Twitch pressures in the assessment of diaphragm weakness.

To assess the value of phrenic nerve stimulation in the investigation of diaphragm function, transdiaphragmatic pressures were measured in 20 healthy subjects and in 15 patients with diaphragm weakness, during unilateral and bilateral transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation at 1 Hz at functional residual capacity (twitch Pdi). Diaphragm function was initially assessed by measuring transdiaphragmatic pressure during a voluntary manoeuvre, the maximal sniff (sniff Pdi); normal readings were confirmed in the control subjects (102-157 (normal greater than 98) cm H2O in the 10 men, 79-102 (normal greater than 70) cm H2O in the 10 women) and reduced values were found in the 15 patients with diaphragm weakness (7.5-90 cm H2O in the 13 men, 23 and 53 cm H2O in the two women). Twitch Pdi during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation ranged from 8.8 to 33 cm H2O in the control subjects and from 3.1 to 27 cm H2O in the 10 patients in whom a measurement could be obtained. Bilateral twitch Pdi correlated with sniff Pdi both in the control subjects and in the patients with diaphragm weakness (r = 0.75). Only four patients had a bilateral twitch Pdi below the lowest value seen in the control group, including the three with the lowest sniff Pdi (3.1-8.5 cm H2O). These results indicate that transdiaphragmatic pressure recorded during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation discriminated between control subjects and patients with known weakness of the diaphragm only when this was severe.     

The value of multiple tests of respiratory muscle strength

BACKGROUND: Respiratory muscle weakness is an important clinical problem. Tests of varying complexity and invasiveness are available to assess respiratory muscle strength. The relative precision of different tests in the detection of weakness is less clear, as is the value of multiple tests. METHODS: The respiratory muscle function tests of clinical referrals who had multiple tests assessed in our laboratories over a 6-year period were analysed. Thresholds for weakness for each test were determined from published and in-house laboratory data. The patients were divided into three groups: those who had all relevant measurements of global inspiratory muscle strength (group A, n = 182), those with full assessment of diaphragm strength (group B, n = 264) and those for whom expiratory muscle strength was fully evaluated (group C, n = 60). The diagnostic outcome of each inspiratory, diaphragm and expiratory muscle test, both singly and in combination, was studied and the impact of using more than one test to detect weakness was calculated. RESULTS: The clinical referrals were primarily for the evaluation of neuromuscular diseases and dyspnoea of unknown cause. A low maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (Pimax) was recorded in 40.1% of referrals in group A, while a low sniff nasal pressure (Sniff Pnasal) was recorded in 41.8% and a low sniff oesophageal pressure (Sniff Poes) in 37.9%. When assessing inspiratory strength with the combination of all three tests, 29.6% of patients had weakness. Using the two non-invasive tests (Pimax and Sniff Pnasal) in combination, a similar result was obtained (low in 32.4%). Combining Sniff Pdi (low in 68.2%) and Twitch Pdi (low in 67.4%) reduced the diagnoses of patients with diaphragm weakness to 55.3% in group B. 38.3% of the patients in group C had expiratory muscle weakness as measured by maximum expiratory pressure (Pemax) compared with 36.7% when weakness was diagnosed by cough gastric pressure (Pgas), and 28.3% when assessed by Twitch T10. Combining all three expiratory muscle tests reduced the number of patients diagnosed as having expiratory muscle weakness to 16.7%. CONCLUSION: The use of single tests such as Pimax, Pemax and other available individual tests of inspiratory, diaphragm and expiratory muscle strength tends to overdiagnose weakness. Combinations of tests increase diagnostic precision and, in the population studied, they reduced the diagnosis of inspiratory, specific diaphragm and expiratory muscle weakness by 19-56%. Measuring both Pimax and Sniff Pnasal resulted in a relative reduction of 19.2% of patients falsely diagnosed with inspiratory muscle weakness. The addition of Twitch Pdi to Sniff Pdi increased diagnostic precision by a smaller amount (18.9%). Having multiple tests of respiratory muscle function available both increases diagnostic precision and makes assessment possible in a range of clinical circumstances.     

Diaphragm strength in patients with recent hemidiaphragm paralysis.

