Pioglitazone improves virological response to peginterferon α‐2b/ribavirin combination therapy in hepatitis C genotype 4 patients with insulin resistance

Background & aim: Insulin resistance (IR) affects sustained virological response (SVR). The use of insulin‐sensitizing agents has been proposed to improve therapy outcome. The safety and efficacy of pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity and SVR in treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 4 with IR receiving standard antiviral therapy were evaluated in a randomized‐controlled study. Methods: Ninety‐seven previously untreated patients with CHC and IR [homeostasis model assessment (HOMA>2)] were randomly assigned into two arms; (arm A; n=48) were given pioglitazone 30 mg/day combined with peginterferon (Peg‐IFN)‐α‐2b/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, and (arm B; n=49) were given standard of care (Peg‐IFN‐α‐2b/RBV for 48 weeks); HOMA index and hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV RNA) levels were measured at baseline, during therapy and follow‐up. Treatment was stopped in patients without an early virological response or those who were HCV RNA positive at 24 weeks. Results: Baseline data of both groups were comparable, with no significant statistical differences. The percentages of rapid virological response (RVR) and SVR were significantly higher in patients given triple therapy compared with standard of care (27.08 vs. 6.1%; P=0.006 and 60.4 vs. 38.7%; P=0.04 respectively); patients in arm A showed a greater decrease in the HOMA index than those in arm B (?1.8 ± 0.3, ?2.1 ± 0.3 vs. ?1.1 ± 0.6, ?1.3 ± 0.7) at week 24 and at the end of follow‐up (P=0.001 at both time points). The triple therapy was well tolerated. Conclusions: A combination of pioglitazone, Peg‐IFN‐α‐2b and ribavirin increased RVR, SVR and decreased IR, compared with patients given Peg‐IFN plus ribavirin without an increase in adverse events.     

Randomized trial of albinterferon alfa-2b every 4 weeks for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2/3

Summary. Albinterferon alfa‐2b (albIFN) is a fusion protein of recombinant human albumin/recombinant interferon (IFN)‐α‐2b, with ～200‐h half‐life. Safety/efficacy of albIFN q4wk was evaluated in 391 treatment‐naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2/3. Patients were randomized 3:4:4:4 to one of four open‐label treatment groups: pegylated IFN (Peg‐IFN)‐α‐2a 180 μg qwk or albIFN 900, 1200 or 1500 μg q4wk, plus oral ribavirin 800 mg/day, for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR; HCV RNA <20 IU/mL 24 weeks post‐treatment). SVR rates were as follows: 85%, 76%, 76% and 78% with Peg‐IFNα‐2a and albIFN 900, 1200 and 1500 μg, respectively (P = NS); corresponding rapid virologic response rates (HCV RNA <43 IU/mL at week 4) were as follows: 78%, 49% (P < 0.001), 60% (P = 0.01) and 71%. SVR rates were not influenced by interleukin 28B genotype, although rapid virologic response rates were greater with interleukin 28B CC (P = NS). Serious adverse event rates were as follows: 4%, 11%, 3% and 3% with Peg‐IFNα‐2a and albIFN 900, 1200 and 1500 μg, respectively. No increase in serious/severe respiratory events was noted with albIFN. Fewer absolute neutrophil count reductions <750/mm³ occurred with albIFN (P = 0.03), leading to fewer IFN dose reductions. Haemoglobin reductions <10 g/dL were less frequent with albIFN 900 and 1200 μg vs 1500 μg and Peg‐IFNα‐2a (P = 0.02), leading to fewer ribavirin dose reductions. albIFN administered q4wk produced fewer haematologic reductions than Peg‐IFNα‐2a, but had numerically lower SVR rates (P = NS) in patients with chronic HCV genotype 2/3.     

