EMG activity of trunk muscles and torque output during isometric axial rotation exertion: a comparison between back pain patients and matched controls.

Abnormal patterns of trunk muscle activity could affect the biomechanics of spinal movements and result in back pain. The present study aimed to examine electromyographic (EMG) activity of abdominal and back muscles as well as triaxial torque output during isometric axial rotation at different exertion levels in back pain patients and matched controls. Twelve back pain patients and 12 matched controls performed isometric right and left axial rotation at 100%, 70%, 50% and 30% maximum voluntary contractions in a standing position. Surface EMG activity of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, iliocostalis lumborum and multifidus were recorded bilaterally. The primary torque in the transverse plane and the coupling torques in sagittal and coronal planes were measured. Results showed that there was a trend (P = 0.08) of higher flexion coupling torque during left axial rotation exertion in back pain patients. Higher activity for external oblique and lower activity for multifidus was shown during left axial rotation exertion in back pain group when compared to the control group. In right axial rotation, back pain patients exhibited lesser activity of rectus abdominis at higher levels of exertion when compared with matched controls. These findings demonstrated that decreased activation of one muscle may be compensated by overactivity in other muscles. The reduced levels of activity of the multifidus muscle during axial rotation exertion in back pain patients may indicate that spinal stability could be compromised. Future studies should consider these alternations in recruitment patterns in terms of spinal stability and internal loading. The findings also indicate the importance of training for coordination besides the strengthening of trunk muscles during rehabilitation process.     

Functional roles of abdominal and back muscles during isometric axial rotation of the trunk.

Electromyographic (EMG) studies have shown that a large number of trunk muscles are recruited during axial rotation. The functional roles of these trunk muscles in axial rotation are multiple and have not been well investigated. In addition, there is no information on the coupling torque at different exertion levels during axial rotation. The aim of the study was to investigate the functional roles of rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, iliocostalis lumborum and multifidus during isometric right and left axial rotation at 100%, 70%, 50% and 30% maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) in a standing position. The coupling torques in sagittal and coronal planes were measured during axial rotation to examine the coupling nature of torque at different levels of exertions. Results showed that the coupled sagittal torque switches from nil to flexion at maximum exertion of axial rotation. Generally, higher EMG activities were shown at higher exertion levels for all the trunk muscles. Significant differences in activity between the right and left axial rotation exertions were demonstrated in external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi and iliocostalis lumborum while no difference was shown in rectus abdominis and multifidus. These results demonstrated the different functional roles of trunk muscles during axial rotation. This is important considering that the abdominal and back muscles not only produce torque but also maintain the spinal posture and stability during axial rotation exertions. The changing coupling torque direction in the sagittal plane when submaximal to maximal exertions were compared may indicate the complex nature of the kinetic coupling of trunk muscles.     

Effects of specific exercise instructions on abdominal muscle activity during trunk curl exercises

STUDY DESIGN: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. OBJECTIVES: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. BACKGROUND: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. METHODS AND MEASURES: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. RESULTS: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [+/- SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 +/- 0.34) than when following RE (mean [+/- SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 +/- 0.24) or NS (mean [ISD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 +/- 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. CONCLUSIONS: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk     

The activity of individual trunk muscles during heavy physical loading

The myoelectric activity of ten trunk muscles were recorded, using intramuscular electrodes, when ten subjects made maximal and 50% of maximal static exertions in standing postures. Exertions were made in flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending. Three heavy-lifting tasks also were studied. A biomechanical model was used to predict the forces in the trunk muscles, and the predictions then were compared to the measurements. The abdominal muscles were all active in attempted flexion, while the erector spinae muscles were inactive. In attempted extension, the erectors were maximally active, but considerable activity was present in the abdominal muscles as well. The highest activity levels recorded in the oblique abdominal muscles were in lateral bending. There were high degrees of correlation between the measured muscle activities and predicted muscle tensions for the erector spinae and rectus abdominus muscles, while the correlation coefficients for the oblique abdominal muscles were lower (0.4-0.7). The study indicates that inclusion of antagonistic activity is an important consideration to improve model predictions. The oblique abdominal muscles appear to be more active, in general, than predicted. For the longitudinal trunk muscles, the predictions are excellent throughout.     

Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics.

This study focused on the electromyographic activity of the trunk musculature, given the well-documented link between occupational twisting and the increased incidence of low back pain. Ten men and 15 women volunteered for this study, in which several aspects of muscle activity were examined. The first aspect assessed the myoelectric relationships during isometric exertions. There was great variability in this relationship between muscles and between subjects. Further, the myoelectric activity levels (normalized to maximal electrical activity) obtained from nontwist activities were not maximal despite maximal efforts to generate axial torque (e.g., rectus abdominis, maximum voluntary contraction; 22% external oblique, 52%; internal oblique, 55%; latissimus dorsi, 74%; upper erector spinae [T9], 61%; lower erector spinae [L3], 33%). In the second aspect of the study, muscle activity was examined during dynamic axial twist trials conducted at a velocity of 30 and 60 degrees/s. The latissimus dorsi and external oblique appeared to be strongly involved in the generation of axial torque throughout the twist range and activity in the upper erector spinae displayed a strong link with axial torque and direction of twist, even though they have no mechanical potential to contribute axial torque, suggesting a stabilization role. The third aspect of the study was comprised of the formulation of a model consisting of a three-dimensional pelvis, rib cage, and lumbar vertebrae and driven from kinematic measures of axial twist and muscle electromyograms. The relatively low levels of normalized myoelectric activity during maximal twisting efforts coupled with large levels of agonist-antagonist cocontraction caused the model to severely underpredict measured torques (e.g., 14 Nm predicted for 91 Nm measured). Such dominant coactivity suggests that stabilization of the joints during twisting is far more important to the lumbar spine than production of large levels of axial torque.     

Dynamic EMG analysis of torque transfer in professional baseball pitchers

Fifteen professional baseball pitchers underwent active pitching motion analysis of the abdominal oblique, rectus abdominis, lumbar paraspinous and gluteus maximus muscles bilaterally via surface electrode evaluation. Baseline resting and isometric maximum values were obtained and active data referenced against these for comparison. The muscle activity then was measured during the pitching sequence and analyzed in each of the five pitching phases. The abdominal oblique, lumbar paraspinous and rectus abdominis contralateral to the pitching arm and the ipsilateral gluteus maximus all had increases in activity level of 75 to 100% during the active pitching motion. Using these data indicating specific muscle group patterns with clinical and performance data, we hope to minimize injuries and maximize pitching performance.     

The onset of deep abdominal muscles activity during tasks with different trunk rotational torques in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain

BackgroundAlthough delayed onset of the deep abdominal muscles activity in subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) has been suggested to be related to trunk rotational torque, no study has examined the onsets associated with non-specific CLBP during a variety of tasks with different trunk rotational torque. The aim of this study is to compare the onsets of deep abdominal muscles activity among tasks with different trunk rotational torques in subjects with and without non-specific CLBP.MethodsTwelve subjects with non-specific CLBP and 13 control subjects were included. They performed 8 types of upper limb movements. The onsets of muscular activity of bilateral internal oblique-transversus abdominis (IO-TrA) and trunk rotational torque due to the upper limb movements were measured using a surface electromyography and a three-dimensional motion analysis system.ResultsIn non-specific CLBP group, right IO-TrA activities were significantly delayed during tasks with left trunk rotational torque compared with the control (P < 0.05), while onsets of the left IO-TrA activities were significantly later than those of the control during tasks with right rotational torque of the trunk (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in onsets of both sides IO-TrA during tasks without trunk rotational torque between non-specific CLBP and control groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe onsets of IO-TrA activities in subjects with non-specific CLBP were delayed during tasks with rotational torque of the trunk in the opposite direction, suggesting a possibility that delayed onset of the deep abdominal muscles during rotational torque of the trunk might be etiology of chronic low back pain.     

