首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
目的探讨对于有胆总管探查指征的患者行腹腔镜下行胆囊切除术时经胆囊管行胆道造影的应用价值。方法分析术前检查和术中检查有胆总管探查相对指征的21例患者术中胆道造影的情况。结果21例中18例无异常,3例阳性。结论腹腔镜下经胆囊管术中胆道造影可避免不必要的开腹胆总管探查,提高胆道结石诊断率,避免遗漏,是一种取代传统胆总管切开探查的行之安全简便的方法。  相似文献   

2.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道造影的价值   总被引:3,自引:1,他引:2  
目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)术中胆道造影的临床价值及适应证。方法2003年1月-2006年1月我院对165例行LC术中经胆囊管胆道造影(intraoperative cholangiography,IOC),根据造影结果指导LC术中操作,调整手术方案。结果165例LC术中经胆囊管胆道造影发现胆囊管变异22例,胆囊管结石12例,合并胆总管结石8例。本组无胆道损伤,避免胆总管阴性探查7例。结论LC术中经胆囊管胆道造影对于预防术中胆道损伤、减少胆总管阴性探查具有重要价值。  相似文献   

3.
术中胆道造影的临床应用和评价   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
目的:评价术中胆道造影在胆道手术中的临床价值。方法:1995年1月~1998年12月,行胆道手术中选择性胆道造影365例,其中经胆囊营造影263例;T营造影87例;肝门部胆管穿刺造影5例。结果:假阳性11例,假阴性5例,准确率95.62%。结论:术中胆道造影在降低胆道残石率,避免胆总管阴性探查,指导制定合理的术式,以及避免胆管损伤等方面具有较大临床价值。建设在下列情况下积极行术中胆道造影:(1)胆总管切开探查取石后;(2)胆囊结石伴有胆总管探查相对指征者;(3)肝内结石拟行胆肠内引流、复杂的胆道手术及胆囊切除术中发现胆道有可疑变异者。  相似文献   

4.
胆囊切除术中胆管造影对检出胆管结石的价值与指征   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
岳正学  蒋为众 《外科》1997,2(4):206-207
目的:分析胆囊切除术时胆管造影检出胆管结石的价值和指征。病例和方法:1988年迄今共行胆囊切除646例。病例分三组,第一组304例妆行胆管造影和探查(造影组);第二组107例未行胆管造影而直接胆道探查(探查组);第三每235例行单纯胆囊切除。结果:第一组胆石检出率为94%,第二组胆石检出率53%;第三组术后随访有残石2例。结论:术中胆管造影有助于:①降低术后胆道残石率;②避免不必要的胆道探查;③明  相似文献   

5.
目的评价选择性行经胆囊管胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)术中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析113例在LC术中选择性行经胆囊管造影的患者的临床资料。结果术中造影成功108例,成功率为95.6%,术中发现胆总管结石16例,胆管变异3例,胆管损伤1例。结论在LC术中行选择性经胆囊管造影,可协助确诊胆道结石残留,避免不必要的胆道阴性探查,并可避免和发现胆管损伤,对于提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的质量和安全性具有重要临床价值。  相似文献   

6.
腹腔镜术中胆总管的探查   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1  
目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用胆道镜探查的方法及价值。方法 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对5例疑有胆系疾病的患行纤维胆道镜检查和治疗。结果 胆总管探查未见异常1例,胆管结石4例,其中3例在腹腔镜下经胆囊管取石成功,1例中转开腹。结论 LC术中应用纤维胆道镜可对胆总管进行探查和治疗。扩大了LC手术适应证范围。提高了一期手术的治愈率。  相似文献   

7.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道造影的临床应用   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
目的 探讨选择性术中胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析125例经腹腔镜胆囊切除术中选择性经胆囊管插管行胆道造影的临床资料。结果 术中造影发现胆总管结石22例,胆总管下端狭窄4例,胆管损伤1例,副肝管2例。结论 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中选择性经胆囊管行胆道造影对降低胆管结石的残留,减少不必要的胆管阴性探查,辨明胆道解剖,避免及发现胆管损伤,提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的质量和安全性有重要价值。  相似文献   

