HTLV-I/II prevalence in different geographic locations

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) type I (HTLV-I) is the etiological agent of adult T-cell leukemia and HTLV-I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). HTLV-II is a closely related virus, and this infection is not clearly associated with clinical disease, although neurologic disorders are observed resembling HAM/TSP. Prevalence rates for HTLV-I infection in the general population are greater than 1% in the Caribbean Basin, Central Africa, and South Japan. In most other areas in the world, as far as we know, HTLV-I/II infections are mainly found in high-risk groups (ie, immigrants from endemic areas, their offspring, their sexual contacts and in patients and intravenous injection users attending sexually transmitted disease clinics). Also, a high rate of infection for both HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection was observed in the native Amerindian population in North America as well as South America. Blood donors are routinely screened for HTLV-I/II in North America, several countries in Europe, Japan, and Taiwan.     

Sensitivity of Two Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay Tests in Relation to Western Blot in Detecting Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Types I and II Infection among HIV-1 Infected Patients from São Paulo,Brazil

We investigated the presence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) infections, first searching for specific antibodies in 553 serum samples obtained from HIV-1-infected patients from São Paulo, Brazil. Sera were screened using two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs): the ELISA-EM (ELISA HTLV-I/II, EMBRABIO, BR), which contains HTLV-I and HTLV-II lysates, and the ELISA-DB [ELISA HTLV-I/II, Diagnostic Biotechnology (DB), Singapore], which contains HTLV-I lysate, and HTLV-I and HTLV-II recombinant env proteins (MTA-1 and K55, respectively). Serum samples showing two positive and/or borderline results were confirmed by Western blot (WB 2.3, DB), which discriminates HTLV-I from HTLV-II. WB analyses disclosed 22 cases (4.0%) of HTLV-I and 34 (6.1%) of HTLV-II seroreactivity; 24 sera had indeterminate antibody profile (4.3%) and 2 specimens showed reactivity to both MTA-1 and K55 env proteins. Using stringent WB criteria and analyzing the population according to risk factors, the prevalence rates of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections were 11.2% and 16.8% in IV drug users, 3.4% and 5.5% in heterosexual individuals, and 1.4% and 2.2% in homosexual/bisexual men, respectively. A comparison of ELISA and WB results disclosed that both ELISAs were highly sensitive in detecting HTLV-I antibodies, whereas the ELISA-DB showed 82% sensitivity and the ELISA-EM 100% sensitivity in detecting HTLV-II antibodies. PCR analyses conducted on 37 representative cells samples confirmed the presence of HTLV proviral DNA in the majority of concordant serological cases, except in one, which was HTLV-I infected and seroreacted with K55 protein of HTLV-II. Indeed, after PCR, one case of HTLV-I infection and HTLV-II coinfection, and 30% of WB-seroindeterminate or inconclusive cases infected with HTLV-II could be detected. Our data stress high prevalences of both HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections in HIV-1 coinfected i.v. drug users from São Paulo, and suggests that ELISA kits containing only K55 protein as the HTLV-II-specific antigen, may not have the appropriate sensitivity for the detection of HTLV-II infection in this geographic region, pointing out the need of improved screening tests to be used in Brazil.     

Absence of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II infection in an Ontario hemophilia population

Two hundred ninety-three serum samples from Ontario hemophiliacs and 200 samples from human immunodeficiency virus-positive blood donors were screened for the presence of antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, and Western blot techniques. None of the serum samples provided unequivocal positive results, but several samples gave inconclusive results. Of the hemophiliacs with inconclusive serologic results from whom peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA could be obtained, all were negative for HTLV-I and HTLV type II (HTLV-II) sequences as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR was also performed on a lymph node biopsy sample taken from a hemophiliac who developed a rare T-cell lymphoma; the sample was negative for HTLV-I and -II sequences. These results indicate that Ontario hemophiliacs have not been exposed to HTLV-I or HTLV-II.     

