Do Antithymocyte Globulin-Free Acute Rejection Therapies Increase the Risk of Polyoma Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients?

IntroductionBK virus nephropathy is a serious complication that can lead to allograft kidney loss. Excessive immunosuppression increases the risk. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an increased risk of BK viremia and nephropathy in patients who underwent high-dose immunosuppression because of the development of acute rejection in the early period after kidney transplantation.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed between April 2015 and March 2016. Twenty-nine patients who had biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 3 months were evaluated for BK viremia and nephropathy. Thirty patients who had transplantations at the same period were the control group. Plasma BK-DNA values were examined at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the rejection treatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months in the control group. Presence of polyoma nephropathy was examined with surveillance biopsies at the 6 and 12 months.ResultsAcute rejection treatment was started on the 12th day after transplantation (2–37 days). Seventeen cellular rejections and 12 humoral rejections were reported by biopsy. Two of the 12 humoral rejections were suspicious. Only pulse steroid (PS) (n = 18); PS, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 8); PS and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 2); and PS and plasmapheresis (n = 1) treatments were performed. In 21 patients in the rejection group and 25 patients in the control group, BK-DNA was not positive at all. Two patients had graft loss at 11 and 36 months in the rejection group. Graft losses were secondary to rejection.ConclusionsTreatment with antithymocyte globulin-free regimens after acute rejection episodes did not lead to an increase in BK viremia.     

Immunosuppression following intestinal transplantation

Acute rejection is still the main risk factor following intestinal transplantation. Potent immunosuppression decreases rejection frequency, but may increase immunosuppression-related complications. Isolated small intestinal transplantation was performed in 14 adult patients with short bowel syndromes. Immunosuppression included tacrolimus and rapamycin in combination with steroids for 6 months after ATG or daclizumab induction therapy. In addition to protocol biopsies, cellular immune status and soluble immune parameters were used to guide immunosuppression. CMV and EBV markers were determined on a routine basis. Ten of 14 patients (71%) survived for 1 to 38 months (median 26 months). Eight patients are at home, in good physical condition, completely on enteral nutrition. Among the 5 patients (36%) who developed acute rejection, 2 patients with early postoperative events underwent graft removal and 1 patient died due to multiple organ failure. Two patients developed severe acute rejection episodes at 10 and 24 months following transplantation. Both patients recovered following OKT3 rescue therapy and increased baseline immunosuppression with repeated methylprednisolone and infliximab treatment. Infections included peritonitis (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 3), central line infection (n = 5), urinary tract (n = 2), CMV (n = 2), and EBV (n = 4). Two patients developed anastomotic leaks at the esophageal and coloanal anastomosis. In conclusion, acute rejection episodes can be controlled by potent immunosuppression using tacrolimus in combination with rapamycin. Immunosuppression-associated complications, including infections, were in an acceptable range. However, even late after transplantation, reduction in immunosuppression may lead to severe rejection without major clinical symptoms.     

Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients

INTRODUCTION: A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) in a triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus. METHODS: In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n = 40) or CsA (n = 38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured. RESULTS: At 12 months, graft survival (92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P = 0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often. DISCUSSION: Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.     

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus. METHODS: Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus. RESULTS: Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.     

Double-blind comparison of two corticosteroid regimens plus mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients experience adverse events attributed to corticosteroid therapy. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-month, controlled steroid dose-reduction study in renal transplant recipients with an unblinded 6-month follow-up. In the low/stop arm, corticoste. roids were given at half the dosage of control for 3 months from the date of transplantation, and then withdrawn. Both arms received mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months posttransplantation. RESULTS: There were 248 patients in the control group and 252 in the low/stop group. At 6 months the low/stop group had more biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes than the control (23% vs. 14%; P=0.008). At 12 months this increased to 25% vs. 15%. Most rejections were Banff grade I. Twelve-month graft loss was 5% in the low/stop group vs. 4% in the control. At 6 and 12 months serum cholesterol (P<0.01, P<0.01), triglycer. ides (P<0.01, P<0.01), and systolic blood pressure (P<0.001, P<0.001) were lower in the low/stop group. Diastolic pressure was lower (P<0.01) and lumbar spine bone density was greater (P<0.01) in the low/ stop group at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine, reduction and early withdrawal of the prophylactic corticosteroid dose is feasible without an unacceptable increase in serious rejection episodes. This is accompanied by a significant reduction of steroid-related adverse events.     

