个体化免疫抑制治疗在肾移植的疗效观察

目的：探讨个体化免疫抑制治疗对肾移植患者的临床价值。方法：将肾移植患者分为个体化组(42例)和常规组(50例),分别采用个体化免疫抑制治疗和常规免疫抑制治疗,并对术后两组的临床指标进行比较。结果：个体化组比较常规组,术后肝功能损害、高血糖、胃肠功能紊乱、呼吸系统感染、急性排斥反应发生率均明显降低(P＜0．05);而巨细胞病毒感染发生率及移植肾切除人数无差异(P＞0．05)。结论：个体化免疫抑制治疗既能维持免疫抑制效果,又能最大限度减少药物不良反应,对肾移植患者有较好治疗价值。     

Drug insight: maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, in part because of ongoing efforts towards improving immunosuppressive strategies. Although calcineurin inhibitors remain the mainstay of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients, within this class of drug there has been a shift from use of ciclosporin to use of tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil and mycophenolate sodium are now the antimetabolites of choice. A new class of drugs (inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin) that includes sirolimus is being increasingly used in stable kidney transplant recipients. New data, however, indicate that a more cautious approach to the use of this drug is warranted. Many transplant centers are now using steroid avoidance, minimization and withdrawal protocols. The impact of these different drugs and therapeutic strategies on outcomes has to be weighed against their immunosuppressive benefit. As more and more community-based nephrologists and primary care physicians are becoming involved in the care of stable kidney transplant recipients, it is important for these clinicians to familiarize themselves with novel immunosuppressive drugs and their pharmacokinetic properties.     

Challenging immunosuppression treatment in lung transplant recipients with kidney failure

Kidney failure after lung transplantation is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitors are immunosuppressants which play a major role in terms of postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. We report our preliminary experience with the anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody Basiliximab utilized as a “calcineurin inhibitor-free window” in the setting of early postoperative kidney failure after lung transplantation. Between 2012 and 2015 nine lung transplant patients who developed kidney failure for more than 14 days were included. Basiliximab was administrated in three doses (Day 0, 4, and 20) whilst Tacrolimus was discontinued or reduced to maintain a serum level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. Baseline glomerular filtration rate pre transplant was normal for all patients. Seven patients completely recovered from kidney failure (67%, mean eGFR pre and post Basiliximab: 42.3 mL/min/1.73 m² and 69 mL/min/1.73 m²) and were switched back on Tacrolimus. Only one of these patients still needs ongoing renal replacement therapy. Two patients showed no recovery from kidney failure and did not survive. Basiliximab might be a safe and feasible therapeutical option in patients which are affected by calcineurin inhibitor-related kidney failure in the early post lung transplant period. Further studies are necessary to confirm our preliminary results.     

Conversion to belatacept maintenance immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

There are only scattered case reports documenting belatacept use in HIV + kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review to describe short-term outcomes following conversion to belatacept in a cohort of HIV + patients. Patients were included if they were converted to belatacept between May 2015 and May 2019, had an HIV- donor, and received ≥4 doses of belatacept. All patients were treated with non-depleting induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Allograft and HIV-related outcomes were collected from the date of belatacept infusion until May 2020. Ten HIV + kidney transplant recipients were identified, who were converted to belatacept a median of 364 days post-transplant. At last follow-up (median 3.3 years), 8 patients remained on belatacept therapy, and all patients were alive with functioning allografts. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) improved from 31.6 mL/min at baseline to 42.8 mL/min at 1 year (P = .03). Two patients developed acute rejection, with one necessitating conversion back to tacrolimus. All patients maintained undetectable HIV-1 viral loads at last follow-up. One patient each developed pneumocystis pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma following conversion, which were responsive to standard medical therapy. In our cohort of stable HIV + kidney transplant recipients, conversion to belatacept was associated with excellent early patient and allograft survival and improved eGFR at 1 year.     

Prednisone‐free maintenance immunosuppression in obese kidney transplant recipients

Obese transplant recipients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) have decreased posttransplant patient and graft survival compared with their nonobese counterparts. At the same time, many prednisone‐related side effects (eg, new‐onset diabetes) are similar to those associated with obesity. Using SRTR data, we studied outcomes associated with prednisone‐free maintenance immunosuppression (rapid discontinuation of prednisone—RDP). Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, 44 635 first transplant recipients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² had a first kidney transplant (28 176 DD; 16 459, LD); 12,994 (29%) were discharged from the hospital on a prednisone‐free protocol. We compared outcomes to those discharged on a protocol incorporating maintenance prednisone (intention‐to‐treat analysis). RDP‐treated obese first DD recipients had significantly better patient survival (HR, 0.88; CI, 0.81‐0.96) and graft survival (HR, 0.93; CI, 0.88‐0.99) compared with their counterparts on maintenance immunosuppression. Although not statistically significant, the same trends were seen for LD recipients. For both DD and LD recipients, there was no difference between groups for death‐censored graft survival, suggesting that the benefit of RDP was due to improved patient survival. Our findings suggest that kidney transplant recipients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² benefit from a protocol that incorporates RDP.     