Evaluation of a new third-generation ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay for blood screening and diagnosis

In comparison to current on-market assays, the ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay is the first fully automated assay that simultaneously detects human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) in human serum and plasma. Specificity was assessed on 5646 blood donors and 692 clinical specimens. For sensitivity determination, 301 HTLV-I–positive and 105 HTLV-II–positive specimens were tested. Precision was between 3.98% and 4.31% coefficient of variation (CV) for specimens with 1 to 6 sample to cutoff. Specificity was 99.95% and 99.86% on specimens from blood donors and hospitalized patients, respectively. Sensitivity evaluation showed 100% detection on 301 HTLV-I and 105 HTLV-II specimens. HTLV-I and HTLV-II viruses are still circulating among general populations even in the low prevalence areas. To control the further spread of these retroviruses, we need to know that it is important to continue screening of blood. The performance evaluation data from this study demonstrate that the high throughput and fully automated ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II chemiluminescence immunoassay effectively serves this purpose.     

In vitro photochemical inactivation of cell-associated human T-cell leukemia virus Type I and II in human platelet concentrates and plasma by use of amotosalen

BACKGROUND: Human T-cell leukemia virus Types I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II), blood-borne retroviruses found worldwide, can cause leukemia, immunosuppression, and severe neurologic diseases. In most countries, HTLV-I and -II screening is not performed systematically for blood donations. A new photochemical treatment (PCT) with a synthetic psoralen was developed to inactivate most pathogens in platelet (PLT) concentrates or plasma and to improve the safety of blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cell-associated HTLV-I or -II (10(6)/mL) was inoculated in full-size fresh PLT concentrates or fresh frozen plasma and treated with 150 micromol per L amotosalen (S-59) and different doses of long-wavelength ultraviolet A (UVA) light. The residual viral titer in the treated samples was assessed by a cocultivation assay on indicator cells. RESULTS: The inactivation obtained at a 3.0 J per cm2 UVA dose was greater than 5.2 log foci-forming units (FFUs) per mL for HTLV-I and 4.6 log FFUs per mL for HTLV-II in presence of human PLT concentrates and greater than 4.5 log FFUs per mL for HTLV-I and 5.7 log FFUs per mL for HTLV-II in the presence of human plasma. The residual infectivity was very low and shown as the limit of detection of the cocultivation assay. CONCLUSION: In human plasma or PLT concentrates, the retroviruses HTLV-I and -II were strongly sensitive to the PCT with 150 micromol per L amotosalen (S-59) and a 3.0 J per cm2 UVA dose. This high efficiency for photoinactivation of these retroviruses opens a possibility of improving the safety of PLTs or plasma transfusion in the future.     

Comparative performances of an HTLV-I/II EIA and other serologic and PCR assays on samples from persons at risk for HTLV-II infection

BACKGROUND: HTLV-I and HTLV-II are related exogenous pathogenic human retroviruses. Until recently, ELISAs based on HTLV-I antigens have been used to screen for the presence of HTLV-I or -II antibodies. The HTLV-I-based assays have not been as sensitive in detecting antibodies to HTLV-II as in detecting antibodies to HTLV-I. The Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II ELISA uses a combination of HTLV-I and HTLV-II antigens to detect antibodies to the whole HTLV group. The performance of this ELISA was compared to that of several HTLV-I-based serologic assays and an HTLV-II PCR assay in cohorts of South American Indians and New York City IV drug users (IVDUs) in whom HTLV-II is endemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 429 South American Indians and New York City IVDUs were evaluated for HTLV antibodies by the use of three ELISAs (rgp21-enhanced HTLV-I/II, Cambridge Biotech; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, Organon Teknika; and HTLV-I/HTLV-II, Abbott), and a Western blot (WB) assay. Peripheral blood leukocyte DNA from each person was analyzed for HTLV-I and HTLV-II pol DNA via PCR. The HTLV-II PCR-positive samples were further subtyped via cloning and sequencing and/or oligomer restriction. RESULTS: Two hundred four samples (48%) were positive for HTLV-II by serologic and/or PCR assays. All of the positive samples from the Indians and approximately one-third of the positive samples from the IVDUs were of the HTLV-IIB subtype. Comparative analyses indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the various assays were: PCR, 98 and 100 percent; Abbott HTLV-I/HTLV-II, 78 and 95 percent; Cambridge Biotech HTLV-I/II, 76 and 96 percent; Vironostika HTLV-I/II, 71 and 98 percent; and WB, 73 and 100 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences among the sensitivities and specificities of the HTLV-I/II ELISAs (p values, 0.056-0.438). The WB and PCR assays were much more specific than the other serologic assays (p相似文献   