Differential activity of regions of transversus abdominis during trunk rotation

The role of the abdominal muscles in trunk rotation is not comprehensively understood. This study investigated the electromyographic (EMG) activity of anatomically distinct regions of the abdominal muscles during trunk rotation in six subjects with no history of spinal pain. Fine-wire electrodes were inserted into the right abdominal wall; upper region of transversus abdominis (TrA), middle region of TrA, obliquus internus abdominis (OI) and obliquus externus abdominis (OE), and lower region of TrA and OI. Surface electrodes were placed over right rectus abdominis (RA). Subjects performed trunk rotation to the left and right in sitting by rotating their pelvis relative to a fixed thorax. EMG activity was recorded in relaxed supine and sitting, and during an isometric hold at end range. TrA was consistently active during trunk rotation, with the recruitment patterns of the upper fascicles opposite to that of the middle and lower fascicles. During left rotation, there was greater activity of the lower and middle regions of contralateral TrA and the lower region of contralateral OI. The upper region of ipsilateral TrA and OE were predominately active during right rotation. In contrast, there was no difference in activity of RA and middle OI between directions (although middle OI was different between directions for all but one subject). This study indicates that TrA is active during trunk rotation, but this activity varies between muscle regions. These normative data will assist in understanding the role of TrA in lumbopelvic control and movement, and the effect of spinal pain on abdominal muscle recruitment.     

Feedforward responses of transversus abdominis are directionally specific and act asymmetrically: implications for core stability theories

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study supplemented with a repeated case study. OBJECTIVE: To examine bilateral muscle activity of the deep abdominals in response to rapid arm raising, specifically to examine the laterality and directional specificity of feedforward responses of the transversus abdominis (TrA). BACKGROUND: Based on the feedforward responses of trunk muscles during rapid arm movements, authors have concluded that the deep trunk muscles have different control mechanisms compared to the more superficial muscles. It has been proposed that deep trunk muscles such as TrA contribute substantially to the stability of the lumbar spine and that this is achieved through simultaneous bilateral feedforward activation. These inferences are based on unilateral fine-wire electromyographic (EMG) data and there are limited investigations of bilateral responses of the TrA during unilateral arm raising. METHODS AND MEASURES: Bilateral fine-wire and surface EMG data from the anterior deltoid, TrA, obliquus internus (OI), obliquus externus, biceps femoris, erector spinae, and rectus abdominis during repeated arm raises were recorded at 2 kHz. EMG signal linear envelopes were synchronized to the onset of the anterior deltoid. A feedforward window was defined as the period up to 50 ms after the onset of the anterior deltoid, and paired onsets for bilateral muscles were plotted for both left and right arm movements. RESULTS: Trunk muscles from the group data demonstrated differences between sides (laterality), which were systematically altered when alternate arms were raised (directional specificity). This was clearly evident for the TrA but less obvious for the erector spinae. The ipsilateral biceps femoris and obliquus externus, and contralateral OI and TrA, were activated earlier than the alternate side for both right and left arm movements. This was a consistent pattern over a 7-year period for the case study. Data for the rectus abdominis derived from the case study demonstrated little laterality or directionally specific response. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that the feedforward activity of the TrA is specific to the direction of arm movement and not bilaterally symmetrical. The asymmetry of TrA activity during arm raising suggests that the interpretation of the role of TrA as a bilateral stabilizer during anticipatory postural adjustments needs to be revised. Future research needs to examine muscle synergies associated with the asymmetrical function of the TrA and the underlying mechanism associated with low-load stability training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 5.     

Trunk muscle cocontraction: the effects of moment direction and moment magnitude.

