Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Renal function in patients with cadaveric kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

INTRODUCTION: Renal function predicts graft survival in kidney transplant patients. This study compared the 2-year evolution of renal function in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. METHODS: We studied 1558 cadaveric renal transplant recipients from 14 Spanish hospitals between January 2000 and December 2002. Of these, 1168 were treated with tacrolimus and 390 with cyclosporine. The primary efficacy endpoint was long-term renal function. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. This report summarizes the 2-year results. RESULTS: At 24 months the tacrolimus group showed significantly better serum creatinine (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and GFR (60.5 +/- 20.9 mL/min vs 47.9 +/- 10.0, P < .001) than the cyclosporine group. Additionally, recipients with ideal graft donors (23.5 +/- 2.8 vs 24.0 +/- 2.9 years) had a better serum creatinine at 2 years (1.23 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that tacrolimus was an independent factor associated with better renal function: odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.2 to 2.2), P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a renal transplant treated with tacrolimus in combination with MMF and prednisone displayed better renal function at 2 years than those who received cyclosporine.     

A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus

BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. METHODS: Forty consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective study in which antithymocyte globulin induction and 6 days of corticosteroids were administered along with tacrolimus and MMF (n=20) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=20). Mean+/-SD follow-up for recipients receiving tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus were 12.7+/-3.9 and 13.4+/-2.9 months, respectively. Patient and graft survival, and rejection rates were compared to an historical control group (n=86; mean follow-up 41.5+/-15.4 months) of SPK recipients that received induction and tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of recipient and donor variables were similar among all groups. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the 40 SPK transplant recipients with rapid corticosteroid elimination were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. In the historical control group the 1-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 96.5, 93.0, and 91.9%, respectively. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate recipients in the rapid steroid elimination group collectively was 97.5 vs 80.2% in the historical control group (P=0.034). At 6 and 12 months posttransplant the serum creatinine values remained stable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that chronic corticosteroid exposure is not required in SPK transplant recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immuno-suppression consisting of either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and sirolimus.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major concern after renal transplantation. To investigate the safety and efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen, 132 live-donor renal transplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and steroids. The patients were randomized to a maintenance immunosuppression regimen that included steroids, sirolimus, and either low-dose tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Over a mean follow-up period of approximately 5 yr, patient and graft survival did not significantly differ between the two maintenance regimens. Patient survival was 93.8% and 98.5% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus and MMF/sirolimus groups, respectively, and graft survival was 83% and 88%, respectively. However, the MMF/sirolimus group had significantly better renal function, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. In addition, this group was less likely to require a change in their primary immunosuppression regimen than the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (20.8% versus 53.8%, P = 0.001). The safety profile was similar between groups. In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients.     

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

Abstract:  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are effective immunosuppressive drugs with distinct safety profile.
Methods:  Kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppressive regimen were randomized to receive fixed daily doses of MMF (2 g/d, n = 50) or SRL (one loading dose of 15 mg, 5 mg/d till day 7 and 2 mg/d thereafter, n = 50) without induction therapy.
Results:  No differences were observed in the incidence of the composite (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) end-point (18% vs. 16%, p = 1.000), biopsy confirmed acute rejection (12% vs. 14%, p = 1.000), one-yr patient (94% vs. 98%, p = 0.308), graft (92% vs. 98%, p = 0.168), and death-censored graft survival (98% vs. 100%, p = 0.317) comparing patients receiving MMF or SRL respectively. Patients receiving SRL showed worse safety outcomes, higher mean creatinine (1.6 ± 0.5 mg/dL vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL, p = 0.007), higher proportion of patients with proteinuria (52.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.041), higher mean urinary protein concentrations (0.3 ± 0.5 g/L vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 g/L, p = 0.012), higher mean cholesterol concentration (217 mg/dL vs. 190 mg/dL, p = 0.030), and higher proportion of patients prematurely discontinued from randomized therapy (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.031).
Conclusion:  In patients receiving TAC, MMF produced similar efficacy but superior safety profile compared with SRL.     