Human T-lymphotropic virus type II in Panamanian Guaymi Indians

BACKGROUND: Currently, human T-lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) is the most prevalent human retrovirus, detected in persons presenting to donate blood in the United States. Only scant information is available with which to counsel HTLV-II-seropositive deferred donors or other persons about the ways in which they may spread HTLV-II to others. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To increase understanding of the modes of transmission of HTLV-II, a seroepidemiologic study was conducted among Panamanian Guaymi Indians, a recently identified focus of endemic HTLV- II infection. Subjects were tested for serologic evidence of infection by HTLV-II, HTLV type I, hepatitis B virus, and nine other infectious agents by enzyme immunoassays and specific confirmatory tests. RESULTS: Nine (8.3%) of 109 persons tested HTLV-II-seropositive. HTLV-II seropositivity was more likely in persons with serologic evidence of prior hepatitis B virus infection. Sexual contact with HTLV-II- seropositive partners, but neither parenteral exposure nor breast- feeding, was identified as a risk factor for HTLV-II. CONCLUSION: In Guaymi Indians, HTLV-II appears to be spread primarily through sexual transmission.     

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and II in transfusion medicine.

As a consequence of migrating populations, IV drug use and, to a lesser extent, blood transfusions, endemic HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections have spread to nonendemic geographic regions. Although the risk that a person infected with HTLV-I will develop significant disease--even over a lifetime--is estimated to be relatively low, our awareness of the serious diseases associated with other retroviruses requires a cautious approach to blood transfusion. Reports from Japan and the United States indicate that programs testing donated blood and excluding units with HTLV-I antibodies have been highly successful in interrupting the spread of HTLV-I by transfusions. One unanticipated outcome of testing large numbers of people in the United States for HTLV-I antibodies has been recognition of the relatively high prevalence of HTLV-II infection, particularly among IV drug users. The long-term effects of HTLV-II infection are also unknown. Until the natural history and clinical consequences of HTLV-II infection are clearly understood, it is only prudent that blood donated by persons identified to be HTLV-II carriers also be excluded.     

In vivo cellular tropism of human T cell leukemia virus type II (HTLV- II)

To investigate the in vivo cellular tropism of human T cell leukemia virus type II (HTLV-II), subpopulations of fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells from infected individuals were isolated and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of provirus. In eight of nine patients, HTLV-II was detected exclusively in the CD8+ T lymphocyte population. In the remaining patient, provirus was also detected in CD4+ T lymphocytes. Provirus was not detected in B lymphocytes or monocytes of any patient. These results suggest that in vivo HTLV-II has a preferential, and perhaps in some cases, an exclusive tropism for CD8+ T lymphocytes. The findings contrast sharply with those on HTLV-I where there is a preferential tropism for CD4+ T lymphocytes. Although HTLV-II infection has not been consistently associated with any lymphoproliferative disorders, the results suggest that if these occur, they may be different from those known to be associated with HTLV-I.     

Comparative evaluation of 14 immunoassays for detection of antibodies to the human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II using panels of sera from Sweden and West Africa

BACKGROUND: A new generation of assays for the detection of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I/II) antibodies has been released. These assays incorporate HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some are based on new assay principles. Comparative evaluation data that include these new as well as previous assays are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen HTLV antibody assays were evaluated by using well-characterized panels of sera from Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, and Sweden. The sera included 127 HTLV-I-positive and 62 HTLV-II-positive specimens, as well as 919 consecutive negative samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was 100 percent for all assays, except one, which repeatedly missed one sample. The sensitivity for HTLV-II varied between 86 percent and 100 percent. In general, new-generation assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens, and some of which are based on new assay principles, had a higher sensitivity for HTLV-II than previous assays, which mainly are based on HTLV-I antigens. The specificity was generally higher for new assays than for the previous versions. Testing of Swedish blood donor sera gave higher specificities (94-100%) than did that of African specimens (90-99.7%). Most assays had low delta values (DVs), although there was a tendency toward increased DVs for the new generation of assays. Only two of the new generation of assays came close to a combination of high sensitivity for both HTLV-I and HTLV-II, high specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and high DVs. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity for HTLV-I was generally high and appears to have improved for HTLV-II with the introduction of a new generation of assays incorporating HTLV-II-specific antigens. However, some assays still give false-negative results on HTLV-II-positive specimens. The specificities and the DVs were generally higher for the new assays than for the previous versions.     

