A two-dose schedule for combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in children aged 6-15 years

A combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, Twinrix, in a paediatric formulation for ages 1-15 years and in an adult formulation for those ages 16 years and older, became commercially available in Turkey as well as in many countries. It is administered according to a three-dose schedule (0, 1 and 6 months). A reduction in the number of doses would improve the compliance rate and reduce administration costs. Therefore, we planned a trial evaluation of the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity profile of a high-dose combined hepatitis A and B vaccine, administered in two doses, compared with the profile of a paediatric-dose combined vaccine, administered in three doses, in healthy children aged 6-15 years. One hundred children were randomly attributed to the two study groups. The first group (paediatric-dose vaccine group) received the licensed Twinrix Paediatric, at months 0, 1 and 6; the second group (high-dose vaccine group) received the high-dose vaccine, following a 0, 6 months schedule. The reactogenicity was assessed after each vaccine dose. The immunogenicity was evaluated by testing for anti-HBs and anti-HAV antibodies. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were compared. Both formulations of the combined vaccine were well tolerated. The high-dose combined vaccine administered in two doses, elicits satisfactory immunogenicity profiles, similar to those elicited by the paediatric vaccine administered in three doses. On completion of the vaccination schedule in the two groups all children were protected against hepatitis B and immune for hepatitis A. Anti-HAV GMTs after completion of the vaccination schedule were 7163 mlU/ml in the paediatric-dose group, 8241 mlU/ml in the high-dose group; anti-HBs GMTs were 8679 and 4583 mlU/ml, respectively. These results indicate that a two-dose schedule, compared with the standard three-dose schedule, offers fewer injections for satisfactory protection against the two infections. This means fewer clinic visits, lower administration costs, better compliance, and higher coverage rate. Therefore, this two-dose schedule can be considered an appropriate regimen for the immunization of children and adolescents against hepatitis A and B infection, in the context of school-based immunization programmes.     

A new accelerated vaccination schedule for rapid protection against hepatitis A and B.

BACKGROUND: Increasing travel stresses the requirement for rapid protection against infections such as hepatitis A and B. METHODS: This randomised, multicentre study investigated an accelerated vaccination schedule using a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix, Smithkline Beecham Biologicals) compared with simultaneous administration of the two corresponding monovalent vaccines. The combined vaccine was administered on days 0, 7 and 21, whereas the comparison group received hepatitis A vaccine on day 0 and hepatitis B vaccine on days 0, 7 and 21. All subjects received booster vaccination at month 12. RESULTS: At month 1, 100% of subjects in the combined group and 99% of the controls were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. The corresponding seroprotection rates for anti-HBs antibodies were 82.0 and 83.9%, respectively. Examination of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment differences showed the two vaccines to be equivalent in terms of immunogenicity 1 week after the initial vaccination course. Just prior to the booster, the seropositivity rate for anti-HAV was 96.2% in the combined group and 95% in the control group. For anti-HBs, this was 94 and 91.6%, respectively. All subjects were seropositive for anti-HAV and seroprotected against hepatitis B at month 13. The anti-HAV GMCs were 9571mIU/ml with the combined vaccine and 5206mIU/ml in control subjects. The anti-HBs titre was 26002 and 29,196mIU/ml, respectively. Both groups had a similar reactogenicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: The accelerated schedule of the combined vaccine provides a good immune response against hepatitis A and B antigens and is suitable for last minute immunisation.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined high dose hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine, compared to that of Twinrix in healthy Indian children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are vaccine preventable important childhood acquired infectious diseases in developing countries. In the changing epidemiology of HAV, the utility of such a vaccine in India needs urgent attention. Further, the efficacy of two versus three dose schedule needs to be assessed to improve compliance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred healthy school children, aged 1-15 years were recruited in a randomised open study to receive either vaccination schedule: Group I: combined high-dose hepatitis A and B vaccine to be administered on a 0, 6 month schedule intramuscularly; Group II: to be administered on 0, 1, 6 month Twinrix (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) schedule intramuscularly. The seroconversion (> or =1MIU/ml for anti-HBs antibodies and > or =33MIU/ml for anti-HAV antibodies) and seroprotection (anti-HBs > or =10MIU/ml after the third dose of vaccine) rates were determined at months 1, 2, and 7. RESULTS: The mean age and gender was similar between groups: 7.9+/-2.6 years (range 3-15 years). At month 7 all subjects (100%) in both groups were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies, Group I had higher anti-HAV titres at months 1 or 2 compared to Group II (P=0.025, P=0.040). Group II developed higher seroprotection rates (month 2, P=0.002, month 6, P=0.003) compared to Group I and higher titres (month 2, P=0.001, month 6 P=0.001) compared to Group I. At month 7, the geometric mean titres (GMTs) were comparable between groups and seroprotection reached 100% in both the groups. The incidence of any symptom per dose analysis reported during a 4-day follow-up period was significantly higher in Group I, 53% (52/98) of the documented doses compared to 37% (54/146) in Group II (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Twinrix vaccine is safe and highly immunogenic in Indian children. Further study of the high dose vaccine would determine if its two dose regimen is a feasible advantage.     

