Postsurgical complications in living-related liver donors

From September 2001 until March 2007, we performed 127 living-donor liver transplantations in our transplantation center. Of 127 donors, 74 were men and 53 women, of overall mean donor age of 35.2 +/- 9.3 years (range, 20-56 years). Ninety-six (75.6%) were first-degree relatives, 18 (14.1%) were second-degree relatives, and 13 (10.3%) were spouses. We performed 34 (26.7%) left hepatic lobectomies, 33 (25.3%) left lateral segmentectomies, and 60 (48%) right hepatic lobectomies. The mean percentages of remnant to donor total liver volume for the right, left, and left-lateral lobectomies were 41.7%, 67.8%, and 75.1%, respectively. The mean length of patient postoperative hospital stay was 7.4 +/- 3.1 days (range, 3-33 days). There was no postoperative mortality. Ten complications occurred in 7 of the 127 donors (5.5%). Most complications were treated with radiologic interventions. In conclusion, donor safety should be the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. More experience, improved surgical techniques, and meticulous donor evaluation will help to minimize morbidity and mortality for living liver donors.     

Results of 132 hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation: report of one death

AIMS: Liver transplant is the primary therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease. Its high success rates have lead to a broadening of the indications for liver transplantation, resulting in an increasing shortage of donors. Living donor liver transplantation has become an option to overcome waiting list mortality. We describe our experience with hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation and report a case of death. METHODS: Patients (n = 132) underwent hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from June 2000 through June 2004. A 4-phase preoperative evaluation was performed on all patients, whose ages ranged from 13 to 54 years (mean = 29.7 +/- 8.1 years). Of the 132 patients, 76 patients (57.5%) underwent left lateral segmentectomy, 33 patients (25%) underwent left lobectomy, and 23 patients (16%) underwent right hepatectomy. In 2 other patients (1.5%), a monosegment (segment II) was obtained after left lateral segmentectomy. RESULTS: Twenty patients (15%) experienced a complication, the most common being incisional hernia, pneumonia, and biliary fistulae. On the seventh postoperative day, 1 patient developed a fatal cerebral hemorrhage while recovering from mild liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Although living donor liver transplantation is generally safe, serious and fatal complications may occur.     

Feasibility of Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation Between Adults: An 8-Year, Single-Center Experience of 107 Cases

Operative mortality for a right lobe (RL) donor in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is estimated to be as high as 0.5–1%. To minimize the risk to the donor, left lobe (LL)-LDLT might be an ideal option in adult LDLT. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of LL-LDLT between adults based on a single-center experience of 107 LL-LDLTs performed over 8 years. The mean graft weight of LL grafts was 452 g, which amounted to 40.5% of the estimated standard liver volume of the recipients. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates in LL-LDLT were 81.4, 76.9 and 74.7%, respectively, which were comparable to those of RL-LDLT. Twenty-six grafts (24.3%) were lost for various reasons with three losses directly attributable to small-for-size graft syndrome. Post-operative liver function and hospital stay in LL donors were significantly better and shorter than that in RL donors, while the incidence of donor morbidity was comparable between LL and RL donors. In conclusion, LL-LDLT was found to be a feasible option in adult-to-adult LDLT. Further utilization of LL grafts should be undertaken to keep the chance of donor morbidity and mortality minimal.     

A comparison of right and left lobectomies for living donor liver transplantation: an anesthesiologist's point of view