Comparative performances of enzyme-linked immunosorbent, western blot, and polymerase chain reaction assays for human T-lymphotropic virus type II infection that is endemic among Indians of the Gran Chaco region of South America

BACKGROUND : Human T-cell lymphoma/leukemia viruses types I and II (HTLV- I and HTLV-II) are related exogenous human retroviruses. The former is definitely pathogenic while disease association with the latter is unclear. There are two subtypes of HTLV-II, A and B. Currently, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on HTLV-I antigens are used to screen for the presence of HTLV-I and -II antibodies. Confirmation and subtyping are accomplished by Western blot (WB) or ELISAs based on HTLV-I whole viral antigens and/or HTLV-I and HTLV-IIA peptides. The sensitivity and specificity of these serologic assays were compared to those of HTLV-I and-II-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in tests on samples from Indians from South America in whom the HTLV- IIB subtype is endemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Sera from 246 Gran Chaco Indians were evaluated for HTLV antibodies with the use of four ELISAs (Retrotek HTLV-I; Cambridge Biotech rgp21 enhanced HTLV-I/II; Vironostika HTLV-I/II; and Select HTLV-I/II), and a WB assay. Peripheral blood leukocyte DNA from each Indian was analyzed for HTLV-I or HTLV-II pol DNA via PCR. Fifteen of the PCR-positive samples were further subtyped via cloning and sequencing and/or oligomer restriction. RESULTS : Ninety-seven samples (39%) were positive for HTLV- II by serologic and/or PCR assays. All 15 positive DNA samples that were further analyzed were of the HTLV-IIB subtype and were clustered as a highly conserved phylogenetic group. Comparative analyses indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the various assays were: PCR, 97 and 100 percent; Retrotek, 70 and 91 percent; Cambridge Biotech, 74 and 96 percent; Vironostika, 73 and 99 percent; Select 72 and 98 percent; and WB, 70 and 100 percent. CONCLUSION : The sensitivities of the tested HTLV serologic assays were comparable. However, the specificity of the Retrotek ELISA was significantly lower than that of the others. When positive, the subtyping assays were very specific. However, PCR assays would seem preferable or to be a necessary adjunct for the sensitive detection of HTLV-IIB infection.     

Transfusion transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II: serologic and polymerase chain reaction results in recipients identified through look-back investigations

To determine the transmissibility of human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) via transfusion, persons who, from 1983 to 1989, received blood components donated by persons who subsequently tested anti-HTLV-I-positive were evaluated. It was found that 16 (30%) of 54 evaluable recipients of transfused cellular components became infected with one of the HTLVs: 8 had HTLV-I and 8 had HTLV-II. Forty percent of platelet recipients and 28 percent of red cell recipients acquired infection. The rate of transmission of HTLV-I and HTLV-II was significantly correlated with storage age of red cell units prior to transfusion: 47 percent for red cells stored < or = 14 days and 0 for red cells stored > 14 days (p < 0.01). Multiple confirmatory serologic tests performed in 46 anti-HTLV-I enzyme immunoassay-negative recipients revealed that HTLV infection could not be excluded in 3 recipients of blood components from HTLV-II-infected donors. Polymerase chain reaction established HTLV-II infection in one recipient, and the other two recipients could not be classified with respect to HTLV infection status. It appears that some HTLV-II-infected transfusion recipients will not be detected by existing HTLV-I antigen-based reagents. If it is deemed necessary to initiate or continue look-back programs to detect transfusion transmission of HTLV-II infection, it is suggested that the current testing algorithm be modified in selected cases.     

