Dose verification for patients undergoing IMRT.

At Emory Clinic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was started by using dynamic multileaf collimators (dMLC) as electronic tissue compensators in August 1998. Our IMRT program evolved with the inclusion of a commercially available inverse treatment planning system in September 1999. While the introduction of electronic tissue compensators into clinical use did not affect the customary radiation oncology practice, inverse treatment planning does alter our basic routines. Basic concepts of radiation therapy port designs for inverse treatment planning are different from conventional or 3D conformal treatments. With inverse treatment planning, clinicians are required to outline a gross tumor volume (GTV), a clinical target volume (CTV), critical normal structures, and to design a planning target volume (PTV). Clinicians do not designate the volume to be shielded. Because each IMRT radiation portal is composed of many beamlets with varying intensities, methods and practice used to verify delivered dose from IMRT portals are also different from conventional treatment portals. Often, the validity of measured data is in doubt. Therefore, checking treatment planning computer output with measurements are confusing and fruitless, at times. Commissioning an IMRT program and routine patient dose verification of IMRT require films and ionization chamber measurements in phantom. Additional specialized physics instrumentation is not required other than those available in a typical radiation oncology facility. At this time, we consider that routine quality assurance prior to patient treatments is necessary.     

多叶准直器质量保证模体在Truebeam加速器中的应用研究

目的 利用多叶准直器(MLC)质量保证(QA)模体,对Truebeam加速器执行常规质量保证程序,检验MLC在治疗计划执行过程中的可靠性.方法 MLC QA模体是对MLC进行质量保证的专用模体,呈"L"形,嵌有5颗实心钢珠.模体在Truebeam加速器治疗床上进行摆位.在Eclipse v10.0治疗计划系统中,创建一个QA计划,包含叶片位置检测、叶片宽度检测、Multi-Port检测和叶片间漏射检测等信息.通过电子射野影像系统(EPID),获取MLC和模体的影像.按同样的操作对MLC执行每周1次,共6周的检测,并将影像导入PIPSpro软件进行分析.结果 叶片位置检测的误差结果为(0.21±0.02) mm;叶片宽度检测的误差结果为(0.04±0.02) mm;Multi-Port检测的误差结果为(0.26±0.04) mm;叶片透射检测叶片间的漏射结果为1.0%±0.14%.结论 Truebeam加速器的MLC系统运行状态良好,MLC QA模体是一个简单实用的质量保证工具.     

Dosimetric correction for a six degrees carbon fiber couch

We investigated experimentally and clinically the influence of a six degree (6D) carbon fiber couch on conventional radiation therapy. We used 4, 6 and 10 MV X-rays and compared dose distributions based on correction methods, i.e. monitor unit (MU) addition, including computed tomography (CT) couch, and the couch modeling. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical value of dosimetric correction for the 6D couch in 30 patients treated with multi-field irradiation. In the phantom study, the maximum difference of isocenter doses attributable to the 6D couch was 5.1%; the difference was reduced with increasing X-ray energy. Although the isocenter dose based on each correction method was precise within ±1%, MU addition underestimated the surface dose. In the clinical study, the maximum difference of isocenter doses attributable to the 6D couch was 2.7%. The correction methods for the 6D couch provide for highly precise treatment planning. However, the clinical indication of complicated correction methods should be considered for each institution or each patient, because the influence of the 6D couch was reduced with multi-field irradiation.     

An integrated radiotherapy treatment system and its clinical application

A new total system for radiation therapy installed in our department consists of a linear accelerator unit with microcomputer-controlled multileaf collimators, along with a CT scanner installed in the same treatment room. Also included are a digitally controlled communal couch, a minicomputer, and a system of treatment planning devices. We have developed various kinds of external radiation treatment planning techniques (including dynamic ones) with this system on the basis of the concept of dose corresponding technique. A reference point setup method is needed to maintain a unified coordinate system through each step of the treatment procedure, and, as developed by us, permits a volume-oriented setup. This system has been evaluated for accuracy in a variety of clinical setups. A true three-dimensional dose calculation algorithm is required for treatment planning associated with multileaf collimator treatments in order to realize the potential accuracy of such a system.     

