Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

''Long-Term Results of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-Term Therapy of Antitachycardia Pacing for Supraventricular Tachycardia

Long-term antitachycardia pacing therapy with the InterTach 262-12 and 262-16 was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients (mean age 50 +/- 13 years) with recurrent, drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 20 patients, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in ten patients, and a reentrant tachycardia due to Mahaim fibers in one patient. During follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months, 250 persistent tachycardia episodes occurred in 22 patients. By adjusting detection and termination mode, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia could be controlled in 19 of 32 patients (60%) by antitachycardia pacing alone. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required in ten of 32 patients (30%). During follow-up antitachycardia pacing became ineffective in three patients (10%). Thus, chronic antitachycardia pacing proved to be safe and effective in selected patients with drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia and could significantly improve quality of life by rapid termination of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia episodes.     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

The Importance of Antitachycardia Pacing for Patients Presenting with Ventricular Tachycardia

The initial experience from electrophysiological studies showed that pacing induced termination of ventricular tachycardias is usually possible but requires a critical pacing sequence. Studies on the resetting phenomenon showed, in most instances of failure of termination, that the "limiting factor" to produce ventricular tachycardia termination is usually failure to produce block within the circuit rather than failure to access or interact with the ventricular tachycardia origin. The resetting response is related to tachycardia termination in a number of ways. Of note is that a steeply increasing resetting pattern usually predicts tachycardia termination. Between 50% and 90% of induced ventricular tachycardias will be terminated by trains of rapid ventricular pacing. The analysis of the pacing rate necessary for termination shows that it varies widely. Paced cycle lengths of < 80% of tachycardia cycle length are necessary in at least 20% of tachycardias. In contrast, the incidence of acceleration is closely related to the paced cycle length: it is negligible with paced cycle lengths over 80% of tachycardia cycle length and increases to 36% with paced cycle lengths below 76% of tachycardia cycle length. Present information about efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in spontaneous tachycardias suggests that it is extremely effective, with over 90% success. However, it is likely that these data correspond to a selected group of tachycardias.     

The Relationship between Pacing Site and Induction or Termination of Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia by Antitachycardia Pacing

Background: With the development of left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization, there is an interest in the possibility of improving ventricular antitachycardia pacing (ATP) efficacy by pacing from the LV electrode(s).
Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of pacing delivered from the left coronary vein (LCV) compared to that delivered from the right ventricular apex (RVA) upon ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction and termination.
Methods: Sixty patients undergoing provocative ventricular electrophysiology (EP) studies in three centers were enrolled. Multipolar EP catheters were placed in the atrium, the RVA, and LCV. VT induction was attempted from the RVA and LCV in random order. Upon detection of monomorphic VT, burst ATP for up to 10 pulses at 88% VT cycle length was delivered from the RVA or LCV, in a random order, and crossed over when possible. Identical VT morphologies were reinduced to allow paired comparison of RVA versus LCV ATP.
Results: Data from 55 patients were analyzed. Thirty-four morphologically distinct monomorphic VT types were induced in 22 patients. ATP succeeded in 18 (55%) and VTs in 13 patients. RVA ATP terminated 15 of 23 (65%) VTs, and LCV ATP terminated 10 of 23 (43%) VTs (P = 0.14). ATP delivered ipsilateral to the earliest activation site required 5.0 ± 2.6 pulses to terminate compared to 4.8 ± 1.7 pulses when delivered from the contralateral site (P = 0.90). Paired comparison was possible for 13 VT morphologies in 11 patients. Paired RVA and LCV ATP efficacy was identical (54 % vs 54%, P = 1.0).
Conclusion: ATP delivered from a LCV lead offers no efficacy advantage over pacing from the RVA. (PACE 2010; 27–32)     

Pacing for Ventricular Tachycardia

Plusieurs problèmes restent à résoudre avant que les stimulateurs puissent jouer un rôle majeur dans le traitement de la tachycardie ventriculaire. Nous citons des exemples pour illustrer quelques difficultés à résoudre. les mécanismes qui contribuent au succès ou à l'échec de la stimulation antitachycardie sont discutés. L'avenir de cette stimulation sera plus assuré dès que ces appareils serent équipés d'un cardioverteur-défibrillateur de secours.     