The safety and efficacy of early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients 6 months' posttransplant

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in clinical transplantation has resulted in dramatic reduction in acute rejection rate and improvements in short-term allograft survival. However, CNI-induced chronic nephrotoxicity is a clinical concern since it is a major cause of chronic allograft failure. Recent studies suggest that withdrawal or reduction of CNI dosage results in improvement in graft function and survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of substituting CNIs with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 6 months' postkidney transplant. METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients of first or second grafts (n = 20) maintained on CNI-based therapy and with no history of irreversible acute or vascular rejection were included in the study. Primary end points were the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection or treatment failure. Secondary end points included changes in mean serum creatinine and estimated GFR (Cockroft and Gault, CG) over time, incidence of infection, cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol), graft and patient survival rates, as well as incidence of biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Study patients were compared to a matched control group (n = 20) who remained on CNI-based therapy at equivalent time points. RESULTS: Incidence of acute rejection following CNI withdrawal was 15%. All episodes reversed with steroid pulses. There was no significant difference in mean serum creatinine or estimated GFR during the follow-up period. No significant change occurred in blood pressure or antihypertensive agents between the groups; however, there was a trend toward lower cholesterol levels after CNI withdrawal. No graft or patient loss was seen during the study period. Biopsy-proven CAN was diagnosed in 2 control patients (10%) at 6 to 8 months' posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of CNI at 6 months following kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of rejection and a trend toward lower serum creatinine and cholesterol levels. Further follow-up is needed to establish the long-term results of CNI-sparing regimens on the development of CAN.     

Improved clinical outcomes for liver transplant recipients using cyclosporine monitoring based on 2-hr post-dose levels (C2)

BACKGROUND: A prospective, open-label, study was conducted at 29 centers in 9 countries, involving 307 de novo liver transplant patients to compare the clinical usefulness of monitoring 2-hr post-dose cyclosporine (CsA) levels (C2) with conventional trough cyclosporine blood levels (pre-dose) (C0). METHODS: Neoral oral therapy was initiated at 15 mg/kg/day and dose adjusted according to predetermined C2 or C0 target level ranges. The primary efficacy variable was treatment failure at 3 months, where evaluation was based on a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven rejection, treatment for rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal/discontinuation from the study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Graft loss at 12 weeks (retransplantation or death) occurred in 6.8% C2 and in 7.0% C0 patients. Overall incidence of treated acute rejection was lower for C2 (23.6%) than C0 patients (31.6%) (P=0.144, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test). In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients, the incidence of rejection in the C2 group was significantly less than in the C0 group (21.2% vs. 33.0%; P<0.05), whereas in HCV-positive patients, the rejection rate was similar in both groups (26.7% for C2 group vs. 27.3% for C0 group: P=0.81). C2 patients (n=16) who reached minimum target CsA levels by day 3 had a notably low incidence of rejection (12.5%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of rejection in C0 patients, irrespective of time to reach target level. For biopsy-proven acute rejections (21.6% for C2 vs. 30.4% for C0), the incidence of moderate and severe histological diagnosis was significantly lower in the C2 group than in the C0 group (47% vs. 73%; P=0.01). Safety profiles were similar between the two groups, with few patient withdrawals due to adverse events (9.5% for C2; 7.0% for C0). CONCLUSIONS: Using C2 monitoring, the overall incidence of acute cellular rejection was lower compared with the C0 group, and the histological severity of acute rejections was shown to be significantly milder for the C2 group, indicative of good long-term prognosis. These data demonstrate that the use of C2 monitoring is superior to C0 and results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection without detrimental effect on the drug safety profile.     

Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: The adoption of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as the mainstay of immunosuppression has resuited in a significant decrease of acute rejection and improvement of short-term graft survival. However, because of the irreversible nephrotoxicity associated with the chronic use of the CNI, the magnitude of the improvement of long-term graft survival has been more modest. Therefore, an effective immunosuppression regimen that does not rely on CNI may result in improvement of long-term outcome and simplification of the management of transplant recipients. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients of primary cadaver or living donor kidneys at low immunologic risk were enrolled in a CNI avoidance study. The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha), administered for a total of five doses at biweekly intervals; 3 gm/day mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 month and 2 gm thereafter; and conventional corticosteroid therapy. Patients who underwent rejection episodes could be started on CNI. The primary efficacy end-point was biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months posttransplant. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven rejection was diagnosed in 48% of patients during the first 6 months after transplantation. The majority of rejection episodes were Banff grade I and IIA and were fully reversed with corticosteroid therapy. The median time to the first biopsy-proven rejection among patients who experienced this event during the first 6 months was 39 days. In 22 patients with delayed graft function, the proportion of patients with biopsy-proven rejection was 50% at 6 months. However in the first 2 weeks posttransplant, only 1 of 22 patients with delayed graft function developed biopsy-proven rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 96%. Only two grafts were lost secondary to rejection. At 1-year posttransplant, 62% of patients had received CNI for more than 7 days. At 1-year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine in the nonrejectors with no CNI use was 113 micromol/L (95%, confidence interval [CI], 100.7 to 125.3 micromol/L) and in the rejectors or patients with CNI use (more than 7 days) was 154 micromol/L (95% CI, 135.0 to 173.0 micromol/L). In selected patients with rejection, analysis of circulating and intragraft lymphocytes revealed complete IL-2Ralpha saturation. CONCLUSIONS: This CNI avoidance study in immunologic low-risk patients, while only partially successful in preventing acute rejection, provided benefits to a sizable minority of patients who have not required chronic CNI therapy. However, wide acceptance of a CNI-sparing immunosuppression regimen may require a lower rate of acute rejection, possibly through the addition of a non-nephrotoxic dose of CNI. However, because complete IL-2Ralpha blockade was present during rejection, it can be assumed that alternative pathways, such as IL-15, may be responsible for the rejection; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide a more strategic approach.     

Outcome after intestinal transplantation: results from one center's 9-year experience; discussion 1031-2

HYPOTHESIS: Outcomes after intestinal transplantation have improved during the past decade with refinements in surgical techniques as well as advances in immunosuppression and antimicrobial therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center, August 1991 through December 2000. PATIENTS: Adult (5) and pediatric (12) patients with intestinal failure. All developed complications from long-term total parenteral nutrition therapy. Median age was 8.6 years and median weight was 22 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Primary intestinal transplantation with (n = 14) or without (n = 3) the liver. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and graft survival, viral infections, rejection, and nutritional autonomy. RESULTS: Twenty-one intestinal grafts were transplanted into the 17 recipients. All donors were cadaveric and were matched by ABO blood group and size. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was 63% and 55%, respectively. Death-censored graft survival at 1 and 3 years was 73% and 55%, respectively. There were 1.5 acute cellular rejection episodes per graft and 3 grafts were lost to rejection. Incidences of infection with the Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus were negligible with aggressive prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Nutritional autonomy was achieved in 69% of grafts surviving more than 30 days after intestinal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal transplantation is now the standard of therapy for patients with intestinal failure and complications resulting from total parenteral nutrition. Outcomes have markedly improved since initiation of the program. Aggressive immunosuppression as well as prophylaxis and preemptive antiviral therapy have led to low incidences of acute cellular rejection, Epstein-Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus. Finally, nutritional autonomy can be achieved after successful intestinal transplantation.     