Define baseline levels of segments per beam for intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery for brain,head and neck,thoracic, abdominal,and prostate applications

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the number of segments per beam for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments and its effects on the plan quality, treatment delivery time, machine quality assurance, and machine maintenance. We have retrospectively analyzed 24 patients treated with IMRT. Five were selected within each of the following regions: head and neck, thoracic, abdomen, and prostate. Four patients were optimized within the brain region. The clinically treated plans were re-optimized using Philips Pinnacle3 v. 8 with the direct machine parameter optimization algorithm. The number of segments per beam from the treated plan was systematically reduced by 80%, 60%, 40%, and 30%, and the following statistics have been analyzed for plan quality: target min, mean, and max doses; critical structure doses; and integral dose. We have attempted to define the smallest number of segments per beam for IMRT treatment plans. Results indicate that IMRT plans can be delivered with acceptable quality with approximately 3–6 segments per beam for the anatomical regions analyzed. A reduction in the number of segments decreases treatment delivery time, reduces machine wear and tear, and minimizes the amount of time the patient is on the treatment table, which in turn reduces the chances of intrafractional uncertainties.     

A novel end-to-end test for combined dosimetric and geometric treatment verification using a 3D-printed phantom

The dosimetric and geometric accuracy are important components to ensure safe patient treatment in radiation therapy. Therefore, these components must be checked during quality control. This work presents a possible solution for the determination of the geometric isocenter deviation in the entire treatment chain. Additionally, the dose measurement of the established end-to-end test workflow measured in the same procedure as the geometric deviation is described. An in-house designed end-to-end test phantom went through the entire procedure of a standard patient treatment and the dosimetric and geometric accuracy were determined. At 3 linear accelerators (linac), the phantom was positioned either with cone beam computed tomography or with surface guidance. In this position, a Winston-Lutz test was performed and the deviations of the gantry, collimator and couch isocenter measurements to the phantom position were determined. Additionally, a dose measurement in the phantom was performed and compared to the dose predicted in the treatment planning system. To validate the results obtained with the in-house designed phantom, comparative measurements with commercial phantoms were performed. According to the performed end-to-end test, 2 out of the 3 linacs showed isocenter variations larger than 1 mm for collimator and gantry rotations and larger than 2 mm for couch rotations. With an isocenter variation of less than 1 mm for collimator and gantry rotations, 1 linac fulfilled the tolerance for stereotactic treatments without couch rotation. With couch rotation, an isocenter variation of less than 2 mm was detected at this linac, which fulfilled the tolerance for IMRT treatments. The mean dose deviation between measurement and treatment planning system was 1.82% ± 1.03%. The results acquired with the UMM phantom did not show statistically significant deviations to those acquired with relevant other commercial phantoms. The novel end-to-end test procedure allows for a combined dosimetric and geometric treatment evaluation. Besides the commonly performed dose end-to-end test the geometric isocenter deviation within a patient treatment workflow was evaluated and categorized for IMRT or SBRT.     

Real-time image-processing algorithm for markerless tumour tracking using X-ray fluoroscopic imaging

Objective:

To ensure accuracy in respiratory-gating treatment, X-ray fluoroscopic imaging is used to detect tumour position in real time. Detection accuracy is strongly dependent on image quality, particularly positional differences between the patient and treatment couch. We developed a new algorithm to improve the quality of images obtained in X-ray fluoroscopic imaging and report the preliminary results.

Methods:

Two oblique X-ray fluoroscopic images were acquired using a dynamic flat panel detector (DFPD) for two patients with lung cancer. The weighting factor was applied to the DFPD image in respective columns, because most anatomical structures, as well as the treatment couch and port cover edge, were aligned in the superior–inferior direction when the patient lay on the treatment couch. The weighting factors for the respective columns were varied until the standard deviation of the pixel values within the image region was minimized. Once the weighting factors were calculated, the quality of the DFPD image was improved by applying the factors to multiframe images.

Results:

Applying the image-processing algorithm produced substantial improvement in the quality of images, and the image contrast was increased. The treatment couch and irradiation port edge, which were not related to a patient''s position, were removed. The average image-processing time was 1.1 ms, showing that this fast image processing can be applied to real-time tumour-tracking systems.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that this image-processing algorithm improves the image quality in patients with lung cancer and successfully removes objects not related to the patient.

