共查询到16条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
目的 比较两种液体复苏方案对脓毒性休克(SS)患者呼吸力学与氧代谢功能的影响.方法 选取我院收治的SS患者98例,其中接受限制性液体复苏治疗的患者(观察组)45例,接受开放性液体复苏治疗的患者(对照组)53例,对比两组复苏治疗前、治疗后72 h呼吸力学、氧代谢、血流动力学指标以及药物使用情况.结果 治疗后,观察组静态肺... 相似文献
2.
危重病严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者早期规范化液体复苏治疗——多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
浙江省早期规范化液体复苏治疗协作组 《中国危重病急救医学》2010,22(6)
目的 探讨早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)对严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者的影响.方法 采用多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照研究方法,选择2005年1月至2008年1月浙江省8家三级甲等医院重症监护病房(ICU)住院的314例严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者,按随机数字表法分为常规组(151例)和EGDT组(163例).常规组以中心静脉压(CVP)、收缩压(SBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)、尿量变化指导液体复苏;EGDT组在此基础上增加中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)为观测指标进行复苏;对患者进行输液、输血和强等治疗,6 h内达标.比较两组患者28 d生存率、ICU住院病死率(主要终点)以及ICU住院时间、机械通气时间、抗生素使用时间、新发感染率和疾病严重程度评分(次要终点)的差异.结果 可供分析的有效病例中EGDT组为157例,常规组为146例.EGDT组28 d生存率较常规组增高约17.7%(75.2%比57.5%,P=0.001),EGDT组ICU住院病死率较常规组降低约15.7%(35.0%比50.7%,p=0.035).与常规组比较,EGDT能明显善患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分(分:14.4±8.5比18.0±7.1,P=0.043)、多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)评分(分:5.8±3.1比8.9±3.7,P=0.014)和感染相关器官功能衰竭评分系统(SOFA)评分(分:5.6±2.9比10.4±3.7,P=0.001),减少抗生素使用时间(d:13.4±10.0比19.7±13.5,P=0.004),降低新发感染的发生率(37.6%比53.4%,p=0.014);EGDT对ICU住院时间、机械通气间均无明显影响.结论 EGDT能显著改善ICU中严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克患者28 d生存率和临床疾病严重程度评分,减少抗生素使用时间及降低新发感染的发生率. 相似文献
3.
目的 观察液体复苏对创伤致严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者心肌损伤的影响,以及心肌损伤标志物对液体复苏的指导作用.方法 78例复合伤致严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者,急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分18 ~ 35分;记录治疗前及治疗3d、5d血清心肌肌钙蛋白Ⅰ(cTnI)、N末端-心室利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)及血流动力学参数,并进行相关性分析.结果 62.8%(49/78)的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者出现血清cTnI升高,73.5%(36/49)升高值大于界限值的2倍以上,30.6%( 15/49)超过界限值的4倍以上.入院时血清NT-proBNP升高者占46.2%(36/78),经液体复苏后继续升高者达74.4%(58/78).存活组(55例)治疗后血清cTnI、NT-proBNP、肺动脉楔压(PAWP)及心排血指数(CI)均明显改善;死亡组(23例)各指标无明显变化,且死亡组血清cTnI(μg/L)和NT-proBNP(ng/L)水平显著高于存活组(cTnI 3 d:2.09±1.00比1.57±0.93,5 d:1.78±0.67比0.72±0.51;NT-proBNP 3 d:3.52±0.73比3.16±0.65,5 d:3.21±0.66比2.66±0.58),CI( ml· s-1· m-2)明显低于存活组(3 d:57.6±6.2比68.3±5.6,5 d:40.5±4.7比80.7±6.8,均P<0.05).46例液体复苏达目标值的患者cTnI水平(μg/L)低于32例未达标者(1.16±0.62比1.97±0.76,P<0.05),且CI(ml ·s-1 ·m-2)明显增加(61.2±6.4比49.3±6.1,P<0.05),液体复苏是否达到目标值与血清NT-proBNP、PAWP无关.血清cTnI与NT-proBNP呈正相关(r=0.865,Y=2.069+ 0.695X,P<0.01),NT-proBNP与PAWP呈正相关(r=0.762,Y=1.125+ 4.929X,P<0.01),cTnI与CI呈负相关(r=-0.891,Y=50.623 -6.114X,P<0.01).结论 创伤致严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者有明显的心肌损伤,液体复苏可改善心肌损伤;血清cTnI和NT-proBNP与患者预后有关,NT-proBNP用于指导液体复苏的意义尚不能确定. 相似文献
4.
