Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: This trial was conducted to compare cycle control with vaginal ring a combined contraceptive vaginal ring, and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) delivering 30 mug ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 mug levonorgestrel. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, multi-centre, Phase III study involved adult women from 11 countries. Subjects were treated with either vaginal ring or a COC for 13 cycles (12 months). RESULTS: A total of 1030 subjects (vaginal ring, n=512; COC, n=518) comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for vaginal ring and 71.2% for the COC group. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding and spotting over cycles 2-13, the primary efficacy parameter, was lower with vaginal ring (range 2.0-6.4%) than the COC (range 3.5-12.6%), and for cycles 2 and 9 the lower incidence with vaginal ring was confirmed as statistically significant (P=0.003 and P=0.002 respectively). The incidence of intended bleeding was significantly higher over all cycles with vaginal ring (58.8-72.8%) than with the COC (43.4-57.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Cycle control with vaginal ring was excellent and superior to that of a COC containing 30 mug EE.     

The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral density in healthy pre-menopausal women

BACKGROUND: Hormonal contraceptives have been associated with various effects on the bone mineral density (BMD) of pre-menopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a vaginal contraceptive ring on BMD in pre-menopausal women and compare them with those of non-hormonal contraceptive use. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre study used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure BMD in the lumbar spine (L(2)-L(4)) and femoral neck regions. Subjects were assigned 3:1 to receive a contraceptive ring (n = 105) or a non-hormonal contraceptive control (n = 39) and were assessed after 13 and 26 cycles of contraceptive ring treatment or 12 and 24 months of control treatment. RESULTS: No change from baseline in BMD (Z-scores) was seen in contraceptive ring users (n = 73) at either time-point. In the control group (n = 30), BMD increased slightly from baseline resulting in significant differences (P < 0.0001) between the two groups at cycle 26/month 24. These differences are not clinically relevant, although some degree of acquisition of peak bone mass might have been prevented in the contraceptive ring group. The contraceptive ring was generally well tolerated; a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events was observed in the contraceptive ring group compared with the non-hormonal contraceptive control group. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy pre-menopausal women, 2 years of contraceptive ring use produced no changes in BMD.     

Feasibility of administering mifepristone as a once a month contraceptive pill

Many women find the idea of a once-a-month contraceptive pill an attractive concept. Mifepristone has been shown to be effective as a contraceptive if administered in the early luteal phase. We tested the contraceptive efficacy of 200 mg of mifepristone on day luteinizing hormone (LH) + 2 in a group of 32 women who used a fertility monitor to identify the LH surge. We also recruited a control group, comprising 20 women who were trying to conceive. In this group, 12 women conceived during a total of 50 control cycles (probability of pregnancy 0.25-0.32). Women in the treatment group contributed to a total of 178 cycles and there were two pregnancies (probability of pregnancy 0.01). An LH surge was not detected in 34 cycles (19.1%). In 20 cycles (11.2%) this was due to imperfect use while 14 were monitor method failures (7.9%). Treatment with mifepristone in the early luteal phase did not disrupt the cycle length but women reported slight vaginal bleeding in 15% of the cycles. The combination of a home-use fertility monitor with once-a-month administration of mifepristone (especially if mifepristone is administered at the early luteal phase) is an acceptable contraceptive option with minimal side effects. Unfortunately, it is difficult to envisage how an easier way of defining the correct timing, which required less compliance, could be devised.     

Ovarian function with a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring

BACKGROUND: NuvaRing is a combined contraceptive vaginal ring designed for 3 weeks continuous use followed by a 1 week ring-free period. The present study evaluated ovarian function in women who were instructed to either adhere to, or deviate from, the recommended regimen of use. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized study, 45 women aged between 18 and 35 years used NuvaRing for one cycle in which the ring was used according to the recommended regimen. Women in group A (n = 15) then continued with a 'normal' 3 week period of ring use after which the restoration of ovarian function-i.e. the time to ovulation-for each woman was determined by daily vaginal ultrasound and serum hormone levels. For women in group B (n = 15), the second cycle consisted of only 3 consecutive days of ring use, after which each woman was monitored until ovulation. Women in group C (n = 15) were not permitted to start a second 'normal' cycle until a follicle with a diameter of 13 mm was observed by vaginal ultrasound; subsequently, the development of these follicles during the second cycle of ring use was monitored daily. RESULTS: Irrespective of the length of the second cycle, 3 weeks (group A) versus 3 days (group B), a new cohort of follicles needed to be recruited and the time to ovulation after ring removal was similar (19 versus 17 days). The median time needed to develop a follicle up to 13 mm in diameter (group C) was 11 days (range 8-21 days); none of the women ovulated after insertion of the second ring. CONCLUSION: NuvaRing is a highly effective, reversible method of hormonal contraception. Ovulation, at least until the stage of a 13 mm dominant follicle, is prevented and as little as 3 consecutive days of NuvaRing use interferes with follicle growth.     

