Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor

Species isoforms of histamine H2-, H3-, and H4-receptors differ in their pharmacological properties. The study aim was to dissect differences between the human H1R (hH1R) and guinea pig H1R (ghH1R). We coexpressed hH1R and gpH1R with regulators of G-protein signaling in Sf9 insect cells and analyzed the GTPase activity of Gq-proteins. Small H1R agonists showed similar effects at hH1R and gpH1R, whereas bulkier 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. Most 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were more efficacious at gpH1R than at hH1R. Several first-generation H1R antagonists were approximately 2-fold, and arpromidine-type H1R antagonists up to approximately 10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. [3H]Mepyramine competition binding studies confirmed the potency differences of the GTPase studies. Phe-153-->Leu-153 or Ile-433-->Val-433 exchange in hH1R (hH1R-->gpH1R) resulted in poor receptor expression, low [3H]mepyramine affinity, and functional inactivity. The Phe-153-->Leu-153/Ile-433-->Val-433 double mutant expressed excellently but only partially changed the pharmacological properties of hH1R. Small H1R agonists and 2-phenylhistamines interacted differentially with human and guinea pig H2R in terms of potency and efficacy, respectively. Our data show the following: 1) there are differences in agonist- and antagonist-pharmacology of hH1R and gpH1R encompassing diverse classes of bulky ligands. These differences may be explained by higher conformational flexibility of gpH1R relative to hH1R; 2) Phe-153 and Ile-433 are critical for proper folding and expression of hH1R; and 3) H2R species isoforms distinguish between H1R agonists.     

Pharmacological profile of histaprodifens at four recombinant histamine H1 receptor species isoforms

There are differences in the pharmacological properties of phenylhistamines and histaprodifens between guinea pig histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) and human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R). The aim of this study was to analyze species differences in more detail, focusing on histaprodifen derivatives and including the bovine histamine H(1) receptor (bH(1)R) and rat histamine H(1) receptor (rH(1)R). H(1)R species isoforms were coexpressed with the regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 in Sf9 insect cells. We performed [(3)H]mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays. For a novel class of histaprodifens, the chiral histaprodifens, unique species differences between hH(1)R, bH(1)R, rH(1)R, and gpH(1)R were observed. The chiral histaprodifens 8R and 8S were both partial agonists at gpH(1)R, but only 8R was a partial agonist at the other H(1)R species isoforms. An additional phenyl group in chiral histaprodifens 10R and 10S, respectively, resulted in a switch from agonism at gpH(1)Rto antagonism at hH(1)R, bH(1)R, and rH(1)R. In general, histaprodifens showed the order of potency hH(1)R < bH(1)R < rH(1)R < gpH(1)R. An active-state model of gpH(1)R was generated with molecular dynamics simulations. Dimeric histaprodifen was docked into the binding pocket of gpH(1)R. Hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions were detected between dimeric histaprodifen and Asp-116, Ser-120, Lys-187, Glu-190, and Tyr-432. We conclude the following: 1) chiral histaprodifens interact differentially with H(1)R species isoforms; 2) gpH(1)R and rH(1)R, on one hand, and hH(1)R and bH(1)R, on the other hand, resemble each other structurally and pharmacologically; and 3) histaprodifens interact with H(1)R at multiple sites.     

Probing ligand-specific histamine H1- and H2-receptor conformations with NG-acylated Imidazolylpropylguanidines

Impromidine (IMP) and arpromidine (ARP)-derived guanidines are more potent and efficacious guinea pig (gp) histamine H(2)-receptor (gpH(2)R) than human (h) H(2)R agonists and histamine H(1)-receptor (H(1)R) antagonists with preference for hH(1)R relative to gpH(1)R. We examined N(G)-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines (AIPGs), which are less basic than guanidines, at hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rat H(2)R (rH(2)R), hH(1)R, and gpH(1)R expressed in Sf9 cells as probes for ligand-specific receptor conformations. AIPGs were similarly potent H(2)R agonists as the corresponding guanidines IMP and ARP, respectively. Exchange of pyridyl in ARP against phenyl increased AIPG potency 10-fold, yielding the most potent agonists at the hH(2)R-G(salpha) fusion protein and gpH(2)R-G(salpha) identified so far. Some AIPGs were similarly potent and efficacious at hH(2)R-G(salpha) and gpH(2)R-G(salpha). AIPGs stabilized the ternary complex in hH(2)R-G(salpha) and gpH(2)R-G(salpha) differently than the corresponding guanidines. Guanidines, AIPGs, and small H(2)R agonists exhibited distinct agonist properties at hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R measuring adenylyl cyclase activity. In contrast to ARP and IMP, AIPGs were partial H(1)R agonists exhibiting higher efficacies at hH(1)R than at gpH(1)R. This is remarkable because, so far, all bulky H(1)R agonists exhibited higher efficacies at gpH(1)R than at hH(1)R. Collectively, our data suggest that AIPGs stabilize different active conformations in hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R than guanidines and that, in contrast to guanidines, AIPGs are capable of stabilizing a partially active state of hH(1)R.     

