Optimal entry points and trajectories for cervical pedicle screw placement into subaxial cervical vertebrae

The present study was performed to determine the optimal entry points and trajectories for cervical pedicle screw insertion into C3–7. The study involved 40 patients (M:F = 20:20) with various cervical diseases. A surgical simulation program was used to construct three-dimensional spine models from cervical spine axial CT images. Axial, sagittal, and coronal plane data were simultaneously processed to determine the ideal pedicle trajectory (a line passing through the center of the pedicle on coronal, sagittal, and transverse CT images). The optimal entry points on the lateral masses were then identified. Horizontal offsets and vertical offsets of the optimal entry points were measured from three different anatomical landmarks: the lateral notch, the center of the superior edge and the center of lateral mass. The transverse angle and sagittal angles of the ideal pedicle trajectory were measured. Using those entry points and trajectory results, virtual screws were placed into the pedicles using the simulation program, and the outcomes were evaluated. We found that at C3–6, the optimal entry point was located 2.0–2.4 mm medial and 0–0.8 mm inferior to the lateral notch. Since the difference of 1 mm is difficult to discern intra-operatively, for ease of remembrance, we recommend rounding off our findings to arrive at a starting point for the C3–6 pedicle screws to be 2 mm directly medial to the lateral notch. At C7, by contrast, the optimal entry point was 1.6 mm lateral and 2.5 mm superior to the center of lateral mass. Again, for ease of remembrance, we recommend rounding off these numbers to use a starting point for the C7 pedicle screws to be 2 mm lateral and 2 mm superior to the center of lateral mass. The average transverse angles were 45° at C3–5, 38° at C6, and 28° at C7. The entry points for each vertebra should be adjusted according to the transverse angles of pedicles. The mean sagittal angles were 7° upward at C3, and parallel to the upper end plate at C4–7. The simulation study showed that the entry point and ideal pedicle trajectory led to screw placements that were safer than those used in other studies.     

Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans

In spite of concerns about safety during their insertion, cervical spine pedicle screws have demonstrated biomechanical superiority over lateral mass screws in several biomechanical studies. One of the concerns for placement of cervical pedicle screws is their small size. Preoperative planning with computed tomography to assess pedicle width has been shown to be extremely accurate and is recommended by several authors. To date there has been no study assessing the accuracy of oblique radiographs for pedicle measurement. We sought to compare accuracy of the oblique radiographic measurements of cervical pedicle width with axial CT scan measurements. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines C3–C7 were studied. Thin cut 1.25 mm computed tomography axial cuts were made through the pedicle isthmus. Oblique radiographs at 35°, 45°, and 55° angles were taken of the right and left pedicles of each specimen using a standardized technique. Each radiograph contained a pin of known length to correct for magnification. All pedicles were again measured and corrected for magnification using the standard pin. Corrected oblique radiograph measurements were compared to CT for each specimen. The outer pedicle width was measured and agreed upon by consensus. The radiograph measurements were on average significantly larger than CT measurements for the pedicles indicating that the pin standard did not completely correct magnification. Plain radiographic data failed to reveal that one oblique angle was favorable to another in terms of magnification or precision. Plain radiographs at oblique angles do not provide accurate measurements of subaxial cervical pedicles at 35°, 45°, or 55° angles. We recommend that thin cut axial CT scans be obtained on all patients prior to transpedicular fixation in the cervical spine. This research was supported by Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Medical Group Orthopaedic Faculty Practice Institutional funds.     

