FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastases from malignant primary bone tumours: comparison with bone scintigraphy

The purpose of this study was to compare positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy in the detection of osseous metastases from malignant primary osseous tumours. In 70 patients with histologically proven malignant primary bone tumours (32 osteosarcomas, 38 Ewing's sarcomas), 118 FDG-PET examinations were evaluated. FDG-PET scans were analysed with regard to osseous metastases in comparison with bone scintigraphy. The reference methods for both imaging modalities were histopathological analysis, morphological imaging [additional conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] and/or clinical follow-up over 6-64 months (median 20 months). In 21 examinations (18%) reference methods revealed 54 osseous metastases (49 from Ewing's sarcomas, five from osteosarcomas). FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 0.90, a specificity of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.95 on an examination-based analysis. Comparable values for bone scintigraphy were 0.71, 0.92 and 0.88. On a lesion-based analysis the sensitivity of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy was 0.80 and 0.72, respectively. Analysing only Ewing's sarcoma patients, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET and bone scan were 1.00, 0.96 and 0.97 and 0.68, 0.87 and 0.82, respectively (examination-based analysis). None of the five osseous metastases from osteosarcoma were detected by FDG-PET, but all of them were true-positive using bone scintigraphy. In conclusion, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET in the detection of osseous metastases from Ewing's sarcomas are superior to those of bone scintigraphy. However, in the detection of osseous metastases from osteosarcoma, FDG-PET seems to be less sensitive than bone scintigraphy.     

全身MRI与核素骨扫描对骨转移瘤诊断价值的对照研究

目的 评价全身MRI对骨转移瘤的诊断价值.方法 对30例经病理证实的恶性肿瘤患者在2周内分别进行伞身MRI及核素骨显像(BS),采取临床资料同常规MRI、CT等多种影像资料结合分析,辅以必要的随访复查为"金标准",分别以30例患者和270个部位为单位进行分析.使用McNemar检验比较两者对骨转移瘤诊断的敏感度、特异度.结果 30例患者中,"金标准"诊断27例患者存在骨转移,全身MRI检出25例,2例假阴性,无假阳性患者;BS检出27例阳性患者,其中2例为假阳性.以病例为单位,两者的敏感度均为92.6%(25/27),特异度分别为100%(3/3)及33.3%(1/3).ROC曲线下面积分别为0.9630及0.6296,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).以病灶部位为单位统计显示全身MRI的敏感度、特异度分别为90.8%(108/119)、98.0%(148/151),高于骨扫描的70.6%(84/119)、90.7%(137/151)(P值均<0.01).全身MRI的ROC曲线下面积为0.9438,大于BS的0.8066(P<0.01).全身MRI同时发现3例患者存在脑转移,4例患者存在肺转移,4例患者存在肝转移.结论 全身MRI对骨转移瘤的综合诊断能力较Bs好,具有一定的临床应用价值.

Abstract：

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of whole-body MRI(WBMRI)in detecting osseous metastases.Methods Thirty patients verified with malignant tumor by histology were enrolled.All the patients underwent WB-MRI and bone scintigraphy(BS)with a two week interval.Clinical information,conventional MRI and CT images,and follow-up data were collected as gold standard for the diagnosis of bone metastases.The data of 30 patients and 270 segments as study unit respectively were analyzed.The sensitivity and specificity between WB-MRI and BS were compared with McNemar test.Resuits Bone metastases were confirmed in 27 of 30 patients by gold standard.Twenty-five patients with bone metastases were detected by WB-MRI and no false-positive cases.Twenty-seven patients with bone metastases were Nund by BS but having two false-positive oases.With patients as study unit,the diagnostic sensitivity of WB-MRI and BS were both 92.6%(25/27)and the specificity were 100%(3/3)and 33.3%(1/3),respectively.The area under ROC curve of WB-MRI and BS were 0.9630 and 0.6296,respectively(P>0.05).With segments as study unit,119 bone metastases segments were confirmed.The diagnostic sensitivity of WB-MRI and BS were 90.8%(108/119)and 70.6%(84/119)(P<0.01),while the specificity were 98.0%(148/151)and 90.7%(137/151),respectively(P<0.01).The area under ROC curve of WB-MRI and BS were 0.9438 and 0.8066.The former was obviously higher than the latter(P<0.01).Meauwhile.by WB-MRI,3 cases coexisting with brain metastases,4 cases with lung metastases,and 4 cases with hepatic metastases were found.Conclusion WB-MRI was a good tool for screening osseous metastases.     

Diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases detection in cancer patients: Comparison between bone scintigraphy and whole-body FDG-PET

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has become widely available and an important oncological technique. To evaluate the influence of PET on detection of bone metastasis, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of PET and conventional bone scintigraphy (BS) in a variety of cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive ninety-five patients with various cancers, who received both PET and BS within one month, were retrospectively analyzed. A whole-body PET (from face to upper thigh) and a standard whole body BS were performed and these images were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians with and without patient information using monitor diagnosis. Each image interpretation was performed according to 8 separate areas (skull, vertebra, upper limbs, sternum and clavicles, scapula, ribs, pelvis, and lower limbs) using a 5-point-scale (0: definitely negative, 1: probably negative, 2: equivocal, 3: probably positive, 4: definitely positive for bone metastasis). RESULTS: Twenty-one of 95 patients (22.1%) with 43 of 760 areas (5.7%) of bone metastases were finally confirmed. In untreated patients, 12 of 14 bone metastasis positive patients were detected by PET, while 9 of 14 were detected by BS. Three cases showed true positive in PET and false negative in BS due to osteolytic type bone metastases. In untreated cases, PET with and without clinical information showed better sensitivity than BS in patient-based diagnosis. For the purpose of treatment effect evaluation, PET showed better results because of its ability in the evaluation of rapid response of tumor cells to chemotherapy. Out of 10 cases of multiple-area metastases, 9 cases included vertebrae. There was only one solitary lesion located outside of FOV of PET scan in the femur, but with clinical information that was no problem for PET diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of bone metastasis was comparable in PET and BS in the present study. In a usual clinical condition, limited FOV (from face to upper thigh) of PET scan may not be a major drawback in the detection of bone metastases because of the relatively low risk of solitary bone metastasis in skull bone and lower limbs.     

Whole-body iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging for detection of bone metastases in patients with paraganglioma: comparison with bone scintigraphy

Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (¹³¹I-MIBG) therapy is an effective treatment for patients with malignant paraganglioma for which surgical resection is not indicated. We performed high-dose ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy on two patients with malignant paraganglioma and multiple bone metastases. The bone metastases were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Metastatic bone lesions were evaluated by whole-body ¹³¹I-MIBG imaging and bone scintigraphy. Whole-body ¹³¹I-MIBG imaging showed extensive metastatic bone lesions, whereas conventional bone scintigraphy did not. There was a remarkable discrepancy between ¹³¹I-MIBG imaging and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of metastatic bone lesions of malignant paraganglioma in our two patients. High-dose ¹³¹I-MIBG imaging may detect early stages of bone metastases, compared with bone scintigraphy, in patients with malignant paraganglioma.     

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for detecting bone metastases: comparison with bone scintigraphy

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in detecting skeletal metastasis and to compare the results with those of bone scintigraphy (BS).

Materials and methods

Thirty-three patients (21 women, 12 men, median age 58 years, range 27–78) were enrolled. Histological proof of malignancy was obtained in all cases. The primary tumour was unknown in 1 patient. BS and WB-MRI were performed as staging procedures in 15 patients, during the follow-up in 6 and to investigate pain in 9 and neurological symptoms in 3. Bone metastases were recorded for 8 different skeletal segments (ribs, skull, cervicothoracic spine, lumbosacral spine, clavicle-scapula-sternum, pelvis, upper extremities and lower extremities) in all patients, for a total of 264 examined areas.

Results

Bone metastases were detected in 18 patients (55%). In 15/33 patients, WB-MRI and BS were concordantly negative. BS revealed focal metastatic uptake in 72%, whereas WB-MRI was positive in 89%. Results differed in seven patients. WB-MRI was positive but BS was negative in five cases. Two patients with negative WB-MRI had focal and intense uptake in the ribs on BS. Out of 264 examined areas, bone metastases were detected in 34 (13%). WB-MRI revealed tumour spread in 26/34 areas (76%) and BS in 21/34 areas only (62%).

Conclusions

WB-MRI is a reliable method for screening patients with suspected skeletal metastases, although BS still remains a useful tool. WB-MRI is also advantageous because it reveals extraskeletal and soft tissue metastases.     

[11C]Choline PET/CT detection of bone metastases in patients with PSA progression after primary treatment for prostate cancer: comparison with bone scintigraphy

Purpose  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of [¹¹C]choline positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in comparison with bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases (BM) of patients with biochemical progression after radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa).     