Eleven patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis of recent onset were studied to investigate the effect of the paralysis on inspiratory muscle function. Nine of the patients had noticed a decrease in exercise tolerance, which was not explained by any other pathological condition. Hemidiaphragm dysfunction was confirmed by the demonstration of a greatly reduced or absent transdiaphragmatic pressure on stimulation of the phrenic nerve in the neck, by means of surface bipolar electrodes (unilateral twitch Pdi), compared with normal values on the contralateral side. Transdiaphragmatic pressure was 44.6% (9.4%) predicted during a maximal sniff and 30.3% (16.8%) predicted during a maximal static inspiration against a closed airway, confirming diaphragm weakness. Maximum static inspiratory mouth pressures were also low (61.7% (12.7%) predicted), consistent with a reduction in inspiratory muscle capacity. Phrenic nerve conduction time was prolonged on the affected side in nine patients, consistent with phrenic nerve dysfunction, whereas on the unaffected side it was normal. It is concluded that recent hemidiaphragm paralysis causes a reduction in transdiaphragmatic pressure that is associated with a reduction in maximum inspiratory mouth pressure. Phrenic nerve stimulation is a useful technique with which to confirm and quantify hemidiaphragm dysfunction. Measurement of phrenic nerve conduction time provides useful information about the underlying pathology.     

Can diaphragmatic contractility be assessed by airway twitch pressure in mechanically ventilated patients?

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients inspiratory muscle function may be assessed by measurements of maximal inspiratory airway pressure and the response of twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi tw) to bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation. The first is limited by its total dependence on patient cooperation. Although the second approach is independent of patient volition, it is impractical because it requires oesophageal and gastric balloons. Because airway pressure is easily and non-invasively recorded in patients with artificial airways, we hypothesised that twitch airway pressure (Paw tw) reliably predicts Pdi tw and twitch oesophageal pressure (Poes tw) in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Thirteen mechanically ventilated patients recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure received phrenic nerve stimulation at end exhalation. The rapid occlusion technique was used to record respiratory system mechanics. RESULTS: Stimulations were well tolerated. Mean (SE) Paw tw at end exhalation was -8.2 (1.2) cm H(2)O and Poes tw and Pdi tw were -7.3 (1.1) and 10.4 (1.8) cm H(2)O, respectively. Stimulations produced a good correlation between Paw tw and Pdi tw (p<0.001), although the limits of agreement were wide. The results were similar for Poes tw. No relationship was found between the Paw tw/Poes tw ratio and respiratory system compliance or airway resistance. Paw tw reproducibility was excellent (mean coefficient of variation 6%, range 3-9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a good correlation between Paw tw and Poes tw, Paw tw did not reliably predict Poes tw or Pdi tw in mechanically ventilated patients. Nevertheless, the excellent reproducibility of Paw tw suggests that it may be a useful means of monitoring inspiratory muscle contractility in the routine care of mechanically ventilated patients.     

Unilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve.

