Operative stabilization of posterior shoulder instability

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic, traumatic posterior shoulder instability is often the result of a posteriorly directed blow to an adducted, internally rotated, and forward-flexed upper extremity. Operative repair has been shown to provide favorable results. Current arthroscopic techniques with suture anchors and the ability to plicate the capsule using a nonabsorbable suture may provide favorable outcomes with reduced morbidity. PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of operative shoulder stabilization in patients with traumatic posterior shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent arthroscopic or open posterior stabilization for traumatic posterior shoulder instability were evaluated using subjective assessments, physical examinations, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Rowe score, Simple Shoulder Test, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index.Results: Between May 1996 and February 2002, 31 shoulders (30 patients) underwent posterior stabilization (19 arthroscopically, 12 open). There were 29 men and 1 woman (mean age, 23 years). Preoperatively, all patients had a distinct traumatic cause for the instability. On physical examination, all patients had posterior apprehension and increased (2+, 3+) posterior load-shift testing. Preoperative radiographs and/or magnetic resonance imaging revealed posterior rim calcification or reverse Bankart lesions in 29 cases (94%). At arthroscopy, posterior labral injuries, reverse Bankart lesions, or humeral head defects were identified. Follow-up averaged 40 months, and the mean duration between injury and surgery was 21 months. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Rowe score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores, respectively, for the entire group were 89, 87, 11, and 346; for the open group, they were 81, 80, 10.5, and 594; for the arthroscopic group, they were 92, 92, 11.4, and 190. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (P < .03) and Rowe score (P < .04) outcomes scores for the arthroscopic group were statistically better than those of the open group. Twenty-nine of 31 shoulders were rated as excellent or good. CONCLUSION: In the case of traumatic posterior shoulder subluxation, posterior lesions of the labrum ("reverse Bankart"), articular edge, and capsule are observed. Surgical treatment addressing these lesions led to satisfactory results for both the open and arthroscopic treated groups. In this study, an arthroscopic technique utilizing suture anchor repair with capsular placation provided the most favorable outcomes.     

Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery

The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and the Rowe and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Between April 1993 and December 1996, 209 follow-up examinations were performed on 163 United States Military Academy cadets after shoulder surgery. These 209 examinations were divided into five follow-up categories: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and greater than 2 years. The Rowe and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from each subject's follow-up questionnaire were correlated with his or her Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation rating, which is determined by the subject's written response to the following question: "How would you rate your shoulder today as a percentage of normal (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal)?" Correlation coefficients between the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and the two scores were 0.51 to 0.79 for the Rowe score and 0.46 to 0.69 for the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons score. The results of this study indicate that the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation correlates well with these two scores after shoulder surgery. This study suggests that this new evaluation method provides clinicians with a mechanism to gather outcomes data with little demand on their time and resources.     

Arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability: results in 33 patients

BACKGROUND: Posterior shoulder instability is a relatively rare condition and a surgical challenge. Arthroscopic techniques have allowed for a potential improvement as well as diagnosis and management of this condition. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization and to evaluate preoperative and intraoperative variables as predictors of success. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with a mean age of 25 years (range, 19-34 years) who underwent posterior arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with suture anchors (mean, 3 anchors) or suture capsulolabral plication (mean, 5.3 stitches) or both were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 39.1 months (range, 22-60 months). Shoulder outcomes rating scores were determined using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Rating Scale, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, the Subjective Patient Shoulder Evaluation, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. RESULTS: There were 7 failures: 4 for recurrent instability and 3 for symptoms of pain. Overall, outcomes scores demonstrated mean values of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Rating Scale of 94.6, Subjective Patient Shoulder Evaluation of 20.0, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of 389.4 (81.5% of normal), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation of 87.5. Patients with voluntary instability demonstrated worse outcomes (P = .025), and those with prior surgery of the shoulder also did worse (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability is an effective means to improve symptoms associated with recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder. It can provide predictable success in the setting of unidirectional, nonvoluntary posterior instability without prior surgery.     

Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an inverted pear glenoid: results in patients with bone loss of the anterior glenoid

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has demonstrated that the success rates of arthroscopic stabilization of glenohumeral instability deteriorate in patients with an anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency, also known as the "inverted pear" glenoid. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a mean anteroinferior glenoid bone deficiency of 25% (range, 20%-30%). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-one of 23 patients (91% follow-up) undergoing arthroscopic stabilization surgery and noted to have a bony deficiency of the anteroinferior glenoid of 20% to 30% were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 26-47). The mean age was 25 years (range, 20-34); 2 patients were female and 19 were male. All patients were treated with a primary anterior arthroscopic stabilization using a mean of 3.2 suture anchors (range, 3-4). Eleven patients had a bony Bankart that was incorporated into the repair; 10 had no bone fragment and were considered attritional bone loss. Outcomes were assessed using the Rowe score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index. Findings of recurrent instability and dislocation events were documented. RESULTS: Two patients (9.5%) experienced symptoms of recurrent subluxation, and 1 (4.8%) sustained a recurrent dislocation that required revision open surgery. The mean postoperative outcomes scores were as follows: SANE = 88.1 (range, 65-100; standard deviation [SD] 9.0); Rowe = 85.2 (range, 55-100; SD 14.1); ASES Score = 93.1 (range, 78-100; SD 5.3); and WOSI Index = 398 (82% of normal; range, 30-1175; SD 264). No patient with a bony fragment experienced a recurrent subluxation or dislocation, and mean outcomes scores for patients with a bony fragment were better than those with no bony fragment (P = .08). No patient required medical discharge from the military for his or her shoulder condition. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability, even in the presence of a significant bony defect of the glenoid, can yield a stable shoulder; however, outcomes are not as predictable especially in attritional bone loss cases. Longer-term follow-up is needed to see if these results hold up over time.     

Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization for recurrent anterior instability: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability has been reported to result in a higher rate of recurrent instability compared to traditional open techniques. PURPOSE: To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability treated with open or arthroscopic stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A consecutive series of 64 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were randomized to receive either arthroscopic or open stabilization by a single surgeon. Magnetic resonance arthrogram studies were obtained preoperatively. These findings were compared to arthroscopic findings. Postoperative evaluations included range of motion, stability, and subjective assessments including Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, Western Ontario Instability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles evaluation. Failure was defined as a second dislocation, recurrent subluxation, or symptoms precluding return to previous work or unrestricted active military duty. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients, 29 who received open stabilization and 32 who received arthroscopic stabilization, were evaluated at a mean of 32 months postoperatively (range, 24-48 months). Patient demographics were equivalent. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram findings were confirmed at arthroscopic examination. The mean operative time was significantly shorter for the arthroscopic repairs (59 vs 149 minutes; P < .001). There were 3 clinical failures (2 open stabilizations, 1 arthroscopic stabilization) by the established criteria. There was a statistically significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores in both groups (P < .001). The mean loss of motion (compared to the contralateral shoulder) was greater in the open shoulders. Subjective evaluations were equal in both groups. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic and open stabilization were comparable. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms in shoulders with anterior instability allow an accurate diagnosis of intra-articular abnormality that correlates well with operative findings. Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent anterior shoulder instability can be performed safely; the clinical outcomes are comparable to those after traditional open stabilization.     