椎板后壁部分刮除辅助透视行颈椎弓根钻孔

目的探索椎板后壁部分刮除辅助透视行下颈椎椎弓根钻孔的可行性。方法3具新鲜尸体下颈椎的30例椎弓根，透视确定椎弓根轴线所在高度，将此高度侧块与椎板后壁交界内外侧各5mm范围内的皮质骨去除，刮除其下松质骨，先暴露出内侧的椎板前壁，后紧贴椎板前壁向外侧刮除，找到椎弓根入口。根据内倾角确定入口外侧骨质去除范围，以椎弓根内壁为参照，透视确定上倾角，行髓腔钻孔。CT扫描明确钻孔准确性。结果1例髓腔消失，放弃钻孔；27例钻孔准确；2例髓腔〈3mm，椎弓根外壁向外侧移位，但〈2mm。结论椎板后壁部分刮除辅助透视行下颈椎椎弓根髓腔钻孔效果满意。     

The ipsilateral lamina–pedicle angle: can it be used to guide pedicle screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine?

Pedicle screws in the sub-axial spine are infrequently used because of concerns over their safety and difficulty in placement, despite their superior pullout strength. In the sub-axial cervical vertebrae, we have observed that the lamina appears to project at right angles to the ipsilateral pedicle axis. The aim of this investigation was to confirm the lamina orientation as a reliable landmark for pedicle screw placement. 80 digital cervical spine CT were analysed. The angle formed by the ipsilateral outer lamina cortex to the pedicle axis was recorded. A total of 398 vertebrae were analysed from patients with a mean age of 39.5 years (range 18–78). Average axial lamina–pedicle angle ranged from 96.6° at C3 to 87.2° at C7 in males, and from 95.6° to 87.5° in females. The angle formed by the posterior cortex of the lamina and the ipsilateral pedicle shows a high level of consistency for sub-axial cervical vertebrae ranging from 96° at C3 to 87° at C7. Although the angle is not exactly 90° at all levels as hypothesised, the orientation of the lamina, nevertheless, forms a useful reference plane for insertion of pedicle screws in the sub-axial cervical spine.     

Alignment of pedicle screws with pilot holes: can tapping improve screw trajectory in thoracic spines?

Pedicle screws are placed using pilot holes. The trajectory of pilot holes can be verified by pedicle sounding or radiographs. However, a pilot hole alone does not insure that the screw will follow the pilot hole. No studies have characterized the risk of misalignment of a pedicle screw with respect to its pilot hole trajectory. The objective of this study was to measure the misalignment angles between pedicle screws and pilot holes with or without tapping. Six human cadaveric thoracic spines were used. One hundred and forty pilot holes were created with a straight probe. Steel wires were temporarily inserted and their positions were recorded with CT scans. The left pedicles were tapped with 4.5 mm fluted tap and the right pedicles remained untapped. Pedicle screws (5.5 mm) were inserted into the tapped and untapped pedicles followed by CT scans. The trajectories of pilot holes and screws were calculated using three-dimensional vector analysis. A total of 133 pilot holes (95%) were inside pedicles. For the untapped side, 14 out of 68 (20%) screws did not follow the pilot holes and were outside the pedicles. For the tapped side, 2 out of 65 (3%) did not follow and breached the pedicles. The average misalignment angles between the screw and pilot hole trajectory were 7.7° ± 6.5° and 5.6° ± 3.2° for the untapped side and tapped side, respectively (P < 0.05). Most pedicle screws had lateral screw breach (13 out of 16) whereas most pilot holes had medial pedicle breach (6 out of 7). Tapping of pilot holes (1 mm undertap) helps align pedicle screws and reduces the risk of screw malposition. Although most pedicle screws had lateral breach, the risk of medial pedicle breach of the pilot holes must be recognized.     

Radiological analysis of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe kyphosis before and after pedicle subtraction osteotomy

