Comparative performances of an HTLV-I/II EIA and other serologic and PCR assays on samples from persons at risk for HTLV-II infection

BACKGROUND: HTLV-I and HTLV-II are related exogenous pathogenic human retroviruses. Until recently, ELISAs based on HTLV-I antigens have been used to screen for the presence of HTLV-I or -II antibodies. The HTLV-I-based assays have not been as sensitive in detecting antibodies to HTLV-II as in detecting antibodies to HTLV-I. The Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II ELISA uses a combination of HTLV-I and HTLV-II antigens to detect antibodies to the whole HTLV group. The performance of this ELISA was compared to that of several HTLV-I-based serologic assays and an HTLV-II PCR assay in cohorts of South American Indians and New York City IV drug users (IVDUs) in whom HTLV-II is endemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 429 South American Indians and New York City IVDUs were evaluated for HTLV antibodies by the use of three ELISAs (rgp21-enhanced HTLV-I/II, Cambridge Biotech; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, Organon Teknika; and HTLV-I/HTLV-II, Abbott), and a Western blot (WB) assay. Peripheral blood leukocyte DNA from each person was analyzed for HTLV-I and HTLV-II pol DNA via PCR. The HTLV-II PCR-positive samples were further subtyped via cloning and sequencing and/or oligomer restriction. RESULTS: Two hundred four samples (48%) were positive for HTLV-II by serologic and/or PCR assays. All of the positive samples from the Indians and approximately one-third of the positive samples from the IVDUs were of the HTLV-IIB subtype. Comparative analyses indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the various assays were: PCR, 98 and 100 percent; Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II, 78 and 95 percent; Cambridge Biotech HTLV-I/II, 76 and 96 percent; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, 71 and 98 percent; and WB, 73 and 100 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences among the sensitivities and specificities of the HTLV-I/II ELISAs (p values, 0.056-0.438). The WB and PCR assays were much more specific than the other serologic assays (p相似文献   

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I among blood donors from Guadeloupe: donation, demographic, and biologic characteristics

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data on human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) are scant. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From January 1989 to December 1996, 59,426 blood donors were screened by enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to HTLV-I. All repeatedly reactive samples were confirmed by Western blot. Temporal trends in HTLV-I seropositivity rates were examined during the study period. A multivariate analysis of donation, demographic, and biologic characteristics was performed. RESULTS: Of the screened blood donors, 195 were confirmed as seropositive, for an overall prevalence of 0.33 percent (95% CI 0.28-0.38). A marked decrease in overall HTLV-I prevalence with time (from 0.47% in 1989 to 0.13% in 1996) was observed, which can be explained mainly by the decreasing percentage of recruited new donors during the study period. Four independent risk factors for HTLV-I were identified: new donor status (odds ratio [OR] 12.5), female sex (OR 1.7), increasing age (30-39 years: OR, 2.4; 40-49 years: OR, 3.7; >50 years: OR 6.6), and positive antibodies to hepatitis B virus core antigen (OR, 1.7). Selection of specific locations for blood collection was inversely associated with HTLV-I (OR 0.5). CONCLUSION: New donor status, advancing age, female sex, and positivity for hepatitis B virus core antibodies were the major factors associated with HTLV-I infection in Guadeloupe.     

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I and type II infections and correlation with risk factors in blood donors from Sao Paulo, Brazil