Comparative immunogenicity and safety of two dosing schedules of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in healthy adolescent volunteers: an open, randomised study

An open, randomised study was undertaken to demonstrate the equivalence in immunogenicity and to determine the reactogenicity and safety of two dosing schedules (0, 6 or 0, 12 month) of an adult formulation of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine containing 720 EL.U. of inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 μg of hepatitis B surface antigen (Twinrix™, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Belgium) in 240 healthy volunteers aged 12–15 years. The vaccine was well tolerated when administered using either vaccination schedule. At month 7, 98.1% of subjects completing the 0, 6 month vaccination schedule were seroprotected against hepatitis B (anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs)10 mIU/ml) and 100% were seropositive for anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) antibodies (i.e., 33 mIU/ml). The corresponding geometric mean titres (GMTs) were 2791 mIU/ml for anti-HBs and 5992 mIU/ml for anti-HAV antibodies. At month 13, 97% of subjects assigned to the 0, 12 month vaccination schedule were protected against hepatitis B and 99% were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. The corresponding GMTs were 4340 and 8472 mIU/ml, respectively. A combined response (i.e., subjects, who were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies and seroprotected for anti-HBs antibodies) was achieved in 98% of subjects vaccinated according to the 0, 6 month interval and in 96% of subjects vaccinated using the 0, 12 month schedule. The reactogenicity of both vaccination schedules was also equivalent. The results thus show that the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine can be administered using flexible vaccination intervals, which make it suitable for use in large-scale hepatitis immunisation programmes.     

倍尔来福TM甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗安全性和免疫原性研究

目的 观察倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙型肝炎(甲、乙肝)联合疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。方法以高中一年级(成人组)和小学1～5年级(儿童组)学生为研究对象,按对甲、乙肝病毒均易感、只对甲肝病毒易感和只对乙肝病毒易感分为AB组、A组和B组,按0、1和6个月三剂程序分别接种甲、乙肝联合疫苗、灭活甲肝疫苗和重组乙肝疫苗。疫苗剂量成人组每剂含甲肝病毒抗原500U和(或)HBsAg10μg,儿童组减半。疫苗接种后72h内观察副反应,免疫后2、7个月采集血清标本检测抗-HAV和抗-HBs。结果 儿童AB组和成人AB组局部副反应发生率分别为0.58％(2/344)和2.56％(8/312),全身副反应发生率分别为9.88％(34/344)和5.45％(17/212),与对照组相比差异无显著性。局部反应主要是轻度疼痛,全身反应主要是低热。免疫后7个月,两组抗-HAV阳转率均为100％,与A组相同;抗体滴度(GMT)分别为33 910mIU/ml和23 435 mIU/ml,显著高于A组;两组抗-HBs阳转率分别为97.30％和96.63％;GMT为103 mIU/ml和102 mIU/ml,抗-HBs阳转率及GMT均与B组差异无显著性。结论 倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙肝联合疫苗与单价甲肝灭活疫苗和单价重组乙肝疫苗具有相同的安全性和免疫原性。     

The first combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B: an overview

Hepatitis A and B infections are prevalent world-wide and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. A vaccine providing dual protection against hepatitis A and B is now available (Twinrix, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals). Six pivotal vaccine trials, involving 843 healthy adults, aged between 17 and 60 years and vaccinated following a 0, 1, 6 month schedule are discussed. At month 2 more than 99% of the vaccinees were seropositive for anti-HAV and 84% were protected against hepatitis B. The third dose induced a 12-fold increase in geometric mean titres (GMTs) to 5404 mIU/ml. One month after completion of the vaccination course nearly all vaccinees had protective titres against hepatitis B with a GMT of 4818 mIU/ml. Long term follow-up data until month 48 is available for two studies. At month 48 all 129 vaccinees sampled were still positive for anti-HAV antibodies and > 95% were still protected against hepatitis B. The combined hepatitis A and B vaccine Twinrix proves to be consistently safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic and compares well with serological responses reached with monovalent vaccines. This combined hepatitis A and B vaccine offers more convenience, potentially better compliance and lower administration costs.     

甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗在儿童中0、6月程序接种的安全性和免疫原性研究

目的 观察和评价在儿童中接种2剂倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙型肝炎(分别简称为甲肝、乙肝)联合疫苗的安全性及免疫原性.方法 本研究以江苏省常州市116名1～10岁完成乙肝疫苗全程免疫同时无甲肝疫苗接种史的抗甲肝病毒抗体(anti-hepatitis A virus,抗-HAV)阴性儿童为研究对象,按0、6个月程序接种甲、乙肝联合疫苗(倍尔来福~(TM)).每剂疫苗0.5 ml,含HAV抗原250 U和乙肝表面抗原5μg.观察接种疫苗后72 h内局部反应和全身反应,检测免疫后1、6、7个月的血清抗-HAV阳转率、乙肝病毒表面抗体(抗-HBs)保护率及抗体滴度.结果 倍尔来福~(TM)接种后局部和全身不良反应发生率分别为12.1%(14/116)和6.0%(7/116),其中局部不良反应以注射部位红、肿、硬结为主,占6.9%(8/116)～11.2%(13/116),全身不良反应发生率为6.0%(7/116),以发热为主.免疫后1、6、7个月,抗.HAV阳转率为92.9%(92/99)～100.0%(101/101),抗体几何平均滴度(GMT)为47.0～2762.3 mIU/ml;疫苗免疫前抗-HBs阳性保护率为86.1%(87/101),免疫后1个月达到100.0%(101/101),免疫后1、6、7个月抗-HBs GMT为894.3～3314.3 mlU/ml.结论 倍尔来福~(TM)甲、乙肝联合疫苗2剂接种程序在乙肝基础免疫儿童中应用具有良好的安全性和免疫原性.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in young adults

The combination of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccinations can offer convenience, increased compliance and cost saving. We have studied the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in young adults (16-35 years old). Eighty healthy young adults were divided into two random groups. One group received the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (HAB) in one arm while the other group was administered concomitant hepatitis A and B vaccines (HAV + HBV) in the right and left arms, respectively. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety were assessed after each dose in both the groups. In local symptoms, the percentage of the combined HAB group was lower than the HAV + HBV group, and the general symptoms were noted in approximately 30% of each group without any significant difference. No serious adverse effects were noted. All the subjects were seropositive for antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) after one dose of vaccine, and remained seropositive after three doses in both groups. The seropositive rate for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) was significantly higher (84%) in the combined HAB group than the concomitant HAV + HBV group (62%), (p<0.05) after dose two, and all the subjects were seropositive (100%) after the third dose. The GMTs of anti-HAV and anti-HBs were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (p>0.1) except in month 6 when the GMT of anti-HBs was higher in HAB group (p=0.0039). The combined HAB vaccine was found to be safe, well tolerated and had less local symptoms in young adults. The immunogenicity and reactogenicity were similar to the concomitant HAV + HBV vaccines.     

Immunogenicity of two paediatric doses of monovalent hepatitis B or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in 8-10-year-old children