BACKGROUND--Electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve is a useful non-volitional method of assessing diaphragm contractility. During the assessment of hemidiaphragm contractility with electrical stimulation, low twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures may result from difficulty in locating and stimulating the phrenic nerve. Cervical magnetic stimulation overcomes some of these problems, but this technique may not be absolutely specific and does not allow the contractility of one hemidiaphragm to be assessed. This study assesses both the best means of producing supramaximal unilateral magnetic phrenic stimulation and its reproducibility. This technique is then applied to patients. METHODS--The ability of four different magnetic coils to produce unilateral phrenic stimulation in five normal subjects was assessed from twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (TwPDI) measurements and diaphragmatic electromyogram (EMG) recordings. The results from magnetic stimulation were compared with those from electrical stimulation. To determine whether the magnetic field affects the contralateral phrenic nerve as well as the intended phrenic nerve, EMG recordings from each hemidiaphragm were compared during stimulation on the same side and the opposite side relative to the recording electrodes. The EMG recordings were made from skin surface electrodes in five normal subjects and from needle electrodes placed in the diaphragm during cardiac surgery in six patients. Similarly, the direction of hemidiaphragm movement was evaluated by ultrasonography. To determine the usefulness of the technique in patients the 43 mm mean diameter double coil was used in 54 patients referred for assessment of possible respiratory muscle weakness. These results were compared with unilateral electrical phrenic stimulation, maximum sniff PDI, and TwPDI during cervical magnetic stimulation. RESULTS--In the five normal subjects supramaximal stimulation was established for eight out of 10 phrenic nerves with the 43 mm double coil. Supramaximal unilateral magnetic stimulation produced a higher TwPDI than electrical stimulation (mean (SD) 13.4 (2.5) cm H2O with 35 mm coil; 14.1 (3.8) cm H2O with 43 mm coil; 10.0 (1.7) cm H2O with electrical stimulation). Spread of the magnetic field to the opposite phrenic nerve produced a small amplitude contralateral diaphragm EMG measured from skin surface electrodes which reached a mean of 15% of the maximum EMG amplitude produced by ipsilateral stimulation. Similarly, in six patients with EMG activity recorded directly from needle electrodes, the contralateral spread of the magnetic field produced EMG activity up to a mean of 3% and a maximum of 6% of that seen with ipsilateral stimulation. Unilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve was rapidly achieved and well tolerated. In the 54 patients unilateral magnetic TwPDI was more closely related than unilateral electrical TwPDI to transdiaphragmatic pressure produced during maximum sniffs and cervical magnetic stimulation. Unilateral magnetic stimulation eliminated the problem of producing a falsely low TwPDI because of technical difficulties in locating and adequately stimulating the nerve. Eight patients with unilateral phrenic nerve paresis, as indicated by a unilaterally elevated hemidiaphragm on a chest radiograph and maximum sniff PDI consistent with hemidiaphragm weakness, were all accurately identified by unilateral magnetic stimulation. CONCLUSIONS--Unilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation is easy to apply and is a reproducible technique in the assessment of hemidiaphragm contractility. It is well tolerated and allows hemidiaphragm contractility to be rapidly and reliably assessed because precise positioning of the coils is not necessary. This may be particularly useful in patients. In addition, the anterolateral positioning of the coil allows the use of the magnet in the supine patient such as in the operating theatre or intensive care unit.     

Diaphragm strength in acute systemic lupus erythematosus in a patient with paradoxical abdominal motion and reduced lung volumes

Diaphragmatic weakness is reported as a common feature of the shrinking lung syndrome of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, in chronic stable SLE it has been shown that, despite poor performance of voluntary tests of diaphragm strength, twitch pressures obtained by stimulating the phrenic nerves are normal. We present a patient with acute SLE and pulmonary involvement who, despite having paradoxical abdominal motion and low maximal inspiratory pressures during voluntary manoeuvres, had normal diaphragm strength when assessed with magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves. Following immunosuppressive therapy symptoms and lung function improved, yet diaphragm contractility remained normal and unchanged. We suggest that this case supports the view that reduced diaphragm muscle contractility per se does not explain the small volume lungs and respiratory symptoms in patients with acute SLE.     

Measurement of twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure: surface versus needle electrode stimulation.

The transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated during bilateral supramaximal phrenic nerve stimulation at 1 Hz from surface stimulating electrodes was compared with pressures obtained from needle electrodes inserted under local anaesthesia. Surface electrodes were used to obtain diaphragmatic electromyograms and magnetometers to monitor rib cage and abdominal configuration. Twitch Pdi was recorded at functional residual capacity in three normal subjects. Mean (SD) twitch Pdi in the three subjects during stimulation with surface electrodes was 19.4 (1.8), 22.5 (1.1), and 29.3 (2.2) cm H2O compared with 12.9 (1.5), 17:4 (1.3), and 22.6 (3.0) cm H2O with needle stimulating electrodes. Thus phrenic nerve stimulation with needle electrodes was more complicated and more invasive than stimulation with surface electrodes and resulted in lower transdiaphragmatic pressures.     

Mouth pressure in response to magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves.