Bone metastases from unknown primary. FDG-PET detection of two synchronous tumors

A 60-year-old woman presented with noncardiac chest pain over months and negative laboratory findings. Conventional imaging methods and bone scintigraphy detected bone lesions suggesting metastatic disease from an unknown primary tumor. An 18FDG-PET scan performed to orient the search for the primary tumor found focal lesions suggesting lymphoma and identified a focal thyroid lesion and a cervical lymph node accessible for biopsy. The biopsy of this lymph node incidentally detected a papillary differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), since the existence of a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was confirmed after a new biopsy. After confirming the presence of a lymphoma, 18FDG-PET enabled the initial staging of the tumor, the evaluation of the response to treatment, and follow-up for detection of recurrence. On the other hand, 18FDG-PET incidentally detected a DTC.     

Detection of bone marrow metastases by FDG-PET and missed by bone scintigraphy in widespread melanoma

The optimal management of patients with melanoma requires accurate imaging techniques that can screen the entire body for metastases. One of the most used tests for this purpose is bone scintigraphy. PET has been reported to be more sensitive than bone scintigraphy in some malignancies. In our case, FDG-PET was also superior to bone scintigraphy in detecting the extent of skeletal disease in a patient with melanoma. This is likely the result of the fact that metastasis to bone marrow may not result in bone reaction in certain conditions and therefore bone scans may remain negative despite skeletal involvement.     

Detection of unknown primary tumours and distant metastases in patients with cervical metastases: value of FDG-PET versus conventional modalities

In 1%-2% of head and neck oncology patients, the only symptom of a malignancy is a positive cervical node. The aim of this study was to compare the value of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG-PET) and conventional diagnostic modalities (CT and/or MRI, panendoscopy) in detecting unknown primary tumours and distant metastases in patients suffering from such a cervical metastasis. Fifty patients (37 men and 13 women) with cervical metastases of an unknown primary tumour were included. All patients underwent FDG-PET. In addition, CT and/or MRI was obtained and panendoscopy was performed. All clinically known metastases were detected by FDG-PET. The primary tumour could be diagnosed in 16 patients (four primary tumours were detected exclusively by FDG-PET). Seven patients had multiple distant metastases, that in six cases were detected exclusively by FDG-PET. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of unknown primary tumours were 100% and 94%, respectively. For the conventional diagnostic modalities these values were 92% and 76%. FDG-PET had an exclusive effect on the applied therapy in 20% of the patients referred for diagnosis of an unknown primary tumour. The data obtained in this study strongly support the diagnostic strategy of performing FDG-PET in patients suffering from cervical metastases of an unknown primary tumour before any other diagnostic technique.     

Evaluation of the clinical value of bone metabolic parameters for the screening of osseous metastases compared to bone scintigraphy

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are common in many types of cancer. As screening methods different imaging modalities are available. A new approach for the screening of osseous metastases represents the measurement of bone metabolic markers. Therefore aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the determination of bone metabolic markers aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP, osteoblastic activity) and the carboxyterminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP, osteoclastic activity) for the detection of bone metastases associated with other malignancies. METHODS: 88 patients aged 21 - 82 years with malignant tumors were prospectively studied. The serum concentrations of PINP and ICTP were measured and compared to the results of bone scintigraphy, radiological bone series, CT, MRI and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Osseous metastases were found in 21 patients. 19 of them were correctly identified by bone scintigraphy (sensitivity: 90%). For bone metabolic markers results were as follows: ICTP sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 42%; PINP sensitivity: 24%, specificity: 96%. CONCLUSIONS: As markers of bone metabolism PINP and ICTP showed low sensitivity and/or specificity for the detection of osseous metastases. The presented markers did not seem to be sufficient enough to identify patients with bone metastases or to replace established screening methods.     

Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy

In a double-blind, prospective study, the authors analyzed bone scintigrams and magnetic resonance (MR) images of the spine in 71 patients with histologically proved skeletal metastases. Bone scintigrams and MR images were separately reviewed by four independent observers. Bone scintigraphy permitted identification of 499 abnormal vertebrae and MR imaging, 818 abnormal vertebrae. MR imaging depicted additional abnormal vertebrae in 49 patients. The authors conclude that MR imaging is more sensitive than bone scintigraphy in detection of vertebral metastases.     

Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MR imaging, skeletal scintigraphy, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for the detection of bone metastases in children. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine children and young adults who were 2--19 years old and who had Ewing's sarcoma, osteosarcoma, lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, melanoma, and Langerhans' cell histiocytosis underwent whole-body spin-echo MR imaging, skeletal scintigraphy, and FDG PET for the initial staging of bone marrow metastases. The number and location of bone and bone marrow lesions diagnosed with each imaging modality were correlated with biopsy and clinical follow-up as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients exhibited 51 bone metastases. Sensitivities for the detection of bone metastases were 90% for FDG PET, 82% for whole-body MR imaging, and 71% for skeletal scintigraphy; these data were significantly different (p < 0.05). False-negative lesions were different for the three imaging modalities, mainly depending on lesion location. Most false-positive lesions were diagnosed using FDG PET. CONCLUSION: Whole-body MR imaging has a higher sensitivity than skeletal scintigraphy for the detection of bone marrow metastases but a lower sensitivity than FDG PET.     