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy improves pancreatic β‐cell function in chronic hepatitis C patients

Background/Aims: Pretreatment insulin resistance (IR) is associated with treatment response to peginterferon plus ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection. However, the impact of PegIFN/RBV therapy on both IR and β‐cell function in CHC patients has rarely been investigated. Methods: A total of 277 non‐diabetic patients treated with PegIFN‐α and weight‐based RBV, with 80/80/80 adherence, were recruited. Their IR and β‐cell function by homeostasis model assessment model (HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐%B) before treatment and at 24 week after treatment [end of follow‐up (EOF)] was measured. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved by 79.4% (220/277) of all patients: 63.6% (75/118) of genotype‐1 and 91.2% (145/159) of genotype‐non‐1 patients. There was no significant change of HOMA‐IR post‐therapy (2.25 ± 2.46 vs 2.04 ± 2.12, P=0.42). By contrast, there was a significant reduction of HOMA‐%B of all patients at EOF (122.9 ± 145.2 vs 92.4 ± 73.2, P=0.001), particularly in those responders (119.1 ± 142.1 vs 89.6 ± 70.3, P=0.002). In 80 patients with high baseline HOMA‐IR, both HOMA‐IR and HOMA‐%B decreased significantly at EOF, irrespective of SVR achievement. Conclusion: This study demonstrated pancreatic β‐cell function was ameliorated by PegIFN/RBV therapy in CHC patients, particularly in those responders.     

Prediction of sustained response to low‐dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2b plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 1b and high hepatitis C virus level using viral reduction within 2 weeks after therapy initiation

Aim: Continuation of pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin at the recommended dose is difficult in elderly patients and/or patients with cytopenia or complications. Whether the therapeutic efficacy of low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy could be predicted based on virological response within 2 weeks of therapy initiation was evaluated. Methods: A total of 106 patients with a high viral load of genotype‐1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) underwent low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy. PEG‐IFN alpha 2b (0.75 µg/kg per week) and ribavirin (600–800 mg/day) were administered for 48 weeks. Results: Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 37%, and treatment was discontinued in 9%. On univariate analysis of SVR‐contributing factors, significant differences were noted in the white blood cell count, platelet count, fibrosis markers, and viral reduction within 2 weeks from therapy initiation. On multivariate analysis, the platelet count and the reduction in the HCV core antigen level at week 2 were independent factors. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for SVR based on a 1‐log or greater HCV‐RNA level reduction at week 2 were 65% and 90%, respectively, and those based on HCV core antigen level at week 2 were 64% and 97%, respectively. PPV and NPV based on a 2‐log or greater reduction of the RNA level were 86% and 67%, respectively, and those based on the core antigen level were 93% and 69%, respectively. Conclusion: Evaluation of viral reduction at week 2 after therapy initiation is useful for predicting SVR to low‐dose PEG‐IFN plus ribavirin therapy.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels with peginterferon α‐2a and ribavirin: a multicentric study

Background/Aims: To evaluate, in clinical practice, the efficacy and safety of combined antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Methods: Eighty‐eight HCV carriers with persistently normal ALT levels were enrolled. All patients received peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) α‐2a 180 μg once weekly plus ribavirin (RBV) 800 mg/day for 24 weeks (HCV‐2 and ‐3) or 1000–1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (HCV‐1). Results: Rapid virological response (RVR) was seen in 66/88 patients (75%): 19/32 HCV‐1 (59%), 40/46 HCV‐2 (87%) and 7/10 HCV‐3 patients. Younger patients, leaner subjects and patients with non‐1 genotype or lower baseline HCV RNA levels were more likely to achieve an RVR. Sustained virological response (SVR) was seen in 69/88 patients (78%): 20/32 HCV‐1 patients (62%), 41/46 HCV‐2 patients (89%) and 8/10 (80%) HCV‐3 patients. The overall SVR rate was 88% in patients with RVR (58/66) and 50% in those without RVR. Conclusions: The combination of PEG‐IFN α‐2a and RBV produces, in patients with normal ALT, virological response rates that are comparable or even higher than those obtained in patients with elevated ALT levels. Thus, we suggest that in selected cases immediate therapy might be preferred to a ‘wait‐and‐see’ policy.     

