The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff disease is uncommon in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Consequently, the prognostic implications of rotator cuff disease in patients undergoing prosthetic replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to report the effects of the condition of the supraspinatus tendon and the rotator cuff musculature on the results of shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-five shoulders in 514 patients who had an arthroplasty for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis as part of a multicenter study were evaluated. Forty-one shoulders had a partial-thickness tear of the supraspinatus, and forty-two had a full-thickness tear. Ninety shoulders had moderate (stage-2) fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus, and nineteen had severe (stage-3 or 4) degeneration. Eighty-four shoulders had moderate fatty degeneration of the subscapularis, and fifteen had severe degeneration. The influence of the condition of the supraspinatus tendon and the infraspinatus and subscapularis musculature on the postoperative outcome was evaluated with respect to the scores according to the system of Constant and Murley, active mobility, subjective satisfaction, radiographic result, and rate of complications. RESULTS: The shoulders were evaluated at a mean of 43.1 months postoperatively. With the numbers available, supraspinatus tears were not found to influence the postoperative outcome with respect to the total Constant score, active mobility, subjective satisfaction, radiographic result, or rate of complications. Additionally, the treatment of these tears did not markedly influence the outcome parameters. Conversely, both shoulders with moderate fatty degeneration and those with severe degeneration of the infraspinatus were associated with poorer results than those with no degeneration with respect to the total Constant score (p < 0.0005), active external rotation (p < 0.0005), active forward flexion (p = 0.001), and subjective satisfaction (p = 0.031). Similar although less dramatic results were seen with fatty degeneration of the subscapularis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that minimally retracted or nonretracted rotator cuff tears that are limited to the supraspinatus tendon do not appreciably affect most shoulder-specific outcome parameters in shoulder arthroplasty performed for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. Conversely, fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus and, less importantly, subscapularis musculature adversely affects many of these parameters.     

A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study

Six hundred one total shoulder arthroplasties and eighty-nine hemiarthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patients were evaluated with a physical examination, Constant score, and radiographic evaluation. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. At follow-up, the Constant score averaged 64 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 86%, active anterior elevation averaged 130 degrees, and active external rotation averaged 36 degrees for the hemiarthroplasties. The Constant score averaged 70 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 96%, active anterior elevation averaged 145 degrees, and active external rotation averaged 42 degrees for the total shoulder arthroplasties. Eighty-six percent of hemiarthroplasties and ninety-four percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had good or excellent results. Differences were statistically significant for all parameters. Total shoulder arthroplasty provided better scores for pain, mobility, and activity than hemiarthroplasty. Fifty-six percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had a radiolucent line around the glenoid component. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides results superior to those of hemiarthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis.     

Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: A systematic review

Rotator cuff tears have been reported to be uncommon following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Postoperative rotator cuff tears can lead to pain, proximal humeral migration, and glenoid component loosening. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the incidence of post-TSA rotator cuff tears or dysfunction in osteoarthritic patients. A systematic review of multiple databases was performed using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Levels I-IV evidence clinical studies of patients with primary osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Fifteen studies with 1259 patients (1338 shoulders) were selected. Student''s t-tests were used with a significant alpha value of 0.05. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in motion and validated clinical outcome scores (P < 0.001). Radiographic humeral head migration was the most commonly reported data point for extrapolation of rotator cuff integrity. After 6.6 ± 3.1 years, 29.9 ± 20.7% of shoulders demonstrated superior humeral head migration and 17.9 ± 14.3% migrated a distance more than 25% of the head. This was associated with an 11.3 ± 7.9% incidence of postoperative superior cuff tears. The incidence of radiographic anterior humeral head migration was 11.9 ± 15.9%, corresponding to a 3.0 ± 13.6% rate of subscapularis tears. We found an overall 1.2 ± 4.5% rate of reoperation for cuff injury. Nearly all studies reported indirect markers of rotator cuff dysfunction, such as radiographic humeral head migration and clinical exam findings. This systematic review suggests that rotator cuff dysfunction following TSA may be more common than previously reported. IV, systematic review of Levels I-IV studies.     