Torg氏改良的Bristow术式治疗肩关节复发性前脱位

目的:探讨Torg氏改良的Bristow术式治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的方法及疗效。方法:2002年~2006年间于本院行Torg氏改良的Bristow术式治疗复发性肩关节前脱位患者25例,所有病例依据病史、典型的恐惧试验以及至少一次的肩关节前脱位X线片检查得以明确诊断。肩关节前方切口,行喙突-肱二头肌短头、喙肱肌联合腱截骨后,由肩胛下肌上缘下压肩胛下肌,采用钛质空心钉固定肩胛盂颈部中下1/3处。结果:所有病例通过肩关节镜探查,均有典型的Bankart损伤和Hillsach损伤;随访1~5年,再脱位1例,患者主观满意度良好,肩关节不稳定恐惧感均明显改善。rowe评分:优18例(72%)、良6例(24%)、一般1例(4%)、差0例。结论:采用Torg氏改良的Bristow术式治疗肩关节复发性前脱位复发率低,患者满意度高。     

Revisiting the open Bankart experience: a four- to nine-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The open Bankart technique for posttraumatic recurrent anterior instability has become the procedure of choice for patients who do not respond to nonoperative treatment. HYPOTHESIS: The open Bankart procedure renders stable and well-functioning shoulders in the long term in a large proportion of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective follow-up study with independent reexaminers. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (54 shoulders) with symptomatic, posttraumatic, recurrent anterior shoulder instability underwent an open Bankart reconstruction procedure with suture anchors. All of the patients had a Bankart lesion. Forty-seven patients (87%) were reexamined by independent observers at a mean follow-up period of 69 months (range, 48 to 114). RESULTS: The recurrence rate, including both dislocations and subluxations, was 17% (8 of 47). The median Rowe score was 90 points (range, 24 to 100) at the follow-up, and the median Constant score was 88.5 points (range, 41 to 100). External rotation in abduction was a median of 90 degrees (range, 25 degrees to 125 degrees ) in the involved shoulders, as compared with 97.5 degrees (80 degrees to 125 degrees ) in the noninjured shoulders (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in the long term, the open Bankart procedure resulted in an unexpectedly high number of patients with failure in terms of stability. These results emphasize the importance of performing long-term follow-up studies after surgical reconstruction for unidirectional, posttraumatic, anterior shoulder instability using any type of technique.     

Prospective evaluation of thermal capsulorrhaphy for shoulder instability: indications and results, two- to five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Thermal shrinkage of capsular tissue has recently been proposed as a means to address the capsular redundancy associated with shoulder instability. Although this procedure has become very popular, minimal peer-reviewed literature is available to justify its widespread use. PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic electrothermal capsulorrhaphy for the treatment of shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: This nonrandomized prospective study evaluated the indications and results of thermal capsulorrhaphy in 84 shoulders with an average follow-up of 38 months. METHODS: Patients were divided into three clinical subgroups: traumatic anterior dislocation (acute or recurrent), recurrent anterior anterior/inferior subluxation without prior dislocation, and multidirectional instability. Patients underwent arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy after initial assessment, radiographs, and failure of a minimum of 3 months of nonoperative rehabilitation. RESULTS: Outcome measures included pain, recurrent instability, return to work/sports, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Assessment score. Overall results were excellent in 33 participants (39%), satisfactory in 20 (24%), and unsatisfactory in 31 (37%). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of unsatisfactory overall results (37%), documented with longer follow-up, is of great concern. The authors conclude that enthusiasm for thermal capsulorrhaphy should be tempered until further studies document its efficacy.     

Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with a bioabsorbable tack

BACKGROUND: Short-term to midterm data are available on arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using bioabsorbable tacks or suture anchors. It remains unknown whether these techniques can equal the success of open Bankart repair in the long term. PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Treatment outcomes were determined prospectively according to the Rowe score and retrospectively according to the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Included in this study were 18 consecutive patients with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 16-62 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The study group consisted of 14 male and 4 female patients. The mean follow-up was 8.7 years (range, 7.0-9.8 years). RESULTS: One patient had recurrent dislocations requiring further surgery, for an overall failure rate of 5.6%. An additional patient had 1 traumatic subluxation episode within the first postoperative year that did not recur. According to the Rowe score, which increased to 90.3 (17.8) from 32.8 (8.3) points preoperatively, 15 patients (83.3%) achieved a good or excellent result. The mean Constant score was 91.3 (SD, 6.9) points, and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 92.1 (SD, 6.9) points postoperatively. A return to the preinjury level of sports competition was reported by 64% of patients. No signs of synovitis occurred in any patient postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability repair using bioabsorbable tacks offers reliable results with respect to failure rate, range of motion, and shoulder function during a minimum follow-up of 7.0 years. In contrast to previous reports on arthroscopic Bankart repair, results did not deteriorate during follow-up.     

