The use of diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography in the assessment of pancreatic cancer

Background: Pancreatic resection with curative intent is possible in a select minority of patients with carcinomas of the pancreatic head. Diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography combines the proven benefits of staging laparoscopy with high-resolution intraoperative ultrasound, thus allowing the surgeon to perform a detailed assessment of the pancreatic cancer. Methods: In a prospective study of 26 patients with obstructive jaundice from a carcinoma of the head of the pancreas, the curative resectability of tumors was assessed by ultrasound (26 cases), computerized tomography (26 cases), endoscopic ultrasound (16 cases), and a combination of diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound (26 cases). Results: The findings of ultrasound and computerized tomography were comparable: 50% of patients were excluded from curative resection. Endoscopic ultrasound provided precise information on the primary tumors. The accuracy of the combined diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound, when compared with ultrasound, computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound, was better with respect to minute peritoneal or hepatic metastasis: 80.7% (or a further 30.7%) of patients did not qualify for curative resection. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy supported by laparoscopic ultrasonography enables detection of previously unsuspected metastases; thus, needless laparotomy can be avoided. It should therefore be considered the first step in any potentially curative surgical procedure. Received: 12 April 1997/Accepted 30 April 1998     

腹腔镜在胰腺肿瘤诊断和分期中的价值

目的:总结胰腺肿瘤剖腹手术前先行腹腔镜探查的价值。方法:对12例经B超和CT诊断或怀疑为胰腺肿瘤的病人,在剖腹手术前先行腹腔镜探查,其中2例联合使用腹腔镜超声检查(LUS)。结果:1例CT诊断疑为胰头肿瘤伴少量腹水者,腹腔镜明确为原发性腹膜炎,作冲洗引流而愈。2例影像学检查见胰体尾增厚,怀疑胰腺肿瘤者,腹腔镜检查未见明显异常,再作LUS检查,1例为胰腺囊肿,另1例未见异常。9例腹腔镜检查确诊为胰腺恶性肿瘤病人中,3例明确已有远处转移,从而避免了开腹;另6例腹腔镜探查提示可以切除,结果其中1例由于肠系膜血管被肿瘤包绕而无法切除,余5例(5/9=55.6%)进行了根治性切除。腹腔镜探查在评估胰腺癌不可切除性的敏感性为75%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为83.3%。结论:腹腔镜探查可发现影像学检查不能发现的腹膜转移,结合腹腔镜超声检查可提高胰腺肿瘤诊断、分期的准确性,使部分病人避免了不必要的剖腹手术。     

The impact of laparoscopy on cancer management

Surgical Endoscopy -     

Diagnostic and interventional laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasonography in the management of pancreatic disease

The laparoscopic management of pancreatic disorders has evolved dramatically from its inception in 1911 and its rediscovery in the 1970s. Although investigators once proclaimed that "it seems unlikely that laparoscopy will have any more than an extremely limited use in the investigation of pancreatic disorders," laparoscopy and LUS now have a well-recognized role in the staging of pancreatic cancer and an increasing part in the management of benign pancreatic disease at many institutions. Although the appropriate role of LS and LUS is debatable, the development and refinement of laparoscopic techniques and instrumentation and the improvement of noninvasive diagnostic modalities will provide new data, increase the rate of resection at laparotomy, and allow surgeons to treat a broader range of pancreatic disease by minimally invasive methods. The value of LS and LUS for benign and malignant pancreatic disorders has been clearly demonstrated, but the inevitable issues of hospital resource, operative expertise, and surgical philosophy will ultimately determine the role of laparoscopy and LUS in clinical practice.     

Early experience of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the management of pancreatic carcinoma

Summary A 7.5-MHz linear array ultrasound probe has been developed for the evaluation of solid organs at laparoscopy. Twelve patients with suspected carcinoma of the head of the pancreas, considered at initial investigation to have resectable disease, were submitted to laparoscopy. In 4 patients, diagnostic laparoscopy revealed hepatic metastases (4 patients), peritoneal dissemination of tumor (2), and malignant ascites (1). Laparoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated hepatic metastases in four patients and hepatic cysts in two further patients. Ultrasound evaluation of the pancreas revealed lymphadenopathy (4 patients), local infiltration (2), and portal vein displacement or invasion (4). An anomalous right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery was identified in one patient. Overall, laparoscopy identified advanced disease in four patients. Laparoscopic ultrasonography, while detecting advanced disease in a further two patients, predicted resectable disease in six patients (50%). Only one of the six patients submitted to laparotomy was found to have irresectable disease due to lymph-node metastases. Laparoscopic ultrasound examination of the pancreas and liver has improved the early staging of pancreatic carcinoma and should be undertaken at an early stage in the management of such patients.     