The use of an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody and mycophenolate mofetil enables the use of a low-dose tacrolimus and early withdrawal of steroids in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reducing calcineurin-inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity and simultaneously avoiding long-term steroid related side-effects is a desirable goal in renal transplantation. We examined the hypothesis that using anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would allow the lowering of target pre-dose blood concentrations of tacrolimus immediately after transplantation and subsequently stopping steroids at 5 months. METHODS: Eighty-two kidney recipients were enrolled in a single-center study comparing two tacrolimus-based protocols. Group I (n = 41) patients received a standard-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 10-15 ng/mL) with MMF and a standard dose corticosteroid. Group II (n = 41) patients were treated with a low-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 5-10 ng/mL) and MMF, a low-dose corticosteroid (stopped after 5 months) and induction with daclizumab. RESULTS: Patient (95.1 versus 100%) and graft survival (92.6 versus 97.5%) at 1 yr were not different between groups. Patients of group II experienced significantly less acute rejections than group I (17.1 versus 41.4% p = 0.03). Delayed graft function occurred less often in group II (5 versus 12% p = 0.43). Graft function at 1 yr was significantly better in group II (serum creatinine 1.49 versus 1.69 mg/dL and creatinine clearance 59.6 versus 49 mL/min; p < 0.05). Corticosteroids could be stopped after 5 months in 82.9% of group II patients. CONCLUSION: A regimen consisting of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and MMF allows the safe and efficient use of low-target pre-dose trough concentrations of tacrolimus and enables the early discontinuation of steroids. Preliminary results indicate a better 1-yr graft function compared to a normal-dose tacrolimus regimen.     

Mycophenolate mofetil tolerability and dose changes in tacrolimus-treated renal allograft recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces acute rejection episodes (AREs) and may be associated with better renal graft survival than azathioprine. However, MMF-related adverse events are frequent; dose reduction or even withdrawal are quite common. Between 1999 and 2003, 115 renal transplantation patients were treated with tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids. An observational study was undertaken until graft loss (n = 7), death with a functioning graft (n = 2), or October 31, 2005 (mean follow-up-50 months). We assessed MMF dose reductions due to adverse events with the possible consequences on AREs and graft function. Treated acute ARE occurred in 11.3% of recipients, all of which were steroid-responsive. The median MMF initial daily dose was 1000 mg. In 44 patients (38.3%), the MMF dose was not changed; in 48 (41.7%) it was reduced; and in 23 (20%), withdrawn. The causes for dose modification were diarrhea (n = 33, 28.7% of all patients), leukopenia (n = 22, 19.1%), both of these (n = 7, 6.1%), or other events (n = 9, 7.8%). No AREs were attributed to MMF dose changes. Tacrolimus blood levels were higher at 3 years and serum creatinine values at 4 years among patients with dose changes (8.43 +/- 2.42 vs 7.37 +/- 2.23 ng/mL; P = .051 and 1.75 +/- 0.71 vs 1.48 +/- 0.38 mg/dL; P = .038, respectively). The need for MMF dose reduction or withdrawal was frequent in our patients with diarrhea or leukopenia during treatment with tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids. These adverse event-related changes were not associated with AREs, but produced deleterious effects on long-term graft function.     

Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) provides superior prophylaxis against acute rejection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) in heart and renal transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this results in improved survival or reduced morbidity after heart transplantation. METHOD: In a sequential study, 240 cardiac transplant patients were treated with either MMF (n=119) or AZA (n=121) both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. RESULTS: By protocol lower cyclosporine levels were targeted in the MMF group during the first year (e.g. 203+/-52 ng/mL MMF vs. 236+/-59 ng/mL AZA, P=0.0006 at 6 months). Patient survival at 1 year (82% MMF vs. 79% AZA, P=0.55) and at 3 years was similar in both groups. The cumulative probability of receiving antirejection treatment within 1 year was lower in the MMF group, as was biopsy-proven acute rejection with International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A (24% vs. 35%, P=0.03). The MMF group also had fewer episodes requiring cytolytic therapy (6% vs. 13%, P=0.04) and more patients had steroids withdrawn by 1 year (66% vs. 32%, P<0.001). Renal function was better in the MMF group with lower creatinine levels at 1 year (133+/-45 vs. 155+/-46 micromol/L, P=0.0004). Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft and Gault formula) at 1 year was also better (MMF 74+/-32 mL/min vs. AZA 62+/-24 mL/min, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that immunosuppression with MMF rather than AZA may allow lower cyclosporine levels, better renal function, and increased steroid weaning at 1 year while also achieving better control of acute rejection.     