Because of the shortage of cadaveric donor organs, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an established therapy modality for end-stage liver disease. Based on recipient size, both right and left liver lobe grafts have been used successfully in LDLT. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of intraoperative complications and transfusion requirements between right and left lobe donors. We reviewed the charts of 54 right lobe (Group RL), 29 left lobe (Group LL), and 31 left lateral segment (Group LLS) donors who underwent lobectomy from January 2003 through January 2007. We recorded patient demographics, perioperative laboratory values, intraoperative fluid and transfusion requirements, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and complications. Demographic features and preoperative laboratory values were similar for the 3 groups, except for age (Group RL, 37.3 +/- 8.7; Group LL, 36.0 +/- 9.3; Group LLS, 31.7 +/- 9.4; P = .02). There were no significant differences in mean liver volumes among the groups (P > .05). Respective graft volumes were 803.1 +/- 139.2 mL, 438.0 +/- 122.7 mL, and 308.2 +/- 76.6 mL for Groups RL, LL, and LLS, respectively (P < .001). More patients in Group LLS required heterologous blood transfusion than did those in the other groups (P = .01). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was similar for all groups (P > .05). Group RL had a significantly higher rate of intraoperative hypothermia than the other groups (P = .01). There were no intraoperative respiratory complications or cardiac events. These results indicated that both right and left donor lobectomies for LDLT were safe procedures with acceptable rates of minor intraoperative complications.     

To Do or Not to Do Living Donor Hepatectomy in Jehovah''s Witnesses: Single Institution Experience of the First 13 Resections

Living donor liver transplantation has come to be an acceptable alternative to deceased donor transplants. Several ethical issues related to living donation have been raised in the face of reported perioperative morbidity and mortality. We report our experience in 13 consecutive Jehovah's Witness (JW) donor hepatectomies. From June 1999 to April 2004, 13 adult JW donors underwent donor hepatectomies at the USC-University Hospital. Nine donors underwent right lobectomy with a 62% mean volume of the liver resected. Four donors underwent a left lateral segmentectomy with a mean volume of 17.8%. Cell scavenging techniques, acute normovolemic hemodilution and fractionated products were used. The mean hospital stay was 6.2 days. All donors are alive and well at a median follow-up time of 3 years and 4 months. Live liver donation can be done safely in JW population if performed within a comprehensive bloodless surgery program.     

活体右半肝供体的安全性

目的 探讨活体右半肝供体的安全性。方法 对2002年1月至2005年6月施行的13例活体右半肝移植中供体的资料进行回顾性研究。不阻断入肝血流,在肝中静脉右侧,用超声刀离断肝组织得到右半供肝。通过计算得到标准肝体积及残余左半肝的比例。结果 右半供肝切取术平均失血490ml,平均输血440ml。围手术期平均输入人血白蛋白85g。1例供体门静脉分为3支,2例供体右后与右前胆管汇入左肝管,1例左外与左内胆管先后与右肝管汇合成肝总管,术中处理恰当,门静脉左干血流及左肝管胆汁引流保持通畅。2例供肝轻度脂肪变。术后第1天肝功能均有不同程度损害,但术后1周恢复到接近正常水平。术后并发症包括1例腹腔内出血,2例切口脂肪液化和1例乳糜漏。所有供体恢复好并回到原工作岗位。结论 只要保证左半肝血管与胆管通畅,残余肝体积在30％以上及手术对残余肝无大的损伤,右半供肝切取是安全的。     

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: single-center experience in Egypt with 400 consecutive cases

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we present our experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and evaluate the outcomes of donors and recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and August 2006, 400 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed in our institution. Donors were evaluated for renal vasculature using computed tomography angiography. We used the left kidney in 329 donors and the right kidney in 71. Donor surgeries were done transperitoneally using three trocars on the left side and four trocars on the right side. Kidneys were extracted manually through a 7-cm Pfanenstiel incision. RESULTS: All cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 117 +/- 34 minutes. Mean blood loss was 56 +/- 28 mL. None of the donors required a blood transfusion. Mean warm ischemia time was 2.6 +/- 0.4 minutes. The mean renal artery length was 3.1 +/- 0.4 cm; the mean renal vein length was 2.4 +/- 1.2 cm. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. No donor required readmission. Kidneys were transplanted successfully and the mean recipient creatinine on discharge was 1.2 +/- 0.6 mg/dL. One patient had a renal artery thrombosis on postoperative day 2. Another patient with double renal arteries had thrombosis of the smaller artery just after surgery. Acute tubular necrosis was seen in 17 patients, four of whom required dialysis. Kidney function recovered thereafter in all acute tubular necrosis cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive approach for living donor nephrectomy with good functional outcomes. The donor benefits from lesser morbidity without compromising the anatomic or physiological outcome of the nephrectomized kidney.     

