Cefdinir: an advanced-generation,broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin

BACKGROUND: Cefdinir is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin antimicrobial agent that has been approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute maxillary sinusitis, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, acute bacterial otitis media, and uncomplicated skin and skin-structure infections in adult and pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to review the in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, and potential role of cefdinir. METHODS: Studies were identified by a MEDLINE search (January 1983-September 2001) of the English-language medical literature, a review of identified articles and their bibliographies, and a review of data on file with the manufacturer. Clinical efficacy data were selected from all published trials mentioning cefdinir. Information concerning in vitro susceptibility, safety, chemistry, and the pharmacokinetic profile of cefdinir also was reviewed. RESULTS: Cefdinir has a broad spectrum of activity against many gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by 13 of the common beta-lactamases. It is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (mean time to peak plasma concentration, 3 hours) and is almost entirely eliminated via renal clearance of unchanged drug. The terminal disposition half-life of cefdinir is approximately 1.5 hours. Efficacy has been demonstrated in 19 clinical trials in adults and children with upper and lower respiratory tract infections (eg, pharyngitis, sinusitis, acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia), and skin and skin-structure infections. The adverse-event profile is similar to that of comparator agents, although in 4 adult and adolescent studies and 1 adult study, diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently in cefdinir recipients than in recipients of penicillin V, cephalexin, cefaclor, and cefprozil. CONCLUSIONS: Cefdinir is an alternative to other antimicrobial agents and can be dosed once or twice daily for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and skin-structure infections. Similar to other oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, cefdinir has activity against common pathogens of the respiratory tract and skin and is stable in the presence of selected beta-lactamases. The clinical choice of an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin will be based on patient acceptance, frequency of administration, and cost.     

Cefdinir: an expanded-spectrum oral cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE: To review the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of cefdinir, an expanded-spectrum oral cephalosporin. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search (January 1983-November 1999) of the medical literature, review of English-language literature and bibliographies of these articles, and product information. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical efficacy data were selected from all published trials mentioning cefdinir. Additional information concerning in vitro susceptibility, safety, chemistry, and pharmacokinetic profile of cefdinir was also reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Cefdinir, an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, has a broad spectrum of activity against many gram-negative and -positive aerobic organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by many common beta-lactamases. Cefdinir is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and is primarily eliminated via renal clearance of unchanged drug. The terminal disposition half-life of cefdinir is approximately 1.5 hours. Efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of clinical trials in adults and children with upper and lower respiratory tract infections (e.g., pharyngitis, sinusitis, acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia) and skin and skin-structure infections. The adverse event profile is similar to that of comparator agents. CONCLUSIONS: Cefdinir is a second-line alternative to first-line antimicrobial agents, with convenient once- or twice-daily dosing in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and skin-structure infections. Similar to other oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, cefdinir has activity against common pathogens of the respiratory tract and skin and is stable in the presence of many beta-lactamases. The clinical choice of an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin will be based on patient acceptance, frequency of administration, and cost.     

Potency and spectrum reevaluation of cefdinir tested against pathogens causing skin and soft tissue infections: a sample of North American isolates

Cefdinir is a widely used orally administered cephalosporin for community-acquired respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). A total of 415 nonduplicate isolates of community-acquired SSTI (CA-SSTI) were collected from medical centers in North America and susceptibility tested against cefdinir and various compounds indicated for the treatment of CA-SSTI. The cefdinir MIC(50/90) in microg/mL/% susceptible for strains of the 7 principal CA-SSTI pathogens were: oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (0.5/0.5/100%), oxacillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.06/0.12/100%), group A streptococci (< or =0.03/< or =0.03/100%), group B streptococci (< or =0.03/0.06/100%), viridans group streptococci (0.25/2/88%), Klebsiella spp. (0.12/1/95%), and Escherichia coli (0.25/0.5/95%). Cefdinir was the most potent oral cephalosporin tested against staphylococci and the Enterobacteriaceae species, and 8-fold to 64-fold more potent than cephalexin against these pathogens. Beta-Hemolytic streptococci was highly susceptible to cefdinir (MIC(90), < or =0.03-0.06 microg/mL), while viridans group streptococci showed slightly elevated MIC results. Cephalexin MIC values for streptococcal strains (MIC(90), 1-32 microg/mL) were 32-fold to 64-fold higher than those of cefdinir or other oral cephalosporins evaluated. Only 0.5% of all 415 recent CA-SSTI pathogens were resistant to cefdinir (MIC, > or = 4 mg/L). Cefdinir showed a spectrum and potency comparable or superior to other orally administered beta-lactams (cephalexin).     