Effects on cycle control and bodyweight of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, versus an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare cycle control, cycle-related characteristics and bodyweight effects of NuvaRing with those of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg of drospirenone. METHODS: A randomized, multicentre, open-label trial in which 983 women were treated (intent-to-treat population) with NuvaRing or the COC for 13 cycles. RESULTS: Breakthrough bleeding or spotting during cycles 2-13 was in general less frequent with NuvaRing than that with the COC (4.7-10.4%) and showed a statistically significant odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.46, 0.80) with longitudinal analysis. Intended bleeding was significantly better for all cycles with NuvaRing (55.2-68.5%) than that with the COC (35.6-56.6%) (P < 0.01). Changes from baseline in mean bodyweight and body composition parameters were relatively small for both groups with no notable between-group differences. CONCLUSION: NuvaRing was associated with better cycle control than the COC, and there was no clinically relevant difference between the two groups in bodyweight.     

Effects of two types of hormonal contraception--oral versus intravaginal--on the sexual life of women and their partners

BACKGROUND: Data relating to the influence of hormonal contraception on sexual life are conflicting and mostly they refer to oral contraceptives. In this randomized, controlled, prospective study we compared the effect of an intravaginal hormonal contraceptive with the effect of a combined oral contraceptive on sexual function. METHODS: Fifty-one healthy women with a permanent partner and an active sexual life were randomly divided in two groups according to a computer-generated randomization list: 26 women (group A) used an intravaginal contraceptive releasing 120 microg/day of etonogestrel and 15 microg/day of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 25 women (group B) used an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg di EE and 150 microg of desogestrel. Twenty-five women participated in the study as control group (group C). A specific questionnaire was completed by the patients and their partners at the start of the study and after cycles 3 and 6 of contraceptive use. RESULTS: Within 3 months of contraceptive use, women from both groups A and B reported a global improvement in sexual function. A statistically significant increase in sexual fantasy was reported only by patients of group A. Whereas partners of the women in both groups A and B reported an improvement in sexual function after 3 months of contraceptive intake, only patients' partners of group A reported a significant increase in sexual interest, complicity and sexual fantasy. CONCLUSIONS: Both hormonal contraceptives tested were seen to have a positive effect on some aspects of sexual function. The intravaginal contraceptive ring seems to exert a further positive effect on the psychological aspect of both women and their partners, which is evident from an improved complicity and sexual satisfaction.     

Early luteal phase treatment with mifepristone (RU 486) for fertility regulation

Mifepristone (RU 486) is an antiprogestin which interacts withprogesterone at the receptor level. Administration of mifepristoneimmediately after ovulation does not upset the menstrual cycle.However, the maturation and function of the endometrium is inhibitedand uterine contractility is changed. To test if these effectsare sufficient to prevent implantation, 21 women agreed to useone single treatment with 200 mg mifepristone on day luteinizinghormone (LH) + 2 monthly as their only contraceptive method.The women were treated for 1– 12 months. The time of theLH peak was determined in the urine by the women themselvesusing a rapid LH test (Ovu-quick, Organon). The overall numberof cycles studied was 169. In 12 cycles the women were unableto detect the LH peak. In these cycles no treatment was givenand the women advised to use barrier methods during the timeto menstruation. The remaining 157 cycles with a detectableLH peak were all ovulatory based on plasma progesterone measurement.One pregnancy occurred. On the basis of the time of the LH peak,it was retrospectively calculated that in 124 cycles at leastone act of intercourse occurred during the period 3 days beforeto 1 day after ovulation. The probability of pregnancy in thisperiod of the menstrual cycle is thus 0.008. The women did notcomplain of any treatment-related side-effects apart from slightbleeding for 2–3 days starting a few days after the dayof treatment in 35% of the cycles. The results show that theeffect of mifepristone on the endometrium is sufficent to preventpregnancy and indicate that treatment with antiprogestin canalso be used for contraceptive purposes.     

