Intravitreal triamcinolone for the treatment of ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and foveal ischemia. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients with macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal ischemia. intervention: Four mg IVTA. main outcome measures: Visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography, macular thickness measurements, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of BRVO before treatment was 14 months. All patients were followed for a minimum of nine months, and 12 patients completed 12 months follow-up. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA improved significantly from 0.81 +/- 0.36 at baseline to 0.65 +/- 0.30 at one month (P = .03) but did not vary significantly from baseline at three, six, nine, and 12 months. Macular thickness improved significantly in all eyes from a mean of 400 +/- 134 mum preinjection, to 228 +/- 58 mum at one month (P < .01) and 256 +/- 121 mum at three months (P < .01) but did not vary significantly from baseline at six, nine, and 12 months. Eight eyes developed posterior subcapsular cataract, intraocular pressure (IOP) exceeded 21 mm Hg in four eyes, and two eyes developed vitreomacular traction during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IVTA is effective in reducing ischemic macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal capillary nonperfusion. This reduction is often associated with a temporary improvement in VA. Raised IOP and development of posterior subcapsular cataract are disadvantages of this treatment.     

Relation between reduction of foveal thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal triamcinolone

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness after a single intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHOD: Patients: In a prospective study 24 eyes with diabetic macular edema were treated with an intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected logMAR visual acuity and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline and 3 months after the treatment. RESULTS: At baseline the average foveal thickness was 462 +/- 154 microm (95% confidence interval, 397-527 microm) and at 3 months 257 +/-114 microm (95% confidence interval, 209-305 microm) (P < .0001). The best-corrected logMAR average visual acuity was 60.5 +/- 10.5 (95% confidence interval, 56.0-65.0) ETDRS letters at baseline compared with 65.5 +/- 11.1 (95% confidence interval, 60.8-70.1) 3 months after the injection (P = .0001). There was no correlation between the improvement in visual acuity and the reduction of foveal thickness (r = 0.054, P = .8), but there was a correlation between reduction in foveal thickness and the age of the patients (r = 0.53, P = .008). CONCLUSION: A single injection of 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide effectively reduces the foveal thickness in diabetic macular edema and improves visual acuity, but there does not appear to be a strong correlation between the reduction of foveal thickness and the improvement in visual acuity.     

Bevacizumab (Avastin) for diabetic macular edema in previously vitrectomized eyes

PURPOSE: To report the visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness (FT) changes after intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) in previously vitrectomized eyes. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. METHODS: Medical records of 11 eyes of 10 patients who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab injection for persistent DME were reviewed. This retrospective study included eyes that had persistent DME despite prior pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal at our institution with optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of DME. All eyes received three intravitreal injections of bevacizumab 1.25 mg/0.05 ml monthly. RESULTS: Mean FT was 408 +/- 77 microm at baseline, 453 +/- 97 microm at three months, and 454 +/- 101 microm at six months (P = .172). Mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores were 59 +/- 15 (20/80) at baseline, 59 +/- 16 (20/80) at three months, 57 +/- 15 (20/80) at six months (P = .398). CONCLUSION: No change in VA and FT was observed in the short-term after intravitreal bevacizumab for DME in previously vitrectomized eyes.     

Arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO were randomized into two treatment groups. A total of 20 patients received AV sheathotomy (sheathotomy group), and the second group of 20 patients was treated with IVTA (IVTA group). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) score, total macular volume measured, and foveal thickness by 3rd generation optical coherence tomography (OCT3) were evaluated as main outcome measurements. RESULTS: The average changes in ETDRS scores, total macular volumes, and foveal thicknesses compared to baseline values, were significant 3 months and 6 months after treatment in both groups (P < 0.05, paired t-test), but only the IVTA group showed significant improvements 1 month after treatment. The between-group differences in average ETDRS score, total macular volume, and foveal thickness changes were significantly better at 1 month after treatment in the ITVA group (P = 0.026, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively, Student's t-test), at which time IVTA patients had better vision and anatomical outcomes than did those in the sheathotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: After either AV sheathotomy or IVTA treatment, patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO showed similar functional and anatomical outcomes 6 months later. When the cost and the risks of vitreoretinal surgery are considered, IVTA treatment may be a better treatment option, as the drug yields better short-term outcomes.     

Early versus late intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of early versus late intravitreal injection of triamcinolone in patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients with macular edema from BRVO, including 10 with duration after onset of or 3 months, improvements in visual acuity and foveal thickness, though apparent at 1 month, were not maintained at 3 and 6 months post-triamcinolone. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone is more effective in patients with BRVO who are treated earlier.     