BACKGROUND--Diaphragm strength can be assessed by the measurement of gastric (TW PGA), oesophageal (TW POES), and transdiaphragmatic (TW PDI) pressure in response to phrenic nerve stimulation. However, this requires the passage of two balloon catheters. A less invasive method of assessing diaphragm contractility during stimulation of the phrenic nerves would be of clinical value. A study was undertaken to determine whether pressure measured at the mouth (TW PM) during magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves accurately reflects TW POES, and to investigate the relations between TW PM and TW PDI; and also to see whether glottic closure and twitch potentiation can be avoided during these measurements. METHODS--Eight normal subjects and eight patients with suspected respiratory muscle weakness without lung disease were studied. To prevent glottic closure magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves was performed at functional residual capacity during a gentle expiratory effort against an occluded airway incorporating a small leak. TW PDI, TW POES, and TW PM were recorded. Care was taken to avoid potentiation of the diaphragm. RESULTS--In normal subjects mean TW PM was 13.7 cm H2O (range 11.3-16.1) and TW POES was 13.3 cm H2O (range 10.4-15.9) with a mean (SD) difference of 0.4 (0.81) cm H2O. In patients mean TW PM was 9.1 cm H2O (range 0.5-18.2) and TW POES was 9.3 (range 0.7-18.7) with a mean (SD) difference of -0.2 (0.84) cm H2O. The relation between TW PM and TW PDI was less close but was well described by a linear function. In patients with diaphragm weakness (low sniff PDI) TW PM was < 10 cm H2O. CONCLUSIONS--TW PM reliably reflects TW POES and can be used to predict TW PDI in normal subjects and patients without lung disease. TW PM may therefore be a promising non-invasive, non-volitional technique for the assessment of diaphragm strength.     

Phrenic nerve stimulation in normal subjects and in patients with diaphragmatic weakness.

Phrenic nerve stimulation is often considered to be difficult and unreliable. The time taken for the phrenic nerves to be located and adequately stimulated was measured in 110 subjects, aged 21-89 years, 26 of whom had diaphragmatic weakness; and phrenic nerve conduction time was recorded in 76 of these individuals. Each phrenic nerve was stimulated transcutaneously in the neck with square wave impulses 0.1 ms in duration at 1 Hz and 80-160 volts while diaphragmatic muscle action potentials were recorded with surface electrodes. The time taken to locate either phrenic nerve ranged from two seconds to 22 minutes (median 10s). Both nerves were located in 83 of the 84 control subjects (99%) and in 21 of the 26 patients with diaphragmatic weakness (81%). Mean (SD) phrenic nerve conduction time in the control subjects was 6.94 (0.77) ms on the right and 6.61 (0.77) ms on the left. A weak relationship was found between conduction time and the subjects' age and height. Four out of 24 patients with diaphragmatic weakness had a prolonged phrenic nerve conduction time. Transcutaneous stimulation of the phrenic nerves was not a time consuming procedure, and it was well tolerated, reproducible, and successful in 95% of subjects.     

进胸膈神经全长切断后的肺功能变化观察

目的 研究全长膈神经移位术对肺功能的影响。方法 对15例行全长膈神经移位肌皮神经术的全臂丛根性撕脱伤病人的术后肺功能进行回顾性分析。11例共随访42～48个月，4例在随访过程中失访。结果 所有病例术后无呼吸功能障碍，胸部X线片中均出现不同程度的术侧膈肌麻痹和抬高（高1．0～1．5个肋间）。肺功能参数如肺活量、肺活量占预期值的百分比、残气量、肺总量、功能残余量、第1秒用力呼气量在术后1年均恢复到术前水平，但所有病例的最大吸气压值即使在术后4年仍比预期值有明显降低（平均降低20％）。结论 单侧膈神经完全切断后的肺功能参数均在术后1年内逐渐恢复到术前水平。     

Depression of diaphragm contractility by nitrous oxide in humans.

Nitrous oxide is widely used in anesthesia and critical care medicine. The effect of nitrous oxide on diaphragm contractility in humans is unknown. We evaluated the effect of a 50% nitrous oxide-50% oxygen mixture on diaphragm contractility in healthy adult volunteers. The sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure (Sn Pdi) and the twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Tw Pdi) elicited by bilateral supramaximal phrenic nerve stimulation were measured before during and after inhalation of a mixture of 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen. Sn Pdi decreased by 15.4% during nitrous oxide inhalation, with a value of 136 +/- 21 cm H(2)O before nitrous oxide and a value of 115 +/- 27 cm H(2)O during nitrous oxide inhalation (P = 0.03). Similarly, Tw Pdi decreased from 21.2 +/- 1.8 cm H(2)O before nitrous oxide inhalation to 16.9 +/- 4.1 cm H(2)O during nitrous oxide inhalation (P = 0.03). The effect of nitrous oxide was totally abolished 20 min after its discontinuation. Nitrous oxide has a short-acting suppressant effect on the pressure generating capacity of the diaphragm in healthy humans. IMPLICATIONS: We investigated whether nitrous oxide (a common component of gas anesthesia) reduces diaphragm strength in humans. Diaphragm strength is reduced by nitrous oxide but the effect wears off within 20 min of administration. Caution is advised when using nitrous oxide without anesthesiologist supervision in patients at risk of ventilatory failure     

