Steady-state pharmacokinetics of twice-daily dosing of saquinavir plus ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE: To compare the steady state plasma pharmacokinetics of 1000 mg of saquinavir (SQV) in a soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation in combination with 100 mg of ritonavir (RTV) (capsules) in a twice-daily dosing regimen in HIV-1-infected individuals with historical controls who used 400 mg of SQV in a hard-gel capsule (HGC) formulation in combination with 400 mg of RTV and to investigate the plasma pharmacokinetics of the 1000 mg/100 mg regimen after normal and high-fat breakfasts. DESIGN: Open-label, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study. METHODS: Six HIV-1-infected individuals who used either 1200 mg of SQV (SGC or HGC) three times daily or 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily were included. Each patient was switched to 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily. After 14 days, the patients came to the hospital for assessment of a pharmacokinetic profile during 12 hours. Patients were randomized to receive a high-fat (+/-45 g of fat) or normal (+/-20 g of fat) breakfast. After 7 days, a second pharmacokinetic profile was assessed after ingestion of the drugs with the alternate breakfast. A noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0-12h), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the plasma trough concentration (C12h), and the elimination half-life in plasma (t1/2). The obtained pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with those of 12 patients using SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily) in combination with RTV (400 mg twice daily). RESULTS: The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV SGC (1000 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 18.84 h*mg/L; Cmax, 3.66 mg/L; C12h, 0.40 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.0 hours. The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 6.99 h*mg/L; Cmax, 1.28 mg/L; C12h, 0.23 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.9 hours. The exposure to SQV in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily was significantly higher than the exposure to SQV in a dosing regimen of 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters of SQV SGC in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily were not significantly different after ingestion of a high-fat or normal breakfast (p >.35). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily resulted in a higher exposure to SQV compared with the exposure to SQV obtained when SQV is used in the 400 mg/400 mg twice-daily combination with RTV. In this small number of patients, no significant differences in exposure were seen after ingestion of either a normal or high-fat breakfast. From a pharmacokinetic perspective, the combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily seems to be a good option for further clinical evaluation.     

Increasing nevirapine dose can overcome reduced bioavailability due to rifampicin coadministration

We studied the effect of rifampicin on steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine and the impact of increasing the dose of nevirapine on its peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) levels in 13 HIV-infected patients on regular antiretroviral treatment with nevirapine-containing regimens (200 mg twice daily). A baseline pharmacokinetic study was conducted and repeated after 1 week of daily rifampicin (450/600 mg). The study was repeated in 7 of 8 patients who had subtherapeutic Cmin nevirapine levels after increasing nevirapine dose to 300 mg twice daily. Liver function was monitored. Rifampicin caused significant reductions in Cmax (42%), Cmin (53%), and exposure (46%) of nevirapine (P <.01). The Cmin of nevirapine fell below the therapeutic range of 3 microg/ml in 8 of 13 patients. An increase of nevirapine to 300 mg twice daily raised Cmin to therapeutic range in all 7 patients without exceeding the toxic level of 12 microg/mL. There were no clinical or laboratory adverse events. Our findings suggest that decreased bioavailability of nevirapine because of rifampicin coadministration could be overcome by increasing the dose of nevirapine from 200 to 300 mg twice daily without short-term adverse events. Further studies to evaluate the long-term safety of higher dose of nevirapine are required.     

Coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir and phenytoin results in two-way drug interaction through cytochrome P-450 induction