Lipid metabolism in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus/sirolimus combination therapy

INTRODUCTION: The administration of sirolimus has been reported to be associated with high serum cholesterol and high triglyceride values. In a large prospective, multicenter 6-month study in renal transplantation, basic parameters of lipid metabolism (total serum cholesterol and triglycerides) were systematically assessed in patients who received tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids (Tac/MMF), tacrolimus/0.5 mg sirolimus (SIR)/steroids (Tac/0.5SIR) on tacrolimus/2 mg sirolimus/steroids (Tac/2SIR). METHODS: For purposes of analysis, lipid parameters were classified using the National Kidney Foundation Dyslipidemia Classification definitions. RESULTS: Complete sets of data at all visits (baseline, months 1, 3, and 6) were available for 211 Tac/MMF, 210 Tac/0.5SIR, and 203 Tac/2SIR patients. Total serum cholesterol in the Tac/MMF group was 193.4 at baseline and 202.9 mg/dL at month 6. Values increased from 196 mg/dL to 212.5 mg/dL in Tac/0.5SIR and from 200 mg/dL to 230.5 mg/dL in Tac/2SIR. Differences in parameters between treatment groups were statistically significant (P < .05). Serum triglycerides decreased from baseline to 6 months in Tac/MMF, increased from 176.3 mg/dL (baseline) to 191.4 mg/dL (6 months) in Tac/0.5SIR and from 203 mg/dL to 255.3 mg/dL in Tac/2SIR. Parameters differed significantly between Tac/0.5SIR versus Tac/2SIR at P = .0069, and between Tac/MMF versus Tac/2SIR at P = .0013. In the Tac/2SIR group 36.5% had "high" serum cholesterol and 8.3% had "very high" triglyceride levels at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Total serum cholesterol levels were relatively stable and serum triglycerides decreased between baseline and month 6 using a Tac/MMF regimen. Contrastingly, the Tac/SIR combinations led to increased total cholesterol values (at both sirolimus dose levels) and Tac/2SIR also led to increased triglyceride levels.     

Comparison of Sirolimus with Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Sirolimus-based Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Regimen in Live Donor Renal Transplantation

Between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live donor renal allotransplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial where they were divided into two groups. All patients received steroids and basiliximab induction therapy. For maintenance immunosuppression, tacrolimus and sirolimus were used in group A. In group B, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus were utilized. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. One-year patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different between group A (96.9%, 92.3%) and group B (100%, 98.4%), respectively. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was less in group B but the difference was not statistically significant (13.5% vs. 18.5% in group A). Statistically significant better renal function was encountered among group B patients at two years post-transplantation as measured by serum creatinine (1.25 vs. 1.43 mg/dl; P = 0.017) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (94.9 vs. 79.6 ml/min; P = 0.005). One year protocol biopsies showed insignificant differences relative to chronic allograft damage index (CADI) between either group (Group A: 2.41 vs. Group B: 2.69; P = 0.436). Conclusion: Similar outcome was noted among patients in whom calcineurin inhibitors were not included in their immunosuppressive regimen. The long term impact of this observation on graft survival and function needs longer follow up.     

Tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) as maintenance immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients

The effects of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine (Neoral) on graft survival, function, and metabolic profile were evaluated in 69 patients receiving Neoral (group 1) and 54 patients receiving FK506 (group 2) for maintenance immunosuppression following kidney transplantation. Recipient and donor demographics and induction therapy were comparable, except for a higher number of sensitized patients in group 2 (n = 13). Acute rejection timing, severity, and infection rates and types were similar in both groups. During hospitalization, at 6 months, and at 1 year following transplantation, no significant differences were noted between groups in fasting glucose, serum cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, or need for insulin or antihypertensive therapy. Mean serum creatinine levels on discharge (1.42 mg/dL +/- 0.14 vs 1.68 mg/dL +/- 0.3), at 1 month (1.45 mg/dL +/- 0.1 vs 1.39 mg/dL +/- 0.11), 3 months (1.46 mg/dL +/- 0.09 vs 1.32 mg/dL +/- 0.14), and 1 year (1.29 mg/dL +/- 0.08 vs 1.19 mg/dL +/- 0.09), but not at 6 months (1.42 +/- 0.37 vs 1.10 +/- 0.07; P = .001), were comparable between groups. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 98.3% for group 1 and 94.5% for group 2. When evaluated for acute rejection, infection, and metabolic differences, we conclude that both tacrolimus and cyclosporine are effective and safe calcineurin inhibitors for short-term use in kidney transplantation. A similar study is proposed to evaluate the long-term effects of both agents.     