Treatment extension may benefit female genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients with complete early virological response to peginterferon-alpha-2b and ribavirin combination therapy

Aim: Little is known about the appropriate use of peginterferon‐α‐2b (PEG IFN‐α‐2b) or ribavirin (RBV) in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CH‐C) patients with complete early virological response (cEVR). Female patients, especially the older, are known to experience inferior treatment outcomes. Method: A total of 150 CH‐C patients with cEVR treated for 48 weeks (n = 104) or 52–64 weeks (n = 46) with PEG IFN‐α‐2b and RBV combination therapy were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the benefits of extended treatment. Results: In the 48‐week group, patients without a sustained virological response (SVR) were more often female (P = 0.004) and had received a significantly lower total RBV dose (P = 0.003) than those with SVR. The SVR rate in these female patients was similar to males with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA negativity at treatment week 8 (P = 0.413); however, it was lower than that in males with HCV RNA negativity at treatment week 12 (P = 0.005). In the 52–64‐week group, although the total RBV dose (mg/kg) after treatment week 48 was less in females than in males (P = 0.027), the SVR rate in females was equivalent to that in males (P = 0.604). Conclusion: Genotype 1 CH‐C patients treated with PEG IFN‐α‐2b and RBV combination therapy without SVR were more often female and had received a lower total RBV dose than males. The smaller SVR rate in female patients with cEVR compared to males may be overcome by extending treatment even if the RBV dose is lowered due to anemia.     

Efficacy of peginterferon‐α‐2b plus ribavirin in patients aged 65 years and older with chronic hepatitis C

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and indication of combination therapy with ribavirin plus peginterferon‐α‐2b in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients aged 65 years and older. Methods: Five hundred and ninety‐one consecutive HCV patients were treated with combination therapy. These patients were divided into elder patients (≥65 years) (n=115) and younger patients (<65 years) (n=476). The clinical characteristics, sustained virological response (SVR) rates and discontinuation rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with younger patients, baseline haemoglobin levels and baseline platelet counts were significantly lower (P<0.0001, P=0.013 respectively) and fibrosis was more advanced in elderly patients (P=0.0310). Moreover, the SVR rate was significantly lower (37.4 vs. 51.5%; P=0.0067) while the combination therapy discontinuation rate was significantly higher (32.2 vs. 17.0%; P=0.0003) in elderly patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that HCV load and genotype were significantly associated with an SVR in elderly patients. An SVR was achieved in over 50% of elderly male patients with genotype 1 and HCV RNA concentrations under 2 000 000 IU/ml. In contrast, the SVR rate was under 30% in elderly male patients with genotype 1 and with HCV RNA concentrations over 2 000 000 IU/ml and in all elderly female patients with genotype 1. Conclusions: The SVR rate was lower in elderly patients than in younger patients. However, in elderly patients combination therapy was most beneficial for genotype 1 patients, male patients with HCV RNA concentrations <2 000 000 IU/ml and patients with genotype 2.     

Safety and efficacy of faldaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α‐2b and ribavirin in Japanese patients with genotype‐1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Aim

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A A protease inhibitor faldaprevir plus pegylated interferon α‐2b and ribavirin (PegIFNα‐2b/RBV) in Japanese patients with HCV genotype‐1 infection.

Methods

Treatment‐naïve patients were randomized (1:1) to faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. for 12 or 24 weeks (response‐guided therapy [RGT], n = 44), or faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. for 12 weeks (n = 43), each combined with PegIFNα‐2b/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (RGT). Response‐guided therapy was based on early treatment success (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and <25 IU/mL undetected at week 8). Treatment‐experienced patients received 240 mg q.d. for 24 weeks, plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV RGT (24 or 48 weeks, prior relapsers, n = 29) or PegIFNα‐2b/RBV (48 weeks, 5 prior partial responders/breakthroughs, 10 prior null responders). The primary objective was safety; sustained virologic response 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12) was a secondary end‐point.