Contemporary evaluation of the in vitro activity and spectrum of cefdinir compared with other orally administered antimicrobials tested against common respiratory tract pathogens (2000-2002)

Cefdinir is an oral cephalosporin approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997 for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, pharyngitis-tonsillitis, community-acquired pneumonia, acute maxillary sinusitis, and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in adults and adolescents, and acute otitis media, pharyngitis-tonsillitis, and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in children. Although cefdinir showed similar activity to other cephalosporins in the early studies, very limited data has been generated over the last decade. In this report, we summarize the contemporary in vitro activity and spectrum of cefdinir in comparison to numerous other orally administrated antimicrobials available for treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. A total of 8,326 non-duplicate recent clinical isolates, including Haemophilus influenzae (3,438), Moraxella catarrhalis (1,688), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (3,200), were collected from 35 medical centers in North America during 2000 through 2002, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods. Pneumococcal susceptibility patterns for beta-lactams and macrolides were also analyzed according to the year of isolation and the age group of the patients. Cefdinir had the greatest activity against H. influenzae among the cephalosporins tested with susceptibility rates of 97.1 to 99.0%. All of the agents tested had complete or near complete activity against M. catarrhalis. Against S. pneumoniae, cefdinir and other cephalosporins showed similar susceptibility patterns, but improved rates were observed in 2002 (78.5-79.4%) when compared to the previous monitored period (71.8-74.5%). This increase in susceptibility was mainly because of a declining the occurrence of high-level penicillin resistance (MIC >/=2 microg/ml) across all age groups. Macrolide resistance also decreased among S. pneumoniae in 2002 when compared to 2000 through 2001; however, resistance to levofloxacin continued to increase from 0.9% in 2000 to 1.4% in 2002. These results indicate a significant change in emerging beta-lactam resistance patterns (including cefdinir) with a decrease possibly influenced by greater pneumococcal vaccine use in children and the elderly. These rates of increased susceptibility could sustain and enhance the clinical activity of orally administered beta-lactams such as cefdinir.     

Susceptibility of Recent Bacterial Isolates to Cefdinir and Selected Antibiotics among Children with Urinary Tract Infections

Background: Cefdinir, an extended‐spectrum cephalosporin administered orally, is approved by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration for treatment of skin and respiratory tract infections. During the last two years at the authors' institution, this agent has been used as an off‐label treatment for urinary tract infections in children. Objectives: To evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility testing data in children to determine whether there is support for this prescribing practice. Methods: In this retrospective study (2003–2004), the authors compared the susceptibility patterns of urinary pathogens to cefdinir and selected antibiotics in children who were evaluated for urinary tract infections in an urban tertiary academic pediatric emergency department. Pathogens (community acquired vs. opportunistic or nosocomial) were categorized as susceptible, indeterminate, or resistant on the basis of antibiotic susceptibility breakpoints. The frequency of these categorizations for individual drugs was determined. Results: Seven hundred five isolates were recovered from urine during the study period. Pathogens isolated most frequently were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp, and Proteus spp. Of 431 isolates retained in the data set, 412 (95.6%) were susceptible to cefdinir. This rate was comparable or superior to rates observed for other antibiotics: 49.4% for ampicillin, 84.9% for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, 88.4% for cefazolin, 93.3% for nitrofurantoin, 94.2% for ticarcillin–clavulanate potassium, 97.5% for gentamicin, and 97.7% for ceftriaxone. Cefdinir, however, had lower activity (64.7%) against 17 bacterial isolates categorized as opportunistic or nosocomial pathogens. Conclusions: Cefdinir provides good coverage against common pathogens responsible for urinary tract infections in children and compares favorably with other oral and parenteral antibiotics that are used in the empiric treatment of this infection.     

