“健康中国2020战略研究报告”对我国健康教育事业发展的几点启示

2012年发布的《健康中国2020战略研究报告》（简称《2020战略报告》）[1]明确提出：＂将健康教育与健康促进作为公共卫生十大关键策略之一＂,＂坚持预防为主,适应并推动医学模式转变＂,显示了国家从战略层面对公共卫生与健康教育和健康促进的空前重视,     

临沂市健康教育与健康促进远期规划的工作思路

健康教育是公民素质教育的重要内容,是公共卫生体系建设的重要组成部分。为了适应临沂市全面建设小康社会,促进经济社会的全面发展和全面提高人口健康素质的客观要求,依据《全国健康教育与健康促进工作规划纲要》,探索、构思了未来五年中临沂市健康教育与健康促进规划的工作思路。     

关于举办“突发公共卫生事件健康教育与健康促进培训班”的预通知

为更好地贯彻《全国健康教育与健康促进工作规划纲要(2005-2010年)》,提高各级健康教育机构应对突发公共卫生事件的能力,江苏省疾病预防控制中心申报了国家级继续医学教育项目“突发公共卫生事件健康教育与健康促进培训班”(项目编号2006-12-07002),拟定于2006年7月中旬在江苏省南京市举办,时间约6天。本培训班将邀请全国著名的健康教育专家授课。授课内容涉及健康教育与健康促进的基本理论和基本技能,健康教育在应对突发公共卫生事件中的作用和方法等内容。培训方式为:采用参与式教学法,以解决实际问题为目标,就突发公共卫生事件期间的健康…     

突发公共卫生事件应对的健康教育与健康促进(二)

国外应对突发公共卫生事件的健康教育与健康促进1 突发公共卫生事件中健康教育与健康促进的组织机构、信息系统、队伍以及技术、人员、物资储备( 1)组织机构 :美国健康教育机构有一套完整的系统 ,包括国家级健康教育机构、地方健康教育机构以及非政府的健康教育机构。国家级的健康教育机构包括 :卫生、教育、福利部的健康教育局(内设健康促进中心 ,负责协调部内业务司局和联邦政府各有关健康教育和健康促进的活动 )、纽约国家健康教育中心 (是全国健康教育的业务中心 ,负责健康教育战略和规划的制定 ,开展有关研究 )和总统健康教育委员会 (…     

健康教育与健康促进工作在基层疾病预防机构中存在的问题及对策

健康教育与健康促进是疾病预防控制体系的重要组成部分．是公共卫生服务的一项基本职能,在传染病和慢性非传染性疾病的预防与控制、应对突发公共卫生事件等工作中发挥着重要作用。为了提高广大民众的健康水平和全民族的健康素质．我们对此项工作存在的问题及应对策略做了初步的探讨。1健康教育与健康促进工作中存在的问题     

“’2012国家基本公共卫生服务·健康教育学术论坛”征文活动正式启动

<正>为顺应我国深化医药卫生体制改革的需要,积极探讨国家基本公共卫生服务与健康教育中的热点、难点问题,强化国家基本公共卫生服务与健康教育的学术交流,更好地促进我国基本公共卫生服务均等化中的健康教育和健康促进工作,由中国健     

关于举办“突发公共卫生事件健康教育与健康促进培训班”的预通知

为更好地贯彻《全国健康教育与健康促进工作规划纲要（2005-2010年）》，提高各级健康教育机构应对突发公共卫生事件的能力，江苏省疾病预防控制中心申报了国家级继续医学教育项目“突发公共卫生事件健康教育与健康促进培训班”（项目编号2006-12-07002），拟定于2006年7月中旬在江苏省南京市举办，时间约6天。     

关于基本公共卫生服务健康教育项目的实施与思考

<正>健康教育与健康促进是公共卫生服务的重要组成部分,是促进基本公共卫生服务逐步均等化的重要内容[1]。本文对国家基本公共卫生服务健康教育项目的实施内容和方法等进行总结与分析,仅供同行     