Two novel and selective nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists A-304121 and A-317920: I. In vitro pharmacological effects

Histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists enhance neurotransmitter release and are being developed for the treatment of a variety of neurological and cognitive disorders. Many potent histamine H3R antagonists contain an imidazole moiety that limits receptor selectivity and the tolerability of this class of compounds. Here we present the in vitro pharmacological data for two novel piperazine amide ligands, A-304121 [4-(3-((2R)-2-aminopropanoyl-1-piperazinyl)propoxy)phenyl)cyclopropylmethanone] and A-317920 [N-((1R)-2-(4-(3-(4-(cyclopropylcarbonyl)phenoxy)propyl)-1-piperazinyl)-1-methyl-2-oxo-ethyl-)-2-furamide], and compare them with the imidazole H3R antagonists ciproxifan, clobenpropit, and thioperamide. Both A-304121 and A-317920 bind potently to recombinant full-length rat H3R(pKi values = 8.6 and 9.2, respectively) but have lower potencies for binding the full-length human H3R (pKi values = 6.1 and 7.0, respectively). A-304121 and A-317920 are potent antagonists at rat H3R in reversing R-alpha-methylhistamine [(R)-alpha-MeHA] inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (pKb values = 8.0 and 9.1) but weak antagonists at human H3Rs in cyclase (pKb values = 6.0 and 6.3) and calcium mobilization (pKb values = 6.0 and 7.3) assays in cells co-expressing Galphaqi5-protein. Both compounds potently antagonize native H3Rs by blocking histamine inhibition of potassium-evoked [3H]histamine release from rat brain cortical synaptosomes (pKb values = 8.6 and 9.3) and (R)-alpha-MeHA reversal of electric field-stimulated guinea pig ileum contractions (pA2 values = 7.1 and 8.3). A-304121 and A-317920 are also more efficacious inverse agonists in reversing basal guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding at the human H3R (pEC50 values = 5.7 and 7.0) than are the imidazole antagonists. These novel and selective piperazine amides represent useful leads for the development of H3R antagonist therapeutic agents.     

Differential efficacies of somatostatin receptor agonists for G-protein activation and desensitization of somatostatin receptor subtype 4-mediated responses

Both the histamine H1-receptor (H1R) and H2-receptor (H2R) exhibit pronounced species selectivity in their pharmacological properties; i.e., bulky agonists possess higher potencies and efficacies at guinea pig (gp) than at the corresponding human (h) receptor isoforms. In this study, we examined the effects of NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines substituted with a single phenyl or cyclohexyl substituent on H1R and H2R species isoforms expressed in Sf9 insect cells. N1-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57) turned out to be the most potent hH2R agonist identified so far (EC50 of 23 nM in the GTPase assay at the hH2R-Gsalpha fusion protein expressed in Sf9 insect cells). UR-AK57 was almost a full-hH2R agonist and only slightly less potent and efficacious than at gpH2R-Gsalpha. Several NG-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines showed similar potency at hH2R and gpH2R. Most unexpectedly, UR-AK57 exhibited moderately strong partial hH1R agonism with a potency similar to that of histamine, whereas at gpH1R, UR-AK57 was only a very weak partial agonist. Structure/activity relationship studies revealed that both the alkanoyl chain connecting the aromatic or alicyclic substituent with the guanidine moiety and the nature of the carbocycle (cyclohexyl versus phenyl ring) critically determine the pharmacological properties of this class of compounds. Collectively, our data show that gpH1R and gpH R do not necessarily exhibit preference for bulky agonists (2) compared with hH1R and hH2R, respectively, and that UR-AK57 is a promising starting point for the development of both potent and efficacious hH1R and hH2R agonists.     