This is a radiographic study of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe fixed kyphotic deformity who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Our goal was to measure and validate new angle to assess global kyphosis and to evaluate the radiological outcomes after surgery. This is the first report which describes new angle to assess global kyphosis (T1-S1). Pre and postoperative controls were compared according to the Pelvic Incidence. The sagittal parameters ankylosing spondylitis patients were compared with 154 asymptomatic patients. In addition to the pelvic parameters and the C7 tilt, we used the spino-sacral angle. Pelvic incidence in ankylosing spondylitis patients was higher than asymptomatic population (61 vs. 51°). For a same tilt of C7 for both groups, the low pelvic incidence group had a lower sacral slope and pelvic tilt and a higher global kyphosis (spino-sacral angle = 90°) than the high pelvic incidence group (spino-sacral angle = 98°). In the adult volunteers, the C7 tilt and spino-sacral angle measured, respectively, 95 and 135°. The preoperative C7 tilt measured 73° and increased to 83° (p = 0.0025). The preoperative spino-sacral angle measured 96° and increased to 113.3° (p = 0.003). A low pelvic incidence pelvis has a lower sacral slope than in high pelvic incidence and can support a bigger kyphosis. All the parameters were improved by the pedicle subtraction osteotomy, but the average spino-sacral angle remained lower than the control group. When C7 tilt was useful to assess the improvement of the balance, SSA allowed a better evaluation of the correction of kyphosis itself.     

Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography measurements in 122 consecutive clinical cases

Background contextSuccessful placement of pedicle screws in the cervical spine requires a sufficient three-dimensional understanding of pedicle morphology to allow accurate identification of the screw axis.PurposeThe goal of the present study was to assess morphologic trends from one level to the next with respect to linear and angular parameters associated with the subaxial cervical pedicles.Study design/settingWe evaluated the pedicle morphology of cervical spine using axial and sagittal computed tomography (CT) imaging. The C3–C7 vertebrae in 122 patients (610 vertebrae) were evaluated (age range, 14–93; mean, 48 years).MethodsThin cut (2.5 mm thickness) axial CT images were measured. Sagittal reconstructions were obtained using 1.25-mm thickness slices. The following pedicle parameters were assessed: pedicle width (PW, the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis), pedicle height (PH, rostro-caudal dimension of the pedicle determined on the sagittal image), maximal screw length (MSL, distance from the posterior cortex of the lateral mass to the anterior wall of the vertebral body along the pedicle axis), and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, angle between the pedicle axis and the midline vertebral body).ResultsThe overall mean PW and PH ranged from 4.7 to 6.5 mm and 6.4 to 7.0 mm, respectively. For both these parameters there was a trend toward increasing size proceeding caudally in the cervical spine. The mean PW and PH was greater in males than in females, and this difference was statistically significant at all levels (p<.0001). The overall mean MSL ranged from 29.9 to 32.9 mm. All intersections of the pedicle axis and the posterior cortex of the lateral mass were located at the most lateral portion of the lateral mass for the C3–C6 vertebrae. The overall mean PTA ranged from 37.8° to 45.3°. The overall mean PTA was approximately 44° from C3 to C6 and 37.8° at C7.ConclusionThe findings of our radiological anatomical study suggest that the preoperative CT scans of patients undergoing cervical transpedicular fixation should be thoroughly analyzed and close attention paid to the pedicle size and its angulation. The placement of cervical pedicle screws should be individualized for each patient and based on detailed preoperative planning.     

Lamina-guided lateral mass screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine

Lateral mass (LM) screws are commonly used in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine because of their perceived safety over pedicle screws. A possible complication of cervical LM screw placement is vertebral artery injury or impingement. Several screw trajectories have been described to overcome the risks of neurovascular injury; however, each of these techniques relies on the surgeon’s visual estimation of the trajectory angle. As the reliability hereof is poorly investigated, alignment with a constant anatomical reference plane, such as the cervical lamina, may be advantageous. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether alignment of the LM screw trajectory parallel to the ipsilateral cervical lamina reliably avoids vertebral artery violation in the sub-axial cervical spine. 80 digital cervical spine CT were analysed (40 female, 40 male). Exclusion criteria were severe degeneration, malformations, tumour, vertebral body fractures and an age of less than 18 or greater than 80 years. Mean age of all subjects was 39.5 years (range 18–78); 399 subaxial cervical vertebrae (C3–C7) were included in the study. Measurements were performed on the axial CT view of C3–C7. A virtual screw trajectory with parallel alignment to the ipsilateral lamina was placed through the LM. Potential violation of the transverse foramen was assessed and the LM width available for screw purchase measured. There was no virtual violation of the vertebral artery of C3–C7 with lamina-guided LM screw placement. LM width available for screw purchase using this technique ranged from 5.2 to 7.4 mm. The sub-axial cervical lamina is a safe reference plane for LM screw placement. LM screws placed parallel to the ipsilateral lamina find sufficient LM width and are highly unlikely to injure the vertebral artery, even in bi-cortical placement. Placing LM screws parallel to the lamina appears favourable over conventional techniques.     