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of and risk factors for human T-lymphotropic virus type I and type II (HTLV-I, HTLV-II) infections in Brazil. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 17,063 healthy Brazilian donors were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody to HTLV-I/II between August 1991 and July 1993. Repeatedly reactive samples were confirmed by Western blot, and discrimination between HTLV-I and HTLV-II was made by polymerase chain reaction or synthetic peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A univariate analysis was performed on demographic and serologic data. RESULTS: HTLV-I infection was demonstrated in 83 percent of the 30 donors with reactive serologic tests (0.15% of the total tested [17,063]; 95% CI, 0.09-0.20) and HTLV-II infection in 17 percent (0.03% of the total tested [17,063]; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05). HTLV-I-positive donors were more likely than reference groups to be of Asian ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 15.1; reference group: whites), more than 50 years old (OR 4.2; reference group: 20–29 years old), and positive for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) (OR 21.8) or to hepatitis B core (antigen) (anti-HBc) (OR 5.7). HTLV-II showed a significant association with anti-HCV (OR 75.2) and anti-HBc (OR 21.8). Eleven of the 25 HTLV-I- positive donors were counseled. Family origin in endemic areas of Japan (n = 4), prior blood transfusion (n = 3), or sexual contact with prostitutes (n = 1) were the risk factors reported by 8 donors. In 3 white men, no risk factors could be identified. CONCLUSION: Both HTLV-I and HTLV-II occur among Brazilian blood donors. HTLV-I is associated with Asian ethnicity, greater age, and the presence of anti-HCV and anti-HBc. Three HTLV-I-positive donors had a history of blood transfusion, which emphasizes the need for HTLV-I/II screening in Brazil.     

Sensitivity and specificity of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types I and II polymerase chain reaction and several serologic assays in screening a population with a high prevalence of HTLV-II

BACKGROUND: Since 1988, all blood donations in the United States have been screened for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I). However, the sensitivity of current serologic tests for the detection of HTLV type II (HTLV-II) antibodies and the diagnostic utility of direct tests for HTLV-I and -II using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are poorly defined.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-nine HTLV-I- or -II-seropositive and 687 age- and sex-matched seronegative samples from a high-risk population at an inner-city emergency department were selected. All samples were tested with four HTLV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), one Western blot assay and one type-specific Western blot assay, one HTLV type-specific EIA, and a research HTLV-I/II PCR kit.
RESULTS: Sensitivity of the various EIAs ranged from 95.1 to 99.5 percent, and specificity ranged from 97.2 to 99.4 percent. PCR performed in duplicate without selective retesting had lower sensitivity (85.1%) and specificity (88.0%). However, PCR detected 20 (3.2%) HTLV-I-positive and 47 (7.5%) HTLV-II-positive samples among the 627 samples that were negative in all EIAs. The type-specific EIA and PCR assay had the highest rate of concordance in classifying samples as either HTLV-I or -II, with the type-specific EIA and type-specific Western blot having the next highest rates of concordance.
CONCLUSION: In this sample set from a population at high risk for HTLV-II, screening with HTLV-I/II PCR had lower sensitivity and specificity than that with EIAs. However, 4.1 to 10.8 percent of samples were PCR positive but seronegative for HTLV-I or –II, and their true infection status remains undetermined.     

Sensitivity and specificity of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types I and II polymerase chain reaction and several serologic assays in screening a population with a high prevalence of HTLV-II

BACKGROUND: Since 1988, all blood donations in the United States have been screened for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I). However, the sensitivity of current serologic tests for the detection of HTLV type II (HTLV-II) antibodies and the diagnostic utility of direct tests for HTLV-I and -II using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are poorly defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-nine HTLV-I- or -II-seropositive and 687 age- and sex-matched seronegative samples from a high-risk population at an inner-city emergency department were selected. All samples were tested with four HTLV enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), one Western blot assay and one type-specific Western blot assay, one HTLV type-specific EIA, and a research HTLV-I/II PCR kit. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the various EIAs ranged from 95.1 to 99.5 percent, and specificity ranged from 97.2 to 99.4 percent. PCR performed in duplicate without selective retesting had lower sensitivity (85.1 %) and specificity (88.0%). However, PCR detected 20 (3.2%) HTLV-I-positive and 47 (7.5%) HTLV-II-positive samples among the 627 samples that were negative in all EIAs. The type-specific EIA and PCR assay had the highest rate of concordance in classifying samples as either HTLV-I or II, with the type-specific EIA and type-specific Western blot having the next highest rates of concordance. CONCLUSION: In this sample set from a population at high risk for HTLV-II, screening with HTLV-I/II PCR had lower sensitivity and specificity than that with EIAs. However, 4.1 to 10.8 percent of samples were PCR positive but seronegative for HTLV-I or -II, and their true infection status remains undetermined.     