Arthroscopic laser-assisted capsular shift in the treatment of patients with multidirectional shoulder instability

BACKGROUND: In recent years, various investigators have begun using lasers in the treatment of shoulder instability. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic laser-assisted capsular shift is an effective treatment for patients with multidirectional shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 28 patients (30 shoulders) with multidirectional shoulder instability who were unresponsive to nonoperative management and who had undergone the laser-assisted capsular shift procedure. Twenty-five patients (27 shoulders) with an average follow-up of 28 months were available for review. All patients underwent a physical examination and completed a general questionnaire; the University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder rating scale; the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index; and the Short-Form 36 quality of life index. RESULTS: In 22 shoulders, results of the procedure were considered a success because the patients had no recurrent symptoms and at latest follow-up had required no further operative intervention. In five shoulders, results were considered a failure because of recurrent pain or instability and the need for an open capsular shift procedure. With recurrent instability as a measure of failure, the overall success rate was 81.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results with laser-assisted capsular shift are comparable with the results of other open and arthroscopic techniques in relieving pain and returning athletes to their premorbid function.     

Structural integrity and clinical function of the subscapularis musculotendinous unit after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization

BACKGROUND: Postoperative subscapularis dysfunction after open shoulder stabilization has recently received increasing attention. The potential advantage of arthroscopic stabilization procedures is that they do not violate the subscapularis musculotendinous unit, which might preserve its structural integrity and clinical function, which would lead to superior clinical results. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization does not lead to clinical and radiological signs of subscapularis insufficiency. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-two patients who underwent arthroscopic (group I, n = 12; average age, 30.9 years; mean follow-up, 37 months) or open (group II, n = 10; average age, 28.8 years; mean follow-up, 35.9 months) shoulder stabilization procedure were followed up clinically (clinical subscapularis tests and signs, Constant Score, Rowe Score, Walch-Duplay Score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score) and by magnetic resonance imaging (subscapularis tendon integrity, cross-sectional area, defined muscle diameters, and signal intensity analysis [ratio infraspinatus/upper subscapularis and infraspinatus/lower subscapularis]). A third group (group 0) of 12 healthy volunteers served as a control. RESULTS: Clinical signs for subscapularis insufficiency were present in 0% of cases in group I and in 70% of cases in group II. There were no statistically significant differences in either group regarding Constant Score, Rowe Score, Walch-Duplay Score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (P > .05). On magnetic resonance image, no subscapularis tendon ruptures were found. The cross-sectional area, the mean vertical diameter, and the mean transverse diameter of the upper and lower subscapularis muscle portion was significantly less in group II than in group 0 (P < .05). The signal intensity analysis revealed the infraspinatus/upper subscapularis ratio was significantly lower in group II than in group I or group 0. The infraspinatus/lower subscapularis ratio did not significantly differ in all 3 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms previous observations that open shoulder stabilization using a subscapularis tenotomy may lead to atrophy and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle, resulting in postoperative subscapularis dysfunction. As expected, arthroscopic procedures do not significantly compromise clinical subscapularis function and structural integrity. However, no significant differences were observed in the overall outcome.     