When does intraoperative 3D-imaging play a role in transpedicular C2 screw placement?

IntroductionThe stabilization of an atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability is demanding due to a complex atlantoaxial anatomy with proximity to the spinal cord, a variable run of the vertebral artery (VA) and narrow C2 pedicles. We perfomed the Goel & Harms fusion in combination with an intraoperative 3D imaging to ensure correct screw placement in the C2 pedicle. We hypothesized, that narrow C2 pedicles lead to a higher malposition rate of screws by perforation of the pedicle wall. The purpose of this study was to describe a certain pedicle size, under which the perforation rate rises.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, all patients (n = 30) were operated in the Goel & Harms technique. The isthmus height and pedicle diameter of C2 were measured. The achieved screw position in C2 was evaluated according to Gertzbein & Robbin classification (GRGr).ResultsA statistically significant correlation was found between the pedicles size (isthmus height/pedicle diameter) and the achieved GRGr for the right (p = 0.002/p = 0.03) and left side (p = 0.018/p = 0.008). The ROC analysis yielded a Cut Off value for the pedicle size to distinguish between an intact or perforated pedicle wall (GRGr 1 or ≥2). The Cut-Off value was identified for the isthmus height (right 6.1 mm, left 5.4 mm) and for the pedicle diameter (6.6 mm both sides).ConclusionThe hypothesis, that narrow pedicles lead to a higher perforation rate of the pedicle wall, can be accepted. Pedicles of <6.6 mm turned out to be a risk factor for a perforation of the pedicle wall (GRGr 2 or higher). Intraoperative 3D imaging is a feasible tool to confirm optimal screw position, which becomes even more important in cases with thin pedicles. The rising risk of VA injury in these cases support the additional use of navigation.     

Axis vertebral dimensions for safe screw placement: A CT normative data analysis

IntroductionMorphometric evaluation of the pedicle and isthmus of second cervical vertebra (C2) (Axis) is extremely vital before contemplating any surgical stabilization involving the Craniovertebral region, in view of its proximity to the vertebral artery and the cervical nerve root. The dimensions of pedicles and isthmuses in C2 vary between individuals and there is paucity of data in the Indian population. This study strives to measure the average pedicle and isthmus dimensions in a sample of population, which would enable selection of screws with safest diameters to be used in C2; thereby avoiding injury to adjacent neurovascular structures.Materials and methodsOne Hundred patients in the age group between 18 and 70 years who underwent CT scan of head and neck region were included in the study. The aim of this study was to assess the anatomic suitability of transarticular and pedicle screw placement in Axis vertebrae of Indian population and determine the maximum safe diameter for screw placement. The following parameters were measured in millimeters: Pedicle width, Pedicle angle, Internal height and Isthmic height.ResultsThe Mean maximum diameter of potential pedicle screw was 4.99 ± 1.1 mm for the right side with the left side being slightly wider at 5.20 ± 1.16 mm. Twenty eight (28%; 56 out of 200 pedicles) had a measurement < 4.5 mm. The internal height in sagittal images representing the pedicle height was found to be 4.79 ± 0.96 mm on the right side and 4.75 ± 1.04 mm on the left side. Sixty five (65) out of 200 pedicles (32.5%) had measurements < 4.5 mm in sagittal plane. The Mean maximum diameter of potential Transarticular screw (outer diameter of isthmus) was 5.05 ± 0.78 mm for the right side and 5.18 ± 0.84 mm on the left side.DiscussionIsthmic height < 4.5 mm could potentially violate the vertebral foramen when a 3.5 mm screw is used. In our study 22.5% isthmuses were narrow (<4.5 mm). The mean maximum safe diameter for a potential transarticular screw in the present study was 5.11 mm. Though our patients had smaller isthmus dimensions compared with literature, 77.5% of C2 could take a 4 mm transarticular screw quite comfortably considering the 0.5 mm margin on either side. In the present study, 28% of pedicles were found to be inappropriately sized (<4.5 mm) to accommodate the standard 3.5 mm screw. The mean maximum diameter of a potential pedicle screw in our study was 5.09 mm; and in 72% of patients a 4 mm screw could be placed with confidence. Though our patients on an average can accommodate a 4 mm screw comfortably, we suggest a protocol of obtaining CT measurements of C2 prior to operative intervention for identifying those individuals at risk of neurovascular injury; 22.5% for transarticular screw and 28% for pedicle screw.     