目的:探讨早期液体复苏容量对脓毒性休克的治疗意义。方法:定义正平衡即液体入量大于液体出量,负平衡即液体入量小于液体出量。回顾性分析80例脓毒性休克患者入院后24h和入院后72h液体复苏正平衡组及负平衡组的资料,分析两组间患者的预后。结果:入院后24h内负平衡组,负平衡液体量-218±21.4ml,死亡率显著低于正平衡组,正平衡液体量3206±57.9ml(P<0.01)。入院后72h内负平衡组,负平衡液体量-278±25.9ml,死亡率显著低于正平衡组,正平衡液体量5265±98.7ml(P<0.01)。结论:脓毒性休克患者早期液体复苏容量负平衡可以降低病死率。 相似文献
5.
浙江省早期规范化液体复苏治疗协作组 《中国危重病急救医学》2009,22(7):331-334
Objective To investigate the effect of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.Methods A multi-center, prospective, randomized,controlled study was deployed.Totally 314 critical patients, from eight comprehensive hospitals in Zhejiang Province admitted during January, 2005 to January, 2008, suffering from severe sepsis/septic shock were randomized into conventional treatment group (n=151) and EGDT group (n = 163), the patients of the former underwent fluid resuscitation guided by central venous pressure (CVP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mean artery pressure (MAP) and urinary output (UO), and the latter guided by CVP, SBP orMAP and UO plus central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2).The patients were treated with fluid, blood transfusions and cardiac stimulants in a period of 6 hours after enrollment to reach the goal.The difference of 28-day survival rate and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (primary end points), the length of ICU stay,the duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of antibiotics treatment, incidence of newly occurredinfection, and severity scores (secondary end points) were compared between two groups.Results Finally,a total of 303 patients were eligible to enter this study, with 157 patients in EGDT group and 146 patients in conventional treatment group.In comparison with conventional treatment group, the 28-day survival rate of EGDT group was increased by 17.7% (75.2% vs.57.5%, P=0.001) and the ICU mortality of EGDT group was decreased by 15.7% (35.0% vs.50.7%, P=0.035), the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ) score (14.4±8.5 vs.18.0±7.1, P=0.043), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score (5.8±3.1 vs.8.9±3.7, P=0.014) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (5.6 ± 2.9 vs.10.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.001) were significantly decreased in EGDT group.Meanwhile, a significant shortening of duration of using antibiotics was also found [(13.4±10.0) days vs.(19.7 ± 13.5) days, P = 0.004], with a lowering of incidence of occurrence of new infection (37.6% vs.53.4%, P=0.014).There were no differences in other parameters for secondary end points.Conclusion EGDT improves 28-day survival rate and clinical scores, and it shows beneficial effects on outcome of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. 相似文献
6.
