adjunct procedures [hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, 95% CI: 0.23–0.58, P < 0.001), procedural urgency (HR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23–0.71, P = 0.002) and post-treatment chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15–0.56, P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe beneficial impact observed supports the further use of tracheobronchial stenting in malignant CAO. The use of self-expanding metal stents is encouraged.     

Incidence and management of the left ventricular outflow obstruction in patients with atrioventricular septal defects

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESLeft ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is a recognized complication after complete repair of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). This study reviewed the incidence and management of LVOTO following AVSD repair at a single institution.METHODSFrom 1975 to 2019, 24 patients (3.3%, 24/730) underwent reoperation due to LVOTO following partial AVSD (pAVSD) and complete AVSD (cAVSD) repair. The data were retrospectively reviewed.RESULTSThe incidence of LVOTO following pAVSD and cAVSD repair was 4.4% (12/275) and 2.6% (12/455). Freedom from LVOTO reoperation following pAVSD and cAVSD repair at 25 years was 94.3% [95% confidence interval (CI); 89.7–96.7] and 95% (95% CI; 91.1–97.3). The median time from complete repair of pAVSD and cAVSD to LVOTO reoperation was 4.4 years [interquartile range (IQR): 3.4–6.7] and 2.6 years (IQR: 2.2–4.7). Freedom from second LVOTO reoperation at 5, 10 and 15 years was 83.7% (95% CI; 57.2–98.2), 59.2% (95% CI; 28.7, 80.3) and 39.5% (95% CI; 13.2–65.3). The median time between the first and the second LVOTO reoperation in the groups of pAVSD and cAVSD was 6.1 years (IQR: 3.4–8.9) and 8.6 years (IQR: 5.7–9.8). There was no significant difference regarding the first (P = 0.7406) and subsequent LVOTO (P = 0.7153) following complete repair of pAVSD and cAVSD. Combined access to the left ventricular outflow tract was not protective regarding LVOTO reoccurrence. Survival for both groups after LVOTO reoperation at 15 years was 95.6% (95% CI 99.4–72.9).CONCLUSIONSIncidence of LVOTO after AVSD repair is low but the reoccurrence rate is high. Standard subaortic resection does not always provide definitive LVOTO relief. The survival after LVOTO reoperation is excellent.     

Mid-term clinical and haemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta bioprosthesis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and haemodynamic results after implantation of the Trifecta bioprosthesis.METHODSThis study is a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing Trifecta aortic valve replacement between 01 January 2012 and 31 December 2017 at the Ghent University Hospital. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of valve- and procedure-related complications and mortality. The haemodynamic performance was analysed by longitudinal Doppler echocardiography.RESULTSThe mean age of the 182 patients was 77 [standard deviation (SD): 5.5] years; 54.9% were women. The mean follow-up was 39.8 (SD: 24.3) months. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years was 86% (SD: 3%) and 68% (SD: 4%), respectively, and overall freedom from structural valve deterioration was 100% and 98% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. There was no valve thrombosis nor early endocarditis. Urgent surgery was the only risk factor for early mortality in the multivariable analysis [P = 0.009, odds ratio 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.5]. Preoperative atrial fibrillation was the most important predictor of late mortality (P = 0.001, hazard ratio 3.68, 95% CI 1.65–8.21). The average peak gradients were stable from discharge up to 1 and 5 years postoperatively [15 (SD: 6) and 17 (SD: 8) mmHg].CONCLUSIONSThese results confirm the excellent clinical performance of the Trifecta valve, particularly in an elderly age group. Through the 7-year follow-up period, low transvalvular gradients persisted, and only a few patients needed reoperation. Although structural valve degeneration occurred rarely, it was unrelated to valve size or age at implantation; therefore, further long-term follow-up remains mandatory.     

