Randomized Controlled Trial of High‐Dose Intradermal Versus Standard‐Dose Intramuscular Influenza Vaccine in Organ Transplant Recipients

The immunogenicity of standard intramuscular (IM) influenza vaccine is suboptimal in transplant recipients. Also, recent studies suggest that alloantibody may be upregulated due to vaccination. We evaluated a novel high‐dose intradermal (ID) vaccine strategy. In conjunction, we assessed alloimmunity. Transplant recipients were randomized to receive IM or high‐dose ID vaccine. Strain‐specific serology and HLA alloantibody production was determined pre‐ and postimmunization. In 212 evaluable patients (105 IM, 107 ID), seroprotection to H1N1, H3N2 and B strains was 70.5%, 63.8% and 52.4% in the IM group, and 71.0%, 70.1%, 63.6% in the ID group (p = ns). Seroconversion to ≥1 antigen was 46.7% and 51.4% in the IM and ID groups respectively (p = 0.49). Response was more likely in those ≥6 months posttransplant (53.2% vs. 19.2%; p = 0.001). Use of mycophenolate mofetil was inversely associated with vaccine response in a dose‐dependent manner (p < 0.001). Certain organ subgroups had higher response rates for influenza B in the ID vaccine group. Differences in anti‐HLA antibody production were detected in only 3/212(1.4%) patients with no clinical consequences. High‐dose intradermal vaccine is an alternative to standard vaccine and has potential enhanced immunogenicity in certain subgroups. In this large cohort, we also show that seasonal influenza does not result in significant alloantibody production.     

Influenza Vaccination in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients: Absence of Post Administration ALT Elevation

Influenza vaccination has reduced life-threatening complications from influenza virus infection in adult liver transplant recipients. We evaluated changes in aminotransferase level and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in liver transplant recipients. Fifty-one liver transplant recipients were administered a standard dose of the 2002-2003 inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine. ALT values were measured at baseline, 1 week and 4-6 weeks postvaccination. Antibody responses to each component of the vaccine were measured at baseline and after 4-6 weeks by a hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. Response was defined as an HAI titer > or = 1: 40 and/or a 4-fold increase in antibody titers from baseline. An ALT elevation was defined as a rise of > or = 50% from baseline. There was no difference in the median rise in ALT value between seroconverters and nonseroconverters. A significant number of recipients developed potentially protective antibody titers (p-value < 0.0001). At less than 4 months post transplantation, 1/7 (14%), at 4-12 months, 6/9 (67%), and after 12 months, 30/35 (86%) subjects responded to the H1 strain. Of 51 recipients, one HCV (-) recipients vaccinated within 3 months of transplantation developed acute cellular rejection. Influenza virus vaccination is not associated with allograft rejection or ALT flares in liver transplant recipients.     

Immunogenicity of Intradermal Hepatitis B Vaccination in Renal Transplant Recipients

We investigated intradermal hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination in 24 renal transplant recipients who failed to develop hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) with intramuscular (i.m.) vaccination. All patients received recombinant HBV vaccine 5 microg intradermally every 2 weeks for 8 doses. Nine patients developed protective levels of anti-HBs (> 10 miu/mL) and two patients developed low levels of anti-HBs (4-6 miu/mL), giving an overall initial response rate of 45.8%. A booster of 40 microg was administered intramuscularly after 1 year. All initial responders developed an anti-HBs response (322.6 +/- 92.0 miu/mL). In addition, four patients who did not respond initially to the intradermal vaccination seroconverted after the booster. Responders (62.5%) and nonresponders had comparable age, gender, immunosuppressive medications, and duration of transplant. In conclusion, renal transplant patients who fail to respond to intramuscular HBV vaccination may benefit from intradermal vaccination followed by an intramuscular booster.     

Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk of morbidity from human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related diseases. Quadrivalent HPV vaccine is recommended for posttransplant patients but there are no data on vaccine immunogenicity. We determined the immunogenicity of HPV vaccine in a cohort of young adult transplant patients. Patients were immunized with three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine containing viral types 6, 11, 16 and 18. Immunogenicity was determined by type‐specific viral‐like protein ELISA. Four weeks after the last dose of vaccine, a vaccine response was seen in 63.2%, 68.4%, 63.2% and 52.6% for HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18, respectively. Factors that led to reduced immunogenicity were vaccination early after transplant (p = 0.019), having a lung transplant (p = 0.007) and having higher tacrolimus levels (p = 0.048). At 12 months, there were significant declines in antibody titer for all HPV types although the number of patients who remained seropositive did not significantly differ. The vaccine was safe and well tolerated. We show suboptimal immunogenicity of HPV vaccine in transplant patients. This is important for counseling patients who choose to receive this vaccine. Further studies are needed to determine an optimal HPV vaccine type and schedule for this population.     

Seasonal Maintenance of Influenza Vaccine-Induced Antibody Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background/Aims: Although annual influenza vaccination is recommended for kidney transplant recipients, efficacy as reflected by serum antibody titers has not been well studied beyond 1 month in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study of 51 kidney transplant recipients and 102 healthy controls receiving the 2006-2007 influenza vaccine. Anti-hemagglutinin antibody titers to A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B were measured before and 1 month after vaccination, and again at the end of influenza season. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining seroprotection (antibody titer ≥1:32) for the duration of the influenza season after influenza vaccination. Results: Median follow-up time was 175 and 155 days in the transplant and control groups, respectively. For types A/H1N1 and B, a similar high proportion of the transplant and control groups (88.5 and 81.6% vs. 83.7 and 74.2% for A/H1N1 and B, respectively) maintained seroprotection. For type A/H3N2, significantly less of the transplant group (66.7%) versus the control group (90%) maintained a protective influenza vaccine response (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.64). This difference disappeared in adjusted analyses. Actual geometric mean titers decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.001) but this did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Once they have developed protective vaccine-induced antibody responses to influenza vaccine, kidney transplant recipients are able to maintain adequate protective levels of antibody compared with healthy controls.     

A successful two-step integrated protocol of anti-HBV vaccination in chronic uremia.

A prospective study was performed in 40 chronic uremics which included: (1) the intramuscular administration to all patients of 40 micrograms of a DNA-recombinant vaccine (Engerix-B) at 0, 1, 2, 6 months; (2) an intramuscular booster dose of 40 micrograms at 18 months in patients having an anti-HBs titer greater than 100 mIU/ml at the 7th month (group A); (3) a further intramuscular supplementary dose of 40 micrograms at 12 months (besides that at 18 months) in patients developing an antibody titer less than 100 mIU/ml at the 7th months (group B); (4) an intradermal course of 5 micrograms of vaccine every 2 weeks until the protective titer (greater than or equal to 10 mIU/ml) was achieved, and then every month for a total of 6 months in patients who did not develop a protective titer even after 19 months (group C). At the end of the study, all patients had developed a protective titer: 77.5% after the 4th intramuscular dose, 12.5% after the 5th and 10% after 3.5 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SEM) intradermal inoculations. The mean antibody titers were 1,461 +/- 98 mIU/ml in group A, 594 +/- 684 in group B and 131 +/- 133 in group C. In conclusion, our two-step integrated protocol gives an anti-HBs protective titer in all our patients.     

Heterologous Immune Responses to Influenza Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Influenza vaccine is known to have suboptimal immunogenicity in transplant recipients. Despite this, influenza vaccine may have the added benefit of inducing a cross‐reactive immune response to viral strains not found in the vaccine. This is termed “heterologous immunity” and has not been assessed previously in transplant patients. Pre‐ and postvaccination sera from kidney transplant recipients (n = 60) immunized with the 2012–2013 adjuvanted or nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine underwent testing by hemagglutination inhibition assay for strains not present in vaccine: A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2) and B/Brisbane/60/2008. The geometric mean titer of antibody to heterologous strains increased after vaccine (H1N1: 80.0 to 136.1, p < 0.001; H3N2: 23.3 to 77.3, p < 0.001; B: 13.3 to 19.5, p < 0.001). Seroconversion rates were 16.7%, 41.7%, and 13.3%, respectively. No differences in heterologous response were seen in the adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted groups. Patients were more likely to seroconvert for a cross‐reactive antigen if they seroconverted for the specific vaccine antigen. Seroconversion to heterologous A/H3N2, for example, was 84.0% for homologous H3N2 seroconverters versus 11.4% for nonseroconverters (p < 0.001). This study provides novel evidence that transplant recipients are able to mount significant cross‐protective responses to influenza vaccine that may be an additional, previously unknown benefit of immunization.     