Clinical Interest of a Sensor Driven Algorithm Limiting Ventricular Pacing Rate During Supraventricular Tachycardia in Dual Chamber Pacing

A sensor driven algorithm limiting ventricular pacing rate during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is included in a dual chamber rate modulated pacemaker sensitive to acceleration forces (Relay, 294-03, Intermedics Inc.). According to the intensity of concomitant exercise, the ventricular pacing rate is limited either to the programmed maximum pacing rate (MPR) or to an interim lower limit, called "conditional ventricular tracking limit" (CVTL). The MPR prevails over the CVTL when the sensor calculated pacing rate exceeds the minimal rate by more than 20 beats/mm. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of this algorithm in patients with intermittent SVT. Method: a Relay was implanted in four patients with a bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome and in four patients with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). All had episodes of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. The units were programmed in DDDR: rate responsive parameters were adjusted by simulating the rate response during three levels of exercise to let the MPR override the CVTL only during strenuous exercise. Holter monitors and exercise testings were performed at 3-month follow-up. Results: in seven patients, Holter recordings showed Supraventricular arrhythmias at rest with a ventricular pacing rate limited to the CVTL. Appropriate rate increases during exercise testings were also demonstrated. Three devices had to be reprogrammed in DDIR tone patient suffering from nearly permanent atrial flutter and two patients not tolerating the CVTL pacing rate at rest). Conclusion: the CVTL algorithm is effective in protecting against high ventricular pacing rates during Supraventricular arrhythmias. It allows the selection of the DDDR mode even with a high MPR in patients with intermittent SVT.     

Antitachycardia Pacing: A Comparison of Burst Overdrive, Self-Searching and Adaptive Table Scanning Programs

Eight patients with the Siemens Elema "Tachylog" generator implanted for management of paroxysmal reentrant tachycardia were studied to assess the safety and efficiency of three antitachycardia programs. The programs investigated were burst overdrive, self-searching, and adaptive table scanning. There were five males and three females aged 19-62 years. Seven had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and one had dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Four had right atrial electrodes and four had right ventricular electrodes. Patients were studied lying, standing, and exercising in all three modes, and the appropriate long-term programs were chosen. The generator remained in a program for 1 month, it was interrogated and the memory was read, and then it was reprogrammed to a different antitachycardia mode. Burst overdrive was unsuitable for long-term use in four patients, producing atrial fibrillation in one and ventricular arrhythmias in three. In this group, self-searching and adaptive table scanning were safe and equally effective (mean number of attempts/tachycardia 6.97 and 6.3, respectively). In the four patients in whom all three programs could be used, burst overdrive proved to be most efficient, the mean number of attempts/tachycardia were 2.4 (cf 9.6 and 9.0 for self-searching and adaptive table scanning). Thus, burst overdrive was only suitable for long-term use in 50% of our patients, but when safe it was more efficient than the other two programs, especially in those with narrow termination windows on exercise.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

The Impact of Antitachycardia Pacing with Defibrillation

Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be reproducibly terminated by programmed endocardiaJ right ventricular stimulation. However, antitachycardia pacing can be associated with possible acceleration of VT, while frequent episodes of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The combined use of antitachycardia pacing and the AICD (automatic implantable cardioverier defibrillator) was evaluated in 6 out of 51 patients (age 57 ± 11 years) in whom the AICD had been implanted because of recurrent VT. In each instance VT could be terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. The interactive mode of VT termination by a pacemaker (Tachylog) as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar, ventricular inhibited (VVI) device with antitachycardia burst stimulation capability, allowing two to five stimuli at intervals of 260–300 ms and one or two interventions. During follow-up of 47 ± 24 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 50–505 times per patient. When burst stimulation accelerated VT, termination was achieved by AICD discharge. Thus, drug resistant VT can be terminated by antitachycardia pacing to avoid patient discomfort. In the event of tachycardia acceleration, VT was terminated by the AICD. A universal pacemaker-defibrillafor should combine antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing with back-up cardioversion defibrillation.     

Observations on Induction and Termination of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia by External Pacing

Paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) can be reproducibly induced and terminated by critically timed atrial or ventricular depolarizations. In this study, noninvasive trans-cutaneous (external) cardiac pacing (NTCPJ was compared to endocardial ventricular pacing for the termination and induction of PSVT. In 24 patients, either atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia or AV reciprocating tachycardia was reproducibly terminated with either critically timed ventricular depolarizations or overdrive ventricular pacing from an endocardial right ventricular site. There were 32 trials of NTCP attempts to interrupt PSVT in the 24 patients. External pacing was successful at terminating PSVT in 23 patients and in 30 of 32 (94%) trials. In 20 patients, there were 26 trials of external pacing attempts to induce PSVT. External pacing initiated PSVT in 21 of 26 trials (81%). The pacing sequences used to induce and terminate PSVT with external pacing were copied from the endocardial sequences. The external pacing threshold averaged 77 ± 22 mA but the current needed to terminate PSVT was about 1.5 greater than threshold at 117 ± 27 mA. Serial external pacing studies were performed in seven patients. The thresholds for external pacing were similar from trial to trial as were the mode of termination and induction between the endocardial and external methods. External pacing can terminate most AV reciprocating tachycardias and many AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. It appears promising as a means of inducing PSVT. However, the high stimulation amplitudes needed will prohibit wide acceptance of external pacing for induction and termination of PSVT.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Pacing Techniques for Termination of Well-Tolerated Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardias can be terminated by a variety of pacemaker techniques, including rapid and slow stimulation. Fast tachycardias are typically poorly tolerated, and require prompt intervention, usually with rapid pacing. Termination of ventricular tachycardia by slow or single capture pacemaker stimulation techniques is attractive, because of its presumed safety and the possibility of using simple implantable pacers. To identify factors favoring termination, single capture stimulation was used in 390 episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 21 patients, 16 with coronary artery disease, able to tolerate ventricular tachycardia forseveral minutes. Single capture stimulation terminated 223 episodes (57%) in 18 patients, and two were accelerated. Of 157 episodes exposed to 2–3 programmed extrastimuli or rapid pacing 149 (94%) were terminated and 7 were accelerated. Direct current cardioversion was needed in 12 episodes. Without medications, only two patients tolerated VT. Only one patient had reliable termination with single capture stimulation over several days. Systolic blood pressure was similar in episodes terminated and not terminated by single capture stimulation, but the ventricular rate was significantly lower in episodes terminated, 116 ± 19 vs. 133 ±24 (p<0.001). Termination of ventricular tachycardia was not affected by QRS morphology. Single capture termination of ventricular tachycardia is largely unpredictable, with limited reproducibility over a period of time. Although comparatively safe, single capture techniques are not likely toprove useful in the long-term treatment of many patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.     