Results

All except one patient experienced drug‐related adverse events. Adverse events led to faldaprevir discontinuation in 1 (2%), 13 (20%), and 3 (6.8%) patients on faldaprevir 120 mg, faldaprevir 240 mg 12 weeks, and faldaprevir 240 mg 24 weeks, respectively. The SVR12 rates were: 86% with faldaprevir 120 mg and 74% with faldaprevir 240 mg among treatment‐naïve patients; and 86%, 60%, and 40% among prior relapsers, partial responders/breakthroughs, and null responders, respectively.

Conclusions

In treatment‐naïve Japanese patients, faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV was better tolerated than faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV, with at least comparable efficacy. In treatment‐experienced patients, most prior relapsers achieved SVR12 with 24 weeks of faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα‐2b/RBV. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01579474.

     

HCV RNA decline in chronic HCV genotype 2 and 3 during standard of care treatment according to IL28B polymorphism

The IL28 gene is highly associated with sustained viral response (SVR) in patients infected with genotype 1 after standard of care (SOC) treatment with peg‐IFN and ribavirin. It is also associated with a steeper first phase HCV RNA decline during treatment. In genotype 2 and 3 infections, these correlations are less obvious. We studied the IL28B association to rapid viral response (RVR), SVR, first and second phase HCV RNA decline during treatment in 100 HCV mono‐infected and 13 HCV/HIV co‐infected patients. We found a significantly higher mean baseline HCV RNA level in IL28B SNP CC than non‐CC mono‐infected patients, 6.99 vs 6.30 log₁₀ IU/mL (P = 0.02), and a significantly larger median 1st phase decline in patients with CC than non‐CC genotype, 2.03 vs 1.37 log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively. The overall SVR rate in HCV mono‐infected patients was 87% vs 77% in HCV/HIV co‐infected patients, with no correlation to IL28B SNP. In mono‐infected patients with RVR, the SVR rate was high and independent of IL28B genotype. In mono‐infected patients who failed to achieve RVR who had IL28B CC and non‐CC genotype, 64% and 67% achieved SVR, respectively. In genotype 2 and 3 infected patients, the 1st phase HCV RNA decline was steeper in patients with IL28B CC vs non‐CC genotype during SOC treatment. This did not translate into a higher frequency of RVR or SVR. Hence, the clinical relevance of pretreatment analysis of IL28B polymorphisms in genotype 2 and 3 infected patients can be questioned in patients with expected high SVR rate.     

Multicenter Study of Pegylated Interferon α‐2a Monotherapy for Hepatitis C Virus‐Infected Patients on Hemodialysis: REACH Study

Many studies have reported poor vital prognosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected dialysis patients. The rate of HCV‐infected dialysis patients in Japan is as high as 9.8%, and antiviral therapy is believed to be important for improving vital prognosis. We conducted a multicenter study to examine the administration method for pegylated interferon α‐2a (PEG‐IFNα‐2a) monotherapy in HCV‐infected dialysis. We studied 56 patients: 14 with low viral loads (HCV RNA < 5.0 log IU/mL) were treated with 90 μg PEG‐IFNα‐2a weekly, 42 with high viral loads (HCV RNA ≥ 5.0 log IU/mL) were treated with 135 μg PEG‐IFNα‐2a weekly. We examined the sustained virological response (SVR), factors affecting the SVR, and treatment safety. The overall SVR rate was 39% (22/56); that for genotype 1, genotype 2, low viral loads, and high viral loads was 29%, 67%, 93%, and 21%, respectively. From receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the HCV RNA cutoff values likely to achieve SVR for genotypes 1 and 2 were <5.7 log IU/mL (SVR rate: 64% 9/14) and <6.5 log IU/mL (SVR rate: 88% 7/8), respectively. If there was HCV RNA negativation at 4 weeks (rapid virological response), the SVR rate was 94% (16/17), whereas it was 6% (1/16) if there was HCV RNA positivity at 24 weeks. The rate of treatment discontinuation from adverse events or aggravated complications was 25% (14/56). High SVR rates can potentially be achieved with PEG‐IFN monotherapy by identifying the target patients, based on virus type and viral load before initiating treatment and by modifying therapy during treatment according to responsiveness.     