Serologic distinction between human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) type I and HTLV type II

In November 1988, the Food and Drug Administration approved reagents for serologic screening for human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) infection in blood donors and patients suspected of having HTLV-I-related illnesses. These reagents are able to detect HTLV type II (HTLV-II), a close relative of HTLV-I with no known pathologic effect. The distinction between the two forms of HTLV is important to the donor and to any recipient of blood containing HTLV. The application to sera from 38 seropositive blood donors and 2 recipients (37 "confirmed" positive and 3 indeterminate by Western blot) of two methods (Western blot and peptide enzyme immunoassay) for serologic distinction between HTLV-I and -II is described. These results were compared to those from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of HTLV proviral DNA obtained from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The peptide enzyme immunoassay was found to be less sensitive than the Western blot, but completely concordant with PCR results when differential reactivity could be established. The Western blot pattern showed complete diagnostic concordance with the samples with confirmed-positive serologic tests, but was incorrect in two HTLV-II-infected donors with indeterminate serologic tests. Thirty-three (89%) of the 37 individuals from this predominantly Native American and Hispanic group of blood donors were found to have HTLV-II. These findings confirm and extend previous reports that HTLV-I infection may be less common, and HTLV-II infection more common, than previously believed. The peptide enzyme immunoassay can provide most individuals who have positive results with the HTLV-I/II screening test with serologic distinction between HTLV-I and HTLV-II.     

Strategies for diagnosis of HTLV-I and -II

BACKGROUND: No gold standard exists for diagnosis of HTLV infection. The aim of thus study was to compare the accuracy of a combination of two sensitive ELISAs with Western blot (WB), a line immunoassay, and PCR for diagnosis of HTLV infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine hundred eighty-five specimens were tested for the presence of HTLV antibodies by HTLV-I and/or HTLV-II EIAs (Murex and Ortho), WB (Diagnostic Biotechnology), line immunoassay (INNO-LIA, Innogenetics), and/or presence of HTLV DNA by PCR. The results were compared with the probable HTLV infection status of each subject, as determined by detailed review of all available laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic data. RESULTS: The sensitivity for diagnosis of HTLV-I infection was high for all assays evaluated, but both PCR and WB had a lower sensitivity rate (approx., 80%) for confirmation of HTLV-II. INNO-LIA detected 94 percent of the HTLV-II-positive samples. However, Murex EIA in combination with Ortho EIA was 100-percent sensitive for the detection of both HTLV-I and HTLV-II antibodies. Furthermore, the number of samples giving indeterminate results in the ELISA combination was much lower as compared with WB (2.5% vs. 50%). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, a new, more sensitive and specific test strategy for HTLV diagnosis than the current algorithm, which includes WB, is proposed. Thereby, both the direct and indirect costs can be substantially reduced.     

Evaluation of a combined lysate/recombinant antigen anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA in high and low endemic areas of HTLV-I/II infection

SUMMARY. The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA (Murex Diagnostics) was evaluated in 7800 samples of various serum panels. Repeat reactivity was found by Wellcozyme in (A) 1/2181 (0.05%) Dutch blood donors, (B) 44/3036 (1.4%) Curaçao (Caribbean area) blood donors, (C) 46/2533 (1.8%) individuals of different Ethiopian population subsets, (D) 30/30 (100%) confirmed anti-HTLV-I positive samples and (E) 20/20 (100%) HTLV-II PCR-positive samples. All 91 Wellcozyme-positive samples were tested for confirmation by Western blot (WB, Diagnostic Biotechnology). Among Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA-positive individuals, HTLV-I/II WB positivity was found in 0/1 Dutch blood donors, 40/44 (88.9%) Curaçao blood donors and 20/46 (43.5%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-I positivity was found in 40 (1.3%) WB-positive Curaçao blood donors and in 9 (0.35%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-II positivity was found in 11 (0.43%) WB-positive Ethiopian individuals. The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA had a specificity of 99.95% in Dutch blood donors and a sensitivity of 100% in confirmed HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-positive samples. In Ethiopia 55% of the HTLV-I/II WB-positive individuals were exclusively HTLV-II positive, whereas in Curaçao no HTLV-II infections were found.     

