Immune reconstitution after autologous selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison of two CD34+ cell-selection systems

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ PBPCs has been applied as a method of reducing graft contamination from neoplastic cells. This procedure seems to delay lymphocyte recovery, while myeloid engraftment is no different from that with unselected PBPC transplants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Lymphocyte recovery was studied in two groups of patients who underwent autologous CD34+ PBPC transplant with two different technologies (Ceprate SC, Cellpro [n = 17]; CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotech [n = 13]). The median number of CD34+ cells transfused was 3.88 x 10(6) per kg and 3.32 x 10(6) per kg, respectively. Residual CD3 cells x 10(6) per kg were 4.97 and 0.58, respectively (p = 0.041). Residual CD19 cells x 10(6) per kg were 1.33 and 0.73, respectively (NS). RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups in total lymphocyte recovery to >0.5 x 10(9) per L, which achieved a stable count by Day 30. During the study period, the CD4+ cell count remained below 0.2 x 10(9) per L, and the B-cell subset showed a trend toward normalization. CD3/HLA-DR+ and CD16/56 increased markedly in both groups by Day 30. An increase in CMV (13%) and adenovirus (17.4%) infection was found in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CD34+ cell selection technologies used here determined an excellent CD34+ cell purity and an optimal depletion of T cells. The high rate of viral complications is probably due to the inability of residual T cells left from the CD34+ cell selection to generate, immediately after transplant, an adequate number of virus-specific lymphocytes.     

Comparison of intermittent- and continuous-flow cell separators for the collection of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after high-dose chemotherapy is a valuable therapy for patients with hematologic and solid malignancies. Several methods are used for harvesting PBPCs. The efficiency of intermittent- and continuous-flow blood cell separators in collecting progenitor cells from the blood of patients undergoing myeloablative treatment for cancer was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPC components (n = 133) were obtained from 72 patients by leukapheresis with continuous-flow machines (Spectra, COBE; CS 3000 Plus, Baxter) and with an intermittent-flow machine (MCS 3P, Haemonetics). The data were analyzed retrospectively. Blood samples obtained from the patients before leukapheresis and samples of the leukapheresis components themselves were analyzed for their content of RBCs, WBCs, platelets, and CD34+ cells. RESULTS: The Spectra processed more than twice the blood volume in the shortest time (15 L in 178 min), whereas the Baxter CS 3000 Plus (10 L in 185 min) and the MCS 3P (4.8 L in 239 min) processed significantly smaller volumes in a longer time. The mean ACD consumption was 403 mL with the MCS 3P, 900 mL with the CS 3000 Plus, and 1000 mL with the Spectra. The product volumes were 50 mL (CS 3000 Plus), 69 mL (MCS 3P), and 166 mL (Spectra). In all groups, differences in the preapheresis hemograms were not significant, but the Spectra group had fewer CD34+ cells than the other groups. Despite this, the differences in the number of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis components of all groups were without statistical significance. In the Spectra group, the collection of MNCs of 104 percent and CD34+ cells of 154 percent was significantly more efficient than that in the MCS 3P group (42.2% and 56%, respectively) or the CS 3000 Plus group (50.8% and 47.15%) as related to the patients' blood volume. CONCLUSION: PBPC collection can be performed successfully with continuous-flow and intermittent-flow blood cell separators. The Spectra had the best recovery of CD34+ cells within the shortest time. Leukapheresis with the MCS 3P is indicated if only a single venous access is available.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