8.
刮吸解剖法在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用   总被引:3,自引:2,他引:3  
目的探讨刮吸解剖法在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)中的应用价值。方法2002年8月-2008年1月,借助腹腔镜多功能手术解剖器(laparoscopic Peng,s multifunctional operative dissector,LPMOD)应用刮吸解剖法对820例急性胆囊炎施行LC。对有胆道相对探查指征的158例(143例有胆总管扩张)行术中胆道造影,发现胆总管结石17例,其中14例完成腹腔镜下胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)。结果812例LC成功,8例中转开腹。LC平均手术时间55 min(25-120 min),LC+LCBDE平均手术时间95 min(80-130min),术中平均出血量25 ml(0.5-80 ml),术后平均住院5 d(3-9 d)。无胆管损伤、胆漏、术后出血等并发症。804例随访2-18个月,平均11个月,2例胆总管残余结石(1例行开腹胆总管切开取石,1例行EST取石),其余患者未发现与手术相关并发症。结论在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用刮吸解剖法能有效防止术中胆道损伤,安全可靠,值得临床推广。  相似文献   

9.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的开展和影像学的进步给胆总管结石的诊断和处理带来了深刻的变化。作者回顾性分析了过去14年中 ,在腹腔镜胆囊切除术开展前后胆总管结石处理上的不同 ,提出了对疑有胆总管结石病人的处理指征和方法。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术开展前的 1983年~ 1990年间 ,作者进行了 2 88例胆囊切除术 ,其中 89.2 %病人采用了术中胆管造影 ,6 3例病人进行了胆总管探查 ,选择胆总管探查的指征为 :近期出现黄疸或胰腺炎、有胆总管扩张、有胆管炎表现、胆红素或 (和 ) AKP升高、多发性胆囊小结石伴有胆囊管增粗、术中胆道造影异常。结果只有 33例…  相似文献   

10.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床价值.方法:回顾分析2006年6月至2011年5月256例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者的临床资料,均于腹腔镜胆囊切除术( laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)中切开胆总管,行纤维胆道镜胆总管探查取石.结果:256例手术均获成功...  相似文献   

11.
Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), an increase in accidental common bile duct (CBD) injuries of up to 1.2-1.6% has been reported. In the present prospective study of 1,710 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (1,241 LC procedures and 469 open cholecystectomies [OC]), we tested the predicative value of routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). The IOC was feasible in 92.4% of the cases in the LC group and in 83% of cases in the OC group and presented a complete depiction of the extrahepatic bile system in 98.3%. Anatomic variations of the bile duct system, which influenced the operative management, were found in 13.2% of cases (13.4% LC versus 12.8% OC). In 2.5% of the patients, preoperatively undetected CBD stones were also found. Method-specific complications did not occur in any of the patients. Additionally, in a controlled subgroup analysis of 163 patients, we evaluated preoperative intravenous cholangiography (IVC) and IOC. Intravenous cholangiography showed only 72.4% of the operation-relevant anatomic variations (vs. 100% by IOC); in 6.1% of the cases, there were reactions to the dye (vs. none in IOC), and in only 28.6% of the patients, CBD stones were detected (vs. 71.4% IOC). There were four bile duct injuries (0.29%) during LC and two (0.4%) during OC. All injuries were detected intraoperatively and fixed in the same setting without postoperative complications. In conclusion, we recommend the use of routine IOC during cholecystectomy. By this technique, anatomic variations of the bile duct system will be visualized and therefore accidental injuries will be avoided.  相似文献   

12.
目的 为避免胆总管结石误探和漏探,分析腹腔镜胆管造影在胆管探查中的应用价值.方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月完成的230例腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)、胆总管探查术(LCBDE)患者的临床资料,选取腹腔镜术中胆管造影(intraoperative cholangiography,IOC)的患者41例作为观察组...  相似文献   

13.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道造影的临床探讨   总被引:6,自引:2,他引:4  
目的 :减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆总管残留结石的发生率。方法 :根据病史及术前B超检查结果 ,对可疑胆总管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道造影 ,明确胆道情况。结果 :同期行LC 6 5 0例 ,术中胆道造影 89例 ,成功 78例 ,成功率 87 6 4% ,术中发现胆总管结石 19例 ,占同期LC总数的 2 92 %。结论 :术中胆道造影成功率高 ,显像清晰 ,是一种良好的胆道检查方法 ,为腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成功奠定了基础 ,同时也使患者避免了二次手术的痛苦  相似文献   