Fragmented QRS complex may predict long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESFragmented QRS (fQRS), related to myocardial fibrosis, is an important prognostic marker of cardiovascular events and mortality. Aortic stenosis (AS), the most frequent valvular heart disease in developed countries, causes myocardial fibrosis due to ventricular pressure overload. The current study aimed to investigate whether fQRS is associated with long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe AS.METHODSA total of 289 patients who underwent SAVR for severe AS between May 2009 and January 2020 with interpretable electrocardiogram were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of fQRS. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to detect cumulative survival rates. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the predictors of all-cause mortality.RESULTSfQRS occurred in 126 (43.5%) patients. A total of 59 (20.4%) patients died over a follow-up period of 54 ± 32 months. All-cause mortality was higher in the fQRS group (23 [14.1%] vs 36 [28.6], log-rank test P = 0.002) in the long term. The presence of fQRS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.802, confidence interval (CI): 1.035–3.135, P = 0.037], electrocardiographic left ventricular strain (HR: 1.836, CI: 1.036–3.254, P = 0.038) and history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (HR: 3.130, CI: 1.528–6.412, P = 0.002) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality in the multivariable Cox regression model.CONCLUSIONSfQRS is associated with a 1.8-fold increase in long-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated SAVR for severe AS. Detecting fQRS in electrocardiograms may provide prognostic information about the long-term outcomes.     

Myasthenia gravis affects overall survival in patients with thymoma: an analysis of multicentre database using propensity score matching

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESAbout one-third of patients with thymoma have myasthenia gravis (MG). It remains controversial whether MG affects the prognosis of patients with thymoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MG on the prognosis of patients with thymoma in a multicentre database.METHODSPatients with thymoma who underwent thymectomy were identified from 2 prospectively collected databases in 2 medical centres from 2010 to 2018. Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to assess overall survival and recurrence-free survival, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine significant contributors to survival. Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate selection bias.RESULTSA total of 514 patients with thymoma were included in this study, of whom 320 patients were MG-free and 194 had MG. Patients with MG were younger (median age 50 vs 54 years, P = 0.001) and had smaller tumours (4.4 ± 2.0 vs 4.9 ± 2.3 cm, P = 0.020). Pathological analysis showed that type B tumours especially B2−B3 (B2 + B3 + mix B tumours, 55.2%) are more common in patients with MG, while type AB (37.2%) was the most common in patients without MG. A larger proportion of Masaoka III–IV stage tumour (25.7% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) was seen in patients with thymoma and MG. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MG (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.729, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.398–9.947, P = 0.009), incomplete resection (HR = 5.441, 95% CI: 1.500–19.731, P = 0.010) and Masaoka stage III + IV (HR = 3.390, 95% CI: 1.196–9.612, P = 0.022) were negative prognostic factors of overall survival. Meanwhile, MG (HR =3.489, 95% CI: 1.403–8.680, P = 0.007) and Masaoka stage III + IV (HR = 6.582, 95% CI: 2.575–16.828, P < 0.001) were negative prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival. Propensity-matched analysis compared 148 patient pairs. K-M survival analysis demonstrated that MG was associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival in propensity score-matched patients (log-rank, P = 0.034 and 0.017, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThymoma patients with MG have smaller tumours and a higher percentage of late-stage tumours, which are mainly of WHO B types, especially B2−B3 types. In addition, MG is significantly associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival in thymoma.     

Real-time intraoperative co-registration of transesophageal echocardiography with fluoroscopy facilitates transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation in cases of invisible degenerated bioprosthetic valves