Ovarian function with the contraceptive vaginal ring or an oral contraceptive: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: The effects on ovarian function of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) were compared. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was performed in 40 healthy female volunteers, who were randomized by a computer-generated list after stratification for the ovulation day in a pretreatment cycle. They received two cycles of NuvaRing (21 subjects) or a COC (30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel, 19 subjects). NuvaRing was started on cycle day 5, COC on cycle day 1. Follicular diameter, endometrial thickness and FSH, LH, 17beta-estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were determined. RESULTS: The median maximum follicular diameter (maxFD) was < or =11 mm during treatment. In the first treatment cycle the maxFD was lower in the COC than in the NuvaRing group, due to the different starting procedures. MaxFD were not different in the second treatment cycle. In both groups, E2 and progesterone levels remained low during treatment. Ovulations did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, ovarian activity was adequately suppressed. Due to the different starting procedures, lower ovarian activity was observed in the COC group in the first treatment cycle. In the second cycle, ovarian suppression was comparable with NuvaRing and COC treatment.     

Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception: a Cochrane review

BACKGROUND: Side-effects caused by oral contraceptives discourage compliance with and continuation of oral contraceptives. Three approaches have been used to decrease these adverse effects: reduction of steroid dose, development of new steroids, and new formulas and schedules of administration. The third strategy led to the biphasic oral contraceptive pill. We compared biphasic oral contraceptives with monophasic oral contraceptives in terms of efficacy, cycle control and discontinuation due to side-effects. Our a priori hypotheses were: (i) biphasic oral contraceptives are less effective in preventing pregnancy than monophasic oral contraceptives, and (ii) biphasic oral contraceptives cause more side-effects, give poorer cycle control and have lower continuation rates. METHODS: We searched computerized databases Medline, Embase, Popline and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register. Additionally, we searched the reference lists of all potentially relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted the authors of relevant studies and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the USA. We included randomized controlled trials comparing any biphasic oral contraceptive with any monophasic oral contraceptive when used to prevent pregnancy. We examined the studies found during the various literature searches for possible inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using the Cochrane guidelines. We contacted the authors of all included studies and of possibly randomized studies for supplementary information about the study methods and outcomes. We entered the data in RevMan 3.1, imported the data into RevMan 4.1, and calculated Peto odds ratios for the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding, absence of withdrawal bleeding and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding. RESULTS: Only one trial of limited quality compared a biphasic and monophasic preparation. This trial examined 533 user cycles of a biphasic pill (norethindrone 500 microg/ethinyl estradiol 35 microg for 10 days, followed by norethindrone 1000 microg/ethinyl estradiol 35 microg for 11 days) and 481 user cycles of a monophasic contraceptive pill (norethindrone acetate 1500 microg/ethinyl estradiol 30 microg daily). The study found no significant differences in intermenstrual bleeding, amenorrhoea and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding between the biphasic and monophasic oral contraceptive pills. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions are limited by the identification of only one trial, the methodological shortcomings of that trial and the absence of data on accidental pregnancies. However, the trial found no important differences in bleeding patterns between the biphasic and monophasic preparations studied. Since no clear rationale exists for biphasic pills and since extensive evidence is available for monophasic pills, the latter are preferred.     

Improving cycle control in progestogen-only contraceptive pill users by intermittent treatment with a new anti-progestogen

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the anti-progestogen Org 31710 in improving cycle control in healthy women using the desogestrel progestogen-only pill was investigated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: A total of 103 women using the 75 micro g desogestrel progestogen-only pill daily also received either 150 mg Org 31710 or placebo once every 28 days, starting on day 1, for a duration of 4-7 treatment cycles. RESULTS: The percentage of women with bleeding or spotting (B/S) every day in the placebo group was on average 30% during the whole treatment period and no days without reported B/S occurred. In contrast, a cyclic pattern was observed for the Org 31710 group; a peak incidence of B/S was observed on day 3 or 4 of each cycle, followed by a sharp decrease on cycle days 9-15. Compared with controls, less subjects in the Org 31710 group reported irregular, frequent or prolonged bleeding. These differences were clearly observed in the initial cycles, but were somewhat less pronounced during the later cycles of the treatment period. A relatively high incidence of B/S episodes starting in the second section of the cycle was also observed. CONCLUSION: The addition of Org 31710 once a month improved cycle control in women using daily treatment with 75 micro g desogestrel.     