Impairment of the immune response to influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients by cyclosporine, but not azathioprine

Influenza vaccination has been strongly recommended for immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. However, immunosuppression may lead to impaired antibody responses. We studied the antibody response to an inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in 59 renal transplant recipients with life-sustaining kidney function: 21 were on cyclosporine and prednisone, 38 on azathioprine and prednisone. Healthy volunteers (n = 29) and patients on hemodialysis (n = 28) served as controls. Despite comparable renal allograft function, cyclosporine-treated patients had a significantly lower immune response against influenza A viruses than azathioprine-treated patients, whether mean antibody levels, fourfold titer rise, or seroconversion to protective titers was analyzed. No significant differences in antibody responses were found between healthy controls and patients on azathioprine. The patients on hemodialysis showed an impaired response to vaccination. However, in contrast to the cyclosporine-treated patients, booster immunization proved valuable in this group.     

Response of renal allograft recipients to pneumococcal vaccine.

Antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine were compared in a control group of 17 normal adults and in a group of 27 adult patients with stable renal function (serum creatinine 0.8--2.1 mg/dl) seven months to nine years following renal transplantation. Using the indirect hemagglutination technique, antibody titers to 13 of the 14 capsular antigens contained in the vaccine were determined for each patient just prior to and again three weeks following immunization. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of patients responding with a fourfold rise in titer to 12 of the 13 antigens tested. The response rate to antigen type 3 was reduced in the transplant group (p less than 0.05). Mean fold increase in indirect hemagglutination titers was likewise determined for each antigen, and a reduced response in the transplant group was noted only to antigen type 23 (p = 0.037). Immunosuppressed renal allograft recipients appear capable of mounting a nearly normal antibody response to pneumococcal vaccine.     

Influenza vaccination in the organ transplant recipient: review and summary recommendations

Influenza virus causes a spectrum of illness in transplant recipients with a high rate of lower respiratory disease. Seasonal influenza vaccination is an important public health measure recommended for transplant recipients and their close contacts. Vaccine has been shown to be safe and generally well tolerated in both adult and pediatric transplant recipients. However, responses to vaccine are variable and are dependent on various factors including time from transplantation and specific immunosuppressive medication. Seasonal influenza vaccine has demonstrated safety and no conclusive evidence exists for a link between vaccination and allograft dysfunction. Annually updated trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines have been available and routinely used for several decades, although newer influenza vaccination formulations including high-dose vaccine, adjuvanted vaccine, quadrivalent inactivated vaccine and vaccine by intradermal delivery system are now available or will be available in the near future. Safety and immunogenicity data of these new formulations in transplant recipients requires investigation. In this document, we review the current state of knowledge on influenza vaccines in transplant recipients and make recommendations on the use of vaccine in both adult and pediatric organ transplant recipients.     

Influenza Vaccination Is Efficacious and Safe in Renal Transplant Recipients

Whether influenza vaccination in solid-organ transplant recipients is efficacious remains a controversial issue. Furthermore, theoretical concerns have been raised regarding the safety of vaccination as it might trigger rejection of the allograft. The present prospective trial is aimed at investigating the antibody response and safety of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients (RTR).
A total of 165 RTR and 41 healthy volunteers were vaccinated with a standard trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies were quantified before and 1 month after vaccination. Seroprotection (SP) and seroresponse (SR) were defined as a titer ≥40 and a 4-fold rise in HI titer, respectively. Similar SR rates were observed in both groups. Postvaccination SP rates in RTR amounted to 92.7%, 78.7% and 82.9% for A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B, respectively. High baseline SP rates, most probably reflecting frequent preimmunizations, explain partly the high postvaccination SP rates. SR rate was independently and inversely associated with baseline SP rate. Mycophenolate mofetil ( MMF ) usage was associated with a 2.6–5-fold lower SR. Nonetheless, these patients showed good postvaccination SP rates. A booster dose did not enhance SP or SR rates. Influenza vaccination neither affected allograft function nor caused rejection episodes. In conclusion, influenza vaccination is efficacious and safe in renal transplantation.     