Ventilatory muscle recruitment and work of breathing in patients with respiratory failure after thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Increased work of breathing (WOB) and respiratory muscle weakness have been identified as major causes of respiratory failure after thoracic surgery. This study was undertaken firstly to characterize the mechanical impairment in patients with respiratory failure after cardio-thoracic surgery, and secondly, to determine how diaphragmatic paralysis affects deterioration in the ventilatory mechanics. METHODS: We evaluated the respiratory mechanics of 24 patients following cardiac and thoracic surgery. Ten patients without respiratory problems were examined as control subjects. There were nine patients with phrenic nerve injury and five patients without phrenic nerve injury who required mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days. Phrenic nerve injury was assessed with a phrenic nerve stimulation test. We measured the respiratory variables, the esophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure swing (deltaPes, deltaPga and deltaPdi, respectively), and the work of breathing during quiet tidal breathing. RESULTS: Both the groups requiring mechanical ventilation exhibited abnormally negative deltaPga/deltaPes values, compared with the control subjects. A significant increase in WOB with the normal generation of deltaPdi was seen in the patients without phrenic nerve injury. In contrast, the poor generation of deltaPdi with a slight increase in work of breathing was noted in patients with phrenic nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated two different types of respiratory failure in thoracic surgery patients, focusing on the impact of phrenic nerve paralysis. Diaphragmatic dysfunction should not be overlooked in postoperative care, and the amelioration of this compromise in respiratory mechanics is an important aspect of good patient management.     

Normal inspiratory muscle strength is restored more rapidly after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Respiratory complications after laparotomy cholecystectomy may result from generalised muscle weakness and fatigue, or from reduced respiratory muscle function secondary to an upper abdominal incision. In a prospective study we compared maximal inspiratory effort (Pimax/mmHg) and dominant hand grip strength (kPa) (expressed as a percentage of zero hour value) in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy (OC) (n = 12), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (n = 25) and a control group of patients undergoing lower limb surgery (n = 12). Of the 12 OC patients, three suffered respiratory complications: two had atelectasis and one a chest infection, compared with no such complications in the other two groups (P < 0.05). Pimax decreased postoperatively in all groups (P < 0.05) and had returned to normal by 48 h in the LC and control groups. In contrast, in the OC group Pimax fell from 112.5 +/- 17.8 mmHg to as low as 81.3 +/- 16.5 mmHg at 72 h and only returned to preoperative levels at 120 h. The hand grip strength fell significantly in all groups at 24 h (P < 0.05) but normal levels were achieved again by 48 h in all groups, and there was no significant difference in the hand grip strength between the groups over the 5 days. These results suggest that generalised muscle fatigue after surgery is similar after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Open cholecystectomy does, however, cause a more prolonged reduction in respiratory muscle function and this is likely to contribute to the higher incidence of respiratory complications in this group of patients.     

Recruitment of some respiratory muscles during three maximal inspiratory manoeuvres.

BACKGROUND--A study was undertaken to determine the level of recruitment of the muscles used in the generation of respiratory muscle force, and to ascertain whether maximal diaphragmatic force and maximal inspiratory muscle force need to be measured by separate tests. The level of activity of three inspiratory muscles and one expiratory muscle during three maximal respiratory manoeuvres was studied: (1) maximal inspiration against a closed airway (Muller manoeuvre or maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)); (2) maximal inspired manoeuvre followed by a maximal expiratory effort (combined manoeuvre); and (3) maximal inspiratory sniff through the nose (sniff manoeuvre). METHODS--All the manoeuvres were performed from functional residual capacity. The gastric (PGA) and oesophageal (POES) pressures and their difference, transdiaphragmatic pressure (PDI), and the integrated EMG activity of the diaphragm (EDI), the sternomastoid (ESTR), the intercostal parasternals (ERIC), and the rectus abdominis muscles (ERA) were recorded. RESULTS--Mean (SD) PDI values for the Muller, combined, and sniff manoeuvres were: 127.6 (19.4), 162.7 (22.2), and 136.6 (24.8) cm H2O, respectively. The pattern of rib cage muscle recruitment (POES/PDI) was similar for the Muller and sniff manoeuvres (88% and 80% respectively), and was 58% in the combined manoeuvre, confirming data previously reported in the literature. Peak EDI amplitude was greater during the sniff manoeuvre in all subjects (100%) than during the combined (88.1%) and Muller (61.1%) manoeuvres. ESTR and EIC were more active in the Muller and the sniff manoeuvres. The contribution of the expiratory muscle (ERA) to the three manoeuvres was 100% in the combined, 26.1% for the sniff, and 11.5% for the Muller manoeuvre. CONCLUSIONS--Each of these three manoeuvres results in different mechanisms of inspiratory and expiratory muscle activation and the intrathoracic and intra-abdominal pressures generated are a reflection of the interaction between the various muscle groups. The Muller and sniff manoeuvres reflect mainly the force of the inspiratory muscles and the combined manoeuvre that of the diaphragm.     