浙江省早期规范化液体复苏治疗协作组 《中国危重病急救医学》2010,22(1):331-334
Objective To investigate the effect of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.Methods A multi-center, prospective, randomized,controlled study was deployed.Totally 314 critical patients, from eight comprehensive hospitals in Zhejiang Province admitted during January, 2005 to January, 2008, suffering from severe sepsis/septic shock were randomized into conventional treatment group (n=151) and EGDT group (n = 163), the patients of the former underwent fluid resuscitation guided by central venous pressure (CVP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mean artery pressure (MAP) and urinary output (UO), and the latter guided by CVP, SBP orMAP and UO plus central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2).The patients were treated with fluid, blood transfusions and cardiac stimulants in a period of 6 hours after enrollment to reach the goal.The difference of 28-day survival rate and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (primary end points), the length of ICU stay,the duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of antibiotics treatment, incidence of newly occurredinfection, and severity scores (secondary end points) were compared between two groups.Results Finally,a total of 303 patients were eligible to enter this study, with 157 patients in EGDT group and 146 patients in conventional treatment group.In comparison with conventional treatment group, the 28-day survival rate of EGDT group was increased by 17.7% (75.2% vs.57.5%, P=0.001) and the ICU mortality of EGDT group was decreased by 15.7% (35.0% vs.50.7%, P=0.035), the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ) score (14.4±8.5 vs.18.0±7.1, P=0.043), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score (5.8±3.1 vs.8.9±3.7, P=0.014) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (5.6 ± 2.9 vs.10.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.001) were significantly decreased in EGDT group.Meanwhile, a significant shortening of duration of using antibiotics was also found [(13.4±10.0) days vs.(19.7 ± 13.5) days, P = 0.004], with a lowering of incidence of occurrence of new infection (37.6% vs.53.4%, P=0.014).There were no differences in other parameters for secondary end points.Conclusion EGDT improves 28-day survival rate and clinical scores, and it shows beneficial effects on outcome of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. 相似文献
7.
脓毒性休克的死亡率居高不下,且无明显有效可行的治疗方法.最近,代谢复苏疗法备受瞩目,本文就脓毒性休克治疗时联合营养素补充措施的代谢复苏治疗的相关内容进行综述,为脓毒性休克的治疗提供新思路. 相似文献
8.
目的分析特利加压素对脓毒性休克患者心肺损伤、组织灌注及氧代谢指标的影响.方法所选120例脓毒性休克患者均为华中科技大学协和江北医院2017年3月至2019年3月收治,通过数字随机方法将其分成对照组与试验组(每组各60例);入院后两组患者均根据《成人脓毒性休克的血流动力学监测和支持指南》开展集束化治疗和早期监测,对照组给予去甲肾上腺素静脉持续泵入,试验组则给予去甲肾上腺素与特利加压素静脉持续泵入;观察分析患者的心肺损伤、组织灌注及氧代谢指标变化情况.结果与入组前比较,两组患者入组后96 h的氧合指数(oxygen index,OI)水平明显提高(P<0.05),肌酸激酶同工酶(creatine kinase isoenzyme,CK-MB)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cardiac troponin I,cTnI)、氨基末端B型利钠肽前体(N-terminal pro-brainnatriuretic peptide,NT-proBNP)水平则明显降低(P<0.05);而且入组后96 h试验组的CK-MB、cTnT、NT-proBNP水平明显低于对照组(t=2.524、4.719、9.031,P=0.013、0.001、0.001<0.05),OI水平明显高于对照组(t=5.666,P=0.000l).与入组前比较,两组入组后96 h的血乳酸(lactic acid,Lae)水平明显降低(P<0.05),中心静脉血氧饱和度(central venous oxygensaturation,ScvO2)、平均动脉压(average arterial pressure,MAP)、灌注指数(perfusion index,PI)水平明显提高(P<0.05);与对照组比较,试验组入组后96 h血Lac水平明显降低(P<0.05),而ScvO2、MAP及PI水平则明显上升(P<0.05).与对照组比较,试验组的机械通气时间、去甲肾上腺素使用时间、ICU住院时间均明显缩短(t=4.529、3.474、7.841,P=0.001、0.001、0.001),24h补液量明显减少(t=2.107,P=0.037).两组的临床病死率、不良反应发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论选择特利加压素治疗脓毒性休克患者,能改善氧代谢障碍和组织低灌注,有效保护器官功能,明显缩短ICU住院时间和机械通气时间,值得临床推广. 相似文献
9.