14.
Background  The management of symptomatic or incidentally discovered common bile duct (CBD) stones is still controversial. Of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 5–15% will also harbor CBD stones, and those with symptoms suggestive of choledocholithiasis will have an even higher incidence. Options for treatment include preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy (ERCP/ES) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (LC/IOC), followed by either laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) or placement of a common bile duct double-lumen catheter with postoperative management. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the optimal management of such patients. Methods  A decision analysis was performed to analyze the management of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. The basic choice was between preoperative ERCP/ES followed by LC, LC/IOC followed by LCBDE, or common duct double-lumen catheter (Fitzgibbons tube) placement with either expectant management or postoperative ERCP/ES. Data on morbidity and mortality was obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analysis was done varying the incidence of positive CBD stones on IOC with associated morbidity and mortality. Results  One-stage management of symptomatic CBD stones with LC/LCBDE is associated with less morbidity and mortality (7% and 0.19%) than two-stage management utilizing preoperative ERCP/ES (13.5% and 0.5%). Sensitivity analysis shows that there is an increase in morbidity and mortality for LC/LCBDE as the incidence of positive IOC increases but are still less than two-stage management even with a 100% positive IOC (9.4%, 0.5%). If a double-lumen catheter is to be used for positive IOC, the morbidity would be higher than two-stage management only if the positive IOC incidence is more than 65% but still with no mortality. Conclusion  LCBDE has lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to preoperative ERCP/ES in the management of patients with suspected CBD stones even if the chance of CBD stones reaches 100%. Using a common duct double-lumen catheter may be considered if LCBDE is not feasible and the chance of CBD stone is less than 65%. Presented in part at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [Poster Session], San Diego, CA, May 17–21, 2008  相似文献   

15.
选择性胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopy cholecystectomy,LC)中开展选择性的胆道造影技术及其临床应用价值。方法对98例术中胆道造影患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果同期LC 862例,术中胆道造影98例,造影成功90例,成功率为91.8%。术中发现胆管结石7例,胆管损伤1例,胆道解剖异常2例。结论选择性术中胆道造影操作简便安全,成功率高,显影清晰,可有效降低胆管结石的残余率和胆管损伤的发生率,避免不必要的胆道探查,提高LC手术的安全性。  相似文献   

16.
目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术中常规应用和选择性应用胆道造影的效果.方法 常规术中胆道造影组1 520例,选择性术中胆道造影组457例.采用自制造影器或输液针头完成术中造影,比较2组的造影时间、造影成功率、胆总管结石发现率、胆管解剖变异发现率、医源性胆管损伤发生率、中转开腹率以及术后住院时间.结果 2组病例在造影时间、造影成功率、中转开腹率以及术后住院时间方面的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);选择性造影组的胆总管结石发现率、胆管解剖变异发现率以及医源性胆管损伤发生率均高于常规造影组(28.25%比13.43%,10.71%比7.43%,2.05%比1.02%,P<0.05).结论 在开展腹腔镜胆囊切除术的早期,应采用常规术中胆道造影,以避免医源性胆管损伤的发生和胆总管结石残留.待技术纯熟以后,可以选择性地进行术中胆道造影.  相似文献   

17.
Background The use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), routinely rather than selectively, during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. Recent findings have shown laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) to be safe, quick, and effective not only for screening of the bile duct for stones, but also for evaluating the biliary anatomy. This study aimed to evaluate, on the basis of the LC outcome and the cost of LUS and IOC, whether and how much the routine use of LUS would be able to reduce the need for IOC. Methods During LC, LUS was used routinely to screen the bile duct for stones and to evaluate the biliary anatomy, whereas IOC was used selectively only when LUS was unsatisfactory or unsuccessful. Results For 193 (96.5%) of 200 patients, LUS was completed successfully, whereas IOC was needed for 7 patients (3.5%). Bile duct stones were identified in 20 patients (10%). For the detection of bile duct stones, LUS yielded 19 true-positive, 175 true-negative, 0 false-positive, and 1 false-negative results. It had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 99.4%. The postoperative complications included bile leaks from the liver bed in two patients and a retained bile duct stone in one patient. If IOC had been used selectively in a traditional manner on the basis of preoperative risk factors, IOC would have been needed for 77 patients (38.5%). The total cost of LUS plus IOC for the current 200 patients was $26,256. The total estimated cost of selective IOC, if it had been performed for the 77 patients, would have been $31,416. Conclusions Routine LUS accurately diagnosed bile duct stones and significantly reduced the need for selective IOC from a potential 38.5% to an actual 3.5% without adversely affecting the outcome of the LC or increasing the overall cost. The routine use of LUS during LC is accurate and cost effective.  相似文献   