Sirolimus conversion after liver transplantation: improvement in measured glomerular filtration rate after 2 years

METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of 2005 liver transplantations. Therapy was either started de novo or converted from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to sirolimus as the main immunosuppressive agent for nephrotoxicity or rejection. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined with iodine 125-labeled sodium isthalamate (Glofil-125), and serum creatinine concentration was obtained before and 3 months after transplantation, and yearly in both groups. Sirolimus levels were 10 to 15 ng/mL in patients at less than 3 months after transplantations and 5 to 10 ng/mL in the remaining patients. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Data for 29 patients in the de novo group and 35 in the conversion group were reviewed. Patients in the de novo group demonstrated an acute cellular rejection rate of 17.2%, 40% of which were steroid resistant. In this group, 48.2% discontinuation of sirolimus was necessary because of adverse effects. Patients in the conversion group demonstrated an acute cellular rejection rate of 2.8% and a 34.3% rate of sirolimus discontinuation. Seventeen (56.7%) patients at 1 year and 8 (44.4%) patients at 2 years demonstrated continued improvement in GFR. In the conversion group, case-control analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in GFR and serum creatinine concentration (P > .05) at 1 and 2 years after conversion. At the time of review, no patients in the conversion group required hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to sirolimus therapy is an effective strategy in improving renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and can be done without increased rejection. Most of our patients (65.7%) tolerated sirolimus conversion. Of these, 56.7% and 44.4% demonstrated continued increase in GFR with the CNI-free regimen at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Long-term, large-population, prospective, randomized, controlled studies should further validate these results.     

Sirolimus-based therapy with or without cyclosporine: long-term follow-up in renal transplant patients

This open-label, phase 3b, extension trial in renal transplant recipients (Sirolimus Study 311) assessed the long-term safety of sirolimus (SRL) administered with cyclosporine (CsA) (SRL + CsA group, n = 98) or without CsA (SRL group, n = 69). Renal transplant recipients who had either completed one of seven previous SRL studies sponsored by Wyeth Research or had participated for > or =3 months and reached a protocol-designated endpoint were eligible for enrollment. Data were available for 167 patients, all of whom initially received steroids. Mean total SRL exposure was 1526 days, including previous study participation. After enrollment in the extension study, there were significantly more acute rejections in the SRL + CsA group (6.1% vs 0%, P < .05). Differences in rates of graft loss (3.1% vs 1.4%) and death (6.1% vs 1.4%) were not significantly different between SRL + CsA and SRL groups, respectively. At 48 months after transplantation, calculated GFR (53.4 vs 70.9 mL/min) and hemoglobin (124.9 vs 136.6 g/L) were significantly better in the SRL group. Lipid values were not significantly different between groups at 48 months. The incidence of treatment-emergent increased creatinine, anemia, hypertension, headache, epistaxis, abnormal kidney function, and upper respiratory infection were significantly higher in the SRL + CsA group, whereas no adverse events were significantly higher in the SRL group. Malignancies were reported more frequently (11.2% vs 0%) with SRL + CsA. Results from this extension study indicate that SRL-based therapy without CsA is a safe alternative to combination therapy with CsA, offering long-term improvement in renal function with no increased risk of late acute rejection.     