目的:观察代谢复苏疗法对于脓毒性休克患者的治疗效果。方法:纳入138例脓毒性休克患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组(69例)和试验组(69例)。对照组给予常规治疗,试验组在常规治疗的基础上联合给予氢化可的松+维生素C+维生素B1注射液。在治疗前和治疗后24、48 h检测血流动力学参数[平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)]。同时比较两组炎性因子的水平,随访预后。结果:治疗48 h后,试验组的中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)高于对照组,Lac、PCT、IL-6、TNF-α、APACHEⅡ评分以及SOFA评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。试验组的ICU治疗时间、总住院时间、血管活性药物应用时间、机械通气时间以及CRRT应用时间均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论:代谢复苏疗法能够改善脓毒性休克患者的氧化应激反应,清除炎症,预防器官功能障碍,并且能够减少血管活性药物的使用时间。 相似文献
10.
李亚红 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》2012,(17):5354-5355
乳酸是无氧酵解的产物,其变化反映了组织氧合代谢状况,国外研究显示,早期(6 h)动脉血乳酸清除率是评价严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者病死率较为敏感和特异的指标[1-2]。而血乳酸清除率在脓毒性休克患者治疗中的应用,目前国内报道不多。因此,本研究通过观察脓毒性休克患者早期以血乳酸清除率及 相似文献
11.
Evaluating vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in ED patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
Christina Le Frank Chu Ronald Dunlay Julian Villar Peter Fedullo Gabriel Wardi 《The American journal of emergency medicine》2018,36(8):1380-1385
Study objective
To determine the frequency and cause of inadequate initial antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department (ED), characterize its impact on patient outcomes, and identify patients who would benefit from an alternative initial empiric regimen.Methods
Retrospective cohort study conducted between 2012 and 2015 in which 342 patients with culture-positive severe sepsis or septic shock who received initial vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were reviewed to determine appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, risk factors for inappropriate use, and outcome data. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were determined to identify associations between inappropriate antibiotic use and outcomes and to identify risk factors that may predict which patients would benefit from an alternative initial regimen.Results
Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were inappropriate for 24% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, largely due to non-susceptible infections, particularly ESBL organisms and Clostridium difficile. Risk factors included multiple sources of infection (OR 4.383), admission from a skilled nursing facility (OR 3.763), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 3.175), intra-abdominal infection (OR 2.890), and immunosuppression (OR 1.930). We did not find a mortality impact.Conclusion
Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were an inappropriate antibiotic combination for approximately 24% of patients with either severe sepsis or septic shock in the ED. Patients with known COPD, residence at a skilled nursing facility, a history concerning for Clostridium difficile, and immunosuppression would benefit from an alternative regimen. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings. 相似文献12.
为探讨在缺乏有创性监测手段的情况下,通过记录、分析脓毒性休克患者各项基础生命体征数据的动态变化,是否可预判患者的"扩容临界点",指导临床液体复苏方案,笔者对临床上脓毒性休克患者的生命体征数据进行回顾性整理分析,结合血流动力学、组织氧合、脏器功能、影像学结果等指标来判断"扩容临界点"。结果显示脓毒性休克患者的容量状态与生命体征数据变化存在显著相关性,可以通过分析生命体征数据结合血流动力学、组织氧合指标来判断"扩容临界点"。可见"扩容临界点"在脓毒性休克患者液体复苏中具有一定指导意义,但也需要更多的证据来支持。 相似文献
13.