Analysis of the efficacy of treatment with peginterferon α‐2a and ribavirin in patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus

Objective: To study the virological features of patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the efficacy of combination therapy with peginterferon α‐2a and ribavirin in these patients. Methods: The epidemiological and virological data of 50 patients coinfected with HBV and HCV were analysed. The virological response rates of patients treated with peginterferon α‐2a and ribavirin between the HBV and HCV coinfection group and the HCV monoinfection group were compared. Results: HCV‐dominant virus strains accounted for 92.0% of the 50 coinfected individuals, and HCV‐ and HBV‐dominant virus strains accounted for the remaining 8.0%. The HBV DNA level of the patients coinfected with HBV and HCV was 4.6±0.9 log₁₀ copies/ml, which was significantly lower than that in the HBV monoinfection group (5.9±1.2 log₁₀ copies/ml) (t=5.964, P<0.01). The HBeAg‐positive rate (12.0%, 6/50) of the coinfection group was significantly lower than (45.3%, 19/42) that of the HBV monoinfection group (χ²=12.743, P<0.01). The partial early virological response (pEVR) rate and the end‐of‐treatment virological response (ETVR) rate (50.0%, 15/30; 90.0%, 27/30) of patients with genotype 1 in the coinfection group were significantly higher than those (16.0%, 4/25; 56.0%, 14/25) in the HCV monoinfection group (χ²=6.971, P=0.008; χ²=8.307, P=0.004). The relapse rate (55.6%, 15/27) of patients with genotype 1 in the coinfection group was significantly higher than that (21.4%, 3/14) in the HCV monoinfection group (χ²=4.360, P=0.037). The sustained virological response (SVR) rate (40.0%, 12/30) of patients with genotype 1 in the coinfection group was compared with that of the HCV monoinfection group (44.0%, 11/25) (χ²=0.090, P=0.765). There was no significant difference in the on‐treatment virological response, ETVR, SVR and relapse rates between two groups for patients with genotype 2. The incidence of side effects (30%, 15/50) of patients in the coinfection group was significantly higher than that (13%, 6/46) in the HCV monoinfection group (χ²=4.031, P=0.045). The reactivation rate of HBV DNA (33.3%, 9/27) with HCV SVR was significantly higher than that of patients without SVR (8.7%, 2/23) (χ²=4.393, P=0.036). Conclusions: The replication of HBV was suppressed, and HCV was the dominant virus strain. Compared with HCV‐monoinfected patients, pEVR, ETVR and relapse rates of patients with genotype 1 in the coinfection group were high, while they shared similar SVR rates. HBV and HCV coinfection had no impact on the rate of virological response for genotype 2.     

Predicting the response to 48‐week combination therapy with peginterferon α‐2b plus ribavirin from the estimated HCV RNA load index after negative serum change in genotype 1b hepatitis C patients

Aim: We estimated viral dynamics after serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA became negative and assessed the relation between the estimated viral load at the end of treatment (EVE) index and the response to the combination therapy with peginterferon α‐2b plus ribavirin. Methods: Patients with chronic HCV, genotype 1b, and a high viral load were treated with this combination therapy for 48 weeks, and serum HCV RNA was measured frequently during the treatment period. In the patients showing an end‐of‐treatment response (ETR), the viral load profile from the start of treatment until serum HCV RNA became negative was expressed by an approximate curve. Then the EVE index was calculated by using the expression obtained from the curve, and differences between the sustained virologic response (SVR) and relapse groups were investigated. Results: The SVR rate increased as the EVE index became lower, and the EVE index was significantly lower in the SVR group than in the relapse group. The SVR rate was higher for those in whom the EVE index was below the cut‐off point. Conclusion: Prediction of SVR and relapse from the EVE index is more useful than prediction from viral dynamics at the time when HCV RNA becomes negative or when HCV RNA shows a decrease of 2‐log or more.     