In vitro activity evaluations of cefdinir (FK482, CI-983, and PD134393). A novel orally administered cephalosporin.

Cefdinir, a so-called third-generation oral cephalosporin was tested in vitro against over 700 pathogens from patients with bacteremia. Cefdinir was very active against the Enterobacteriaceae with a 50% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) value range of less than or equal to 0.03-8 micrograms/ml. The enteric species having the highest MIC90S (greater than or equal to 16 micrograms/ml) were Citrobacter freundii, and the enterobacters, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, and Serratia marcescens. Cefdinir was generally two- to fourfold less active than cefixime, but markedly more potent with a wider spectrum compared with older oral cephalosporins, cefaclor or cefuroxime. In contrast to cefixime, cefdinir inhibited Staphylococcus aureus (MIC90, 1 micrograms/ml) and other staphylococci. Pneumococci, beta-hemolytic streptococci, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and pathogenic Neisseria spp. (MIC90S, 0.12-0.5 micrograms/ml) were cefdinir susceptible, but Pseudomonas aeruginosa, oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and Bacteroides fragilis gr. strains were resistant. Cefdinir was generally bactericidal with a minimal inoculum effect at 10(6) colony-forming units per spot. Cefdinir beta-lactamase hydrolysis by some recently described extended broad spectrum beta-lactamases was suspected. Cefdinir exhibited a wide, balanced spectrum for an oral cephalosporin indicating possible clinical use against susceptible pathogens in respiratory tract, urinary tract, genital and cutaneous infections.     

Study of use of cefdinir versus cephalexin for treatment of skin infections in pediatric patients. The Cefdinir Pediatric Skin Infection Study Group.

Three hundred ninety-four patients, aged 6 months to 12 years, entered a multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study comparing cefdinir, 7 mg/kg of body weight twice a day, with cephalexin, 10 mg/kg four times a day, each given for 10 days. The most common infections treated were impetigo and secondary infection of preexisting dermatitis. The most common pathogens isolated were Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Two hundred thirty-one patients were microbiologically evaluable. Microbiologic eradication rates were 164 of 165 pathogens (99.4%) in the cefdinir group and 152 of 156 pathogens (97.4%) in the cephalexin group (P = 0.14). Clinical cure rates were 116 of 118 patients (98.3%) in the cefdinir group and 106 of 113 patients (93.8%) in the cephalexin group (P = 0.056). Sixteen percent of cefdinir patients and 11% of cephalexin patients experienced adverse events (P = 0.11), the most common being diarrhea, which affected 8% of the cefdinir group and 4% of the cephalexin group. Cefdinir appears to be an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in pediatric patients.     

Gatifloxacin in community-based treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in the elderly

The elderly are at increased risk for respiratory tract infections. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gatifloxacin in adults of any age with community-acquired respiratory tract infections, this open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study in community-based practices enrolled male and female outpatients at least 18 years old with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute-bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), or acute uncomplicated maxillary sinusitis. Gatifloxacin 400 mg was administered once daily for seven to 14 days. Of 14781 clinically evaluable patients, 2505 were at least 65 years old, 499, at lest 80. Cure rates for CAP, AECB, and sinusitis ranged from 91.6% to 95.5% for patients less than 65 years old, 91.1% to 96.2% for those 65 to 79 years of age, and 89.5% to 94.8% for those at least 80 years old. Each age group, including patients with concomitant cardiovascular or diabetic conditions, tolerated treatment well. Gatifloxacin is efficacious and well tolerated in adult outpatients of any age with respiratory tract infections and is an important therapeutic option, particularly in communities with a high prevalence of resistant pathogens.     

Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefdinir and amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis. Cefdinir Sinusitis Study Group.