Comparison of two doses of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group at 6 months of follow-up

PURPOSE: To report the 6-month anatomical and visual outcomes after injecting two different doses of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: An interventional, retrospective multicenter study of 45 eyes that were treated with at least one intravitreal injection (24 eyes, 1.25 mg; 21 eyes, 2.5 mg) of bevacizumab is reported. The main outcome measures were the central 1-mm macular thickness (CMT) and the change in ETDRS lines of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were injected on average 26.1 months (range, 3-86 months) after the diagnosis. The average follow-up was 35.2 weeks (range, 24-52 weeks). All patients completed at least 6 months of follow-up. In the 1.25-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 4.5 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 5.1 lines of BCVA (P < 0.005). In the 2.5-mg dose group, at 1 month, there was an average gain of 2.3 lines of BCVA; at 3 months, 3.8 lines of BCVA; and at 6 months, 4.8 lines of BCVA (P = 0.05). In the 1.25-mg dose group, the mean CMT +/- SD decreased from 461 +/- 211 microm at baseline to 321 +/- 152 microm at 1 month, 273 +/- 99 microm at 3 months, and 277 +/- 114 microm at 6 months (P = 0.0002). In the 2.5-mg group, the mean CMT +/- SD decreased from 385 +/- 168 microm at baseline to 279 +/- 111 microm at 1 month, 249 +/- 97 microm at 3 months, and 240 +/- 93 microm at 6 months (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences between the two dose groups with regard to the number of injections and anatomical and functional outcomes. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab at doses up to 2.5 mg appears to be effective in improving BCVA and reducing CMT in BRVO in the short term. Multiple injections are needed in a large number of eyes for continued control of macular edema and preservation of visual acuity in the short term. Longer studies are needed to determine what role if any intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may play in the long-term treatment of this condition.     

Trans-tenon retrobulbar triamcinolone injection for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion remaining after vitrectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trans-Tenon retrobulbar triamcinolone injection for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) after vitrectomy. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: The study included 20 eyes of 20 patients with BRVO, characterized by macular edema lasting more than 3 months after vitrectomy. Trans-Tenon retrobulbar injection of 40 mg triamcinolone was performed, and visual and anatomic responses were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean foveal thickness was 499.4 +/- 209.1 microm preoperatively, 281.8 +/- 110.1 microm at 2-week follow-up, and 196.9 +/- 92.1 microm at 6-month follow-up (P < .0001, at 2 weeks and 6 months, paired t test). Improvement of visual acuity by at least 0.2 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was seen in 14 (70%) of the 20 eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-Tenon retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone may be an alternative for additional treatment of eyes with BRVO that remains after vitrectomy.     

The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone on foveal edema in exudative macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone (IVTA) on central macular thickness and visual acuity in eyes with minimally classic exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized clinical interventional study. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity were performed at baseline and one month after treatment. RESULTS: We identified 11 eyes with foveal edema and minimally classic subfoveal neovascularization treated with an IVTA. Foveal edema decreased significantly from 401 +/- 98 microm at baseline to 295 +/- 141 microm (mean +/- standard deviation; P = .004) at one month. There was, however, no significant change in visual acuity at one or three months after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This biological effect of IVTA does not support its clinical use, yet it does warrant further research to determine whether locally delivered corticosteroids may be synergistic with other treatments. Reduction in foveal edema is not necessarily associated with improved visual function in exudative AMD.     

Triamcinolone acetonide with vitrectomy for treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To review the efficacy of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Seventeen eyes with macular edema associated with BRVO underwent PPV with an intraoperative injection of TA (10 mg) into the vitreous cavity. Residual or recurrent macular edema was treated with postoperative sub-Tenon capsule injections of TA (20 mg). RESULTS: With PPV and an intraoperative injection of TA, 82% of eyes showed rapid reduction of macular edema; foveal thickness decreased from 507 +/- 115 microm preoperatively to 261 +/- 123 microm 2 months after surgery (P = 0.0041). However, 59% of eyes showed recurrence of macular edema during the follow-up period. Twelve eyes with residual or recurrent macular edema received sub-Tenon capsule injections of TA; of these eyes, 9 showed substantial reduction of macular edema. Foveal thickness decreased from 381 +/- 102 microm to 256 +/- 56 microm (P = 0.0076) 2 weeks after postoperative injections of TA. At the final visit, visual acuity (logMAR) improved from 0.74 +/- 0.40 preoperatively to 0.40 +/- 0.34 (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: An intraoperative injection of TA in combination with PPV has the potential to facilitate the absorption of macular edema associated with BRVO. In addition, residual or recurrent macular edema can be treated with additional sub-Tenon capsule injections of TA.     