Carcinoma of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Tumor staging with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: The authors performed a prospective evaluation of staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography in predicting surgical resectability in patients with carcinomas of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreatic resection with curative intent is possible in a select minority of patients who have carcinomas of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Patient selection is important to plan appropriate therapy and avoid unnecessary laparotomy in patients with unresectable disease. Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a novel technique that combines the proven benefits of staging laparoscopy with high resolution intraoperative ultrasound of the liver and pancreas, but which has yet to be evaluated critically in the staging of pancreatic malignancy. METHODS: A cohort of 40 consecutive patients referred to a tertiary referral center and with a diagnosis of potentially resectable pancreatic or periampullary cancer underwent staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography. The diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy alone and in conjunction with laparoscopic ultrasonography was evaluated in predicting tumor resectability (absence of peritoneal or liver metastases; absence of malignant regional lymphadenopathy; tumor confined to pancreatic head or periampullary region). RESULTS: "Occult" metastatic lesions were demonstrated by staging laparoscopy in 14 patients (35%). Laparoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated factors confirming unresectable tumor in 23 patients (59%), provided staging information in addition to that of laparoscopy alone in 20 patients (53%), and changed the decision regarding tumor resectability in 10 patients (25%). Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography was more specific and accurate in predicting tumor resectability than laparoscopy alone (88% and 89% versus 50% and 65%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Staging laparoscopy is indispensable in the detection of "occult" intra-abdominal metastases. Laparoscopic ultrasonography improves the accuracy of laparoscopic staging in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic and periampullary carcinomas.     

腹腔镜超声扫描在判断胰头癌切除中的价值

目的　探讨腹腔镜及其超声扫描技术 (LUS)在判断胰头癌可切除中的价值。方法　对2 2例临床已确诊为胰头癌的病人在剖腹探查手术前 ,采用腹腔镜超声进行前瞻性的肿瘤分期 ,明确肝、腹膜有无微小转移 ,有无局部的血管侵犯 (门静脉、肠系膜上动静脉、主动脉及下腔静脉 )。结果　本组发现肝表面及腹膜转移癌灶 3例 ,肝内转移灶 1例 ,超声引导穿刺证实为胰腺炎 1例 ,从而避免了开腹手术 ,余 17例中 8例发现腹腔、腹膜后及网膜有肿大淋巴结与局部血管或肿瘤本身与局部血管有侵犯 ,其中 2例发现门静脉血栓 ,余 9例提示可以手术切除。 17例病人进行剖腹探查 ,8例成功进行胰十二指肠切除术。结论　腹腔镜超声扫描可以较为准确的判断胰头癌切除的可能性 ,有望成为胰头癌剖腹探查术前有效的检查方法     

The evolving influence of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

With the recent introduction of laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and laparoscopic/open radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the role of preoperative laparoscopic staging may be expanded. The objective of this study was to determine the role of preoperative laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography (USG) in patients with HCC.

Methods

From January 2001 to April 2007, a cohort of 122 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of potentially resectable HCC underwent staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic USG before performing a major laparotomy in a tertiary referral center. The patients' data were collected prospectively. We have retrospectively analyzed the effect of implementation of this staging technique in our center.

Results

Preoperative laparoscopy and laparoscopic USG was successful in 119 patients (97.5%). Forty-four patients were found to be unresectable after laparoscopic staging, whereas 2 patients were found to be unresectable after exploratory laparotomy. The total number of patients who underwent curative liver resection was 73 (laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, 22 patients; open partial hepatectomy, 51 patients). The median hospital stay of the laparoscopic liver resection group was significantly shorter than that of the open resection group (8 vs 13 d; P = .002). Intraoperative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, including local ablative therapy, or combined liver resection and local ablative therapy, was performed in 27 of 45 inoperable patients (60%) (laparoscopic approach, 8 patients; open approach, 19 patients). The median hospital stay of the laparoscopic treatment group was significantly shorter than for the open treatment group for patients with unresectable HCC (5 vs 7 d; P = .003). In this study, a laparoscopic treatment approach for HCC was performed in 25.2% of the study population.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy and laparoscopic USG have a significant effect both on identifying surgically untreatable disease and in selecting the optimal treatment strategy. Some patients will benefit from a laparoscopic therapy approach. Therefore, it argues for more widespread use in laparoscopic staging procedures for patients with potentially resectable HCC.     

TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer by laparoscopic ultrasonography

Background: Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) is an imaging modality that combines laparoscopy and ultrasonography. The purpose of this prospective blinded study was to evaluate the TNM stage and assessment of resectability by LUS in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Of the 71 consecutive patients admitted to our department, 36 were excluded from the study, mainly due to evident signs of metastatic disease or another condition that would preclude surgery. Thus, a total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent abdominal CT scan, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), diagnostic laparoscopy, and LUS. Histopathologic examination was considered to be the final evaluation for LUS in all but three patients, where EUS was used as the reference. Results: The accuracy of LUS in T staging was 29/33 (80%); in N staging it was 22/34 (76%); in M staging, it was 23/34 (68%); and in overall TNM staging, it was 23/34 (68%). In assessment of nonresectability, distant metastases, and lymph node metastases, the sensitivity was 0.86, 0.43 and 0.67, respectively, for LUS alone. Combining the information gleaned from laparoscopy and LUS, the accuracy in finding nonresectable tumors was 89%. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy with LUS is highly accurate in TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer and should be considered an important modality in the assessment algorithm. Received: 6 July 1998/Accepted: 13 October 1998     

The effect of laparoscopy on survival in pancreatic cancer

HYPOTHESIS: Exposure to laparoscopy influences survival in patients with unresected pancreatic cancer who have a diagnostic or staging surgical procedure. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database to identify a cohort of persons 65 years and older, who were newly diagnosed with primary pancreatic cancer between 1991 and 1996 and who had a diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy during the course of their disease. Patients with a prior malignancy and those who had a pancreatic resection were excluded. We used proportional-hazards regression to adjust risk estimates for demographic factors, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and the use of other treatment modalities. RESULTS: We identified 112 individuals with pancreatic cancer who had a laparoscopic procedure and 791 who had only conventional surgery. More patients who had laparoscopic surgery had distant metastases at diagnosis (67.9% vs 41.2%; P =.001). Median duration of survival in the laparoscopic surgery group was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-6.8) compared with 5.3 months in the group that had only open surgery (95% CI, 4.9-5.6; P =.83). Compared with patients who only had a laparotomy, patients who had laparoscopic surgery did not have an increased rate of death when adjusted for the effects of age, sex, tumor size, grade, the presence of nodal and distant metastases at diagnosis, and the use of radiation, chemotherapy, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and biliary and gastric bypass (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40). CONCLUSION: Exposure to laparoscopic surgery did not adversely affect survival in a cohort of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer who had a diagnostic procedure but no pancreatic resection.     

Staging of gastric cancer: a study with spiral computed tomography, ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography

In this study, we evaluated and compared the value of spiral computed tomography, transabdominal ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography in staging gastric cancer in 37 patients; there was a special interest in the additional information provided by laparoscopic ultrasonography. Although laparoscopy was unreliable or hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients, the benefit of laparoscopy for staging was evident especially for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis that was missed by the other diagnostic modalities. Laparoscopic ultrasonography did not change the stage of the disease nor the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy for any of the patients. The decision whether to proceed with laparotomy was correctly predicted in 95% of the cases.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography optimize the staging and resectability of intraabdominal neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Despite technical improvements, preoperative imaging studies often fail to predict intraoperative findings. We investigated the potential use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) and laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) for the assessment of disease in patients with abdominal neoplasms. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with abdominal neoplasms underwent spiral computed tomography with oral and intravenous contrast using 5-mm contiguous sections. In addition, eight patients underwent ultrasonography, six underwent magnetic resonance imaging, and eight underwent positron emission tomography. All patients then underwent DL and LUS using a 7.5-MHz ultrasound probe. RESULTS: There were 29 men and 21 women with a mean age of 63 years (range, 35-84). Most had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (19 cases), melanoma (12 cases), or hepatoma (five cases). In nine cases (18%), DL revealed peritoneal metastatic implants not shown on preoperative images. In 18 cases (36%), LUS was more accurate than preoperative imaging. Combined DL and LUS findings radically changed the operative management in 16 patients (32%). CONCLUSION: As compared with preoperative imaging, the combination of DL and LUS provides more accurate information regarding staging and resectability. Moreover, it helps to determine the extent of operation and reduces the number of unnecessary laparotomies. DL and LUS should be used as an adjunct to preoperative imaging studies in patients with primary or metastatic intraabdominal neoplasms.     