Advances in knowledge:

Our image-processing algorithm might be useful in improving gated-treatment accuracy.The image guidance technique quantifies intra-/interfractional changes in anatomical structures of the patient and is a key factor in improving treatment accuracy. A number of techniques have been introduced and several have been integrated for clinical use in both photon beam and particle beam therapy.^1,2 A number of treatment centres now use the respiratory-gated strategy for thoracic and abdominal treatment, and generally use external gating for respiratory monitoring. External gating is generally performed using tagging points with reflective artificial markers on the patient''s abdomen. However, normal irregularity in respiratory patterns might result in inconsistencies between the external respiratory signal and internal target movement (e.g. phase shift/drift),³ which in the worst case might cause the treatment beam to miss the tumour if applied using only the external respiratory signal.To solve this problem, photon beam and particle beam treatment centres have installed X-ray fluoroscopic systems for the direct capture of tumour positions in real time.^4–6 The use of an implanted fiducial marker strongly facilitates the detection of tumour positions, but is somewhat invasive owing to the risk of pneumothorax on insertion,⁷ and cannot be used in all patients owing to patient condition. Tumour position tracking without a marker has therefore been introduced.^6,8 This technique is dependent on good quality images for calculating normalized cross-correlation. Although X-ray fluoroscopic imaging involves significantly less X-ray radiation exposure than does treatment beam, radiological protection nevertheless requires that this exposure be minimized. As an additional safety issue, while the position of the patient is adjusted according to treatment planning, the relationship between the patient position and treatment couch can differ among consecutive treatment fractions. Since markerless tumour-tracking systems operate within the current image and output a treatment gate signal to the treatment beam delivery system before the next frame, they require a short image-processing time. By contrast, the trade-off between complex image processing, such as processing utilizing neural networks, and image quality is well known.To solve these problems, we developed an image-processing algorithm to improve the image quality of X-ray fluoroscopic images. Here, we report the preliminary results of two patients with lung cancer.     

A novel restricted single-isocenter stereotactic body radiotherapy (RESIST) method for synchronous multiple lung lesions to minimize setup uncertainties

Treating multiple lung lesions synchronously using a single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plan can improve treatment efficiency and patient compliance. However, due to set up uncertainty, aligning multiple lung tumors on a single daily cone beam CT (CBCT) image has shown clinically unacceptable loss of target(s) coverage. Herein, we propose a Restricted Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (RESIST), an alternative treatment that mitigates patient setup uncertainties. Twenty-one patients with two lung lesions were treated with single-isocenter VMAT-SBRT using a 6MV-FFF beam to 54 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 7) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 14) prescribed to 70-80% isodose line. To minimize setup uncertainties, each plan was re-planned using the RESIST method, utilizing a single-isocenter placed at the patient's mediastinum. It allows for an individual plan to be created for each tumor, using the first plan as the base-dose for the second plan, while still allowing both tumors to be treated in the same session. The technique uses novel features in Eclipse, including dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based dose and aperture shape controller before each VMAT optimization. RESIST plans provided better target dose conformity (p < 0.001) and gradient indices (p < 0.001) and lower dose to adjacent critical organs. Using RESIST to treat synchronous lung lesions with VMAT-SBRT significantly reduces plan complexity as demonstrated by smaller beam modulation factors (p < 0.001), without unreasonably increasing treatment time. RESIST reduces the chance of a geometric miss due by allowing CBCT matching of one tumor at a time. Placement of isocenter at the mediastinum avoids potential patient/gantry collisions, provides greater flexibility of noncoplanar arcs and eliminates the need for multiple couch movements during CBCT imaging. Efficacy of RESIST has been demonstrated for two lesions and can potentially be used for more lesions. Clinical implementation of this technique is ongoing.     