Repetitive stimulation of phrenic nerves in myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: In the investigation of patients with myasthenia gravis, repetitive supramaximal stimulation of an affected peripheral nerve is commonly performed to detect abnormal transmission at the neuromuscular junction. A study was undertaken to determine whether abnormal transmission could similarly be detected during stimulation of the phrenic nerves. METHODS: The phrenic nerves were stimulated supramaximally with surface electrodes in 13 patients with myasthenia gravis and in 16 control subjects (six control patients with diaphragmatic weakness but not with myasthenia and ten normal subjects). The amplitude of diaphragm muscle action potentials was measured with surface electrodes during phrenic nerve stimulation at frequencies of 1-5 Hz for 3-4 seconds. RESULTS: In five patients with myasthenia gravis, a significant decrement (15-43% decrease) occurred in the amplitude of diaphragm muscle action potential during stimulation at 3 Hz. When stimulation frequency was reduced to 1 Hz, diaphragm muscle action potentials returned to their original amplitude within 4-5 seconds. The decrement in the amplitude of the diaphragm muscle action potential was reduced temporarily in three of four patients after the administration of intravenous edrophonium chloride (Tensilon). There was no significant change (< 10% decrease) in the amplitude of diaphragm muscle action potentials during stimulation at increased frequencies either in the 16 control subjects or in eight of the patients with myasthenia gravis. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in the amplitude of diaphragm muscle action potential occurred in five of 13 patients with myasthenia gravis during phrenic nerve stimulation at 3 Hz but in none of the control subjects. This may be a useful and non-invasive method for identifying patients with myasthenia gravis in whom weakness of the diaphragm is suspected.     

Effect of abdominal binders on breathing in tetraplegic patients.

We studied the effect on breathing of a conventional and a newly designed abdominal binder in seven patients with complete tetraplegia. The indices of respiratory ability used were the transdiaphragmatic pressure on maximal sniff (sniff Pdi), the maximum static inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax), and the vital capacity (VC). These were measured in patients with and without binders, in the supine position, raised up to 70 degrees on a tilt table, and seated upright. When patients were raised from the supine to the 70 degrees tilt and to the seated posture, sniff Pdi and VC decreased. Both binders improved VC in the seated position and at 70 degrees tilt, and sniff Pdi at 70 degrees tilt. The new binder was as effective as but no better than the conventional binder. PImax was too variable to be a valuable index of inspiratory power. These findings support the view that abdominal binders assist breathing in tetraplegic patients who are seated or raised to near vertical positions.     

Limitations of measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure in detecting diaphragmatic weakness.

Intrathoracic (oesophageal), intra-abdominal (gastric), and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) pressures were studied in 20 untrained, healthy subjects during a full inspiration and repeated maximal static inspiratory efforts. The pattern of pressure generation during these two types of respiratory manoeuvre was highly reproducible in each subject. By contrast, it varied over a wide range among individuals. In particular a substantial number of subjects naturally had a strong recruitment of their intercostal and accessory muscles and thus, low Pdi values, during both slowly performed and forceful inspiratory manoeuvres. These observations make it clear that Pdi values, as usually obtained, are commonly open to misinterpretation. For this approach to ensure a reliable assessment of diaphragmatic function and detect diaphragm weakness adequately, it appears essential either to monitor the abdominothoracic configuration or to standardise the pattern of respiratory muscle contraction.     