This study investigated the cocontraction of eight trunk muscles during the application of asymmetric loads to the torso. External moments of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Nm were applied to the torso via a harness system. The direction of the applied moment was varied by 30 degrees increments to the subjects' right side between the sagittally symmetric orientations front and rear. Electromyographic (EMG) data from the left and right latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominus were collected from 10 subjects. The normalized EMG data were tested using multivariate and univariate analyses of variance procedures. These analyses showed significant interactions between the moment magnitude and the moment direction for seven of the eight muscles. Most of the interactions could be characterized as due to changes in muscle recruitment with changes in the direction of the external moment. Analysis of the relative activation levels, which were computed for each combination of moment magnitude and direction, indicated large changes in muscle recruitment due to asymmetry, but only small adjustments in the relative activation levels due to increased moment magnitude.     

Electromyographic activity of trunk and hip muscles during stabilization exercises in four-point kneeling in healthy volunteers

Stabilization exercises are intended to optimize function of the muscles that are believed to govern trunk stability. Debate exists whether certain muscles are more important than others in optimally performing these exercises. Thirty healthy volunteers were asked to perform three frequently prescribed stabilization exercises in four-point kneeling. The electromyographic activity of different trunk and hip muscles was evaluated. Average amplitudes obtained during the exercises were normalized to the amplitude in maximal voluntary contraction (% MVIC). During all three exercises, the highest relative muscle activity levels (> 20% MVIC) were consistently found in the ipsilateral lumbar multifidus and gluteus maximus. During both the single leg extension (exercise 1) and the leg and arm extension exercise (exercise 2) the contralateral internal oblique and ipsilateral external oblique reached high levels (> 20%MVIC). During exercise 2 there were also high relative activity levels of the ipsilateral lumbar part and the contralateral thoracic part of the iliocostalis lumborum and the contralateral lumbar multifidus. During the leg and arm extension exercise with contralateral hip flexion (exercise 3) there were high relative muscle activity levels of all back muscles, except for the latissimus dorsi muscle. The lowest relative muscle activity levels (< 10% MVIC) were found in the rectus abdominis and the ipsilateral internal oblique during all exercises, and in the contralateral gluteus maximus during exercises 1 and 2. The results of this study show that in exercises in four-point kneeling performed by healthy subjects, hip and trunk muscles seem to work together in a harmonious way. This shows that when relative activity of muscles is measured, both “global and local” muscles function together in order to stabilize the spine.     

Internal and External Oblique Muscle Asymmetry in Sprint Hurdlers and Sprinters: A Cross-Sectional Study

The abdominal muscles are vital in providing core stability for functional movements during most activities. There is a correlation between side asymmetry of these muscles and dysfunction. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare trunk muscle morphology and trunk rotational strength between sprint hurdlers, an asymmetrical sport, and sprinters, a symmetrical sport. Twenty-one trained collegiate sprint hurdlers and sprinters were recruited for the study (Hurdlers: 4M, 7F; Sprinters: 8M, 2F), average age (years) hurdlers: 20 ± 1.2; sprinters: 20.4 ± 1.9, height (cm) hurdlers: 172.6 ± 10.2; sprinters: 181.7 ± 4.5, and weight (kg) hurdlers: 67.6 ± 12.0; sprinters: 73.9 ± 5.6. Using real-time ultrasound, panoramic images of the internal oblique (IO) and external oblique (EO) were obtained at rest and contracted (flexion and rotation) in a seated position for both right and left sides of the trunk. While wearing a specially crafted shoulder harness, participants performed three maximal voluntary trunk rotational contractions (MVC). The three attempts were then averaged to obtain an overall MVC score for trunk rotation strength. Average MVC trunk rotational strength to the right was greater among all participants, p < 0.001. The IO showed greater and significant thickness changes from resting to contracted state than the EO, this was observed in all participants. The IO side asymmetry was significantly different between groups p < 0.01. Hurdlers, involved in a unilaterally demanding sport, exhibited the expected asymmetry in muscle morphology and in trunk rotational strength. Interestingly, sprinters, although involved in a seemingly symmetrical sport, also exhibited asymmetrical trunk morphology and trunk rotational strength. Key points

• The internal and external oblique muscles exhibit a morphological asymmetry in collegiate hurdlers and sprinters.
• A greater thickness change from rest to contraction was seen in the internal oblique compared to the external oblique among the hurdlers and sprinters.
• A statistically significant difference in asymmetry of the internal oblique between left and right sides was seen between the hurdlers and sprinters.