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of livers for transplantation has prompted transplant centers to seek alternatives to conventional cadaveric liver transplantation. Left lateral segmentectomy from living donors has proven to be a safe operation for the donor with excellent results in the pediatric population. Left lobectomy, conceived to supply more tissue, still provides insufficient liver mass for an average size adult patient. Right lobectomy could supply a graft of adequate size. METHODS: Donors were considered only after recipients were listed according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria. Donor evaluation included liver biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, and celiac and mesenteric angiography. The donor operation consisted of a right lobectomy uniformly performed throughout the series as described herein. RESULTS: Twenty-five right lobe living donor liver transplants were performed between adults, with no significant complications in donors. Recipient and graft survival was 88%, with three recipient deaths secondary to uncontrolled sepsis in patients at high risk for liver transplant; all three had functioning grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation poses challenges that require a meticulous surgical technique to minimize morbidity in the recipient. Right lobectomies for living donation can be performed safely with minimal risk to both donor and recipient although providing adequate liver mass for an average size adult patient.     

Short- and long-term outcomes after living donor liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Living donor liver transplantation was first described as a way to alleviate the organ shortage. Extensive studies of both the prospective donor and the recipient are necessary to ensure successful outcome. In this paper we describe our results in 28 living donor liver transplantations from the perspective of the donor and the recipient. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal, observational, comparative study was conducted from April 1995 to October 2004, including 28 living donor liver transplantations. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up time of 25.6 +/- 20.58 months, all donors are alive, showing normal liver function tests. All of them have been reincorporated into their normal lives. At the end of the study and after a mean follow-up time of 21.2 +/- 14.3 months, 86.3% of the adult recipients are alive. Actuarial recipient survivals at 6, 12, and 36 months were 86.36%. Actuarial mean survival time was 44 months (95% CI, 37 to 51). At the end of the study, 77.3% of the grafts are functioning. Actuarial graft survivals at 6, 12, and 36 months were 77.27%. Actuarial mean graft survival time was 32 months (95% CI, 25 to 39). The main complications were hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 2) and small for-size syndrome (n = 2). At a mean follow-up of 20.33 +/- 7.74 months, all pediatric recipients are alive. Actuarial recipient survivals at 12 and 36 months were 100% and actuarial graft survivals were 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplantation may increase the liver graft pool, and therefore reduce waiting list mortality. Nevertheless caution must be deserved to avoid surgical morbidity and mortality in with the donor the recipient.     

Living related liver transplantation for acute liver failure in children.

The mortality rate among children with acute liver failure (ALF) on the waiting list for liver transplantation is high. We present our experience with living related donor liver transplantation (LRD-LT) in children who required urgent transplantation for ALF. Between December 1995 and July 1997, 6 children underwent LRD-LT for ALF. Cause of liver failure, recipient and donor demographics, clinical and laboratory data, surgical details, complications, and 6-month and 2-year graft and patient survival were recorded. Five boys and 1 girl received left lateral segment grafts from their parents. The mean age was 4 +/- 2.8 years (range, 1 to 9 years). ALF was caused by Wilson's disease in 1 patient and sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome in 1 patient; in 4 patients, the cause was unknown. All patients had mental status changes; 2 were on life support. Mean pretransplantation liver function test values were: alanine aminotransferase, 972 +/- 565 U/L (normal, 1 to 53 U/L), total bilirubin, 31.3 +/- 12.4 mg/dL (normal, 0.1 to 1.2 mg/dL), prothrombin time, 34.3 +/- 12.4 seconds (normal, 10.8 to 13.3 seconds), international normalized ratio, 8.46 +/- 5.4 (normal < 2), and fibrinogen, 109 +/- 23.9 mg/dL (normal, 175 to 400 mg/dL). The donors were 5 mothers and 1 father. The mean donor age was 32.5 +/- 7.6 years (range, 19 to 40 years). No donor required blood transfusion, and no donor had any early or late postoperative complications. The donors' mean hospital length of stay was 5 days. In five cases, grafts were blood group-compatible; 1 child received a blood group-incompatible graft. All grafts functioned immediately. No patient had hepatic artery or portal vein thrombosis or biliary complications. The child who received a mismatched graft died of infection of the brain caused by Aspergillus spp at 22 days posttransplantation with a functioning graft. The child with ALF caused by sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome developed outflow obstruction 3 months posttransplantation and required retransplantation; he eventually died of vascular complications related to his primary disease. Four children are alive at a mean follow-up of 27 months (range, 14 to 36 months). LRD-LT for children with ALF facilitates timely transplantation without drawing on cadaveric donor resources. The established safety record of LRD-LT made this option appealing to both physicians and parental donors.     

Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors

Background

Donor safety is the primary focus in living-donor liver transplantation. Although, the procedure carries a significant risk of morbidity and even death, the use of marginal living donors is a current issue of discussion.

Patients and Methods

Between September 2001 and October 2008, we performed 203 liver transplantation procedures using organs from living donors. Of 203 donors, 115 were men and 88 were women, with a mean (SD; range) age of 34.5 (9; 19-66) years. One hundred fifty donors were first-degree relatives of the recipients, 36 were second-degree relatives, and 17 were spouses. We did not accept grafts with remnant volume less than 40% or from donors with impaired liver function. We performed 96 right-lobe 38 left-lobe, and 69 left-lateral segmentectomies. For the right-lobe grafts, the median hepatic vein was always left in the remnant liver. The mean ratios of remnant to total donor liver volume were 42.0%, 66.8%, and 74.6% for the right-, left-, and left lateral segmentectomies, respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 7.0, 6.2, and 9.7 days, respectively. Mean operative time was 330, 324, and 324 minutes, respectively. Only 15 donors (7.8%) received autologous blood transfusions during surgery. Liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin concentrations and prothrombin time were assessed postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 at outpatient follow-up, usually at week 3.

Results

There were no deaths; however, 26 complications occurred in 20 of 203 donors (5.2%), most of which were treated with radiologic interventions.

Conclusion

Larger grafts produce impaired function in the early postoperative period; however, they do not have a negative effect in the long term. The remnant volume should be measured fastidiously, and surgeons must avoid taking large volumes of liver, especially in right-lobe donors.     

Anesthetic management and complications in living donor hepatectomy

A total of 112 living donor hepatectomies (LDHs) performed from October 1999 to April 2003 at Ege University Hospital Organ Transplantation Center were reviewed and perioperative anesthetic courses and complications were determined. There was no perioperative mortality. Mean duration of operations was 333 +/- 77 minutes (range, 160 to 540 minutes) for right lobectomies and 277 +/- 88 minutes (range, 150 to 500 minutes) for left lateral segment plus left lobe operations. The remnant liver volume ratios of the patients was 0.58 +/- 0.16 (range, 0.30 to 0.91) after harvesting. Crystalloids, colloid infusions, and transfusions aimed to keep hematocrit >25%, central venous pressure (CVP) <5 mm Hg and to maintain a urine output >1 mL/kg(-1) while nitroglycerin was infused (0.5 to 2.0 microg/kg(-1)h(-1)) when needed to allow fluid infusions freely without increasing the CVP values.No transfusion was needed for 91 patients (81%) and 21 right lobectomy patients needed transfusion of blood products. Initial mean hematocrit of 38.9 +/- 4.9% (range, 27% to 50%) for all patients was found 31.5% +/- 5% (21% to 44%) at the end of the operation. Albumin blood levels averaged 4.27 +/- 0.49 g/dL(-1) at the beginning and 3.28 +/- 0.45 g/dL(-1) after hepatic resection. Perioperative complications were one air embolism, postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome in one patient, transient but severe hemoglobinuria due to a predonated autologous blood transfusion in another, prolonged recovery for neuromuscular blocker overdose in one patient, and postoperative atelectasis in three patients, two of whom had pneumonia later while two other patients had pleural effusions. One required a drainage. Living donor hepatectomies were performed with acceptable complications in anesthetic management during this study. The operation provides us with an optimal liver segment without resulting in mortality.     