An 80-amino acid deletion in the third intracellular loop of a naturally occurring human histamine H3 isoform confers pharmacological differences and constitutive activity

In this article, we pharmacologically characterized two naturally occurring human histamine H3 receptor (hH3R) isoforms, hH3R(445) and hH3R(365). These abundantly expressed splice variants differ by a deletion of 80 amino acids in the intracellular loop 3. In this report, we show that the hH3R(365) is differentially expressed compared with the hH3R(445) and has a higher affinity and potency for H3R agonists and conversely a lower potency and affinity for H3R inverse agonists. Furthermore, we show a higher constitutive signaling of the hH3R(365) compared with the hH3R(445) in both guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio) triphosphate binding and cAMP assays, likely explaining the observed differences in hH3R pharmacology of the two isoforms. Because H3R ligands are beneficial in animal models of obesity, epilepsy, and cognitive diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and currently entered clinical trails, these differences in H3R pharmacology of these two isoforms are of great importance for a detailed understanding of the action of H3R ligands.     

Ligand-specific contribution of the N terminus and E2-loop to pharmacological properties of the histamine H1-receptor

There are species differences between human histamine H(1) receptor (hH(1)R) and guinea pig (gp) histamine H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) for phenylhistamines and histaprodifens. Several studies showed participation of the second extracellular loop (E2-loop) in ligand binding for some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Because there are large species differences in the amino acid sequence between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R for the N terminus and E2-loop, we generated chimeric hH(1)Rs with gp E2-loop (h(gpE2)H(1)R) and gp N terminus and gp E2-loop (h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R). hH(1)R, gpH(1)R, and chimeras were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. [(3)H]Mepyramine binding assays and steady-state GTPase assays were performed. In the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R, we observed a significant decrease in potency of histamine 1 in the GTPase assay. For phenoprodifen 5 and the chiral phenoprodifens 6R and 6S, a significant decrease in affinity and potency was found in the series hH(1)R > h(gpE2)H(1)R > h(gpNgpE2)H(1)R. In addition, we constructed new active-state H(1)R models based on the crystal structure of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (hbeta(2)AR). Compared with the H(1)R active-state models based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin, the E2-loop differs in its contact to the ligand bound in the binding pocket. In the bovine rhodopsin-based model, the backbone carbonyl of Lys187 (gpH(1)R) interacts with large histaprodifens in the binding pocket, but in the hbeta(2)AR-based model, Lys187 (gpH(1)R) is located distantly from the binding pocket. In conclusion, the differences in N terminus and E2-loop between hH(1)R and gpH(1)R exert an influence on affinity and/or potency for histamine and phenoprodifens 5, 6R, and 6S.     

Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the human histamine H2 receptor determine the species selectivity of guanidine-type agonists and increase constitutive activity

In a steady-state GTPase activity assay, N-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl)]guanidines and N(G)-acylated derivatives are more potent and efficacious at fusion proteins of guinea pig (gpH(2)R-G(salphaS)) than human (hH(2)R-G(salphaS)) histamine H(2) receptor, coupled to the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS). Whereas Ala-271 (hH(2)R) and Asp-271 (gpH(2)R) in transmembrane domain 7 were identified to determine the potency differences of guanidine-type agonists, the molecular basis for the efficacy differences remains to be elucidated. A homology model of the gpH(2)R suggested that an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 stabilizes an active receptor conformation of the gpH(2)R. In the present study, we generated a mutant hH(2)R-G(salphaS) with Cys-17--> Tyr-17/Ala-271--> Asp-271 exchanges (hH(2)R-->gpH(2)R) that exhibited an enhanced level of constitutive GTPase activity and adenylyl cyclase activity compared with wild-type hH(2)R-G(salphaS) and gpH(2)R-G(salphaS). Potencies and efficacies of guanidines and N(G)-acylguanidines were increased at this mutant receptor compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), but they were still lower than at gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), suggesting that aside from Tyr-17 and Asp-271 additional amino acids contribute to the distinct pharmacological profiles of both species isoforms. Another hH(2)R-G(salphaS) mutant with a Cys-17--> Tyr-17 exchange showed inefficient coupling to G(salphaS) as revealed by reduced agonist-stimulated GTPase and basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Collectively, our present pharmacological study confirms the existence of an H-bond between Tyr-17 and Asp-271 favoring the stabilization of an active receptor conformation. Distinct potencies and efficacies of agonists and inverse agonists further support the concept of ligand-specific conformations in wild-type and mutant H(2)R-G(salphaS) fusion proteins.     