Treatment of central retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin): preliminary results

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with intravitreal bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The ongoing prospective study included 8 consecutive patients (8 eyes) with macular edema secondary to CRVO (6 non ischemic and 2 ischemic), treated with intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg (0.05 mL) of bevacizumab. Main outcome was best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by optical coherence tomography monthly during one year. Retreatment criteria include decrease of BCVA, persistence of macular edema on angiograms and increase of CFT. RESULTS: Mean age of the eight patients was 68 years (range: 50-82 years). Mean duration of symptoms before injection was 98 days (range: 3-289). Mean follow-up was 3.25 months. At baseline, mean BCVA was 0.84 logMar and mean baseline CFT was 771 microm. Mean BCVA was 0.36 and mean CFT thickness was 275 microm (n = 8) at month 1, 0.41 and 411 microm at month 2 (n = 7), 0.3 and 344 microm at month 3 (n = 6), 0.3 and 397 microm at month 4 (n = 5), respectively. In 75 % of patients, a single injection was not sufficient, and retreatment needed. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of macular edema secondary to CRVO with intravitreal bevacizumab injection of 1.25 mg was well tolerated and associated with marked macular thickness reduction and BCVA improvement in all patients. A trend towards reduction of foveal thickness and improvement of visual acuity was observed in both acute and chronic CRVO.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To report the authors' experience after intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) injection in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusive disease (BRVO). METHODS: A consecutive retrospective review of patients with ME secondary to BRVO who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL). Patients underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation, which included nonstandardized Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or angiographic testing at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 27 consecutive patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injections. The mean length of follow-up was 5.3 months (median 6 months, range 3-8 months). The mean visual acuity improved from 20/200(-) at baseline to 20/100(-) at 1 month and 20/100(+) at 3 months and last follow-up (P < 0.001). The mean central 1 mm macular thickness was 478 microm at baseline and decreased to 310, 336, and 332 microm at 1 month, 3 months, and last follow-up (P < 0.001). Patients received an average of two injections (range one to three). No adverse side effects were observed following injections. CONCLUSION: The observed anatomic (by ophthalmic examination, OCT, and/or fluorescence angiography) and visual acuity improvements and lack of serious adverse side effects after intravitreal bevacizumab injection demonstrates, in principle, the potential of bevacizumab for the treatment of ME in this setting.     

Clinical, anatomic, and electrophysiologic evaluation following intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical, anatomic, and electrophysiologic response after single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for macular edema attributable to retinal vein occlusion. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized, interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with macular edema attributable to vein occlusion received intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg. Nine patients had central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and 12 patients had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Complete ophthalmic examination including optical coherence tomography (OCT) was done at baseline and follow-up visits. Fifteen patients underwent fluorescein angiography at baseline. Selected patients underwent electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) at baseline and follow-up. Follow-up was for 12 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, mean visual acuity was 20/381 (median, 20/400) and showed improvement to mean 20/135 (median, 20/60) after one month, (P = .001). At 12 weeks, mean visual acuity was 20/178 (median, 20/80) (P = .001). The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was 647.81 microm (median, 609.00 microm) at baseline and decreased to mean 293.43 microm (median, 222.00 microm) at one month (P = .001). At 12 weeks, mean CRT was 320.90 mum (median, 280.00 microm) (P = .001). ERG and VEP showed no worsening of the waveforms. There was no significant difference in the visual outcome between the BRVO and CRVO groups. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab appears to result in significant short-term improvement of visual acuity and macular edema secondary to vein occlusion. The present report confirms the previous studies. No ocular toxicity or adverse effects were observed. However, prospective, randomized, controlled long-term studies are required with an adequate number of patients.     

Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, with that of triamcinolone acetonide, a corticosteroid for reduction of diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-eight eyes of 14 patients with bilateral DME participated in this study. In each patient, one eye received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide and the other eye received 1.25 mg bevacizumab. The clinical course of best-corrected visual acuity (VA) with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart and averaged foveal thickness using optical coherence tomography was monitored for up to 24 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Before the injection, foveal thickness and VA were 522.3 +/- 91.3 microm and 0.64 +/- 0.28 microm in the triamcinolone-injected eye, and 527.6 +/- 78.8 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.18 microm in the bevacizumab-injected eye, respectively; there was no significant difference between the eyes. One week after the injection, both eyes showed significant regression of macular edema. The triamcinolone-injected eye (342.6 +/- 85.5 microm and 0.33 +/- 0.21 microm) showed significantly better results than the bevacizumab-injected eye (397.6 +/- 103.0 microm and 0.37 +/- 0.17 microm). However, both eyes showed the recurrence of macular edema with time, even at 24 weeks. Triamcinolone (410.4 +/- 82.4 microm and 0.47 +/- 0.25 microm) kept better results than bevacizumab (501.6 +/- 92.5 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.17 microm). CONCLUSIONS: With the generally used concentration, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide showed better results in reducing DME and in the improvement of VA than that of bevacizumab, suggesting that the pathogenesis of DME is not only attributable to VEGF-dependency, but is also attributable to other mechanisms suppressed by corticosteroid.     

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for persistent macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for persistent or recurrent macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation in branch retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with recurrent macular edema underwent vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. All eyes had previous intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation for macular edema. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery were compared. RESULTS: The mean preoperative BCVA (log MAR) were 0.79 +/- 0.29 and postoperative BCVA (log MAR) at 3 months was 0.57 +/- 0.33. And improvement of visual acuity > or = 2 lines was observed in 10 eyes (45%). The mean preoperative fovea thickness measured by OCT was 595.22 +/- 76.83 microm (510-737 microm) and postoperative fovea thickness was 217.60 +/- 47.33 microm (164-285 microm). CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy can be one treatment option for the patients with recurrent macular edema in BRVO.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with large submacular hemorrhage

PURPOSE: To evaluate functional and anatomic effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin; Roche Pharma, Vienna, Austria) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with large submacular hemorrhages. DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-one eyes of 19 AMD patients with choroidal neovascularization and large submacular hemorrhage involving the fovea comprising more than 50% of the total lesion area were evaluated. All patients completed at least four months of follow-up; 12 patients fulfilled 12 months or more of follow-up. Patients were treated with up to six intravitreal bevacizumab injections (1 mg/0.04 ml) at a minimum of four-week intervals. Changes from baseline visual acuity (VA) scores, retinal measurements by optical coherence tomography (OCT), angiographic lesion characteristics, and hemorrhage size were analyzed. A safety assessment was performed at all visits. RESULTS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections were well tolerated in all patients. At month 4, VA was stable or improved (visual loss of 3 acuity lines or fewer) in 100% and improved by at least 3 lines in 9.5%. Comparable results were found at month 12. On average, the central foveal thickness decreased significantly by 55 microm four weeks after the first injection (P < .001) and by 52 microm at month 4 (P = .002). A significant anatomic improvement also was found for maximum retinal thickness, minimum retinal thickness, and foveal volume (P < .05) and was maintained during four months of follow-up. Mean size of hemorrhage was significantly reduced from 19.7 mm(2) at baseline to 2.5 mm(2) at the four-month follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab seems to be a promising therapeutic option in eyes with neovascular AMD and large submacular hemorrhages, with a stabilization in VA and anatomic improvement.     

25-gauge vitrectomy and triamcinolone acetonide-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for chronic cystoid macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of 25-gauge vitrectomy and triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for chronic cystoid macular edema (CCME) in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Thirty-four patients (38 eyes) presenting with CCME in BRVO were treated prospectively by 25-gauge vitrectomy and ILM peeling. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CCME status were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, 6 months, and 7 months. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR BCVAs +/- SD were 0.69 +/- 0.42, 0.65 +/- 0.41, 0.59 +/- 0.32, 0.39 +/- 0.27, 0.35 +/- 0.31, 0.32 +/- 0.28, and 0.32 +/- 0.31 at the seven follow-up months, respectively. Mean foveal thicknesses +/- SD were 443 +/- 60 microm, 212 +/- 67 microm, 188 +/- 41 microm, 176 +/- 53 microm, 173 +/- 41 microm, 171 +/- 39 microm, and 170 +/- 41 microm at the 7 follow-up months, respectively. Compared with before surgery, BCVA improved, and CCME was absorbed significantly (P < 0.01, Dunnett test). Foveal thickness and logMAR BCVA 7 months after surgery had a significant negative linear correlation (r = -0.81, P < 0.01; Spearman rank correlation). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-five-gauge vitrectomy with TA-assisted ILM peeling is generally effective in reducing macular edema and improving BCVA for CCME in BRVO for at least 7 months.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a short-term study