Humoral Response to the Third Dose of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundMost solid organ transplant recipients did not develop an appreciable serologic response after 2 doses of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.MethodsWe analyzed the humoral response after a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in 130 kidney transplant recipients, compared to 48 health care workers, and associated factors, including prevaccine cellular immune response, by evaluating intracellular cytokine production after stimulation of donor's peripheral blood mononuclear cells.ResultsAfter 2 doses, most of the controls (47 out of 48, 98%) and only 40% of kidney recipients (52 of 130) kidney recipients were seropositive (P < .001). Most seronegative recipients developed a serologic response after the booster (47 out 78, 60%), thus bringing the total number of seropositive recipients to 99 out of 130 (76%). After the third dose, there was a significant increase in antibodies titers in both groups. Decreased humoral response was significantly associated with an older age, lower lymphocyte count, and a lower level of antibodies before booster administration. CD4⁺TNFα⁺ and CD4⁺INFγ⁺ were correlated with mean increase in antibody titers.ConclusionsA third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in kidney recipients is safe and effectively results in increased IgG anti-S levels, including in individuals who were seronegative after 2 doses. Long-term studies of the length of the immune response and protection are required.     

Influenza vaccine antibody responses in lung transplant recipients

CONTEXT: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza infection because of altered lung physiology and immunosuppression. Annual influenza immunization is recommended, but the ability to mount an antibody response may be limited by immunosuppressant medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the antibody response rate to influenza vaccine in lung transplant recipients to healthy controls. DESIGN: Open label study. SETTING: Lung transplant clinic and General Clinical Research Center at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty-eight single and bilateral lung transplant recipients and 35 healthy controls were enrolled in October and November 2002. METHODS: Each individual underwent blood sampling before receiving the 2002-2003 influenza vaccine and 4 weeks later. Influenza antibody concentrations were measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Vaccine response rates (antibody concentration >40 hemagglutination units and at least 4-fold increase in antibody concentration) were compared using chi2. The influence of specific immunosuppressants on vaccine response was compared. RESULTS: The influenza vaccine response rate for lung transplant recipients was 29/68 (43%) and 22/35 (63%) for the healthy individuals (P < .05; chi2). Among the recipients, mycophenolate mofetil was associated with poorer influenza vaccine antibody response (> 40 hemagglutination units) (62% vs 91%; P = .01), whereas sirolimus (91% vs 63%; P = .02) was associated with better influenza antibody response compared to those not taking mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lung transplant recipients had lower influenza vaccine response rates than healthy individuals. Influenza vaccine antibody response is influenced by concomitant administration of mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Future studies should measure protection from influenza infection conferred by immunization and alternative vaccination strategies.     

Comparison of Humoral Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Donors and Healthy Volunteers Following Second Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine

PurposeTo investigate the kinetics and durability of anti-spike glycoprotein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) after the second dose of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients (recipients) compared with those in kidney donors (donors) and healthy volunteers (HVs) and identify factors negatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in recipients.MethodsWe enrolled 378 recipients with no history of COVID-19 and no anti-S-IgG before the first vaccine and who received a second mRNA-based vaccine dose. Antibodies were detected using an immunoassay more than 4 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Anti-S-IgG <0.8, ≥0.8 to 15, and ≥15 U/mL were considered negative, weak positive, and strongly positive, respectively, whereas anti–nucleocapsid protein IgG was negative. Anti-S-IgG titer was determined in 990 HVs and 102 donors.ResultsAnti-S-IgG titers were 154, 2475, and 1181 U/mL in the recipient, HV, and donor groups, respectively, with values significantly lower in recipients. The anti-S-IgG-positivity rate of recipients gradually increased following the second vaccination, suggesting that recipients had a delayed response compared with the HV and donor groups, who had a 100% positivity rate at an earlier time point. Anti-S-IgG titers decreased in donors and HVs, whereas they remained stable in recipients, although at a significantly lower level. Independent negative factors associated with anti-S-IgG titers in recipients were age >60 years and lymphocytopenia (odds ratio: 2.35 and 2.44, respectively).ConclusionsKidney transplant recipients demonstrate delayed and attenuated responses, with lower SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers after the second dose of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.     