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.     

Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil 48 hours before renal transplantation enables the use of low cyclosporine doses and achieves better graft function

Reducing calcineurin-inhibitor induced nephrotoxicity and simultaneously avoiding long-term side effects are desirable goals in renal transplantation. We examined the hypothesis that administration of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 48 hours before renal transplantation allows reduction in the target cyclosporine C2 concentration, thus decreasing toxicity and improving graft function. We enrolled 80 kidney recipients in a single-center study comparing 2 cyclosporine-based protocols. Group I patients (n = 40) received a standard dose of cyclosporine (blood cyclosporine C2, 800-1500 ng/mL) with MMF and standard doses of corticosteroids. Group II patients (n = 40) were treated with a low dose of cyclosporine (blood cyclosporine C2, 450-800 ng/mL) and MMF plus low doses of corticosteroids after induction 48 hours before surgery with cyclosporine and MMF. Patient (97.5% vs 100%) and graft survivals (92.5% vs 95%) at 1 year were not different between the groups, although patients in group II experienced significantly fewer acute rejection episodes (10% vs 30%; P < .01). Delayed graft function occurred less often among group I than group II (17.5 vs 20%), but the difference was not significant. Graft function at 1 year was significantly better among group II (serum creatinine 1.31 vs 1.64 mg/dL and creatinine clearance 63 mL/min versus 47 mL/min; P < .05). We concluded that administration of cyclosporine and MMF 48 hours before renal transplantation allowed the safe effective use of low target C2 cyclosporine concentrations, enabling an early decrease in cyclosporine dose. These preliminary results indicated better 1-year graft function compared with the normal cyclosporine dose regimen.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure: 60-month results of the CRAF Study

BACKGROUND: This study compared the long-term effects of switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on the incidence, progression, and severity of chronic renal allograft failure in patients with elevated serum creatinine levels. METHODS: Patients were assigned randomly (2:1) to switch to tacrolimus or remain on cyclosporine. Tacrolimus was initiated at 1/50th of the cyclosporine dose or 0.15 mg/kg/day, whichever dose was lower, to maintain trough concentrations between 5 and 15 ng/mL. Cyclosporine doses were adjusted to achieve trough concentrations between 100 and 300 ng/mL. RESULTS: At 60 months, the median change from baseline in serum creatinine was -0.2 mg/dL in the tacrolimus group and 0.3 mg/dL in the cyclosporine group (P=0.003). Median change in estimated creatinine clearance was 1.2 mL/min in the tacrolimus group and -4.1 mL/min in the cyclosporine group (P=0.019). The incidence of new-onset diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypertension, lymphoma, and malignancies was generally low and comparable between groups. Fewer patients in the tacrolimus group than in the cyclosporine group developed new cardiac conditions (11% vs. 28%, P=0.004), had low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol values more than 130 mg/dL (29% vs. 57%, P=0.002), or developed hyperlipidemia (24% vs. 67%, P=0.046) during the 60-month follow-up period. Despite these changes, patient and graft survival were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: Switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus resulted in improved renal function and a reduction in the occurrence of new-onset cardiac conditions and hyperlipidemia, with no increase in the incidence of new-onset diabetes or new-onset hyperglycemia. However, after 5 years there was no impact on patient or graft survival.     

Randomized trial of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation

The optimal long-term regimen for immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We conducted a randomized trial involving 150 kidney transplant recipients to compare tacrolimus/sirolimus, tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine/sirolimus. All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. Median follow-up was 8 yr post-transplant. Acute rejection (AR) occurred significantly less often among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (30%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (28%). Mean estimated GFR was consistently higher in the tacrolimus/MMF arm, especially after controlling for donor age in a multivariable model during the first 36 mo (P ≤ 0.008). The rate of dying with a functioning graft was significantly higher among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (26%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (4%). We did not observe significant differences in actuarial graft survival at 8 yr post-transplant between the groups. Patient noncompliance seemed responsible for 45% (13/29) of observed graft failures, with 11 of these occurring after 36 mo. Significantly more viral infections, protocol violations, and need for antilipid therapy occurred among patients receiving sirolimus, but we did not observe differences between the groups with regard to infections requiring hospitalization or new-onset diabetes. Taken together, these results suggest that maintenance therapy with tacrolimus/MMF is more favorable than either tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/sirolimus.     