Effects of histamine, H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on the activity of serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus

We investigated the effects of histamine applied by microiontophoresis onto serotonin-containing (serotonergic) cells recorded extracellularly in the dorsal raphe nucleus of the rat. Application of histamine at low iontophoretic currents (1-5 nA) produced a rapid depression of the firing of all serotonergic neurons tested. The H1-receptor antagonists mepyramine and diphenhydramine were unable to attenuate the histamine-induced response. Antagonism of the effect of histamine by the iontophoretic application of the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine and metiamide was not possible to evaluate since both were found to exert potent inhibitory effects by themselves. In contrast, the nonimidazole-derived H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine, which had no effect by itself, selectively antagonized the histamine-induced depression of neuronal activity. Histidine, 3-methylhistamine and a variety of histamine agonists selective for H1- or H2-receptors were unable to mimic the effect of histamine in dorsal raphe. Histamine's effects may, in part, be mediated at a gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor complex as the gamma-aminobutyric acid antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin rapidly and reversibly antagonized both the histamine- and the cimetidine-induced depression of serotonin cell firing; the glycine antagonist strychnine selectively blocked the inhibitory effect of glycine without altering the histamine-induced response. These data show an inhibitory effect of histamine on serotonin-containing neurons in the dorsal raphe; this effect may be partially mediated at a subtype of H2-receptor. These data further indicate that the inhibitory effects of histamine and cimetidine observed in the dorsal raphe nucleus may result, in part, from an action directly or indirectly at a gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor complex.     

S-[2-(4-imidazolyl)ethyl]isothiourea, a highly specific and potent histamine H3 receptor agonist.

The effects of a new agonist of histamine (HA) H3 receptors, Imetit (S-[2-(4-(imidazolyl)ethyl]isothiourea) were investigated in vitro and in vivo and compared to those of (R)-alpha-methylhistamine [(R)-alpha-MeHA], a prototypic drug. Imetit inhibited the binding of [3H](R-alpha-MeHA to rat brain membranes with a Ki value of 0.1 +/- 0.01 nM. The release of endogenously synthesized [3H]HA induced by K(+)-depolarization from rat brain slices and synaptosomes was inhibited by Imetit with EC50 values of 1.0 +/- 0.3 and 2.8 +/- 0.7 nM, respectively. Imetit behaved as a full agonist and was about 4 times more potent than (R)-alpha-MeHA and 60 times more potent than HA. Thioperamide, a selective H3 receptor antagonist, elicited a parallel rightward shift of the concentration-response curve for Imetit with an apparent Ki value of 5.6 +/- 1.4 nM. Imetit potencies relative to HA were less than 0.1% and only 0.6% at HA H1 and H2 receptor reference systems, respectively. Imetit was found not to be a substrate or an inhibitor of HMT. After p.o. administration to mice or rats, Imetit decreased (by approximately 50%) the tele-MeHA level in the cerebral cortex with ED50 values of 1.0 +/- 0.3 and 1.6 +/- 0.3 mg/kg, respectively. This effect was still maximal after 6 hr. The in vivo potency and duration of action of Imetit were in the same range as those of (R)-alpha-MeHA. It is therefore concluded that Imetit represents a new potent and selective HA H3 receptor agonist.     