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESTranscatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) implantation is an alternative treatment to surgery for high-risk patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves. Some types of bioprostheses are fluoroscopically translucent, resulting in an ‘invisible’ target deployment area. In this study, we describe the feasibility and outcomes of this procedure using intraoperative fusion of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and live fluoroscopy to facilitate valve deployment in cases of invisible bioprosthetic valves. METHODSWe reviewed all TMViV implantations at our centre from July 2014 to July 2019. Patient, procedure and outcome details were compared between those with a visible bioprosthesis (N = 22) to those with an invisible one (N = 12). Intra-operative TEE and live Fluoroscopy co-registration were used for real-time guidance for all invisible targets.RESULTSAll valve implantations were completed successfully in both groups without cardiovascular injury, valve migration or left ventricular outflow-tract obstruction. Technical success was 100% in both groups. One-year survival was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70–96] for the entire cohort, with 79% (95% CI 63–100) survival for the visible group and 92% (95% CI 77–100) for the invisible group. Probability of 1-year survival free from mitral valve reintervention, significant valve dysfunction, stroke or myocardial infraction was 78% (95% CI 63–93) for all patients whereby the probability was 72% (95% CI 54–97) in the visible group and 80% (95% CI 59–100) for the invisible group.CONCLUSIONSThe use of intraoperative TEE and live fluoroscopy image fusion facilitates accurate TMViV among patients with a fluoroscopically invisible target-landing zone.     

Long-term outcomes after ascending aortic replacement and aortic root replacement for type A aortic dissection

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESWe investigated whether the selective use of supracoronary ascending aorta replacement achieves late outcomes comparable to those of aortic root replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).METHODSPatients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2005 to 2018 at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, were included in this analysis. Late mortality was evaluated with the Kaplan–Meier method and proximal aortic reoperation, i.e. operation on the aortic root or aortic valve, with the competing risk method.RESULTSOut of 309 patients, 216 underwent supracoronary ascending aortic replacement and 93 had aortic root replacement. At 10 years, mortality was 33.8% after aortic root replacement and 35.2% after ascending aortic replacement (P = 0.806, adjusted hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.77–2.02), and the cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 6.0% in the aortic root replacement group and 6.2% in the ascending aortic replacement group (P = 0.65; adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.15–1.89). Among 71 propensity score matched pairs, 10-year survival was 34.4% after aortic root replacement and 36.2% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.70). Cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 7.0% after aortic root replacement and 13.0% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.22). Among 102 patients with complete imaging data [mean follow-up, 4.7 (3.2) years], the estimated growth rate of the aortic root diameter was 0.22 mm/year, that of its area 7.19 mm²/year and that of its perimeter 0.43 mm/year.CONCLUSIONSWhen stringent selection criteria were used to determine the extent of proximal aortic reconstruction, aortic root replacement and ascending aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection achieved comparable clinical outcomes.     

A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESWe performed a literature meta-analysis to estimate the rate of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.METHODSPertinent articles were identified from the PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases. Eligible studies reported the de novo incidence of postoperative pacemaker implantation after Perceval valve surgery. Among 394 articles retrieved, 26 studies including 9492 patients met the inclusion criteria.RESULTSThe pooled event rate for postoperative pacemaker implantation was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6–9%]; however, significant heterogeneity was observed across studies. In a sub-analysis, there was no difference between the rates of pacemaker implantation calculated from multicentre and registry studies (8 studies, 6845 patients; 7%, 95% CI 5–10%) and single-centre studies (18 studies, 2647 patients; 7%, 95% CI 5–9%; P = 0.75). Implantation rates were similar in high-volume studies (16 studies, 9121 patients; 7%, 95% CI 5–8%) than in low-volume studies (10 studies, 371 patients; pooled rate: 7%, 95% CI 4–14%; P = 0.5). Postoperative pacemaker implantation rates tended to decrease over time.CONCLUSIONSWith a pooled event rate of 7%, postoperative pacemaker implantation remains an important limitation of Perceval sutureless valve surgery, although we observed a degree of variability across included studies. The resultant findings provide a useful estimate for physicians and patients and can serve as a benchmark for future comparative studies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020188397.     

