Prostate-specific antigen velocity and prostate cancer gleason grade and stage

BACKGROUND: Increased preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) has been associated with increased prostate cancer mortality and higher Gleason scores. The authors evaluated the relation between PSAV, biopsy Gleason score, and pathologic stage in men who were enrolled in a prostate cancer screening trial. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 1441 men who were enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial who received > or =2 PSA screens and were diagnosed with prostate cancer within 1 year of the last screen. PSAV was estimated by using all screening PSA values within 6 years prediagnosis. RESULTS: Both PSA and PSAV were related to biopsy Gleason score. The multivariable odds ratios (OR), controlling for PSA and demographics, for having a Gleason score of 7 to 10 were 1.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.9-1.9), 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.3), and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4-3.9) for men with PSAV values from 0.5 to 1 ng/mL per year, from 1 to 2 ng/mL per year, and >2 ng/mL per year, respectively, compared with men who had PSAV values <0.5 ng/mL per year. The median PSAV was 0.60 ng/mL per year for men with Gleason scores from 2 to 6 versus 0.84 ng/mL per year for men with Gleason scores from 7 to 10 (P < .0001). Among 658 men who underwent prostatectomy, both PSA and PSAV were associated with advanced pathologic stage in univariate analyses; however, when the analysis controlled for clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score, the associations of PSA and PSAV were no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: PSAV and PSA levels were associated independently with biopsy Gleason score. Among men who underwent prostatectomy, PSAV and PSA were not predictive of advanced pathologic stage when the analysis was controlled for biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage. It cannot be determined yet whether PSAV is predictive of long-term prostate cancer outcome in this cohort.     

Predicting prostate specific antigen failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy for T1c prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Clinicopathological data were reviewed to find a predictor of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure in Taiwanese patients who had received radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for stage T1c prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive men who underwent RRP for stage T1c PC were included. The clinical end point was PSA failure (PSA >0.2 ng/ml). Preoperative PSA, free-to-total PSA ratio, prostate volume, PSA density, transrectal sextant biopsy and whole mount of RRP parameters were analyzed for their ability to predict postoperative PSA failure. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 55 patients developed PSA failure during the follow-up period. Those with PSA failure had higher PSA, higher percentage of cancer in biopsies and higher biopsy Gleason score than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). The PSA failure group had higher pathology Gleason score and a higher incidence of extracapsular tumor extension than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). The PSA failure group had a larger tumor volume and higher incidence of combined peripheral lobe with transitional lobe involvement than the freedom from PSA failure group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the predictors for PSA failure after RRP were biopsy Gleason score > or =6, tumor volume > or =2.5 ml and PSA > or =10 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: The single most significant predictor for PSA failure in T1c PC patients after RRP was tumor volume > or =2.5 ml.     

Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas

Purpose: There is ongoing discussion as to the necessity for certain surgical procedures being limited to high through-put institutions. To cast light on this question regarding use of open as compared to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) the present study was conducted focusing on biochemical (PSA) recurrence-free survival of Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate carcinomas. Materials and Methods: From April 2004 to December 2010 we identified 579 patients undergoing LRP (n=245) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) (n=334) who did not undergo immediate adjuvant therapy (radiation and/or hormonal) and whose PSA levels were lower than 25 ng/ml. Preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score and pathological features were assessed and Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival were compared. A Cox regression model analysis was performed to determine predictors of biochemical recurrence. Results: Median follow up was 35 months(2- 115). On univariate analysis the LRP group had a slightly lower pathological T stage (p<0.001), higher biopsy Gleason score (p<0.001), but much more organ confined disease (p=0.001) than the RRP group. BCR-free survival did not significantly differ between LRP and RRP groups with preoperative PSA <6, clinical stage T1c,T2a, pathological stage T3 or more, biopsy Gleason score of 8 or more, pathological Gleason score of 6 or less and 8 or more, extra-capsular extension and negative surgical margin. The 3-year BCR-free survival rates were 91.0%(RRP) and 82.2%(LRP) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that in general LRP may be associated with a less positive outcome than BCR for resection of low risk prostate cancers. Therefore indications for LRP should be very carefully monitored.     