Local Activation Time Derived from Stored EGM is Associated with Failure of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Defibrillator

Background : Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an effective treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, persistent failure of ATP in some patients is well recognized. Methods : A method of deriving the local activation time from stored intracardiac electrograms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators is described. Using a case‐control design, the local activation times were compared between patients with persistent unsuccessful ATP with comparable controls with successful ATP. Results : The local activation times during VT in patients with failed ATP were longer at 120–180 ms compared with corresponding control patients with successful ATP (60–80 ms). The local activation time expressed as a proportion of VT cycle length in patients with failed ATP compared with patients with successful ATP were 0.40 ± 0.08 versus 0.19 ± 0.08 (P = 0.012). Conclusion : A novel method of deriving local activation time is described, and delayed local activation time may explain failure of ATP in terminating VT in some patients. (PACE 2010; 549–552)     

Antitachycardia Pacing

Patients who have attempted repair of congenital heart disease often develop bradycardia and tachycardias postoperatively. The two dysrhythmias each make treatment of the other more difficult. Pacing is the only modality that addresses both brady- and tachycardias, without adversely influencing the other. Most postoperative tachycardias are reentrant, and thus uniquely susceptible to overdrive pacing. Usually an atrial single lead system is used. The patients most commonly encountered are those with extensive atrial surgery, such as atrial septal defect [ASD] repair. Mustard and Senning repair of d-transposition, and the various types of Fontan operations. The results are excellent for ASD repair and postoperative transposition, but only fair for postoperative Fontan patients.     

Efficacy of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients Presenting with Cardiac Arrest

The efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) incorporated into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) was assessed in 29 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest, not attributable to acute myocardial infarction, ischemia, or drug and electrolyte effects. The cohort included 25 men and 4 women with a mean age of 65 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 29%. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease, 11 had nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 had long QT syndrome. Programmed stimulation yielded monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 17 patients, polymorphic VT in 6, and no inducible VT in 6. During a mean follow-up of 22 months, a total of 91 episodes of monomorphic VT occurred, 73 of which were successfully pace terminated (83%). Monomorphic VT amenable to pace termination recurred only in the group that had this arrhythmia inducible. The recurrent arrhythmias in the 12 patients having either no inducible VT or polymorphic VT were all rapid VTs, having a cycle length < 220 ms; and therefore, not amenable to pace termination. These results suggest that ATP incorporated into ICDs is useful in survivors of cardiac arrest and may significantly reduce the number of shocks that these patients would otherwise receive. Programmed stimulation may also help to define those patients who would receive the maximum benefit from ATP.     

Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia

FROMER, M., ET AL.: Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia. An antitachycardia pulse generator, the Intermedics Intertach 262-12 was implanted in 16 patients (14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia of various origins and two patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia), who were not responsive to various antiarrhythmic drug regimens. The follow-up was from 6–49 months (mean 30.9 ± 13.8). Five patients had a follow-up of over 3 years. The device was used in all patients. One patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Loss of responsiveness to burst pacing was observed in 1/14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and nontolerance of antitachycardia pacing in one patient. Overall clinical success of pacing was observed in 13/16 patients = 81%. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions.     

Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: How Many Attempts Are Useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 ± 15 months (range, 17–63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 ± 14; range, 1–49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80 %) with a mean number of 1.6 ± 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%→ 31%→ 24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%→ 46%→ 29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%→ 13%→ 28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%→ 0%→ 0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 ± 5 seconds, 37 ± 2 seconds, and 41 ± 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used ≥3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with ≥4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.