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: 1-year results of a large multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) transplantation has become an accepted therapy for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. This open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with the microemulsion (ME) formulation of cyclosporine in a clinical setting. The 1-year results are reported here. METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 European centers and one center in Israel. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus and 102 to cyclosporine-ME. All patients received concomitant rabbit anti-T-cell globulin induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term cortico-steroids. The initial daily oral doses were 0.2 mg/kg for tacrolimus, 7 mg/kg for cyclosporine-ME, and 2 to 3 g for MMF. RESULTS: The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas acute rejection was lower with tacrolimus (27.2%) than with cyclosporine-ME (38.2%; P = 0.09). Pancreas graft survival at 1 year was 91.3% with tacrolimus and 74.5% with cyclosporine-ME (P <0.0005). Renal graft survival was similar in the two study groups. There were no significant treatment-related differences in pancreatic or renal graft function. In total, 34 patients switched treatment from cyclosporine-ME to tacrolimus, but only 6 patients receiving tacrolimus required alternative therapy. Mean doses of MMF at 1 year were also lower in the tacrolimus group (1.36 vs. 1.67 g/day; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of tacrolimus therapy for uremic patients with type 1 diabetes who are undergoing SPK transplantation.     

Single-center, open, prospective, randomized pilot study comparing cyclosporine versus tacrolimus in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Although tacrolimus (Prograf) is the calcineurin inhibitor usually employed in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx), no prospective randomized studies have compared its efficacy to cyclosporine (Neoral), when either drug is used in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and the pancreas is drained into the portal vein. METHODS: Between May 2001 and June 2003, 16 SPKTx recipients were randomized to be prescribed Neoral and 17 Prograf in addition to basiliximab, steroids, and MMF. All pancreata were drained into the portal vein. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 15.6 months, six kidney acute rejection episodes were observed with Prograf (36.5%; one steroid-resistant) and one Neoral (n = 1, 6.2%; P =.04). No pancreas rejection episode was recorded. Two infections occurred in two recipients from each group. No major adverse events were noted other than a severe hematological toxicity (Prograf). Metabolic parameters were equivalent in the two groups, save for higher total cholesterol (212 +/- 39 mg/dL vs 173 +/- 23 mg/dL; P =.008), LDL (129 +/- 33 mg/dL vs 101 +/- 21 mg/dL; P =.029), and triglyceride (191 +/- 86 mg/dL vs 126 +/- 40 mg/dL; P =.028), values with Neoral, although the same differences were already present at baseline. One recipient (Neoral) died with functioning grafts. Patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates were all 94% for Neoral versus 100% for Prograf. CONCLUSIONS: Although a larger series and a longer follow-up are needed, Neoral and Prograf used in combination with MMF seem to achieve equivalent success rates among primary SPKTx when the pancreas is drained into the portal vein.     

Tacrolimus as secondary intervention vs. cyclosporine continuation in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft failure (CRAF) is the leading cause of graft loss post-renal transplantation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as secondary intervention in cyclosporine-treated kidney transplantation patients with impaired allograft function as indicated by elevated serum creatinine (SCr) levels. METHODS: Patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression who had an elevated SCr at least 3 months post-renal transplantation were enrolled. Treatment allocation was 2:1 to switch to tacrolimus or continue cyclosporine. This analysis was performed after 2 yr; patients will be followed for an additional 3 yr. RESULTS: There were 186 enrolled and evaluable patients. On baseline biopsy, 90% of patients had chronic allograft nephropathy. Baseline median SCr was 2.5 mg/dL in both treatment groups. For patients with graft function at month 24, SCr had decreased to 2.3 mg/dL in the tacrolimus-treated patients and increased to 2.6 mg/dL in the cyclosporine-treated patients (p = 0.01). Acute rejection occurred in 4.8% of tacrolimus-treated patients and 5.0% of cyclosporine-treated patients during follow-up. Two-year allograft survival was comparable between groups (tacrolimus 69%, cyclosporine 67%; p = 0.70). Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new-onset infections. Cardiac conditions developed in significantly fewer tacrolimus-treated patients (5.6%) than cyclosporine-treated patients (24.3%; p = 0.004). Glucose levels and the incidences of new-onset diabetes and new-onset hyperglycemia did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus results in improved renal function and lipid profiles, and significantly fewer cardiovascular events with no differences in the incidence of acute rejection or new-onset hyperglycemia.