A modified capsular shift for atraumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of a modified inferior capsular shift procedure in patients with atraumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability by analyzing a consecutive series of patients who had undergone a modified inferior capsular shift for this specific type of shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1997, 38 shoulders of 35 patients with atraumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability that were unresponsive to nonoperative management were operated on using a modified capsular shift procedure with longitudinal incision of the capsule medially and a bony fixation of the inferior flap to the glenoid and labrum in the 1 o'clock to 3 o'clock position. The patient study group consisted of 9 men and 26 women with a mean age of 25.4 years (range, 15-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 7.4 years (range, 4.0-11.4 years); 1 patient was lost to follow-up directly after surgery. The study group was evaluated according to the Rowe score. RESULTS: After 7.4 years, 2 patients experienced a single redislocation or resubluxation, 1 patient had recurrent dislocations, and 1 patient had a positive apprehension sign, which is an overall redislocation rate of 10.5%. The average Rowe score increased to 90.6 (SD = 19.7) points from 36.2 (SD = 13.5) points before surgery. Seventy-two percent of the patients participating in sports returned to their preoperative level of competition. CONCLUSIONS: Results in this series demonstrate the efficacy and durability of a modified capsular shift procedure for the treatment of atraumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability.     

Anatomical glenoid reconstruction for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using an autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability associated with severe glenoid bone loss is rare, and little has been reported on this problem. Recent biomechanical and anatomical studies have suggested guidelines for bony reconstruction of the glenoid. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomical glenoid reconstruction will restore stability in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability owing to glenoid bone loss. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Eleven cases of traumatic recurrent anterior instability that required bony reconstruction for severe anterior glenoid bone loss were reviewed. In all cases, the length of the anterior glenoid defect exceeded the maximum anteroposterior radius of the glenoid based on preoperative assessment by 3-dimensional CT scan. Surgical reconstruction was performed using an intra-articular tricortical iliac crest bone graft contoured to reestablish the concavity and width of the glenoid. The graft was fixed with cannulated screws in combination with an anterior-inferior capsular repair. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 33 months, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 94, compared with a preoperative score of 65. The University of California, Los Angeles score improved to 33 from 18. The Rowe score improved to 94 from a preoperative score of 28. The mean motion loss compared with the contralateral, normal shoulder was 7 degrees of flexion, 14 degrees of external rotation in abduction, and one spinous process level for internal rotation. All patients returned to preinjury levels of sport, and only 2 complained of mild pain with overhead sports activities. No patients reported any recurrent instability (dislocation or subluxation). The CT scans with 3-dimensional reconstructions obtained 4 to 6 months postoperatively demonstrated union of the bone graft with incorporation along the anterior glenoid rim and preservation of joint space. CONCLUSION: Anatomical reconstruction of the glenoid with autogenous iliac crest bone graft for recurrent glenohumeral instability in the setting of bone deficiency is an effective form of treatment for this problem.     

Bioabsorbable tacks for arthroscopic treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation

Seventy-eight patients (82 shoulders) with symptomatic, recurrent anterior post-traumatic shoulder instability and Bankart lesions were operated on with bioabsorbable tacks (Suretac® fixators). All the patients were followed by an independent observer, with a median follow-up period of 27 (21–63) months. The recurrence rate was 8/82 (10%). The median Rowe score was 93 (37–100) points. The median Constant score for the index shoulders was 90 (34–100) points, compared with 93 (80–100) points for 59 non-operated healthy shoulders from the same cohort ( P =0.03). The external rotation in abduction was 93 (50–135)° compared with 105 (75–145)° for the control shoulders ( P =0.0018). Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using bioabsorbable Suretac® fixators appears to produce reliable results if used in patients with post-traumatic shoulder instability and a Bankart lesion.     