A prospective study evidencing rhinomanometric and olfactometric outcomes in women taking oral contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the changes in olfactory sensitivity of oral contraceptive (pill) users. METHODS: Sixty women underwent rhinomanometric and olfactometric determinations during the follicular, periovular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle, and at day 7, 14 and 21 of contraceptive intake. Thirty-one women used 30 microg ethinyl oestradiol plus 75 microg gestodene and 29 women used 20 microg ethinyl oestradiol plus 150 microg desogestrel. RESULTS: Rhinomanometry showed higher but not statistically significant values during the periovular phase than in the follicular and luteal phases. Olfactometry showed a higher sensitivity during the follicular and periovular phases than during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The rhinomanometric surveys in pill users were statistically different from those of the luteal phase (P < 0.02) and the follicular and periovular phases (P < 0.001). The olfactometric thresholds during the period of contraceptive use were statistically different from those of the follicular phase for a few odorous substances, and from those of the periovular phase for each odorous substance, but similar to those of the luteal phase (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the rhinomanometric airflow and trans-nasal pressure, the olfactory threshold to odours seems to depend on the variations of the ovarian steroids during the menstrual cycle and on the iatrogenic effects of oral contraceptives.     

The effect of transdermal and vaginal estrogen therapy on markers of postmenopausal estrogen status

OBJECTIVE: To compare serum 17beta-estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estrone sulfate, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, sex hormone-binding globulin, vaginal pH, and the vaginal maturation indices in women using a low-dose transdermal patch releasing 14 microg of E2 per day and a vaginal ring releasing 7.5 microg of E2 per day. DESIGN: Twenty-four postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to either the patch (n = 12) or the ring (n = 12) for a 12-week study period. Serum E2, E1, estrone sulfate, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured by immunoassay at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. Vaginal pH was determined at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. Vaginal cytologic examinations for vaginal maturation index were done at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty women completed the study. The patch significantly increased serum E1 and E2 levels at 6 and 12 weeks (P < 0.01); there was no significant increase in serum E1 and E2 levels with the ring. Both the patch and the ring significantly reduced vaginal pH at 6 (P < 0.001) and 12 (P < 0.001) weeks and significantly reduced the percentage of vaginal parabasal cells at 12 weeks with no significant difference between the two groups. Both preparations increased the proportion of superficial cells; the increase was significant only with the patch (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A transdermal E2 skin patch releasing 14 microg of E2 per day had an effect on vaginal pH and vaginal maturation indices similar to that of a vaginal E2 ring releasing 7.5 microg of E2 per day. Therefore, this patch is likely to relieve symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy.     

A novel estrogen-free oral contraceptive pill for women: multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of mifepristone and progestogen-only pill (levonorgestrel)

BACKGROUND: The acceptability and continuation rate of oral contraceptive steroids are limited by unpredictable bleeding and the fear of long-term risks such as breast cancer. By inhibiting ovulation and by altering the receptivity of the endometrium, antagonists of progesterone, such as mifepristone, could be developed as estrogen-free novel contraceptives. METHODS: Multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing frequency of amenorrhoea (primary outcome), bleeding patterns, side effects and efficacy in women taking daily 5 mg mifepristone (n = 73) or 0.03 mg levonorgestrel (progestogen-only pill; POP, n = 23) for 24 weeks. RESULTS: More women were amenorrhoeic while taking mifepristone than POP (49 versus 0% P < 0.001), and fewer women bled or spotted for >5 days per month (4 versus 39% P < 0.001). Forty-eight percent of women who took mifepristone for 6 months had cystic glandular dilatation of the endometrium but none showed hyperplasia or atypia. There were no pregnancies in 356 months of exposure in women who used only mifepristone for contraception. Two pregnancies occurred in women taking mifepristone who were also using condoms for dual protection. CONCLUSIONS: Daily mifepristone (5 mg) is an effective oral contraceptive pill which has a better pattern of menstrual bleeding than an existing POP (levonorgestrel).     