Morphological Study of Subaxial Cervical Pedicles by Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction Image

Malpositioning of cervical screws risks neurovascular injury. A cervical screw fixation system can provide proper rigidity, alignment correction, and high rates of fusion afforded by high pullout biomechanical strength. The objective is to assess the dimensions and axis of the C3–C7 cervical pedicles. A 1-mm slice thickness computed tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine of 30 patients (15 males, 15 females) were analyzed and reconstructed in three-dimensions using Mimics^® 10.01 software. We measured pedicle axis length (PAL), pedicle and lateral mass length (PL-LM), pedicle length (PL), outer pedicle width (OPW), and pedicle transverse angle (PTA) from the axial image and outer pedicle height (OPH) and pedicle sagittal angle (PSA) from the sagittal image. The OPH and OPW at all subaxial cervical spines were suitable for insertion of 3.5 mm cervical pedicle screws. PSA was directed cranially at C3 to C5 (13.84, 7.09, and 2.71) and directed caudally at C6 and C7 (–4.55, –6.94). PTA was greatest at C5 and smallest at C7. The respective difference between the left and right side for nearly all parameters was not statistically significant (except for C6 PL and C7 OPH). Females had a significantly smaller OPH and OPW than males at nearly all levels. The PTA was not significantly different between the sexes. Cervical pedicle screw fixation in the Thai population can be safely performed and guidelines for insertion at each vertebra documented. Appropriate preoperative planning is necessary to achieve safe and accurate placement of the screws.     

New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement

Parameters of the position of the aorta in previous reports were determined for anterior surgery. This study evaluated the relative position of the aorta to the spine by new parameters, which could enhance the safety of pedicle screw placement. Three parameters were defined in a new Cartesian coordinate system. We selected an entry point of a left pedicle screw as the origin. The transverse plane was determined to include both the bases of the superior facet and to be parallel to the upper endplate of the vertebral body. A line connecting the entry points of both sides was defined as the X-axis. The angle formed by the Y-axis and a line connecting the origin and the center of the aorta was defined as the left pedicle–aorta angle. The length of a line connecting the origin and the aorta edge was defined as the left pedicle–aorta distance. Distance from the edge of the aorta to the X-axis was defined as the pedicular line–aorta distance. These parameters were measured preoperatively in 293 vertebral bodies of 24 patients with a right thoracic curve. We simulated the placement of the pedicle screw with variable length and with some direction error. We defined a warning pedicle as that when the aorta enters the expected area of the screw. Sensitivity analysis was performed to find the warning pedicle ratio in 12 scenarios. The left pedicle–aorta angle averaged 29.7° at the thoracic spine and −16.3° at the lumbar spine; the left pedicle–aorta distance averaged 23.7 and 55.2 mm; the pedicular line–aorta distance averaged 18.3 and 51.0 mm, respectively. The ratio of warning pedicles was consistently high at T4–5 and T10–12. When a left pedicle screw perforates an anterior/lateral wall of the vertebral body, the aorta may be at risk. These new parameters enable surgeons to intuitively understand the position of the aorta in surgical planning or in placement of a pedicle screw.     