Relapse of hepatitis C in a pegylated‐interferon‐α‐2b plus ribavirin‐treated sustained virological responder

A 41‐year‐old woman with chronic hepatitis C was treated with pegylated‐interferon (PEG‐IFN)‐α‐2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. She had hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a (1600 KIU/mL), and her liver histology showed mild inflammation and fibrosis. Four weeks after the start of the therapy, she achieved a rapid virological response (RVR) and then a sustained virological response (SVR). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels remained within normal ranges and HCV RNA continued to be negative. However, ALT levels flared with the re‐emergence of HCV RNA in the serum 1.5 years after discontinuation of therapy. HCV RNA obtained from sera before therapy and after relapse shared a 98.6% homology with the E2 region, and phylogenetic analyses indicated that they were the same HCV strain. These results eliminated the possibility of a re‐infection and strongly indicated a late relapse of the disease. Therefore, follow‐up is necessary for chronic hepatitis C patients after SVR, even if they respond well to therapy, including RVR.     

Sustained virological response of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 depends on pegylated interferon compliance

Aim: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 are more sensitive to interferon (IFN) therapy than those infected with genotype 1, but 10–20% of patients do not achieve a sustained viral response (SVR) to combination therapy with pegylated (PEG) IFN and ribavirin (RBV). This study examines the prognostic factors associated with SVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 2 treated with PEG IFN and RBV. Methods: We treated 149 patients with chronic hepatitis C caused by HCV genotype 2. The patients received s.c. PEG IFN‐α‐2b (1.5 µg/kg) and a weekly weight‐adjusted dose of RBV (600, 800 and 1000 mg per <60, 60–80 and >80 kg, respectively) for 24 weeks and then prognostic factors associated with the SVR were examined. Results: Among the 149 patients, 138 completed the combination therapy and a sustained viral response was achieved in 71.8% of them. Univariate analysis showed that age, as well as mean RBV and PEG IFN doses were factors affecting the SVR (P = 0.012, =0.021, =0.014). Multivariate analysis identified age and mean PEG IFN dose (P = 0.021, =0.018, respectively) as factors involved in the SVR, but not mean RBV dose. Conclusion: The SVR of patients infected with HCV genotype 2 depended on the dosage of PEG IFN, but not of RBV. Selecting sufficient doses of PEG IFN for combination with RBV is critical for treating such patients.     

Time to viral suppression is not related to achievement of SVR12 in HCV GT1‐infected patients treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin

High rates of sustained virologic response at post‐treatment week 12 (SVR12) were achieved in six phase 3 trials of ombitasvir (OBV, an NS5A inhibitor), paritaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) co‐dosed with ritonavir (PTV/r) + dasabuvir (DSV, an NS5B RNA polymerase inhibitor) (ie, 3D regimen) with or without ribavirin (RBV) in adults with chronic genotype (GT) 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We assessed whether time to first HCV RNA value below the lower limit of quantification in patients with and without cirrhosis was associated with achievement of SVR12. Data were analysed from GT1‐infected patients enrolled in six phase 3 studies of 3D ± RBV. Patients who experienced non‐virologic failure were excluded from analysis. HCV RNA was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan RT‐PCR assay (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ =25 IU/mL). SVR12 was analysed by week of first HCV RNA suppression, defined as HCV RNA <LLOQ. The analysis included a total of 2027 patients. Cumulative proportions of subjects with initial HCV RNA suppression <LLOQ at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6 were 31%, 81%, 99% and 100%, respectively. SVR12 was achieved by 98%, 97%, 98% and 92% of patients with initial suppression at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6, respectively (P=.42, trend test). Across six phase 3 trials of 3D ± RBV, most patients achieved viral suppression by week 2. Time to viral suppression was not associated with subsequent achievement of SVR12, suggesting that on‐treatment virologic monitoring may not be necessary with this regimen.     