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I and type II infections and correlation with risk factors in blood donors from Sao Paulo, Brazil

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of and risk factors for human T-lymphotropic virus type I and type II (HTLV-I, HTLV-II) infections in Brazil. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 17,063 healthy Brazilian donors were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody to HTLV-I/II between August 1991 and July 1993. Repeatedly reactive samples were confirmed by Western blot, and discrimination between HTLV-I and HTLV-II was made by polymerase chain reaction or synthetic peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A univariate analysis was performed on demographic and serologic data. RESULTS: HTLV-I infection was demonstrated in 83 percent of the 30 donors with reactive serologic tests (0.15% of the total tested [17,063]; 95% CI, 0.09-0.20) and HTLV-II infection in 17 percent (0.03% of the total tested [17,063]; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05). HTLV-I-positive donors were more likely than reference groups to be of Asian ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 15.1; reference group: whites), more than 50 years old (OR 4.2; reference group: 20–29 years old), and positive for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) (OR 21.8) or to hepatitis B core (antigen) (anti-HBc) (OR 5.7). HTLV-II showed a significant association with anti-HCV (OR 75.2) and anti-HBc (OR 21.8). Eleven of the 25 HTLV-I- positive donors were counseled. Family origin in endemic areas of Japan (n = 4), prior blood transfusion (n = 3), or sexual contact with prostitutes (n = 1) were the risk factors reported by 8 donors. In 3 white men, no risk factors could be identified. CONCLUSION: Both HTLV-I and HTLV-II occur among Brazilian blood donors. HTLV-I is associated with Asian ethnicity, greater age, and the presence of anti-HCV and anti-HBc. Three HTLV-I-positive donors had a history of blood transfusion, which emphasizes the need for HTLV-I/II screening in Brazil.     

Human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) types I and II infection in sexual contacts and family members of blood donors who are seropositive for HTLV type I or II. American Red Cross HTLV-I/II Collaborative Study Group

Interviews and laboratory testing were conducted for 168 contacts referred by former blood donors identified as seropositive for antibody to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) or type II (HTLV-II). Thirty-two (28%) of 114 heterosexual contacts of seropositive donors, including 12 women and 20 men, were found to be antibody positive. None of 40 offspring (except one adult man who reported sexual contact in Puerto Rico) or 14 other (nonspousal) family members were seropositive. Thirty-one of the seropositive contacts were typeable as having either HTLV-I (52%) or HTLV-II (48%). Assessment of couples found that the median duration of the sexual relationship was significantly longer (p = 0.03) for those in which both partners were infected than in discordant pairs. Analysis of risk history data for 22 infected couples revealed that, in three cases, risk factors (Japanese ancestry or sexual contact with an injecting drug user) could be identified in the women, but not in their male partners. Among couples in which the male had the greater risk history, the risk factor was either a history of transfusion, birth or sexual exposure in an endemic area, or injected drug use. Counseling strategies for individuals with HTLV-I or HTLV-II infection should take into account the relatively high seroprevalence in their partners and should address the potential for sexual transmission in both directions.     

Absence of evidence of infection with divergent primate T-lymphotropic viruses in United States blood donors who have seroindeterminate HTLV test results