Determinants of transfusion-associated bacterial contamination: results of the French Bacthem Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-associated bacterial contamination (TABC), probably the most frequent transfusion-transmitted infection, may induce serious adverse events. Systematic information and documentation on determinants are lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The BACTHEM Study is a French matched case-control study assessing TABC determinants. Included were cases of TABC reported in France in a 2-year period, as determined from uniform definitions. Information on recipient-, blood component-, and donor-related potential determinants was collected on site. ORs were estimated by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 158 cases of suspected TABC reported, 41 that involved transfusion with 25 RBCs and 16 platelet concentrates were included. Gram-negative rods accounted for nearly half of the bacteria species involved and for all six deaths. In comparison with the risk of TABC for patients receiving RBCs for anemia, the risk was higher for patients receiving RBCs for pancytopenia (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.3-41.0) and for those receiving platelets for thrombocytopenia (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.2-24.1). Other potential determinants were platelet transfusion for pancytopenia (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 0.5-40.0), immunosuppressive treatment (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.7-10.6), shelf-life of more than 1 day for platelets or 8 days for RBCs (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.7-9.6), and more than 20 previous donations by donors (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.7-5.3). CONCLUSION: This first comparative study revealed TABC determinants that suggest approaches for prevention.     

Serologic distinction between human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) type I and HTLV type II

In November 1988, the Food and Drug Administration approved reagents for serologic screening for human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) infection in blood donors and patients suspected of having HTLV-I-related illnesses. These reagents are able to detect HTLV type II (HTLV-II), a close relative of HTLV-I with no known pathologic effect. The distinction between the two forms of HTLV is important to the donor and to any recipient of blood containing HTLV. The application to sera from 38 seropositive blood donors and 2 recipients (37 "confirmed" positive and 3 indeterminate by Western blot) of two methods (Western blot and peptide enzyme immunoassay) for serologic distinction between HTLV-I and -II is described. These results were compared to those from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of HTLV proviral DNA obtained from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The peptide enzyme immunoassay was found to be less sensitive than the Western blot, but completely concordant with PCR results when differential reactivity could be established. The Western blot pattern showed complete diagnostic concordance with the samples with confirmed-positive serologic tests, but was incorrect in two HTLV-II-infected donors with indeterminate serologic tests. Thirty-three (89%) of the 37 individuals from this predominantly Native American and Hispanic group of blood donors were found to have HTLV-II. These findings confirm and extend previous reports that HTLV-I infection may be less common, and HTLV-II infection more common, than previously believed. The peptide enzyme immunoassay can provide most individuals who have positive results with the HTLV-I/II screening test with serologic distinction between HTLV-I and HTLV-II.     

Absence of human T-lymphotropic virus type I tax sequences in a population of normal blood donors in the Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC, area: results from a multicenter study

BACKGROUND: It was reported recently that sequences corresponding to the human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) tax gene were detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 8 to 11 percent of healthy blood donors without detectable antibodies to HTLV-I. A multicenter blind study was conducted to determine if these results could be independently confirmed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Specimens were collected from 100 anti-HTLV-I-negative healthy blood donors and from 11 anti-HTLV-I- or anti-HTLV-II-positive individuals. All samples were coded and distributed to each of four independent testing laboratories for polymerase chain reaction analysis to detect sequences of the HTLV-I or HTLV-II tax gene, using detailed procedures specified by the laboratory reporting the original observation. Each laboratory also tested a dilution panel of a plasmid containing HTLV-I tax to determine the analytical sensitivity of the procedure. RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity of the screening methods permitted detection of as few as 1 to 10 copies of the tax gene. However, HTLV-I tax sequences could not be detected in any of the anti-HTLV-I-negative blood donors at more than one test site. CONCLUSION: HTLV-I tax sequences appear not to be present in this population of 100 blood donors negative for anti-HTLV-I.     