Cardiac surgery in older patients: hospital outcomes during a 15-year period from a complete national series

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThe objective was to review national trends in activity and hospital outcomes in older patients having cardiac surgery over a 15-year time period.METHODSData were collected prospectively and uploaded to the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research electronically. Data were validated, cleaned and processed using reproducible algorithms. Mortality was death in hospital after index operation.RESULTSA total of 227 442 cardiac procedures were recorded in patients aged ≥70 years of which 46 354 were in those aged ≥80 years. Overall patients aged ≥70 years represented 43% of all adult cardiac surgery in the most recent study year. The annual proportion of surgery in patients ≥80 years increased from 4.1% to 10.8% between the first and last study years. There has been a significant linear increase in octogenarian valve [β 67.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55.04 to 79.83, P < 0.001] and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (β 32.53, 95% CI 6.16 to 58.90, P = 0.020) patients. In-hospital mortality reduced significantly for patients aged 70–79 years (β −0.17, 95% CI −0.20 to −0.13, P < 0.001) and all patients aged ≥80 (β −0.37, 95% CI −0.45 to −0.30, P < 0.001). The median length of hospital stay was 7 days for 70–79 and 9 days for ≥80 group, compared with 7 days for the whole cohort <70 years.CONCLUSIONSThis study represents the largest complete validated national dataset of cardiac surgery in the entire population of older patients. Octogenarians represent 11% of adult patients having cardiac surgery by the end of the study period, a three-fold increase from the start. In-hospital mortality in patients aged ≥80 years halved during study period to only 4% despite high logistic EuroSCORE of 15%. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians places a higher demand on resources, however, with an increased postoperative length of stay.     

Does robotic-assisted thymectomy have advantages over video-assisted thymectomy in short-term outcomes? A systematic view and meta-analysis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESA thymic epithelial tumour is the most common primary tumour in the anterior mediastinum of adults. A few retrospective studies compared the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted thymectomy (RAT) and video-assisted thymectomy (VAT). So, it is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis to further compare these 2 surgical techniques.METHODSEMBASE, Medline and Web of Science were used. Thesaurus terms and medical subject headings were used in Medline and EMBASE, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for grading because the included studies were all case-control studies.RESULTSNine studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 723 patients, including 315 patients in the RAT group and 408 patients in the VAT group. The meta-analysis [odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06–0.94; P = 0.041], indicating that RAT yielded a significantly lower rate of conversion compared with VAT. Duration of drainage with RAT was significantly less than that with VAT (weighted mean difference = −1.10; 95% CI −1.98 to −0.22; P = 0.014). The pooled analysis (weighted mean difference = −103.6; 95% CI −199.21 to −7.98; P = 0.034) suggested that patients in the RAT group had less drainage than those in the VAT group. The recurrence rates in both groups were comparable (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.03–1.20; P = 0.078).CONCLUSIONSRAT has advantages over VAT in terms of short-term outcomes such as shorter duration of drainage, less total drainage and a lower rate of conversion. The recurrence rate was comparable between the 2 techniques. Therefore, RAT could be considered as an alternative treatment for diseases of the thymus.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival outcomes after complete resection of thymic squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 116 patients

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for thymic squamous cell carcinoma after completely resection.METHODSPatients with thymic squamous cell carcinoma treated with complete resection between January 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to summarize the time-to-event variables. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.RESULTSA total of 116 patients were analysed with 44 patients in the non-ACT group and 72 patients in the ACT group. No significant difference was found in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (58.1% vs 51%, P = 0.33) or the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (77.7% vs 67.1%, P = 0.26) between the ACT group and the non-ACT group. Masaoka stage was the only independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS. Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in 5-year RFS for Masaoka stage II patients (P = 0.035) and 5-year OS (P = 0.036) for Masaoka stage III patients when comparing ACT with non-ACT. No chemotherapy-related death occurred. The most frequent adverse effect higher than grade 3 was neutropenia.CONCLUSIONSFor completely resected thymic squamous cell carcinoma, ACT significantly improved the 5-year RFS in Masaoka stage II patients and the 5-year OS in Masaoka stage III patients.