The comparison of antibody response to influenza vaccination in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis,hemodialysis and renal transplantation patients

BACKGROUND: The immune system in renal transplant (Tx), Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients have been suppressed and antibody response to vaccination is weaker than that of the normal population. Additionally immune response to vaccination also differs from each other in aforementioned three groups resulting from different levels immunosuppression. In the present study, detection of antibody response to influenza vaccine as an indicator of the level of immunity in Tx, CAPD and HD patients was aimed PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (17 Tx, 16 CAPD and 15 HD) and 10 healthy adults, as a control group were enrolled into the study. Purified, split-virus, commercial trivalent influenza vaccine (VAXIGRIP--Pasteur Merieux Connaught, single dose of 0.5 ml into the deltoid muscle) containing 15 microg of each hemagglutinin of A/Johannesburg/82/96 (H1N1), A/Nachang/933/95 (H3N2) and B/Harbin/07/94 (B) strains were administered to all subjects. Serum samples were collected before and 1 month after vaccination to determine antibody titers. Hemagglutination-inhibition test (HI) was applied for determination of antibody response. The antibody response against each strain was measured separately. In addition to measurement of antibody response, increments in antibody titer (n-fold increase in titer), proportion of patients with protective antibody levels and seroconversion levels were taken into account. Wilcoxon paired 2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was accepted as significance level. RESULTS: Significant increases in antibody titers for all three antigens were observed in the study groups after vaccination (p = 0.001). However, the increase in titer of H3N2 was lower in Tx, CAPD and HD patients than that of the control group (1.0-2.0 vs 5.00) (p = 0.01). The proportion of protective antibody titers and seroconvertions were increased after vaccination in all subjects. Proportions of patients with protective antibody titers after vaccination were lower in Tx, CAPD and HD groups in comparison to control group. CONCLUSION: Although antibody titers in Tx, CAPD and HD patients presented significant increases after vaccination, the proportions of patients with protective antibody titers were lower in comparison to control group. Tx, CAPD and HD patients should be vaccinated every year to be able avoid potential morbidity and mortality of the influenza infection. Trial of high dose vaccination protocols may be useful to increase the proportion of patients with protective antibody levels.     

The antibody response to pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine in adult organ transplant patients

Limited data are available regarding antibody response and the safety of the monovalent influenza A H1N1/09 vaccine for immunocompromised patients. In this study, the humoral response to this vaccine in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and healthy individuals was evaluated. Eighty‐two SOT recipients and 28 healthy individuals received two doses of the influenza A H1N1/09 AS03 adjuvanted vaccine containing 3.75 mg of haemagglutinin at a 3‐ to 4‐week interval. Serum samples were drawn at baseline and 3–4 weeks after the first and second vaccine doses. Seroprotective titres were measured with a haemagglutination inhibition. After the first dose seroprotective titres were observed in 69% of the SOT patients and in 96% of the healthy controls (P = 0.006), and increased after the second dose to 80% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.003). All controls and 77% of the SOT recipients achieved a ≥4‐fold titre rise after the first immunisation (P = 0.005). The vaccine was well tolerated and no acute rejection was observed. Influenza A H1N1/09 vaccine elicited a protective antibody response in the majority of SOT recipients, but the response was lower when compared with controls. A second dose significantly improved vaccine immunogenicity in SOT recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01254955)     

Safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients

This Practice Point commentary discusses Scharpé et al.'s single-center, nonrandomized, prospective trial of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients. In total, 165 transplant recipients and 41 healthy volunteers were vaccinated with a standard inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (containing strains of the A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B viruses). No rejection episodes or other adverse events were reported in either group. Influenza-specific antibody titers increased in renal transplant recipients following vaccination, as measured by comparison of pre-vaccination and post-vaccination seroprotection and seroresponse rates. This commentary discusses the limitations of the trial, and urges caution in extending the conclusions drawn by Scharpé et al. regarding the safety of the trivalent, non-adjuvant-containing influenza vaccine to newer adjuvant-assisted vaccines. Annual vaccination for influenza by use of the trivalent vaccine strategy without adjuvant should, however, be standard of care for all stable renal transplant recipients who do not have clinical contraindications.     