Hepatitis A and B vaccines are highly immunogenic in three-dose schedules. To obtain an equivalent result in children with two paediatric doses would be of significant benefit. The purpose of this study was to measure the immunogenicity of a two-dose schedule in children with two licensed recombinant HBsAg containing vaccines given at paediatric doses, one of them combined with hepatitis A. Seven-hundred and four healthy school children aged 8-10 years were recruited in an open label study to receive either Twinrix Pediatric (360 El.U HAV antigen; 10 microg HBsAg) or Recombivax (2.5 microg HBsAg) vaccine intramuscularly 6 months apart. The seroconversion (>/=1 mIU/ml for anti-HBs antibodies and >/=33 mIU/ml for anti-HAV antibodies), seroprotection (anti-HBs >/=10 mIU/ml) rates and the geometric mean titers (GMTs) were determined 4-8 weeks after the second dose. The anti-HBs seroconversion rate was 97.1% with Twinrix and 97.2% with Recombivax. The seroprotection rates were 96.5 and 94.4%, respectively (P = 0.17). The GMT was higher with Twinrix than with Recombivax (3248 mIU/ml versus 742 mIU/ml, P < 0.0001). All the children vaccinated with Twinrix seroconverted to HAV and the GMT was 5168 mIU/ml. The obtained results suggest that two paediatric doses of hepatitis vaccines are highly immunogenic in 8-10-year-old children. This schedule could facilitate a greater vaccine acceptance and the addition of hepatitis A vaccine to existing adolescent universal hepatitis B virus immunization programs.     

A prospective, randomized, comparative US trial of a combination hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix) with corresponding monovalent vaccines (Havrix and Engerix-B) in adults

In an open, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in the US, 773 adults were administered either a combination hepatitis vaccine (Twinrix: 720 EL.U inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 mcg recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen per milliliter) on a 0, 1, 6 month schedule or corresponding monovalent vaccines concurrently (Havrix, 1440 EL.U/ml of hepatitis A antigen at 0, 6 months and Engerix-B, 20 mcg of hepatitis B surface antigen at 0, 1, 6 months). Non-inferiority testing for the primary endpoint, severe soreness, and equivalence testing for the secondary endpoints, anti-HAV seroconversion and anti-HBs seroprotection, showed that safety and immunogenicity were comparable in the two groups.     

Antibody persistence six years after two doses of combined hepatitis A and B vaccine

Persistent immunity to hepatitis A and hepatitis B antibodies six years after vaccination of adolescents (aged 12–15 years) with a combined hepatitis A and B (HAB) vaccine following a 0, 6 month or a 0, 12 month schedule was assessed. Yearly (Year-2–6) serum samples were tested for anti-HAV and anti-HBs using EIA. Subjects with anti-HBs concentrations <10 mIU/mL (14/23) at Year-5 or Year-6, received an additional HBV vaccine dose ∼12 months after Year-6. Blood samples were collected pre-booster and 1 month post-booster to assess booster response. 240 subjects were vaccinated in the study; at Year-6, data were available from 88 subjects. At that time 84.8% (39/46; 0, 6 month) and 92.9% (39/42; 0, 12 month) of subjects had anti-HBs concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL. All but one of the 14 boosted subjects responded to the additional HBV vaccine dose with anti-HBs concentrations ≥100 mIU/mL. All seroconverted subjects who returned at Year-6 were seropositive for anti-HAV. Simplification, reduced number of doses and similar long-term persistence of immunity make the 0, 6 month and 0, 12 month schedule preferable for immunization against HAV/HBV in this population.     

Hepatitis A/B vaccination of adults over 40 years old: comparison of three vaccine regimens and effect of influencing factors

Challenged by contrasting data on low immune responses in the elderly with a combined hepatitis A/B vaccine, a randomised, controlled study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity of three hepatitis A and B vaccination regimens (group 1: combined hepatitis A/B vaccine Twinrix [GSK]; group 2: co-administered hepatitis A vaccine, Havrix [GSK]+hepatitis B vaccine Engerix -B [GSK], group 3: co-administered hepatitis A vaccine, Vaqta [Sanofi-Pasteur MSD]+hepatitis B vaccine HB VAX PRO [Sanofi-Pasteur MSD]) and the effect of influencing factors in subjects >40 years. On completion of the full vaccination course, anti-HBs seroprotection (SP) rates were 92, 80 and 71% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; anti-HAV seropositivity (S+) rates were 97, 99 and 99%, respectively. In group 1, anti-HBs SP rate was non-inferior as well as superior and anti-HAV S+ rate was non-inferior to that in groups 2 and 3. Anti-HBs response was most significantly influenced by the vaccine regimen, followed by age, gender and BMI (stepwise multiple regression analysis). BMI had the most significant influence on HAV response followed by age, gender and vaccine regimen. In conclusion, Twinrix induced superior hepatitis B SP rates and similar hepatitis A S+ rates compared to concomitant administration of monovalent vaccines in subjects aged >40 years.     