Efficacy of pegylated interferon‐α2a monotherapy in Japanese children with chronic hepatitis C

Aim: There is little information available on the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) therapy for children with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of PEG IFN‐α2a monotherapy for children infected by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methods: From 2004–2006, we conducted a prospective, open‐label, multicenter study of 22 patients aged 4–18 years, including eight with genotype 1 and 14 with genotype 2. None had previously received IFN. The patients were treated with s.c. PEG IFN‐α2a at a dose of 3 µg/kg once a week for 48 weeks. Rapid virological response (RVR) was defined as: undetectable serum HCV RNA at week 4; early viral response (EVR) as a 2 or more log reduction or undetectable serum HCV RNA at week 12; and sustained viral response (SVR) as undetectable serum HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the cessation of treatment. Results: SVR was achieved in 10 (45%) of the 22 patients (three with genotype 1, seven with genotype 2). Retrospectively, the patients with SVR included five with RVR (one with genotype 1, four with genotype 2) and five with EVR (two with genotype 1, three with genotype 2). PEG IFN‐α2a monotherapy was well tolerated, except in one patient in whom alanine aminotransferase activity flared (>500 IU/L) during treatment. Conclusion: The efficacy of PEG IFN‐α2a monotherapy in children is similar to that for adults, while tolerability seems to be better in children than in adults.     

Valuable antiviral therapeutic options for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C may represent an obstacle for the initiation of antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors predictive of successful pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) α2b and ribavirin (RBV) treatment for patients with thrombocytopenia with no history of splenectomy or partial splenic embolization. One hundred and fifty‐one chronic hepatitis C patients (genotype 1: n = 110, genotype 2: n = 41) with TCP (<100 × 10⁹/L) at baseline were enrolled. Pretreatment variables included interleukin 28B (IL28B) genotype (rs8099917) and homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance score (HOMA‐IR). The kinetics of haemoglobin and platelets according to the inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) genotype (rs1127354) were investigated. Sustained virological response (SVR) was significantly more frequent in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 (65.9%) than in genotype 1 (34.5%) patients (P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis of HCV genotype 1 extracted IL28B TT genotype [odds ratio (OR) 5.97, P = 0.006] and HOMA‐IR <2.5 (OR 7.14, P = 0.0016) as significant independent pretreatment predictors of SVR. The analyses of HCV genotype 2 showed that HOMA‐IR was significantly related to SVR, but IL28B genotype was not. Patients with ITPA CC genotype showed a significant haemoglobin reduction and lower degree of platelets decrease than those with ITPA CA/AA genotypes. The most common reason for premature discontinuation of treatment was the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8, 5.3%). In conclusion, HOMA‐IR is a useful predictor of SVR for patients with thrombocytopenia infected with HCV genotype 1 or 2 treated with PEG‐IFNα2b and RBV. The inclusion of IL28B, ITPA genotypes and HOMA‐IR adds valuable therapeutic information.     

Simple formula to predict response to peginterferon alpha2b and ribavirin combination therapy in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients with high viral loads