Quality control (QC) of CT on rail system (FOCAL Unit) with a micro-multi leaf collimator (mMLC) using new GafChromic film for stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Recent years, CT on rail system was reported to be useful as a tool for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). This system was clinically developed with the aim of stereotactic irradiation (STI) for brain, lung, liver, prostate and other sites. Quality assurance and quality control (QC) is an important issue in CT on rail system to assure geometric accuracies. The purpose of this study is to estimate the geometric accuracies of our CT on rail system using a detachable micro-multi leaf collimator (mMLC) with new type radiochromic films. Carrying out our original QC program, translational errors, setup reproducibility, beam misalignment and beam characteristics were evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have studied with CT on rail system (FOCAL unit, Toshiba Medical systems, Tokyo, Japan) and mMLC unit (Accuknife, Direx Inc., Tokyo, Japan). We have developed original alignment phantom and small steel markers (2 mm phi) were implanted on its surface at certain intervals. Firstly, we have evaluated the accuracy of self-moving CT gantry and CT resolutions for cranio-caudal directions by changing slice thickness. And then using the phantom, we have measured the accuracy and reproducibility of geometric isocenter of the linac side and the CT gantry side by scanning the phantom. We have also measured the geometric changes of the common treatment couch by weight-loaded test (up to 135 kgw). To estimate dosimetric and geometric accuracies with the mMLC unit, the misalignment of the beam axes (gantry, collimator and couch rotation axis), mMLC leaf positions, and dose distributions for the verification plan were measured with new type GafChromic films (GafChromic-RTQA, ISP Inc., USA) and cylindrical phantom. The dose characteristics of the GafChromic film were also evaluated. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the self-moving CT gantry have a good agreement within 1 mm. Weight-load test have shown a good reliability within 2 mm at the common treatment couch. The translational precision of the common treatment couch was 0.0 +/- 0.1 mm at linac side and -0.2 +/- 0.5 mm at CT gantry side. The misalignments of beam axes have been kept within 0.4 mm at maximum. Gap test have shown the accuracies of the mMLC leaf positions, which is needed to keep within 1 mm by a routine calibration. CONCLUSIONS: To practice quality control program for the FOCAL unit and the mMLC unit is essential for a regular interval to reduce systematic errors. New type radiochromic film would be useful for a verification tool as alternative to conventional film.     

Treatment of medulloblastoma using a computer-controlled tracking cobalt unit

Radiation therapy of the length of the spinal column presents various clinical and physical problems. The completed plan may be complicated to set up, be time-consuming and require daily variation to achieve reasonable dose homogeneity. A case of medulloblastoma is used to illustrate the steps in producing a plan for dynamic treatment using a computer-controlled tracking cobalt unit. After definition by computed tomography, the target is considered in segments in order to develop a plan which keeps the spinal cord constantly positioned at the beam isocentre. The main computer is used to develop the patient treatment file and information is transferred to a second computer which controls and monitors the safe functioning of the cobalt unit. The cranial fields are treated separately in a conventional way. Good and consistent control of the dose distribution is achieved along the entire target volume. This technique is a marked improvement over all existing methods of treating the spinal axis.     

Quality assurance in dynamic radiotherapy techniques

Compared with conventional radiation treatment techniques, quality assurance for dynamic techniques has to consider additionally the variability of the movement parameters of the treatment unit. In this context the exactness and the reliability of the computer control are of special interest. In this paper the results of quality assurance for dynamic treatment techniques are reported. At first investigations concerning the reproducibility are carried out. Another test is the simulation of conventional moving beam techniques by external computer control. Further the differences between measured dose distributions of dynamic techniques and the distributions resulting from the sequence of fixed fields approximating these techniques are determined. Finally we compared measured and calculated dose distributions. The results of the investigations justify the introduction of dynamic radiation treatment techniques into clinical use.     