Cefdinir is an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin that is active against pathogens commonly seen in acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis (ACABS), including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Two randomized, investigator-blind, multicenter trials (one in the United States and one in Europe) compared two dosage regimens of cefdinir (600 mg once a day for 10 days and 300 mg twice a day for 10 days) to amoxicillin-clavulanate (A-C) (500 mg three times a day for 10 days) for adult and adolescent patients with ACABS. Twelve hundred twenty-nine patients entered the U.S. study, 698 with antral puncture; 569 patients entered the European study, all with antral puncture. Clinical response (cure or improvement) was determined 7 to 14 days and 3 to 5 weeks posttherapy. Microbiologic eradication rates were determined 10 to 30 days posttherapy in a subset of patients who underwent pre- and posttherapy sinus aspirate culture. Rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were examined. Cefdinir, given once or twice daily, was as effective clinically (approximately 90% cure rate) as amoxicillin-clavulanate given three times daily in the treatment of ACABS. Microbiologic eradication rates were also similar in the three groups. The major side effect was mild diarrhea, occurring in approximately 20% of each group. Cefdinir caused fewer adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and cefaclor in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

Cefprozil is a new oral semi-synthetic cephalosporin with broad antibacterial spectrum and prolonged serum elimination half-life. In vitro, cefprozil demonstrates excellent activity against common urinary tract pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Cefprozil, 500 mg once a day, was compared to cefaclor, 250 mg three times a day, in an open, randomized, comparative, clinical trial for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated, urinary tract infection. One hundred and two adult patients were eligible for safety evaluation; four patients were excluded due to side-effects (abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting). Ninety-eight patients were eligible for evaluation of efficacy. Clinical and bacteriological responses were comparable for both antibiotics. Leucopenia, nausea, and vaginal yeast infections were slightly more common in the cefprozil group. Cefprozil, 500 mg once daily, appears to be an appropriate alternative for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infections.     

Tedizolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Tedizolid is a newly approved drug of the oxazolidinone class. It has high in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains. Peak plasma concentration of tedizolid is obtained within 3 h of oral dosing (PO), with high bioavailability. Tedizolid is mostly metabolized via the liver, and is excreted in feces in the form of a sulfate conjugate. Tedizolid 200 mg taken once daily demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and a good safety profile in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Results of two pivotal Phase III clinical trials showed that 6 days of 200 mg tedizolid PO or sequential intravenous (IV)/PO once-daily treatment was non-inferior to 10 days of 600 mg linezolid PO or sequential IV/PO twice-daily treatment at 48–72 h (primary end point) and at the test-of-cure in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. The Phase II and Phase III trials also demonstrated that tedizolid was well tolerated.     

Update on the cefdinir spectrum and potency against pathogens isolated from uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in North America: are we evaluating the orally administered cephalosporins correctly?

The spectrum and potency of cefdinir, an orally administered cephalosporin, was reevaluated for the uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection (uSSTI) indication using contemporary isolates from 2004 to 2005. Cefdinir continues to have high rates of susceptibility against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (100.0%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (groups A and B; 100.0%), viridans group streptococci (88.9%), Escherichia coli (93.2%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (90.0%). No diminished activity was detected since the last evaluation (1997-2002 isolates), and cefdinir remains significantly more potent (4- to 16-fold) than cephalexin, even when using surrogate agents of cephalexin susceptibility that were suspect for estimating true clinical utility. Activity greater than cephalexin (4-fold) was also noted for cefdinir against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Cefdinir should be considered as a viable option for the therapy uSSTI caused by indicated species.     

Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in empiric management of pediatric infections

Beta-lactam antibiotics have long played a central role in the management of pediatric infections. However, widespread beta-lactam resistance among community- and hospital-acquired pathogens, mainly due to beta-lactamase production, has reduced the usefulness of these trusted and well-tolerated agents. Many regions have reported an increase in beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems as well as penicillins among clinically important Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. For some pathogens such as Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, virtually all strains worldwide are beta-lactamase producers. The development of beta-lactamase inhibitors for co-administration with a number of established beta-lactam agents has restored their usefulness in pediatric patients. The combination of ampicillin plus sulbactam has broad anti-aerobic and anti-anaerobic activity in vitro and achieves high concentrations in many body tissues and fluids. The availability of a mutual oral prodrug, sultamicillin, has enabled the development of an oral formulation. Excellent clinical response and bacterial eradication rates with ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin have been demonstrated for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, osteomyelitis, and meningitis in pediatric patients and neonates. Furthermore, many studies have demonstrated an excellent tolerability profile. Thus, ampicillin/sulbactam has an important role in the management of pediatric infections.     

Suction-induced blister fluid penetration of cefdinir in healthy volunteers following ascending oral doses.

The pharmacokinetics and suction-induced blister fluid penetration of cefdinir following single oral administrations of 200, 300, 400, and 600 mg were studied in 16 healthy young male volunteers according to a Latin square design. Plasma, blister, and urine samples were assayed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. We observed a nonlinear relationship (P = 0.02) between the dose and the maximum concentration in plasma as well as between the dose and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in plasma (P < 0.001), which may be indicative of a limited absorption process. This resulted in a lower AUC value than expected as well as a smaller fraction of cefdinir excreted unchanged at a dose of 600 mg. Renal clearance decreased with increasing doses (P < 0.006; analysis of variance with the Latin square design and Games-Howell procedure). Maximal cefdinir concentrations in blister fluid were delayed compared with concentrations in plasma. Blister fluid penetration measured by the ratio of the AUC in blister fluid to the AUC in plasma was extensive (92.4 to 108.4%). Cefdinir concentrations in blister fluid remained equal to or higher than the concentrations in plasma from 6 to 12 h following cefdinir administration. On the basis of the concentrations in blister fluid and the in vitro MIC data, we estimated that cefdinir at 200 to 400 mg administered twice daily would be adequate to treat uncomplicated skin infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. Seven volunteers experienced episodes of light-to-moderate diarrhea. These adverse events occurred irrespective of dose.     

Update of cefditoren activity tested against community-acquired pathogens associated with infections of the respiratory tract and skin and skin structures,including recent pharmacodynamic considerations

Antimicrobial resistance rates have noticeably increased among commonly isolated species associated with respiratory tract infections and skin and skin structure infections, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Cefditoren, an oral 3rd-generation–like cephalosporin, has been shown to be very active against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative species with favorable attributes including bactericidal activity and stability against many β-lactamase enzymes. Clinical trial data worldwide support the use of cefditoren for infections and species that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA). This review and a contemporary study report provide an update of clinical trial and in vitro data for cefditoren especially against pathogens within the spectrum of activity since 2002. A large collection of 7279 clinical isolates collected during 2002 and 2003 from medical centers in North and Latin America and Europe were tested to confirm cefditoren potency and spectrum compared with other oral cephalosporins and other class agents. Isolates were tested at a reference laboratory using reference broth microdilution methods. Cefditoren was shown to be active against nearly all (>99%) isolates of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae isolates (MIC₉₀, ≤0.03 μg/mL) and was the most potent orally administered cephalosporin against this organism. Cefditoren was the most active oral cephem tested against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC₉₀, ≤0.03 μg/mL) and had >99% activity versus both β-lactamase–positive and β-lactamase–negative isolates. The potency of cefditoren (MIC₉₀, 0.5 μg/mL) was similar to that of amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefdinir (MIC₉₀, 0.25 μg/mL) when tested against Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefditoren was the most potent cephalosporin tested against oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus with an MIC₉₀ value of only 1 μg/mL, and it was 100% active against the tested β-hemolytic streptococci. Using the data generated from the large collection of isolates tested in this global surveillance collection, as well as other summarized supporting studies and clinical trial information, we show that cefditoren has sustained in vitro activity and documented clinical efficacy for indications that have been approved by regulators (US-FDA).     