100 multivisceral transplants at a single center

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to summarize the evolution of multivisceral transplantation over a decade of experience and evaluate its current status. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Multivisceral transplantation can be valuable for the treatment of patients with massive abdominal catastrophes. Its major limitations have been technical and rejection of the intestinal graft. METHODS: This study consisted of an outcome analysis of 98 consecutive patients who received multivisceral transplantation at our institution. This represents the largest single center experience to date. RESULTS: The most common diseases in our population before transplant were intestinal gastroschisis and intestinal dysmotility syndromes in children, and mesenteric thrombosis and trauma in adults. Kaplan Meier estimated patient and graft survivals for all cases were 65% and 63% at 1 year, 49% and 47% at 3 years, and 49% and 47% at 5 years. Factors that adversely influenced patient survival included transplant before 1998 (P = 0.01), being hospitalized at the time of transplant (P = 0.05), and being a child who received Campath-1H induction (P = 0.03). Among 37 patients who had none of these 3 factors (15 adults and 22 children), estimated 1- and 3-year survivals were 89% and 71%, respectively. Patients transplanted since 2001 had significantly less moderate and severe rejections (31.6% vs 67.6%, P = 0.0005) with almost half of these patients never developing rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral transplantation is now an effective treatment of patients with complex abdominal pathology. The incidences of serious acute rejection and patient survival have improved in the most recent experience. Our results show that the multivisceral graft seems to facilitate engraftment of transplanted organs and raises the possibility that there is a degree of immunologic protection afforded by this procedure.     

Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial of Steroid Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Basiliximab, Cyclosporine Microemulsion and Mycophenolate Mofetil

Corticosteroids withdrawal from immunosuppressive regimens has thus far been associated with increased risk of acute rejection episodes. In this study, basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early corticosteroid withdrawal in de novo renal allograft recipients. Primary renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine-microemulsion, and mycophenolate mofetil, were randomized to either corticosteroid withdrawal at day four post-transplantation (n = 40) or standard steroid therapy (n = 43). The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. Randomized subjects who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of basiliximab were analyzed in an intent-to-treat fashion. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was not significantly different between the steroid withdrawal group (20%) and the standard treatment group (16%). Patient and graft survival was 100% in the steroid withdrawal group while one death in a patient with a functioning graft occurred in the standard steroid group. Seventy-two percent of the steroid withdrawal group remained off steroids at 6 months post-transplant. Allograft function and incidence of adverse events and infections were similar between the two groups. Rapid and early corticosteroid withdrawal among renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction and daily therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection.     

Effects of immediate switch from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus at first acute rejection in renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: A number of institutions have reported favorable results in renal transplant patients after conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to tacrolimus at the time of acute rejection, but no prospective, controlled study has been performed to date. Here, we report the first randomized study comparing patients whose therapy was changed at a first episode of acute rejection to tacrolimus with those who were maintained on CsA microemulsion (ME). METHODS: This 3-month, prospective, open, multicenter, parallel-group study was conducted at 15 centers in seven European countries. In total, 119 renal graft recipients experiencing a first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode while receiving CsA-ME were randomized (1:1) to start tacrolimus-based therapy (n=61) or to continue CsA-ME-based therapy (n=58). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable for both groups. The initial rejection episode responded to steroid treatment in 93.4% (tacrolimus) and 63.8% (CsA-ME) (P=0.001), respectively. In patients at risk, the incidence of recurrent rejection events within 3 months was significantly lower with tacrolimus therapy (5/57, 8.8%) compared with CsA-ME therapy (15/44, 34.1%) (P=0.002). Patient and graft survival were similar in both study groups 3 months after randomization. The most frequently reported adverse events were increased serum creatinine (29.5% vs. 22.4%), hypertension (24.6% vs. 22.4%), and urinary tract infection (18.0% vs. 20.7%) for tacrolimus versus CsA-ME. Tremor was more common in tacrolimus treated-patients (17.4% vs. 2.1%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion to tacrolimus therapy benefited the resolution of acute rejection episodes and significantly reduced the risk of recurrent rejection compared with continuation of CsA-ME.     

阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性

目的 评价阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性.方法 将89例肾移植受者随机分为试验组(43例)和对照组(46例).试验组于肾移植术前和术后24 h内分别静脉滴注阿来佐单抗15 mg,对照组不接受免疫诱导治疗.受者术后常规应用环孢素A(或他克莫司)+吗替麦考酚酯+泼尼松预防排斥反应.统计两组术后12月内的移植肾功能、急性排斥反应发生率、感染发生率、移植肾功能延迟恢复发生率、移植肾存活率及淋巴细胞计数,并用ImmuKnowTM免疫细胞功能测定法检测受者CD4+T淋巴细胞的三磷酸腺苷(ATP)值.结果 术后12个月内试验组7.0%(3/43)的受者发生病理证实的急性排斥反应,明显低于对照组的23.9%(11/46,P＜0.05).试验组和对照组总体的感染发生率为别为39.5%(17/43)和30.4%(14/46,P＞0.05),两组机会性感染的发生率分另为23.2%(10/43)和17.4%(8/46,P＞0.05).术后3个月内,试验组淋巴细胞计数低于对照组;术后6个月内,试验组CD4+T淋巴细胞ATP值低于对照组.结论 阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗可维持受者的免疫抑制状态,未见严重不良反应.     

One year results of preoperative single bolus ATG-Fresenius induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients

Sensitization in kidney transplantation is associated with more acute rejections, inferior graft survival, and an increase in delayed graft function. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative single bolus antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifty-six cadaveric donor kidney transplant recipients were divided into two groups: Group I (nonsensitized group, n = 30) and group II (sensitized group, PRA>10%, n = 26). ATG was given as a single preoperative bolus induction therapy to group II (ATG IV; 9 mg/kg). The group I patients were treated with mycophenolate mofetil preoperatively as induction therapy. The basic immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus (FK-506) or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. After hospital discharge, patients were followed on a routine outpatient basis for 12 months. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) occurred in 20% (6/30) of group I and 15.38% (4/26) of group II patients (P = NS). Infections occurred in eight patients (26.7%) as 11 episodes (36.7%), averaging 1.4 episodes per infected patient in group 1, and 6 patients (23.1%) for a total of 10 episodes (38.5%), averaging 1.7 episodes per infected patient, in group II (P = NS). Occurrence of side effects and hospital stay were almost comparable in the two groups. No delayed graft function was observed in either group. The 12-month actuarial patient and graft survival were 100% in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: A preoperative single bolus ATG induction therapy was an effective and safe therapeutic measure, yielding an acceptable acute rejection rate in presensitized renal transplant recipients.     

A pilot study on the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppression without prednisone after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are commonly used in the immunosuppression therapy after liver transplantation, yet are associated with considerable side effects. Retrospective studies have shown that corticosteroids can be safely withdrawn from months to years after transplant. We prospectively investigated the effects of early immunosuppression without the use of corticosteroids on graft outcome and transplant complications. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to receive immunosuppression composed of cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine with (n=22) or without prednisone (n=23), in conventional doses. In those patients who received prednisone, this was withdrawn within 3 months after transplant. The median follow-up of survivors was 14 months (range: 6-24). The study end points were to determine graft survival and function, infectious complications, including hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels in HCV-infected recipients, acute rejection, kidney function, and metabolic complications. RESULTS: Eleven deaths occurred, 6 of which were in the prednisone group. Two-year survival did not differ between patients treated with or without prednisone (70.2% vs. 78.3%, P=0.83), nor did the causes of death. No differences were observed with regard to graft function, renal function, and infectious complications. In the subset of patients who received transplants for HCV-related cirrhosis, the dynamics of virus replication HCV-RNA was faster among those treated with prednisone. The incidence and severity of acute rejection was similar in the two groups. More than 80% of acute rejections in both groups were classified as mild or moderate and underwent spontaneous resolution. Only two patients in each group had severe acute rejection requiring additional treatment with high-dose steroids. Patients receiving prednisone tended to have greater biochemical signs of cholestasis, higher serum cholesterol and glucose levels, and more frequent insulin requirement than those treated without corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation can be performed safely without using corticosteroids in the early postoperative course, and there is no need for routine aggressive steroid treatment of established acute rejections.     