18.
Background  There is debate about whether intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) should be performed routinely or selectively during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. The timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in these patients also is an issue. We reviewed the experience in our center, where a management algorithm limiting ERCP in relation to LC was adopted. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed every LC performed by one surgeon during 6 years and the related ERCPs. Results  A total of 264 LCs were performed. In 30 patients, stones were cleared or excluded by preoperative ERCP. In the remaining 234 LCs, 31 of 34 IOCs were successfully performed. Two of 31 IOCs were positive for bile duct stones; stone removal was successful in each patient at subsequent ERCP. Only 10 of 201 patients who did not have IOC required postsurgical ERCP within 10 weeks of LC, 3 of whom had common bile duct stones at ERCP. Conclusions  For patients who underwent LC, we performed selective IOC with postoperative ERCP for positive studies. Review of our experience using this algorithm showed it to be a powerful tool in limiting unnecessary ERCPs. Our data suggest that routine preoperative ERCP cannot be justified. Selective IOC during LC misses relatively few cases of biliary stones; these can be managed quickly by experienced endoscopists.  相似文献   

19.
Background Intraoperative fluorocholangiography (IOC) has been the standard method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) has been evaluated as a possible alternative, but has been used less frequently. The authors examined the evolving use of these two methods to assess the relative utility of LUS as the primary method for routine bile duct imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods This study analyzed a prospective database containing 423 consecutive cholecystectomies performed by one attending surgeon in an academic medical center between 1995 and 2005. Results Intraoperative bile duct imaging was performed in 371 (94%) of 396 LCs performed for cholelithiasis. As recorded, IOC was performed in 239 cases, LUS in 236 cases, and both in 104 cases. Choledocholithiasis was present in 50 patients (13%). Common bile duct stones (CBDS) were identified by LUS in 3% of the patients without preoperative indicators of CBDS, and in 10% of the patients with one or more indicators. As shown by the findings, LUS had a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 99.6%, a sensitivity of 92.3%, and a specificity of 100% for detecting CBDS. Also, LUS identified clinically significant bile duct anatomy in 6% of the patients. In 1995, LUS was used for 20% of cases, whereas by 2005, it was used for 97% of cases. Conversely, the use of IOC decreased from 93% to 23%. Conclusions With moderate experience, LUS can become the primary routine imaging method for evaluating the bile duct during LC. It is as reliable as IOC for detecting choledocholithiasis. In addition, LUS can locate the common bile duct during difficult dissections. On the basis of this experience, LUS is used currently in nearly all LCs and is the sole method for bile duct imaging in 75% of these cases. IOC is used as an adjunct to LUS when LUS imaging is inadequate, when stronger clinical indicators of choledocholithiasis are present, or when biliary anatomy remains uncertain.  相似文献   

20.
腹腔镜超声检查在胆囊切除胆道探查术中的应用   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
目的:探讨腹腔镜超声检查在胆囊切除胆道探查术中的应用价值。方法:腹腔镜下对126例腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术患者常规行腹腔镜超声检查,并选择其中30例行术中胆管造影。与腹腔镜超声检查行对比研究。结果:腹腔镜超声检查平均时间17min,对胆道系统和血管系统扫描结果显示:胆囊和门静脉100%显像,肝胆管,胆总管97%显像,胆总管未端85%显像,腹腔镜超声检查和术中胆管造影对比结果显未腹腔镜超声检查的胆总管检查成功率及胆管结石的敏感性,特异性及总诊断成功率均优于术中胆管造(影(分别为97%,82%,97%,98%和80%,75%,95%,95%)。结论:腹腔镜超声检查的应用有助于判断胆道系统的解剖结构,防止发生胆管损伤,有助于发现或排除肝内外胆管结石,为胆管造影及胆道探查术提供重要指标。降低了胆道残石和阴性胆道探查术的发生率。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号