Steroid avoidance with early intensified dosing of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a randomized multicentre trial in kidney transplant recipients

Background Short-term intensified dosing using enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) reduces rejection after kidney transplantation without compromising safety and may facilitate steroid avoidance. Methods In a 6-month, multicentre open-label trial, 222 de novo kidney transplant recipients at low-immunological risk were randomized to steroid avoidance or maintenance steroids with interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody (IL-2RA) induction, EC-MPS (2160 mg/day to Week 6, 1440 mg/day thereafter) and cyclosporine. Results The primary end point; treatment failure at Month 6 [biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up], occurred in 17.9% (20/112) of steroid-avoidance patients and 14.5% (16/110) of controls (difference 3.4%, 95% confidence interval -6.3 to 13.1, P = 0.47 for superiority testing). BPAR occurred in 11.6 and 7.3% of patients in the steroid-avoidance and control arms, respectively (P = 0.27). Creatinine clearance was similar at Month 6 (steroid-avoidance 56 ± 18 mL/min/1.73m(2), controls 60 ± 22 mL/min/1.73m(2), P = 0.34). Cytomegalovirus infection, as reported by investigators, occurred in 12.5% of steroid-avoidance patients and 22.7% of controls (P = 0.045). Conclusions A regimen of early intensified EC-MPS dosing with calcineurin inhibitor and IL-2RA induction permits oral steroid avoidance in adult kidney transplant patients at low-immunological risk without compromising efficacy at 6 months' follow-up.     

Steroid withdrawal for pancreas after kidney transplantation in recipients on maintenance prednisone immunosuppression

Steroid withdrawal from patients taking prednisone for their renal allograft at the time of reinduction of immunosuppression for subsequent pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation has not been explored. Our expectation was that lymphocyte depletion, in conjunction with an augmentation of immunosuppression at the time of pancreas transplantation would protect the recipient from rejection of the renal allograft when chronic maintenance steroids are withdrawn. METHODS: Pancreas transplantation was performed using systemic venous drainage and enteric exocrine drainage. Regardless of preoperative immunosuppression, all patients received induction with antithymocyte globulin, a brief taper of intravenous solumedrol over four to five days, maintenance therapy with tacrolimus and sirolimus and either resumption of chronic maintenance steroids or complete withdrawal of steroids. RESULTS: A total of 30 PAK transplants were performed in 29 recipients and divided into two groups: continuation of chronic steroids (n = 10) or steroid-free (n = 19). One pancreas allograft was lost and there was a single mortality in the steroid free group. There was no significant difference in renal function or incidence of infections. CONCLUSION: Steroids can be safely withdrawn following pancreas after kidney transplantation for recipients already on maintenance prednisone in the setting of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and tacrolimus and sirolimus maintenance immunosuppression.     

Steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients

The clinically important side effects of long-term steroid use are well known. We report the results of complete steroid withdrawal in 7 living-related renal transplants in HLA-identical (3) or one-haplotype match (4) recipients initially treated with azathioprine (5) or cyclosporine (2), and steroids. After the end of the second year, steroids were stopped if renal function was normal (serum creatinine below 2.0 mg/dl) and if no alterations were seen on renal biopsy. In 1 patient steroid had to be discontinued because of the complications of steroid immunosuppression. The study population consisted of 7 patients with a mean age of 32.4 years. The sex distribution was 6 males and 1 female. All patients had received a minimum of 3 blood transfusions prior to transplantation. Steroid was discontinued 34.0 +/- 18.1 months posttransplant. Oral azathioprine or cyclosporine were employed for long-term maintenance immunosuppression. Six patients (86%) have remained continuously off steroids for 52.2 +/- 50.5 months (range 4-150) with stable renal function. The mean serum creatinine was 1.1 +/- 0.4 mg/dl at the most recent follow-up. Reinstitution of steroid was required in 1 patient (14%) for rejection (36 months after steroid withdrawal). Thus, steroid withdrawal was successful in 6 of 7 patients. In HLA-identical recipients, all are currently steroid-free. In haplo-matched patients, 75% are steroid independent. Discontinuation of steroid resulted in a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration from 246 +/- 41 to 204 +/- 25 mg/dl (P less than 0.003). We conclude that steroid withdrawal may be accomplished in selected patient without increasing the rate of graft loss.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Steroid withdrawal in liver transplant recipients

Because of troublesome side effects associated with steroid use, many transplant centers have tried to withdraw steroids from stable, solid organ transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability to wean liver transplant recipients off steroids, depending on both their primary immunosuppressive regimen and their primary disease state. This was a retrospective, single-center review of steroid weaning in adult orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Based on primary immunosuppression, patients could be weaned off steroids similarly if they were taking cyclosporine or tacrolimus (53.9% vs 61.4%). When triple immunosuppressive regimens were compared with dual regimens, a difference was found in ability to wean patients off steroids (52.4% vs 74.5%, P = .001). When steroid weaning was stratified for primary immunosuppression and primary disease state, patients with autoimmune-mediated diseases (autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis) were less likely to be weaned if they were receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppressants (36.8% vs 62.2%, P = .03). In conclusion, it appears that a large number of liver transplant recipients can safely be tapered off steroids.     