Meta-analysis: comparison of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic properties of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy in the detection of osseous metastases in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of osseous metastasis were systematically searched for in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EBM Review databases from January 1995 to November 2006. Two reviewers independently abstracted data including research design, sample size, imaging technique and technical characteristics, reference standard, method of image interpretation, and totals of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. Per-patient and per-lesion pooled sensitivity and specificity, and area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated using Meta-Test software. RESULTS: The pooled patient-based sensitivity for FDG-PET was 81% (95% CI: 70%-89%), specificity was 93% (95% CI: 84%-97%), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.08. The pooled sensitivity of bone scan was 78% (95% CI: 67%-86%), specificity was 79% (95% CI: 40%-95%), and the AUC was 0.43. The pooled lesion-based sensitivity for FDG-PET was 69% (95% CI: 28%-93%), specificity was 98% (95% CI: 87%-100%), and the AUC was 0.09. The pooled sensitivity for bone scan was 88% (95% CI: 82%-92%), specificity was 87% (95% CI: 29%-99%), and the AUC was 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: It remains inconclusive whether FDG-PET or bone scintigraphy is superior in detecting osseous metastasis from breast cancer. However, FDG-PET does have a higher specificity and may better serve as a confirmatory test than bone scintigraphy and used to monitor response to therapy.     

Radiopharmaceutical therapy for palliation of bone pain from osseous metastases.

Bone metastasis occurs as a result of a complex pathophysiologic process between host and tumor cells leading to cellular invasion, migration adhesion, and stimulation of osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity. The process is mediated by parathyroid hormones, cytokines, and tumor-derived factors. Several sequelae occur as a result of osseous metastases and resulting bone pain can lead to significant debilitation. Pain associated with osseous metastasis is thought to be distinct from neuropathic or inflammatory pain. Several mechanisms-such as invasion of tumor cells, spinal cord astrogliosis, and sensitization of nervous system-have been postulated to cause pain. Pharmaceutical therapy of bone pain includes nonsteroidal analgesics and opiates. These drugs are associated with side effects, and tolerance to these agents necessitates treatment with other modalities. Bisphosphonates act by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated resorption and have been increasingly used in treatment of painful bone metastasis. While external beam radiation therapy remains the mainstay of pain palliation of solitary lesions, bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have entered the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of multiple painful osseous lesions. (32)P has been used for >3 decades in the treatment of multiple osseous metastases. The myelosuppression caused by this agent has led to the development of other bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, including (89)SrCl, (153)Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid ((153)Sm-EDTMP), (179m)SnCl, and (166)Ho-Labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetramethylenephosphonate ((166)Ho-DOTMP). (89)Sr is a bone-seeking radionuclide, whereas (153)Sm-EDTMP is a bone-seeking tetraphosphonate; both have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of painful osseous metastases. While both agents have been shown to have efficacy in the treatment of painful osseous metastases from prostate cancer, they may also have utility in the treatment of painful osseous metastases from breast cancer and perhaps from non-small cell lung cancer. This article illustrates the salient features of these radiopharmaceuticals, including the approved dose, method of administration, and indications for use. We conclude with recommended guidelines for therapy and follow-up.     

Diagnostic performance of whole-body bone scintigraphy in combination with SPECT/CT for detection of bone metastases

Annals of Nuclear Medicine - This retrospective study investigated the performance of whole-body bone scintigraphy combined with SPECT/CT and established a grading diagnostic criterion for bone...     

CT灌注成像对单发骨转移瘤与原发恶性骨肿瘤的鉴别

目的 探讨CT灌注成像在单发骨转移瘤与原发恶性骨肿瘤鉴别诊断中价值.方法 回顾性分析经手术病理证实的14例单发骨转移瘤和15例原发恶性骨肿瘤的CT灌注检查.结果 单发骨转移瘤和原发恶性骨肿瘤在灌注参数方面无明显不同,但在是否伴有高灌注的软组织肿块或低灌注的中央坏死区方面有明显不同:单发骨转移瘤是2例(14.3%),原发恶性骨肿瘤是13例(86.7%).结论 CT灌注成像有助于鉴别单发骨转移瘤与原发恶性骨肿瘤,可以详细全面提供医生制定手术计划所需要的骨肿瘤的性质和血供情况的信息.