Effect of Seville orange juice and grapefruit juice on indinavir pharmacokinetics

Considerable interpatient variability in indinavir pharmacokinetics, possibly due in part to variable metabolism of the drug through intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, may contribute to poor virologic response in certain individuals with HIV infection. The purpose of this study was to characterize the influence of intestinal CYP3A4 modulation with grapefruit juice and Seville orange juice on indinavir pharmacokinetics. In an open-label, three-period crossover study, 13 healthy volunteers received indinavir 800 mg every 8 hours for 1 day and a single 800 mg dose the next morning. The last two indinavir doses were taken with 8 ounces of Seville orange juice, single-strength grapefruit juice, or water (control). Plasma samples were collected at time 0 (predose) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 hours after the last indinavir dose. Concentration-time data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods. Coadministration of Seville orange juice and indinavir resulted in a statistically significant increase in indinavir t(max) (1.87 [1.65-2.22] vs. 1.25 [1.03-1.60] h; p < 0.05) without altering other pharmacokinetic parameter values. Grapefruit juice administration did not result in any changes in indinavir pharmacokinetics. Modulation of intestinal CYP3A4 by grapefruit juice and Seville orange juice did not alter the systemic availability of indinavir. The contribution of presystemic metabolism to indinavir interpatient variability appears to be small.     

The interaction effect of grapefruit juice is maximal after the first glass

Objective: To compare the acute effect of grapefruit juice intake on the pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of felodipine ER tablets with the interaction after 14 days′ intake of drug with juice. Methods: Twelve healthy male volunteers were included in this cross-over trial and randomly allocated to a daily intake of a 10-mg felodipine extended release tablet with water or grapefruit juice for 14 days. The two study periods were separated by at least 14 days. The pharmacokinetics of felodipine and dehydrofelodipine, as well as the haemodynamic effects of the drug, were studied during day 1 and 14 in each period. Results: Similarly to previous single-dose studies, the treatment during the first day with grapefruit juice increased the AUC (+73%) and C_max (+138%) of felodipine when compared with the control treatment. On day 14 a similar effect of grapefruit juice was observed, with an increased AUC₂₄ (+57%) and C_max (+114%) of felodipine compared with the control experiment. A significant accumulation of felodipine occurred during both the control (+37%) and grapefruit juice (+25%) period. The extent of accumulation was not significantly different in the two treatment periods. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolite dehydrofelodipine were affected to a similar extent by the juice on day 1 and day␣14. The first dose of felodipine together with grapefruit juice was associated with a significant additional increase in heart rate when compared with the control therapy, whereas there was no additional effect on blood pressure when therapy included grapefruit juice. On day 14 the intake of drug with juice resulted in an additional increase in heart rate and reduction in diastolic blood pressure in comparison with the control experiment. Furthermore, the vascularly related adverse events were more frequent in the period including grapefruit juice. Conclusion: The interaction between grapefruit juice and felodipine appears to be already fully developed after the first glass of grapefruit juice, as the change in pharmacokinetics in comparison with the control experiment is similar on day 1 and on day 14. Concomitant intake of 10 mg felodipine ER and the juice is associated with increased haemodynamic effects in healthy subjects both after a single dose and following 14 days of concomitant intake. Received: 6 June 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 12 November 1997     