Steroid withdrawal in lung transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Many of the long-term complications in lung transplantations are secondary effects of immunosuppression. Corticosteroids are partially responsible for the development of osteoporosis, raised blood pressure, diabetes, muscular disorders, gastric ulcers, and other conditions. We analyzed the long-term result of steroid withdrawal in our lung transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: When respiratory function stabilized, to avoid secondary effects, steroid treatment was withdrawn in 34 of the 375 lung transplant patients in our centers We evaluated the characteristics of the donors and recipients, their compatibility, the pre, and post-steroid withdrawal complications, and type of immunosuppressant. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 42 +/- 7 years and of donors, 25 +/- 9 years. The primary diseases were: 15 emphysema, six pulmonary fibrosis, 10 cystic fibrosis, and three primary pulmonary hypertension. Twenty seven patients had double lung transplants and seven single lung. The mean steroid withdrawal period was 881 +/- 237 days posttransplantation. The most frequent treatment regimen at the time of steroid withdrawal was cyclosporine, azathioprine, and minimal steroid doses. Six recipients had to be restarted on steroids one patient who required a kidney transplant, three cases due to an infectious process with a differential diagnosis of rejection, and two cases due to loss of FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), suggestive of chronic rejection. There was an improvement in blood pressure in five patients, in plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels in eight patients, and insulin withdrawal in two diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid treatment may be suspended 2 to 3 years, posttransplant in selected lung transplant recipients. The usual patient profile shows few rejection episodes with cyclosporine and azathioprine immunosuppression. What is notable is the low mean age of donors. Close clinical monitoring and lung function testing are of major importance in the weeks following steroid withdrawal.     

Steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of steroid withdrawal have been carried out in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but only a few in pancreas transplant recipients. Yet, pancreas transplant recipients could have significant long-term benefits from steroid withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the feasibility of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients. RESULTS: Of 360 recipients who underwent a pancreas transplant between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1998, 14 attempted steroid withdrawal (12 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]; 2 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Reasons for steroid withdrawal were bone fractures (n = 3), psychiatric disorders (n = 2), severe acne (n = 1), recurrent infections (n = 4), and problems with hypercholesterolemia or hypertension (n = 4). All 14 were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, except for 1 who was on tacrolimus and azathioprine (AZA). Of the 14 recipients, 11 had no episodes of acute rejection before steroid withdrawal. The remaining 3 had one or more acute rejection episodes. Of the 14 recipients, 10 (72%) currently remain off steroids (mean follow-up 18 months, range 5-51 months). However, 4 recipients have resumed steroids: 2 after an acute rejection episode (at 2 and 21 months post-withdrawal) and 2 because of leukopenia (WBC < 3000) and an inability to tolerate full-dose MMF. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in both PTA recipients and in 2 of the 12 SPK recipients. All 14 recipients currently have a functioning pancreas graft. However, 1 of the SPK recipients, in whom steroid withdrawal failed, has developed chronic kidney rejection and is now back on hemodialysis awaiting a retransplant. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal is possible in up to 70% of pancreas transplant recipients. Further studies are necessary to define ideal candidates for steroid withdrawal. Based on the results of this analysis, we have launched a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.     

Sirolimus as primary immunosuppression agent in kidney transplant recipients: Akdeniz University experience

OBJECTIVES: Recently usage of sirolimus as the primary immunosuppressant is widening among kidney transplant recipients. We reviewed the clinical follow-up of patients transplanted at our center using sirolimus protocols. METHODS: Sirolimus including primary immunosuppressive treatment protocols were begun in February 2002. Among the 21 patients (15 men, six women) who received sirolimus, six patients were prescribed sirolimus + prednisolone; seven, sirolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone; and eight, sirolimus + cyclosporine + prednisolone. The mean age of the patients was 32.9 +/- 7.3 years and the mean posttransplantation follow-up, 13.2 +/- 4.5 months. RESULTS: Three patients experienced acute rejection episodes, which were treated successfully with steroids. None of the patients had either hematologic or wound healing problems. Lymphoceles developed in eight patients. Serum creatinine level was 1.4 +/- 0.5 mg/dL at 12 months. There was a serious increase in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels starting from the first month posttransplant (total cholesterol levels pretransplant and at 1 month, respectively: 159.3 +/- 29.5 and 255.7 +/- 52.3 mg/dL, P = .0001; triglycerides pretransplant and at 1 month, respectively: 146.9 +/- 89.5 and 215.1 +/- 102.5 mg/dL, P = .001). Despite routine antihyperlipemic treatment those high levels were maintained for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved 100% graft and patient survival rates for 1 year among patients who were using sirolimus. But the most important role in defining the morbidity and mortality in this group of patients is cardiovascular events; for this reason the abnormalities in the lipid profile must be taken seriously.