Morphometric analysis using multiplanar reconstructed CT of the lumbar pedicle in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis characterized by a Cobb angle of 30° or greater

Object Although the anatomy of the thoracic pedicle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is well known, that of the lumbar pedicle in degenerative lumbar scoliosis is not. The morphometric differences between the pedicles on the concave and convex sides can result in an increased risk of malpositioned pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze the lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using multiplanar reconstructed CT. Methods The study group comprised 16 consecutive patients (1 man and 15 women, mean age 70.9 ± 4.5 years) with degenerative lumbar scoliosis characterized by a Cobb angle of at least 30° who underwent preoperative helical CT scans. The CT data in DICOM format were reconstructed, and the following parameters were measured for each pedicle inside the curves: the inner cortical transverse pedicle width (TPWi) and outer cortical transverse pedicle width (TPWo) and axial angle, all on an axial plane, and the inner cortical minimum pedicle diameter (MPDi) and outer cortical minimum pedicle diameter (MPDo) and cephalocaudal inclination of the pedicle, all on the plane perpendicular to the pedicle axis. The cortical thickness and cortical ratio of the pedicles on the axial plane and the plane perpendicular to the pedicle axis were calculated. Data were obtained for a total of 124 pedicles; L-1, 26 pedicles in 13 patients; L-2, 32 pedicles in 16 patients; L-3, 32 pedicles in 16 patients; L-4, 28 pedicles in 14 patients; and L-5, 6 pedicles in 3 patients. Results Among the target vertebrae, the TPWi, MPDi, and MPDo were significantly smaller and the axial angle was significantly larger on the concave side than on the convex side (TPWi, 6.37 vs 6.70 mm, p < 0.01; MPDi, 5.15 vs 5.67 mm, p < 0.01; MPDo, 7.91 vs 8.37 mm, p < 0.05; axial angle, 11.79° vs 10.56°, p < 0.01). The cortical ratio of the pedicles was larger on the concave side than on the convex side (on the axial plane, 0.29 vs 0.26, p < 0.05; on the plane perpendicular to the pedicle axis, 0.36 vs 0.32, p < 0.01). These differences were most evident at L-4. Conclusions This study demonstrated lumbar pedicle asymmetry in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. The authors speculate that these asymmetrical changes were attributed to the remodeling caused by axial load imbalance and the limited space available for pedicles on the concave side. On the concave side, because of the narrower pedicle diameter and larger axial angle, surgeons should carefully determine screw size and direction when inserting pedicle screws to prevent possible pedicle wall breakage and neural damage.     

Ideal starting point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement: a 3D computed tomography analysis using perioperative measurements