Impact of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation on Waiting Time Survival in Candidates Listed for Liver Transplantation

Studies comparing adult living donor liver transplantation to deceased donor liver transplantation have focused on post-transplant survival. Our aim was to focus on the impact of living donor liver transplant on waiting time mortality and overall mortality. We analyzed the affect of living donor liver transplantation on waiting time mortality and overall mortality (from listing until last follow up) in a cohort of 116 transplant candidates. Fifty-eight candidates who had individuals present as potential living donors (volunteer group) were matched by MELD score to 58 liver transplant candidates who did not have individuals present as a potential living donor (no volunteer group). Twenty-seven percent of candidates in the no volunteer group and 62% of candidates in the volunteer group underwent liver transplantation, p = 0.0003. One-year waiting list mortality for the volunteer group and no volunteer group was 10% and 20%, respectively, p = 0.03. Patient survival from the time of listing to last follow up was similar between the two groups. In our study group, living donor liver transplantation is associated with a higher rate of liver transplantation and lower waiting time mortality. In the era of living donor liver transplantation, estimates of patient survival should incorporate waiting time mortality.     

Small remnant liver volume after right lobe living donor hepatectomy

BACKGROUND: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation has become a viable option for adult patients with end-stage liver disease, however, the safety of the donor is of paramount importance. One of the key factors in donor safety is ensuring adequate donor remnant liver volume. METHODS: We retrospectively examined donors who had less than 30% remnant liver volume after right graft procurement. Eighty-six right lobe living donor transplants were carried out in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, from January 1999 to December 2004. RESULTS: Eight donors had less than 30% remnant liver volume (Group 1) after graft procurement and 78 donors had remnant liver volume greater than 30% (Group 2). There were no differences in donor characteristics, types of graft, operative parameters, and post-operative liver and renal function as well as liver volume at 6 months post-donation between the 2 groups. The graft weight obtained in Group 1 donors was significantly greater compared with that from Group 2 (P<.005). The overall donor complication rate was 6.98%, and all the complications occurred among group 2 donors. CONCLUSIONS: The judicious use of donors with less than 30% remnant liver volume is safe as a last resort.     

Intraoperative blood loss is a risk factor for complications in donors after living donor hepatectomy.

Complications in a donor are a distressing but inevitable occurrence, since graft procurement is a major undertaking. Although the technique for procurement has some similarities to hepatic resection, a donor is very unlike a patient with malignancy. The risk factors identified in these patients cannot be extrapolated to donors. Donor hepatectomy carried out from June 1995 to March 2005 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center was reviewed with the aim of identifying risk factors for complications. There were 204 living donor liver transplants, with 205 donor hepatectomies, as 1 living donor liver transplantation was a dual graft. Ten donors (4.88%) suffered complications. There was no difference in terms of age, gender, body weight, operation, and parenchymal time between those who had complications and those who did not. There was also no difference in liver function tests between the 2 groups of donors, but the total bilirubin was significantly higher in donors with complications. The graft weight and remnant liver volume were also similar. The proportion of donors with fatty liver was the same between the 2 groups. The mean blood loss in donors with complications was 170 +/- 79 mL, and that for donors without complications was 95 +/- 77 mL. There was a statistically significant greater blood loss in donors with complications (P < 0.05). The number of segments removed in donors with complications was also higher compared to donors without complications (P < 0.03). Using multivariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss and the number of segments removed were found to be independent risk factors for donor complications. Intraoperative blood loss during graft procurement must be kept low to minimize complications in donors.     