Aim: We advocate a simple formula which can conveniently predict the outcome of Peg‐interferon (IFN) alpha2b and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CH‐C) with high viral load. Methods: A total of 338 (group A: 230, Group B: 108) genotype 1 CH‐C patients treated with Peg‐IFN alfa‐2b and RBV were enrolled. Clinical parameters differing significantly between sustained virological responders (SVRs) and non‐SVRs in group A were categorized, then a simple formula to predict SVR was constructed and re‐evaluated in group B. Another formula containing hepatitis C virus amino acid mutations/substitutions also was constructed. Results: In group A, gender and HCV RNA load <1000 KIU were significant predictors of SVR by multivariate logistic regression analysis. A simple formula was constructed (formula A): male gender (point 2) + HCV RNA load <1000 KIU (3) + platelet counts ≥15 × 10⁴ /mm³ (1) + age <60 (1). In group A, score (0–1) predicted SVR rate 23.8% (2–4): 48.1% and (5–7): 70.2%. According to this formula, score (0–1) predicted SVR rate 7.1% (2–4): 38.6%, and (5–7): 70.3% in group B. Information on HCV amino acid mutations/substitutions seemed to add some accuracy. Conclusions: This simple formula can be used to roughly determine, at the patients' first/second visit, the probability of response to Peg‐IFN alpha2b and RBV combination therapy for genotype 1 CH‐C with high viral load.     

Adjuvant epoetin‐β with peginterferon‐α and ribavirin in Japanese ribavirin‐intolerant relapsed patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 2

Erythropoietin is widely used in the USA and some other Western countries to maintain doses of ribavirin during peginterferon/ribavirin‐based treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the impact of erythropoietin on sustained virological response (SVR) is unclear. Here, we report the cases of three Japanese ribavirin‐intolerant relapsed patients with HCV genotype 2 who achieved SVR from retreatment by adding erythropoietin. Three women aged 50, 64 and 68 years with chronic HCV genotype 2 received retreatment with peginterferon‐α and ribavirin. During their prior therapy, HCV RNA became negative according to real‐time polymerase chain reaction at weeks 4–8 in all three patients; however, the total dose of ribavirin was 18.1–30.6% lower than the planned dose, and HCV RNA relapsed post‐treatment. At present, epoetin‐β 24 000 IU was introduced at weeks 2 or 3 of dual‐combination therapy, resulting in a less than 4.2% reduction in the total dose of ribavirin. HCV RNA became negative at weeks 4–8, and all patients achieved SVR. Until the next‐generation antiviral treatments for HCV genotype 2 become available, the addition of erythropoietin to dual therapy can be a treatment of choice for ribavirin‐intolerant relapsed patients.     

Decline in pulmonary function during chronic hepatitis C virus therapy with modified interferon alfa and ribavirin

Rare interstitial lung disease cases have been reported with albinterferon alfa‐2b (albIFN) and pegylated interferon alfa‐2a (Peg‐IFNα‐2a) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. Systematic pulmonary function evaluation was conducted in a study of albIFN q4wk vs Peg‐IFNα‐2a qwk in patients with chronic HCV genotypes 2/3. Three hundred and ninety‐one patients were randomly assigned 4:4:4:3 to one of four, open‐label, 24‐week treatment groups including oral ribavirin 800 mg/d: albIFN 900/1200/1500 μg q4wk or Peg‐IFNα‐2a 180 μg qwk. Standardized spirometry and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were recorded at baseline, weeks 12 and 24, and 6 months posttreatment, and chest X‐rays (CXRs) at baseline and week 24. Baseline spirometry and DLCO were abnormal in 35 (13%) and 98 (26%) patients, respectively. Baseline interstitial CXR findings were rare (4 [1%]). During the study, clinically relevant DLCO declines (≥15%) were observed in 173 patients (48%), and were more frequent with Peg‐IFNα‐2a and albIFN 1500 μg; 24 weeks posttreatment, 57 patients (18%) still had significantly decreased DLCO, with a pattern for greater rates with albIFN vs Peg‐IFNα‐2a. One patient developed new interstitial CXR abnormalities, but there were no clinically relevant interstitial lung disease cases. The risk of persistent posttreatment DLCO decrease was not related to smoking, alcohol, HCV genotype, sustained virologic response, or baseline viral load or spirometry. Clinically relevant DLCO declines occurred frequently in chronic HCV patients receiving IFNα/ribavirin therapy and commonly persisted for ≥6 months posttherapy. The underlying mechanism and clinical implications for long‐term pulmonary function impairment warrant further research.