The impact of the biopsy Gleason score on PSA outcome for prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml and T1c,2a: implications for patient selection for prostate-only therapy

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the ability of the biopsy Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and the 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) clinical T-stage for predicting time to postoperative PSA failure for patients with a PSA < or =10 ng/ml and T1c or T2a disease. Specific attention is given to the patient subgroup with biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A concordance map of the biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason grades and a clinical-pathologic correlation of the PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and 1992 AJCC T-stage and pathologic stage were performed. A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the ability of the biopsy Gleason score, PSA, and 1992 AJCC T-stage to predict time to PSA failure for 457 men managed with a radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: The absence of prostatectomy Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease was noted in 71%, 50%, and 11% of patients with biopsy Gleason score 2-6, 3 + 4, and > or =4 + 3 disease respectively while pathologic evidence of seminal vesicle invasion was noted in 2%, 4%, and 17% of these patients respectively. Estimates of 5-year PSA failure-free survival rates were not statistically different for patients with biopsy Gleason score 2-6 vs. 3 + 4 (79% vs. 81%; p = 0.93), but were significantly different for patients having biopsy Gleason score 2-6 vs. 4 + 3 (79% vs. 62%; p = 0.04) or 2-6 vs. 8-10 (79% vs. 18%; p = 0.0001) prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Based on the pathologic stage and PSA control data following RP, patients with biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 disease and PSA < or =10 ng/ml and 1992 AJCC T1c or T2a disease may be suitable candidates for radiation therapy directed at the prostate only.     

血清PSA及超声引导穿刺活检对前列腺癌病理分期预测价值研究

目的 研究血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及超声引导穿刺活检对前列腺癌病理分期的预测价值.方法 选取200例经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检确诊为前列腺癌的患者的临床资料进行研究.分析患者的血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分3个参数与前列腺癌病理分期的相关性;同时对比性分析以上3个参数在不同病理分期前列腺癌患者中的差异情况.结果 血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分均与前列腺癌患者的病理分期呈正相关(P﹤0.001);D期前列腺癌患者的血清PSA水平明显高于A期、B期、C期前列腺癌患者(P﹤0.05),而A期、B期、C期前列腺癌患者的血清PSA水平两两之间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);C期与D期前列腺癌患者的穿刺活检阳性百分数比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05),而其他各分期间穿刺活检阳性百分数两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);A期与C期、B期与C期、A期与D期、B期与D期前列腺癌患者的Gleason评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),而A期与B期、C期与D期前列腺癌患者的Gleason评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).结论 血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分均可单独用于前列腺期病理分期的预测,同时该3个参数在区分前列腺癌病理分期方面也发挥一定辅助作用.     

Prostate Cancer Incidence in Turkey: An Epidemiological Study

Background: This study aimed to determine the incidence of prostate cancer in Turkey in a population-basedsample, and to determine clinical and pathological characteristics of the cases. Materials and Methods: Allnewly diagnosed prostate cancer patients were included in this national, multi-centered, prospective and noninterventionalepidemiological registry study conducted in 12 cities representing the 12 regions of Turkey fromJuly 2008 to June 2009. The population-based sample comprised 4,150 patients with a recent prostate cancerdiagnosis. Results: Age-adjusted prostate cancer incidence rate was 35 cases per 100,000 in Turkey. At the timeof diagnosis, median age was 68, median PSA level was 10.0 ng/mL. Digital rectal examination was abnormal in36.2% of 3,218 tested cases. Most patients had urologic complaints. The main diagnostic method was transrectalultrasound guided biopsy (87.8%). Gleason score was ≤6 in 49.1%, 7 in 27.8% and >7 in 20.6% of the cases.There was a statistically significant positive correlation between serum PSA level and Gleason score (p=0.000).The majority of patients (54.4%) had clinical stage T1c. Conclusions: This is the first population-based nationaldata of incidence with the histopathological characteristics of prostate cancer in Turkey. Prostate cancer remainsan important public health concern in Turkey with continual increase in the incidence and significant burdenon healthcare resources.     

Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer in Japanese men diagnosed on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy

Background The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological features of prostate cancer detected on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided random biopsy in comparison with those detected on initial biopsy.Methods Between January 1999 and March 2004, 132 Japanese men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy at our institution. In 109 patients (group A) prostate cancer was detected on initial biopsy, while in the remaining 23 (group B), it was diagnosed on repeat biopsy. We retrospectively characterized differences in clinicopathological features between these two groups.Results There were no significant differences in age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) value, or biopsy Gleason score between groups A and B. However, prostate volume in group A was significantly smaller than that in group B, while PSA density, the percentage of positive biopsy cores, and the percentage of cancers in the biopsy set in group A were significantly higher than those in group B. Pathological examination of the radical prostatectomy specimens showed that there were no significant differences in the distribution of pathological T stage or in the Gleason score; or in the incidences of lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion between groups A and B. Despite there being a significantly larger tumor volume in the radical prostatectomy specimens in group A compared to that in group B, there was no significant difference in the incidence of insignificant disease between these two groups.Conclusion These findings suggest that missing the cancer on the initial needle biopsy may be due to a small cancer focus in a large prostate; however, there were no significant differences in the final pathological features of prostate cancers detected on the initial and repeat biopsies, suggesting similar biological behaviors. Thus performance of a repeat biopsy in cases negative for malignancy on the initial biopsy is advocated.Missing prostate cancer on the initial biopsy may be due to a small cancer focus in a large prostate; however prostate cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsies may have similar biological behavior.     

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients. RESULTS: The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy. CONCLUSION: Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.     

Ten-year survival after radical prostatectomy: specimen Gleason score is the predictor in organ-confined prostate cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

Pathologic findings and prostate specific antigen outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients diagnosed on the basis of a single microscopic focus of prostate carcinoma with a gleason score </= 7

BACKGROUND: Whether patients who are diagnosed on the basis of a single microscopic focus of prostate carcinoma with a Gleason score 相似文献   

The clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome following external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: An investigation was performed of the clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome following external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for men with PSA-detected or clinically palpable prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether the percent of positive prostate biopsies provided clinically relevant information about PSA outcome following external beam RT in 473 men while accounting for the previously established risk groups based on the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) clinical T stage. RESULTS: Controlling for the known prognostic factors, the percent of positive prostate biopsies added clinically significant information (p = 0.02) regarding time to PSA failure following RT. Specifically, 76% of the patients in the intermediate risk group (1992 AJCC T(2b) or biopsy Gleason 7 or PSA > 10 ng/mL and < or = 20 ng/mL) could be classified into either an 30% or 85% 5-year PSA control cohort using the preoperative prostate biopsy data. CONCLUSION: The previously validated stratification of PSA outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP) using the percent of positive prostate biopsies in intermediate-risk patients is also clinically significant for men treated with external beam RT. The percent positive prostate biopsies should be considered in conjunction with the PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and 1992 AJCC clinical T stage when counseling patients with newly diagnosed and clinically localized prostate cancer about PSA outcome following RP or external beam RT.     

Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/ml are at high risk of progression after radical prostatectomy. Comparison has seldom been made between the outcomes of patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and those with PSA >50 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these two groups. METHODS: From 1993 to 2002, 60 prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml were assigned to Group I. Twenty-three patients with PSA >50 ng/ml were assigned to Group II. Preoperatively, Group II had greater PSA and PSA density than Group I (P < 0.0001). Group II had higher biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage than Group I (P < 0.05). Pathological categories and outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: Group II had higher Gleason score and tumor volume than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of organ-confined diseases was 29.7% in Group I and 0% in Group II (P < 0.05). Group II had higher incidence of extracapsular tumor extension, positive surgical margin and lymph node involvement than Group I (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative PSA >0.01 ng/ml and PSA failure were higher in Group II than Group I (P < 0.05). Need for adjuvant treatment and death from prostate cancer was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with PSA >50 ng/ml had a poorer prognosis than patients with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml. Those with PSA >50 ng/ml had shorter freedom from PSA failure survivals than those with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml (P = 0.004). Classification of high-risk prostate patients into two sub-groups with PSA 20.1-50 ng/ml and PSA >50 ng/ml should be considered.     