Grapefruit juice has no effect on quinine pharmacokinetics

Objective: As quinine is mainly metabolised by human liver CYP3A4 and grapefruit juice inhibits CYP3A4, the effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of quinine following a single oral dose of 600 mg quinine sulphate was investigated. Methods: The study was carried out in ten healthy volunteers using a randomised cross-over design. Subjects were studied on three occasions, with a washout period of 2 weeks. During each period, subjects received a pretreatment of 200 ml orange juice (control), full-strength grapefruit juice or half-strength grapefruit juice twice daily for 5 days. On day 6, the subjects were given a single oral dose of 600 mg quinine sulphate with 200 ml of one of the juices. Plasma and urine samples for measurement of quinine and its major metabolite, 3-hydroxyquinine, were collected over a 48-h period and analysed by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography method. Results: The intake of grapefruit juice did not significantly alter the oral pharmacokinetics of quinine. There were no significant differences among the three treatment periods with regard to pharmacokinetic parameters of quinine, including the peak plasma drug concentration (C_max), the time to reach C_max (t_max), the terminal elimination half-life (t_1/2), the area under the concentration–time curve and the apparent oral clearance. The pharmacokinetics of the 3-hydroxyquinine metabolite were slightly changed when volunteers received grapefruit juice. The mean C_max of the metabolite (0.25 ± 0.09 mg l⁻¹, mean ± SD) while subjects received full-strength grapefruit juice was significantly less than during the control period (0.31 ± 0.06 mg l⁻¹, P < 0.05) and during the intake of half-strength grapefruit juice (0.31 ± 0.07 mg l⁻¹, P < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that there is no significant interaction between the parent compound quinine and grapefruit juice, so it is not necessary to advise patients against ingesting grapefruit juice at the same time that they take quinine. Since quinine is a low clearance drug with a relatively high oral bioavailability, and is primarily metabolised by human liver CYP3A4, the lack of effect of grapefruit juice on quinine pharmacokinetics supports the view that the site of CYP inhibition by grapefruit juice is mainly in the gut. Received: 2 November 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 18 February 1999     

Influence of grapefruit juice on the systemic availability of itraconazole oral solution in healthy adult volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of repeated ingestion of grapefruit juice on the systemic availability of itraconazole (ITZ) and hydroxyitraconazole (OHITZ) serum concentrations in subjects administered hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin-ITZ (HP-beta-CD ITZ) oral solution. DESIGN: Randomized, two-period, crossover study. SETTING: College of pharmacy research unit. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy, adult volunteers (10 men, 10 women). INTERVENTION: Subjects received 240 ml of regular-strength grapefruit juice from frozen concentrate or bottled purified water 3 times/day for 2 days. On the third day they received a single dose of HP-beta-CD ITZ oral solution 200 mg (20 ml) with 240 ml of the beverage. Two hours after dosing they received another 240 ml of the beverage. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Repeated blood samples were drawn for 72 hours after dosing. After a 14-day washout period, subjects were crossed over to the beverage they had not received previously and the above procedure was repeated. There was no difference in peak ITZ concentration (Cmax) or time to Cmax (Tmax). Coadministration of grapefruit juice reduced OHITZ Cmax nearly 10%, but this difference was not statistically significant. It produced a statistically significant increase in ITZ area under the concentration-time curves from 0-48 hours (AUC(0-48)) (17%) and from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) (19.5%). Apparent oral clearance of ITZ was significantly reduced (14%). Significant changes in OHITZ exposure were not observed; however, grapefruit juice coadministration produced statistically significant decreased mean OHITZ:ITZ AUC(0-48) and AUC(0-infinity) ratios. Grapefruit juice also decreased the mean OHITZ:ITZ Cmax ratio, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Repeated grapefruit juice consumption moderately affects ITZ systemic availability in subjects administered HP-beta-CD ITZ oral solution. Unlike previous findings with ITZ capsules, changes in the disposition of ITZ and OHITZ after repeated grapefruit juice consumption are consistent with grapefruit juice inhibition of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4.     

Effects of repeated ingestion of grapefruit juice on the single and multiple oral-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alprazolam

The effects of repeated ingestion of grapefruit juice, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both single and multiple oral doses of alprazolam, a substrate of CYP3A4, were examined. In study 1, eight healthy volunteers ingesting 600 ml/day water or grapefruit juice for 10 days took a single oral 0.8-mg dose of alprazolam on the eighth day. Plasma drug concentrations were monitored up to 48 h after alprazolam dosing together with evaluation of psychomotor function. Grapefruit juice altered neither the plasma concentrations of alprazolam at any time points, any pharmacokinetic parameters, nor the majority of psychomotor function parameters in subjects. In study 2, 11 patients with anxiety disorders receiving alprazolam (0.8-2.4 mg/day) ingested grapefruit juice (600 ml/day) for 7 days. Blood samples were collected before and during grapefruit juice ingestion and 1 week after its discontinuation together with an assessment of clinical status. Grapefruit juice altered neither the steady-state plasma concentration of alprazolam nor the clinical status in patients. The present study shows that grapefruit juice is unlikely to affect pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of alprazolam due to its high bioavailability.     