健康促进学校口腔卫生健康教育的实施效果评估

《中小学健康教育指导纲要》明确指出:进一步加强学校健康教育工作,培养学生的健康意识与公共卫生意识,掌握健康知识和技能,促进学生养成健康的行为和生活方式[1]。世界卫生组织推     

青少年健康素养评价工具研究现状及展望

健康素养与突发公共卫生事件的应对密切相关，研究以评价工具为切入点，重点综述了青少年健康素养评价工具、突发公共卫生事件视域下青少年健康素养评价工具研究现状。建议在突发公共卫生事件视域下加强青少年健康素养评价工具的开发，加强健康教育和提升健康素养，有利于青少年更好地应对突发性公共卫生事件，维护身心健康。     

突发公共卫生事件健康促进联动机制的探索

在当前健康教育工作人员不足、经费紧张的状况下,如何应对突发公共卫生事件的挑战是一个值得深思和研究的课题。探索建立跨行政区域的健康促进应对联动机制,集中相邻或周边行政区域的健康教育工作人员和队伍,形成健康教育协作区,有效提高应对突发公共卫生事件的能力。     

浅谈突发公共卫生事件应对中健康促进工作的策略

突发公共卫生事件,是指一些突然发生的,可能或者已经造成社会重大传染病疫情、不明原因的群体性疾病或者造成大量人群食物中毒或者其他严重影响公众健康的紧急事件。在我国2003年颁布的《突发公共卫生事件紧急条例》中对其特征进行了定义:一是具有突发性;二是在公共卫生领域发生;三是严重危害公众健康。在面对突发公共卫生事件发生后,应该及时对事件进行分析、处置,开展广泛深入的健康教育和健康促进工作,可促进公众正确应对灾害,提高自我的防护意识和能力,可以对事件造成的损失进行补救,减少对社会、经济、政治和人民群众生命财产的损害,有利于维护公众健康和社会秩序。对于突发公共卫生事件,除了在发生之后及时应对以外,在平时要开展健康促进工作,对突发公共卫生事件进行预防,并且在其不可避免的发生时,将其危害降到最低。该文对突发公共卫生事件应对中健康促进工作进行探讨。     

Health education: a case for resuscitation

Health education is the component of health promotion designed to achieve learning related to health or illness. While often described by other names, an educational element features in nearly all health promotion activities. Unlike most other public health actions, it focuses on voluntarism and frequently on the individual. Health education and the resources devoted to it grew rapidly in the latter half of the 20th century. However, in the 1970s, many health educators started to question its value. They criticized it as being excessively concerned with disease, victim blaming, politically naive and increasing health inequalities. While promoting knowledge and skills for health was included as one of the five principles of health promotion in the World Health Organization's Ottawa charter, it received much less attention than the other four principles. Health education was also criticized as being ineffective. Methods for evaluating health education are hotly contested but there is evidence that some education interventions are effective. Current health strategies continue to advocate prevention through health education, and workers in many different settings are expected to ensure that health education is provided. These front-line educators should be able to look to those who specialize in health promotion to support their educational activities. This paper argues that the worth of health education compared with other forms of health promotion has been grossly underestimated and it is time to re-assert its importance.     

Framework for the strategic and business planning of the Centre – School of Public Health, Belgrade

The science and practice of the New Public Health have a key role in the promotion of people’s health and in the reform of the health system. Serbia experienced many social and economic threats to public health during the 1990s when the health infrastructure both for curative and preventive services gradually deteriorated. Existing skills and knowledge of public health professionals are insufficient in virtually all fields of public health activities. The foundation of the Centre – School of Public Health, within the Medical School of Belgrade University has been a precondition for the improvement of professional training in public health. The objectives are described as (1) education of capable experts in the field of public health, (2) improvement of knowledge in the health sciences, (3) health promotion in cooperation with local communities, (4) training of competent researchers in the field of public health and (5) improvement of the process of decision making and policy formulation. The training programme covers five key areas of education in the domain of public health: (1) public health in Europe, (2) epidemiology and biostatistics, (3) health policy and management, (4) health promotion, health education and social sciences and (5) environment and health. In the first year, 27 students were admitted for the Master of Public Health programme and more than 350 participants attended various short courses for continuing education in public health and health management based on applied learning approach. The next developmental steps focus on sustainability of the programmes for continuing education and research and a wider national and international partnership.     