移植物中CD34+细胞及T细胞亚型对HLA相合同胞异基因外周血造血干细胞移植预后的影响

目的 探讨移植物中CD34+细胞及T细胞剂量对HLA相合同胞异基因外周血造血干细胞移植(allo-PBSCT)预后的影响.方法 流式细胞术检测移植物中CD34+细胞,CD3+、CD3+CD4+及CD3+CD8+T细胞含量,按患者体重计算出移植物中单个核细胞(MNC),CD34+细胞,CD3+、CD3+CD4+及CD3+CD8+T细胞数量,根据中位数分别将患者分为高剂量组和低剂量组,比较高剂量和低剂量组患者移植后造血重建、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、移植相关死亡(TRM)、复发、总体生存(OS)率以及无病生存(DFS)率的发生情况.结果 CD34+细胞高剂量组(34例)移植后中性粒细胞和血小板的恢复速度显著加快(P值均<0.05).CD3+CD4+、CD3+CD8+T细胞高剂量组和相应低剂量组相比,Ⅱ-Ⅳ度aGVHD发生率有增高趋势(P值分别为0.089和0.098).CD3+CD4+及CD3+CD8+T细胞高剂量组和相应低剂量组相比,TRM显著增高(P值均<0.05);多因素分析显示,CD3+CD4+和CD3+CD8+T细胞输注剂量是患者TRM的影响因素(RR分别为13.12和25.90,P值均<0.05).各高剂量组和相应低剂量组比较复发率差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).CD3+ CD4+及CD3+CD8+T细胞高剂量组分别和相应低剂量组相比,OS显著降低(P值均<0.05);多因素分析显示,CD3+CD4+和CD3+CD8+T细胞输注剂量是患者OS的影响因素(RR分别为3.71和3.01,P值均<0.05);CD3+CD4+T细胞高剂量组和低剂量组相比,DFS显著降低(P值均<0.05);多因素分析显示,CD3+CD4+T细胞输注剂量(RR=6.91,P=0.011)是患者DFS的影响因素.结论 高剂量CD34+细胞移植可加快移植后造血重建;移植物中高含量的CD3+CD4+及CD3+CD8+T细胞会增加患者TRM,降低OS或DFS.     

Isolation of CD34+ progenitor cells from peripheral blood by use of an automated immunomagnetic selection system: factors affecting the results

BACKGROUND: The isolation of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood is being increasingly used in the setting of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Investigation of variables that may influence the effectiveness of CD34+ cell selection is of interest. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one CD34+ cell selections from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) (39 allogeneic and 12 autologous) were performed using a magnetic cell separator (Isolex 300i, Baxter), including version 2.0 software. The results obtained were analyzed for different processing variables. The feasibility of transplanting these isolated CD34+ cells was also analyzed. RESULTS: The isolated CD34+ cell fraction had a median purity of 88.9 percent (range, 47.8-98.3). The median recovery of CD34+ cells was 45.1 percent (13.8-76.2), and the median colony-forming unit- granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) content was 17. 2 percent (0.8-58.6). Logarithms of T- and B-cell depletion had median values of 3.7 and 2.8, respectively. The version 2.0 software of the Isolex 300i gave a higher CD34+ cell recovery in the enriched cell fraction (median 57.8%) than did version 1.11 (39.4%) or 1.12 (44.4%) (p = 0.01). The use of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I during cell processing yielded more CD34+ cells (53% vs. 41%, p = 0. 01) and higher purity (92.8% vs. 87%, p = 0.03). There was a correlation between the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody 8G12 clone and the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody used during the processing technique (9C5 clone) in the initial, enriched, and depleted CD34+ cell fractions (R(2) = 0.95; 0.92; 0.78, p< 0.005, respectively). Median times for recovering >0.5 x 10(9) per L of granulocytes and >20 x 10(9) per L of platelets were 13 and 16 days in the allograft patients and 13 and 14 days in the autograft patients. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cells can be highly and effectively isolated from allogeneic and autologous grafts by use of this automated technique, with a high grade of T- and B-cell depletion. These purified CD34+ cell components can engraft normally.     

Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products

BACKGROUND: The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells. RESULTS: Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r2 = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r2 = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r2 = 0.96 with the German protocol and r2 = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.     

PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and G-CSF with or without amifostine: results of a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The impact of amifostine on PBPC mobilization with paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus G-CSF was assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with a median age of 34 years (range, 19-53) who had germ cell tumor were evaluated for high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 500-mg dose of amifostine (Group A, n = 20) or no amifostine (Group B, n = 20) before mobilization chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given over 3 hours and ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)) given over 24 hours (TI) on Day 1. G-CSF at 10 microg per kg per day was given subsequent to TI with or without amifostine from Day 3 until the end of leukapheresis procedures. RESULTS: In 2 (10%) of 20 patients receiving amifostine and 3 (15%) of 20 patients not receiving it, no PBPC separation was performed because of mobilization failure. No significant differences were observed in the study arms with regard to the time from chemotherapy until first PBPC collection or the number of apheresis procedures needed to harvest more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Furthermore, leukapheresis procedures yielded comparable doses of CD34+ cells per kg (3.4 x 10(6) vs. 3.6 x 10(6); p = 0.82), MNCs per kg (2.7 x 10(8) vs. 2.6 x 10(8); p = 0.18), and CFU-GM per kg (15.9 x 10(4) vs. 19.3 x 10(4); p = 0.20). Patients in Group A had higher numbers of circulating CD34+ cells on Day 10 (103.0/microL vs. 46.8/microL; p = 0.10) and on Day 11 (63.0/microL vs.14.3/microL; p = 0.04) than did patients in Group B. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of amifostine before chemotherapy with TI mobilized higher numbers of CD34 cells in the circulation, but did not enhance the overall collection efficiency in the present trial.     

A prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effect on progenitor cells and engraftment

BACKGROUND: The influence of leukapheresis size on the number of harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells is still unclear. A prospective randomized crossover trial was thus performed, to evaluate the effect of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) versus normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on progenitor cells and engraftment in 26 patients with breast cancer and 15 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either LVL on Day 1 and on Day 2 or vice versa. The number of progenitor cells was evaluated in the harvest and before and after leukapheresis in the peripheral blood. RESULTS: The number of harvested CD34+ cells (4.8 x 10(6) vs. 3.4 x 10(6)/kg body weight, p < 0.001) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (3.1 x 10(5) vs. 2.4 x 10(5)/kg body weight, p = 0.0026) was significantly higher for LVL procedures than for NVL procedures. The median extraction efficacy, defined as the difference between the yield in the harvest and the decrease in the total number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood during leukapheresis, was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher for LVL than for NVL (2.6 x 10(8) and 8 x 10(7), respectively). In patients with breast cancer, the median amount of CD34+ cells in the harvest and the median extraction efficacy were higher for LVL than for NVL (p < 0.0001). This was not found for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSION: LVL results in a higher yield of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage than NVL, but only in patients with breast cancer and with high numbers of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood before leukapheresis.     

The use of hematocrit level for predicting the efficiency of peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection after G‐CSF Mobilization in Healthy Donors

Recently, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) has been widely used and replaced bone marrow (BM) as the stem cell source in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) because of a more rapid engraftment, easier accessibility, and lower risk of donor complications. We, therefore, report the predicting factors for the high PBSC harvest yields in 50 healthy donors. Among the 50 donors, median collected CD34⁺ cell number was 4.6 × 10^6/kg (1.5–16.3 × 10⁶/kg). Number of circulating CD34+ cells and hematocrit (HCT) level increased parallelly whereas peripheral CD34+ cell numbers were decreased with increasing donor age. In univariate analysis, HCT level≥ 35.5% at the time of PBSC collection was significantly associated with high PBSC number (≥ 5.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg) and donor aged <30 years was significantly associated with collected CD34+ cells ≥ 6.0 × 10⁶/kg, P = 0.03. HCT level ≥35.5% was an independent parameter for high WBC count (≥50 × 10⁹/L), P < 0.05. None of donor who had both HCT < 35.5% and WBC < 50 × 10⁹/L had circulating CD34+ cells ≥ 5.0 × 10⁶/kg. Platelet count ≥ 200 × 10⁹/L was found significantly in donors with WBC ≥ 40 × 10⁹/L (P = 0.03) and HCT ≥ 35.5%, P < 0.05. Collected PBSC number tended to be higher in our donors with high levels of HCT, WBC, and platelet. We also found that HCT and platelet levels in our donors decreased after receiving G‐CSF administration compared with the initial complete blood counts (CBC) results. We, therefore, concluded that HCT level at the time of initiation leukapheresis was an important predictor for PBSC collection yields. J. Clin. Apheresis 30:329–334, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The role of growth factor administration and T-cell recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of solid tumors: results from a randomized comparison of G–CSF and GM–CSF