Laser capsulorrhaphy for multidirectional instability of the shoulder. An outcomes study and proposed classification system

BACKGROUND: Clinical data on the efficacy of laser capsulorrhaphy for the treatment of multidirectional instability of the shoulder are limited. HYPOTHESIS: The diagnosis of multidirectional instability includes a spectrum of pathologic symptoms that warrants subclassification; laser capsulorrhaphy alone is not uniformly effective for all subtypes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Twenty-five shoulders in 21 patients were treated with laser capsulorrhaphy for multidirectional instability. Functional outcomes at a mean duration of 32 months' follow-up (range, 24 to 48 months) were recorded. RESULTS: Instability recurred in 60% of patients with congenital multidirectional instability, 17% of patients with acquired multidirectional instability, and 33% of patients with posttraumatic multidirectional instability (overall recurrence rate, 40%). Generalized ligamentous laxity was a risk factor for recurrence. Patient satisfaction rates were 40%, 83%, and 22% for the congenital, acquired, and posttraumatic subgroups. Reasons for dissatisfaction included recurrent instability, persistent pain, and inability to return to athletic activity at desired capacity. The overall mean postoperative Simple Shoulder Test score was 84%. The mean postoperative numeric rating score for pain was 3.3 (10-point scale). CONCLUSIONS: Laser capsulorrhaphy may be effective for patients with acquired multidirectional instability secondary to repetitive microtrauma but is less predictable in the other subgroups.     

关节镜下盂唇修补合并改良Remplissage术治疗伴Hill-Sachs损伤肩关节前方不稳的临床对照研究

目的:研究盂唇修补合并改良Remplissage手术治疗伴肱骨头中小型Hill-Sachs骨性缺损的创伤性复发性肩关节前方不稳的疗效。方法:选取2006年至2010年经影像学检查确诊为伴肱骨头中小型Hill-Sachs损伤的创伤性复发性肩关节前方不稳患者共42例行回顾性随访研究。所有患者均由同一名医生施行关节镜下前方稳定术。根据是否加用改良Remplissage术式分为A、B两组。A组26例,在2006年至2009年行关节镜下单纯盂唇修补术。B组16例,在2009年至2010年行关节镜下盂唇修补术加改良Remplissage术,采用双线锚钉将后方关节囊(非冈下肌腱)填充于肱骨头缺损处。两组患者术后采用相同方法进行康复训练。采用牛津肩关节不稳评分(OSIS)和ROWE评分进行疗效评估、对比术前和术后3个月、6个月、9个月及12个月时肩关节活动度。结果:所有患者均获得随访,A组随访平均(28.0±5.6)个月(20～38个月);术前、术后OSIS评分分别为(37.0±4.2)分(27～43分)和(18.0±3.3)分(12～25分),ROWE评分分别为(20.2±12.2)分(5～40分)和(83.8±7.3)分(70～95分);术后再脱位患者1例,由再次创伤造成,半脱位患者5例。B组随访平均(19.6±3.8)个月(14～27个月);术前、术后OSIS评分分别为(37.9±4.9)分(29～44分)和(13.4±2.1)分(12～20分),ROWE评分分别为(18.4±8.3)分(5～30分)和(95.3±5.3)分(80～100分);术后无再脱位患者。对两组患者术后肩关节活动度分别测量的结果显示,两组患者术后中立位外旋活动度恢复趋势无明显差异。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,两组患者术后不稳复发率差异有统计学意义(P=0.043)。结论:关节镜下盂唇修补合并改良Remplissage手术是治疗伴肱骨头中小型Hill-Sachs损伤的创伤性复发性肩关节前方不稳的有效方法,可显著提高肩关节稳定性,并对术后肩关节活动度无明显影响。     

部队官兵复发性肩关节脱位诊治及疗效评估

目的探讨基层部队官兵复发性肩关节脱位的原因、治疗方法及预后。方法回顾分析我院骨科2000年8月—2012年8月期间收治的确诊为复发性肩关节脱位的27例官兵的临床资料,并采用Rowe评分量表和牛津大学肩关节不稳评分量表(OSIS)对随访患者进行评估。结果 25例患者接受手术,术后21例完成随访,随访时间为6～72(46.7±3.76)个月。15例肩关节功能恢复正常,3例外旋、上举轻度受限,2例脱位复发,1例存在活动疼痛。手术前后Rowe评分为(38.1±14.8)分和(85.8±14.6)分(P<0.01)。术后优良率较术前提高76.1%;手术前后OSIS评分为(42.7±6.4)分和(19.7±5.8)分(P<0.01)。结论初次脱位后全面的诊断、充足的固定时间、合适的手术方式选择以及术后系统的康复锻炼是预防和治疗部队官兵复发性肩关节脱位的关键环节。     