Health promotion in Brazil

The evolution of health promotion within the Brazilian health system is examined, including an assessment of the intersectoral and development policies that have influenced the process. Particular attention is paid to the legal characteristics of the Unified Health System. Human resources formation and research initiatives in health promotion are outlined, with a summary of the obstacles that need to be overcome in order to ensure the effective implementation of health promotion in the future. Up to the end of the 20th Century health promotion was not used as a term in the Brazilian public heath context. Health promoting activities were concentrated in the area of health education, although targeting the social determinants of health and the principle of intersectoral action were part of the rhetoric. The situation has changed during the last decade, with the publication of a national policy of health promotion, issued by the Ministry of Health and jointly implemented with the States and Municipals Health Secretaries. More recently there has been a re-emergence of the discourse on the social determinants of health and the formation of intersectoral public policies as the basis of a comprehensive health promotion. Health promotion infrastructure, particularly around human resources and financing, requires strengthening in order to ensure capacity and sustainability in health promotion practice.     

上海市基层健康促进队伍健康促进能力调查

采用普查和随机抽样调查,对上海市健康城市建设的基层健康促进队伍结构及其个人健康促进能力分析显示:年龄偏大、学历偏低、缺乏医学专业背景;个人健康促进能力总体良好,个人资源偏低。因此,建议构建老中青结合的年轻化结构,鼓励健康促进专业技能培训,开拓健康促进资源,提高健康促进能力。     

健康教育与健康促进在基本职业卫生服务中的作用

目的分析在开展基本职业卫生服务过程中开展健康教育与健康促进工作对职业病防制的效果，提出下一步的工作策略。方法加大投入、依靠基层三级网络体系开展针对职业病防制的多种形式的健康教育工作。结果职业病防制知识得到普及，职业病危害事故和职业病发病率大幅度下降，达到了基本职业卫生服务，形成良好的社会氛围。结论采取综合措施，形成健康促进的宏观战略，促进了职业病防制工作。     

三明市健康教育与健康促进工作模式研究

为研究如何开展健康教育与健康促进的工作模式,作者系统收集分析三明市开展健康教育与健康促进的工作成效、工作思路与经验做法。该市总结出确定一个龙头地位,健全二支骨干队伍,依托三大新闻媒体,结合四大活动内容,利用五大运行载体的工作模式,已成为当前推动三明市健康教育与健康促进的最有效策略之一。     

儿童健康教育与健康促进

儿童健康面临的挑战给新时代的儿童健康促进提出了更高的要求。本文从对儿童健康现状分析出发,概述了儿童健康教育的意义、内容、方法与实践情况,以及国内外的研究进展,并对新世纪我国儿童健康促进做了展望。     

北京市怀柔区健康促进社区(农村)工作可持续发展模式探讨

目的探讨怀柔区健康促进社区(农村)工作可持续发展模式。方法 2009年在怀柔区14个镇乡、2个街道共计70个健康促进示范社区(农村)中,以建立健康教育组织机构和网络、培训专(兼)职健康教育工作者、建立健康促进工作制度、经费投入和综合信息传播等为干预措施。调查干预前健康相关知识行为的改变情况。结果健康知识平均知晓率由干预前的51.6%提高到干预后的74.5%;健康行为形成率由干预前的56.5%提高到干预后的71.8%,各项指标干预前后差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论通过上述干预措施证明,"政府规划,社区动员,群众参与,信息传播,目标管理"是怀柔区健康促进社区(农村)工作可持续发展的模式。