目的 调查严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克在急诊患者中的发生率以及针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期集束化治疗的依从性.方法 选择2009年5月至6月由救护车送至上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院急诊科的患者为调查对象,统计严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生率,对符合诊断标准的患者分别统计早期复苏集束化治疗各项指标完成的依从性.结果 共纳入急诊就诊患者917例,其中符合严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克诊断标准者96例,发生率为10.47%.在符合诊断标准的患者中,早期复苏集束化治疗、使用抗菌药物前留取病原学标本、2 h内放置深静脉导管并监测中心静脉压(CVP)与中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、3 h内使用广谱抗菌药物、6 h内早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)达标、12 h内乳酸下降或原乳酸≤2 mmol/L的依从性分别为1.04%、3.12%、2.08%、83.33%、1.04%、23.96%,急诊内科各指标的依从性依次为1.19%、3.57%、2.38%、83.33%、1.19%、26.19%,急诊外科各指标的依从性依次为0、0、0、83.33%、0、8.33%,急诊内、外科依从性比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克在急诊就诊患者中占相当比例,但医师的认识不足;早期集束化治疗依从性较低,需加大指南的教育及执行程度.Abstract: Objective To evaluate the occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock and the rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department.Methods A prospective study was conducted on consecutive adult patients who were sent to Emergency Department of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine by ambulance from May to June in 2009. The occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock, and the number of the patients in whom who met the criteria of compliance with sepsis bundle were analyzed. Results Nine hundred and seventeen patients who were sent to the emergency department by ambulance in that period were enrolled in the study.The number of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock was 96. The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was 10.47%. Among these patients, the number of patients in whom the sepsis bundle was complied,i.e. sepsis bundle, appropriate cultures were taken before antimicrobial therapy, placement of central venous catheter and monitoring of central venous pressure(CVP)as well as central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2)within 2 hours, antibiotic therapy within 3 hours, early goal-directed therapy(EGDT)within 6 hours, and lactate clearance in 12 hours reached 1.04%, 3. 12%, 2.08%, 83. 33%, 1.04%, 23.96%.The results were 1.19%, 3. 57%, 2.38%, 83.33%, 1.19%, 26.19% and 0, 0, 0, 83.33%, 0, 8. 33% in medical and surgical emergency department respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two divisions(all P>0. 05). Conclusion The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was high in emergency department, but the rate of recognition of it and the compliance with sepsis bundle were inadequate. It is urgently necessary to enhance the learning and implementation of the guideline. 相似文献
14.
目的 研究严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者复苏治疗与应用胰岛素强化治疗应激性高血糖之间的关系,探讨非线性观点在脓毒症患者治疗中的价值.方法 回顾性分析129例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的住院资料,根据充分复苏标准完成所需时间(每6 h一组)分为8组,采用非线性最小二乘法比较各复苏组充分复苏完成所需时问与单位时间胰岛素用量之间的关系.结果 各复苏组充分复苏完成所需时间与单位时间胰岛素用量之间存在指数回归关系,指数曲线方程(^y)=e0.7393-0.0152x(a=0.739 3,b=0.015 2),且拟合度甚佳(R2=0.976 943 6).结论 在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗过程中,复苏治疗完成的时问与机体紊乱的内分泌系统恢复有密切的关系,符合非线性观点.因此治疗上重在帮助机体重建已紊乱的网络,恢复其正常的生理谐振;而不仅仅是给予受损器官充分的支持和修复. 相似文献
15.
重症肺炎及感染性休克的集束治疗 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
目的 探讨国内严重感染集束治疗的疗效.方法 在广州医学院附属第二医院呼吸重症监护病房中选用43例重症肺炎及感染性休克患者,进行14个月(2006年11月1日至2007年12月31日)前瞻性观察研究.患者入进标准参照2001年国际脓毒症会议.分教育、试验和运作3个连续阶段实施6 h严重感染集束治疗和24 h严重感染集束治疗.历史对照期内(2004年1月1日至2006年10月31日)合格患者门入对照组.计最资料以(x±s)表示,计数资料以率表爪.采用γ2检验、独立样本t榆验、配对t检验、单因素和多冈素Logistic回归分析,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义.结果 1)对照组和集束治疗组问的基础特征差异基本上无统计学意义.2)血清乳酸测定率、休克业组液体复苏率及6 h内所输入液体量、血糖榨制,与对照组相比较,其差异均有统计学意义(P值分别是0.024,0.009,0.045和0.000).3)72 h时,集束治疗组呼吸频率和氧合指数,与对照组相比较,其差异均有统计学意义(P值分别是0.033和0.041);集束治疗组中休克业绀急性生理和慢性疾病评分(A-PACHE)Ⅱ分值和预计死亡率的下降值,与对照组中休克业组比较,其差异均有统计学意义(P值分别是0.017和0.040).4)与对照组比较,集束治疗组病死率绝对值下降23.30%(P=0.019).结论 严重感染集束治疗能显著降低重症肺炎及感染性休克患者病死率. 相似文献
16.