Selective use of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant patients in Indian scenario

PURPOSE: Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable immunosuppressive in renal transplantation, its high cost demands that it be used selectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospectively study included 55 renal transplant patients on MMF for rescue therapy after treatment of acute vascular rejection (n = 45), acute/chronic liver disease with elevated transaminases (n = 4), early chronic rejection (n = 2), cyclosporine toxicity (n = 3), and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n = 1). The patients were given 1.5 to 2 g MMF in divided doses for at least 6 months, depending upon the tolerability, adverse effects, and finances, and followed for 1 year. The patients on MMF following treatment of acute rejections were compared with controls who received azathioprine-based triple immunosuppression after treatment of an acute rejection episode. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent acute rejection in the first year was 18% in the MMF group compared to 42% in the control group (P < .005). The serum transaminases in the acute/chronic liver disease group reached normal levels at 3 to 6 months. The serum creatinine remained stable for a mean duration of 8 months in the early chronic rejection patients. The patients with cyclosporine toxicity showed stable graft function on low-dose cyclosporine. The patient with hemolytic-uremic syndrome showed stable graft function for 4 years. The MMF-based triple regimen is two times more expensive than an azathioprine-based regimen. CONCLUSION: MMF significantly decreases the recurrence of acute rejection. It is a good alternative agent in special situations like acute/chronic liver diseases with elevated transaminases, early chronic rejection, cyclosporine toxicity, and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Because of the high cost it should be used selectively in our population.     

Comparison of outcomes after delayed graft function: sirolimus-based versus other calcineurin-inhibitor sparing induction immunosuppression regimens

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) may increase the incidence of or prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation. This study compares transplant outcomes of SRL-based induction immunosuppression (IS) with other calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) sparing regimens in the DGF setting. METHODS: Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received transplants between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 2001 and experienced DGF (n=132) were divided into three groups by induction IS: A, depleting antibody (n=41); B, SRL (n=49); and C, neither (n=42). All recipients also received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil with delayed initiation of CNIs when good renal function returned. Patient survival, graft survival, and time to rejection within 1 year of transplantation were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. One-year graft function was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The SRL group had longer DGF duration (P=0.01). The three groups had comparable patient (P=0.27) and graft survival (P=0.69), but the depleting antibody group experienced less rejection (P=0.004). There were no clinically significant differences in 1-year graft function. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immunosuppression with a depleting antibody preparation reduced rejection, whereas SRL prolonged DGF duration. All three CNI-sparing induction IS regimens resulted in comparable patient survival, graft survival, and graft function.     

Conversion to sirolimus in a population of kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) are associated with nephrotoxicity that might reduce long-term graft survival. We report our experience with sirolimus (SRL) conversion among a population of kidney and kidney pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: Thirty transplant recipients (6 women, 24 men; age 41 +/- 10.5 years old) were converted to SRL therapy at 25.97 +/- 32.5 months after transplantation. Indications for conversion were: intolerance to mycophenolate mofetil (n = 13), diabetes mellitus (n = 3), CI nephrotoxicity (n = 11), CI nephrotoxicity with chronic allograft rejection (n = 2), and side effects of azathioprine (n = 1). Follow-up after conversion is 3 to 45 months. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in the 3 months postconversion in renal function, hematological profile, and mean arterial blood pressure. In contrast there was a significant increase in cholesterol values (pre: 198.7 +/- 49.4, versus post 221.2 +/- 60.8, P = .018). At a follow-up of 15.2 +/- 9.9 months after conversion two patients (6.7%) died with functioning allograft (one because of infection and one to myocardial infarct) three kidney allografts (10.7%) have been lost: two chronic rejection; one infection. In two patients SRL therapy was discontinued (one infection, one refractory edema). Neither significant change in renal function nor episodes of acute rejection were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to SRL was safe. There was no deterioration in renal function nor episodes of acute rejection. There was a significant increase in cholesterol values after conversion. The size of the sample and the time of follow-up may have determined our results.