The role of concomitant biceps tenodesis in shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicentric study

This study evaluated the effects of concomitant biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Six hundred eighty-eight shoulders that had undergone replacement for primary glenohumeral arthritis were reviewed at a mean 43 months postoperatively. One hundred twenty-one patients had undergone a biceps tenodesis at arthroplasty, while the remaining patients did not. Tenodesis was significantly better than no tenodesis in most outcome parameters. No difference was found between the groups in complication rate. Biceps tenodesis is a useful adjunct to shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis.     

A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff

Prospective pain relief and functional outcome data were obtained on 65 shoulder arthroplasties in 55 patients. Thirty-seven total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) and twenty-eight hemiarthroplasties were followed up for a mean of 4.3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean age was 63 years. Pain scores on a visual analog scale improved from a preoperative mean of 64 to 12 postoperatively. TSA and hemiarthroplasty postoperative scores did not differ significantly, but TSA patients started with a worse preoperative score and improved more. Five other visual analog scale scores improved, including function and quality of life. There were similar relationships between TSAs and hemiarthroplasties in each instance (poorer preoperative scores and more improvement). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score Index improved from 39 to 88 with surgery. The hemiarthroplasty group improved from a mean of 42 to 84, and the TSA group improved from 37 to 91. Although the numerical differences were small, the superiority of TSAs with regard to final score and rate of improvement was statistically significant. Patients with the poorest preoperative scores improved the most, regardless of prosthesis type. Mean active forward elevation improved from 100 degrees to 147 degrees, external rotation improved from a mean of 7 degrees to 39 degrees, and internal rotation improved by a mean of 3 spinal segments. These measures did not differ between TSA and hemiarthroplasty patients. One implant failure was treated with revision from TSA to hemiarthroplasty. Radiographic parameters characterizing component position and offset were measured, but none was found to predict outcome. The results suggest a modest superiority of TSA over hemiarthroplasty in the medium term. Because both TSA and hemiarthroplasty provide considerable and nearly comparable improvement, the long-term risks of glenoid wear and loosening need to be clearly defined before a definitive conclusion can be reached regarding the differential indications for these two procedures.     

Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a metaanalysis

The current study systematically reviews the literature describing patient outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasties using conventional global hip score ratings. Two thousand one hundred thirty-seven English-language articles published from 1966 through 2000 were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. A three-step filter process was used to identify articles to be included in the metaanalysis. Forty-two articles with 2578 patients had data abstracted for the analysis. Metaanalysis of global hip scores was done using a fixed effects model with the assumption that the variances of each measurement were identical across studies. Thirty-nine articles reporting on 46 cohorts progressed through three filters and went to data extraction and analysis. Revision total hip arthroplasty is a reasonably safe and effective procedure for failed hip replacement Based on this exploratory analysis revision hip procedures seem to have comparable longevity, to primary hip replacement but appear to have slightly lower functional outcome (as measured by global hip scores), and slightly higher morbidity and mortality rates than primary procedures. Inconsistent reporting in the original studies limited exploration of other factors that may have affected outcomes.     