Comparative evaluation of 14 immunoassays for detection of antibodies to the human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II using panels of sera from Sweden and West Africa

BACKGROUND: A new generation of assays for the detection of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I/II) antibodies has been released. These assays incorporate HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some are based on new assay principles. Comparative evaluation data that include these new as well as previous assays are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen HTLV antibody assays were evaluated by using well-characterized panels of sera from Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, and Sweden. The sera included 127 HTLV-I-positive and 62 HTLV-II-positive specimens, as well as 919 consecutive negative samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was 100 percent for all assays, except one, which repeatedly missed one sample. The sensitivity for HTLV-II varied between 86 percent and 100 percent. In general, new-generation assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some of which are based on new assay principles, had a higher sensitivity for HTLV-II than previous assays, which mainly are based on HTLV-I antigens. The specificity was generally higher for new assays than for the previous versions. Testing of Swedish blood donor sera gave higher specificities (94-100%) than did that of African specimens (90-99.7%). Most assays had low delta values (DVs), although there was a tendency toward increased DVs for the new generation of assays. Only two of the new generation of assays came close to a combination of high sensitivity for both HTLV-I and HTLV-II, high specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and high DVs. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was generally high and appears to have improved for HTLV-II with the introduction of a new generation of assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens. However, some assays still give false-negative results on HTLV-II-positive specimens. The specificities and the DVs were generally higher for the new assays than for the previous versions.     

GB virus type C/HGV markers in HCV RNA-positive French blood donors: correlation with HCV genotypes and risk factors

BACKGROUND: Exposure to GB virus type C/HGV (GBV-C/HGV) could be determined by detection either of RNA by RT-PCR or of antibodies of the envelope protein E2. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of the GBV-C/HGV markers of infection in a blood donor population infected with HCV and to identify GBV-C/HGV routes of transmission that are associated with HCV genotypes and risk factors. RESULTS: Among 306 HCV RNA-positive blood donors, the proportion of GBV-C/HGV RNA-positive donors and anti-E2-positive donors was 19.3 percent (95% CI = 15.0-24.2%) and 42.1 percent (95% CI = 36.6-47.9%), respectively. Exposure to GBV-C/HGV (RNA or anti-E2) was significantly associated with the risk factor of IV drug use. There was a trend toward association with HCV subtypes 1a and 3a, probably because these HCV subtypes are the most frequent in IV drug users. No correlation was observed between ALT elevation and the presence of GBV-C/HGV RNA. CONCLUSION: In persons with HCV infection, IV drug use seems to be a major route of GBV-C/HGV transmission. Precautions taken to avoid HCV infection will probably also decrease GBV-C/HGV transmission.     

Transfusion transmission of retroviruses: human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II compared with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

BACKGROUND: The incidence of transfusion transmission of human T- lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and HTLV type II (HTLV-II) has not been compared directly or to that of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The effects of refrigerator storage of the blood component on infectivity of the viruses needs definition. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The circumstances influencing the transmission of HTLV-I, HTLV- II, and HIV-1 via blood of donors whose sera were stored in a repository and who were retrospectively documented as having been infected at blood donation were examined. Confirmation and typing of anti-HTLV positivity in donors and recipients used polymerase chain reaction, supplemented by specific peptide testing. RESULTS: Overall, 27 percent (26/95) of the recipients of blood components from anti-HTLV- I- and -II-positive donors became infected (9 with HTLV-I and 17 with HTLV-II). No recipients of acellular blood components became infected with HTLV-I or -II. There was no probable transmission by components stored > 10 days. The rates of transmission for both viruses were similar: 0 to 5 days' storage, 17 (74%) of 23; 6 to 10 days, 8 (44%) of 18; and 11 to 14, 0 (0%) of 10 (trend, p = 0.0002). In comparison, 89 percent (112/126) of the recipients of anti-HIV-1-positive blood were infected regardless of component type, and no effect on transmission occurred with storage for < 26 days. CONCLUSION: Transfusion- transmitted HTLV-I and -II are similar. The data suggest that a donor's lymphocytes become noninfectious when they lose the ability to be activated or to proliferate.     