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate; it also may induce cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isozymes. Phenytoin (PHT) is a CYP3A4 inducer and CYP2C9/CYP2C19 substrate. This study quantified the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interaction between LPV/RTV and PHT. Open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, PK study in healthy volunteers. Subjects in arm A (n = 12) received LPV/RTV 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) (days 1-10), followed by LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID + PHT 300 mg once daily (QD) (days 11-22). Arm B (n = 12) received PHT 300 mg QD (days 1-11), followed by PHT 300 mg QD + LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID (days 12-23). Plasma samples were collected on day 11 and day 22; PK parameters were compared by geometric mean ratio (GMR, day 22:day 11). P values <0.05 were considered significant. Following PHT addition, LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h) decreased from 70.9 +/-37.0 to 49.6 +/- 25.1 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.67, P = 0.011) and C0h decreased from 6.0 +/- 3.2 to 3.6 +/- 2.3 microg/mL (GMR 0.54, P = 0.001). Following LPV/RTV addition, PHT AUC0-24h decreased from 191.0+/-89.2 to 147.8+/-104.5 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.69, P = 0.009) and C0h decreased from 7.0+/-4.0 to 5.3+/-4.1 microg/mL (GMR 0.66, P = 0.033). Concomitant LPV/RTV and PHT use results in a 2-way drug interaction. Phenytoin appears to increase LPV clearance via CYP3A4 induction, which is not offset by the presence of low-dose RTV. LPV/RTV may increase PHT clearance via CYP2C9 induction. Management should be individualized to each patient; dosage or medication adjustments may be necessary.     

Efficacy of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients with no baseline resistance-associated mutations to darunavir

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the potential of once-daily dosing with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in a HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patient population with no baseline darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). METHODS: Patients in the randomized controlled POWER 1 and 2 trials were treatment experienced, with > or =1 International AIDS Society-USA primary protease inhibitor (PI) mutation. The virological and immunological responses in patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily (n = 23), darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (n = 29), or currently available PI(s) (n = 28) plus an optimized background regimen were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 24 was 67% for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 62% for the group receiving darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (P = 0.774); both were superior to control PI(s) (11%; P < 0.0001). Mean HIV RNA change from baseline was 22.39 and 22.35 log10 copies per milliliter for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and for the group receiving 600/100 mg twice daily, respectively (P = 0.895); mean CD4 increases were 88 and 111 cells per milliliter, respectively (P = 0.526). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs achieved similar high responses with darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 600/100 mg twice daily. This suggests that once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg therapy, which has been shown effective in treatment-naive patients and is currently being studied in treatment-experienced patients, shows potential in patients with no darunavir RAMs.     

Dose reduction for the management of indinavir-related toxicity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients in Taiwan: clinical and pharmacokinetic assessment.

This study evaluated the feasibility of reducing the indinavir (IDV) dosage in Taiwanese patients receiving the standard IDV/ritonavir (RTV) dosage of 800/100 mg twice a day who had undetectable plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA but had developed IDV-related toxicities. After dosage reduction to IDV/RTV 600/100 mg twice a day, the dose-related toxicity decreased and plasma HIV RNA remained undetectable at 24 weeks post-switch in all patients. The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of IDV decreased significantly (median, 6.3 vs 4.3 microg/mL and 1892 vs 1292 microg.min/mL, p=0.01 and 0.001, respectively) but the minimal plasma concentration remained at a similar level (median, 1.0 vs 0.8 microg/mL, p=0.12). This study found that the reduction in the dosage of IDV in HIV-1 infected patients receiving the standard IDV/RTV regimen guided by therapeutic drug monitoring decreased the Cmax, dose-related toxicity and medical cost without compromising viral control.     

A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen provides noninferior antiviral activity compared with a twice-daily regimen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and noninferiority and to explore the efficacy of administration of once-daily versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected subjects. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparative study. METHODS: One hundred ninety antiretroviral-naive subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA level >1000 copies/mL and any CD4 cell count were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 800/200 mg administered once daily (n = 115) or lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 400/100 mg administered twice daily (n = 75). Subjects also received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at a dose of 300 mg and emtricitabine (FTC) at a dose of 200 mg administered once daily. RESULTS: The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 count were 4.8 log10 copies/mL and 216 cells/mm, respectively. Before week 48, 20% (once daily) and 29% (twice daily) subjects discontinued. Virologic responses of the subjects through 48 weeks were comparable; 70% (once daily) and 64% (twice daily) achieved an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL by intent-to-treat, noncompleter = failure analysis. No subject demonstrated LPV or TDF resistance, but 3 subjects (2 in the once-daily group, 1 in the twice-daily group) demonstrated FTC resistance. Mean increases in CD4 count were similar. Diarrhea (16% in the once-daily group, 5% in the twice-daily group; P = 0.036) was the most common moderate or severe study drug-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Through 48 weeks, a once-daily regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir + TDF + FTC appears to have similar virologic and immunologic responses in antiretroviral-naive subjects as the same regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir administered twice daily. Both regimens were relatively well tolerated, and no LPV or TDF resistance was observed.     