UV-irradiated grapefruit juice loses pharmacokinetic interaction with nifedipine in rats

In the present study, UV-irradiated grapefruit juice was used to investigate the effects of UV light on nifedipine pharmacokinetics. Grapefruit juice in quartz vessels was UV irradiated (302 nm) with a transilluminator for 0 to 6 h at 4 degrees C, and furanocoumarins, potent contributors to the pharmacokinetic interaction, in each juice sample were measured using HPLC. The concentrations of all three types of furanocoumarins, bergamottin, 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin, and bergaptol, decreased in a time-dependent manner. Concentrations of bergamottin, 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin, and bergaptol were decreased to 1.66, 1.98, and 5.58%, respectively, after UV irradiation for 6 h. Two milliliters of untreated and UV-irradiated grapefruit juice were preadministered into the duodenum in rats to assess the effects of UV irradiation on nifedipine pharmacokinetics in vivo. After 30 min, nifedipine was intraduodenally administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg body weight. The nifedipine concentrations in the plasma samples were determined using HPLC. A significant increase in the area under the concentration-time curve of nifedipine was observed in untreated grapefruit juice to 1.6-fold that in the control group, but not in the UV-irradiated grapefruit juice. These findings suggest that UV irradiation is useful to eliminate pharmacokinetic interactions with grapefruit juice.     

Effects of grapefruit juice on intestinal P-glycoprotein: evaluation using digoxin in humans

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of oral digoxin, a P-glycoprotein substrate not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, in healthy volunteers, and to assess whether polymorphic multidrug-resistance-1 (MDR1) expression contributes to interindividual variability in digoxin disposition. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, unblinded, crossover study. SETTING: University research center. SUBJECTS: Seven healthy adult volunteers (four men, three women). INTERVENTION: Each subject received a single oral dose of digoxin 1.0 mg with water or grapefruit juice with at least a 2-week washout between treatments. During the grapefruit juice phase, juice was administered 3 times/day for 5 days before digoxin administration to maximize any effect on P-glycoprotein. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Digoxin pharmacokinetics in the presence and absence of grapefruit juice were compared. The MDR1 exon 26 C3435T genotype was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Compared with water, grapefruit juice significantly reduced the digoxin absorption rate constant (3.0 +/- 2.4 to 1.2 +/- 1.0 hr(-1), p<0.05) and increased absorption lag time (0.32 +/- 0.12 to 0.53 +/- 0.34 hr, p<0.05). Grapefruit juice did not affect digoxin maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC), elimination half-life, or renal clearance. The effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin Cmax (-45% to +41%) and AUC(0-4) (-29% to +25%) varied substantially among subjects and was inversely correlated with the values during the water phase. Trends toward higher digoxin Cmax AUC, and absorption rate constant during the water phase were found in CC homozygotes compared with subjects carrying a T allele. CONCLUSION: Inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein does not appear to play an important role in drug interactions involving grapefruit juice. Interindividual variability in response to grapefruit juice may be related to the balance of intestinal drug uptake and efflux transport.     

Lack of effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine

AIMS: To determine whether repeated once daily administration of grapefruit juice altered the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the calcium antagonist amlodipine. METHOD:S The effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral and intravenous amlodipine were assessed in 20 healthy men in a placebo-controlled, open, randomized, four-way crossover study using single doses of amlodipine 10 mg. For 9 days beginning with the day of administration of amlodipine, grapefruit juice (or water control) was given once daily, and blood samples, blood pressure and heart rate measures were obtained. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine and its enantiomers were determined in separate assays by GC-ECD. RESULTS: Oral amlodipine had high systemic availability (grapefruit juice: 88%; water: 81%). Pharmacokinetic parameters of racemic amlodipine (AUC, Cmax, tmax, and kel) were not markedly changed with grapefruit juice coadministration. Total plasma clearance and volume of distribution, calculated after intravenous amlodipine, were essentially unchanged by grapefruit juice (CL 6.65 ml min-1 kg-1, juice vs 6.93 ml min-1 kg-1, water; Vdss 22.7 l kg-1, juice vs 21.0 l kg-1, water). Grapefruit juice coadministration did not greatly alter the stereoselectivity in amlodipine oral or intravenous kinetics. The sum of S(-) and R(+) enantiomer concentrations correlated well with total racemic amlodipine concentration (r2 = 0. 957; P = 0.0001). Coadministration of grapefruit juice with either route of amlodipine administration did not significantly alter blood pressure changes vs control. CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice has no appreciable effect on amlodipine pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics, including its stereoselective kinetics. Bioavailability enhancement by grapefruit juice, noted with other dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, does not occur with amlodipine. Once daily grapefruit juice administration with usual oral doses of amlodipine is unlikely to alter the profile of response in clinical practice.     