A potent and selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties

Histamine mediates its physiological function through binding to four known histamine receptors. Here, we describe the first selective antagonist of the histamine H4 receptor, the newest member of the histamine receptor family, and provide evidence that such antagonists have anti-inflammatory activity in vivo. 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine (JNJ 7777120) has a K(i) of 4.5 nM versus the human receptor and a pA(2) of 8.1. It is equipotent against the human, mouse, and rat receptors. It exhibits at least 1000-fold selectivity over H1, H2, or H3 receptors and has no cross-reactivity against 50 other targets. This compound has an oral bioavailability of approximately 30% in rats and 100% in dogs, with a half-life of approximately 3 h in both species. JNJ 7777120 blocks histamine-induced chemotaxis and calcium influx in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells. In addition, it can block the histamine-induced migration of tracheal mast cells from the connective tissue toward the epithelium in mice. JNJ 7777120 significantly blocks neutrophil infiltration in a mouse zymosan-induced peritonitis model. This model is reported to be mast cell-dependent, which suggests that the compound effect may be mediated by mast cells. These results indicate that the histamine H4 receptor plays a role in the inflammatory process. Selective H4 receptor antagonists like JNJ 7777120 may have the potential to be useful in treating inflammation in humans.     

Pharmacological properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile]: I. Potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist with drug-like properties

Histamine H3 receptor antagonists are being developed to treat a variety of neurological and cognitive disorders that may be ameliorated by enhancement of central neurotransmitter release. Here, we present the in vitro pharmacological and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles for the nonimidazole, benzofuran ligand ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile] and compare it with several previously described imidazole and nonimidazole H3 receptor antagonists. ABT-239 binds to recombinant human and rat H3 receptors with high affinity, with pK(i) values of 9.4 and 8.9, respectively, and is over 1000-fold selective versus human H1, H2, and H4 histamine receptors. ABT-239 is a potent H3 receptor antagonist at recombinant human and rat receptors, reversing agonist-induced changes in cAMP formation (pK(b) = 7.9 and 7.6, respectively), guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio) triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding (pK(b) = 9.0 and 8.3, respectively), and calcium mobilization (human pK(b) = 7.9). ABT-239 also competitively reversed histamine-mediated inhibition of [3H]histamine release from rat brain cortical synaptosomes (pK(b) = 7.7) and agonist-induced inhibition of contractile responses in electric field stimulated guinea pig ileal segments (pA2 = 8.7). Additionally, ABT-239 is a potent inverse agonist, inhibiting constitutive [35S]GTPgammaS binding at both rat and human H3 receptors with respective pEC50 values of 8.9 and 8.2. ABT-239 demonstrates good pharmacokinetic characteristics in rat, dog, and monkey with t1/2 values ranging from 4 to 29 h, corresponding with clearance values and metabolic turnover in liver microsomes from these species, and good oral bioavailability ranging from 52 to 89%. Thus, ABT-239 is a selective, nonimidazole H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist with similar high potency in both human and rat and favorable drug-like properties.     

Effects of histamine H2 receptor agonists and antagonists on the isolated guinea pig gallbladder

Histamine H2 receptor-mediated responses were examined on cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-8)-precontracted guinea pig gallbladder in vitro, testing histamine and a series of specific histamine H2 receptor agonists and antagonists. Among the antagonists tested, zolantidine and compound SKF 92857 were previously shown to antagonize H2 receptor-mediated responses in the heart, but not in the stomach. Histamine, in the presence of the H2 receptor antagonist mepyramine (10 microM), and the H2 receptor agonists dimaprit, impromidine and amthamine, inhibited CCK-8 (3 nM)-induced contractions in a concentration-dependent fashion, with the following rank orders of potency: impromidine > amthamine > histamine > dimaprit (pD2 values were 6.73 +/- 0.04, 5.44 +/- 0.07, 4.64 +/- 0.04 and 3.71 +/- 0.05, respectively). The maximal relaxation produced by dimaprit was significantly lower than that produced by histamine, as well as by impromidine and amthamine, which behaved as full agonists. All the H2 receptor antagonists examined were able to inhibit amthamine-induced relaxation. Famotidine (pA2 = 7.09 +/- 0.26), zolantidine (pA2 = 6.54 +/- 0.11), compound SKF 92857 (pA2 = 6.58 +/- 0.13) and aminopotentidine (pA2 = 6.86 +/- 0.06) competitively antagonised the amthamine-induced effect, while iodoaminopotentidine produced surmountable antagonism only at low concentrations (1 microM, pA2 = 6.83 +/- 0.21). Finally, the slowly-dissociable antagonist loxtidine caused a non-parallel displacement to the right of the concentration--response curve to amthamine (pKB = 7.55 +/- 0.24), with a significant depression of the maximal response to the agonist, even at the lowest effective concentration (0.3 microM). In conclusion, histamine H2 receptors in guinea pig gallbladder resemble those of the heart, as regards their sensitivity to zolantidine and compound SKF 92857, which, by contrast, were unable to antagonize histamine effects at gastric H2 receptors in different experimental models.     