Low incidence of HTLV infections in random blood donors with indeterminate western blot patterns

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were recovered from platelet units of 61 blood donors who were HTLV-I positive and 3 blood donors who were HTLV-I negative on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Western blot analyses were performed on the sera and DNA was prepared from the PBMCs and analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of the 61 repeatably reactive samples, 2 were positive, 26 were negative, and 33 were interpreted as indeterminate on Western blot. HTLV-II sequences were detected by PCR in one of the Western blot-positive samples, as well as in one Western blot-indeterminate sample that showed reactivity to p24 only. HTLV-I sequences were detected in the second Western blot-positive sample. HTLV sequences were not detected in the remaining samples, which suggested that the majority of individuals with indeterminate results on Western blots that used one set of commercially available reagents are not infected with HTLV. It is demonstrated in this study that PCR can be used not only to resolve the infection status of individuals with indeterminate Western blots but also to distinguish between HTLV-I and HTLV-II.     

False-negative testing errors in routine viral marker screening of blood donors. For the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: The contribution of testing errors to the risk of virus transmission by transfusion depends on the rate of false-negative testing errors and the prevalence of infected seropositive donations. Although the false-negative testing error rate has been estimated at 0.1 to 1 percent on the basis of proficiency studies, it has not previously been measured in routine donor screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 1991 to 1995 database containing 5,153,153 donations from 1.5 x 10(6) donors (including autologous donors) was searched to identify donors who tested seropositive for HIV, HCV, HTLV-I or II and who attempted subsequent donations. The false-negative rate in routinely screened follow-up donations was determined, and false-negative cases were investigated to identify the cause. RESULTS: Subsequent donations (n = 2015) by 1224 donors with confirmed-positive results were identified. Eleven (0.5%) of these donations did not react in EIA. Ten of the 11 false-negative cases were attributable to borderline-reactive donations. On subsequent donations, there were borderline-nonreactive results on HTLV-I (2 cases), first-generation HCV (5 cases), and second-generation HCV (3 cases) EIAs. The final case was strongly reactive for HCV in a second-generation EIA on two donations (signal-to-cutoff [S:C] ratio >3.5), followed by a baseline nonreactive result on a third donation (S:C = 0.05). CONCLUSION: False-negative testing results occur infrequently during routine infectious-disease donor screening. Although most false-negative results occurred with borderline-reactive HTLV-II samples and/or early-generation HCV EIAs, frank technical errors (e.g., sample mixup or failure to add sample to EIA well) also occur at a low rate (0.05%; 95% CI, 0-1.5%). Process enhancements designed to reduce errors (e.g., enhanced automation of data management and testing systems and process controls for EIAs) are warranted to detect and prevent false-negative results.     

Transfusion-associated transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II: experience of a regional blood center

During a 22-month period, 78,000 blood donors were screened for human T- lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I/II) at Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Center (Denver, Colorado). Positive donors and the living recipients of their previously donated blood components were evaluated for risk factors and symptoms related to HTLV-I infection, were screened by enzyme immunoassay, confirmed by Western blot for HTLV- I/II, and subsequently tested by polymerase chain reaction and peptide enzyme immunoassay to distinguish between HTLV-I and -II infection. Six seropositive blood donors (0.008%) were identified; four were typed as having HTLV-I infection and two as having HTLV-II. Of 18 living recipients of components from seropositive donors, none had risk factors for HTLV-I infection prior to transfusion and none had signs or symptoms of HTLV-I infection at follow-up. The mean time from transfusion to testing was 6.4 years. Seven recipients of HTLV-I- infected components were HTLV seropositive; all were typed as having HTLV-I. A possible case of posttransfusion HTLV-I-associated myelopathy was identified in one patient who died before complete evaluation. One possible case of transfusion-associated HTLV-II was identified. These data further support the continued screening of blood donors for HTLV- I/II.     