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of cisapride in healthy volunteers and the effect of repeated administration of grapefruit juice

AIMS: To determine whether the pharmacokinetics of cisapride and its interaction with grapefruit juice are stereoselective. METHODS: The study was a randomized, two-phase cross over design with a washout period of 2 weeks. Ten healthy volunteers were pretreated with either water or 200 ml double strength grapefruit juice three times a day for 2 days. On the 3rd each subject ingested a single 10 mg dose of rac-cisapride tablet. Double strength grapefruit juice (200 ml) or water was administered during cisapride dosing and 0.5 and 1.5 h thereafter. Blood samples were collected before and for 32 h after cisapride administration. Plasma concentrations of cisapride enantiomers were measured by a chiral h.p.l.c. method. A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded before cisapride administration (baseline) and 2, 5, 8, and 12 h later. RESULTS: This study showed that cisapride pharmacokinetics are stereoselective. In control (water treated) subjects, the mean Cmax (30 +/- 13.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.0008) and AUC(0, infinity) (201 +/- 161 ng ml-1 h; P = 0.029) of (-)-cisapride were significantly higher than the Cmax (10.5 +/- 3.4 ng ml-1) and AUC(0, infinity) (70 +/- 51.5 ng ml-1 h) of (+)-cisapride. There was no marked difference in elimination half-life between (-)-cisapride (4.7 +/- 2.7 h) and (+)-cisapride (4.8 +/- 3 h). Compared with the water treated group, grapefruit juice significantly increased the mean Cmax of (-)-cisapride from 30 +/- 13.6-55.5 +/- 18 ng ml-1 (95% CI on mean difference, -33, -17; P = 0.00005) and of (+)-cisapride from 10.5 +/- 3.4 to 18.4 +/- 6.2 ng ml-1 (95% CI on mean difference, -11.8, -3.9, P = 0.00015). The mean AUC(0, infinity) of (-)-cisapride was increased from 201 +/- 161 to 521.6 +/- 303 ng ml-1 h (95% CI on mean difference, -439, -202; P = 0.0002) and that of (+)-cisapride from 70 +/- 51.5 to 170 +/- 91 ng ml-1 h (95% CI on mean difference, -143, -53; P = 0.0005). The tmax was also significantly increased for both enantiomers (from 1.35 to 2.8 h for (-)-cisapride and from 1.75 to 2.9 h for (+)-cisapride in the control and grapefruit juice group, respectively; P < 0.05). The t(1/2) of (-)-cisapride was significantly increased by grapefruit juice, while this change did not reach significant level for (+)-cisapride. The proportion of pharmacokinetic changes brought about by grapefruit juice was similar for both enantiomers, suggesting non-stereoselective interaction. We found no significant difference in mean QTc intervals between the water and grapefruit juice treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of cisapride is stereoselective. Grapefruit juice elevates plasma concentrations of both (-)- and (+)-cisapride, probably through inhibition of CYP3A in the intestine. At present, there are no data on whether the enantiomers exhibit stereoselective pharmacodynamic actions. If they do, determination of plasma concentrations of the individual enantiomers as opposed to those of racemic cisapride may better predict the degree of drug interaction, cardiac safety and prokinetic efficacy of cisapride.     

Absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between intravenous peramivir and oral oseltamivir or rimantadine in humans

Peramivir, an intravenously administered neuraminidase inhibitor, may be used concomitantly with other influenza antivirals. Two studies were conducted to assess the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of peramivir when coadministered with oseltamivir or rimantadine. Twenty-one healthy subjects were enrolled in each randomized, open-label, crossover study, and they received 1 intravenous dose of peramivir (600 mg), 1 oral dose of oseltamivir (75 mg) or rimantadine (100 mg), or a combination of peramivir with oseltamivir or rimantadine. Assessment of the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of peramivir and oseltamivir carboxylate or rimantadine pharmacokinetic parameters showed no effect of oseltamivir or rimantadine on the pharmacokinetics of peramivir and no effect of peramivir on the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir carboxylate or rimantadine. The drugs were well tolerated. These results suggest no reason to expect an effect of concomitant administration of oseltamivir or rimantadine on the safety profile of peramivir in patients with influenza.     

Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone and methylprednisolone and cortisol secretion in healthy subjects

AIMS: Itraconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4 activity and is often used in combination with corticosteroids. Since the latter are partly metabolized by CYP3A4, we studied the interaction between itraconazole, prednisone and methylprednisolone in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The effects of 4 days administration of oral itraconazole (400 mg on the first day then 200 mg day-1 for 3 days) on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone after a single oral dose of prednisone (60 mg) and the pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone after single oral dose of methylprednisolone (48 mg) were studied in 14 healthy male subjects in a two-period cross-over trial. Plasma cortisol concentrations were determined as a pharmacodynamic index. RESULTS: Itraconazole increased the mean area under the methylprednisolone concentration-time curve from 2773 ng ml-1 h to 7011 ng ml-1 h (P < 0.001) and the elimination half-life from 3.2 h to 5.5 h (P < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of prednisolone were unchanged. Cortisol concentrations at 24 h were lower after administration of methylprednisolone with itraconazole than after methylprednisolone alone (24 ng ml-1 vs 109 ng ml-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole increased methylprednisolone concentrations markedly with enhanced suppression of endogenous cortisol secretion, but had no effect on prednisolone pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic interaction between methylprednisolone and itraconazole is probably related to inhibition of hepatic CYP3A4 activity by itraconazole.     

A 3-way crossover study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between nateglinide and diclofenac in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To assess in healthy male volunteers (n = 18) the effect of diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic drug used for treatment of rheumatic diseases, on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide, a new oral hypoglycemic agent that acts by a novel therapeutic mechanism to stimulate insulin release. The effects of nateglinide on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac were also investigated. METHODS: This open-label study was conducted as a randomized, 3-period, 6-sequence, crossover investigation consisting of 2 reference treatment periods (diclofenac 75 mg or nateglinide 120 mg, alone) and 1 test period (concomitant nateglinide and diclofenac). On the days when nateglinide was administered, subjects received a 120 mg dose at the start of the study day and a second 120 mg dose 4 h after the first. A 2 to 7-day washout interval separated each of the study periods. Nateglinide and diclofenac plasma concentrations were determined up to 12 and 24 h, respectively. RESULTS: Administration of diclofenac did not alter the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in healthy subjects. Similarly, concurrent administration of nateglinide with diclofenac did not alter the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac in these subjects. All treatments were considered to have been both safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that concomitant administration of diclofenac with nateglinide does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic profile of either drug.     

Effect of diclofenac, disulfiram, itraconazole, grapefruit juice and erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of quinidine

AIMS: In vitro studies suggest that the oxidation of quinidine to 3-hydroxyquinidine is a specific marker reaction for CYP3A4 activity. To assess the possible use of this reaction as an in vivo marker of CYP3A4 activity, we studied the involvement of cytochromes CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 in the in vivo oxidative metabolism of quinidine. METHODS: An open study of 30 healthy young male volunteers was performed. The pharmacokinetics of a 200 mg single oral dose of quinidine was studied before and during daily administration of 100 mg diclofenac, a CYP2C9 substrate (n=6); 200 mg disulfiram, an inhibitor of CYP2E1 (n=6); 100 mg itraconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 (n=6); 250 ml single strength grapefruit juice twice daily, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 (n=6); 250 mg of erythromycin 4 times daily, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 (n=6). Probes of other enzyme activities, caffeine (CYP1A2), sparteine (CYP2D6), mephenytoin (CYP2C19), tolbutamide (CYP2C9) and cortisol (CYP3A4) were also studied. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of diclofenac reduced the partial clearance of quinidine by N-oxidation by 27%, while no effect was found for other pharmacokinetic parameters of quinidine. Concomitant administration of disulfiram did not alter any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of quinidine. Concomitant administration of itraconazole reduced quinidine total clearance, partial clearance by 3-hydroxylation and partial clearance by N-oxidation by 61, 84 and 73%, respectively. The renal clearance was reduced by 60% and the elimination half-life increased by 35%. Concomitant administration of grapefruit juice reduced the total clearance of quinidine and its partial clearance by 3-hydroxylation and N-oxidation by 15, 19 and 27%, respectively. The elimination half-life of quinidine was increased by 19%. The caffeine metabolic index was reduced by 25%. Concomitant administration of erythromycin reduced the total clearance of quinidine and its partial clearance by 3-hydroxylation and N-oxidation by 34, 50 and 33%, respectively. Cmax was increased by 39%. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm an important role for CYP3A4 in the oxidation of quinidine in vivo, and this applies particularly to the formation of 3-hydroxyquinidine. While a minor contribution of CYP2C9 to the N-oxidation of quinidine is possible, a major involvement of the CYP2C9 or CYP2E1 enzymes in the oxidation of quinidine in vivo is unlikely.     