Identification and pharmacological characterization of a series of new 1H-4-substituted-imidazoyl histamine H3 receptor ligands

A new series of 1H-4-substituted imidazole compounds were synthesized and identified as potent and selective histamine (HA) H3 receptor ligands. These ligands establish that HA H3 antagonists exhibit stereoselective and conformational preferences in their binding to the HA H3 receptor. Structure-activity relationships were determined in vitro by HA H3 receptor-binding affinities using [3H]Nalpha-methylhistamine and rat cerebral cortical tissue homogenates. Several derivatives containing olefin, amide, and acetylene functional groups were identified as potent HA H3 receptor ligands. In the olefin series, GT-2227 (4-(6-cyclohexylhex-cis-3-enyl)imidazole) was identified as a potent HA H3 receptor ligand with a Ki of 4.2 +/- 0.6 nM, while the trans isomer (GT-2228) displayed a reduced potency (Ki = 15.2 +/- 2.4 nM). GT-2227 was also found to have excellent central nervous system penetration in an ex vivo binding paradigm (ED50 = 0.7 mg/kg i.p.). In the acetylene series, GT-2260 and GT-2286 both exhibited high affinity (Ki = 2.9 +/- 0.2 and 0.95 +/- 0.3 nM) and excellent central nervous system penetration profiles (ED50 = 0.43 and 0.48 mg/kg i.p., respectively). As a prototype for the series, GT-2227 showed high affinity for the human HA H3 receptor (3.2 nM) and minimal affinity for the human HA H1 (Ki = 13,407 +/- 540 nM) and H2 (Ki = 4,469 +/- 564 nM) receptor subtypes. GT-2227 also showed good selectivity for the HA H3 receptor over a broad spectrum of other neurotransmitter receptors (IC50 >/= 1 microM). Furthermore, GT-2227 improved acquisition in a cognitive paradigm without behavioral excitation or effect on spontaneous locomotor activity. In summary, the present studies demonstrate the development of novel HA H3-selective ligands, and lend support for the use of such agents in the treatment of disorders associated with cognitive or attentional deficits.     

Cloning of rat histamine H(3) receptor reveals distinct species pharmacological profiles

The recent cloning and characterization of the human histamine H(3) receptor cDNA marked a significant step toward a greater understanding of the role of this receptor in the central nervous system. We now report the cloning of the rat histamine H(3) receptor cDNA and demonstrate distinct pharmacological species differences. The rat cDNA clone encodes a putative 445-amino acid protein with 93% identity to the human H(3) receptor. Northern blot analysis revealed a major single entity of 2.7-kb in length expressed only in brain. Transfection of the rat receptor cDNA into SK-N-MC cells conferred an ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation in response to histamine and other H(3) agonists. N-[(3)H]methylhistamine saturably bound to transfected cells with high affinity (K(d) = 0.8 nM). All agonists tested had low or subnanomolar K(i) values similar to that for the human recombinant receptor. The antagonists thioperamide and clobenpropit also bound with high affinity (K(i) = 4 and 0.4 nM, respectively). This is in contrast to the antagonist profile obtained for the human recombinant receptor that showed K(i) values of 58 and 0.6 nM for thioperamide and clobenpropit, respectively. These data suggest that the low affinity of thioperamide for the human H(3) receptor represents a species difference in pharmacology and not a unique pharmacological subtype. It also was found that chloroproxyfan behaved as a full agonist at the rat recombinant receptor. These findings highlight the significance of validating the pharmacology of experimental compounds at both the rat and human H(3) receptors.     