Transfusion of buffy coat-depleted blood components and risk of postoperative infection in orthopedic patients

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic blood transfusions have been reported to increase susceptibility to postoperative infection, but the findings were inconclusive. This study was designed to investigate the effect of buffy coat-depleted allogeneic and autologous transfusion on postoperative infection in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 385) undergoing elective orthopedic surgery (primary and revision joint replacement, spinal, or pelvic surgery) were included in a prospective observational study of the incidence of postoperative infection between April and December 1996. Infection rates in patients who received allogeneic buffy coat-depleted blood transfusions were compared with those in patients who received no transfusion or only autologous (buffy coat-depleted) blood. RESULTS: Patients without exposure to allogeneic blood (no blood or only autologous blood) had an infection rate of 3.9 percent, as compared to a rate of 12.2 percent for those with exposure to allogeneic blood (allogeneic blood, autologous plus allogeneic blood) (odds ratio 3.442; 95% CI, 1.349-10.40; p = 0.006). Of the 385 study patients, 309 underwent primary hip or knee replacement surgery. In this homogeneous subgroup, the postoperative infection rate was 4.6 percent after no transfusion or autologous transfusion and 11.9 percent after allogeneic transfusion (odds ratio 2.827; 95% CI 1.059-8.799; p = 0.036). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed buffy coat-depleted allogeneic blood transfusion as an independent variable associated with high risk for postoperative infection. CONCLUSION: Buffy coat-depleted allogeneic blood transfusion increases the incidence of postoperative infection in patients undergoing uncontaminated orthopedic surgery.     

Evaluation of a new third-generation ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay for blood screening and diagnosis

In comparison to current on-market assays, the ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay is the first fully automated assay that simultaneously detects human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) in human serum and plasma. Specificity was assessed on 5646 blood donors and 692 clinical specimens. For sensitivity determination, 301 HTLV-I–positive and 105 HTLV-II–positive specimens were tested. Precision was between 3.98% and 4.31% coefficient of variation (CV) for specimens with 1 to 6 sample to cutoff. Specificity was 99.95% and 99.86% on specimens from blood donors and hospitalized patients, respectively. Sensitivity evaluation showed 100% detection on 301 HTLV-I and 105 HTLV-II specimens. HTLV-I and HTLV-II viruses are still circulating among general populations even in the low prevalence areas. To control the further spread of these retroviruses, we need to know that it is important to continue screening of blood. The performance evaluation data from this study demonstrate that the high throughput and fully automated ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II chemiluminescence immunoassay effectively serves this purpose.     

Transfusion transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II: serologic and polymerase chain reaction results in recipients identified through look-back investigations

To determine the transmissibility of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) via transfusion, persons who, from 1983 to 1989, received blood components donated by persons who subsequently tested anti-HTLV-I-positive were evaluated. It was found that 16 (30%) of 54 evaluable recipients of transfused cellular components became infected with one of the HTLVs: 8 had HTLV-I and 8 had HTLV-II. Forty percent of platelet recipients and 28 percent of red cell recipients acquired infection. The rate of transmission of HTLV-I and HTLV-II was significantly correlated with storage age of red cell units prior to transfusion: 47 percent for red cells stored < or = 14 days and 0 for red cells stored > 14 days (p < 0.01). Multiple confirmatory serologic tests performed in 46 anti-HTLV-I enzyme immunoassay-negative recipients revealed that HTLV infection could not be excluded in 3 recipients of blood components from HTLV-II-infected donors. Polymerase chain reaction established HTLV-II infection in one recipient, and the other two recipients could not be classified with respect to HTLV infection status. It appears that some HTLV-II-infected transfusion recipients will not be detected by existing HTLV-I antigen-based reagents. If it is deemed necessary to initiate or continue look-back programs to detect transfusion transmission of HTLV-II infection, it is suggested that the current testing algorithm be modified in selected cases.     