Significant role of middle hepatic vein in remnant liver regeneration of right-lobe living donors

For adult patients with end-stage liver disease, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of right-lobe grafts with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) has been increasingly used in recent years. We investigated the role of the MHV in donor remnant liver regeneration after right-lobe LDLT, which has not been described in previous studies. A total of eight living donors were included in this study of right-lobe LDLT. Four donors underwent right lobectomy (without MHV), and the remaining four underwent extended right lobectomy (with MHV). Regeneration of the donor remnant liver was assessed by volumetric computed tomography studies before and 90 days after LDLT. Comparison between the right-lobe and extended right-lobe donors did not show a clear-cut difference in the net increase of remnant liver volume at 3 months. However, the mean volume increase of the medial segment at the 90th postoperative day was 7% in the extended right-lobe donors and 61% in the right-lobe donors, showing a lower value in the remnant livers without MHV. The MHV plays a specific role in remnant liver regeneration of right-lobe living donors. We expect that this knowledge will contribute to securing a margin of safety in right-lobe LDLT.     

Analysis and Outcomes of Right Lobe Hepatectomy in 101 Consecutive Living Donors

The shortage of deceased organ donors has created a need for right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) in adults. Concerns regarding donor safety, however, necessitate continuous assessment of donor acceptance criteria and documentation of donor morbidity. We report the outcomes of our first 101 donors who underwent right lobectomy between April 2000 and November 2004. The cohort comprised 58 men and 43 women with a median age of 37.8 years (range: 18.6-55 years); median follow-up is 24 months. The middle hepatic vein (MHV) was taken with the graft in 55 donors. All complications were recorded prospectively and stratified by grade according to Clavien's classification. Overall morbidity rate was 37%; all complications were either grade 1 or 2, and the majority occurred during the first 30 days after surgery. Removal of the MHV did not affect morbidity rate. There were significantly fewer complications in the later half of our experience. All donors are well and have returned to full activities. With careful donor selection and specialized patient care, low morbidity rates can be achieved after right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation.     

Living donor liver transplantation with reduced monosegments for neonates and small infants

BACKGROUND: In pediatric living donor liver transplantation, left lateral segment or monosegmental graft is used to overcome size discrepancies between adult donors and pediatric recipients. For neonates and extremely small infants, however, problems related to large-for-size graft are sometimes encountered even when using such grafts. The reduced monosegmental graft, in which the caudal part of the monosegmental graft is resected, has been introduced to address this problem. METHODS: Of 566 children who underwent transplant between June 1990 and September 2004, reduced monosegment living donor liver transplants were used for nine patients (median age, 144 days; median weight, 4.1 kg). This technique was used for infants with estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > or =4.0% when using the left lateral segment. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival was 66.7%. GRWR was reduced from 7.45+/-2.70% to 3.39+/-0.89% using this modification. Transaminase levels at days 1 and 2 after transplantation were significantly higher in reduced monosegmental transplantation than in left lateral segmental transplantation. Hepatic artery thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis were observed in one case each. CONCLUSION: Reduced monosegmental living donor liver transplantation represents a feasible option for neonates and extremely small infants with liver failure.     

Liver regeneration and surgical outcome in donors of right-lobe liver grafts

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies of healthy live-liver donors have suggested that complete liver regeneration occurs within a matter of weeks; however, there have been no long-term studies evaluating liver regeneration and few studies documenting long-term donor outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one donors who provided right-lobe grafts underwent volumetric spiral computed tomography scans preoperatively and postoperatively at time intervals of 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient demographics, surgical data, and postoperative outcome were correlated with liver regeneration data. Donor surgical outcome was followed prospectively and recorded in a comprehensive database. RESULTS: Thirty-three males and 18 females (mean age 36.0+/-9.6 years) provided 51 right-lobe grafts. Mean follow-up was 9.8+/-3.4 months. No donor operation was aborted, and surgical morbidity and mortality rates were 39% and 0%, respectively. Donor remnant liver volume was 49.4+/-5.7% of the original total liver volume (TLV). Overall liver regeneration was 83.3+/-9.0% of the TLV by 1 year. Female donors had significantly slower liver regrowth when compared with males at 12 months (79.8+/-9.3% vs. 85.6+/-8.2%, P<0.01). There was no effect of age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, or perioperative liver function tests on liver regeneration. DISCUSSION: Liver regeneration continues throughout the first postoperative year. Only one donor achieved complete liver regeneration during this time period; however, all donors have maintained normal liver function without long-term complications. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether donors ever achieve original TLV.