Bleeding patterns after vaginal misoprostol for treatment of early pregnancy failure

BACKGROUND: Dilatation and curettage (D&C) has been the usual treatment for early pregnancy failure (EPF). Medical management with misoprostol may be an effective alternative. Bleeding patterns during and after medical management of EPF are unknown. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at University-based clinics and physician offices. Eighty women <11 weeks estimated gestational age with a diagnosis of missed abortion or fetal demise were enrolled. Treatment consisted of either 800 micro g of moistened (2 ml of saline) or dry vaginal misoprostol. Self-reported bleeding and sanitary product usage were recorded in a daily 2 week diary. Haemoglobin was assessed at enrollment and 2 weeks later. RESULTS: After misoprostol treatment, patients reported bleeding or spotting every day for the 14 days observed. Self-assessed heavy bleeding days were few (median 3) and usually occurred immediately after treatment. Sanitary pad use was highly variable (mean 30.5, range 2-125 pads over the 2 week period) and not related to changes in haemoglobin. The mean decrease in haemoglobin was 0.5 g/dl (SD 1.2). Complete expulsion without D&C occurred in 85% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding for at least 2 weeks after vaginal misoprostol for EPF is common. Heavy bleeding is usually limited to a few days after treatment. Clinically important changes in haemoglobin are rare.     

A prospective randomized control trial comparing medical and surgical treatment for early pregnancy failure

A prospective randomized control trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of single dose, 800 microg misoprostol administered p.v. compared with surgical evacuation for the treatment of early pregnancy failure. A total of 80 women with a diagnosis of early pregnancy failure were randomized to study (vaginal misoprostol) and control (surgical curettage) groups. Success of treatment, side-effects as assessed during, immediately after and 10 days after treatment, and patient satisfaction were compared. Intravaginal misoprostol was successful in 82.5% (33 out of 40) of the patients. None of the control group patients required a repeat evacuation. The number of patients who experienced significant abdominal pain following treatment did not differ between the groups. The duration of pain was shorter in the control group; however, they required more analgesics during this short period. The number of patients with significant vaginal bleeding, the duration or severity of bleeding did not show any significant difference between the groups. All 33 patients in the study group who had successful treatment expressed satisfaction, whereas only 58% of the control group did so. In conclusion this randomized control study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the administration of 800 microg of misoprostol p.v. for the management of early pregnancy failure.     

Does an acidic medium enhance the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming?

Absorption pharmacokinetics reveal a relationship between plasma concentrations of misoprostol and its therapeutic effect. To achieve a constant plasma profile and optimal efficacy, it is important to develop a medium that ensures complete dissolution of vaginal misoprostol tablets. Vaginal misoprostol is said to liquefy better in an acidic medium; thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether a 200 microg misoprostol tablet dissolved in acetic acid would be more efficacious than 200 microg misoprostol dissolved in water for pre-abortion cervical priming. A total of 120 healthy nulliparous women requesting legal termination of pregnancy between 6-12 weeks gestation were allocated randomly to either of the study groups. Vacuum aspiration was performed 3-4 h after insertion of the misoprostol tablet. Using Hegar's dilator, the degree of cervical dilatation before operation was measured. Of 60 women, 14 (23%) achieved a cervical dilatation of >/=8 mm when the misoprostol dose was dissolved in acetic acid; 12 (20%) achieved a similar cervical dilatation when the dose was dissolved in water. The mean cervical dilatation for the acid and water media used was 6.3 mm and 6.2 mm respectively; these differences were not statistically significant, neither were pre-operative and intra-operative blood losses statistically different between the two groups. Twenty-four (40%) and four (7%) respectively of women in whom a water medium was used experienced vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain; 20 (33%) and 0 women respectively among those in whom an acetic acid medium was used experienced vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. These differences in side effects were not statistically significant. Our study shows that the use of acetic acid to dissolve vaginal misoprostol does not improve the efficacy in achieving successful cervical dilatation for pre-abortion cervical priming.     

Endometrial effects of transdermal estradiol/norethisterone acetate.