Role of long-acting cephalosporins in ambulatory therapy

Selected patients with community-acquired infections can be discharged from the hospital, when afebrile and stable, with parenteral antibiotic therapy continued on an ambulatory basis. This therapy is currently possible because of the availability of long-acting cephalosporins that can be administered once daily, often with substantial reductions in hospital costs. Cefonicid and ceftriaxone both have sufficiently long half-lives and either may be administered intramuscularly once daily. Their antibacterial spectra encompass many of the pathogens encountered in community-acquired infections of the lower respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue, bone, and urinary tract. Ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin, has a broader spectrum than the second-generation agent cefonicid. Ceftriaxone should generally be reserved for the treatment of gonococcal disease and of community- or hospital-acquired infections due to organisms resistant to the narrower-spectrum and less expensive long half-life agent cefonicid.     

Cefprozil versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute and uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Cefprozil Multicenter Study Group.

Cefprozil is a new oral cephalosporin with an in vitro spectrum of activity that includes the pathogens most commonly associated with acute and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs). A multicenter, randomized study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cefprozil, administered once daily, with cefaclor, administered three times a day, for ten days in patients 2 years of age or older who had acute and uncomplicated UTIs. The rate of satisfactory clinical response in evaluable patients was 87% in the cefprozil group and 84% in the cefaclor group. The patient bacteriologic response rates were also similar: 83% for cefprozil and 85% for cefaclor. The overall effective response rate for both cefprozil and cefaclor was 77%. Both drugs were well tolerated, with no difference in the incidence of drug-related adverse events. Because of its efficacy and once-daily dosing regimen, cefprozil may be an alternative to currently available oral antibiotics in the treatment of UTIs.     

头孢地尼等五种抗菌药物对呼吸道感染致病菌体外抗菌活性的研究

目的比较头孢地尼与其他4种抗菌药物对临床常见呼吸道致病菌的体外抗菌活性。方法采用琼脂稀释法测定对239株临床分离菌株的最低抑菌浓度。结果金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)对头孢地尼的敏感性最高，敏感率为100％，肺炎链球菌(包括PSSP、PISP)对头孢地尼的敏感性较高，敏感率为63．6％～100．0％。流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌对3种头孢菌素类抗菌药物比较敏感。肺炎克雷伯菌中产ESBL菌株对3种头孢菌素类抗菌药物耐药率为100％；非产ESBLs菌株对3种头孢菌素类抗菌药物的敏感率为73．1％～88．5％。结论头孢地尼与其他4种抗菌药物比较，对呼吸道常见致病菌有较强的抗菌活性。     

Role of linezolid in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). Antibiotic choices for these infections continue to evolve. History has seen penicillin progress to antistaphylococcal penicillins and cephalosporins, but these drugs are now giving way to drugs that are effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). While vancomycin has been the gold standard to treat MRSA infections, newer therapeutic options have been developed over the last 5 years. These include quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin, tigecycline and linezolid, which is the focus for this review. Linezolid is efficacious in the treatment of cSSTIs (including diabetic foot infections) caused by Gram-positive organisms (including MRSA), with a well-defined safety profile and straightforward dosing. It is also approved for nosocomial pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. Linezolid has an oral and parenteral formulation, which are equivalent. The oral formulation has the potential to offer economic benefits as compared with other therapies. Currently, there are only a few new antibiotics in development with MRSA activity. The proper use of all antibiotics, including these newer agents, is increasingly important if we are to slow the evolution of microbial resistance.     

Efficacy of twice-daily amoxycillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections

In this double-blind, double-dummy study, 324 patients with clinical evidence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were randomly assigned to receive 10 days' treatment with either amoxycillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily or amoxycillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily. At the end of therapy, clinical success rates were 92.4% for the twice daily regimen and 94.2% for the three times daily regimen. There was no statistically significant difference between treatments (p = 0.647) and the 95% confidence interval around the treatment difference indicated that the two treatments were equivalent. Treatment equivalence was also confirmed at follow-up, four weeks after the end of treatment. Both regimens were well tolerated. In conclusion, amoxycillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily is as effective as amoxycillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily for the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections and could improve patient compliance.