目的 研究强制性脓毒症治疗流程对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响.方法 前瞻性研究2008年6月至2009年12月就诊于两个三级教学医院急诊科的严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者195例;应用拯救脓毒症运动标准数据库(SSC database)研究脓毒症患者临床的特点、治疗和预后.纳人标准:符合SSC database诊断标准.2008年6月至12月就诊患者进行现况调查,依据临床医师经验治疗,为对照组.2009年1月至12月间就诊患者采用强制性脓毒症治疗流程治疗,即治疗组.比较强制性脓毒症治疗流程实施前后两组住院病死率.采用SPSS 15.0软件进行数据分析.组间比较采用独立样本t检验.计数资料以率和构成比表示,采用χ2检验.用Kaplan-Meier进行生存曲线分析,以P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义.结果 治疗组[98.3%(115/117)]与对照组[2.56%(2/78)]比较显著提高血乳酸的检测率(P<0.01);治疗组69.2%(81/117)患者可以在来诊3 h内给予抗生素,对照组为35.8%(28/78)(P<0.01);治疗组[47.9%(56/117)]与对照组[25.6%(20/78)]比较显著增加抗生素应用前血培养送检率(P=0.003);治疗组[80.3%(53/66)]与对照组[27%(10/37)]比较显著增加标准液体复苏率,P<0.01;治疗组[8.1%(3/37)]与对照组[27.3%(18/66)]比较中心静脉压达标率增加(P=0.023);治疗组[29.1%(34/117)]与对照组[44.8%(35/78)]比较住院病死率显著下降(P=0.032).结论 强制性实施脓毒症治疗流程提高了严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克标准治疗依从性,住院病死率下降15.7%.Abstract: Objective To study the impact of therapy strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and/or septic shock. Method A total of 195 patients diagnosed as severe sepsis or septic shock were enrolled for prospective study from June 2008 to December 2009. Patient's clinical manifestation,treatments and outcomes were studied by using SSC database. Patients were divided into control group and treatment group. In control group, patients enrolled from June 2008 to December 2008, were treated with conventional medical care In treatment group, patients enrolled from January 2009 to December 2009 were treated with a novel algorithm of mandatory treatment for sepsis In-hospital mortality of two groups was compared. SPSS15.0 software was used for analysis of data. Chi-square test and unpaired t-test were used for comparisons between groups. Results Compared to the control group The need for blood lactate test was significantly grown in treatment group [98.2% (115/117) versus 2.56% (2/78), P < 0.001]. Antibiotics was administered to 69.2% (81/117) patients of treatment group within 3 hours after their arrival at the emergency department compared to 35.8% (28/78) in the control group (P < 0. 001). Blood cultures made before antibiotics given were 47.9% (56/117) in the treatment group compared to the control group 25.6%(20/78), P = 0. 003. The rate of fluid resuscitation was 80.3% (53/66) in the treatment group and 27%(10/37) in the control group, P <0.001. The rate of CVP (8 mmHg was 27.3% (18/66) in the treatment group and 8.1% (3/37) in the control group, P = 0. 023. In-hospital mortality was 29.1% (34/117) in the treatment group and 44.8% (35/78) in the control group, P =0. 032. Conclusions The algorithm of mandatory treatment for sepsis improved the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment for severe sepsis and septic shock, decreasing in-hospital mortality. 相似文献