The efficacy of transdermal norethisterone acetate in sequence with transdermal estradiol has been investigated in a multicenter study of 136 post-menopausal women to determine the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia, the effects on the vaginal cytology and the control of bleeding. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of 4 weeks each (2 weeks estradiol 50 micrograms/day followed by 2 weeks of a new combined patch delivering norethisterone acetate 0.25 mg/day and estradiol 50 micrograms/day). Endometrial histology was assessed by two pathologists. Of the 136 pre-treatment biopsies 89% provided no material, an inadequate sample or an inactive (atrophic or non-secretory) endometrium. Of the post-treatment biopsies from 110 women who completed the study: 65% showed secretory, 3% proliferative and 24% inadequate material or inactive endometrium. Hyperplasia was found in two biopsies (2%); in one of these focal atypical hyperplasia was agreed by both pathologists, in another a hyperplastic endometrial polyp was diagnosed by one pathologist. The bleeding was regular in 80% of the 1195 cycles and irregular in 11%. No bleeding occurred in 9% of the cycles. Vaginal cytology showed a significant shift towards increased maturation during treatment.     

A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation

BACKGROUND: Several studies have now reported the successful use of the sublingual administration of misoprostol for medical abortion in the first trimester. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability to women, the efficacy of the regimen, as well as the acceptability to staff of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol following mifepristone for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation. METHODS: Women were randomized by opening consecutive sealed envelopes generated using random number tables. Mifepristone (200 mg) was followed 36-48 h later by sublingual administration of misoprostol 600 microg or vaginal misoprostol 800 microg. This was followed by 3 hourly doses of misoprostol 400 microg administered sublingually or vaginally. RESULTS: A total of 76 women were randomized. Of women in the sublingual group, 24 (66.7%) expressed satisfaction with the route of misoprostol administration compared with 25 (62.5%) in the vaginal group. A higher proportion in the sublingual group used intramuscular opiates. There was no significant difference in the surgical evacuation rate between the sublingual (three out of 36 women, 8.3%) and vaginal groups (one out of 40, 2.5%), (P=0.26) and acceptability to staff was the same for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual administration of misoprostol following mifepristone is an acceptable and effective alternative to vaginal administration for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation. However, women should be advised about the greater likelihood of requiring stronger analgesia.     

The effect of contraceptive pills on the measured blood loss in medical termination of pregnancy by mifepristone and misoprostol: a randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized placebo controlled trial was performed to assess the immediate use of oral contraceptive (OC) on the amount of blood loss in the post-abortion period in women undergoing medical abortion by mifepristone and misoprostol. METHODS: One hundred women were randomized by computer to receive either OC pills or placebo, immediately after medical abortion. RESULTS: There was no difference in the complete abortion rate between the two groups. The complete abortion rate was 98 and 92% in the OC and placebo groups respectively. The side-effects and duration of bleeding were also similar. The median days of vaginal bleeding were 17 (range: 3-41) and 15 (range: 5-48) in the OC and placebo groups respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean haemoglobin level on day 15 in the OC group (from 12.0 to 11.5 g/dl) whereas the mean haemoglobin level in the placebo group remained stable. The median measured blood loss was 69.9 ml in the OC group and 72.8 ml in the placebo group and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that it is safe to offer women combined OC pills immediately after medical abortion as an option of contraception, as it does not affect the duration or amount of vaginal bleeding or the complete abortion rate.     

The measurement of endometrial perfusion in norplant users: a pilot study

The use of progestogens without oestrogen is commonly associated with irregular menstrual bleeding. Oestrogens and progestogens are both thought to influence endometrial perfusion; changes in endometrial perfusion may contribute to vascular fragility and breakdown. In this study, endometrial perfusion was measured using laser-Doppler fluxmetry in women in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle before and 4-6 weeks after insertion of the low-dose long-acting levonorgestrel contraceptive implant system, Norplant. Endometrial perfusion was also measured in women exposed to Norplant for up to 19 months. There was no significant difference between endometrial perfusion in control cycles (27.2 flux units +/- 5.5, SEM) and at 4-6 weeks after Norplant insertion (16.3 flux units +/- 5.0), a time when irregular bleeding and spotting are common. Endometrial perfusion was no different from controls after longer periods of Norplant exposure (35.7 flux units +/- 7.2). No direct relationships between endometrial perfusion and plasma concentrations of ovarian steroid hormones were demonstrated. Short-term endometrial vasomotion was largely abolished during Norplant exposure.