Effects of grapefruit juice ingestion – pharmacokinetics and haemodynamics of intravenously and orally administered felodipine in healthy men

Objective: To examine the effect of grapefruit juice on the metabolism of felodipine following intravenous and oral administration. Methods: The study had a randomised, four-way, crossover design in 12 healthy males. Single doses of felodipine were given as an intravenous infusion for 1 h (1.5 mg) or as an oral extended release (ER) tablet (10 mg). Grapefruit juice (150 ml) or water was ingested 15 min prior to drug intake. Results: Intake of grapefruit juice did not significantly alter the intravenous pharmacokinetics of felodipine compared to control treatment, whereas after oral drug administration it did lead to an increase in the mean AUC and C_max by 72% and 173%, respectively, and the mean absolute bioavailability was increased by 112%. The fraction of the oral felodipine dose reaching the portal system was increased from 45% to 80% when intake of drug was preceded by grapefruit juice ingestion. The pharmacokinetics of the primary metabolite, dehydrofelodipine, was affected by the intake of juice, resulting in a 46% increase in C_max. Juice intake immediately before oral felodipine resulted in more pronounced haemodynamic effects of the drug as measured by diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. However, the haemodynamic effects of the intravenous administration were not altered by juice intake. Vascular-related adverse events were reported more frequently when oral drug administration was preceded by juice intake compared with control treatment. Taking grapefruit juice immediately prior to intravenous felodipine administration did not cause any alteration in the adverse event pattern. Conclusion: The main acute effect of the grapefruit juice on the plasma concentrations of felodipine is mediated by inhibition of gut wall metabolism. Received: 24 April 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 25 November 1996     

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole

Objective: To investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole. Methods: Eleven healthy volunteers received a single dose of oral itraconazole (200 mg) on days 1 and 15 and oral omeprazole (40 mg) once daily from day 2 to day 15. Itraconazole pharmacokinetics were studied on days 1 and 15. Results: Concentrations of itraconazole were higher when it was taken alone than when it was taken with omeprazole. With concomitant omeprazole treatment, the mean AUC_0–24 and C_max of itraconazole were significantly reduced by 64% and 66%, respectively. Conclusion: Omeprazole affects itraconazole kinetics, leading to a reduction in bioavailability and C_max. These two drugs should not be used together. Received: 12 November 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 13 January 1998     

The impact of CYP2C8 polymorphism and grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide

AIMS: The primary aim of the study was to investigate the possible effect of the CYP2C8*3 allele and of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide. Furthermore, the impact of a single dose of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in relation to dose. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy male subjects, genotyped for CYP2C8*3 (11 genotyped as CYP2C8*1/*3, one as CYP2C8*3/*3 and 24 as CYP2C8*1/*1), participated in a randomized, cross-over trial. In the two phases, the subjects drank 300 mL water or 300 mL grapefruit juice, in randomized order, 2 h before administration of a single dose of either 0.25 mg or 2 mg repaglinide. RESULTS: Neither the mean AUC(0-infinity) (geometric mean ratio: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.93-1.1, P = 0.88) nor the mean C(max) (geometric mean ratio: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94-1.2, P = 0.35) of repaglinide were statistically significantly different in the group carrying the CYP2C8*3 mutant allele compared with wild-types. Grapefruit juice caused a 19% decrease in the geometric mean ratio of the 3-hydroxyquinidine to quinidine ratio (difference: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.75-0.87, P < 0.0001), which was used as an index of CYP3A4 activity, and an increase in the mean AUC(0-infinity) of repaglinide (geometric mean ratio: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.2, P = 0.0048), but had no statistically significant effect on the t(1/2). There was no statistically significant difference in blood glucose concentration in subjects who had or had not ingested grapefruit juice. The effect was more pronounced at the low dose of repaglinide (0.25 mg) than at the therapeutic dose of 2 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in subjects carrying the CYP2C8*3 mutant allele did not differ significantly from those in the wild-types. Grapefruit juice increased the bioavailability of repaglinide, suggesting significant intestinal elimination of the drug which was assumed to be primarily mediated by CYP3A4 in the gut.     