Switching to darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once‐daily containing regimen maintains virological control in fully suppressed pre‐treated patients infected with HIV‐1

The objective of this study was to evaluate the switch to once‐daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in treatment‐experienced patients with suppressed HIV‐1 replication on a twice‐daily ritonavir‐boosted protease‐inhibitor (bid PI/r) containing regimen, that is in a setting where genotypic resistance test cannot be performed. In this open label, non‐comparative, multicenter study, patients on a bid PI/r‐containing triple combination, with suppressed viral replication, were switched to once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing triple combination. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml 24 weeks after the switch. Intensive darunavir pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at Week 4 (W4) in 11 patients. Eighty‐five patients were enrolled. All had HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening with a pre‐exposure to a median of 2 PI/r (1–5). By intent‐to‐treat analysis (missing = failure), 78/85 patients (92%, 95% CI [83;96]) maintained an HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Seven patients experienced protocol‐defined treatment failure between baseline and W24: Two had confirmed low‐level viral rebound, one discontinued study treatment for adverse event, three withdrew their consent, and one was lost to follow‐up. By on‐treatment analysis, 78/80 patients (97%, 95% CI [91;99]) maintained an HIV‐RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Results were similar at Week 48. The median area under the darunavir plasma concentration–time curve measured in 11 patients was 61,380 ng hr/ml; darunavir median trough concentration 1,340 ng/ml and darunavir half‐life was 12.2 hr. Tolerability of once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg was excellent. Optimally suppressed, treatment‐experienced patients can switch safely from a twice‐daily PI/r regimen to a once‐daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing regimen. J. Med. Virol. 85:8–15, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A Clinical Study of the Combination of 100 mg Ritonavir plus 800 mg Indinavir as Salvage Therapy: Influence of Increased Plasma Drug Levels in the Rate of Response

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of indinavir (IDV) in a twice daily dosing regimen with coadministration of 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) and to explore the influence of plasma drug levels in the rate of virologic response. Method: We performed a prospective study of 59 patients who switched to a salvage regimen with two nucleoside analogs plus the combination of 100 mg RTV plus 800 mg IDV twice daily. Pharmacokinetics of IDV and RTV were assessed in 11 patients. Results: Previous antiretroviral exposure was 44 months, and 78% and 39% of patients had previously failed regimens with either IDV or RTV. Median CD4 count was 248 × 10⁶/L and HIV load was 3.9 log₁₀ copies/mL. The median number of mutations in the protease gene was 9 (3–14), predominantly at residues 82 (53%), 90 (42%), and 46 (32%). After 24 weeks, 61% of patients had a viral load decrease greater than 1 log₁₀, and 38% had a viral load below 50 copies/mL. Nephrolitiasis, hematuria, or flank pain was observed in 13 patients (22%), leading to withdrawal in six cases (10%). IDV trough levels were well above the IC₉₅ (median 1.75 mg/L, interquartile range 1.07-2.57), but RTV trough levels were below the IC₉₅ in 88% of patients. There was a close correlation between higher peak levels of IDV, virological response, and renal toxicity. Conclusion: RTV/IDV 100/800 mg in a twice daily dosing regimen is associated with a significant virological response in patients with antiretroviral treatment failure. The correlation between plasma drug levels, toxicity, and response suggests the usefulness of individualized drug monitoring.     