Peroperative time-motion analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Advanced technology is being introduced rapidly into laparoscopic procedures, frequently without an accurate evaluation of its functioning. In this study, standardized time-motion analysis was applied to evaluate the peroperative surgical process and the technical equipment used in 18 cases of diagnostic laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography (DLLU). METHODS: The image through the laparoscope, the ultrasonograph and an overview of the operating theatre were recorded simultaneously. The time for each phase, efficient actions (e.g. identifying lesions by inspection, making an ultrasonogram or taking a biopsy) and limiting factors (e.g. technical problems, time spent waiting) were determined, and a current standard was defined. RESULTS: Of the actions performed, 52 per cent were qualified as efficient, 17 per cent were classified as time spent waiting for personnel, instruments were positioned in 13 per cent, and unnecessary instrument exchanges were involved in 10 per cent. The evaluation led to a significant reduction in delay times and resulted in design criteria for improved biopsy instruments. The current standard was calculated from the mean time and number of actions determined for each phase. CONCLUSION: This time-motion study provided detailed insight into the peroperative process of DLLU, leading to improvements in the surgical process and instruments used. The defined current standard will enable evaluation of the learning curve and new technologies.     

Determining resectability for hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography

We reviewed our experience with preoperative determination of resectability in patients with hepatocel-lular carcinoma (HCC) over the last 10 years, and evaluated the role of laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography (USG) since we instituted this technique in June 1994. From January 1989 to December 1998, 500 of 1741 patients with HCC (28.7%) were considered suitable for hepatic resection after preoperative assessment. Significantly more contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans and fewer percutaneous USGs or hepatic arteriograms were performed in the 299 patients managed since June 1994 (group 2) than in the 201 patients managed before then (group 1). One hundred and ninety-eight patients in group 2 (66%) underwent laparoscopy with laparoscopic USG. Unresectable disease was found in 41 patients in group 1 (20.4%) (all at laparotomy), and in 68 patients in group 2 (22.7%) (16 at laparotomy without laparoscopic examination, 31 at laparoscopic examination alone, and 21 at laparotomy after an inconclusive laparoscopic examination) (P = 0.5). The most common features of unresectable disease were the presence of bilobar intrahepatic metastases and an inadequate liver remnant with cirrhosis. The adoption of the laparoscopic examination after June 1994 improved the overall resection rate at laparotomy in group 2 from 77.3% to 86.2%, which was better than that in group 1 (79.6%, P = 0.057). For patients with unresectable disease, the operation time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in group 2. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 9.8% and 4.9%, respectively, in group 1, and 5.9% and 2.9% in group 2. There was no operative morbidity in the 31 patients who had unresectable disease detected by the laparoscopic examination alone. Laparoscopy with laparoscopic USG avoids unnecessary laparotomy, and has a definite role in determining resectability in patients with HCC. Received for publication on Jan. 17, 2000; accepted on April 1, 2000     

Role of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the management of patients with oesophagogastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography (lapUS) have been shown to improve the staging of patients with oesophagogastric cancer but there remains doubt as to whether most benefit follows laparoscopy alone and how much is contributed by the addition of lapUS. METHODS: The role of lapUS in surgical decision making was evaluated prospectively in a consecutive series of patients with oesophagogastric cancer following conventional radiological assessment. The results of the lapUS findings over and above the laparoscopic findings were documented in order to identify the additional benefit of lapUS. RESULTS: After initial conventional assessment 41 patients were considered unsuitable for surgery and treated by palliation, with a further 25 patients proceeding to surgery without laparoscopy. Of the 93 patients who underwent laparoscopy, 18 were shown to have irresectable disease and avoided further surgery; a further seven avoided inappropriate surgery by the addition of lapUS. The open-close laparotomy rate was reduced from five of 25 in patients who did not undergo laparoscopy to nine (12 per cent) of 75 by the introduction of laparoscopy and to two (3 per cent) of 68 with the addition of lapUS. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy alone prevented unnecessary surgery in 18 (19 per cent) of 93 patients with oesophagogastric cancer and the addition of lapUS identified a further seven patients (8 per cent) in whom unnecessary surgery was avoided.     