Therapy With m‐TOR Inhibitors Decreases the Response to the Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Concern has been raised regarding the response to vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) undergoing immunosuppressant regimens and the possibility of rejection related to the immune response associated with pandemic influenza H1N1–2009 vaccination. The goal of this study was to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of the pandemic vaccine in SOTR. We performed a multicenter prospective study in SOTR receiving the pandemic vaccine. Immunological response was determined in serum 5 weeks after vaccination by microneutralization assays, and immunoglobulins were measured by ELISA. Three hundred and forty‐six SOTR were included. Preexisting seroprotection was detected in 13.6% of cases and rates of seroconversion and seroprotection after vaccination were 73.1% and 82.9%, respectively. Patients with baseline antibody titers had better geometric mean titers (GMT)‐post after pandemic vaccination (339.4 vs. 121.4, p < 0.001). Younger age, liver disease and m‐TOR inhibitor therapy were independently associated with lower seroprotection and GMT‐post. There were no major adverse effects or rejection episodes. Pandemic vaccine was safe in SOTR and elicited an adequate response, although lower than in healthy individuals. This is the first study describing a decreased response after vaccination in patients receiving mTOR inhibitors who presented lower seroprotection rates and lower GMT‐post.     

Influenza vaccination in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity of the trivalent inactivated influenza split virus vaccine (Infusplit SSW 97/98) containing A/Bayern/07/95 (H1N1)-like (A/Johannesburg/82/96 [NIB-39]), A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2)-like (A/Nanchang/933/95 [Resvir-0]), and B/Beijing/184/93-like (B/Harbin/7/94) hemagglutinin antigens was tested in liver transplant recipients (TXL-R). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Serum antibody titers were determined 21+/-2 days after a single vaccination in 62 adult TXL-R and 59 adult volunteers. RESULTS: Protective postimmunization antibody titers for the three antigens were similar in TXL-R (protection rates 92%, 92%, and 95%) and the comparison group (97%, 100%, and 100%). Adverse reactions were mild and less frequent in TXL-R. A significant decrease of CD8+CD38+ lymphocytes after vaccination was found in TXL-R. No association between antibody response and age, gender, time interval since transplantation, anti-hepatitis B surface antigen immunoprophylaxis, or immunosuppressive medication was detected. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the vaccine is safe and effective and should be recommended to TXL-R.     

Cell-mediated immune response to influenza vaccination in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients are susceptible to complications from influenza infection. Antibody responses to influenza vaccination have been shown to be decreased in lung transplant recipients. Cellular immune mechanisms serve an important role in influenza clearance. The cellular immune response to influenza vaccination has not been studied in transplant populations. METHODS: Interleukin-2, interleukin-10, interferon-gamma, and granzyme B levels to the three viral antigens included in the 1999 to 2000 influenza vaccine were measured before and 4 weeks post-vaccination in 43 lung transplant recipients and 21 healthy adult controls. RESULTS: Interleukin-2, interleukin-10, interferon-gamma, and granzyme B levels did not increase from pre- to post-vaccination in the lung transplant group. Both pre- and post-cytokine levels were lower in the transplant group compared to the control group. Pre- and post-granzyme B levels did not differ significantly between the groups. The T-helper response in the control group varied with the different viral strains. A correlation between acute rejection episodes and the absence of both azathioprine and mycophenolate was found. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination does not stimulate a cell-mediated immune response in lung transplant recipients as judged by interleukin-2, interleukin-10, interferon-gamma, and granzyme B levels. Alternative prevention strategies may be needed.