Recovery of costal and crural diaphragmatic contractility from partial paralysis

Since the two muscles (costal and crural) that constitute the diaphragm are separate and histologically different, their individual recovery pattern from neuromuscular blockade also may be different. Therefore, we studied the recovery of force and shortening in the in vivo diaphragm from atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in seven pentobarbital anesthetized dogs to assess segmental differences. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), shortening of costal and crural segments, integrated electromyogram (EMG), and tidal volume (VT) were measured during spontaneous breathing. After atracurium had reduced VT to 30% of control, breathing parameters were followed until recovered to 90% of control values. In addition, force-frequency curves generated by supramaximal tetanic stimuli of the phrenic nerve were measured. Recovery times for tidal Pdi, tidal EMG, tidal shortening, low-frequency shortening, and twitch Pdi were twice as fast as for VT (40 +/- 4 min), reflecting a slower rate of recovery of accessory inspiratory muscles. High-frequency recovery was typically slower than that of VT. During tidal breathing and tetanic stimulation, costal and crural shortening recovered simultaneously. On the other hand, comparison between costal and crural by analysis of pressure-shortening relationships showed a segmental difference (crural shortened 30% more than costal at the same Pdi), which implied reduced afterload on the crural segment. However, since shortening and pressure were linearly related during paralysis and recovery, measurements of Pdi alone can accurately reflect changes in contractile mass when heterogeneity and afterload are controlled.     

Effect of lung transplantation on diaphragmatic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND--To date there are no data on the effects of lung transplantation on diaphragmatic function in patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is not known whether the relation between the transdiaphragmatic pressure (PDI) and lung volume is altered in recipients after transplantation as a result of changes in diaphragmatic structure caused by chronic hyperinflation. The effect of lung transplantation on diaphragmatic strength was determined in patients with COPD and the relation between postoperative PDI and lung volume analysed. METHODS--Diaphragmatic strength was assessed in eight double lung transplant recipients, six single lung transplant recipients, and in 14 patients with COPD whose lung function was similar to those of the transplant recipients preoperatively. PDI obtained during unilateral and bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation at 1 Hz (twitch PDI) at functional residual capacity (FRC) and during maximal sniff manoeuvres (sniff PDI) at various levels of inspiratory vital capacity (VCin) served as parameters for diaphragmatic strength. Sniff PDI assessed at the various VCin levels were used to analyse the PDI/lung volume relation. RESULTS--Lung transplantation caused a reduction in lung volume, especially in the double lung transplant recipients. As a consequence sniff PDI was higher in the double lung transplant recipients than in the patients with COPD at all levels of VCin analysed. However, sniff PDI values analysed at comparable intrathoracic gas volumes were not reduced in the patients with COPD when compared with those who underwent lung transplantation. Bilateral twitch PDI values were similar in the patients with COPD and in the lung transplant recipients. In the single lung transplant recipients unilateral twitch PDI values were similar on the transplanted and the non-transplanted side. The relation between PDI and lung volume was similar in the patients with COPD and in the lung transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with COPD lung transplantation leads to an increase the maximal sniff induced PDI values by placing the diaphragm in a more favourable position for pressure generation. Since patients with COPD and postoperative lung transplant recipients showed similar PDI/lung volume relations, this suggests that chronic pulmonary hyperinflation does not cause major functional alterations of the diaphragm.     

Clinical assessment of diaphragm strength by cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of diaphragm strength can be difficult. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (PDI) measurements during volitional manoeuvres are useful but it may be difficult to ensure maximum patient effort. Magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves is easy to perform and the results are reproducible in normal subjects. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves in the assessment of diaphragm weakness in patients. METHODS: Sixty-six patients referred for assessment of respiratory muscle strength and 23 normal subjects were studied. Twitch PDI (TwPDI) following magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves and sniffPDI were obtained in all individuals. TWPDI following bilateral electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves was also obtained in eight patients. RESULTS: Mean (SD) TwPdi for the normal subjects was 31 (6) cm H2O and 18 (11) cm H2O for the patients. TwPDI and sniffPDI were correlated (r = 0.77). Seven of the 37 patients (19%) with a reduced sniffPDI had a TwPDI within the normal range whereas two of the 32 patients (6%) with a reduced TwPDI had a normal sniffPDI. TwPDI was similar with magnetic and electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: TwPDI following magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves is a clinically useful measurement when assessing diaphragm weakness.