Comparative performances of enzyme-linked immunosorbent, western blot, and polymerase chain reaction assays for human T-lymphotropic virus type II infection that is endemic among Indians of the Gran Chaco region of South America

BACKGROUND : Human T-cell lymphoma/leukemia viruses types I and II (HTLV- I and HTLV-II) are related exogenous human retroviruses. The former is definitely pathogenic while disease association with the latter is unclear. There are two subtypes of HTLV-II, A and B. Currently, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on HTLV-I antigens are used to screen for the presence of HTLV-I and -II antibodies. Confirmation and subtyping are accomplished by Western blot (WB) or ELISAs based on HTLV-I whole viral antigens and/or HTLV-I and HTLV-IIA peptides. The sensitivity and specificity of these serologic assays were compared to those of HTLV-I and-II-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in tests on samples from Indians from South America in whom the HTLV- IIB subtype is endemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Sera from 246 Gran Chaco Indians were evaluated for HTLV antibodies with the use of four ELISAs (Retrotek HTLV-I; Cambridge Biotech rgp21 enhanced HTLV-I/II; Vironostika HTLV-I/II; and Select HTLV-I/II), and a WB assay. Peripheral blood leukocyte DNA from each Indian was analyzed for HTLV-I or HTLV-II pol DNA via PCR. Fifteen of the PCR-positive samples were further subtyped via cloning and sequencing and/or oligomer restriction. RESULTS : Ninety-seven samples (39%) were positive for HTLV- II by serologic and/or PCR assays. All 15 positive DNA samples that were further analyzed were of the HTLV-IIB subtype and were clustered as a highly conserved phylogenetic group. Comparative analyses indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the various assays were: PCR, 97 and 100 percent; Retrotek, 70 and 91 percent; Cambridge Biotech, 74 and 96 percent; Vironostika, 73 and 99 percent; Select 72 and 98 percent; and WB, 70 and 100 percent. CONCLUSION : The sensitivities of the tested HTLV serologic assays were comparable. However, the specificity of the Retrotek ELISA was significantly lower than that of the others. When positive, the subtyping assays were very specific. However, PCR assays would seem preferable or to be a necessary adjunct for the sensitive detection of HTLV-IIB infection.     

Absence of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II infection in an Ontario hemophilia population

Two hundred ninety-three serum samples from Ontario hemophiliacs and 200 samples from human immunodeficiency virus-positive blood donors were screened for the presence of antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, and Western blot techniques. None of the serum samples provided unequivocal positive results, but several samples gave inconclusive results. Of the hemophiliacs with inconclusive serologic results from whom peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA could be obtained, all were negative for HTLV-I and HTLV type II (HTLV-II) sequences as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR was also performed on a lymph node biopsy sample taken from a hemophiliac who developed a rare T-cell lymphoma; the sample was negative for HTLV-I and -II sequences. These results indicate that Ontario hemophiliacs have not been exposed to HTLV-I or HTLV-II.     

Profile of blood donors with serologic tests reactive for the presence of syphilis in São Paulo, Brazil

BACKGROUND: Syphilis screening of blood donors is a common practice worldwide, but very little is known about the meaning of a positive serologic test for syphilis in blood donors and the risk profile of these donors. The aim of this study was to determine the demographic characteristics and risk behaviors of blood donors with recent and past syphilis and their implications for blood bank testing and deferral strategies.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Demographic characteristics, category of donation, number of previous donations, sexual behavior, and history of sexually transmitted diseases were reviewed comparing blood donors with recent and past syphilis from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2003.
RESULTS: A total of 2439 interviews were reviewed, including 2161 (88.6%) donors with past and 278 (11.4%) with recent syphilis infection. Factors associated with recent infection included younger age (≤20 years odds ratio [OR], 36.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.8-84.1), two previous donations (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.9), male-male sex (homosexual OR, 8.2; 95% CI, 3.2-20.8; and bisexual OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 3.6-36.3), two or more partners in the past 12 months (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.0), symptoms for syphilis (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.8-7.1), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity (OR, 39.6; 95% CI, 4.6-339.8). Community donors were also associated with recent syphilis infection (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) compared to replacement donors.
CONCLUSION: Sexual history, including male-male sex and multiple partners, were strongly associated with recent syphilis infection, which in turn was strongly associated with HIV. Continuous and vigilant surveillance that includes assessing sexual history and other factors associated with syphilis are needed to guide blood safety policies.