Marginalization and symbolic violence in a world of differences: war and parallels to nursing practice

Abstract Marginalization has been used as a guiding concept for nursing research, theory and practice. Its properties have been identified and updated in 1994 and 1999, respectively. This article re‐examines marginalization, considering it to be a concept that changes with pivotal historical events. The events of September 11, 2001, and the war between the US/UK and Iraq are such pivotal events. The notion of the linguistic habitus and symbolic violence as outlined by Bourdieu provide new insights about the dynamics of marginalization. Specifically noted is the marginalization of persons and cultures based on their designation by the current US administration, and as interpreted through mainstream media, as actual or potential ‘terrorists’. A parallel situation in nursing is discussed, beginning with nursing's own marginality, related to the dynamics of symbolic violence. Nursing is argued to be vulnerable to having essential words and practices co‐opted by dominant institutions and altered in meaning, that is, made incongruent with the discipline's emphasis on core values of confidentiality, equity and care. In response to marginalization and exteriorization those affected can use voice and testimony to ‘recreate the centre’. Suggestions for protecting our practices and philosophy are included.     

现行论文作者署名制度存在的问题及对策建议

【目的】 梳理归纳现行论文作者署名制度存在的主要问题并提出相应的对策。【方法】 采用网络调查法、文献调研法,从科技期刊、科研管理机构、资助机构及研究人员等视角对现行论文作者署名制度进行分析。【结果】 作者署名制度存在作者身份标准缺乏统一性、作者贡献揭示程度低、未能涵盖所有的贡献角色等问题,可以从建立通用的作者身份标准、采用CRediT贡献分类法、与ORCID建立关联、建立健全科研评价指标体系四个方面进行补充完善。【结论】 提高作者贡献的透明性和可获取性,为研究人员的职称评定、绩效考核、项目申请等提供基于具体贡献的评价指标。