Key words: Asymmetry, internal oblique, external oblique, trunk muscle thickness, panoramic ultrasound     

The in vivo dynamic response of the human spine to rapid lateral bend perturbation: effects of preload and step input magnitude.

STUDY DESIGN: A repeated measures design was used to determine the effects that combinations of two preloads and two added loads have on spine mechanics both before and during the response to the added load. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of varying initial isometric and added step input load magnitudes on mechanical and electromyographic responses of the trunk during sudden loading that causes lateral bending moments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cocontractions of the antagonistic and agonistic muscles of the trunk are required for stability during loading of the spine. In several in vivo studies, it was observed that trunk muscle cocontraction serves a functional role before the application of unexpected or sudden loads. The response of agonistic and antagonistic trunk muscles to rapid lateral bend moments would provide further insight into the dynamic stability mechanisms of the spine. METHODS: In this study, 13 men maintained an upright standing posture while resisting the application of lateral bend moments produced by four different loading conditions comprising combinations of two preloads (5% or 15% of the maximum isometric lateral bend moment) and two added loads (20% or 30%). The preloading was used to develop different initial levels of trunk stiffness before the application of the added loads. The lateral bend moment and angular rotation of the trunk were measured, as well as the surface electromyogram amplitudes of the bilateral internal oblique, external oblique, rectus abdominus, lumbar erector spinae, and thoracic erector spinae muscles. Dependent measures were recorded during the steady state preload conditions, and peak values were recorded after the load was added. RESULTS: Higher added loads resulted in higher peak lateral bend rotations, and higher preloads resulted in lower rotations. The patterns of response were similar for the peak lateral bend moments and the electromyogram amplitudes from four of the five agonistic muscles. The thoracic erector spinae excepted, each of the other four muscles demonstrated larger responses in the agonistic muscles. However, all of the antagonistic muscles showed some increase in electromyogram activity in response to the added load. The thoracic erector spinae appeared to have the role of counteracting the flexor moments created by the abdominal muscles and the maintenance of spine stability. The agonistic external obliques and lumbar erector spinae had the largest responses to the added load. A comparison of the 35% loading conditions showed an increased response of the trunk to the 5% + 30% condition (with lower initial trunk stiffness), as compared with the 15% + 20% condition. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study show that higher levels of preactivation can serve to increase spine compression and trunk muscle stiffness, thereby attenuating the lateral displacements caused by rapid loading. Furthermore, antagonistic muscles were observed to respond rapidly to such perturbations with large increases in activation when preactivation and spine stability were low. The trunk muscles monitored all were larger, multisegmental muscles. The results from this study lend support to previous studies suggesting that the larger multisegmental muscles make a significant contribution to spinal stability.     

Measurement of loads on the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions

Ten male and ten female subjects were tested for their ability to exert maximal force about the lumbo-sacral junction (as is done during lifting) under controlled isometric and isokinetic conditions. The myoelectric activity of ten trunk muscles, intra-abdominal pressure, and torque produced by the back were monitored. There are prominent differences in the manner in which subjects utilize the musculature of the trunk for the production of torque statically and dynamically. A significant lag was identified between the onset of intra-abdominal pressure and torque, and this lag increased with increasing trunk velocity. These differences between isometric and isokinetic exertions suggest that isokinetic trunk testing provides a means of controlled evaluation that is appropriate for manual materials handling situations.     