基于食管癌放射治疗计划的剂量学研究

目的应用三维治疗计划系统（3D—TPS）比较研究食管癌的不同照射方法，评价常规三野等中心照射（RT）、三维适形（3D～CRT）、调强适形放射治疗（IMRT）在靶区剂量及正常组织保护方面的不同。方法采用三维治疗计划系统对12例经病理证实的中下段食管癌的患者CT定位图像分别设计3种放射治疗计划，分别为RT，3 D—CRT，IMRT，计划的处方剂量均为50 Gy，通过治疗计划及剂量体积直方图（DVH）比较靶区及危及器官剂量的差异。结果RT，3 D—CRT，IMRT的95％计划靶体积（PTV）及95％大体肿瘤体积（GTV）的剂量有统计学意义，3 D—CRT和IMRT优于RT；3种计划的靶区适形度指数、PTV剂量变异度指数、处方剂量覆盖GTV百分比均以IMRT计划为最好，3D—CRT、IMRT减少了双肺受照20 Gu体积百分比（V20），均有统计学意义；3种计划的脊髓最大所受剂量、心脏1／3体积的所受剂量均在可耐受的范围内，IMRT为最小，P〉0．05。结论3 D—CRT、IMRT在靶区适形度和靶区剂量上均优于RT，能获得均匀的剂量分布，且能降低周围敏感器官的所受剂量，正常组织所受剂量均能在耐受范围内。     

3D dose reconstruction to insure correct external beam treatment of patients.

Radiation therapy treatments have become increasingly more complicated. There are multiple opportunities for humans, machines, software, and combinations thereof to result in a treatment error that could be of significance. Current methods for quality assurance are often abstract in nature and may have unclear underlying assumptions as to what is assumed to be working correctly, or may depend upon the diligence of persons to discover errors from a review of the treatment plan. Here, an example will be shown of a direct method to reconstruct and demonstrate the dose and the dose distribution delivered to a particular patient. By measuring the radiation fields that come out of the accelerator, and using the measurement as input to a 3-dimensional (3D) dose algorithm, the delivered patient dose is determined and presented in a manner similar to the treatment plan. The intended treatment plan dose may be directly compared. Using this feedback mechanism, there is less abstraction and dependence upon the diligence of individuals checking multiple steps in a treatment process, and assumptions can be clearly stated. With this system, the dose is determined and presented minimizing assumptions and dependence upon other systems.     

Real-time dosimetry in external beam radiation therapy

With growing complexity in radiotherapy treatment delivery, it has become mandatory to check each and every treatment plan before implementing clinically. This process is currently administered by an independent secondary check of all treatment parameters and as a pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) check for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans. Although pre-treatment IMRT QA is aimed to ensure the correct dose is delivered to the patient, it does not necessarily predict the clinically relevant patient dose errors. During radiotherapy, treatment uncertainties can affect tumor control and may increase complications to surrounding normal tissues. To combat this, image guided radiotherapy is employed to help ensure the plan conditions are mimicked on the treatment machine. However, it does not provide information on actual delivered dose to the tumor volume. Knowledge of actual dose delivered during treatment aid in confirming the prescribed dose and also to replan/reassess the treatment in situations where the planned dose is not delivered as expected by the treating physician. Major accidents in radiotherapy would have been averted if real time dosimetry is incorporated as part of the routine radiotherapy procedure. Of late real-time dosimetry is becoming popular with complex treatments in radiotherapy. Real-time dosimetry can be either in the form of point doses or planar doses or projected on to a 3D image dataset to obtain volumetric dose. They either provide entrance dose or exit dose or dose inside the natural cavities of a patient. In external beam radiotherapy, there are four different established platforms whereby the delivered dose information can be obtained: (1) Collimator; (2) Patient; (3) Couch; and (4) Electronic Portal Imaging Device. Current real-time dosimetric techniques available in radiotherapy have their own advantages and disadvantages and a combination of one or more of these methods provide vital information about the actual dose delivered to radiotherapy patients.     

A retrospective evaluation of mixed energy volumetric modulated arc therapy for anal cancers with lymph node involvement

Applying dual, or mixed photon energies during radiation therapy is a common practice in 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Mixed photon energies are used to provide uniform dose coverage to a planning target volume (PTV) that ranges in depth from the skin surface. Though the application of mixed photon energies in 3D-CRT was once the convention for treating anal cancers with lymph node involvement (AC-LNI), the advantages offered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prove to be the optimal form of therapy for AC-LNI. Recently, multiple researchers have uncovered benefits in employing multiple photon energies in VMAT planning for prostate cancer. A retrospective study was completed to assess the impact of implementing mixed energy VMAT planning in comparison to conventional single energy VMAT planning for AC-LNI. Data from 20 patients with AC-LNI was collected to analyze the dosimetric effects of mixed energy VMAT treatments in terms of PTV conformity index, PTV homogeneity index, monitor unit usage, and organs at risk sparing. For each patient 3 treatment plans were created: a single energy 6 MV plan, a single energy 10 MV plan, and a mixed 6 MV and 10 MV energy plan. Analysis of the resulting dosimetric outcomes showed statistical significance. The current study concluded that mixed energy VMAT plans have some effect on treating AC-LNI when compared to single energy VMAT plans.     