A prospective study of the serum prostate specific antigen concentrations and Gleason histologic scores of black and white men with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The stage specific survival rates of black American men with prostate carcinoma are less favorable than those of white American men. The authors conducted a prospective study of the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations and Gleason histologic scores of black and white men with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma to determine whether there were racial differences in these prognostic variables. METHODS: At a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, clinical stage, Gleason histologic score, serum PSA concentration, prostate volume, and PSA density were determined for 796 consecutive men (465 black and 331 white) who had biopsy-detected prostate carcinoma. RESULTS: The percentages, respectively, of black and white men with local, regional, and metastatic carcinoma were 58 and 72; 22 and 17; and 20 and 11 (P < 0.0001). Of 271 black and 329 white men with local stage cancer, 20% and 12%, respectively, had Gleason 8-10 tumors (P = 0.02), and the age-adjusted risk of Gleason 8-10 cancer was 1.39 times greater for black men (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.93). Gleason 8-10 cancer was found in 12 of 68 black (18%) and 5 of 87 white (6%) men with local cancer who were age 65 years or younger (P = 0.02). Among black and white men with local stage cancer, the mean PSA was 12.9 (95% CI = 11.5-14.4) and 8.5 (95% CI = 7.6-9.4) ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.0001), and among black and white men with regional stage cancer the mean PSA was 53.3 (95% CI = 42.7-63.9) and 35.0 (95% CI = 27.3-42.6) ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.02). The mean PSA of black and white men with local cancer who were age 65 years or younger was 11.6 (95% CI = 8.8-14.4) and 6.9 (95% CI = 5.9-8.0) ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in the risk of Gleason score 8-10 cancer for black and white men with local stage disease and in the serum PSA concentrations of black and white men with local and regional stage disease help to explain racial differences in cancer survival. Racial differences in the risk of Gleason 8-10 cancer and in the serum PSA concentrations of men age 65 years or younger have implications regarding the potential benefits of screening for prostate carcinoma in the African American community.     

African-American men with nonpalpable prostate cancer exhibit greater tumor volume than matched white men

BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer (PC) mortality disproportionately affects African-American (AA) men, limited data exist comparing the pathologic characteristics of white and AA patients with nonpalpable PC (clinical stage T1c). METHODS: The authors reviewed the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from 37 consecutive AA men with clinical stage T1c PC and 35 white men who were matched for age, clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, year of surgery, prostate weight, and prostate biopsy strategy. Pathologic characteristics were compared after mapping tumor foci and calculating tumor volumes by using computer software. RESULTS: For AA men, the median age (57.7 years), mean serum PSA level (9.3 ng/mL), mean prostate weight (43 g), and biopsy strategy (73% sextant) were matched with the cohort of 35 white men (median age, 57.1 years; mean PSA, 9.3 ng/mL;, mean prostate weight, 43 g; biopsy strategy, 66% sextant). Despite similar biopsy characteristics between the 2 groups (Gleason score > or =7 in 43% of AA men vs. 37% of white men), AA men exhibited significantly higher prostatectomy Gleason scores (> or =7 in 76% of AA men vs. 34% of white men; P = .01). AA men also had a higher mean tumor volume (1.82 cm3 vs. 0.72 cm3; P = .001) and had 2.8 times more tumor per ng/mL of serum PSA (0.22 cm3 per ng/mL vs. 0.079 cm3 per ng/mL; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a cohort of white men with similar clinical features at the time of biopsy, AA men with nonpalpable PC had higher prostatectomy Gleason scores, greater cancer volume, and greater tumor volume per ng/mL of serum PSA. These data provide additional support for the concept of early PC detection using a serum PSA threshold of 2.5 ng/mL for biopsy among AA men.     

Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To present nomograms providing estimates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for men diagnosed during the PSA era with clinically localized disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment PSA level, 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score in predicting the time to posttherapy PSA failure in 1,654 men with T1c,2 prostate cancer managed with either RP or RT. RESULTS: Pretherapy PSA, AJCC clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score were independent predictors (P < .0001) of time to posttherapy PSA failure in patients managed with either RP or RT. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in the format of a nomogram stratified by the pretreatment PSA, AJCC clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and local treatment modality. CONCLUSION: Men at high risk (> 50%) for early (< or = 2 years) PSA failure could be identified on the basis of the type of local therapy received and the clinical information obtained as part of the routine work-up for localized prostate cancer. Selection of these men for trials evaluating adjuvant systemic and improved local therapies may be justified.     

Prospective study of cancer detection in black and white men with normal digital rectal examination but prostate specific antigen equal or greater than 4.0 ng/mL

BACKGROUND: The serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration with no clinical evidence of prostate carcinoma is higher and more variable in black than in white American men. The influence of this phenomenon on relations between race, PSA, and cancer detection in men with a PSA greater than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL has not been investigated. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2000, 451 black and 480 white men with a normal digital rectal examination and a PSA greater than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL had an initial prostate biopsy at one medical center. The histology of the biopsy specimens and the Gleason score of malignant specimens was determined by one uropathologist. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 207 (46%) black and 167 (35%) white men (P = 0.0006). When adjusted for PSA, cancer detection was also greater in the black than the white men, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (relative risk, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.71; P = 0.06). Gleason score 7-10 cancer was detected in 88 (20%) black and 45 (9%) white men (P = 0.0001), and the difference remained significant when adjusted for PSA (relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.16-2.61; P = 0.0008). In the intermediate PSA range of 4.0-9.9 ng/mL, cancer detection and Gleason score 7-10 cancer detection was greater in black than in white men younger than 60, 60-69, and 70 years of age or older, but the difference was significant only for Gleason score 7-10 cancer detection among men 60-69 years of age (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: There is a direct correlation between Gleason score and cause specific survival with local stage prostate carcinoma. The authors' study indicates that prostate carcinomas with established malignant potential are more likely to be identified in black than in white men with PSA elevation as the only indication of malignancy and raises the possibility that a PSA threshold less than 4.0 ng/mL in black men younger than 70 years of age may reduce racial disparities in prostate carcinoma morbidity and mortality.     

Ten-Year Survival After Radical Prostatectomy: Specimen Gleason Score Is the Predictor in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

Preoperative serum caveolin-1 as a prognostic marker for recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort.

PURPOSE: Up-regulation of caveolin-1 (cav-1) is associated with virulent prostate cancer, and serum cav-1 levels are elevated in prostate cancer patients but not in benign prostatic hyperplasia. In this study, we evaluated the potential of high preoperative serum cav-1 levels to predict biochemical progression of prostate cancer. The value of the combined preoperative markers, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and serum cav-1 for predicting biochemical recurrence was also investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum samples taken from 419 prostate cancer patients before radical prostatectomy were selected from our Specialized Programs of Research Excellence prostate cancer serum and tissue bank. Serum samples were obtained 0 to 180 days before surgery and all patients had complete data on age, sex, race, stage at enrollment, and follow-up for biochemical recurrence. Serum cav-1 levels were measured according to our previously reported ELISA protocol. RESULTS: Cav-1 levels were measured in the sera of 419 prostate cancer patients; the mean serum level was 4.52 ng/mL (median 1.01 ng/mL). Patients with high serum cav-1 levels had a 2.7-fold (P = 0.0493) greater risk of developing biochemical recurrence compared with those with low serum cav-1 levels. Importantly, patients with serum PSA >/= 10 ng/mL and elevated levels of serum cav-1 had 2.44 times higher risk (P = 0.0256) of developing biochemical recurrence compared with patients with low levels of cav-1. In addition, high serum cav-1 levels combined with increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted much shorter recurrence-free survival in the group of patients with PSA >/= 10 ng/mL (P = 0.0353). Cav-1 was also able to distinguish between high- and low- risk patients with biopsy Gleason score of seven, after adjusting, for patients PSA levels (P = 0.0429). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, elevated preoperative levels of serum cav-1 predict decreased time to cancer recurrence. In the subset of patients with serum PSA of >/=10 ng/mL, the combination of serum cav-1 and biopsy Gleason score has the capacity to predict time to biochemical recurrence.