Anatomical considerations for surgery of the anterolateral abdominal wall

Closure of large incisional hernias with the Components Separation Method (CSM) could be explained by medial-caudal rotation of the internal and transverse oblique muscles around their centres of origin. In eight human cadavers, the CSM was performed, and translation of the rectus abdominis muscle was measured. Mean unilateral translation of the rectus abdominis in the lateral-medial direction measured 2.2, 3.7, and 3.5 cm. This was 2.7, 4.5, and 4.0 cm after release of the posterior rectus sheath. Mean translation in a caudal direction was 0.5 cm, but seven cadavers showed a mean translation of 1 cm of the uppermost measuring point in a cranial direction. The hypothesis that rotation of separate tissue layers of the abdominal wall largely accounts for the translation effect of the CSM must be rejected. Release of the external oblique muscle produces more benefit to abdominal wall closure than release of the posterior rectus sheath.     

An indirect method to examine forces affecting Courvoisier's oblique gall-bladder incision.

The aim of this study is to establish a method by which the maximum forces attacking Courvoisier's oblique gall-bladder incision can be evaluated. Nine well-informed patients served as subjects. Four investigations were made: pre-, per-, and two postoperative. The pre- and postoperative maximum isometric muscle strength in pulling forward were measured with a dynamometer. Simultaneously the IEMG was obtained. A muscle tensiometer was used for registration of the peroperative muscle pull of the right abdominal rectus muscle, and IEMG obtained simultaneously. The IEMG makes a calculation of the pre- and postoperative rectus muscle pull possible. The study seems to indicate that the most realistic estimation of the forces attacking the wound in the early postoperative phase is a preoperative measurement of the maximum force in pulling forward (attempted trunk bending). If ruptures in the wound occur during the extubation, ruptures would very likely also occur in the early postoperative phase. Eight weeks after the operation the right rectus muscle has regained its preoperative strength.     

A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study of muscle recruitment patterns during asymmetric lifting in healthy individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate muscle recruitment patterns during asymmetric lifting, representing a common daily living activity, to determine whether systematic differences exist between functioning of the local and global muscle systems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The normal function of the local muscle system is to provide sufficient segmental stability to the spine. The global muscle system provides general trunk stabilization and enables the static and dynamic work necessary for daily living and sports activities. Current knowledge about these two muscle groups appears to be specifically derived from anatomic findings and experiments conducted under artificial circumstances. To the authors' knowledge, the recruitment patterns of both muscle groups have not been investigated in daily living activities. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy individuals performed different variants of asymmetric lifting activities. Electromyographic data were collected from seven hip, abdominal, and back muscle pairs. In addition, trunk kinematics were measured by means of an ultrasonic movement analysis system. RESULTS: The left and right obliquus internus, rectus femoris, and multifidus showed symmetric co-contraction in all variants of activities. In contrast, significant left/right differences were observed in the external oblique, gluteus maximus, iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracis, and latissimus dorsi. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show a symmetric activation of the local muscles during the performance of low-load, asymmetric lifting tasks, which suggests that these muscles play a stabilizing role during these manoeuvres. The global muscles, however, hand show asymmetric patterns of activation during the same tasks, supporting their role as global stabilizers and prime movers.     

Muscle activities during asymmetric trunk angular accelerations

The objective of this study was to characterize trunk muscle and intra-abdominal pressure behavior during extensions of the trunk when angular trunk acceleration levels and trunk twist were varied during lifting exertions. Since force is related to acceleration, it was believed that changes in trunk acceleration would cause activity changes in the muscles and abdominal cavity pressurization mechanics that load the spine during manual materials handling tasks. The electromyographic activity of 10 trunk muscles and intra-abdominal pressure were studied in 39 subjects as they moved their trunks under high, medium, and low constant angular acceleration conditions. The results indicated that almost all the muscles were affected by acceleration and asymmetry. Muscle activities of up to 50% of maximum were observed even though a minimal amount of torque was being produced by the back. Coactivation of muscles was also apparent. Muscles located at the greatest distances from the spine, such as the latissimus dorsi and oblique groups, increased their activities the most as trunk acceleration increased. Muscles located farthest from the spine also played an important role as the trunk became more asymmetric. Intra-abdominal pressure changed minimally over the test conditions. The nature of these responses and their impact on spine loading are discussed.