Characterizing the functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: Both shoulder surgeons and patients who are considering total shoulder arthroplasty are interested in the anticipated improvement in shoulder comfort and function after the procedure. The purpose of the present study was to characterize shoulder-specific functional gains in relation to preoperative shoulder function and to present this information in a way that can be easily communicated to patients who are considering this surgery. METHODS: We analyzed the preoperative and follow-up shoulder function in patients managed with total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Functional self-assessments were available for 102 (80%) of 128 shoulders after thirty to sixty months of follow-up. Outcome was assessed with respect to the change in the number of shoulder functions that were performable, the change in shoulder function as a percentage of the preoperative functional deficit, and the change in the ability to perform specific shoulder functions. RESULTS: The average number of shoulder functions that were performable improved from four of twelve preoperatively to nine of twelve postoperatively (p < 0.01). Function improved in ninety-six shoulders (94%). The number of functions that were performable at the time of follow-up was positively associated with preoperative shoulder function (p < 0.05): the better the preoperative function, the better the follow-up function. The improvement in function was greatest for shoulders with less preoperative function (p < 0.01). On the average, patients regained approximately two-thirds of the functions that had been absent preoperatively. Significant improvement was noted in eleven of the twelve shoulder functions that were examined (p < 0.01). The chance of regaining a function that had been absent before surgery was 73%, whereas the chance of losing a function that had been present before surgery was 6%. Older men tended to have greater functional improvement than younger men. CONCLUSION: Total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis significantly improves shoulder function. Postoperative function is related to preoperative function. The improvement that was observed in this clinical series can be conveyed to patients most simply by stating that, after surgery, shoulders typically regained approximately two-thirds of the functions that had been absent preoperatively.     

Heterotopic ossification after primary shoulder arthroplasty

We have assessed the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) after primary shoulder joint replacement in 126 shoulders; 58 patients had hemiarthroplasty, and 68 had total shoulder joint replacement. HO developed to a minor extent in 15% of patients (19/126). There was no statistical difference between hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder replacement or between male and female patients. Patients with cuff tear arthropathy were the only group with an increased risk (36.4% [4/11]) of having HO develop. In patients with osteoarthritis, fractures, or rheumatoid arthritis, HO occurred in less than 14.5% (15/115). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) did not appear to have any effect on HO as in hip replacement, as HO developed in 15.15% of patients having NSAIDs postoperatively and in 15.05% of patients without NSAIDs. Prophylaxis of HO with NSAIDs seems only to be indicated in patients with cuff tear arthropathy.     

Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND: The results of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis have been reported to be excellent or good for the majority of patients, but the value of using a glenoid component and the anatomic factors that affect outcome are still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of an operatively confirmed full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff, the severity of preoperative erosion of glenoid bone, preoperative radiographic evidence of subluxation of the humeral head, and the severity of preoperative loss of the passive range of motion on the outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. METHODS: In a multicenter clinical outcome study, we evaluated 128 shoulders in 118 patients with primary osteoarthritis who had been followed for a mean of forty-six months (range, twenty-four to eighty-seven months). RESULTS: Patients with <10 degrees of passive external rotation preoperatively had significantly less improvement in external rotation after hemiarthroplasty (p = 0.006). Thirteen (10%) of the 128 shoulders had a repairable full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon, but these tears did not affect the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the decrease in pain, or patient satisfaction. Severe or moderate eccentric glenoid erosion was seen in twenty-nine (23%) of the 128 shoulders, and total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in significantly better passive total elevation and active external rotation as well as a trend toward significantly better active forward flexion than did hemiarthroplasty in these shoulders. The humeral head was subluxated posteriorly in twenty-three shoulders (18%), and when they were compared with the other shoulders in the study, these shoulders were found to have lower final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, more pain, and decreased active external rotation following either total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our data, we recommend the use of a glenoid component in shoulders with glenoid erosion. Humeral head subluxation was associated with a less favorable result regardless of the type of shoulder arthroplasty and must be considered in preoperative planning and counseling. Severe loss of the passive range of motion preoperatively was associated with a decreased passive range of motion postoperatively. A repairable tear of the supraspinatus tendon is not a contraindication to the use of a glenoid component. .     

Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review to describe patient outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision procedures using various global knee score ratings. English language articles published from 1966 through 2000 were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. A multistage assessment was used to determine the articles containing data that could meet our objective. Meta-analyses of global knee scores were undertaken using a fixed effects model with the assumption that the variances of each individual measurement were identical across studies. The initial inclusion criteria were met by 58 articles with a total of 1965 patients. There were 42 articles comprising 45 unique patient cohorts and a total of 1515 patients that had sufficient global knee score data for analysis and were used in the meta-analyses. Revision total knee arthroplasty is an effective procedure for failed knee arthroplasties based on global knee rating scales.     