BACKGROUND: Recent identification of divergent simian or primate T-lymphotropic viruses (STLVs; PTLVs) in bonobos (formerly called pygmy chimpanzees; Pan paniscus; viruses: STLVpan-p and STLVpp1664) and a baboon (Papio hamadryas; viruses: STLVph969 or PTLV-L) have raised the possibility of human infection with these viruses. Divergent PTLV-infected primate sera show p24 bands on HTLV-I Western blots (WBs). It was investigated whether infection by divergent PTLV-like viruses could explain a subset of United States blood donors who reacted on HTLV-I EIAs and had indeterminate HTLV-I WBs with p24 bands. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Epidemiologic characteristics of 1889 donors with HTLV-I-indeterminate WBs were compared to those of donors with confirmed retrovirus infections (393 with HIV, 201 with HTLV-I, 513 with HTLV-II) and 1.6 million donors with nonreactive screening tests. To directly probe for infection with divergent PTLVs, 2 HTLV-I-indeterminate donors born in Africa and 269 representative non-African-born donors with p24 bands on HTLV-I WBs (previously shown to be negative for HTLV-I and -II DNA by PCR) were selected for PTLV PCR analysis. DNA from peripheral blood MNC samples was tested for a proviral tax sequence by PCR using generic primers that amplify HTLV-I, HTLV-II, and the divergent PTLVs. Amplified tax sequences were detected by Southern blot hybridization to a (32)P-labeled generic PTLV probe. PCR-positive samples could then be typed by hybridization with virus-specific internal probes that differentiate HTLV-I, HTLV-II, PTLV-L, and STLVpan-p. RESULTS: In the epidemiologic analysis, HTLV-indeterminate status was independently associated with age of at least 25 years (OR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.93-2.49), black (OR = 3.27; 95% CI, 2.90-3.67) or Hispanic (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.52-2.16) race or ethnicity, and donation at one blood center (Baltimore) (OR = 1. 30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.53). None of the 271 HTLV-I WB-indeterminate samples tested positive by generic PTLV PCR analysis. CONCLUSION: Although the epidemiologic data suggest the possibility of undiagnosed HTLV-I, HTLV-II, or a cross-reactive virus such as PTLV among older, black, and Hispanic blood donors, the PCR data do not support the presence of divergent PTLV infection among US blood donors with HTLV-I-indeterminate results.     

Low incidence of HTLV infections in random blood donors with indeterminate western blot patterns

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were recovered from platelet units of 61 blood donors who were HTLV-I positive and 3 blood donors who were HTLV-I negative on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Western blot analyses were performed on the sera and DNA was prepared from the PBMCs and analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of the 61 repeatably reactive samples, 2 were positive, 26 were negative, and 33 were interpreted as indeterminate on Western blot. HTLV-II sequences were detected by PCR in one of the Western blot-positive samples, as well as in one Western blot-indeterminate sample that showed reactivity to p24 only. HTLV-I sequences were detected in the second Western blot-positive sample. HTLV sequences were not detected in the remaining samples, which suggested that the majority of individuals with indeterminate results on Western blots that used one set of commercially available reagents are not infected with HTLV. It is demonstrated in this study that PCR can be used not only to resolve the infection status of individuals with indeterminate Western blots but also to distinguish between HTLV-I and HTLV-II.     

Overt and latent HIV 1 and HTLV-I infection in cohorts of at high risk individuals in Argentina

We conducted a survey using serology and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect HIV 1 and/or HTLV-I antibodies and viral DNA, respectively, in 113 intravenous drug abusers and in 62 sexually active high risk individuals attending two Drug Addict Centres and a Centre for Venereal Diseases in Buenos Aires, Argentina. At the time of the survey 137 of these subjects were known to be HIV 1 seropositive but none of them was symptomatic. Serological tests for HTLV-I were found to be positive in 38 (21.7%) of the HIV 1 positive individuals, whereas all of the 38 HIV 1 seronegative subjects were also seronegative for HTLV-I antibodies. Gene amplification assays carried out in blood sample DNA from the 38 HIV 1/HTLV-I seronegative individuals, revealed HIV 1 DNA in six out of 28 intravenous drug abusers (21.5%). One subject (2.6%) was positive for both HIV 1 and HTLV-I DNA sequences, whereas four (10.5%) showed HTLV-I DNA only. To determine whether these individuals were infected with HTLV-I and/or HTLV-II, DNA samples were also amplified with HTLV-II specific primers and no evidence of HTLV-II infection was observed. None of the subjects seroconverted according to conventional serological tests during the 2 year follow-up period. The 10 seronegative subjects belonging to the sexual risk group were negative for both HIV 1 and HTLV-I in polymerase chain reaction assays. We conclude that not only HIV 1, but also HTLV-I is a widely spread infection in intravenous drug abusers and sexually active high risk individuals in Argentina.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)