Optical tracking technology in stereotactic radiation therapy.

The last decade has seen the introduction of advanced technologies that have enabled much more precise application of therapeutic radiation. These relatively new technologies include multileaf collimators, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning, and intensity modulated radiotherapy in radiotherapy. Therapeutic dose distributions have become more conformal to volumes of disease, sometimes utilizing sharp dose gradients to deliver high doses to target volumes while sparing nearby radiosensitive structures. Thus, accurate patient positioning has become even more important, so that the treatment delivered to the patient matches the virtual treatment plan in the computer treatment planning system. Optical and image-guided radiation therapy systems offer the potential to improve the precision of patient treatment by providing a more robust fiducial system than is typically used in conventional radiotherapy. The ability to accurately position internal targets relative to the linac isocenter and to provide real-time patient tracking theoretically enables significant reductions in the amount of normal tissue irradiated. This report reviews the concepts, technology, and clinical applications of optical tracking systems currently in use for stereotactic radiation therapy. Applications of radiotherapy optical tracking technology to respiratory gating and the monitoring of implanted fiducial markers are also discussed.     

Clinical use of a simulation-multileaf collimator

Background

At the University of Lübeck, radiotherapy is delivered by a 6/18-MV linear accelerator. Using the integrated multileaf collimator, irradiation of individually shaped treatment fields is possible in place of alloy blocks. Due to unsatisfactory pretherapeutic review of the radiation-field-specific multileaf collimator (MLC) configuration, we developed a simulation-multileaf collimator (SMLC) and assessed its feasibility at different tumor sites.

Material and Methods

The SMLC is made of a perspex carrier with 52 horizontal sliding leaves. The position of each leaf is calculated by a 3D treatment-planning computer. The technician manually adjusts the leaves according to the beams-eye-view plot of the planning computer. Consequently, the SMLC is mounted on the therapy simulator at a distance of 64.8 cm from the focus. The treatment fields and the position of the leaves are documented by X-ray films.

Results

Using the SMLC, radiation oncologists are able to review exactly the leaf configuration of each MLC-shaped radiation field and to correlate the MLC-shaped radiation field with the treated volume, the organs at risk and the port films acquired by the Portal Vision^® system.

Conclusion

The SMLC is a new tool to review radiation planning that uses an MLC in daily routine. The use of the SMLC improves the documentation and the quality assurance. It accelerates the treatment field review at the linear accelerator by comparing the SMLC simulator films with the portal images.     

Where goest the Peacock?

Since the treatment of the first patient in 1994, the Peacock system has maintained its presence as the dominant method of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery. Currently in use at nearly 80 institutions, over 8000 patients have been treated using the system. Peacock treatments have been delivered to sites throughout the body, including CNS, head & neck, prostate, liver, kidney, lung, mediastinum, and extremities. IMRT, however, is a young and rapidly evolving treatment methodology. As institutions have explored new ways of improving radiation therapy with intensity-modulated techniques, the requirements for the Peacock system have also expanded. More sophisticated planning algorithms have been implemented to satisfy these new requirements, as well as better tools for treatment verification and quality assurance. In addition, new delivery techniques are being examined to improve the ability of IMRT to increase target volume doses while limiting organ-at-risk doses. One such technique, using helical tomotherapy (Peacock is an example of sequential tomotherapy), is currently being evaluated at one institution. Both techniques use narrow, modulated delivery beams. However, helical tomotherapy requires continuous movement of the couch during radiation, similar to helical CT. This work reviews the development of tomotherapy with the Peacock system. It then looks at current IMRT treatment techniques using tomotherapy, and how the field has broadened since the first treatments were delivered. Finally, it looks at the future of tomotherapy techniques, and how these techniques will adapt to the changing requirements for radiation therapy.