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: better clinical midterm outcome after primary reverse arthroplasty versus secondary reverse arthroplasty after failed ORIF in the elderly

BackgroundJoint replacement surgery as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures is an established option, especially in the elderly. In light of the increased attention to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), this study has analyzed the outcomes of patients with primary reverse arthroplasty and after secondary reverse arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 57 patients with an average age of 76 years (min. 55; max. 94; SD 7) from 2010 and 2015 who underwent primary rTSA (30) and secondary rTSA after the failure of plate osteosynthesis (27) after proximal humeral fractures. The functional outcome of the operated shoulder was evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Score, ASES, DASH and Oxford), range of motion (RoM), pain and activity level.ResultsPrimary rTSA had a significantly better functional outcome, mean-follow-up 37.3 months, measured by Constant-Score (57.13 vs 45.78 points; p= .015) compared to secondary RTSA, mean follow-up 42.1 months. A significantly better active abduction (P= .002), forward flexion (P = .003) and internal rotation (P = .037) was observed in the primary rTSA group, especially in the follow-up > 35 months.ConclusionReverse shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for proximal humeral fractures as primary or revision surgery. The reliable clinical outcome especially in the follow-up to 40 months after primary reverse arthroplasty may suggest to prefer rTSA for complex humeral fractures in the elderly.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective comparative study     

Defining maximal outcome improvement thresholds for patient satisfaction after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study

BackgroundPrevious research has investigated the percentage of maximal outcome improvement (MOI) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Simple Shoulder Test scores after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA); however, few other outcome scores have been validated. The purpose of this study was to establish thresholds of MOI percentage for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and subjective Constant-Murley (Constant) scores associated with patient satisfaction at 2 years following rTSA.MethodsA retrospective review of institutional registry data for all patients who underwent primary rTSA between 09/2016 and 02/2018 was performed. All patients completed the ASES, SANE, and Constant outcome measures preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Changes were assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. MOI percentage was defined as the score improvement from baseline divided by the highest possible improvement from baseline based on the maximum value of the outcome score used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine optimal MOI percentage thresholds associated with postoperative satisfaction. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with achieving the MOI.ResultsA total of 105 patients were included in the final analysis, with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 70.0 ± 7.5 years and BMI of 28.9 ± 5.6 kg/m². The majority of patients were satisfied postoperatively (81.0%). Statistically significant increases were observed from baseline to 2 years postoperatively for the outcome measures assessed (P < .001 for all). ROC analysis demonstrated that the optimal MOI percentage threshold for achieving satisfaction was 66.9% for ASES ([Area under curve, AUC]: 0.87), 71.0% for SANE (AUC: 0.89), and 37.5% for Constant (AUC: 0.85). The linear regression model fit between the proportion of satisfied patients and the calculated MOI percentages was moderate for SANE (r² = 0.313, P < .001) and weak for Constant (r² = 0.228, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that comorbid diabetes was associated with a decreased likelihood of MOI achievement for SANE ([Odds Ratio, OR]: 0.66, P = .020) and Constant (OR: 0.72, P = .027). Preoperative diagnosis of rotator cuff arthropathy (OR: 0.84, P = 0.049) was associated with a decreased likelihood of MOI achievement for Constant. No factors were significantly associated with MOI achievement for ASES.ConclusionAchieving 66.9%, 71.0%, and 37.5% of the MOI for the ASES, SANE, and Constant scores is associated with postoperative satisfaction following rTSA. Comorbid diabetes and diagnosis of rotator cuff arthropathy were significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of MOI achievement.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Case Series (Prognostic)