Pharmacological properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile]: II. Neurophysiological characterization and broad preclinical efficacy in cognition and schizophrenia of a potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist

Acute pharmacological blockade of central histamine H3 receptors (H3Rs) enhances arousal/attention in rodents. However, there is little information available for other behavioral domains or for repeated administration using selective compounds. ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile] exemplifies such a selective, nonimidazole H3R antagonist with high affinity for rat (pK(i) = 8.9) and human (pK(i) = 9.5) H3Rs. Acute functional blockade of central H3Rs was demonstrated by blocking the dipsogenia response to the selective H3R agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine in mice. In cognition studies, acquisition of a five-trial, inhibitory avoidance test in rat pups was improved with ABT-239 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), a 10- to 150-fold gain in potency, with similar efficacy, over previous antagonists such as thioperamide, ciproxifan, A-304121 [(4-(3-(4-((2R)-2-aminopropanoyl)-1-piperazinyl)propoxy)phenyl)(cyclopropyl) methanone], A-317920 [N-((1R)-2-(4-(3-(4-(cyclopropylcarbonyl) phenoxy)propyl)-1-piperazinyl)-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl)-2-furamide], and A-349821 [(4'-(3-((R,R)2,5-dimethyl-pyrrolidin-1-yl)-propoxy)-biphenyl-4-yl)-morpholin-4-yl-methanone]. Efficacy in this model was maintained for 3 to 6 h and following repeated dosing with ABT-239. Social memory was also improved in adult (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and aged (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) rats. In schizophrenia models, ABT-239 improved gating deficits in DBA/2 mice using prepulse inhibition of startle (1.0-3.0 mg/kg) and N40 (1.0-10.0 mg/kg). Furthermore, ABT-239 (1.0 mg/kg) attenuated methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice. In freely moving rat microdialysis studies, ABT-239 enhanced acetylcholine release (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) in adult rat frontal cortex and hippocampus and enhanced dopamine release in frontal cortex (3.0 mg/kg), but not striatum. In summary, broad efficacy was observed with ABT-239 across animal models such that potential clinical efficacy may extend beyond disorders such as ADHD to include Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia.     

GSK189254, a novel H3 receptor antagonist that binds to histamine H3 receptors in Alzheimer's disease brain and improves cognitive performance in preclinical models

6-[(3-Cyclobutyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepin-7-yl)oxy]-N-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxamide hydrochloride (GSK189254) is a novel histamine H(3) receptor antagonist with high affinity for human (pK(i) = 9.59 -9.90) and rat (pK(i) = 8.51-9.17) H(3) receptors. GSK189254 is >10,000-fold selective for human H(3) receptors versus other targets tested, and it exhibited potent functional antagonism (pA(2) = 9.06 versus agonist-induced changes in cAMP) and inverse agonism [pIC(50) = 8.20 versus basal guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding] at the human recombinant H(3) receptor. In vitro autoradiography demonstrated specific [(3)H]GSK189254 binding in rat and human brain areas, including cortex and hippocampus. In addition, dense H(3) binding was detected in medial temporal cortex samples from severe cases of Alzheimer's disease, suggesting for the first time that H(3) receptors are preserved in late-stage disease. After oral administration, GSK189254 inhibited cortical ex vivo R-(-)-alpha-methyl[imidazole-2,5(n)-(3)H]histamine dihydrochloride ([(3)H]R-alpha-methylhistamine) binding (ED(50) = 0.17 mg/kg) and increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in prefrontal and somatosensory cortex (3 mg/kg). Microdialysis studies demonstrated that GSK189254 (0.3-3 mg/kg p.o.) increased the release of acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and dopamine in the anterior cingulate cortex and acetylcholine in the dorsal hippocampus. Functional antagonism of central H(3) receptors was demonstrated by blockade of R-alpha-methylhistamine-induced dipsogenia in rats (ID(50) = 0.03 mg/kg p.o.). GSK189254 significantly improved performance of rats in diverse cognition paradigms, including passive avoidance (1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.), water maze (1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.), object recognition (0.3 and 1 mg/kg p.o.), and attentional set shift (1 mg/kg p.o.). These data suggest that GSK189254 may have therapeutic potential for the symptomatic treatment of dementia in Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive disorders.     

Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors

Previous studies revealed pharmacological differences between human and guinea pig histamine H(2) receptors (H(2)Rs) with respect to the interaction with guanidine-type agonists. Because H(2)R species variants are structurally very similar, comparative studies are suited to relate different properties of H(2)R species isoforms to few molecular determinants. Therefore, we systematically compared H(2)Rs of human (h), guinea pig (gp), rat (r), and canine (c). Fusion proteins of hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, rH(2)R, and cH(2)R, respectively, and the short splice variant of G(salpha), G(salphaS), were expressed in Sf9 insect cells. In the membrane steady-state GTPase activity assay, cH(2)R-G(salphaS) but neither gpH(2)R-G(salphaS) nor rH(2)R-G(salphaS) showed the hallmarks of increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R-G(salphaS), i.e., increased efficacies of partial agonists, increased potencies of agonists with the extent of potency increase being correlated with the corresponding efficacies at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), increased inverse agonist efficacies, and decreased potencies of antagonists. Furthermore, in membranes expressing nonfused H(2)Rs without or together with mammalian G(salphaS) or H(2)R-G(salpha) fusion proteins, the highest basal and GTP-dependent increases in adenylyl cyclase activity were observed for cH(2)R. An example of ligand selectivity is given by metiamide, acting as an inverse agonist at hH(2)R-G(salphaS), gpH(2)R-G(salphaS), and rH(2)R-G(salphaS) in the GTPase assay in contrast to being a weak partial agonist with decreased potency at cH(2)R-G(salphaS). In conclusion, the cH(2)R exhibits increased constitutive activity compared with hH(2)R, gpH(2)R, and rH(2)R, and there is evidence for ligand-specific conformations in H(2)R species isoforms.     

Development of trans-2-[1H-imidazol-4-yl] cyclopropane derivatives as new high-affinity histamine H3 receptor ligands

Previously, a novel series of 1H-4-substituted imidazole compounds were described as potent and selective histamine (HA) H3 receptor ligands (Yates et al., 1999). The present studies extend the structure-activity relationships for optimal HA H3 receptor affinity and central nervous system penetration by incorporation of a conformationally restricted cyclopropane nucleus. Moreover, the current studies extend our understanding of ligand-receptor interactions at the HA H3 receptor with the development of high affinity HA H3 receptor antagonists containing a stereochemical presentation. Structure-activity relationships were established from in vitro HA H3 receptor-binding affinities using [3H]Nalpha-methylhistamine and rat cortical tissue homogenates. Systematic optimization of multiple structural features critical for HA H3 receptor affinity provided some of the most potent HA H3 receptor agents described. For example, GT-2331 was determined to bind to a single population of HA H3 receptors with a Ki of 0.125 nM. In vivo, GT-2331 has a favorable central nervous system penetration profile with an ED50 of 0.08 mg/kg (i.p.) in rats and a long duration of action (T1/2 > 4 h). In addition, GT-2331 was extremely selective for the HA H3 receptor versus other HA receptors and a battery of neurotransmitter, neuropeptide, hormone, or enzyme systems. Several compounds were tested in vitro which suggested HA H3 receptor heterogeneity and are discussed in terms of structure-activity relationships for the HA H3 receptor.     

Designing,docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies of novel cloperastine analogues as anti-allergic agents: homology modeling and active site prediction for the human histamine H1 receptor

The present study predicts a three-dimensional model for the histamine H1 receptor and the design of antihistamine inhibitors using cloperastine as the core molecule by docking studies. In this work, we predicted a three-dimensional structure of the histamine H1 receptor using the MODELLER9V7 software. The protein structure was developed based on the crystal structure of the histamine H1 receptor, the lysozyme chimera of Escherichia virus T4 (PDB ID: 3RZE_A) target collected from the PDB data bank. Using molecular dynamics simulation methods, the final predicted structure is obtained and further analyzed by VERIFY3D and PROCHECK programs, confirming that the final model is reliable. The drug derivatives of cloperastine were designed and docking was performed with the designed ligands along with the drug. The predicted model of the histamine H1 receptor structure is stable and confirms that it is a reliable structure for docking studies. The results indicate that MET 183, THR 184 and ILE 187 in the histamine H1 receptor are important determinant residues for binding as they have strong hydrogen bonding with cloperastine derivatives. The drug derivatives were docked to the histamine H1 receptor protein by hydrogen bonding interactions and these interactions played an important role in the binding studies. The molecule 1-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl) (phenyl) methoxy] ethyl}-4-methylenepiperidine showed the best docking results with the histamine H1 receptor. The docking results predicted the best compounds, which may act as better drugs than cloperastine and in the future, these may be developed for anti-allergy therapy.

The present study predicts a three-dimensional model for the histamine H1 receptor and the design of antihistamine inhibitors using cloperastine as the core molecule by docking studies.