Background contextC2 pedicle screws provide stable fixation for posterior cervical fusion. Placing C2 pedicle screws is fraught with risks, and a misplaced screw can result in cortical breach of the pedicle, resulting in injury to the vertebral artery or spinal cord.PurposeWe sought to identify a reproducible starting point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging. Our aims included identifying correct cephalad and mediolateral angles used for determining the most accurate trajectory through the C2 pedicle.Study designA radiographic analysis of the anatomy of the C2 pedicle using CT.Patient sampleA random sample of 34 cervical spine CT scans in patients without medical or surgical pathology of the cervical spine.Outcome measuresNormal anatomic measurements made in the axial and sagittal planes of the CT scans. Angles and measures in millimeters were recorded.MethodsThe C2 pedicles were evaluated using CT scanning with a 3D imaging application. The ideal trajectory through each pedicle was plotted. The mediolateral and cephalad angles were measured using the midline sagittal plane and the inferior vertebral body border as references. Other measurements made were the distances through the pedicle and vertebral bodies, and the surface distances along the laminae between the isthmus and the starting point of the chosen trajectories. Other measurements involving the height of the laminae were also made. The mean values, standard deviations, and intraobserver variations are presented.ResultsCT scans from 34 patients were reviewed. The sex of the patient did not predict angle measurements (p=.2038), so combined male and female patient measures are presented. The mean mediolateral angle measured was 29.2°, and the mean cephalad angle was 23.0°. The mean distance along the lamina surface between the isthmus and the starting point was 8.1 mm. The mean distance from the superior border of the lamina to the starting point was 5.7 mm. There were no statistically significant differences between the dataset collected in duplicate by the same observer (p=.74); as such, we present one data analysis on combined data from the two datasets collected.ConclusionIt is possible to determine an ideal trajectory through the C2 pedicle. These measurements may facilitate C2 pedicle screw fixation decreasing the risk of injury to the vertebral artery, spinal cord, or nerve roots. Delineating the individual anatomy in each case with imaging before surgery is recommended.     

下颈椎经椎弓根螺钉内固定相关解剖学观察

目的为下颈椎经椎弓根螺钉内固定提供应用解剖学基础及形态学资料。方法应用游标卡尺和量角器对24具成人颈椎干燥标本C3~7椎弓根的高度、宽度、骨性椎管长度、轴线长度、内外侧皮质厚度及轴线夹角进行解剖学测量,并分别计算各节段左右侧椎弓根测量值的均值和标准差,进行统计学分析。结果C3~7椎弓根的椎弓根最窄处截面上下皮质骨高度(PH)和松质骨高度(PSH)分别为4.21mm和7.64mm,宽度分别为3.64mm和5.88mm;轴线长度、骨性椎管长度及侧块部长度分别为15.75mm、32.20mm及8.12mm;最狭窄处内、外侧皮质厚度为0.68mm和1.65mm;椎弓根轴线与矢状线在水平面上的夹角C3:47.12°±3.05°、C4:43.47°±1.49°、C5:40.15±2.58°、C6:38.55°±2.45°、C7:35.16°±2.10°;椎弓根轴线与水平面间夹角C3:8.50°±2.50°、C4:4.83°±1.65°、C5:1.25°±1.45°、C6:-(4.50°±2.50°)、C7:-(8.50°±2.50°)。结论本实验实体测量数据与国内外数据无显著差异,但发现颈椎椎弓根解剖形态个体变异程度较大,术前必须对置钉椎体进行CT、X线片检查,确定适合个体的进钉点、进钉方向、螺钉直径及长度等。颈椎椎弓根螺钉技术仍然是一种相对安全、固定可靠的手术方法。     

Pedicle screw fixation of the C7 vertebra using an anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging technique

Cervical pedicle screws have been reported to be biomechanically superior to lateral mass screws. However, placement of these implants is a technical challenge. The purpose of this investigation was to use an anatomic and a clinical study to evaluate a technique for placement of the pedicle screws in the C7 vertebra using fluoroscopic imaging in only the anteroposterior (A/P) plane. Ten adult cadaver C7 vertebrae were used to record the pedicle width, inclination and a suitable entry point for placement of pedicle screws. A prospective study of 28 patients undergoing posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with C7 pedicle screw placement was also performed. A total of 55 C7 pedicle screws were placed using imaging only in the A/P plane with screw trajectory values obtained by the anatomic study. Radiographs and CT scans were performed post-operatively. The average posterior pedicle diameter of C7 vertebra was 9.5 ± 1.2 mm in this study. The average middle pedicle diameter was 7.1 mm and the average anterior pedicle diameter was 9.2 mm. The average transverse pedicle angle was 26.8 on the right and 27.3 on the left. CT scans were obtained on 20 of 28 patients which showed two asymptomatic cortical wall perforations. One screw penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle and another displayed an anterior vertebral penetration. There were no medial wall perforations. The preliminary results suggest that this technique is safe and suitable for pedicle screw placement in the C7 vertebra.     