The cardiac effects of terfenadine after inhibition of its metabolism by grapefruit juice

Objective: To determine whether the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of terfenadine are affected by the concomitant administration of grapefruit juice. Methods: Six healthy volunteers were recruited for a balanced cross-over study. Each volunteer received 120 mg terfenadine 30 min after drinking 300 ml of either water or freshly squeezed grapefruit juice. The alternative treatment was administered on the second study day 2 weeks later. Measurements of the area under the terfenadine plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum terfenadine concentration (C_max) and the time to maximum concentration (t_max) were made, and the corrected QT (QTc) interval was measured from the surface electrocardiogram. Results: Terfenadine was quantifiable in plasma in all 6 subjects on both study days for up to 24 h post-dosing. The AUC of terfenadine was significantly increased by concomitant grapefruit administration (median values 40.6 vs 16.3 ng · ml⁻¹ · h), as was the C_max (median values 7.2 vs 2.1 ng · ml⁻¹). The t_max was not significantly increased and there was no significant change in the median QTc interval despite the increased terfenadine levels. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in the change in QTc interval at C_max was −13 to +38 ms. Conclusion: Administration of grapefruit juice concomitantly with terfenadine may lead to an increase in terfenadine bioavailability, but the increase observed in this study did not lead to significant cardiotoxicity in normal subjects. However, this does not exclude the risk of cardiotoxicity in high-risk subjects given greater doses of grapefruit juice over longer periods of time. Received: 14 October 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 10 December 1996     

Grapefruit juice decreases the systemic availability of itraconazole capsules in healthy volunteers.

The systemic availability of itraconazole capsules may be reduced secondary to elevated gastric pH and possibly by presystemic intestinal metabolism via CYP3A4. Grapefruit juice is acidic and an inhibitor of intestinal CYP3A4. To determine the effect of grapefruit juice on the systemic availability of itraconazole capsules, serum itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole concentrations were determined in eleven healthy volunteers studied in a randomized, two-way crossover design. Concurrent grapefruit juice resulted in a 43% decrease in the mean itraconazole AUC0-48 (2507 ng x hr/mL versus 1434 ng x hr/mL, p = 0.046) and a 47% decrease in the mean hydroxy-itraconazole AUC0-72 (7264 ng x hr/mL versus 3880 ng x hr/mL, p = 0.025). Grapefruit juice also significantly increased the mean itraconazole Tmax (5.5 versus 4 hours). We conclude that concomitant grapefruit juice does not enhance the systemic availability of itraconazole capsules, but rather appears to impair itraconazole absorption. Therefore, concomitant grapefruit juice will not likely be useful in improving the oral availability of itraconazole capsules.     

The effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of erythromycin

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of erythromycin. METHODS: The effects of grapefruit juice intake on the pharmacokinetics of erythromycin were investigated in six healthy male volunteers, who received 400 mg erythromycin with either water or grapefruit juice. The measurement of erythromycin in plasma samples were achieved by simple Sep-Pak CN cartridge extraction coupled with the electrochemical determination HPLC method, which was developed for the determination of erythromycin in human plasma in the present study. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice, compared with water intake, significantly (P<0.05) increased the mean Cmax value (1.65+/-0.94 versus 2.51+/-0.68 microg/ml) and the mean AUC0-12 value of erythromycin (5.92+/-3.25 versus 8.80+/-1.32microg.h/ml). However, the Tmax and t1/2 values of erythromycin were not affected by grapefruit juice intake. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the bioavailability of erythromycin was increased by the inhibitory effect of grapefruit juice on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism in the small intestine.