PURPOSE: To report the short-term study of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Interventional, consecutive, prospective case series. METHODS: One hundred and two eyes of 102 patients with neovascular AMD received monthly intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) (1.25 mg) until resolution of macular edema, subretinal fluid, and/or pigment epithelial detachment. Outcome measures included visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness as defined from optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Mean VA was 20/80 and OCT central retinal thickness was 251.0 +/- 74.6 microm before injection and improved to 20/63 and 214.9 +/- 41.7 microm at six weeks (P < .001), 20/50 and 204.8 +/- 33.6 microm at 10 weeks (P < .001), and remained stable at 20/50 and 210 microm after 14 weeks (P < .05). No significant ocular or systemic side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) appears to be beneficial and well tolerated in the treatment of neovascular AMD in the short term. Further comparative evaluation against other antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and dosing schedule is warranted.     

Macular function by multifocal electroretinogram in diabetic macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess macular function by multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection. METHODS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with DME scheduled for 4 mg IVTA injection were prospectively recruited. The response to treatment was monitored functionally by visual acuity (VA) measurement and mfERG and anatomically by foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first-order kernel P1 mfERG responses from 0 to 7 degrees (central) and 7 to 25 degrees (peripheral) were grouped and analyzed. Changes in functional parameters (VAs and the P1 mfERG response amplitudes and peak latencies) and morphometric parameters (OCT foveal thickness) in eyes with DME 1 and 3 months after IVTA injection were compared with baseline values by Student t test. RESULTS: The mean baseline logMAR value for VAs of the patients before treatment was 0.49+/-0.26. After treatment, it was 0.27+/-0.23 at 1 month and 0.26+/-0.18 at 3 months, and differences from pretreatment values were significant (for each, p<0.001). There were statistically significant decreases in the mean foveal thickness at 1 and 3 months after treatment compared with pretreatment values (for each, p<0.001). There were also statistically significant increases in the mean P1 response amplitude for both central and peripheral groups at all examinations compared with pretreatment (for each, p<0.001). The mean P1 peak latencies for both the central and peripheral groups were shortened, but not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: As well as the reduction in DME and improvement in VA, IVTA injection improves macular function as assessed by mfERG in diabetic patients.     

Effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on retinal blood flow and macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on retinal blood flow (RBF) in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Seven eyes of 7 patients with BRVO underwent sheathotomy and were followed for more than 6 months. RESULTS: At 1 week postoperatively, the RBF in the affected vessels was significantly improved from 14.1 +/- 5.7 to 27.3 +/- 11.3 pixel(2)/sec (P < 0.01), and the foveal thickness (FT) was significantly reduced from 536 +/- 84 to 366 +/- 134 microm (P = 0.03). However, the RBF was reduced again to 11.7 +/- 7.7 pixel(2)/sec at 1 month postoperatively, and the FT was increased to 424 +/- 184 microm. CONCLUSIONS: Arteriovenous sheathotomy led to a transient improvement of the RBF and was effective in reducing macular edema. It is not clear whether the transient effect of sheathotomy affects the long-term visual acuity and macular edema.     

Effects of macular ischemia on the outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of macular ischemia on visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), after intravitreal bevacizumab injections. METHODS: Data on 59 eyes of 53 consecutive patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for DME were retrospectively reviewed. Data from preoperative fluorescein angiography (FA) tests were examined. Patients with an enlarged foveal avascular zone (FAZ), >or=1000 microm, or a broken perifoveal capillary ring at the border of the FAZ, with a distinct area of capillary nonperfusion within one disk diameter of the foveal center in the transit phase of fluorescein angiography, were defined as having macular ischemia. The patients were thus divided into two groups: with or without macular ischemia. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores, and foveal thicknesses measured using third generation ocular coherence tomography (OCT), were evaluated at baseline and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 months after treatment, the mean visual acuity (VA) score decreased from a baseline VA of 0.52 +/- 0.27 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/63) to 0.57 +/- 0.21 (20/80) in the ischemic group. In the nonischemic group, by contrast, the VA improved from 0.66 +/- 0.34 (20/100) at baseline to 0.59 +/- 0.33 (20/80) at 3 months post-treatment. Nine of 18 eyes (50%) in the ischemic group, but only 9 of 41 eyes (21%) in the nonischemic group, experienced visual losses of >or=1 line on the ETDRS chart (P = 0.031, Pearson chi-square test). Four eyes (22%) in the ischemic group, but only 2 eyes (5%) in the nonischemic group, lost >or=3 lines (P = 0.042, Pearson chi-square test). CONCLUSION: Macular ischemia may have a negative effect on short term visual outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab injections in patients with DME.