中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根形态学三维CT分析

目的 总结中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根形态学特点,与其他人种特发性脊柱侧凸患者胸椎椎弓根形态比较,为手术中胸椎安全置钉提供参考.方法 回顾性分析2007年7月至2012年6月期间56例于我院行术前CT扫描三维重建的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(右胸弯)患者的资料,男10例,女46例;年龄10～18岁,平均14.8岁.Lenke分型:Ⅰ型28例、Ⅱ型12例、Ⅲ型14例、Ⅳ型2例.术前主胸弯Cobb角平均为55°(36°～90°).测量其胸椎两侧椎弓根在矢状面、冠状面、轴面的置钉长度、椎弓根宽度及角度等形态学指标,总结其变化规律,并与文献报道的其他人种数据进行对比.结果 主胸弯顶椎区凹侧椎弓根宽度小于凸侧,椎弓根置钉长度大于凸侧,椎弓根尾倾角度小于凸侧.椎弓根矢状面宽度自头端向尾端逐渐增加,平均值范围为0.68～1.36 cm;轴面椎弓根宽度平均值范围为0.30～0.70 cm.冠状面椎弓根最小径略小于轴面椎弓根宽度,平均值范围为0.28～0.67 cm.结论 与欧美人种相比,中国特发性脊柱侧凸患者椎弓根宽度较小.顶椎区凹侧置钉难度大、风险高,建议使用直径3.5 mm椎弓根螺钉或采用极外侧置钉法.     

The feasibility of transpedicular screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the Arab population: a computed tomography-based morphometric study

Background

Transpedicular screw fixation of the cervical spine provides excellent biomechanical stability. The feasibility of inserting a 3.5-mm screw in the pedicle requires a minimum pedicle diameter of 4.5 mm. This diameter allows at least 0.5 mm bony bridge medially and laterally in order to avoid pedicle violation which can result in neurovascular complications. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of this technique in Arab people since no data are available about this population.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective review of computed tomography scans of normal cervical spines of 99 Arab adults. Ten morphometric measurements were obtained. Data were analyzed using a p value of ≤0.05 as the cut-off level of statistical significance.

Results

Our sample included 63 (63.6 %) males and 36 (36.4 %) females, with a mean age of 35.5 ± 16.5 years. The morphometric parameters of C3–C7 spine pedicles were larger in males than in females. The outer pedicle width (OPW) was <4.5 mm in >25 % of all subjects at C3–C6 vertebrae. Statistically significant differences in the OPW between males and females were noted at C3 (p = 0.032) and C6 (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Inserting pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine is feasible among the majority of Arab people.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

     

Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation

The objective of this cadaveric study is to determine the safety and outcome of thoracic pedicle screw placement in Asians using the funnel technique. Pedicle screws have superior biomechanical as well as clinical data when compared to other methods of instrumentation. However, misplacement in the thoracic spine can result in major neurological implications. There is great variability of the thoracic pedicle morphometry between the Western and the Asian population. The feasibility of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asians has not been fully elucidated yet. A pre-insertion radiograph was performed and surgeons were blinded to the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via a wide laminectomy. The narrowest pedicles are found between T3 and T6. T5 pedicle width is smallest measuring 4.1 ± 1.3 mm. There were 24 (10.0%) Grade 1 perforations and only 1 (0.4%) Grade 2 perforation. Grade 2 or worse perforation is considered significant perforation which would threaten the neural structures. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to medial perforations. 48.0% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3 pedicles. Pedicle fracture occurred in 10.4% of pedicles. Intra-operatively, the absence of funnel was found in 24.5% of pedicles. In conclusion, thoracic pedicle screws using 5.0 mm at T1–T6 and 6.0 mm at T7–T12 can be inserted safely in Asian cadavers using the funnel technique despite having smaller thoracic pedicle morphometry.