改良小切口Bristow手术治疗习惯性肩关节前下脱位的临床随访观察

目的 介绍改良小切口Bristow手术治疗习惯性肩关节前下脱位方法,并观察其临床疗效. 方法 肩关节复发性前下脱位11例.取肩关节前方约3～5 mm切口,采用"移动窗"技术,暴露喙突并予以截骨,通过肩袖间隙将喙突连带肱二头肌短头固定于肩胛颈前下方.11例术后采用Rowe肩关节修正评分进行临床随访,平均随访15.8个月(6～48个月). 结果 手术时间平均为45 min(40～65 min).术后Rowe肩关节修正评分80～95分,结果伞为优,成功率100%.随访期间无复发与并发症. 结论 改良小切口Bristow手术较传统Bristow手术切口小,手术创伤小,手术时间短,临床效果好.     

创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位的关节镜检查和手术治疗

目的 利用关节镜观察创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位的病理类型和病变程度,为手术方法的选择提供依据,探讨改良Bristow术式和镜下Bankart重建术的临床疗效. 方法 回顾性研究1997年7月～2007年10月,创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位患者62例,其中男44例,女18例;年龄21～67岁.平均39.8岁.术前脱位痫程平均87个月.手术中先行肩关节镜检查,根据镜下观察关节脱位的病理类型、病变程度如:有无肩盂、肱骨头骨性缺损、Bankart 损伤程度和关节囊盂肱切带松弛等病变分别行政良Bristow手术或关节镜下缝合锚Bankart 重建术.疗效评估用加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)功能评分. 结果 行改良Bristow手术45例,关节镜下缝合锚Bankaa重建术17例.,术后平均随访64.2个月,术前与术后平均UCLA评分分别为22.6±4.4和29.8±4.2(P＜0.01),肩关节前屈上举分别为(136.8±14.2).和(156.6±17.8).(P＜0.01),外展90°位外旋(52,5±16.4)°和(72.4±11.3)°(P＜0.01).终末随访时所有患者均未发生术后再次脱位,术后恐惧试验阳性6例(9.6%),其中60例(97%)患并恢复术前工作.所有患者被问及若健侧肩关节出现相同疾病时.都愿意接受相同手术治疗. 结论 利用关节镜观察创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位的病理改变及病因,为选择适当的手术方法提供参考.清晰处理肩关节不稳定病变原因、重建肩关节解削结构,恢复关节的稳定性,掌握好不同手术方法的指征,无论是改良Bristow手术方法还是镜下缝合锚Bankart 重建术都应是治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的有效方法.     

A long-term retrospective study of the modified Bristow procedure

A retrospective follow-up study is presented on the results in 51 patients who underwent the modified Bristow procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation between 1972 and 1982. The average follow-up period was 95 months. Postoperatively, 6% of the patients had recurrent anterior dislocation and 4% had recurrent anterior subluxations. Another 4% of the patients developed posterior subluxation after surgery. Seventy-six percent of the patients felt that there was no postoperative limitation in their activities. Eighteen percent felt limited in throwing sports and 4% felt limited in swinging sports. Fourteen percent of the patients had screw complications that involved screws causing pain (6%), fractured screws (4%), bent screws (2%), and loose screws (2%). Additional surgical procedures were required in 14% of patients: screw removal (8%), hematoma drainage (2%), and reoperation using the modified Bristow procedure (4%). Ninety-two percent of the patients assessed their surgical results as excellent or good.