新兵接种甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗安全性和2年免疫效果评价

目的评价新兵接种甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗安全性和2年免疫效果。方法300名符合条件新兵分为A组、B组和AB组,均按0、1、6个月免疫程序分别接种单价甲肝疫苗,单价乙肝疫苗和甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗。观察首次免疫后7个月和24个月的免疫效果。结果AB组局部副反应发生率和全身副反应发生率分别为11.8%和9.1%,与对照组相比差异无显著性,局部副反应主要是接种部位的疼痛,全身副反应主要是低热。AB组和A组的抗-HAV阳性率在7个月和24个月时均为100%,AB组抗-HAV几何平均滴度(GMT)在7个月和24个月时均高于A组(P<0.05)。AB组抗-HBs阳性率和几何平均滴度(GMT)在7个月和24个月时均高于B组,但差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论新兵接种甲、乙型肝炎联合疫苗与单价甲肝疫苗和单价乙肝疫苗相比有相同的安全性,而且在首次免疫后7个月和24个月时点具有较高的免疫原性。     

Antibody persistence and immune memory elicited by combined hepatitis A and B vaccination in older adults

Response to hepatitis A and B vaccines has been reported to decline with age. This open, prospective, single-site study examined the long-term response to the combined hepatitis A/B vaccine Twinrix in 98 primary responders aged 45-67 years. Levels of antibody against hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs) were tested 30 months after initial vaccination. At this stage, all participants remained seropositive for anti-HAV and 70% for anti-HBs. A booster vaccination was offered to those who had responded to the first vaccination but then lost protective levels of anti-HBs. An anamnestic response was observed in all cases.     

Long term (24 months) follow-up of a hepatitis A and B vaccine,comparing a two and three dose schedule in adolescents aged 12-15 years

BACKGROUND: A two dose schedule (0 and 6 months) for a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine is currently being developed. METHODS: The present study compared the combined hepatitis A and B vaccines in 12-15-year-old: Twinrix paediatric (360 EL.U HAV antigen/10 microg HBs antigen) on a three dose schedule (0, 1 and 6 months) to the adult formulation (720 EL.U HAV antigen/20 microg HBs antigen) on a two dose schedule (0 and 6 months) and also reports on the follow-up until 24 months. RESULTS: Seroconversion (SC) rates to HAV in both regimens reached 100% by month 7 and remained 100% up to month 24. Anti-HAV, GMTs were slightly higher for the two dose than the three dose regimens at this time point. Seroprotection against hepatitis B was >99% in both groups by month 7 and 24, this was still 94 and 96%, respectively. Statistical non-inferiority of group 1 (two dose) versus group 2 (three dose) was demonstrated. All vaccines were well tolerated and the most frequently reported local and general symptoms were pain and fatigue. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported during the study. CONCLUSION: The two dose regimen elicited similar immunogenicity to HAV and HBsAg and reactogenicity profiles as the three dose regimen in this group of healthy adolescents. The reduction in the number of doses from the current three dose schedule will make vaccination against hepatitis A and B more convenient to the vaccinee, reduce healthcare staff time required and may lower the overall costs associated with vaccination.     

Long-term (5-year) antibody persistence following two- and three-dose regimens of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in children aged 1–11 years

This study compared the long-term persistence of anti-hepatitis A (anti-HAV) and B (anti-HBs) antibodies, 5 years after vaccination of subjects aged 1–11 years with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine either in a two-dose (0, 6 months, Adult formulation) or a three-dose (0, 1, 6 months, Paediatric formulation) schedule. At the end of the 5 years, all subjects (100%) in both groups continued to have anti-HAV antibodies ≥15 mIU/mL, while 94–97% of subjects in both groups had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL. Subjects with anti-HBs antibody concentration ≤10 mIU/mL were administered a challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine. All subjects mounted a vigorous immune response to the challenge indicating the presence of immunological memory to HBV.     

Long-term antibody persistence induced by a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in children and adolescents

Two cohorts, comprising of subjects aged 1-6 years and 6-15 years were vaccinated with Twinrix according to a 0-, 1- and 6-month schedule. The 1-6 years cohort was followed up for 7.5 years and the 6-15 years cohort for 10 years. At the latest follow-up time point, all subjects were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies, while 86.5% (32/37) and 95.5% (21/22) had anti-HBs >or= 10 mIU/ml in the 1-6 years and in the 6-15 years cohort. The geometric mean concentrations (GMCs; mIU/ml) were 233 and 680 for anti-HAV antibodies, and 147 and 165 for anti-HBs antibodies, in the 1-6 years and 6-15 years cohorts, respectively. The high persistence of circulating anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies in children and adolescents demonstrates the long-term protection offered by Twinrix in these age groups.     