Comparison of two indinavir/ritonavir regimens in the treatment of HIV-infected individuals

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) for salvage therapy is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/RTV at 800/200 mg (arm A) and 400/400 mg (arm B) administered twice daily in HIV-infected subjects failing their first PI-based regimen. METHODS: A phase I/II, randomized, open-label, 24-week study was conducted. Formal 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed, and study visits occurred at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and every 4 week thereafter for 24 weeks. Clinical symptoms and laboratory assessments were collected. Subjects were allowed to switch arms because of toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were enrolled (22 per arm). IDV predose concentration, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher in arm A. Fifty-five percent and 45% of subjects in arms A and B responded (<200 copies/mL at week 24; P = 0.76), respectively. CD4 cell responses were similar. All subjects had IDV-sensitive virus at baseline and at virologic failure. Tolerability was comparable, but all grade 3 or higher triglyceride increases occurred in arm B and more subjects in arm B switched because of toxicity (5 vs. 1 triglyceride increases). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest formal pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 dosage combinations of IDV/RTV in HIV-infected individuals. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous results in patients but lower than in seronegative controls. Both regimens exhibited similar tolerability and response rates. High toxicity with a low response suggests that the optimum IDV/RTV combination would include an RTV dose <400 mg and an IDV dose <800 mg in this population.     

A 14-day dose-response study of the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients

Tipranavir (TPV), a novel nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI), was administered to treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients over 14 days in a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation, in combination with ritonavir (RTV). Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 were randomized to receive TPV 1200 mg twice daily (TPV 1200), 10 patients received TPV 300 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 300/200), and 11 patients received TPV 1200 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 1200/200). The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 4.96 log10 copies/mL and 244 cells/mm, respectively. After 14 days, the median decrease in viral load was -0.77 log10 in the TPV 1200 group, -1.43 log10 in the TPV/r 300/200 group, and -1.64 log10 in the TPV/r 1200/200 group. TPV exposure was increased by 24- and 70-fold in the TPV/r 300/200 and 1200/200 groups, respectively, compared with TPV 1200 alone. There were no significant differences across treatment arms with regard to drug-related adverse events. TPV/r appeared to be safe, effective, and well tolerated during 14 days of treatment.     

A retrospective, cohort-based survey of patients using twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir combinations: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens DESIGN: A cohort-based survey of HIV-infected patients who either used indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg twice daily or indinavir 400 mg + ritonavir 400 mg twice daily. METHODS: Data were extracted from a database of samples sent to our laboratory for measurement of indinavir + ritonavir plasma concentrations. Patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy measurements were collected by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: 100 Patients using 800-mg indinavir + 100-mg ritonavir twice daily and 32 patients using 400-mg indinavir + 400-mg ritonavir twice daily were eligible. Median peak and trough concentrations of indinavir were 6.8 and 0.77 mg/L in the 800/100 group and 2.6 and 0.45 mg/L in the 400/400 group. The most frequently found side effects were nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 22.1% and 34.9% of the patients in the 800/100 and the 400/400 groups, respectively. Viral load data were analyzed for patients who switched from 800-mg indinavir three times daily to one of the indinavir + ritonavir twice daily regimens. At the time of switch 63% (800/100 group) and 60% (400/400 group) had an undetectable viral load and this increased to 77% and 70%, respectively, during follow-up. Patients who switched to the 400/400 group discontinued treatment more frequently than patients who switched to the 800/100 group (70% vs. 26%, p =.008). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir + ritonavir regimens show improved pharmacokinetic properties, allowing twice-daily dosing with food. Clinical data suggest that safety and efficacy is at least as good as with indinavir three-times-daily regimens without ritonavir. Prospective, comparative trials are needed to properly assess the role in HIV therapy of these twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens.     

Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo

BACKGROUND: Intranasal corticosteroids used with antibiotics are known to improve rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with antibiotic therapy alone. However, the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid monotherapy for acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis is not established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) versus amoxicillin and placebo in patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects (> or =12 years; N = 981) were randomized to MFNS 200 microg once daily or twice daily for 15 days, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, or respective placebo. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean am/pm major symptom score over the treatment phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total symptom score. Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily was significantly superior to placebo (P < .001) and amoxicillin (P = .002) at improving major symptom score. Starting on day 2, MFNS 200 microg twice daily improved total symptom score throughout treatment versus amoxicillin (P = .012) and placebo (P < .001). Global response to treatment was significantly greater with MFNS 200 microg twice daily versus amoxicillin (P = .013) and placebo (P = .001). Although significantly superior to placebo, MFNS 200 microg once daily was not superior to amoxicillin for the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, MFNS 200 microg twice daily produced significant symptom improvements versus amoxicillin and placebo, without predisposing the patient to disease recurrence or bacterial infection.     

Similar Virologic and Immunologic Efficacy With Fosamprenavir Boosted With 100 mg or 200 mg of Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Patients: Results of the LESS Trial

Abstract

Purpose: Ritonavir (RTV) effectively boosts most protease inhibitors but is associated with significant dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). In an effort to better manage toxicities through a reduced dose of RTV, this study compared fosamprenavir (FPV) boosted with RTV 100 mg (FPV/r100) or with RTV 200 mg (FPV/r200) daily. Methods: This 24-week, open-label study enrolled patients taking a FPV/r200-containing regimen who had HIV RNA <400 copies/mL and randomized them 1:2 to continue that regimen or simplify to FPV/r100 once daily. Other medications were not altered. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients without suspected or confirmed virologic failure (HIV RNA ≥400 copies/mL) through week 24 by a missing/discontinuation equals failure (M/D=F) analysis. Noninferiority criteria were demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint rates between groups was greater than ?12. Results: The 2 regimens met prespecified noninferiority criteria (FPV/r100, 92%; FPV/r200, 94%; 95% CI, ?9.36 to 5.12). At week 24, the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by M/ D=F was 83% in the FPV/r100 group and 85% in the FPV/r200 group. Drug-related grade 2?4 AEs were uncommon (FPV/r100, 4%; FPV/r200, 7%). Median changes in lipids were similar in both groups, with the exception of triglycerides (FPV/r100, ?21 mg/dL; FPV/r200, ?2 mg/dL). Conclusions: This 24-week study demonstrated that among previously suppressed patients, once-daily FPV/r100 was similar to FPV/r200 in virologic and immunologic effects but was associated with greater decreases from baseline in triglyceride levels.     

Mometasone furoate: efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared with beclomethasone dipropionate.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). OBJECTIVE: MF-DPI was evaluated for safety and efficacy and compared with placebo DPI and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 227), 13 to 75 years of age, maintained on inhaled glucocorticoids before entering the trial, were randomized to receive: MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily, BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily, or placebo in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study. RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) significantly improved for all three active treatments compared with placebo (P < .01, all comparisons). The response to MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily treatment was approximately twice as large as the response to MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily or BDP MDI treatment, although the differences between these groups did not reach statistical significance. Secondary efficacy variables including PEFR, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and albuterol use showed similar trends. The MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily and BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily treatment groups produced comparable results for all efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: MF-DPI, 100 microg and 200 microg, twice daily were well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function and symptom control in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. In this study, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily seemed to be the most effective dosage.     

Atazanavir Plasma Concentrations Vary Significantly Between Patients and Correlate with Increased Serum Bilirubin Concentrations

Abstract

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is recommended to be dosed at 400 mg once daily or 300 mg daily coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV). Method: 31 male patients receiving ATV either alone or boosted with RTV for more than 2 weeks had ATV concentration measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). ATV concentrations were adjusted to obtain a 24-hour trough level using a standard pharmacokinetic formula. Results: 25 samples were taken from patients who received 300 mg ATV, 6 with 200 mg, 3 with 400 mg, and 2 with 150 mg, all boosted with 100 mg RTV. In the unboosted group, patients received 400 mg (7) or 600 mg (2). The median adjusted 24-hour trough ATV concentration was 630 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 355-1034) in the boosted and 113 ng/mL (IQR 50-225) in the unboosted group (p = .001). Median serum bilirubin concentration was 34 IU/L (IQR 27.5-49) and 41 IU/L (IQR 31-45) in the boosted and unboosted groups, respectively. In the boosted group, high ATV concentrations were significantly correlated with increased serum bilirubin concentrations (p = .003). Conclusion: ATV concentrations showed considerable interpatient variability. Bilirubin concentrations are an indicator of high ATV concentrations and may prove to be useful in selecting patients for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).     

Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Despite current recommendations, many patients with persistent asthma are still treated with bronchodilators alone. OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. METHODS: All patients (306 patients; age range, 12-70 years) were given a diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment in this 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy variable was change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit). RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV(1) was significantly improved (P < or =.02) after MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment and MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment (16.0% and 16.1%, respectively) compared with placebo (5.5%). The improvement seen with MF-DPI 200 microg once daily morning treatment (10.4%) was not significantly different from that with placebo. Secondary efficacy variables also showed significant improvement for the MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment group and the MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment group compared with the placebo group. All doses of MF administered by means of a DPI were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that a total daily dose of 400 microg of MF administered by means of a DPI is an effective treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. This treatment was equally effective when administered either as a once daily or twice daily regimen.     

Asthma control can be maintained when fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in a single inhaler is stepped down

BACKGROUND: Asthma control is the goal of treatment, but little data exist to support treatment strategies for stepping down treatment once control has been achieved. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether either the long-acting beta2-agonist or corticosteroid could be reduced without loss of asthma control once control had been attained with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC). METHODS: After 12 weeks of open-label treatment with FSC 250/50 microg twice daily, patients whose asthma was well controlled were randomized to FSC 100/50 microg twice daily or fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily. for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean morning peak expiratory flow over the randomized study period. Secondary endpoints included symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, and asthma control. RESULTS: During open-label treatment, improvements from baseline were seen, and 435 of 641 patients (68%) achieved well controlled status during each of the last 4 weeks of this period. A total of 246 patients received FSC 100/50 microg twice daily and 238 FP 250 microg twice daily. The adjusted mean change in morning peak expiratory flow from the end of open-label treatment was -0.3 L/min for FSC and -13.2 L/min for FP (treatment difference, 12.9 L/min; 95% CI, 8.1-17.6; P<.001). Secondary efficacy endpoints also showed FSC 100/50 microg twice daily to be more effective than FP 250 microg twice daily alone. The majority of patients remained well controlled, but the proportion was higher with FSC. CONCLUSION: In patients achieving asthma control with FSC 250/50 microg twice daily, stepping treatment down to a lower dose of FSC 100/50 microg twice daily is more effective than switching to an inhaled corticosteroid alone.     

Low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily for 27 months in children with mild asthma

This study is an extended follow-up for 24 months of a 12-week trial to study the long-term clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) once or twice daily in children with mild asthma. A total of 122 children (mean age 9.7 years, girls/boys; 42/80) with mild asthma (FEV1 103.7% of predicted, reversibility in FEV1 3.5%, and fall in FEV1 after exercise 12.2%), not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. The children were treated with inhaled BUD 100 or 200 microg administered via Turbuhaler once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily, or placebo for 27 months. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed at 3-month intervals the first year and at 6-month intervals the second year, in a total of seven visits. A significant dose-response effect favoring BUD 200 microg daily (vs 100 microg daily) was found when comparing changes in FEV1, FEF25%, and FEV50%; the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test; and the effect on blood eosinophils. Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine decreased significantly on three visits in patients treated with BUD 200 microg daily compared to placebo. Growth rate was not significantly affected except in children aged 7-11 years at baseline after 12 months of treatment. In conclusion, 100 or 200 microg daily of inhaled BUD for 27 months is safe and effective in protecting against exercise-induced asthma and achieving nearly normal lung function. Baseline lung function was not significantly affected in this group of children with mild asthma.