The role of laparoscopy in advanced pancreatic cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Histological diagnosis between ductal and endocrine carcinoma is imperative in patients with advanced and unresectable pancreatic malignancies because of the different treatment modalities and prognoses. Whenever percutaneous and endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine needle aspiration (FNA) fails to obtain a diagnostic specimen, a laparoscopic approach may be employed. METHODS: Between October 2002 and July 2004, 19 patients with demonstrated unresectable pancreatic cancer underwent laparoscopy to obtain a cytohistological diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 83 min. Laparoscopy showed the presence of liver metastases in 15 patients that were correctly diagnosed by preoperative imaging in only 8 cases (53%). Overall 5 pancreatic FNA and 16 liver and peritoneal biopsies were obtained. In 1 patient the procedure was abandoned due to hypercapnia. In 16 patients (84%) a cytohistological diagnosis was obtained. There were no mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic biopsy of advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer is a feasible, safe and reliable procedure to obtain a cytohistological diagnosis whenever ultrasound-guided FNA fails.     

The role of laparoscopy in the management of suspected pancreatic and periampullary malignancies

Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected periampullary malignancies has been utilized more frequently in recent years. Its exact role with regard to staging and surgical bypass for palliation have yet to be clearly defined. To better define the role of laparoscopy in the evaluation and palliation of periampullary malignancy, a retrospective review of the Duke experience was carried out. Fifty-three patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary malignancies were referred for surgical evaluation at Duke University Medical Center between 1993 and 1995. All patients underwent CT scanning and lesions were classified as resectable or unresectable based on previously established criteria. Patients either underwent laparoscopic evaluation (n=30; 11 with laparoscopic palliation) or proceeded directly to celiotomy (n=23). Charts were reviewed for postoperative course including complications, length of stay, and hospital costs. Although laparoscopy had a sensitivity of 93.3% for metastatic disease, CT scans accurately staged 86.8% of patients missing only one patient with peritoneal/hepatic disease. Based on these results, laparoscopy may not be beneficial for every patient with a suspected pancreatic malignancy. Retrospectively an attempt was made to determine which patients benefited from laparoscopy and which patients are best served by proceeding directly to open exploration. From these data we devised an algorithm that outlines an efficient and cost-effective approach for this patient population. Presented at the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Francisco, Calif., May 19–22, 1996.     

腹腔镜及其超声检查在腹部恶性肿瘤术前的应用研究

目的 :研究腹腔镜及腹腔镜超声检查在腹部恶性肿瘤术前应用的意义。方法 :将腹部恶性肿瘤6 0例随机分为 2组 ,A组术前使用腹腔镜及其超声检查了解肿瘤情况 ,并根据检查结果决定是否行开腹手术 ,B组直接行剖腹探查。结果 :A组术前使用腹腔镜及其超声检查的患者中 6例发现失去了手术时机 ,未再行手术治疗 ;2例在腹腔镜辅助下施行了姑息性手术 ;余者施行了根治性手术。B组直接行剖腹探查的患者中发现 5例病程较晚无手术价值而直接关腹 ;2例施行了姑息性手术 ;余者施行了根治性手术。结论 :腹部恶性肿瘤患者术前使用腹腔镜及其超声检查有助于了解病变的范围及分期 ,为制定合理的治疗方案提供了可靠依据 ,使患者免受不必要的创伤和打击 ,降低了手术并发症的发生率 ,减少了患者痛苦和医疗费用     

Role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic tumours

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radiological imaging alone is not reliable enough in staging of pancreatic cancer. Not only because of poor sensitivity but also because there is a tendency to overstage tumours. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of spiral computed tomography (CT), transabdominal ultrasound (US), laparoscopy (LAP) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) in staging of pancreatic tumours. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study 27 patients underwent pancreatic tumour staging with CT, US, LAP and LUS. The reference standard was operative evaluation or in case of disseminated disease laparoscopic assessment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although LAP was hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients the benefit of LAP staging was evident in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis. The assessment of the local tumour expansion of a pancreatic carcinoma was difficult for all staging modalities. LUS did not change the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy once. In our experience routine use of laparoscopic staging does not benefit patients with pancreatic tumour but in selected cases it may prevent unnecessary laparotomy.