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation (PBPCT) combined with post-PBPCT administration of myelopoietic growth factors is a valid therapeutic intervention to rapidly restore hematopoiesis after the delivery of intensive, myeloablative cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, the best growth factor regimen to potentiate PBPC-mediated immunohematopoietic recovery has yet to be determined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized evaluation, the effects produced by post-PBPCT G-CSF and GM-CSF on myeloid/lymphoid recovery and transplant outcome in women with chemosensitive cancer were compared. Thirty-seven ovarian cancer patients and 34 breast cancer patients ranging in age from 24 to 60 years were treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) high-dose chemotherapy and then randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) or GM-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) until Day 13 after PBPCT. Patients were compared in regard to hematopoietic recovery, posttransplant clinical management, and immune recovery. Finally, clinical outcome was estimated as time to progression and overall survival. RESULTS: Hematopoietic recovery and posttransplant clinical management were comparable in both the G-CSF and GM-CSF series. Conversely, significantly higher T-cell counts were observed in G-CSF-treated patients during the early and late posttransplant follow-up. Patients who received G-CSF showed a significantly longer median time to progression. A parallel analysis revealed that patients in whom a higher CD3+ count was recovered had a significantly longer overall survival and time to progression. CONCLUSION: The enhancement of post-PBPCT T-cell recovery observed in G-CSF-treated patients encourages the use of G-CSF to ameliorate immune recovery, which seems to play a role in post-PBPCT control of disease in cancer patients. GM-CSF might be administered to prolong immunosuppression after autologous PBPCT for autoimmune diseases or allogeneic PBPCT.     

Large-volume leukapheresis using femoral venous access for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells with the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors: predictors of CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency

The current paper reports on the predicting factors associated with satisfactory peripheral blood stem cell collection and the efficacy of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) using femoral vein catheterization to harvest PBSCs with Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. A total of 113 apheresis procedures in 57 patients were performed. The median number of MNCs, CD3+ cells, and CD34+ cells harvested per apheresis was 5.3 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.3-11.0 x 10(8)/kg), 3.0 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.2-6.6 x 10(8)/kg), and 7.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.1-188.9 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. The median collection efficiency of MNCs and CD34+ cells was 49.8% and 49.7%, respectively. A highly significant correlation was found between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis WBC counts in the donors (P = 0.013), and between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts (P<0.001). Harvesting at least >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells from the 1st LVL was achieved in 44 (77.2%) out of 57 donors and in 19 (90.5%) out of 21 donors with a PB-CD34+ cell count of >40/microl. There was no significant difference in the harvested MNC and CD34+ cell counts between the 1st and 2nd apheresis. The catheter-related complications included catheter obstruction (n = 2) and hematoma at the insertion site (n = 3). Accordingly, LVL using femoral venous access for allogeneic PBSC collection from normal healthy donors would appear to be safe and effective.     

Preclinical ex vivo expansion of cord blood hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: duration of culture; the media, serum supplements, and growth factors used; and engraftment in NOD/SCID mice

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo expansion of cord blood (CB) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells increases cell dose and may reduce the severity and duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after transplantation. This study's purpose was to establish a clinically applicable culture system by investigating the use of cytokines, serum-free media, and autologous plasma for the expansion of CB cells and the engraftment of expanded product in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Enriched CB CD34+ cells were cultured in four media (Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium with FCS, Gibco; X-Vivo-10, BioWhittaker; QBSF-60, Quality Biological; and StemSpan SFEM, Stem Cell Technologies) with four cytokine combinations (thrombopoietin [TPO], SCF, Flt-3 ligand [FL] with and without G-CSF, and/or IL-6). The effect of autologous CB plasma was also investigated. The read-out measures were evaluated on Days 8 and 12. After expansion at the optimized condition, cultured cells were transplanted into sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mice. The engraftment of human CD45+ cells and subsets in the bone marrow, spleen, and peripheral blood was determined. RESULTS: QBSF-60 or StemSpan SFEM supported high yields of early progenitors (CD34+ cells, 相似文献