Comparison of long-term (10 years) immunogenicity of two- and three-dose regimens of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in adolescents

300 adolescents aged 12–15 years were randomised (1:1) into two groups to compare the long-term (10 years) immunogenicity profile of two doses of an Adult formulation [Group HAB_2D: 150; 0–6 months] vs. three doses of a Paediatric formulation [Group HAB_3D: 150; 0–1–6 months] of a combined hepatitis A and B (HAB) vaccine. At Year 10, anti-HAV seropositivity rate was 100% in both groups, while 85.9% and 85.1% subjects in the HAB_2D and HAB_3D groups, respectively, had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL. The anti-HAV antibody GMCs (HAB_2D: 429.3 mIU/mL; HAB_3D: 335.5 mIU/mL) and anti-HBs antibody GMCs (HAB_2D: 50.6 mIU/mL; HAB_3D: 60.1 mIU/mL) were similar in both groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Hence, with respect to long-term antibody persistence, the two-dose schedule of the combined HAB vaccine Adult formulation is an effective alternative to the conventional three-dose schedule of the Paediatric formulation in adolescents.     

Comparison of immunogenicity of two hepatitis A vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--in young adults.

Two new hepatitis A vaccines have been developed, and their immunogenicity tested using different immunoassays. The present study was designed to compare the immunogenicity of these two hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--as determined by seroconversion rates and anti-HAV titers, and using the same immunoassay. Healthy volunteers (15-30 y), seronegative for anti-HAV, were randomized in an open single center study to four groups of 20-21 vaccinees each, to receive either a 25 U or a 50 U dose of VAQTA, or HAVRIX at 720 EU or 1440 EU/dose, administered at 0, 1 and 6 m or at 0 and 6 m, respectively. Four weeks after primary immunization, seroconversion rates were 100% for VAQTA and 95% for HAVRIX, following injection of 50 U or 1440 EU, respectively (p = NS) and anti-HAV GMTs were 40 and 37 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively. At 6 months, prior to the booster dose, seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, with anti-HAV GMTs of 111 and 70 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < 0.05). At month 7, four weeks after the only booster injection, using the two dose regimen, anti-HAV titers were 2212 and 1511 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < NS). Using three doses of 25 U/dose of VAQTA or 720 EU/dose of HAVRIX at 0, 1 and 6 m did not produce any clinically evaluable advantage over the two dose regimen for either vaccine. No significant adverse events were observed using either vaccine. In summary, both vaccines have similar immunogenicity demonstrated using identical immunoassays for evaluation. These results also confirm the outstanding immunogenicity of a single dose of either of the HAV vaccines and support their use in pre- and possibly postexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A virus infection.     

Antibody-response to three recombinant hepatitis B vaccines: comparative evaluation of multicenter travel-clinic based experience

The immunogenicity of three currently used hepatitis B vaccines was compared in an unselected study population in an every day travel clinical setting. Five hundred and eighteen vaccinees received Engerix-B (EB), 990 received Twinrix (TWX), and 366 were immunised with Gen-HB-Vax (GHB). Overall, 88.6% of the vaccinees, tested within the first 6 months after completion of the vaccination series, developed protective levels of anti-HBs (> or = 10 mIU/ml). However, GHB recipients showed significantly lower seroprotection rates (SPR) than EB and TWX recipients (79.3% vs. 87.7% vs. 92.3%, P < 0.000001). GMTs for anti-HBs, tested within 6 months after the third vaccination, showed the lowest results in the GHB group, followed by EB and TWX (142 vs. 523 vs. 1008 mIU/ml, P < 0.000001). TWX vaccinees, however, showing a higher antibody decline rate than EB recipients within the first years after completion of the full immunisation course (30% vs. 25%; P = 0.0538). This study confirms an overall good immune response to the 20 microg-dose vaccine, in the course of a regular clinical setting. The significant difference in SPRs and GMTs to the 10 microg-dose vaccine, however, may influence future immunisation practices for the elderly.